[Pkg-mozext-maintainers] Bug#803947: enigmail: completely broken after upgrade of gnupg2 to 2.1.9

2016-03-20 Thread Mehdi Dogguy 
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 06:58:34PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy  wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 10:38:39AM +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig 
>  wrote:
> > Control: severity -1 important
> > thanks.
> > 
> > i'm unable to reproduce the problem on my xfce4 machine.
> > 
> > therefore the severity of this bug-report can at most be "important"
> > ("a bug which has a major effect on the usability of a package, without
> > rendering it completely unusable to everyone").
> > 
> > "grave" is a bit over the top ("makes the package in question unusable
> > or mostly so, or causes data loss, or introduces a security hole
> > allowing access to the accounts of users who use the package").
> > 
> 
> I am also experiencing the same bug. I cannot sign or encrypt messages
> using Enigmail (enigmail and icedove from Stretch). Decrypting messages
> doesn't work too.
>

FWIW, my issue was related to https://bugs.gnupg.org/gnupg/issue1983

So nothing to do with Enigmail, except for the pretty useless error message.

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy

___
Pkg-mozext-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-mozext-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-mozext-maintainers

[Pkg-mozext-maintainers] Bug#803947: enigmail: completely broken after upgrade of gnupg2 to 2.1.9

2016-03-20 Thread Mehdi Dogguy 
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 10:38:39AM +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig 
 wrote:
> Control: severity -1 important
> thanks.
> 
> i'm unable to reproduce the problem on my xfce4 machine.
> 
> therefore the severity of this bug-report can at most be "important"
> ("a bug which has a major effect on the usability of a package, without
> rendering it completely unusable to everyone").
> 
> "grave" is a bit over the top ("makes the package in question unusable
> or mostly so, or causes data loss, or introduces a security hole
> allowing access to the accounts of users who use the package").
> 

I am also experiencing the same bug. I cannot sign or encrypt messages
using Enigmail (enigmail and icedove from Stretch). Decrypting messages
doesn't work too.

Enigmail is still able to check validity of a signature though.

I agree that it still does something, but I would not call the package
usable. Its main purpose is really not to check signatures, but to
help signing/encrypting messages. So the severity should reflect that.

Regards,

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy

___
Pkg-mozext-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-mozext-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-mozext-maintainers

[Pkg-mozext-maintainers] Bug#803947: enigmail: completely broken after upgrade of gnupg2 to 2.1.9

2015-11-12 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig 
Control: severity -1 important
thanks.

i'm unable to reproduce the problem on my xfce4 machine.

therefore the severity of this bug-report can at most be "important"
("a bug which has a major effect on the usability of a package, without
rendering it completely unusable to everyone").

"grave" is a bit over the top ("makes the package in question unusable
or mostly so, or causes data loss, or introduces a security hole
allowing access to the accounts of users who use the package").


mgfsrd
IOhannes



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-mozext-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-mozext-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-mozext-maintainers

[Pkg-mozext-maintainers] Bug#803947: enigmail: completely broken after upgrade of gnupg2 to 2.1.9

2015-11-03 Thread Philipp Huebner 
This issue seems to be similar to the current RC bugs in gnupg2:
#795639 and #796931

Regards,
-- 
 .''`.   Philipp Huebner 
: :'  :  pgp fp: 6719 25C5 B8CD E74A 5225  3DF9 E5CA 8C49 25E4 205F
`. `'`
  `-



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-mozext-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-mozext-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-mozext-maintainers