Processed: Re: jack_control broken (obvious syntax errors)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 675719 + fixed-upstream Bug #675719 [jackd2] jack_control broken (obvious syntax errors) Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 675719: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675719 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#675719: jack_control broken (obvious syntax errors)
tags 675719 + fixed-upstream thanks Please see https://github.com/jackaudio/jack2/commit/e54729a300feb86e860df3553fcb135fa266a9c9 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#682948: Incorrect versioning scheme disturbs upgrading
Package: blender Version: 2.63a-1 Severity: important Please don't change the versioning scheme, and don't use upstream version string a, b, etc. Old blender package for 2.49b used the package version 2.49.2 to avoid the upgrade issue. Changelog of 2.49.2~dfsg-1 says: This is actually 2.49b, but using a +dfsg suffix breaks comparing 2.49+dfsg and 2.49b+dfsg. Use .2 instead of b accordingly. And switch to using a ~dfsg suffix. So, 2.63a should be translated into 2.63.1 for the same reason. In my PPA in Launchpad, I have maintained blender trunk package for Ubuntu and the package version uses +svn suffix like 2.63.1+svn49102-0irie1~precise1. Since Debian package system compares the versions as 2.63a+svn 2.63+svn 2.63.1+svn, if the official Debian/Ubuntu package uses the wrong versioning scheme such as 2.63a, I can no longer provide the trunk packages having a version suffix +svn. -- IRIE Shinsuke ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processed: blender numbering
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 682948 wishlist Bug #682948 [blender] Incorrect versioning scheme disturbs upgrading Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'important' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 682948: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682948 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
python-pyknon_1.0-1_amd64.changes is NEW
Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of the override file. It is ok otherwise, so please be patient. New packages are usually added to the override file about once a week. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processing of python-pyknon_1.0-1_amd64.changes
python-pyknon_1.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: python-pyknon_1.0-1.dsc python-pyknon_1.0.orig.tar.gz python-pyknon_1.0-1.debian.tar.gz python-pyknon_1.0-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: intent to orphan zynaddsubfx
Hi, On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote: Hello, I intend to orphan zynaddsubfx. Before doing that I invite two additional DD's to confirm that they agree with this intent with ma...@debian.org in cc. the D-Multimedia-M team is already on it. Cheers! -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
RFS: zynaddsubfx/2.4.0-1.3 [NMU] [RC]
Hello, I intended to work on a few packages, mainly audio-related, in order to discover the debian packaging process and contribute to fix wheezy bugs. I might apply for DM and join the multimedia team. Meanwhile, please consider sponsoring my zynaddsubfx package. http://mentors.debian.net/package/zynaddsubfx http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/zynaddsubfx/zynaddsubfx_2.4.0-1.3.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Fix bank loading. (Closes: #661887). * Build with libjack-dev or libjack-jackd2-dev. (Closes: #602194). * Fix debhelper-but-no-misc-depends zynaddsubfx. * Fix patch-system-but-direct-changes-in-diff src/main.cpp. * Fix hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/bin/zynaddsubfx. Thank you, Christophe Siraut On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 08:26 +, debian-devel-digest-requ...@lists.debian.org wrote: Hi, On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote: Hello, I intend to orphan zynaddsubfx. Before doing that I invite two additional DD's to confirm that they agree with this intent with ma...@debian.org in cc. the D-Multimedia-M team is already on it. Cheers! ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#682948: Incorrect versioning scheme disturbs upgrading
I forgot to say that actually there were official deb packages using +cvs suffix in the past (ex. 2.25b+cvs.2003.02.17-1). So, +svn suffix might be used for the future versions of the official packages. I mean the versioning scheme like 2.63.1 is generally necessary, not only for my PPA's packages. -- IRIE Shinsuke ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#682948: Incorrect versioning scheme disturbs upgrading
On 12-07-27 at 10:02pm, IRIE Shinsuke wrote: I forgot to say that actually there were official deb packages using +cvs suffix in the past (ex. 2.25b+cvs.2003.02.17-1). So, +svn suffix might be used for the future versions of the official packages. I mean the versioning scheme like 2.63.1 is generally necessary, not only for my PPA's packages. I do not find it necessary for Debian to follow a naming scheme used in Ubuntu, just as upstream should not worry about Debian when they choose a naming scheme. Ubuntu developers are strongly encouraged to help maintain packages in Debian as a better alternative to try second-guess future naming of Debian packages. When Ubuntu introduces packages in their repos that does not exist in Debian, there is a real risk of diverging from Debian. It only makes sense to me to treat Debian as upstream to Ubuntu - not the opposite. Regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#682948: marked as done (Incorrect versioning scheme disturbs upgrading)
