Re: [ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org: osgearth_2.4.0+dfsg-4_amd64.changes REJECTED]
Hi Andreas Bas, It looks like you fixed all issues during my FOSS4G conference absence. Thanks a lot! Pirmin Am Donnerstag, 19. September 2013, 17.53:55 schrieb Sebastiaan Couwenberg: Hi Andreas, On 09/19/2013 02:49 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 01:41:41PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: It's probably a good idea to rename the tags to ubuntu/version to reflect the destination of the packaging. Yes, please! The two Debian releases can be tagged debian/version Yes. We can fix the changelog for Debian by appending ~ubuntu1 to the versions which were only uploaded to the UbuntuGIS PPA. I've done this for MapCache on advise from Francesco, because MapCache has so far only been uploaded to the UbuntuGIS PPA. It would be great if you could fix this also for osgearth. The ubuntu releases have their version appended with ~ubuntu1. The tags are renamed, and the Debian tag for 2.0-4 there too. Although neither the ubuntu nor the debian tag match the state of the source package for 2.0+dfsg-4 exactly. The current tagged commit is the closest. Thanks for the clarification Andreas. Your welcome. Bas -- Pirmin Kalberer Sourcepole - Linux Open Source Solutions http://www.sourcepole.com ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org: osgearth_2.4.0+dfsg-4_amd64.changes REJECTED]
Hi, hmmm, this came a bit unexpected from looking at the changelog. From what I can see at http://packages.debian.org/sid/osgearth there is no later version than 2.0+dfsg-4 uploaded to Debian. The changelog in Git is mentioning a *lot* of intermediate versions targeting at unstable but they are not. Usually you should tag something that was not released as UNRELEASED or if you upload to some other target distribution (for instance to Ubuntu) you should use this (and use a versioning like 2.4.0+dfsg-0ubuntu0 or so. Could you please clarify what *really* was uploaded before? I would like to sort this out first before I simply build using --debbuildopts -sa because I do not intend to upload with a missleading changelog. In some sense the status at packages.debian.org is matching the tags $ git tag | grep ^debian debian/1.3-3 debian/1.3-4 debian/1.4-2 debian/1.4-3 debian/1.4-4 debian/1.4-5 debian/1.4-6 debian/1.4.1-1 debian/2.0-1 debian/2.0-2 debian/2.0-4 debian/2.0rc4-1 debian/2.4-1 Which means 2.1.1+dfsg-1 and 2.4-[23] are missing - no idea about 2.4-1. Pirmin, could you please shed some light into this? Kind regards Andreas. - Forwarded message from Debian FTP Masters ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org - Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 21:50:11 + From: Debian FTP Masters ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org To: Debian GIS Project pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org, Bas Couwenberg sebas...@xs4all.nl, ti...@debian.org Subject: osgearth_2.4.0+dfsg-4_amd64.changes REJECTED osgearth_2.4.0+dfsg-4.dsc refers to non-existing file: osgearth_2.4.0+dfsg.orig.tar.gz Perhaps you need to include it in your upload? === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel - End forwarded message - -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org: osgearth_2.4.0+dfsg-4_amd64.changes REJECTED]
Hi Andreas and Pirmin, On 09/19/2013 10:04 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi, hmmm, this came a bit unexpected from looking at the changelog. From what I can see at http://packages.debian.org/sid/osgearth there is no later version than 2.0+dfsg-4 uploaded to Debian. The changelog in Git is mentioning a *lot* of intermediate versions targeting at unstable but they are not. Usually you should tag something that was not released as UNRELEASED or if you upload to some other target distribution (for instance to Ubuntu) you should use this (and use a versioning like 2.4.0+dfsg-0ubuntu0 or so. Could you please clarify what *really* was uploaded before? I would like to sort this out first before I simply build using --debbuildopts -sa because I do not intend to upload with a missleading changelog. In some sense the status at packages.debian.org is matching the tags $ git tag | grep ^debian debian/1.3-3 debian/1.3-4 debian/1.4-2 debian/1.4-3 debian/1.4-4 debian/1.4-5 debian/1.4-6 debian/1.4.1-1 debian/2.0-1 debian/2.0-2 debian/2.0-4 debian/2.0rc4-1 debian/2.4-1 Which means 2.1.1+dfsg-1 and 2.4-[23] are missing - no idea about 2.4-1. Pirmin, could you please shed some light into this? Most outdated GIS packages in Debian are usually more actively maintained in the UbuntuGIS PPA. osgEarth is no different. Version 2.1.1+dfsg-1 was uploaded to the UbuntuGIS PPA, and is listed on launchpad in ubuntugis-unstable for oneiric. Version 2.4.0+dfsg-1 was uploaded to the UbuntuGIS PPA, and is listed on launchpad in ubuntugis-unstable for precise. Version 2.4.0+dfsg-2 is missing from the UbuntuGIS PPA, and was probably never uploaded (anywhere public). Version 2.4.0+dfsg-3 was uploaded to the UbuntuGIS PPA, and is listed on launchpad in ubuntugis-unstable for precise and raring. https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugis/+archive/ubuntugis-unstable/+packages?field.name_filter=osgearthfield.status_filter=field.series_filter= It's probably a good idea to rename the tags to ubuntu/version to reflect the destination of the packaging. The two Debian releases can be tagged debian/version We can fix the changelog for Debian by appending ~ubuntu1 to the versions which were only uploaded to the UbuntuGIS PPA. I've done this for MapCache on advise from Francesco, because MapCache has so far only been uploaded to the UbuntuGIS PPA. Kind regards Andreas. Kind Regards, Bas - Forwarded message from Debian FTP Masters ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org - Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 21:50:11 + From: Debian FTP Masters ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org To: Debian GIS Project pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org, Bas Couwenberg sebas...@xs4all.nl, ti...@debian.org Subject: osgearth_2.4.0+dfsg-4_amd64.changes REJECTED osgearth_2.4.0+dfsg-4.dsc refers to non-existing file: osgearth_2.4.0+dfsg.orig.tar.gz Perhaps you need to include it in your upload? === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel - End forwarded message - -- GnuPG: 0xE88D4AF1 (new) / 0x77A975AD (old) ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org: osgearth_2.4.0+dfsg-4_amd64.changes REJECTED]
Hi Bas, On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 01:41:41PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: Which means 2.1.1+dfsg-1 and 2.4-[23] are missing - no idea about 2.4-1. Pirmin, could you please shed some light into this? Most outdated GIS packages in Debian are usually more actively maintained in the UbuntuGIS PPA. osgEarth is no different. One good reason to bring Debian up to date. ;-) Version 2.1.1+dfsg-1 was uploaded to the UbuntuGIS PPA, and is listed on launchpad in ubuntugis-unstable for oneiric. Version 2.4.0+dfsg-1 was uploaded to the UbuntuGIS PPA, and is listed on launchpad in ubuntugis-unstable for precise. I personally have no idea how to work with PPAs (please excuse my ignorance I'm pure Debian based and did not found time to dive into PPAs). However, I think it would be a good idea to avoid unstable as target distribution for a PPA upload. Either oneiric resp. precise should be injected here or something like unstable-ppa could fix the confusion. Version 2.4.0+dfsg-2 is missing from the UbuntuGIS PPA, and was probably never uploaded (anywhere public). Version 2.4.0+dfsg-3 was uploaded to the UbuntuGIS PPA, and is listed on launchpad in ubuntugis-unstable for precise and raring. ... or ubuntugis-unstable could be a proper target distribution. https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugis/+archive/ubuntugis-unstable/+packages?field.name_filter=osgearthfield.status_filter=field.series_filter= It's probably a good idea to rename the tags to ubuntu/version to reflect the destination of the packaging. Yes, please! The two Debian releases can be tagged debian/version Yes. We can fix the changelog for Debian by appending ~ubuntu1 to the versions which were only uploaded to the UbuntuGIS PPA. I've done this for MapCache on advise from Francesco, because MapCache has so far only been uploaded to the UbuntuGIS PPA. It would be great if you could fix this also for osgearth. Thanks for the clarification Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org: osgearth_2.4.0+dfsg-4_amd64.changes REJECTED]
Hi Andreas, On 09/19/2013 02:49 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 01:41:41PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: It's probably a good idea to rename the tags to ubuntu/version to reflect the destination of the packaging. Yes, please! The two Debian releases can be tagged debian/version Yes. We can fix the changelog for Debian by appending ~ubuntu1 to the versions which were only uploaded to the UbuntuGIS PPA. I've done this for MapCache on advise from Francesco, because MapCache has so far only been uploaded to the UbuntuGIS PPA. It would be great if you could fix this also for osgearth. The ubuntu releases have their version appended with ~ubuntu1. The tags are renamed, and the Debian tag for 2.0-4 there too. Although neither the ubuntu nor the debian tag match the state of the source package for 2.0+dfsg-4 exactly. The current tagged commit is the closest. Thanks for the clarification Andreas. Your welcome. Bas -- GnuPG: 0xE88D4AF1 (new) / 0x77A975AD (old) ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
osgearth_2.4.0+dfsg-4_amd64.changes REJECTED
osgearth_2.4.0+dfsg-4.dsc refers to non-existing file: osgearth_2.4.0+dfsg.orig.tar.gz Perhaps you need to include it in your upload? === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
