Bug#676713: audacity: DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noopt still compiles some files with -O2
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 03:29:03AM +0300, Sami Liedes wrote: > Package: audacity > Version: 2.0.0-1 > Severity: normal > > While trying to build a debuggable package with > > DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="noopt nostrip", > > I ran into this. > > Even with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noopt, most of the modules in the project > are built with -O2, while some are correctly built with -O0 (as the > last -O option takes precedence). Most notably, the core Audacity core > is built with -O2. These modules seem to be compiled with -O2: > > * all modules inside src/ > > AND > > * the modules inside lib-src/portmixer/ Turns out the culprit is libportsmf-dev, which installs a pkg-config file /usr/lib/pkgconfig/portSMF.pc which includes some compiler flags in its Cflags that no pkg-config file normally has business of including, hence causing packages using it to be always compiled with -g -O2 -Wall: $ grep Cflags /usr/lib/pkgconfig/portSMF.pc Cflags: -I${includedir}/portSMF -g -O2 -Wall Sami signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#676713: audacity: DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noopt still compiles some files with -O2
Package: audacity Version: 2.0.0-1 Severity: normal While trying to build a debuggable package with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="noopt nostrip", I ran into this. Even with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noopt, most of the modules in the project are built with -O2, while some are correctly built with -O0 (as the last -O option takes precedence). Most notably, the core Audacity core is built with -O2. These modules seem to be compiled with -O2: * all modules inside src/ AND * the modules inside lib-src/portmixer/ An example gcc invokation from the build log (attached): g++ -c -I../lib-src/portmixer/include -g -O0 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wall -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-release-2.8 -I/usr/include/wx-2.8 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGE_FILES -D__WXGTK__ -pthread -I../lib-src/FileDialog -I/home/sliedes/scratch/rec/audacity-2.0.0/lib-src/lib-widget-extra -I../lib-src/sbsms/include -I/usr/include/soundtouch -I../lib-src/libnyquist -g -O2 -Wall -I/usr/include/portSMF -pthread -fno-strict-aliasing -I./include -I. -DLIBDIR=\"/usr/lib\" -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wall -pthread -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/gio-unix-2.0/ -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 BlockFile.cpp -o BlockFile.o Sami -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.4.0 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages audacity depends on: ii audacity-data 2.0.0-1 ii libasound21.0.25-3 ii libavcodec53 6:0.8.2-2 ii libavformat53 [libavformat-extra-53] 6:0.8.2-2 ii libavutil51 [libavutil-extra-51] 6:0.8.2-2 ii libc6 2.13-33 ii libexpat1 2.1.0-1 ii libflac++61.2.1-6 ii libflac8 1.2.1-6 ii libgcc1 1:4.7.0-12 ii libglib2.0-0 2.32.3-1 ii libgtk2.0-0 2.24.10-1 ii libid3tag00.15.1b-10 ii libmad0 0.15.1b-7 ii libmp3lame0 3.99.5+repack1-3 ii libogg0 1.3.0-4 ii libportaudio2 19+svn2021-1 ii libportsmf0 0.1~svn20101010-3 ii libsamplerate00.1.8-4 ii libsndfile1 1.0.25-4 ii libsoundtouch01.6.0-3 ii libstdc++64.7.0-12 ii libtwolame0 0.3.13-1 ii libvamp-hostsdk3 2.1-1 ii libvorbis0a 1.3.2-1.3 ii libvorbisenc2 1.3.2-1.3 ii libvorbisfile31.3.2-1.3 ii libwxbase2.8-02.8.12.1-11 ii libwxgtk2.8-0 2.8.12.1-11 audacity recommends no packages. Versions of packages audacity suggests: pn ladspa-plugin -- no debconf information build.log.bz2 Description: Binary data signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
tetraproc 0.8.2-2 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the tetraproc source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.8.2-1 Current version: 0.8.2-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
yafaray 0.1.2+really0.1.2~beta5-1 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the yafaray source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.1.2-2 Current version: 0.1.2+really0.1.2~beta5-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
clam-networkeditor 1.4.0-3.1 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the clam-networkeditor source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.4.0-3 Current version: 1.4.0-3.1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
clxclient 3.6.1-6 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the clxclient source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 3.6.1-4 Current version: 3.6.1-6 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
clam 1.4.0-5.1 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the clam source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.4.0-5 Current version: 1.4.0-5.1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
lv2-extensions-good REMOVED from testing
FYI: The status of the lv2-extensions-good source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0~20111202+dfsg0-1 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: Package not in unstable The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals. -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Help getting started -- trying to build csound package
