[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#585456: [digikam] please don't depend on marble-data

2014-05-27 Thread Filipus Klutiero

On 2013-12-16 08:44, Filipus Klutiero wrote:

[...]



On my not-so-bare KDE install, installing Digikam (without disabling 
recommends) caused a 71 MB download and required 231 MB more of storage.


With 4.0.0, I'm now getting 73 MB / 254 MB...

By the way, #542951 also requests reducing dependencies.

--
Filipus Klutiero
http://www.philippecloutier.com

___
pkg-kde-extras mailing list
pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras


[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#585456: [digikam] please don't depend on marble-data

2013-12-16 Thread Filipus Klutiero

Hi Mark,

On 2013-11-08 18:36, Mark Purcell wrote:

tags 585456 wontfix
affects 585456 marble-data
quit

On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 12:55:41 Filipus Klutiero wrote:

digikam depends on marble-data through a Depends on libmarblewidget.
marble is used for geolocation, which is not used by most people

Filipus,

I view geolocation to be a core function for digikam, so wont disable this
capability.


I don't consider geolocation a *core* function, but geolocation certainly has 
great potential. I'm sorry for the brief report, I didn't mean this as a 
request to disable geolocation at all.

I should say I do not own a camera. Once every year or 2, I'll install Digikam 
to import photos from a relative's device. Digikam has never been lightweight, 
but with recent versions, it's gotten fatter. On my not-so-bare KDE install, 
installing Digikam (without disabling recommends) caused a 71 MB download and 
required 231 MB more of storage.

I'm sure people who love photography find Digikam's development great, but 
there may be a fair share of small users who would prefer that new features 
don't *necessarily* increase storage requirements much. I would love to see 
kde-standard bring digikam, but that's hard to imagine with the current 
dependencies set.



Perhaps there is a way for marble-data to be reduced in size?

Mark


marble-data is now a 13 MB download which takes 23 MB uncompressed. I am neither 
knowledgeable on Digikam or on Marble, but I took a quick look. marble-data contains more 
stuff than I imagined. Maps, icons, sounds, and map data. If I understand correctly, 
marble-data is mostly used for the Marble Virtual Globe's "Atlas map" type. 
From what I saw, it looks like Digikam doesn't need marble/data/maps/. That directory is 
7 MB though, not a huge gain. On the other hand, the Atlas map is very minimal. I'm not 
seeing a city of 10 000, and that doesn't look at all like an exception. Therefore, the 
sizeable marble-data seems to only provide a map of minimal quality. Even locating a 
picture in the right city would seem difficult with the Atlas map.

Digikam offers 2 "backends" - Google Maps and Marble Virtual Globe. Marble Virtual Globe 
has 2 "types", Atlas map and OpenStreetMap. I imagine that the Google Maps backend 
requires connectivity, and Marble Virtual Globe's OpenStreetMap visibly does too. By default, 
Digikam uses the Atlas map. I wonder how hard it would be to have Digikam keep offering Geolocation 
unconditionally, but only offer the Atlas map when marble-data is installed.

--
Filipus Klutiero
http://www.philippecloutier.com

___
pkg-kde-extras mailing list
pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras


[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#585456: [digikam] please don't depend on marble-data

2010-06-10 Thread Filipus Klutiero

Package: digikam
Version: 2:1.2.0-2
Severity: wishlist

digikam depends on marble-data through a Depends on libmarblewidget. 
marble is used for geolocation, which is not used by most people:

http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/extragear/graphics/digikam/README?view=markup&sortby=date

marble-data is 21 MB and a 12 MB download. libmarblewidget is 2 MB.



___
pkg-kde-extras mailing list
pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras