[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of node-es5-shim_4.2.0-1_source.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

node-es5-shim_4.2.0-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  node-es5-shim_4.2.0-1.dsc
  node-es5-shim_4.2.0.orig.tar.gz
  node-es5-shim_4.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#742347: Bug#742347: tilemill vs mapbox studio?

[Antoine Beaupré]

On 2015-11-05 09:52:19, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> The openstreetmap-carto developers have mostly switched to kosmtic:
>
> https://github.com/kosmtik/kosmtik

is that a fork of tilemill? how does it differ?

maybe a new ITP should be opened for this then?

-- 
C'est avec les pierres de la loi qu'on a bâti les prisons,
et avec les briques de la religion, les bordels.
- Blake, William

___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#742347: Bug#742347: tilemill vs mapbox studio?

[Bas Couwenberg]

On 2015-11-05 16:59, Antoine Beaupré wrote:

On 2015-11-05 09:52:19, Bas Couwenberg wrote:

The openstreetmap-carto developers have mostly switched to kosmtic:

https://github.com/kosmtik/kosmtik


is that a fork of tilemill? how does it differ?


It's not a fork. It's not a Mapbox project.


maybe a new ITP should be opened for this then?


It's still alpha, but shows much more promise than mapbox-studio as an 
alternative to tilemill.


If you want to spend time packaging an alternative for tilemill, I think 
kosmtik is your best option.


Kind Regards,

Bas

___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#742347: Bug#742347: tilemill vs mapbox studio?

[Jérémy Lal]

2015-11-05 17:04 GMT+01:00 Bas Couwenberg :

> On 2015-11-05 16:59, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>
>> On 2015-11-05 09:52:19, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>
>>> The openstreetmap-carto developers have mostly switched to kosmtic:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/kosmtik/kosmtik
>>>
>>
>> is that a fork of tilemill? how does it differ?
>>
>
> It's not a fork. It's not a Mapbox project.
>
> maybe a new ITP should be opened for this then?
>>
>
> It's still alpha, but shows much more promise than mapbox-studio as an
> alternative to tilemill.
>
> If you want to spend time packaging an alternative for tilemill, I think
> kosmtik is your best option.
>
>
Indeed it looks like an alternative to tilemill.
Mapbox studio classic is not really as good, and to be released mapbox
studio (but i don't know when)
is very promising.


Jérémy
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#742347: tilemill vs mapbox studio?

[Antoine Beaupré]

This are moving fast out there. Mapbox folks have released a new product
in september 2014 named "Mapbox studio classic":

https://www.mapbox.com/mapbox-studio-classic/#linux

The code is still free:

https://github.com/mapbox/mapbox-studio-classic

It seems to be a fork of tilemill:

https://github.com/mapbox/mapbox-studio-classic/blob/mb-pages/docs/-01-01-common-questions.md#how-is-mapbox-studio-related-to-tilemill#user-content-how-is-mapbox-studio-classic-related-to-tilemill

It looks like there's some sort of mapbox.com locking however:

https://github.com/mapbox/mapbox-studio-classic/blob/mb-pages/docs/-01-01-common-questions.md#can-i-use-git-with-a-style-or-source-project

And there are certainly new copyright issues, if only with the bundled
fonts:

https://github.com/mapbox/mapbox-studio-classic/blob/mb-pages/docs/-01-01-common-questions.md#what-cancant-i-do-with-pro-fonts

Then there's mapbox studio:

https://www.mapbox.com/mapbox-studio/

... which is basically a web rewrite of mapbox:

https://www.mapbox.com/help/upgrading-from-classic/

It's currently in private beta, so not much use there.

But it may be worthwhile to wait a while before doing any more work
here...

A.

-- 
The lazy man does not stand in the way of progress. When he sees
progress roaring down upon him he steps nimbly out of the way
 - Christopher Morley, "On Laziness"

___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#742347: Bug#742347: tilemill vs mapbox studio?

[Bas Couwenberg]

The openstreetmap-carto developers have mostly switched to kosmtic:

https://github.com/kosmtik/kosmtik

___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel