jetty_6.1.18-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi. /usr/share/common-licenses/BSD is the 3-clause BSD license, you can only reference it if a 3-clause BSD license is used, which doesn't seem to be the case here. Gruesse, Frank === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: freemind_0.9.0~rc1-2_amd64.changes REJECTED
On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 04:35:33PM +0200, Eric Lavarde wrote:
Files: ./accessories/to{x,}html.xsl ./accessories/marktree.js
Copyright: Miika Nurminen (minur...@cc.jyu.fi) 2003, 2004
License: Mozilla 1.1
The contents of this file are subject to the Mozilla Public License Version
1.1 (the License); you may not use this file except in compliance with
the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/
I don't know why I forgot to mention it in my REJECT, but this is of course
not allowed. Licenses need to be included with their full text except for
the /usr/share/common-licenses/ stuff.
Gruesse.
--
Frank Lichtenheld dj...@debian.org
www: http://www.djpig.de/
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
freemind_0.9.0~rc1-2_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi. Still some issues with the copyright file: * The GNU Classpath extension is mentioned but not included in the copyright file. * Some of the file you mention as copyright unknown have license statements in separate files: e.g. freemind/plugins/latex/Readme.txt for JZoomedHotEqn.java * There is also freemind/plugins/script/groovy-all-1.5.6-LICENSE.txt which presumably belongs to some file, but I can't see which Gruesse, Frank === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
freemind_0.9.0~rc1-1_i386.changes REJECTED
Hi. accessoires/ contains some files with differing copyrights and licenses, e.g. under the MPL 1.1, whihc is not mentioned at all in debian/copyright. Gruesse, Frank === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
substance_5.0-3_i386.changes REJECTED
There are several licensing problems here: * from debian/copyright it is unclear what the MPL applies to, it should be made clear that this applies to src/contrib/net/xoetrope/editor/ and the copyright holder should be noted. * I don't believe that the images in src/tools/docrobot/watermarks/ are DFSG-licensed. I could be wrong, but I doubt it. * You link to /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL for Quaqua, but the license terms have no explicit or later term and the version included in the distribution is 2.1. So this should better link to LGPL-2.1. * Statements like Artwork --- The artwork used by the Quaqua Look and Feel is copyright Apple Computer Inc. Use of the artwork is only licensed for Apple hardware running an Apple operating system. don't sound DFSG-free. * Same for Copyright (DefaultPalettes.java): Apple Computer Inc., All rights reserved. Microsoft Inc., All rights reserved. Gruesse, Frank === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Comments regarding libjibx-java_1.0.2-1_i386.changes
Hi. debian/copyright misses a note about: ./build/src/org/jibx/binding/ant/CompileTask.java:Copyright (c) 2003, Andrew J. Glover also I'm confused because ./docs/jibx-license.html mentions other code that is included under differing licenses but I wasn't able to find this code in the source. It would be nice to include a statement about this in debian/copyright as well. I will accept the package, since I don't think these issues warrant a reject, but it would be good if you addressed them in your next upload. Gruesse, Frank ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Comments regarding maven-plugin-tools_2.4.3-1_i386.changes
This build-depends on libmaven-plugin-tools-java, i.e. itself. Is that really necessary? ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Comments regarding plexus-containers_1.0~beta2-1_i386.changes
Isn't libplexus-containers-java missing a Depends field? ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Comments regarding maven-reporting-impl_2.0.4.1-1_i386.changes
Homepage: http://maven.apache.org/doxia/ Vcs-Browser: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-java/trunk/doxia Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-java/trunk/doxia Looks like copypaste artifacts too me. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Comments regarding plexus-interpolation_1.7-1_i386.changes
This package depends on default-java which I can't seem to find anywhere? Did you mean default-jre, or default-jdk? ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#499288: Orphan
reassign 499288 wnpp retitle 499288 O: argouml -- modelling tool to help you do your design using UML severity 499288 normal thanks Hi, Since the status did not improve since this bug report was sent and the maintainer never answered, I'm orphaning the package as originally suggested. Thank you, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ http://blog.djpig.de/ ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#499288: argouml: should this package be orphaned?
Package: argouml Version: 0.19.6-2.1 Severity: important User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-orphan Dear Maintainer, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: * RC bug open for nearly a year without maintainer activity * last maintainer upload in 2005 * several bugs tagged pending for over a year If you think that it should be removed from Debian instead of being orphaned, please reply to this bug and tell so. If you disagree and want to continue to maintain this package, please close this bug and do an upload also fixing the other issues. Also, you can study the possibility of taking co-maintainers. If you agree that it should be orphaned, send the following commands to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (replace nn with this bug's number): severity nn normal reassign nn wnpp retitle nn O: packagename -- short package description thanks If you think it should be removed, send the following commands instead: severity nn normal reassign nn ftp.debian.org retitle nn RM: packagename -- RoM; reasons thanks For more information, see http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-archive-manip http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ Thank you, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#489952: RM: libsaxon-java-gcj [alpha hppa] -- ANAIS, RoQA; missing java support
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal The usual: Java support not available on alpha and hppa, so binaries need to be removed. Gruesse, Frank Lichtenheld -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#480776: cacao_0.99~rc5-1(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: C compiler cannot create executables
Package: cacao
Version: 0.99~rc5-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package failed to build from source.
The reason seems to be that configure tries to compile an executable
with -m64 which fails since gcc-multilib isn't installed. I have no
idea _why_ it tries that, though.
config.log is attached.
| Automatic build of cacao_0.99~rc5-1 on njoerd by sbuild/sparc 98-farm
| Build started at 20080512-0001
| **
| Checking available source versions...
| Fetching source files...
| Reading package lists...
| Building dependency tree...
| Need to get 3599kB of source archives.
| Get:1 http://sinclair.farm.ftbfs.de experimental/main cacao 0.99~rc5-1 (dsc)
[1338B]
| Get:2 http://sinclair.farm.ftbfs.de experimental/main cacao 0.99~rc5-1 (tar)
[3588kB]
| Get:3 http://sinclair.farm.ftbfs.de experimental/main cacao 0.99~rc5-1 (diff)
[9145B]
| Fetched 3599kB in 0s (3969kB/s)
| Download complete and in download only mode
| ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
| Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5), cdbs (= 0.4.17), default-jdk-builddep,
classpath (= 2:0.96.1), classpath-common (= 2:0.96.1), zlib1g-dev,
libltdl3-dev, zip
| Checking for already installed source dependencies...
[...]
| cd . CC=cc CXX=g++ CFLAGS=-g -O2 -g -Wall -O2 CXXFLAGS=-g -O2 -g
-Wall -O2 CPPFLAGS= LDFLAGS= JAVAC=/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/bin/javac
LDFLAGS= -Wl,-z,defs /build/buildd/cacao-0.99~rc5/./configure
--build=sparc-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr --includedir=\${prefix}/include
--mandir=\${prefix}/share/man --infodir=\${prefix}/share/info
--sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var --libexecdir=\${prefix}/lib/cacao
--disable-maintainer-mode --disable-dependency-tracking --srcdir=.
--with-classpath-prefix=/usr --with-classpath-includedir=/usr/include/classpath
--disable-disassembler --libdir=/usr/lib/cacao
--with-jni_h=/usr/include/classpath --with-jni_md_h=/usr/include/classpath
| checking build system type... sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
| checking host system type... sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
| checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
| checking whether build environment is sane... yes
| checking for gawk... no
| checking for mawk... mawk
| checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
| checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no
| checking for gcc... cc
| checking for C compiler default output file name...
| configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
| See `config.log' for more details.
| make: *** [config.status] Error 77
| dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
| **
| Build finished at 20080512-0006
| FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
Full build log(s):
http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?ver=0.99~rc5-1pkg=cacaoarch=sparc
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
This file contains any messages produced by compilers while
running configure, to aid debugging if configure makes a mistake.
It was created by cacao configure 0.99rc5, which was
generated by GNU Autoconf 2.61. Invocation command line was
$ /build/buildd/cacao-0.99~rc5/./configure --build=sparc-linux-gnu
--prefix=/usr --includedir=${prefix}/include --mandir=${prefix}/share/man
--infodir=${prefix}/share/info --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var
--libexecdir=${prefix}/lib/cacao --disable-maintainer-mode
--disable-dependency-tracking --srcdir=. --with-classpath-prefix=/usr
--with-classpath-includedir=/usr/include/classpath --disable-disassembler
--libdir=/usr/lib/cacao --with-jni_h=/usr/include/classpath
--with-jni_md_h=/usr/include/classpath
## - ##
## Platform. ##
## - ##
hostname = njoerd
uname -m = sparc
uname -r = 2.6.18-6-sparc64-smp
uname -s = Linux
uname -v = #1 SMP Tue Feb 12 22:37:04 UTC 2008
/usr/bin/uname -p = unknown
/bin/uname -X = unknown
/bin/arch = unknown
/usr/bin/arch -k = unknown
/usr/convex/getsysinfo = unknown
/usr/bin/hostinfo = unknown
/bin/machine = unknown
/usr/bin/oslevel = unknown
/bin/universe = unknown
PATH: /usr/local/sbin
PATH: /usr/local/bin
PATH: /usr/sbin
PATH: /usr/bin
PATH: /sbin
PATH: /bin
PATH: /usr/X11R6/bin
PATH: /usr/games
## --- ##
## Core tests. ##
## --- ##
configure:2167: checking build system type
configure:2185: result: sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
configure:2207: checking host system type
configure:: result: sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
configure:2259: checking for a BSD-compatible install
configure:2315: result: /usr/bin/install -c
configure:2326: checking whether build environment is sane
configure:2369: result: yes
configure:2434: checking for gawk
configure:2464: result: no
configure:2434: checking for mawk
configure:2450: found /usr/bin/mawk
configure:2461: result: mawk
configure:2472: checking whether make sets $(MAKE)
configure:2493: result: yes
Bug#479529: cacao_0.99~rc3-1(mips/experimental): FTBFS: Error: opcode not supported on this processor
]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/cacao-0.99~rc3' | make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 | make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/cacao-0.99~rc3' | make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2 | dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 | ** | Build finished at 20080505-0258 | FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Full build log(s): http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?ver=0.99~rc3-1pkg=cacaoarch=mips Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#479529: cacao_0.99~rc3-1(mips/experimental): FTBFS: Error: opcode not supported on this processor
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 01:44:21PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote: On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 12:45:57PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: | cc -I../../../../src -I../../../.. -I../../../../src -D__MIPS__ -D__LINUX__ -ansi -pedantic -Wall -Wno-long-long -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199506L -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED -D_BSD_SOURCE -g -O2 -g -Wall -O2 -c asmpart.S -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/asmpart.o | asmpart.S: Assembler messages: | asmpart.S:166: Error: opcode not supported on this processor: mips1 (mips1) `ldc1 $f12,4*8($8)' | asmpart.S:167: Error: opcode not supported on this processor: mips1 (mips1) `ldc1 $f14,5*8($8)' | asmpart.S:241: Warning: No .cprestore pseudo-op used in PIC code | asmpart.S:280: Warning: No .cprestore pseudo-op used in PIC code | asmpart.S:305: Error: opcode not supported on this processor: mips1 (mips1) `sdc1 $f12,(4+(0))*4($29)' | asmpart.S:305: Error: opcode not supported on this processor: mips1 (mips1) `sdc1 $f14,(6+(0))*4($29)' | asmpart.S:306: Error: opcode not supported on this processor: mips1 (mips1) `sdc1 $f8,(8+((4+2)))*4($29)' | asmpart.S:306: Error: opcode not supported on this processor: mips1 (mips1) `sdc1 $f10,(10+((4+2)))*4($29)' | asmpart.S:306: Error: opcode not supported on this processor: mips1 (mips1) `sdc1 $f16,(12+((4+2)))*4($29)' | asmpart.S:306: Error: opcode not supported on this processor: mips1 (mips1) `sdc1 $f18,(14+((4+2)))*4($29)' | asmpart.S:336: Warning: No .cprestore pseudo-op used in PIC code | asmpart.S:358: Error: opcode not supported on this processor: mips1 (mips1) `ldc1 $f12,(4+(0))*4($29)' | asmpart.S:358: Error: opcode not supported on this processor: mips1 (mips1) `ldc1 $f14,(6+(0))*4($29)' | asmpart.S:359: Error: opcode not supported on this processor: mips1 (mips1) `ldc1 $f8,(8+((4+2)))*4($29)' | asmpart.S:359: Error: opcode not supported on this processor: mips1 (mips1) `ldc1 $f10,(10+((4+2)))*4($29)' | asmpart.S:359: Error: opcode not supported on this processor: mips1 (mips1) `ldc1 $f16,(12+((4+2)))*4($29)' | asmpart.S:359: Error: opcode not supported on this processor: mips1 (mips1) `ldc1 $f18,(14+((4+2)))*4($29)' | asmpart.S:430: Error: opcode not supported on this processor: mips1 (mips1) `ldc1 $f20,-4*8($9)' | asmpart.S:431: Error: opcode not supported on this processor: mips1 (mips1) `ldc1 $f22,-3*8($9)' | asmpart.S:432: Error: opcode not supported on this processor: mips1 (mips1) `ldc1 $f24,-2*8($9)' | asmpart.S:433: Error: opcode not supported on this processor: mips1 (mips1) `ldc1 $f26,-1*8($9)' | asmpart.S:434: Error: opcode not supported on this processor: mips1 (mips1) `ldc1 $f28,-1*8($9)' | asmpart.S:435: Error: opcode not supported on this processor: mips1 (mips1) `ldc1 $f30,-1*8($9)' | asmpart.S:460: Warning: No .cprestore pseudo-op used in PIC code | asmpart.S:475: Error: opcode not supported on this processor: mips1 (mips1) `ll $2,0($4)' | asmpart.S:478: Error: opcode not supported on this processor: mips1 (mips1) `sc $8,0($4)' | asmpart.S:481: Error: opcode not supported on this processor: mips1 (mips1) `sync' | make[7]: *** [asmpart.lo] Error 1 | make[7]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/cacao-0.99~rc3/src/vm/jit/mips' | make[6]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 | make[6]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/cacao-0.99~rc3/src/vm/jit/mips' | make[5]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 | make[5]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/cacao-0.99~rc3/src/vm/jit' | make[4]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 | make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/cacao-0.99~rc3/src/vm' | make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 | make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/cacao-0.99~rc3/src' | make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 | make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/cacao-0.99~rc3' | make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 | make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/cacao-0.99~rc3' | make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2 | dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 | ** | Build finished at 20080505-0258 | FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Full build log(s): http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?ver=0.99~rc3-1pkg=cacaoarch=mips Upstream told me that this code needs CFLAGS=-mips2. Is this allowed on mips? Are we expected to support mips1 machines? I honestly have no idea. Redirecting the question to the mips list. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#477317: cacao_0.99~rc1-1(mips/experimental): FTBFS: error: 'CTX_EPC' undeclared
Package: cacao Version: 0.99~rc1-1 Severity: important Hi, your package failed to build from source. | Automatic build of cacao_0.99~rc1-1 on signy by sbuild/mips 98-farm | Build started at 20080422-0953 | ** | Checking available source versions... | Fetching source files... | Reading package lists... | Building dependency tree... | Need to get 3533kB of source archives. | Get:1 http://sinclair.farm.ftbfs.de experimental/main cacao 0.99~rc1-1 (dsc) [955B] | Get:2 http://sinclair.farm.ftbfs.de experimental/main cacao 0.99~rc1-1 (tar) [3523kB] | Get:3 http://sinclair.farm.ftbfs.de experimental/main cacao 0.99~rc1-1 (diff) [8788B] | Fetched 3533kB in 4s (735kB/s) | Download complete and in download only mode | ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: | Build-Depends: cdbs (= 0.4.17), classpath (= 2:0.96.1), classpath-common (= 2:0.96.1), debhelper (= 5), java-gcj-compat-dev, libltdl3-dev, zip, zlib1g-dev | Checking for already installed source dependencies... [...] | cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../../.. -I../../../../../src -I../../../../../src/vm/jit/mips -I../../../../../src -D__MIPS__ -D__LINUX__ -ansi -pedantic -Wall -Wno-long-long -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199506L -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT -g -O2 -g -Wall -O2 -c md-os.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/md-os.o | md-os.c: In function 'md_signal_handler_sigsegv': | md-os.c:148: error: 'CTX_EPC' undeclared (first use in this function) | md-os.c:148: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once | md-os.c:148: error: for each function it appears in.) | md-os.c:97: warning: unused variable 'cause' | make[7]: *** [md-os.lo] Error 1 | make[7]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/cacao-0.99~rc1/src/vm/jit/mips/linux' | make[6]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 | make[6]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/cacao-0.99~rc1/src/vm/jit/mips' | make[5]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 | make[5]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/cacao-0.99~rc1/src/vm/jit' | make[4]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 | make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/cacao-0.99~rc1/src/vm' | make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 | make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/cacao-0.99~rc1/src' | make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 | make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/cacao-0.99~rc1' | make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 | make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/cacao-0.99~rc1' | make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2 | dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 | ** | Build finished at 20080422-1139 | FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Full build log(s): http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?ver=0.99~rc1-1pkg=cacaoarch=mips Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#448381: flutejava_1.3-2(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: dh_nativejava fails
Package: flutejava
Version: 1.3-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package failed to build from source. The failure seems to appear on
every architecture.
| Automatic build of flutejava_1.3-2 on odin by sbuild/sparc 98-farm
| Build started at 20071026-0914
| **
| Checking available source versions...
| Fetching source files...
| Reading package lists...
| Building dependency tree...
| Need to get 176kB of source archives.
| Get:1 http://sinclair.farm.ftbfs.de experimental/main flutejava 1.3-2 (dsc)
[800B]
| Get:2 http://sinclair.farm.ftbfs.de experimental/main flutejava 1.3-2 (tar)
[172kB]
| Get:3 http://sinclair.farm.ftbfs.de experimental/main flutejava 1.3-2 (diff)
[3026B]
| Fetched 176kB in 0s (1313kB/s)
| Download complete and in download only mode
| ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
| Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5), java-gcj-compat-dev, libsac-java, javacc
| Checking for already installed source dependencies...
[...]
| /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch
| dh_testdir
| dh_testroot
| dh_clean -k
| dh_installdirs
| dh_install
| dh_testdir
| dh_testroot
| dh_installchangelogs -s
| dh_installdocs -s
| dh_link -s
| dh_nativejava -s -plibflute-java-gcj
| Traceback (most recent call last):
| File /usr/bin/aot-compile, line 95, in ?
| compiler.compile()
| File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/aotcompile.py, line 99, in compile
| self.writeMakefile(MAKEFILE, jobs)
| File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/aotcompile.py, line 119, in
writeMakefile
| print fp, MAKEFILE_HEADER % {
| TypeError: reduce() of empty sequence with no initial value
| dh_nativejava: command returned error code 256
| make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1
| dpkg-buildpackage: failure: /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch gave
error exit status 2
| **
| Build finished at 20071026-0918
| FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
Full build log(s):
http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?ver=1.3-2pkg=flutejavaarch=sparc
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
