[Pkg-lustre-maintainers] lustre_1.6.7-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: liblustre_1.6.7-1_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lustre/liblustre_1.6.7-1_i386.deb linux-patch-lustre_1.6.7-1_all.deb to pool/main/l/lustre/linux-patch-lustre_1.6.7-1_all.deb lustre-dev_1.6.7-1_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lustre/lustre-dev_1.6.7-1_i386.deb lustre-source_1.6.7-1_all.deb to pool/main/l/lustre/lustre-source_1.6.7-1_all.deb lustre-tests_1.6.7-1_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lustre/lustre-tests_1.6.7-1_i386.deb lustre-utils_1.6.7-1_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lustre/lustre-utils_1.6.7-1_i386.deb lustre_1.6.7-1.diff.gz to pool/main/l/lustre/lustre_1.6.7-1.diff.gz lustre_1.6.7-1.dsc to pool/main/l/lustre/lustre_1.6.7-1.dsc lustre_1.6.7.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/l/lustre/lustre_1.6.7.orig.tar.gz Override entries for your package: liblustre_1.6.7-1_i386.deb - optional otherosfs linux-patch-lustre_1.6.7-1_all.deb - optional kernel lustre-dev_1.6.7-1_i386.deb - optional libdevel lustre-source_1.6.7-1_all.deb - optional kernel lustre-tests_1.6.7-1_i386.deb - optional admin lustre-utils_1.6.7-1_i386.deb - optional utils lustre_1.6.7-1.dsc - source admin Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ Pkg-lustre-maintainers mailing list Pkg-lustre-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-lustre-maintainers
[Pkg-lustre-maintainers] lustre override disparity
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): linux-patch-lustre_1.6.7-1_all.deb: package says section is devel, override says kernel. lustre-source_1.6.7-1_all.deb: package says section is admin, override says kernel. Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the archive: cli-mono, database, debug, fonts, gnu-r, gnustep, haskell, httpd, java, kernel, lisp, localization, ocaml, php, ruby, vcs, video, xfce, zope. At this time a script was used to reclassify packages into these sections. If this is the case, please only reply to this email if the new section is inappropriate, otherwise please update your package at the next upload. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why. Please INCLUDE the list of packages as seen above, or we won't be able to deal with your mail due to missing information. [NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you replied to one like it before and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail. Your reply needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.] -- Debian distribution maintenance software (This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) ___ Pkg-lustre-maintainers mailing list Pkg-lustre-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-lustre-maintainers
[Pkg-lustre-maintainers] Processed: severity of 511722 is important
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Never build succesful on powerpc severity 511722 important Bug#511722: ldiskfsprogs_1.40.11-2(powerpc/unstable): FTBFS: undefined references Severity set to `important' from `serious' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ___ Pkg-lustre-maintainers mailing list Pkg-lustre-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-lustre-maintainers
