Bug#441513: classpath: FTBFS: unmet b-dep ecj-bootstrap

2007-09-10 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Package: classpath
version: 2:0.95-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070905 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.

Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), ecj-bootstrap, zip, libgtk2.0-dev, 
libgconf2-dev, libart-2.0-dev, libx11-dev, libice-dev, libxt-dev, libxtst-dev, 
libasound2-dev, libcairo2-dev, dpatch, libqt4-dev (= 4.1.0), dssi-dev, 
ladspa-sdk, libjack0.100.0-dev, libxul-dev, libmagic-dev
Build-Depends-Indep: gjdoc (= 0.7.5-4)
Checking for already installed source dependencies...
debhelper: missing
Using default version 5.0.53
ecj-bootstrap: missing
zip: missing
libgtk2.0-dev: missing
libgconf2-dev: missing
libart-2.0-dev: missing
libx11-dev: missing
libice-dev: missing
libxt-dev: missing
libxtst-dev: missing
libasound2-dev: missing
libcairo2-dev: missing
dpatch: missing
libqt4-dev: missing
Using default version 4.3.1-2
dssi-dev: missing
ladspa-sdk: missing
libjack0.100.0-dev: missing
libxul-dev: missing
libmagic-dev: missing
gjdoc: missing
Using default version 0.7.8-6
Checking for source dependency conflicts...
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
Reading state information...
Package ecj-bootstrap is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source
However the following packages replace it:
  libecj-java ecj
E: Package ecj-bootstrap has no installation candidate
apt-get failed.
Package installation failed
Trying to reinstall removed packages:
Trying to uninstall newly installed packages:
Source-dependencies not satisfied; skipping classpath

The full build log is available from
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2007/09/05

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at 
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386
environment.  Internet was not accessible from the build systems.

-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |



___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


libpixie-java_0.8.7-1_powerpc.changes REJECTED

2007-09-10 Thread Joerg Jaspert
Hi Maintainer,

rejected, where is the source for jcommon-1.0.10.jar?

-- 
bye Joerg



===

If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.

___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


Bug#165324: fw: Read this ASAP

2007-09-10 Thread Robbie Womack
ALERT
Buy Tuesday September 11th 2007

ww Energy Inc.
Sym: wwng

This stock is going to once again, EXPLODE!

Real company, real earnings, not a pump and dump!

Current: $.01
Expected: $.54

#1 pick this week.

Check 07/10/07. 2 months ago. 
This Stock exploded, traded over 7 million shares.
It's going to do it again. Get in on the money train now!

Company info:
WW Energy, Inc., through its subsidiaries, provides services 
to the oil and gas industry. The company engages in the 
acquisition, exploration, exploitation, and development of 
leases, and oil and gas related assets. It has exploitation 
projects in Texas, Utah, and New Mexico. The company also 
engages in transporting fresh production water for oil drilling 
and exploration, and waste water for disposal. In addition, it 
provides services for heavy hauling of drilling and well 
equipment used in oil and gas production and exploration 
industry. The company also operates in Colorado and 
Arizona. WW Energy was founded in 1999 and is based in 
Farmington, New Mexico.




___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


Processed: owner 441640

2007-09-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
 owner 441640 !
Bug#441640: wagon: FTBFS: The import com.jcraft cannot be resolved
Owner recorded as Paul Cager [EMAIL PROTECTED].


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


Re: Bug#441640: wagon: FTBFS: The import com.jcraft cannot be resolved

2007-09-10 Thread Paul Cager
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
 Package: wagon
 version: 1.0-beta-2-1
 Severity: serious
 User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070905 qa-ftbfs
 Justification: FTBFS on i386
 
 Hi,
 
 During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
 [...]
 The full build log is available from
 http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2007/09/05
 

It looks as though the build used the old jsch:
Get:99 http://idpot.grenoble.grid5000.fr sid/main libjsch-java 0.1.34-1
[170kB]

This version of jsch had a duff symlink pointing to the old (now
non-existent) jsch-0.1.28.jar.

It builds OK in pbuilder with the new jsch (0.1.34ds1-1) which entered
unstable just after this FTBFS, so I'm closing the bug.

___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


libjcommon-java 1.0.10-1 MIGRATED to testing

2007-09-10 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the libjcommon-java source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.0.6-1
  Current version:  1.0.10-1

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.

___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


Aprenda a Investir na Bolsa de Valo res |São Paulo| 14 e 15 de Setembro

2007-09-10 Thread XP Educação












 








CIDADE

DATAS

LOCAL

ENDEREÇO




São Paulo

14 e 15 

XP Investimentos

Av. Brigadeiro Faria Lima 1461,
15º andar - São Paulo


Sexta Feira das 19h às 22h30e Sábado das9h às 17h 


Investimento: R$390,00 ou 340,00 para universitários 










Clique para não receber mais e-mails.





___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers

RFC: docbook-xsl-saxon (Java extensions for use with DocBook XML stylesheets (Saxon))

2007-09-10 Thread Daniel Leidert
x-post to debian-java, debian-mentors and pkg-java-maintainers

Hi,

I'm building docbook-xsl-saxon, a Java package, that provides
docbook-xsl related extensions. For those interested in the packaging
files, see
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debian-xml-sgml/packages/docbook-xsl-saxon/trunk/debian/?rev=0sc=0

I receive these informational objects from lintian:

I: docbook-xsl-saxon source: build-depends-without-arch-dep ant
I: docbook-xsl-saxon source: build-depends-without-arch-dep
java-gcj-compat-dev

Now I'm unsure, if lintian is right here. The clean target is defined in
an ant makefile (build.xml). So ant and java are both used in the clean
target. To my understanding of Build-Depends and Build-Depends-Indep, I
have to list at least ant in Build-Depends, not in Build-Depends-Indep.
I'm not sure about java-gcj-compat-dev, because java-gcj-compat provides
the java binary.

The package builds fine with kaffe and gcj-java-compat-dev. BTW: Do both
use ecj to compile the source? If yes, where is the difference, if I use
gcj-java-compat-dev or kaffe as build-dependency? I'm sorry for the
questions, but this is my first Java package and I'm trying to learn
more about Java packaging for Debian.

Please split answers and send them to the right list if you want. I'm
subscribed to all 3 lists, this posting is sent to.

Regards, Daniel


___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


Aprenda a Investir na Bolsa de Valo res |São Paulo| 14 e 15 de Setembro

2007-09-10 Thread XP Educação












 








CIDADE

DATAS

LOCAL

ENDEREÇO




São Paulo

14 e 15 

XP Investimentos

Av. Brigadeiro Faria Lima 1461,
15º andar - São Paulo


Sexta Feira das 19h às 22h30e Sábado das9h às 17h 


Investimento: R$390,00 ou 340,00 para universitários 










Clique para não receber mais e-mails.





___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers