[Pkg-lustre-maintainers] Bug#411603: marked as done (liblustre: library is missing the soname)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:33:33 + with message-id e1vnuo1-vs...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#690459: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #411603, regarding liblustre: library is missing the soname to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 411603: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=411603 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: liblustre Version: 1.5.95-1 Severity: important Hi, The shared library liblustre.so is missing a soname, also the soversion is not part of the shared library name, which will break packages linking against it, by not picking the correct dependency and by not avoiding to link at runtime if there's any ABI changes. If the sole purpose of this shared library is to be preloaded into binaries that are not prepared for it, then it does not make sense to have the library under /usr/lib/. regards, guillem ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 1.8.5+dfsg-3.1+rm Dear submitter, as the package lustre has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/690459 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)---End Message--- ___ Pkg-lustre-maintainers mailing list Pkg-lustre-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-lustre-maintainers
[Pkg-lustre-maintainers] Bug#646739: marked as done (lustre: drops readline support if rebuilt)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:33:33 + with message-id e1vnuo1-vs...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#690459: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #646739, regarding lustre: drops readline support if rebuilt to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 646739: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=646739 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: lustre Version: 1.8.5+dfsg-2 Severity: important User: svenj...@gmx.de Usertags: readline-disabled When built in a clean sid chroot without libncurses5-dev installed, lustre loses readline support. From my pbuilder log: , | checking whether to enable readline support... yes | checking for readline in -lreadline... no ` Adding libncurses-dev to Build-Depends should avoid this. However, consider patching the upstream build system which erroneously believes that ncurses is necessary for linking with readline. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-nouveau (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 1.8.5+dfsg-3.1+rm Dear submitter, as the package lustre has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/690459 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)---End Message--- ___ Pkg-lustre-maintainers mailing list Pkg-lustre-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-lustre-maintainers
[Pkg-lustre-maintainers] Bug#711701: marked as done (src:lustre: uses deprecated find -perm +0123)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:33:33 + with message-id e1vnuo1-vs...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#690459: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #711701, regarding src:lustre: uses deprecated find -perm +0123 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 711701: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=711701 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: src:lustre Version: 1.8.5+dfsg-3.1 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi! An incoming version of findutils drops the syntax of find -perm +0123, which contradicts POSIX and thus has been deprecated since 2005. The replacement is -perm /0123. lustre uses it in one place, ./lustre/tests/sanity.sh Please replace ! -perm +4 -printf '-I %f\n') with ! -perm /4 -printf '-I %f\n') -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (150, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.9.4-x32 (SMP w/6 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 1.8.5+dfsg-3.1+rm Dear submitter, as the package lustre has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/690459 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)---End Message--- ___ Pkg-lustre-maintainers mailing list Pkg-lustre-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-lustre-maintainers
[Pkg-lustre-maintainers] Bug#651795: marked as done (Fails to build against Linux 3.1)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:33:33 + with message-id e1vnuo1-vs...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#690459: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #651795, regarding Fails to build against Linux 3.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 651795: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651795 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: lustre-source Version: 1.8.5+dfsg-3 Severity: grave The configure script fails with Linux 3.1: checking for /usr/src/linux-headers-3.1.0-1-amd64/.config... yes checking for /usr/src/linux-headers-3.1.0-1-amd64/include/linux/autoconf.h... no configure: error: Run make config in /usr/src/linux-headers-3.1.0-1-amd64. Since Linux 2.6.33, include/linux/autoconf.h has moved to include/generated/autoconf.h. But there should be no need to look for it at all. Ben. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages lustre-source depends on: ii bzip2 1.0.6-1 ii debhelper 8.9.11 ii dpatch2.0.33 ii libsnmp-dev 5.4.3~dfsg-2.3+b1 ii module-assistant 0.11.4 lustre-source recommends no packages. Versions of packages lustre-source suggests: pn ofa-kernel-source none -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 1.8.5+dfsg-3.1+rm Dear submitter, as the package lustre has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/690459 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)---End Message--- ___ Pkg-lustre-maintainers mailing list Pkg-lustre-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-lustre-maintainers
[Pkg-lustre-maintainers] Bug#707423: marked as done (lustre: FTBFS: liblustre.h:498:9: error: unknown type name 'umode_t')
Your message dated Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:33:33 + with message-id e1vnuo1-vs...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#690459: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #707423, regarding lustre: FTBFS: liblustre.h:498:9: error: unknown type name 'umode_t' to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 707423: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707423 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: lustre Version: 1.8.5+dfsg-3.1 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130509 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../../lustre/lvfs -I../.. -D__arch_lib__ -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE=1 -include /«BUILDDIR»/lustre-1.8.5+dfsg/debian/build/config.h -I/«BUILDDIR»/lustre-1.8.5+dfsg/debian/build/lnet/include -I/«BUILDDIR»/lustre-1.8.5+dfsg/lnet/include -I/«BUILDDIR»/lustre-1.8.5+dfsg/lustre/include -I/«BUILDDIR»/lustre-1.8.5+dfsg/debian/build/lnet/include -I/«BUILDDIR»/lustre-1.8.5+dfsg/debian/build/lustre/include -g -Wall -fPIC -D_GNU_SOURCE -g -O2 -c -o liblvfs_a-lvfs_userfs.o `test -f 'lvfs_userfs.c' || echo '../../../../lustre/lvfs/'`lvfs_userfs.c In file included from ../../../../lustre/lvfs/lvfs_userfs.c:43:0: /«BUILDDIR»/lustre-1.8.5+dfsg/lustre/include/liblustre.h:498:9: error: unknown type name 'umode_t' make[4]: *** [liblvfs_a-lvfs_userfs.o] Error 1 The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2013/05/09/lustre_1.8.5+dfsg-3.1_unstable.log A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 1.8.5+dfsg-3.1+rm Dear submitter, as the package lustre has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/690459 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)---End Message--- ___ Pkg-lustre-maintainers mailing list Pkg-lustre-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-lustre-maintainers
[Pkg-lustre-maintainers] Bug#699252: marked as done (ldiskfsprogs: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: lustre-dev)
Your message dated Fri, 09 Aug 2013 06:51:23 + with message-id e1v7gxj-0008bo...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#693506: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #699252, regarding ldiskfsprogs: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: lustre-dev to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 699252: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699252 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: ldiskfsprogs Version: 1.41.90.wc4+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130129 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: ┌──┐ │ Install ldiskfsprogs build dependencies (apt-based resolver) │ └──┘ Installing build dependencies Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Reading state information... Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: sbuild-build-depends-ldiskfsprogs-dummy : Depends: lustre-dev but it is not installable E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. apt-get failed. The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2013/01/29/ldiskfsprogs_1.41.90.wc4+dfsg-1_wheezy.log A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 1.41.90.wc4+dfsg-1+rm Dear submitter, as the package ldiskfsprogs has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/693506 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Ansgar Burchardt (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)---End Message--- ___ Pkg-lustre-maintainers mailing list Pkg-lustre-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-lustre-maintainers
[Pkg-lustre-maintainers] Processed: Removal request
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 693506 ftp.debian.org Bug #693506 [src:ldiskfsprogs] Build-depends on obsolete package lustre Bug reassigned from package 'src:ldiskfsprogs' to 'ftp.debian.org'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #693506 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #693506 to the same values previously set retitle 693506 RM: ldiskfsprogs -- RoQA; depends on lustre, to be removed Bug #693506 [ftp.debian.org] Build-depends on obsolete package lustre Changed Bug title to 'RM: ldiskfsprogs -- RoQA; depends on lustre, to be removed' from 'Build-depends on obsolete package lustre' severity 693506 normal Bug #693506 [ftp.debian.org] RM: ldiskfsprogs -- RoQA; depends on lustre, to be removed Severity set to 'normal' from 'important' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 693506: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693506 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___ Pkg-lustre-maintainers mailing list Pkg-lustre-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-lustre-maintainers
[Pkg-lustre-maintainers] Processed: cloning 690459, reassign -1 to src:adios, retitle -1 to Build-depends on obsolete package lustre ...
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: clone 690459 -1 -2 Bug #690459 [ftp.debian.org] RM: lustre -- RoQA; does not work with Debian Linux kernel packages Bug 690459 cloned as bugs 693505-693506 reassign -1 src:adios Bug #693505 [ftp.debian.org] RM: lustre -- RoQA; does not work with Debian Linux kernel packages Bug reassigned from package 'ftp.debian.org' to 'src:adios'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #693505 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #693505 to the same values previously set retitle -1 Build-depends on obsolete package lustre Bug #693505 [src:adios] RM: lustre -- RoQA; does not work with Debian Linux kernel packages Changed Bug title to 'Build-depends on obsolete package lustre' from 'RM: lustre -- RoQA; does not work with Debian Linux kernel packages' severity -1 important Bug #693505 [src:adios] Build-depends on obsolete package lustre Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' tags -1 - moreinfo Bug #693505 [src:adios] Build-depends on obsolete package lustre Removed tag(s) moreinfo. reassign -2 src:ldiskfsprogs Bug #693506 [ftp.debian.org] RM: lustre -- RoQA; does not work with Debian Linux kernel packages Bug reassigned from package 'ftp.debian.org' to 'src:ldiskfsprogs'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #693506 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #693506 to the same values previously set retitle -2 Build-depends on obsolete package lustre Bug #693506 [src:ldiskfsprogs] RM: lustre -- RoQA; does not work with Debian Linux kernel packages Changed Bug title to 'Build-depends on obsolete package lustre' from 'RM: lustre -- RoQA; does not work with Debian Linux kernel packages' severity -2 important Bug #693506 [src:ldiskfsprogs] Build-depends on obsolete package lustre Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' tags -2 - moreinfo Bug #693506 [src:ldiskfsprogs] Build-depends on obsolete package lustre Removed tag(s) moreinfo. block 690459 with -1 -2 Bug #690459 [ftp.debian.org] RM: lustre -- RoQA; does not work with Debian Linux kernel packages 690459 was not blocked by any bugs. 690459 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 690459: 693506 and 693505 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 690459: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690459 693505: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693505 693506: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693506 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___ Pkg-lustre-maintainers mailing list Pkg-lustre-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-lustre-maintainers
[Pkg-lustre-maintainers] Processed: linux-3.1 is not supported by upstream
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 651795 wishlist Bug #651795 [lustre-source] Fails to build against Linux 3.1 Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'grave' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 651795: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651795 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___ Pkg-lustre-maintainers mailing list Pkg-lustre-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-lustre-maintainers
[Pkg-lustre-maintainers] Processed: Re: linux-3.1 is not supported by upstream
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 651795 grave Bug #651795 [lustre-source] Fails to build against Linux 3.1 Severity set to 'grave' from 'wishlist' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 651795: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651795 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___ Pkg-lustre-maintainers mailing list Pkg-lustre-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-lustre-maintainers
[Pkg-lustre-maintainers] Bug#615749: marked as done (lustre: ftbfs with gold or ld --no-add-needed)
Your message dated Thu, 17 Mar 2011 12:02:33 + with message-id e1q0but-0007dg...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#615749: fixed in lustre 1.8.5+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #615749, regarding lustre: ftbfs with gold or ld --no-add-needed to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 615749: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=615749 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: lustre Version: 1.8.3-4 Severity: important Tags: sid User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de Usertags: no-add-needed The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with ld --no-add-needed. For details, please see: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2011/02/msg00011.html http://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/DSOLinking Ubuntu might have a patch for this issue, but unfortunately it was not forwarded to Debian. Please have a look at http://packages.qa.debian.org/lustre to see if an Ubuntu version for this package exists, and if a fix is included in the Ubuntu diff. [...] gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../../lustre/tests -I../.. -D__arch_lib__ -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE=1 -I/opt/lam/include -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DLUSTRE_UTILS -include /build/user-lustre_1.8.3-4-amd64-V6kmFC/lustre-1.8.3/debian/build/config.h -I/build/user-lustre_1.8.3-4-amd64-V6kmFC/lustre-1.8.3/debian/build/lnet/include -I/build/user-lustre_1.8.3-4-amd64-V6kmFC/lustre-1.8.3/lnet/include -I/build/user-lustre_1.8.3-4-amd64-V6kmFC/lustre-1.8.3/lustre/include -I/build/user-lustre_1.8.3-4-amd64-V6kmFC/lustre-1.8.3/debian/build/lnet/include -I/build/user-lustre_1.8.3-4-amd64-V6kmFC/lustre-1.8.3/debian/build/lustre/include -g -Wall -fPIC -D_GNU_SOURCE -Wall -g -O2 -c `test -f '../../../../lustre/tests/checkstat.c' || echo '../../../../lustre/tests/'`../../../../lustre/tests/checkstat.c gcc -g -Wall -fPIC -D_GNU_SOURCE -Wall -g -O2 -o checkstat checkstat.o gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../../lustre/tests -I../.. -D__arch_lib__ -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE=1 -I/opt/lam/include -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DLUSTRE_UTILS -include /build/user-lustre_1.8.3-4-amd64-V6kmFC/lustre-1.8.3/debian/build/config.h -I/build/user-lustre_1.8.3-4-amd64-V6kmFC/lustre-1.8.3/debian/build/lnet/include -I/build/user-lustre_1.8.3-4-amd64-V6kmFC/lustre-1.8.3/lnet/include -I/build/user-lustre_1.8.3-4-amd64-V6kmFC/lustre-1.8.3/lustre/include -I/build/user-lustre_1.8.3-4-amd64-V6kmFC/lustre-1.8.3/debian/build/lnet/include -I/build/user-lustre_1.8.3-4-amd64-V6kmFC/lustre-1.8.3/debian/build/lustre/include -g -Wall -fPIC -D_GNU_SOURCE -Wall -g -O2 -c `test -f '../../../../lustre/tests/statone.c' || echo '../../../../lustre/tests/'`../../../../lustre/tests/statone.c gcc -g -Wall -fPIC -D_GNU_SOURCE -Wall -g -O2 -o statone statone.o gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../../lustre/tests -I../.. -D__arch_lib__ -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE=1 -I/opt/lam/include -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DLUSTRE_UTILS -include /build/user-lustre_1.8.3-4-amd64-V6kmFC/lustre-1.8.3/debian/build/config.h -I/build/user-lustre_1.8.3-4-amd64-V6kmFC/lustre-1.8.3/debian/build/lnet/include -I/build/user-lustre_1.8.3-4-amd64-V6kmFC/lustre-1.8.3/lnet/include -I/build/user-lustre_1.8.3-4-amd64-V6kmFC/lustre-1.8.3/lustre/include -I/build/user-lustre_1.8.3-4-amd64-V6kmFC/lustre-1.8.3/debian/build/lnet/include -I/build/user-lustre_1.8.3-4-amd64-V6kmFC/lustre-1.8.3/debian/build/lustre/include -g -Wall -fPIC -D_GNU_SOURCE -Wall -g -O2 -c `test -f '../../../../lustre/tests/runas.c' || echo '../../../../lustre/tests/'`../../../../lustre/tests/runas.c gcc -g -Wall -fPIC -D_GNU_SOURCE -Wall -g -O2 -o runas runas.o gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../../lustre/tests -I../.. -D__arch_lib__ -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE=1 -I/opt/lam/include -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DLUSTRE_UTILS -include /build/user-lustre_1.8.3-4-amd64-V6kmFC/lustre-1.8.3/debian/build/config.h -I/build/user-lustre_1.8.3-4-amd64-V6kmFC/lustre-1.8.3/debian/build/lnet/include -I/build/user-lustre_1.8.3-4-amd64-V6kmFC/lustre-1.8.3/lnet/include -I/build/user-lustre_1.8.3-4-amd64-V6kmFC/lustre-1.8.3/lustre/include -I/build/user-lustre_1.8.3-4-amd64-V6kmFC/lustre-1.8.3/debian/build/lnet/include -I/build/user-lustre_1.8.3-4-amd64-V6kmFC/lustre-1.8.3/debian/build/lustre/include -g -Wall -fPIC -D_GNU_SOURCE -Wall -g -O2 -c `test -f '../../../../lustre/tests/openfile.c' || echo '../../../../lustre/tests/'`../../../../lustre/tests/openfile.c gcc -g -Wall -fPIC -D_GNU_SOURCE -Wall -g -O2 -o
[Pkg-lustre-maintainers] Bug#586561: marked as done (ldiskfsck: Typo in package description)
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 10:32:30 + with message-id e1othx8-0007jd...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#586561: fixed in ldiskfsprogs 1.41.10-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #586561, regarding ldiskfsck: Typo in package description to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 586561: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=586561 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: ldiskfsck Severity: minor In DDTSS I see: it will consume much more space thant it's dynamic linked counterpart ^ | but it must be: it will consume much more space than it's dynamic linked counterpart Ciao Davide -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- Dizionari: http://linguistico.sourceforge.net/wiki Petizione per l'uso di formati accessibili nell'Unione Europea http://tinyurl.com/y6u4m5 Non autorizzo la memorizzazione del mio indirizzo su outlook ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: ldiskfsprogs Source-Version: 1.41.10-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ldiskfsprogs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: ldiskfsck_1.41.10-2_amd64.deb to main/l/ldiskfsprogs/ldiskfsck_1.41.10-2_amd64.deb ldiskfsprogs_1.41.10-2.diff.gz to main/l/ldiskfsprogs/ldiskfsprogs_1.41.10-2.diff.gz ldiskfsprogs_1.41.10-2.dsc to main/l/ldiskfsprogs/ldiskfsprogs_1.41.10-2.dsc lfsck_1.41.10-2_amd64.deb to main/l/ldiskfsprogs/lfsck_1.41.10-2_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 586...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Patrick Winnertz win...@debian.org (supplier of updated ldiskfsprogs package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 10:51:20 +0200 Source: ldiskfsprogs Binary: ldiskfsck lfsck Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.41.10-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Lustre Packaging Team pkg-lustre-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: Patrick Winnertz win...@debian.org Description: ldiskfsck - statically-linked lustre version of the ext2 filesystem checker lfsck - statically linked version of the lustre filesystem checker Closes: 548483 586561 Changes: ldiskfsprogs (1.41.10-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Build-depend on libdb-dev (= 4.7) instead of libdb4.6-dev (Closes: #548483) * Fix typo in package description (Closes: #586561) Checksums-Sha1: d1e25b315a6648bd549179dd86c38667f3e86030 1340 ldiskfsprogs_1.41.10-2.dsc d48f786ba2b716e2ce8979a3e15aa6a12c4c50bf 583091 ldiskfsprogs_1.41.10-2.diff.gz 8ba36a9c04eba3e174993665fd04a292869c051e 1200640 ldiskfsck_1.41.10-2_amd64.deb bcfd108719dce17fe4faf416bd3a53e493786cc0 994002 lfsck_1.41.10-2_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: ae5ef056ebbc3fa39aeaa3391b4ae2b9ddb86b669cf6769dddca7cf3edc05d75 1340 ldiskfsprogs_1.41.10-2.dsc bf56c88d9f30408d5663528ccd3414241ddc6edb9860fd4dca635cf51d2d5967 583091 ldiskfsprogs_1.41.10-2.diff.gz 6b3dc63e38cac55c93b3ba796a57d96b325bc42456643ce3dc325f5f05958f59 1200640 ldiskfsck_1.41.10-2_amd64.deb c59eb770a26039c76c531dd6917fcbae5a305a3a74c0041bce99f8332bb27c0a 994002 lfsck_1.41.10-2_amd64.deb Files: 677324ff0867b6bb96043facff96bf53 1340 admin optional ldiskfsprogs_1.41.10-2.dsc d01fa8dc2ca4fd6628f5a2751b459b64 583091 admin optional ldiskfsprogs_1.41.10-2.diff.gz 20e1575ef9c3c0cb67aea89a7338c5cc 1200640 admin optional ldiskfsck_1.41.10-2_amd64.deb 8509214bc21283b2777c93f5a5e88b34 994002 admin optional lfsck_1.41.10-2_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkyHY3MACgkQzgm26bkTFDpz1wCgje9V86qGP1FKMAUlzmjEtSk2 y8sAn3p2wuvJZJNYNUjSDA68fGB0Qhv3 =7DUe -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message--- ___ Pkg-lustre-maintainers mailing list Pkg-lustre-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http
[Pkg-lustre-maintainers] Processed: severity of 511722 is important
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Never build succesful on powerpc severity 511722 important Bug#511722: ldiskfsprogs_1.40.11-2(powerpc/unstable): FTBFS: undefined references Severity set to `important' from `serious' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ___ Pkg-lustre-maintainers mailing list Pkg-lustre-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-lustre-maintainers
[Pkg-lustre-maintainers] Processed: pending..
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 515860 + pending Bug#515860: ldiskfsprogs There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ___ Pkg-lustre-maintainers mailing list Pkg-lustre-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-lustre-maintainers
[Pkg-lustre-maintainers] Processed: reassign 501427 to linux-source-2.6.26
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 reassign 501427 linux-source-2.6.26 Bug#501427: lustre build script resets version string in kernel headers Bug reassigned from package `lustre-source' to `linux-source-2.6.26'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ___ Pkg-lustre-maintainers mailing list Pkg-lustre-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-lustre-maintainers
[Pkg-lustre-maintainers] Processed: Re: Bug#501427: m-a changes the utsstring in include/linux/utsrelease.h if kernel is build with --append-to-version
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 501427 lustre-source Bug#501427: m-a changes the utsstring in include/linux/utsrelease.h if kernel is build with --append-to-version Bug reassigned from package `module-assistant' to `lustre-source'. retitle 501427 lustre build script resets version string in kernel headers Bug#501427: m-a changes the utsstring in include/linux/utsrelease.h if kernel is build with --append-to-version Changed Bug title to `lustre build script resets version string in kernel headers' from `m-a changes the utsstring in include/linux/utsrelease.h if kernel is build with --append-to-version'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ___ Pkg-lustre-maintainers mailing list Pkg-lustre-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-lustre-maintainers