Your message dated Fri, 27 Jul 2012 16:40:24 +0200 with message-id 20120727144024.GA13681@localhost and subject line Re: Bug#682948: Incorrect versioning scheme disturbs upgrading has caused the Debian Bug report #682948, regarding Incorrect versioning scheme disturbs upgrading to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 682948: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682948 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: blender Version: 2.63a-1 Severity: important Please don't change the versioning scheme, and don't use upstream version string a, b, etc. Old blender package for 2.49b used the package version 2.49.2 to avoid the upgrade issue. Changelog of 2.49.2~dfsg-1 says: This is actually 2.49b, but using a +dfsg suffix breaks comparing 2.49+dfsg and 2.49b+dfsg. Use .2 instead of b accordingly. And switch to using a ~dfsg suffix. So, 2.63a should be translated into 2.63.1 for the same reason. In my PPA in Launchpad, I have maintained blender trunk package for Ubuntu and the package version uses +svn suffix like 2.63.1+svn49102-0irie1~precise1. Since Debian package system compares the versions as 2.63a+svn 2.63+svn 2.63.1+svn, if the official Debian/Ubuntu package uses the wrong versioning scheme such as 2.63a, I can no longer provide the trunk packages having a version suffix +svn. -- IRIE Shinsuke ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package: blender Version: 2.63a-1 Hi! On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 04:12:41PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On 12-07-27 at 10:02pm, IRIE Shinsuke wrote: I forgot to say that actually there were official deb packages using +cvs suffix in the past (ex. 2.25b+cvs.2003.02.17-1). So, +svn suffix might be used for the future versions of the official packages. I mean the versioning scheme like 2.63.1 is generally necessary, not only for my PPA's packages. I do not find it necessary for Debian to follow a naming scheme used in Ubuntu, just as upstream should not worry about Debian when they choose a naming scheme. Ubuntu developers are strongly encouraged to help maintain packages in Debian as a better alternative to try second-guess future naming of Debian packages. When Ubuntu introduces packages in their repos that does not exist in Debian, there is a real risk of diverging from Debian. It only makes sense to me to treat Debian as upstream to Ubuntu - not the opposite. Exactly! That's why I downgraded bug severity from important to wishlist. Thanks Jonas for pointing this out with his usual aplomb. ;-) I'm not going to use SVN revisions other than the stable releases. So Debian Blender package is not going to face this issue at all. Since I'm actually the only active maintainer for this package, I don't see any issue in naming using upstream's version numbering. Sorry if you disagree, but I'm closing this bug report, pointless from my point of view. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A---End Message--- ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#682948: Incorrect versioning scheme disturbs upgrading
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 severity 682948 wishlist thanks On 07/27/2012 09:12 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On 12-07-27 at 10:02pm, IRIE Shinsuke wrote: I forgot to say that actually there were official deb packages using +cvs suffix in the past (ex. 2.25b+cvs.2003.02.17-1). So, +svn suffix might be used for the future versions of the official packages. I mean the versioning scheme like 2.63.1 is generally necessary, not only for my PPA's packages. I do not find it necessary for Debian to follow a naming scheme used in Ubuntu, just as upstream should not worry about Debian when they choose a naming scheme. Ubuntu developers are strongly encouraged to help maintain packages in Debian as a better alternative to try second-guess future naming of Debian packages. When Ubuntu introduces packages in their repos that does not exist in Debian, there is a real risk of diverging from Debian. It only makes sense to me to treat Debian as upstream to Ubuntu - not the opposite. This is not an Ubuntu issue, but a PPA issue. Ubuntu at the moment syncs blender unchanged from Debian. So, I'm reducing this to severity wishlist as it doesn't affect an official archive. I'll leave it to Jonas to mark wontfix if he feels it's appropriate as I don't actively work on this. I'd suggest using the next release with a ~vcs suffix, so if there's a 2.63, do a 2.63a~svn upload. Also, this is only an issue for the release without a letter. AIUI, the version scheme has always been to follow upstream except in the case where upgrades would break. Since the +dfsg suffix is not needed anymore, the official packages no longer have an issue. I'd suggest you adjust your scripts to handle the upstream versioning appropriately. Thanks, MIcah -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlASrH8ACgkQTniv4aqX/VkWSQCghtfIZG8XfYV413xbZfRLpPRe yH0AoIj1ZHF05PfBHw/UhhLLZWsZFehF =Y1B4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#682948: Incorrect versioning scheme disturbs upgrading
On 12-07-27 at 09:58am, Micah Gersten wrote: This is not an Ubuntu issue, but a PPA issue. I don't care, really (and sorry I confused matters by mentioning a specific Debian derivative at all). What I care about is if packages follow our stream of changes - i.e. upstream/downstream relationships. Debian has the Blender project as upstream - not Ubuntu nor any PPA. Which makes any other deb package of blender downstream to Debian. I am happy to collaborate directly with any downstream of Debian, no matter if they are further down or directly derived from Debian. (maybe they are best off only coordinating with their direct upstream - but that is none of our concern, really). I'll leave it to Jonas to mark wontfix if he feels it's appropriate as I don't actively work on this. For the record I also do not work on this package specifically. I am a Debian Developer and involved in the Multimedia team, and care about our relationship with derivatives. I'd suggest using the next release with a ~vcs suffix, so if there's a 2.63, do a 2.63a~svn upload. Sorry, but I find it bad advice to try second-guess your upstream: You don't know if 2.63 will be followed by 2.63a (even if that was a pattern used by your upstream in the past)! Use ~ to indicate just below and + to indicate just above. NB! If you consider Debian upstream to you, then Debian (more than the Blender project) is where you should stay just above or just below. You are free to not consider Debian upstream to you - even if yor packaging is derived from Debian: DFSG-free software grants you the freedom to fork! Just please decide if you are playing with us or by yourself (e.g. file bugreports here only when playing with us). Regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
RFS: zynaddsubfx/2.4.0-1.3 [NMU] [RC]
Sorry I was not aware of pkg-multimedia-commits list, it appears an agreement was reached for maintainer change two weeks ago, and Multimedia Maintainers are active on packaging zynaddsubfx since then. Cheers, Chris ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: intent to orphan zynaddsubfx
2012/7/27 Bart Martens ba...@debian.org: On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:01:08AM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote: I intend to orphan zynaddsubfx. Before doing that I invite two additional DD's to confirm that they agree with this intent with ma...@debian.org in cc. the D-Multimedia-M team is already on it. Was this agreed with the maintainer ? I may have overlooked that. Maybe, for clarity, you could submit an ITA bug explaining that the maintainer agreed to hand over maintenance to the D-Multimedia-M team. Hello, I has been in contact with Eduardo Macan ma...@debian.org and he agreed that me and D-Multimedia-M team will take care about zynaddsubfx. I didn't submit an ITA bug because package haven't been orphaned. I already working on it , but I am not hurrying because freeze time ;) http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/zynaddsubfx.git;a=shortlog regards mira ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#682948: Incorrect versioning scheme disturbs upgrading
Hi, 12/07/27, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: I'm not going to use SVN revisions other than the stable releases. So Debian Blender package is not going to face this issue at all. Since I'm actually the only active maintainer for this package, I don't see any issue in naming using upstream's version numbering. Hmm... I see, that is what I have worried about. What about another numbering scheme using . between the minor version and the version character as follows? 2.63, 2.63.a, 2.63.b, ... This scheme is very similar to the upstream version numbering, and should never cause the upgrade issue even if a version suffix is necessary. -- IRIE Shinsuke ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#683042: debian/copyright: No information of embedded external libraries
Package: blender Version: 2.63a-1 debian/copyright doesn't include the copyright information of the external libraries such as libmv, Eigen3, and Bullet Physics which are included in orig.tar.bz2 file and will be statically linked. Also, there are some codes partially imported from external projects. For example, functions for detecting a pen tablet device were copied from Wine 1.1.13 (See intern/ghost/intern/GHOST_WindowX11.cpp). -- IRIE Shinsuke ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#683046: Thumbnailer is not registered automatically
Package: blender Version: 2.63a-1 blender-thumbnailer.py is installed in /usr/bin, but not working unless we manually register it by creating .thumbnailer file in ~/.local/share/thumbnailers. I think deb package should make system-wide setting for it, so please install /usr/share/thumbnailers/blender.thumnailer as follows: START === [Thumbnailer Entry] TryExec=blender-thumbnailer.py Exec=blender-thumbnailer.py %u %o MimeType=application/x-blender; E N D === -- IRIE Shinsuke ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#683046: Thumbnailer is not registered automatically
Oops, sorry, the thumbnailer is installed in /usr/lib/blender/scripts/. -- IRIE Shinsuke ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#683046: Thumbnailer is not registered automatically
The thumbnailer should work with the following .thumbnailer file: START === [Thumbnailer Entry] TryExec=/usr/lib/blender/scripts/blender-thumbnailer.py Exec=/usr/lib/blender/scripts/blender-thumbnailer.py %i %o MimeType=application/x-blender; E N D === -- IRIE Shinsuke ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
emprestimo @ 3%
Bom dia senhor / senhora: Eu sou Marian Wilmot, um chefe financeiro de um empréstimo privado agência ativa Serviços Financeiros, Reino Unido. Estou aqui para apresentar um programa de empréstimo que vai ajudar a melhorar a sua situação financeira, económica e aliviá-lo de todo da crise financeira / problema. Oferecemos empréstimo a curto e longo prazo para os clientes a uma taxa de 3%, como empréstimo de carro, empréstimo da empresa, etc Se você estiver interessado em receber um empréstimo de nós, pode contactar-nos através deste e-mail: active_finservi...@admin.in.th ou Tel: +447045 734550. Também fornecendo conselhos para preencher o formulário abaixo: Nome: Sexo: País / endereço: Montante necessário: Duração do empréstimo: Finalidade do empréstimo: Tel: Obrigado por sua compreensão. Marian Wilmot ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