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 11:52 PM, Forrest Cahoon wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Forrest Cahoon > wrote: > > > It looks like I get to fix up the patch so it applies now. Any advice > > on how to do this? > > On closer inspection, I have found that the diff for > interfaces/CMakeLists.txt in > debian/patches/-backported-cmake-additions.diff has been applied > upstream. I could manually remove that diff from the file, I'm under > the impression I need to use quilt to manage these diffs so they'll > continue to play nicely with the build? I'm poring over the quilt > docs, but have yet to attain enlightenment. In csound, we follow the following naming pattern: 0xxx for patches taken from upstream git 1xxx for patches that should be forwarded upstream 2xxx for debian-specific patches So, most likely all 0xxx patches have to go away, and 1xxx need to be reviewed. In any case, all remaining patches have to be refreshed so that they apply without fuzz. As noted, we use quilt. Use[1] quilt pop and quilt push to apply/unapply patches, and the file debian/patches/series contains the order in which they are to be applied. [1] After following the advice Giulio mentioned. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: RFC: Getting HandBrake working in Debian
Am 08.06.2012 11:55, schrieb Rogério Brito: One point that we need to have addressed is the libdvd{read,nav} thing, as those are the only 2 packages that we download at build time. Can't we use at least libdvdread from Debian or does it also use one of the symbols added to libdvdnav? I [sent a bug report regarding libdvdnav][0] to Daniel Baumann, but I'm not sure if my e-mails are getting through. I'm including he in the carbon copy here. [0]: http://bugs.debian.org/675531 I've seen this. Actually, I think only the following commit is required for handbrake to compile against Debian's package: https://github.com/microe/libdvdnav/commit/4ad6ed45b32f988f5b7c3c19b069acb96583fcd9 - Fabian ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#676541: roaraudio dependency removed from ices2
> The think about releases: rillian offered me to release at any time I > think it is a good idea. In fact I could do myself just don't know the > correct protocol to do this. What you of course neglect to mention is that, for all the other wonderful things that he actually is, rillian is *not* the upstream author of ices2, nor even one of its credited contributors. rillian offered to facilitate a new release - after Jonas asked me to ask upstream if they could do that - in his capacity as a xiph admin. And that was before the actual upstream author said: there's been nothing new to release since like 2005, except the roar patches, which he was not at all keen to add to a formal release. Which if you know MikeS, it should be obvious that he also went to extraordinary lengths to be polite to you about what he really thought of including the roar patches in his code. You aren't being 'persecuted'. The simple fact is roar doesn't actually have any users. Forcing it on to the systems of people who have never heard of it and will never use it would ordinarily be bad enough. Giving them DECnet to go with that though, is a very special brand of black humour. And it's just not funny anymore. Ron ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#676541: marked as done (ices2: Please re-enable RoarAudio support (im_roar))
Your message dated Fri, 8 Jun 2012 12:15:47 +0200 with message-id <20120608101547.gg13...@jones.dk> and subject line Re: Bug#676541: closed by Ron (roaraudio dependency removed from ices2) has caused the Debian Bug report #676541, regarding ices2: Please re-enable RoarAudio support (im_roar) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 676541: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676541 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: ices2 Version: 2.0.1-12 Severity: wishlist flum, The ices2 package used to ship RoarAudio support. This was removed in 2.0.1-12. ChangeLog tells us: * Stop build-depending on libroar-dev or suggesting roaraudio-server. Requested by Ron Lee. It seems there was no public discusion on this nor does the ChangeLog tell why this was done. I request re-enabling RoarAudio support. As far as I know there was no problem with it. This ticket should be closed before the freeze (independed on result) to ensure smallest possible effect to users. Thank you for your help and work. -- Philipp. (Rah of PH2) --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 12-06-08 at 02:43am, Philipp Schafft wrote: > # reopening as not solved in any way I agree with Ron. This bug is now closed: It was a kind request to reenable Roar support, and the request is hereby kindly turned down. Please note that as package maintainer I have the final say in this: Do *not* reopen this bugreport again. You are however welcome to continue the discussion here (closed != closed for discussion). > On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 23:09 +, [Ron] wrote: > > > I'm a little surprised that you claim there was no prior > > > discussion or that you don't know why this was done, since the > > > need for this was discussed with you in person, > > Oh, I was asked by the maintainer (Jonas Smedegaard who did *all* > uploads) to open this ticket exactly because it was not discussed > publicly and not with me or anyone else. No, you were asked to open this bugreport for _this_ discussion to be public (independent of prior discussions). > > > as the only logical conclusion to you digging your heels in and > > > insisting that obsolete things were Absolutely Essential to the > > > functionality of roar, and that you and the-me would rather see > > > roar removed before dropping things like the abandoned celt codec, > > > or DECnet ... > > This seems to be your personal vendetta against me and other persons. Then ignore such remarks: Focus on the technical points. :-) Yes, there _was_ technical points in that mail from Ron! > Please also stop closing random bugs because you don't like them. > Thanks. Not random: Ron commented because I asked him to do so, and closed after asking me first. > PS: Your MUA only sets 'Ron' as real name, this makes it harder for > people to use the search in their MUA. Please consider changing this. Names are pretty irrelevant for focusing on the technical points. Kind regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature --- End Message --- ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: RFC: Getting HandBrake working in Debian
Hi there. On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Am 06.06.2012 14:03, schrieb Rogério Brito: >> BTW, can any of you (preferrably, many of you) test what I have put so far >> in our repositories? It would be nice to get some feedback on many things >> there. > > > Thank you very much for your impressive effort on this!!! That you for the encouraging words. :) > I just tried to build the current package, but failed. It doesn't compile > with git-buildpackage, because it has changes to master relative to the > upstream branch outside of debian/, please check "git diff > master..upstream". Such a mixture of direct changes and clean patches in > debian/patches is generally disapproved. Yes, I know. Do you have any suggestion for solving that? IIRC, the files that I deleted there are files are modified at build time by autotools and my autotools-fu is next to zero. The removal of files was not a problem with format 1.0 packages, but it is for format 3.0 packages. Should I be moving the files that will be overwritten aside and, in the cleaning stage, move them back? For the moment, I'm just installing the build dependencies and, to build things, I'm issuing a simple: fakeroot debian/rules binary and things get magically built. :) I'm using ccache (which will be disabled latter) because, as may just have guessed, I'm building and rebuilding things over and over again. > Also, why do you want to get rid of webkit support? At first, I had a mix of two feelings: * I didn't want my transcoder to phone home. * I wanted to lower the build and runtime dependencies. I'm not really sure if I will keep webkit disabled or not, at the moment (perhaps I will enable it back). Opinions? Frankly, all the times when I tried to update any preset from handbrake's UI I got nothing updated. :) BTW, we are now down to only 2 files that depend on mp4v2 and, if those are somehow dropped, then we will be allowed to redistribute binary packages of handbrake, which means inclusion in our archives. One point that we need to have addressed is the libdvd{read,nav} thing, as those are the only 2 packages that we download at build time. I [sent a bug report regarding libdvdnav][0] to Daniel Baumann, but I'm not sure if my e-mails are getting through. I'm including he in the carbon copy here. [0]: http://bugs.debian.org/675531 Fabian, please let me know of any fixes that you have for HandBrake and, please, report compilation problems or missing dependencies that I may have missed. Thanks, -- Rogério Brito : rbrito@{ime.usp.br,gmail.com} : GPG key 4096R/BCFC http://rb.doesntexist.org/blog : Projects : https://github.com/rbrito/ DebianQA: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=rbrito%40ime.usp.br ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
ffdiaporama_1.3-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: ffdiaporama-data_1.3-1_all.deb to main/f/ffdiaporama/ffdiaporama-data_1.3-1_all.deb ffdiaporama_1.3-1.debian.tar.gz to main/f/ffdiaporama/ffdiaporama_1.3-1.debian.tar.gz ffdiaporama_1.3-1.dsc to main/f/ffdiaporama/ffdiaporama_1.3-1.dsc ffdiaporama_1.3-1_amd64.deb to main/f/ffdiaporama/ffdiaporama_1.3-1_amd64.deb ffdiaporama_1.3.orig.tar.gz to main/f/ffdiaporama/ffdiaporama_1.3.orig.tar.gz Changes: ffdiaporama (1.3-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream version * fix_ftbs_gcc4.7.patch: dropped as it has been adopted upstream * fix-ftbfs-libav-0.7.patch: fix FTBFS with libav 0.7 because of missing headers that has been added in libav 0.8 Override entries for your package: ffdiaporama-data_1.3-1_all.deb - extra graphics ffdiaporama_1.3-1.dsc - source graphics ffdiaporama_1.3-1_amd64.deb - extra graphics Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
devede_3.22.0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: devede_3.22.0-1.debian.tar.gz to main/d/devede/devede_3.22.0-1.debian.tar.gz devede_3.22.0-1.dsc to main/d/devede/devede_3.22.0-1.dsc devede_3.22.0-1_all.deb to main/d/devede/devede_3.22.0-1_all.deb devede_3.22.0.orig.tar.bz2 to main/d/devede/devede_3.22.0.orig.tar.bz2 Changes: devede (3.22.0-1) unstable; urgency=low . [ Fabian Greffrath ] * No need to chmod in /usr/share, dh_fixperms takes care of that. * Simplify override_dh_clean and override_dh_install. * Remove build/ directory in clean rule. * devedesans.ttf is FreeSans, so use the one packaged in Debian instead. * Back to the manual removal of menu.html~. . [ Alessio Treglia ] * New upstream release. * Remove 02-setup_py.patch, applied upstream. * Remove 03-try_setlocale.patch, applied upstream. * debian/rules: - Do not rename devede.py to devede, it is no longer needed. - Do not run install.sh on install, the setup.py scripts properly handles translations. - Remove locale/ dir on clean. * Depends on python-dbus. Override entries for your package: devede_3.22.0-1.dsc - source video devede_3.22.0-1_all.deb - optional video Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processing of devede_3.22.0-1_amd64.changes
devede_3.22.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: devede_3.22.0-1.dsc devede_3.22.0.orig.tar.bz2 devede_3.22.0-1.debian.tar.gz devede_3.22.0-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#672788: marked as done (devede: Failed to load modules DEVEDE_CONVERT. Exiting)
Your message dated Fri, 8 Jun 2012 10:43:21 +0200 with message-id <20120608084321.GA16109@alessio-laptop> and subject line Closing #672788 has caused the Debian Bug report #672788, regarding devede: Failed to load modules DEVEDE_CONVERT. Exiting to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 672788: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=672788 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: devede Version: 3.21.0-1 Severity: normal Dear Mainupdebtainer, It won't start at all with suicide note in the subject. I see, this is the first bug report. Amazing beginning! Do You ever ran it before upload? -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages devede depends on: ii dvdauthor 0.7.0-1.1+b2 ii ffmpeg6:0.8.2-1 ii genisoimage 9:1.1.11-2 ii imagemagick 8:6.7.4.0-5 ii libav-tools [ffmpeg] 6:0.8.2-1 ii libavcodec-extra-53 6:0.8.2-1 ii libavformat53 [libavformat-extra-53] 6:0.8.2-1 ii libavutil51 [libavutil-extra-51] 6:0.8.2-1 ii libpostproc52 [libpostproc-extra-52] 6:0.8.2-1 ii libswscale2 [libswscale-extra-2] 6:0.8.2-1 ii libvorbis0a 1.3.2-1.3 ii libvorbisfile31.3.2-1.3 ii mencoder 2:1.0~rc4.dfsg1+svn34540-1+b1 ii mplayer 2:1.0~rc4.dfsg1+svn34540-1+b1 ii python2.7.2-10 ii python-cairo 1.8.8-1+b2 ii python-gobject3.2.1-1 ii python-gtk2 2.24.0-3 ii vcdimager 0.7.24-1 Versions of packages devede recommends: ii libmp3lame0 3.99.5+repack1-3 devede suggests no packages. -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 3.22.0-1 Not reproducible with devede 3.22.0-1, closing. Regards, -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A --- End Message --- ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#672788: Closing #672788
Version: 3.22.0-1 Not reproducible with devede 3.22.0-1, closing. Regards, -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processing of ffdiaporama_1.3-1_amd64.changes
ffdiaporama_1.3-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ffdiaporama_1.3-1.dsc ffdiaporama_1.3.orig.tar.gz ffdiaporama_1.3-1.debian.tar.gz ffdiaporama_1.3-1_amd64.deb ffdiaporama-data_1.3-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: RFC: Getting HandBrake working in Debian
Am 06.06.2012 14:03, schrieb Rogério Brito: BTW, can any of you (preferrably, many of you) test what I have put so far in our repositories? It would be nice to get some feedback on many things there. Thank you very much for your impressive effort on this!!! I just tried to build the current package, but failed. It doesn't compile with git-buildpackage, because it has changes to master relative to the upstream branch outside of debian/, please check "git diff master..upstream". Such a mixture of direct changes and clean patches in debian/patches is generally disapproved. Also, why do you want to get rid of webkit support? - Fabian ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Help getting started -- trying to build csound package
Hi Forrest, On 08/06/2012 05:52, Forrest Cahoon wrote: > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Forrest Cahoon > wrote: > >> It looks like I get to fix up the patch so it applies now. Any advice >> on how to do this? > > On closer inspection, I have found that the diff for > interfaces/CMakeLists.txt in > debian/patches/-backported-cmake-additions.diff has been applied > upstream. I could manually remove that diff from the file, I'm under > the impression I need to use quilt to manage these diffs so they'll > continue to play nicely with the build? I'm poring over the quilt > docs, but have yet to attain enlightenment. As a first step I suggest you to follow the first part of this page http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/modify.en.html And then use the alias dquilt. This avoid to constantly have to put parameters required (or desired) to use quilt for Debian packaging. Then have a look to debian/patches/series, which specify the order of the patches, and remember that quilt manage a stack of patches. With this in mind you can go back to the quilt documentation and try some commands on the package, especially pop, push, edit and refresh. I hope this is helpful. Bests, Giulio. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers