Processing of maven-debian-helper_2.2.6_source.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

maven-debian-helper_2.2.6_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  maven-debian-helper_2.2.6.dsc
  maven-debian-helper_2.2.6.tar.xz
  maven-debian-helper_2.2.6_amd64.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#878103: Pending fixes for bugs in the maven-debian-helper package

[pkg-java-maintainers]

tag 878103 + pending
thanks

Some bugs in the maven-debian-helper package are closed in revision
26335a5583f7f827290050f8711ba40c47f3601d in branch 'master' by
Christopher Hoskin

The full diff can be seen at
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/maven-debian-helper.git/commit/?id=26335a5

Commit message:

Team upload.

* Team upload.
* Fix "Wrong package name for -doc packages" use unless instead of &&
  (Closes: #878103)

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Pending fixes for bugs in the maven-debian-helper package

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 878103 + pending
Bug #878103 [maven-debian-helper] maven-debian-helper: Wrong package name for 
-doc packages
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
878103: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=878103
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

ow-util-ant-tasks REMOVED from testing

[Debian testing watch]

FYI: The status of the ow-util-ant-tasks source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.3.2-4
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

libcodemodel-java REMOVED from testing

[Debian testing watch]

FYI: The status of the libcodemodel-java source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 2.6-1
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

jellydoc REMOVED from testing

[Debian testing watch]

FYI: The status of the jellydoc source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.5-4
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

reproducible.debian.net status changes for jakarta-ecs

[Reproducible builds folks]

2017-10-09 11:12 
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/jakarta-ecs changed 
from reproducible -> FTBFS

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

reproducible.debian.net status changes for libjlatexmath-java

[Reproducible builds folks]

2017-10-09 18:12 
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/libjlatexmath-java 
changed from reproducible -> FTBFS

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

reproducible.debian.net status changes for libj2ssh-java

[Reproducible builds folks]

2017-10-09 18:12 
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/libj2ssh-java 
changed from reproducible -> FTBFS

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

reproducible.debian.net status changes for xom

[Reproducible builds folks]

2017-10-09 19:01 
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/xom changed from 
reproducible -> FTBFS

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

reproducible.debian.net status changes for jmxetric

[Reproducible builds folks]

2017-10-09 18:06 
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/jmxetric changed 
from reproducible -> FTBFS

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

reproducible.debian.net status changes for jenkins-json

[Reproducible builds folks]

2017-10-09 11:14 
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/jenkins-json 
changed from reproducible -> FTBFS

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

reproducible.debian.net status changes for easyconf

[Reproducible builds folks]

2017-10-09 02:34 
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/easyconf changed 
from reproducible -> FTBFS

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

reproducible.debian.net status changes for commons-io

[Reproducible builds folks]

2017-10-09 17:55 
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/commons-io changed 
from reproducible -> FTBFS

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

reproducible.debian.net status changes for gmetric4j

[Reproducible builds folks]

2017-10-09 10:55 
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/gmetric4j changed 
from reproducible -> FTBFS

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

reproducible.debian.net status changes for clirr

[Reproducible builds folks]

2017-10-09 17:46 
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/clirr changed from 
reproducible -> FTBFS

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#878103: maven-debian-helper: Wrong package name for -doc packages

[Christopher Hoskin]

Package: maven-debian-helper
Version: 2.2.5
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

Following commit cafc9403b0da58c789ed95e5d8ff3b165bcde76f, when the
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS variable does not include nodoc, maven-debian-helper
mistakenly uses "1" as the packagename instead of the actual name of the doc
package. A consequence of this is that a file debian/1.substvar is created
instead of debian/-doc.substvar.

The reason for this appears to be that share/perl/maven.pm has the following
modification:

-   $this->{doc_package} = (grep /-doc$/, @packages)[0];
+   $this->{doc_package} = (grep /-doc$/, @packages)[0] && 
(get_buildoption("nodoc") != 1);

When the DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS variable does not include nodoc, 
get_buildoption("nodoc") returns undef and (get_buildoption("nodoc") != 1) 
evaluates to 1. However,
(grep /-doc$/, @packages)[0] && (get_buildoption("nodoc") != 1) evaluates to 1, 
not
to (grep /-doc$/, @packages)[0].

Christopher

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.13.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_GB:en (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages maven-debian-helper depends on:
ii  default-jdk 2:1.8-59
ii  default-jdk-headless2:1.8-59
ii  libmaven-clean-plugin-java  3.0.0-2
ii  libmaven-compiler-plugin-java   3.6.2-2
ii  libmaven-jar-plugin-java3.0.2-2
ii  libmaven-resources-plugin-java  3.0.2-1
ii  libmaven-site-plugin-java   3.6-1
ii  libplexus-velocity-java 1.2-3
ii  libsurefire-java2.20.1-3
ii  libxml2-utils   2.9.4+dfsg1-4
ii  maven   3.5.0-6
ii  maven-repo-helper   1.9.2
ii  unzip   6.0-21
ii  velocity1.7-5

maven-debian-helper recommends no packages.

Versions of packages maven-debian-helper suggests:
ii  apt-file  3.1.4
ii  libmaven-javadoc-plugin-java  3.0.0~M1-4
ii  licensecheck  3.0.31-2
ii  subversion1.9.7-2

-- no debconf information

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#873643: marked as done (FTBFS with Java 9: removed class)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 09 Oct 2017 17:14:55 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#877120: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #873643,
regarding FTBFS with Java 9: removed class
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
873643: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=873643
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libcodemodel-java
Version: 2.6
Severity: normal
User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default-java9
Tags: fixed-upstream

This package fails to build with default-jdk pointing to openjdk-9-jdk.
The wiki has some common problems and their solutions:
https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Java9Pitfalls

It uses a class which has been "removed" in Java 9.
Upstream removed the reference to this class in 2013:
https://github.com/javaee/jaxb-codemodel/commit/03c826c

Please package a new version, or backport the fix.



Build log:

[ERROR] Exit code: 1 - 
/build/libcodemodel-java-2.6/codemodel/src/main/java/com/sun/codemodel/util/SingleByteEncoder.java:53:
 error: package sun.nio.cs is not visible
[ERROR] import sun.nio.cs.Surrogate;
[ERROR]   ^
[ERROR]   (package sun.nio.cs is declared in module java.base, which does not 
export it to the unnamed module)


Cheers,
Chris.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.6-1+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package libcodemodel-java has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/877120

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#654123: marked as done (Updating the ow-util-ant-tasks Uploaders list)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 09 Oct 2017 17:12:43 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#876971: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #654123,
regarding Updating the ow-util-ant-tasks Uploaders list
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
654123: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=654123
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ow-util-ant-tasks
Version: 1.3.2-4
Severity: minor
User: m...@qa.debian.org
Usertags: mia-teammaint

Michael Koch  has not been working on
the ow-util-ant-tasks package for quite some time.

We are tracking their status in the MIA team and would like to ask you
to remove them from the Uploaders list of the package so we can close
that part of the file.

(If the person is listed as Maintainer, what we are asking is to please
step in as a new maintainer.)

Thanks.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.3.2-4+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package ow-util-ant-tasks has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/876971

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#800867: marked as done (ow-util-ant-tasks: depends on obsolete libasm3-java library)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 09 Oct 2017 17:12:43 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#876971: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #800867,
regarding ow-util-ant-tasks: depends on obsolete libasm3-java library
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
800867: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=800867
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ow-util-ant-tasks
Severity: important
User: pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: oldlibs libasm3-java

Hi,

ow-util-ant-tasks depends on libasm3-java, which is obsolete and
incompatible with Java 8 which will be the new default in the near
future. ow-util-ant-tasks should be ported to the new libasm4-java
version, so that we can remove the old, unmaintained one.

Please try to do this before the Stretch release as we are going to
try to remove libasm3-java this cycle.

We will bump this issue to serious when the list of rdeps is small
and we are getting ready to remove libasm3-java completely.

If you have any questions don't hesitate to ask and contact us on

debian-j...@lists.debian.org

Regards,

Markus
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.3.2-4+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package ow-util-ant-tasks has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/876971

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#874156: marked as done (FTBFS with Java 9: ambiguous put())

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 09 Oct 2017 17:12:43 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#876971: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #874156,
regarding FTBFS with Java 9: ambiguous put()
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
874156: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=874156
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ow-util-ant-tasks
Version: 1.3.2
Severity: normal
User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default-java9

This package fails to build with default-jdk pointing to openjdk-9-jdk.
Please fix it, so that we can start the transition to Java 9.
The wiki has some common problems and their solutions:
https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Java9Pitfalls

This is probably due to 1.6 related generics changes,
or because an interface gained a new method. In either case,
the code needs fixing.

Build log:

[javac] 
/build/ow-util-ant-tasks-1.3.2/src/org/objectweb/util/ant/MultipleCopy.java:80: 
error: no suitable method found for put(String,String)
[javac] 
fileCopyMap.put(file.getAbsolutePath(), destFile.getAbsolutePath());
[javac]^
[javac] method Map.put(String,String[]) is not applicable
[javac]   (argument mismatch; String cannot be converted to String[])
[javac] method Dictionary.put(String,String[]) is not applicable
[javac]   (argument mismatch; String cannot be converted to String[])
[javac] method Hashtable.put(String,String[]) is not applicable
[javac]   (argument mismatch; String cannot be converted to String[])
[javac] 
/build/ow-util-ant-tasks-1.3.2/src/org/objectweb/util/ant/MultipleCopy.java:88: 
error: no suitable method found for put(String,String)
[javac]   
fileCopyMap.put(file.getAbsolutePath(), destFile.getAbsolutePath());
[javac]  ^
[javac] method Map.put(String,String[]) is not applicable
[javac]   (argument mismatch; String cannot be converted to String[])
[javac] method Dictionary.put(String,String[]) is not applicable
[javac]   (argument mismatch; String cannot be converted to String[])
[javac] method Hashtable.put(String,String[]) is not applicable
[javac]   (argument mismatch; String cannot be converted to String[])
[javac] Note: Some input files use unchecked or unsafe operations.
[javac] Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details.
[javac] 2 errors
[javac] 9 warnings



Cheers,
Chris.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.3.2-4+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package ow-util-ant-tasks has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/876971

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#877121: Removed package(s) from unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

libxsom-java | 0+20110809-1 | all
  xsom | 0+20110809-1 | source

--- Reason ---
ROM; Binary package moved to src:jaxb
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed
correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 877...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/877121

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#877120: Removed package(s) from unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

Version: 2.6-1+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package libcodemodel-java has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/877120

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#877120: Removed package(s) from unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

libcodemodel-java |  2.6-1 | source, all
libcodemodel-java-doc |  2.6-1 | all

--- Reason ---
ROM; Binary package moved to src:jaxb
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed
correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 877...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/877120

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#877119: Removed package(s) from unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

libtxw2-java | 0.1+20110809-1 | all
  txw2 | 0.1+20110809-1 | source

--- Reason ---
ROM; Binary package moved to src:jaxb
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed
correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 877...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/877119

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#877118: Removed package(s) from unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

librngom-java | 0+201103+svn20110406-1 | all
 rngom | 0+201103+svn20110406-1 | source

--- Reason ---
ROM; Binary package moved to src:jaxb
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed
correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 877...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/877118

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#876971: Removed package(s) from unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

Version: 1.3.2-4+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package ow-util-ant-tasks has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/876971

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#877052: Removed package(s) from unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

  jellydoc |  1.5-4 | source
libjellydoc-java |  1.5-4 | all
libjellydoc-java-doc |  1.5-4 | all

--- Reason ---
ROM; No longer used
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed
correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 877...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/877052

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#876971: Removed package(s) from unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

libow-util-ant-tasks-java |1.3.2-4 | all
libow-util-ant-tasks-java-doc |1.3.2-4 | all
ow-util-ant-tasks |1.3.2-4 | source

--- Reason ---
ROM; Obsolete, no longer used
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed
correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 876...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/876971

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#877470: Question about strip-nondeterminism in bsh

[Chris Lamb]

[Adding 877...@bugs.debian.org to CC]

Hi jathan,

> Also I want to ask you what does it mean you actually use
> /usr/share/dpkg/pkg-info.mk for SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH

See, for example:

  https://github.com/lamby/pkg-python-daiquiri/blob/debian/sid/debian/rules#L3

If you take a look at the /usr/share/dpkg/pkg-info.mk file itself,
it should be fairly clear what it exports to the outside environment.

In the python-daiquiri example, I'm using DEB_VERSION_UPSTREAM for a
reproducibility-related reason, but you should be able to see how it
applies to SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH too :)

> Thanks a lot and sorry for my delay to reply,

No worries about the delay. Note that I've added 877...@bugs.debian.org to
the CC; generally when a question pertains to a specific bug, it's a great
idea to ensure that the conversation is archived there. Keeps everyone sane
too as it's easy to "load" context after a few days/weeks. :)


Best wishes,

-- 
  ,''`.
 : :'  : Chris Lamb
 `. `'`  la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
   `-

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.