[Pkg-mozext-maintainers] Processed: Re: Bug#844003: ublock-origin: please provide backport to stable

2016-11-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> owner -1 !
Bug #844003 [ublock-origin] ublock-origin: please provide backport to stable
Owner recorded as Sean Whitton .

-- 
844003: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=844003
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
Pkg-mozext-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-mozext-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-mozext-maintainers


[Pkg-mozext-maintainers] Bug#844003: Bug#844003: ublock-origin: please provide backport to stable

2016-11-11 Thread Sean Whitton
control: owner -1 !

Dear Martin,

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 06:43:40PM +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> After adblock-plus getting a bad reputation for its
> "acceptable ads" policy, ublock-origin is often recommended
> as alternative. It would be nice to have it in stable, too.
> 
> The backport itself is trivial, IIRC.
> I can take care of it, if nobody else volunteers.

I should be able to do this tomorrow.  Thanks for the suggestion.

-- 
Sean Whitton


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Pkg-mozext-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-mozext-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-mozext-maintainers

[Pkg-mozext-maintainers] Bug#844003: ublock-origin: please provide backport to stable

2016-11-11 Thread W. Martin Borgert

Package: ublock-origin
Version: 1.9.16+dfsg-1
Severity: wishlist

After adblock-plus getting a bad reputation for its
"acceptable ads" policy, ublock-origin is often recommended
as alternative. It would be nice to have it in stable, too.

The backport itself is trivial, IIRC.
I can take care of it, if nobody else volunteers.

___
Pkg-mozext-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-mozext-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-mozext-maintainers


[Pkg-mozext-maintainers] nosquint REMOVED from testing

2016-11-11 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the nosquint source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 2.1.9-4
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: 
Bug #840569: nosquint should not be in stretch

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

___
Pkg-mozext-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-mozext-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-mozext-maintainers