Re: Bootstrapping libav on a new architecture

2012-06-20 Thread Fabian Greffrath

Am 19.06.2012 18:46, schrieb Thorsten Glaser:

Ah, we’re really getting things like that? Nice!


It is a proposed extension to the debian/control file that is not yet 
accepted AFAICT. This is why I put it in README.source and not 
directly in debian/control.



Great, so a bootstrap libav should be decently easy.


Yep, from the next upload on it is.

 - Fabian

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Bug#665974: Diff between the two libmpc_0.1~r459-X.debian.tar.gz files

2012-06-20 Thread Fabian Greffrath

Am 19.06.2012 17:57, schrieb Han Boetes:

That is exactly the difference between a working and a non-working
binary. You're on the right track.


Alright. Since I consider CPPFLAGS and LDFLAGS quite harmless, could 
you please leave them as they are and rebuild another time with only 
CFLAGS reset to an empty string?


 - Fabian




___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Bootstrapping libav on a new architecture

2012-06-20 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Fabian Greffrath dixit:

 Great, so a bootstrap libav should be decently easy.

 Yep, from the next upload on it is.

Ok, thanks a lot. I’m still working on other packages like pygtk,
so no need to hurry for me.

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
FWIW, I'm quite impressed with mksh interactively. I thought it was much
*much* more bare bones. But it turns out it beats the living hell out of
ksh93 in that respect. I'd even consider it for my daily use if I hadn't
wasted half my life on my zsh setup. :-) -- Frank Terbeck in #!/bin/mksh

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: tagging 678182, severity of 678182 is wishlist

2012-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 678182 + pending
Bug #678182 [mixxx] mixxx: FTBFS in Ubuntu (gcc 4.7)
Added tag(s) pending.
 severity 678182 wishlist
Bug #678182 [mixxx] mixxx: FTBFS in Ubuntu (gcc 4.7)
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal'
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
678182: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678182
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Processing of mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5_amd64.changes

2012-06-20 Thread Debian FTP Masters
mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5.dsc
  mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5.debian.tar.gz
  mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5_amd64.deb
  mixxx-data_1.10.0~dfsg0-5_all.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#665974: Diff between the two libmpc_0.1~r459-X.debian.tar.gz files

2012-06-20 Thread Han Boetes
On 20-06-12 09:14, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
 Am 19.06.2012 17:57, schrieb Han Boetes:
 Alright. Since I consider CPPFLAGS and LDFLAGS quite harmless, could you
 please leave them as they are and rebuild another time with only CFLAGS
 reset to an empty string?

Most certainly. With only the CFLAGS cleared the library still works,
just like you suspected.


# Han





___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#665974: Diff between the two libmpc_0.1~r459-X.debian.tar.gz files

2012-06-20 Thread Fabian Greffrath

Am 20.06.2012 10:09, schrieb Han Boetes:

Most certainly. With only the CFLAGS cleared the library still works,
just like you suspected.


So it seems to choke on the stack-protector...



___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Is libav feature-complete?

2012-06-20 Thread Fabian Greffrath

Hi team,

just unteil yesterday, when Irebuilt libav several times to check the 
cond_enable() macros, I believed the libav packages we ship were 
feature-complete - at least in its -extra flavour. However, there are 
still a handfull of no messages emerged by the configure script. 
Just out of curiousity, what do they mean:



Sun medialib support  no


What is this? Sounds like it is only relevant on Sun/Solaris systems?


libdxva2 enabled  no


What is this? According to google, it stands for DirectX Video 
Acceleration. Is this relevant on non-Windows systems?



AVISynth enabled  no


What is this?


libfaac enabled   no


This is one of the features that would turn the license into nonfree 
and unredistributable. Also, libfaac has been REJECTED by our 
ftp-masters.



libnut enabledno


It seems that this was designated to become ffmpeg's own universal 
container format. Development seems to have stalled, I cannot find any 
stable relase of this library. I think the role of the universal 
container has been taken by MKV. Is this relevant at all?



libxavs enabled   no


This seems to be an obscure video codec developed in China in order to 
avoid patent fees towards the West. Even d-m.o does not have this 
packaged. Is this relevant? Would we do our Chinese friends a service 
by packaging and enabling this?



openssl enabled   no


This is the other feature that would turn the license into nonfree 
and unredistributable. Typical issue linking of GPL source against 
OpenSSL code.


So, how about enabling sun-medialib, dxva2, avisynth, libnut and 
libavs? What is missing to enable them and is it possible at all?


 - Fabian

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#665974: Diff between the two libmpc_0.1~r459-X.debian.tar.gz files

2012-06-20 Thread Han Boetes
With CFLAGS=-g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat
-Werror=format-security
it fails and with CFLAGS=-g -O2 it works fine indeed.




___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2012-06-20 Thread Debian FTP Masters



Accepted:
mixxx-data_1.10.0~dfsg0-5_all.deb
  to main/m/mixxx/mixxx-data_1.10.0~dfsg0-5_all.deb
mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5.debian.tar.gz
  to main/m/mixxx/mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5.debian.tar.gz
mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5.dsc
  to main/m/mixxx/mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5.dsc
mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5_amd64.deb
  to main/m/mixxx/mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5_amd64.deb


Changes:
mixxx (1.10.0~dfsg0-5) unstable; urgency=low
 .
  * Apply 1001-ftbfs_gcc47.patch to fix FTBFS with GCC 4.7 on Ubuntu too.
Thanks to Ilya Barygin for pointing out this. (Closes: #678182)
  * debian/copyright:
- Update to the new machine-readable format.
- Sort licenses stanzas
- Group files by license


Override entries for your package:
mixxx-data_1.10.0~dfsg0-5_all.deb - optional sound
mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5.dsc - source sound
mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5_amd64.deb - optional sound

Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 678182 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#678182: marked as done (mixxx: FTBFS in Ubuntu (gcc 4.7))

2012-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:13:57 +
with message-id e1shgz7-00084v...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#678182: fixed in mixxx 1.10.0~dfsg0-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #678182,
regarding mixxx: FTBFS in Ubuntu (gcc 4.7)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
678182: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678182
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: mixxx
Version: 1.10.0~dfsg0-4
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

Hello,

Please also add 1001-ftbfs_gcc47.patch (from bug #674335) to
debian/patches/ubuntu.series, otherwise patch is not applied and Ubuntu build
fails:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mixxx/1.10.0~dfsg0-4

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers precise-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'precise-updates'), (500, 'precise-security'), (500, 
'precise-proposed'), (500, 'precise'), (100, 'precise-backports')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-26-generic (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: mixxx
Source-Version: 1.10.0~dfsg0-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
mixxx, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

mixxx-data_1.10.0~dfsg0-5_all.deb
  to main/m/mixxx/mixxx-data_1.10.0~dfsg0-5_all.deb
mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5.debian.tar.gz
  to main/m/mixxx/mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5.debian.tar.gz
mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5.dsc
  to main/m/mixxx/mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5.dsc
mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5_amd64.deb
  to main/m/mixxx/mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 678...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org (supplier of updated mixxx package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:42:16 +0200
Source: mixxx
Binary: mixxx mixxx-data
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 1.10.0~dfsg0-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers 
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org
Description: 
 mixxx  - Digital Disc Jockey Interface
 mixxx-data - Digital Disc Jockey Interface -- data files
Closes: 678182
Changes: 
 mixxx (1.10.0~dfsg0-5) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Apply 1001-ftbfs_gcc47.patch to fix FTBFS with GCC 4.7 on Ubuntu too.
 Thanks to Ilya Barygin for pointing out this. (Closes: #678182)
   * debian/copyright:
 - Update to the new machine-readable format.
 - Sort licenses stanzas
 - Group files by license
Checksums-Sha1: 
 f581df21419c27e808ae5500c5b4e2adab168f68 2466 mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5.dsc
 8ed5642c4a64c43483c1aa5a40306687129c9532 15460 
mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5.debian.tar.gz
 1d76710d671e4259bf7b4794c87b7f2f87973029 2507964 mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5_amd64.deb
 c6e870a299286e5df9f53dc7601f88630cdf8d8b 9554196 
mixxx-data_1.10.0~dfsg0-5_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 3938e2b1ae853622bd72cf45cef26615fbf86cfe8e40962a6741eef67e3fcbac 2466 
mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5.dsc
 64ccfc2111abfe3252eea052804d29a49192127ab0c91e2eb84d92716971bc74 15460 
mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5.debian.tar.gz
 3c63f07858b1e0f1303b6be1b9e19beb0c2311abebb78598723b63f93b848233 2507964 
mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5_amd64.deb
 7f47667a523fc187a8027885e80e88e087d6f3c93a0ce9db3f4a2c69add164a7 9554196 
mixxx-data_1.10.0~dfsg0-5_all.deb
Files: 
 de18ea57ddc92e2491ebeae0b906085a 2466 sound optional mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5.dsc
 2ac407ce27cab379f17ce8204dac4a1e 15460 sound optional 
mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5.debian.tar.gz
 7fbb67fd8b5195660b23ca8eaa7908f6 2507964 sound optional 
mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5_amd64.deb
 6c05412a32509565ebeaf41f91e872a6 9554196 sound optional 
mixxx-data_1.10.0~dfsg0-5_all.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJP4YTtAAoJEOikiuUxHXZais4P/A67gRUzHWxBIgsUAcy+3wuH
64OXmEbm4wXifcYc3Dldc5aYM3sEob++TFhDpwNqKf5IT/zADtJ6PE8TiSClDZiJ
Py/KgjWIXwNUAMufDkDv+YnuypveDDT/JKSrHytSABDvKqYmL8VYsMQFWyjacjkt
XcJGhUr0P/WI4kj6/l2IFLqslAM31jv7Q4q207ZxtubIIraBmIb6ZbIsAd5Bx6ku

Bug#677823: Removed package(s) from unstable

2012-06-20 Thread Debian FTP Masters
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

  earcandy | 0.9+bzr12-2 | source, all

--- Reason ---
ROM; RC-buggy; dead upstream
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically.  But please check all old bugs, if they where closed
correctly or should have been re-assign to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 677...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/677823

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#677823: Removed package(s) from unstable

2012-06-20 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Version: 0.9+bzr12-2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package earcandy has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/677823

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#649875: marked as done (earcandy forces the max volume setting)

2012-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:01:27 +
with message-id e1shif9-0006tg...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#677823: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #649875,
regarding earcandy forces the max volume setting
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
649875: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649875
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: earcandy
Version: 0.9+bzr12-2
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

When you set a min/max range for a given player, instead of checking the
volume is between this range, it forces the volume of the application to
be at the maximum all time. It's very annoying.

I'd like earcandy to just ensure the constraints I set are met, and that
when e.g. I'm watching something in my browser (flash, movie, $whatnot)
fades the music player in the background to 0 until I'm done with this
browser plugin. Remembering the level of the music player before it
performed the fade-out so that it can fade it in back to the previous
level.

Right now, using earcandy with a music player means you risk to wake up
your neighbours (or worse your wife and children…) at night when you use
a new unconfigured music player because spotify insists on forcing the
sound to 100%. Yay. Not cool

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages earcandy depends on:
ii  pulseaudio  1.1-1  
ii  python  2.7.2-9
ii  python-dbus 0.84.0-2   
ii  python-gconf2.28.1-3   
ii  python-glade2   2.24.0-2   
ii  python-gobject  3.0.2-3
ii  python-gtk2 2.24.0-2   
ii  python-notify   0.1.1-3
ii  python-support  1.0.14 
ii  python-wnck 2.32.0-4+b1

earcandy recommends no packages.

earcandy suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Version: 0.9+bzr12-2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package earcandy has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/677823

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

---End Message---
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Bug#666446: marked as done (earcandy doesn't display GUI)

2012-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:01:27 +
with message-id e1shif9-0006tg...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#677823: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #666446,
regarding earcandy doesn't display GUI
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
666446: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666446
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: earcandy
Version: 0.9+bzr12-2
Severity: normal

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Starting earcandy doesn't result in a GUI. It just hangs until I
interrupt it with ctl-C:


- ---
ron@khufu:~$ earcandy 

** (process:16963): WARNING **: Trying to register gtype 'GMountMountFlags' as 
flags when in fact it is of type 'GEnum'

** (process:16963): WARNING **: Trying to register gtype 'GDriveStartFlags' as 
flags when in fact it is of type 'GEnum'

** (process:16963): WARNING **: Trying to register gtype 'GSocketMsgFlags' as 
flags when in fact it is of type 'GEnum'
DEBUG:root:lib :: Loaded library : libpulse.so

registered as dbus service...




^CTraceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/bin/earcandy, line 50, in module
gtk.main()
KeyboardInterrupt
- ---

(The Traceback line happens when I hit control-C, which I did after
about 30 seconds in this case).


- -- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.3.0-khufu-0 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages earcandy depends on:
ii  pulseaudio  1.1-3
ii  python  2.7.2-10
ii  python-dbus 0.84.0-3
ii  python-gconf2.28.1+dfsg-1
ii  python-glade2   2.24.0-3
ii  python-gobject  3.1.0-2
ii  python-gtk2 2.24.0-3
ii  python-notify   0.1.1-3
ii  python-support  1.0.14
ii  python-wnck 2.32.0+dfsg-1

earcandy recommends no packages.

earcandy suggests no packages.

- -- no debconf information

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=oJE/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Version: 0.9+bzr12-2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package earcandy has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/677823

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

---End Message---
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Bug#678151: also works without SYSLIBS

2012-06-20 Thread bart
I had to build again, and tried without any scons arguments.
Seems I was wrong about needing SYSLIBS=1.
I now seem to have a fully working default compile of ardour 2.8.13
(built from revision 12772).





___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Is libav feature-complete?

2012-06-20 Thread Fabian Greffrath

Am 20.06.2012 10:54, schrieb Fabian Greffrath:

Sun medialib support  no
libnut enabledno


Those two have been removed upstream meanwhile...


___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Is libav feature-complete?

2012-06-20 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote:
 Hi team,

 just unteil yesterday, when Irebuilt libav several times to check the
 cond_enable() macros, I believed the libav packages we ship were
 feature-complete - at least in its -extra flavour. However, there are still
 a handfull of no messages emerged by the configure script. Just out of
 curiousity, what do they mean:

 Sun medialib support      no


 What is this? Sounds like it is only relevant on Sun/Solaris systems?

AFAIUI yes.

 libdxva2 enabled          no


 What is this? According to google, it stands for DirectX Video Acceleration.
 Is this relevant on non-Windows systems?

I don't think that it is relevant for non-Windows systems.


 AVISynth enabled          no


 What is this?

http://avisynth.org/mediawiki/Main_Page

I think there is a Linux port of avisynth, but we haven't packaged it
(yet) and AFAIUI it is also not as usuable as the windows original.
However, that is AFAIUI and YMMV.

 libfaac enabled           no


 This is one of the features that would turn the license into nonfree and
 unredistributable. Also, libfaac has been REJECTED by our ftp-masters.

Well, partly correct. I guess we could get libfaac in non-free. I do
remember an old, unfinished patch to make libavcodec dlopen() it at
run-time, which we could finish.

 libnut enabled            no


 It seems that this was designated to become ffmpeg's own universal container
 format. Development seems to have stalled, I cannot find any stable relase
 of this library. I think the role of the universal container has been taken
 by MKV. Is this relevant at all?


I haven't seen any .nut file in the wild, so I'd rather wait for some
user requesting it. Also, I'm not sure how usable it is in its current
form.

 libxavs enabled           no


 This seems to be an obscure video codec developed in China in order to avoid
 patent fees towards the West. Even d-m.o does not have this packaged. Is
 this relevant? Would we do our Chinese friends a service by packaging and
 enabling this?

Probably, but as you say, we would first need libxavs in debian main.
I'd leave packaging this as exercise for our less experienced team
members.

 openssl enabled           no


 This is the other feature that would turn the license into nonfree and
 unredistributable. Typical issue linking of GPL source against OpenSSL
 code.

AFAIUI, libav can be linked against gnutls or openssl, and for debian
only the former makes sense.

 So, how about enabling sun-medialib, dxva2, avisynth, libnut and libavs?
 What is missing to enable them and is it possible at all?

From the list, I only see libxavcs.

Thanks for your feature review!

-- 
regards,
    Reinhard

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#665974: Diff between the two libmpc_0.1~r459-X.debian.tar.gz files

2012-06-20 Thread Fabian Greffrath

Am 20.06.2012 11:07, schrieb Han Boetes:

With CFLAGS=-g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat
-Werror=format-security
it fails and with CFLAGS=-g -O2 it works fine indeed.


1) Could you check if it works with the latest SVN snapshot of libmpc:
svn co http://svn.musepack.net/libmpc

2) Could you provide an example sound file somewhere? I do not have 
one myself.


From then on I'll leave it up to the actual maintainer to further 
investigate this issue. ;)


 - Fabian



___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#666674: Forwarding bug to upstream

2012-06-20 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
Forwarded 74 http://redmine.audacious-media-player.org/issues/132



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Forwarding bug to upstream

2012-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 Forwarded 74 http://redmine.audacious-media-player.org/issues/132
Bug #74 [audacious] Float Point Exception when playing some MP3 files
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'http://redmine.audacious-media-player.org/issues/132'.

End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
74: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=74
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#666674: marked as done (Float Point Exception when playing some MP3 files)

2012-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jun 2012 17:43:44 +0200
with message-id 4fe1efb0.5090...@igalia.com
and subject line Fixed on 3.2.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #74,
regarding Float Point Exception when playing some MP3 files
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
74: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=74
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: audacious
Version: 3.2.1-2
Severity: normal


Hi


Today when queuing a large list of mp3 files in audacious it crashed.

I tracked down the crash to two mp3 files.

When you try to load them on audacious (or when the queue tries to read the id3 
tags from them) audacious crashes.

The crash error is the following:


Floating point exception


And in dmesg I can read:

audacious[6001] trap divide error ip:7f9244401ca2 sp:7f9234e9eb70 error:0 in 
madplug.so[7f924440+4000]


I have uploaded the files here:

http://ftp.neutrino.es/audacious-fpe/

Try to play them with audacious (last one on debian/sid, that is 3.2.1-2 at 
this moment) and let me know if you can reproduce this error.


Any other player (I tried with vlc and audacity) open and plays this files 
without problems.



-- 
~~~
Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez   http://neutrino.es
Igalia - Free Software Engineeringhttp://www.igalia.com
~~~



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Version: 3.2.3-1
thanks


Upstream says this is fixed on 3.2.3

Just updated audacious audacious-plugins and audacious-plugins-data to
3.2.3 and played the files without problem.

So this problem is fixed with 3.2.3

Closing.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
---End Message---
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Bug#678315: smplayer: video freeze when window is bigger then some variable size

2012-06-20 Thread Ilya A. Potapov
Package: smplayer
Version: 0.8.0-1
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

  I have 1920x1080 screen. When i switch video to fullscreen, picture freezes,
but sound is played. Resizing smplayer window greater then some size causing
the same behaviour. 'Critical' size is constant for each video file, but varies
among different videos. Although It seems to depend like 'if width  max_width
OR height  max_heigth' since i tried videos with different aspect ratios.
Also, it seems to be dependent on size of video area, but not on video frame
size, because if i resize only width while height is constant (and frame size
is constant too), video is freezed after 'max_width'.

My video adapter is nVidia Quadro FX540 with newest nvidia drivers from debian
repositories. Debian is updated to unstable branch. I am using KDE 4.8.4 from
debian repositories. Please notice that i expirience this bug at least for two
monthes, and i have no such bug earlier.

I am ready to provide more useful information on request. Thank you.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.3.0-trunk-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages smplayer depends on:
ii  libc6   2.13-33
ii  libgcc1 1:4.7.1-1
ii  libqt4-network  4:4.8.2-1
ii  libqt4-xml  4:4.8.2-1
ii  libqtcore4  4:4.8.2-1
ii  libqtgui4   4:4.8.2-1
ii  libstdc++6  4.7.1-1
ii  mplayer 3:1.0~rc4+svn20120324-0.0
ii  zlib1g  1:1.2.7.dfsg-11

Versions of packages smplayer recommends:
ii  smplayer-themes0.1.20+dfsg-1
ii  smplayer-translations  0.8.0-1

smplayer suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#658040: Please enable hardened build flags

2012-06-20 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:10:27PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
 Package: mplayer
 Version: 2:1.0~rc4.dfsg1+svn34540-1
 Severity: important
 Tags: patch
 
 Please enable hardened build flags through dpkg-buildflags.
 
 Patch attached. The more stringent format string checks
 unveiled a missing format string in the streaming code
 and the GUI, please contact upstream on these.

What's the status? The freeze is getting really close.
Do you plan to include mplayer alongside with mplayer2 for Wheezy?

Cheers,
Moritz



___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#665974: Diff between the two libmpc_0.1~r459-X.debian.tar.gz files

2012-06-20 Thread Fabian Greffrath
tags 665974 patch upstream
thanks

Am Mittwoch, den 20.06.2012, 16:47 +0200 schrieb Fabian Greffrath:
 1) Could you check if it works with the latest SVN snapshot of libmpc:
 svn co http://svn.musepack.net/libmpc
 
 2) Could you provide an example sound file somewhere? I do not have 
 one myself.

Thanks for the example sound file.

The fix is in upstream SVN commit 479, please find the patch attached to
this mail.

Best regards,
Fabian

r479 | r2d | 2012-03-30 22:03:53 +0200 (Fri, 30 Mar 2012) | 1 line

add extern keyword to global variable declaration (don't know it worked without ... thanks Dmitry)
--- libmpc-0.1~r459.orig/libmpcdec/requant.h
+++ libmpc-0.1~r459/libmpcdec/requant.h
@@ -47,9 +47,9 @@ extern C {
 
 
 /* C O N S T A N T S */
-const mpc_uint8_t  Res_bit [18]; /// Bits per sample for chosen quantizer
-const MPC_SAMPLE_FORMAT __Cc[1 + 18]; /// Requantization coefficients
-const mpc_int16_t   __Dc[1 + 18]; /// Requantization offset
+extern const mpc_uint8_t  Res_bit [18]; /// Bits per sample for chosen quantizer
+extern const MPC_SAMPLE_FORMAT __Cc[1 + 18]; /// Requantization coefficients
+extern const mpc_int16_t   __Dc[1 + 18]; /// Requantization offset
 
 #define Cc (__Cc + 1)
 #define Dc (__Dc + 1)
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#665974: Diff between the two libmpc_0.1~r459-X.debian.tar.gz files

2012-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 665974 patch upstream
Bug #665974 [libmpcdec6] moc: does not play .mpc files with 'Error in the 
stream!' message
Bug #665753 [libmpcdec6] libmpcdec6: musepack files cannot be played with 
libmpcdec6 from testing/unstable
Bug #678113 [libmpcdec6] libmpcdec6: Can't play mpc files with libmpcdec6 
despite recent update
Added tag(s) upstream and patch.
Added tag(s) upstream and patch.
Added tag(s) upstream and patch.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
665753: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=665753
665974: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=665974
678113: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678113
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#665974: Diff between the two libmpc_0.1~r459-X.debian.tar.gz files

2012-06-20 Thread Han Boetes
Your patch seems to fix the issue.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/External_variable#Definition.2C_declaration_and_the_extern_keyword


# Han





___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#678347: libffado: FTBFS on powerpc

2012-06-20 Thread Touko Korpela
Package: libffado
Version: 2.0.99+svn2163-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)

Please look at https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libffado
2.0.99+svn2163 fails to build on powerpc



___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers