Bug#600338: May contain non-free data
Package: libitext1-java Version: all Severity: serious Justification: Unmodifiable/distributable files User: k...@kgoetz.id.au Usertags: libreplanet Per a redhat bug report [1] and a related debian bug [2], itext has a number of non dfsg files. /* * Copyright 1998 by Sun Microsystems, Inc., * 901 San Antonio Road, Palo Alto, California, 94303, U.S.A. * All rights reserved. * * This software is the confidential and proprietary information * of Sun Microsystems, Inc. (Confidential Information). You * shall not disclose such Confidential Information and shall use * it only in accordance with the terms of the license agreement * you entered into with Sun. */ [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=236309 [2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=519466 Please make a dfsg free version of the package. thanks, kk -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS) Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group signature.asc Description: PGP signature __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Bug#451258: Possible to backport to squeeze?
Hello, On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org wrote: I’m bitten by this bug on a debian lenny+backports installation. And I really want to avoid installing software from experimental... :-) Any chance that this bug fix can be backported to squeeze? It's too late for backporting a fix like this from experimental to squeeze at this point, I don't think it would make it through the release team, and I would have very little arguments to give. However, I'm willing to upload a backport of 1.0 to squeeze-backports, should it be necessary. (but I saw you were responsible for the lenny backports; would you keep on going with them for squeeze ?) As of now, fop 1.0 is in experimental to avoid potentially disturbing package builds, but I don't really think it more unstable than the current testing/unstable version. Cheers, Vincent __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Bug#451258: Possible to backport to squeeze?
Hi, Am Samstag, den 16.10.2010, 13:21 +0200 schrieb Vincent Fourmond: Hello, On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org wrote: I’m bitten by this bug on a debian lenny+backports installation. And I really want to avoid installing software from experimental... :-) Any chance that this bug fix can be backported to squeeze? It's too late for backporting a fix like this from experimental to squeeze at this point, I don't think it would make it through the release team, and I would have very little arguments to give. Fair enough. However, I'm willing to upload a backport of 1.0 to squeeze-backports, should it be necessary. (but I saw you were responsible for the lenny backports; would you keep on going with them for squeeze ?) I don’t mind. As a matter of fact, I already built it for lenny: http://people.debian.org/~nomeata/fop-lenny/ For it to be accepted in squeeze-backports it would have migrate to testing after the squeeze release first, though. As of now, fop 1.0 is in experimental to avoid potentially disturbing package builds, but I don't really think it more unstable than the current testing/unstable version. Good to know, as it is now installed on the production machine. Thanks, Joachim -- Joachim nomeata Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
