Bug#909848: lame: symbol lookup error: lame: undefined symbol: lame_get_maximum_number_of_samples
On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 09:14:53PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > The dependencies are correct. > > What you say is only true for packages that are (or were) in Debian. Oops, sorry, the package was from debian multimedia and I didn't realize (I thought I installed the testing package). Sorry for the bogus report then :/ -- The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG -==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net ==-- _ generation ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / schm...@schmorp.de -=/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#909848: lame: symbol lookup error: lame: undefined symbol: lame_get_maximum_number_of_samples
On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 09:14:53PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 08:02:18PM +0200, Marc Lehmann wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 05:21:14PM +0300, Adrian Bunk > > wrote: > > > > Versions of packages lame depends on: > > > >... > > > > ii libmp3lame0 1:3.99.5-dmo6 > > Maybe I am confused, but shouldn't debian packages declare proper > > dependencies? The above command only fixes this on my system (where it is > > already fixed), not in the actual package which didn't have the proper > > dependency (assuming I didn't hit an apt-get bug). > > The dependencies are correct. > > What you say is only true for packages that are (or were) in Debian. > > Debian has no control over packages and their versions in 3rd party > repositories hosted elsewhere, and problems that are caused by by > installing such 3rd party packages are out of scope of what is supported > by Debian. Especially when that repository is deb-multimedia.org which has a long history of breaking dependency resolutions with the stock debian packages. I recommend you just stop using that repository if you don't have any *real* use for it, and if you do then you should probably become more proficient at handling these kind of issues yourself. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#909848: lame: symbol lookup error: lame: undefined symbol: lame_get_maximum_number_of_samples
On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 05:21:14PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Versions of packages lame depends on: > >... > > ii libmp3lame0 1:3.99.5-dmo6 > >... > > Fix: > apt-get install libmp3lame0=3.100-2+b1 Maybe I am confused, but shouldn't debian packages declare proper dependencies? The above command only fixes this on my system (where it is already fixed), not in the actual package which didn't have the proper dependency (assuming I didn't hit an apt-get bug). Greetings, -- The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG -==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net ==-- _ generation ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / schm...@schmorp.de -=/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#909848: lame: symbol lookup error: lame: undefined symbol: lame_get_maximum_number_of_samples
On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 08:02:18PM +0200, Marc Lehmann wrote: > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 05:21:14PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Versions of packages lame depends on: > > >... > > > ii libmp3lame0 1:3.99.5-dmo6 > > >... > > > > Fix: > > apt-get install libmp3lame0=3.100-2+b1 > > Maybe I am confused, but shouldn't debian packages declare proper > dependencies? The above command only fixes this on my system (where it is > already fixed), not in the actual package which didn't have the proper > dependency (assuming I didn't hit an apt-get bug). The dependencies are correct. What you say is only true for packages that are (or were) in Debian. Debian has no control over packages and their versions in 3rd party repositories hosted elsewhere, and problems that are caused by by installing such 3rd party packages are out of scope of what is supported by Debian. > Greetings, cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
