Re: Qt/KDE team news
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 03:51:12PM +0200, Kai Wasserbäch wrote: judging from Ana's reply to my initial e-mail she is going to continue to do this kind of blog posts. Thus I won't proceed with my idea and focus on passing bits and pieces for inclusion in such posts on to her. No, no. I will blog about the stuff I have done and removing what is left of KDE3. I barely have followed the KDE packaging lately and I am not planning to blog about this. -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
Re: Qt/KDE team news
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:49:52PM +0200, Kai Wasserbäch wrote: Dear fellow Qt/KDE team members, inspired by what Cyril Brulebois' DXN posts about news in the X world, I was wondering whether we wouldn't want the same for Qt/KDE? I'd volunteer to write these news, but would rely on you to point me to interesting bits and pieces (if you have some polished text ready, I won't complain ;) ), just drop me a note at [0] and it'll be part of the next news post. As Cyril I'd post this on my blog (available at [1]), which is planet.d.o syndicated and should reach a lot of people. Let me know whether you find this a good idea or not. If the general opinion is in favour I'd start the series with a post about dhmk and getting rid of Qt3 in a few days, if you have other stuff you'd like to see in that post, write to [0]. If the majority of you think this is a bad idea, I won't proceed. We are not getting rid of Qt3, we are giving up to adoption. This should be done via a mail to debian-devel@ although you can of course blog after that! I am planning to do a blog post about the kdelibs removal once arts is out with some numbers. But it won't be in the next 2 weeks. Ana -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
Re: Qt/KDE team news
[Please don't CC me, I'm subscribed and per Debian ML policy didn't request to be CCed.] Dear Ana, Ana Guerrero schrieb am 19.04.2011 13:45: On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:49:52PM +0200, Kai Wasserbäch wrote: […] I'd start the series with a post about dhmk and getting rid of Qt3 in a few days […] We are not getting rid of Qt3, we are giving up to adoption. This should be done via a mail to debian-devel@ although you can of course blog after that! we – as a team – get rid of it. That it was going to be given up for adoption was clear to me, even though I agree, that my initial wording wasn't clear on this. And I never intended to replace the official announcement (O: mail) to debian-devel. I thought of it more as a wider-audience heads-up, maybe even reaching some upstream developers of (scientific) applications and getting them to switch to Qt4. I am planning to do a blog post about the kdelibs removal once arts is out with some numbers. But it won't be in the next 2 weeks. If you already blog about (all) this, no need for me to do it too. I was just missing some semi-regular KDE/Qt news on p.d.o to give the KDE/Qt stuff some more visibility. But since Lisandro already pointed out, that you do/did these kind of things, I'll defer to you. Let me know, by when you would need the piece about dhmk to be included in your post and I see what I can do. Kind regards, Kai Wasserbäch -- E-Mail: cu...@debian.org IRC: Curan Jabber: dri...@debianforum.de URL: http://wiki.debian.org/C%C3%B9ran GnuPG: 0xE1DE59D2 0600 96CE F3C8 E733 E5B6 1587 A309 D76C E1DE 59D2 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk