Re: Getting QtWebChannel ready for upload

2016-07-28 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
[snip]
> Use of the machine readable copyright format is entirely optional.  It's
> encouraged, thus the lintian check, but it's not a problem if it's not
> machine readable.

I must admit I tend to forget this because I prefer structured things, but 
this is of course totally right.


-- 
Una vez que hemos eliminado lo imposible, lo que queda, por improbable que
parezca, es la verdad.
  Sherlock Holmes

Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- 
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk

Re: Getting QtWebChannel ready for upload

2016-07-28 Thread Sandro Knauß
Hey Dmitry,

> On Debian this should be nodejs rather that node (see #614907).

Oh thanks for this notice. But changing the node -> nodejs results now in 
another lintian warning:
W: qtwebchannel-examples: script-not-executable usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/
examples/webchannel/qwclient/qwclient.js

the env line is:
#/usr/bin/env nodejs


regards,

sandro


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- 
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk