Re: Qt/KDE team news

[Ana Guerrero]

On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:49:52PM +0200, Kai Wasserbäch wrote:
 Dear fellow Qt/KDE team members,
 inspired by what Cyril Brulebois' DXN posts about news in the X world, I was
 wondering whether we wouldn't want the same for Qt/KDE? I'd volunteer to write
 these news, but would rely on you to point me to interesting bits and pieces 
 (if
 you have some polished text ready, I won't complain ;) ), just drop me a note 
 at
 [0] and it'll be part of the next news post. As Cyril I'd post this on my blog
 (available at [1]), which is planet.d.o syndicated and should reach a lot of 
 people.
 
 Let me know whether you find this a good idea or not. If the general opinion 
 is
 in favour I'd start the series with a post about dhmk and getting rid of Qt3 
 in
 a few days, if you have other stuff you'd like to see in that post, write to 
 [0].
 If the majority of you think this is a bad idea, I won't proceed.


We are not getting rid of Qt3, we are giving up to adoption. This should be
done via a mail to debian-devel@ although you can of course blog after that!

I am planning to do a blog post about the kdelibs removal once arts is out
with some numbers. But it won't be in the next 2 weeks.


Ana

--
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk

Re: Qt/KDE team news

[Kai Wasserbäch]

[Please don't CC me, I'm subscribed and per Debian ML policy didn't request to
be CCed.]

Dear Ana,
Ana Guerrero schrieb am 19.04.2011 13:45:
 On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:49:52PM +0200, Kai Wasserbäch wrote:
 […] I'd start the series with a post about dhmk and getting rid of Qt3 in
 a few days […]
 
 We are not getting rid of Qt3, we are giving up to adoption. This should be
 done via a mail to debian-devel@ although you can of course blog after that!

we – as a team – get rid of it. That it was going to be given up for adoption
was clear to me, even though I agree, that my initial wording wasn't clear on
this. And I never intended to replace the official announcement (O: mail) to
debian-devel. I thought of it more as a wider-audience heads-up, maybe even
reaching some upstream developers of (scientific) applications and getting them
to switch to Qt4.

 I am planning to do a blog post about the kdelibs removal once arts is out
 with some numbers. But it won't be in the next 2 weeks.

If you already blog about (all) this, no need for me to do it too. I was just
missing some semi-regular KDE/Qt news on p.d.o to give the KDE/Qt stuff some
more visibility. But since Lisandro already pointed out, that you do/did these
kind of things, I'll defer to you. Let me know, by when you would need the piece
about dhmk to be included in your post and I see what I can do.

Kind regards,
Kai Wasserbäch



-- 

E-Mail: cu...@debian.org
IRC: Curan
Jabber: dri...@debianforum.de
URL: http://wiki.debian.org/C%C3%B9ran
GnuPG: 0xE1DE59D2  0600 96CE F3C8 E733 E5B6 1587 A309 D76C E1DE 59D2



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk