Re: return of the mpalyer package?!
Miguel A. Colón Vélez debian.mic...@gmail.com writes: On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 6:34 AM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@debian.org wrote: Hi all, has anyone seen this yet? https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/mplayer_2:1.1.1+r37401-1.html Does anyone know what is going on, has anyone been informed, has anyone been contacted by the package maintainer or sponsor (CC:ed)? I mean, even if this package was removed from unstable and was not in jessie, it is still a pkg-multimedia package, or not? So this tastes like package hijack to me. Please clarify. Hello: I saw the ITP on 2014-12-01 and contacted the person on IRC the same day (~2 weeks after the ITP). micove hello ... I'm from the debian multimedia team I was about to commit some changes to the git repo but I noticed that you had filed a ITP micove would you like to join the team? frozencemetery hi, nice to meet you. Sure; I'd love to cooperate with you all! This is my first debian package, so apologies if I'm a little slow on thing He joined the #debian-multimedia channel since that day. My understanding was that he was going to formally join the team and help maintain the package under the team umbrella. I had not heard from him since that day so I assumed he was no longer interested in packaging MPlayer. Hi, I think it was a little rude to assume this. You could have asked him on IRC or on the ITP bug, so as to avoid duplicate work. The delay in uploading was actually largely my fault for being slow in sponsoring. My understanding was that Robbie attempted to go through the procedure to join the team but that there was some miscommunication so no progress happened. As a sponsor I've been extremely happy with Robbie's work on this package, especially considering it's his first. He has been very responsive to feedback about the packaging and has been proactive about working with upstream to merge Debian patches. He's the sort of person I would like to see become a developer and I hope we can make him feel welcome in Debian. Regards, Dafydd ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#792921: [sparc64] linking against libx264 crashes runtime linker
Package: x264,libc6
Version: x264/2:0.142.2431+gita5831aa-1
Version: libc6/2.19-19
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-sp...@lists.debian.org
Dear Maintainers,
The x264 package on sparc64 is unusable, because linking against
the libx264 library causes the runtime linker to crash:
$ cat main.c
int main () {
return 0;
}
$ rm ./main
rm: cannot remove './main': No such file or directory
$ cc -g -lx264 main.c -o main
$ ./main; echo $?
138
$ gdb --batch -ex r -ex bt -ex q --args ./main
[tcsetpgrp failed in terminal_inferior: Inappropriate ioctl for device]
[tcsetpgrp failed in terminal_inferior: Inappropriate ioctl for device]
[tcsetpgrp failed in terminal_inferior: Inappropriate ioctl for device]
Program received signal SIGBUS, Bus error.
0xf801cda4 in elf_dynamic_do_Rela (skip_ifunc=optimized out, lazy=0,
nrelative=optimized out, relsize=optimized out, reladdr=optimized out,
map=0xf80100023570) at do-rel.h:111
111 do-rel.h: No such file or directory.
#0 0xf801cda4 in elf_dynamic_do_Rela (skip_ifunc=optimized out,
lazy=0, nrelative=optimized out, relsize=optimized out, reladdr=optimized
out, map=0xf80100023570) at do-rel.h:111
#1 _dl_relocate_object (scope=optimized out, reloc_mode=optimized out,
consider_profiling=optimized out, consider_profiling@entry=0) at
dl-reloc.c:264
#2 0xf8013f2c in dl_main (phdr=optimized out, phnum=optimized out,
user_entry=optimized out, auxv=optimized out) at rtld.c:2205
#3 0xf80100018be4 in _dl_sysdep_start
(start_argptr=start_argptr@entry=0x7fefdc0, dl_main=0xf8011e00
dl_main) at ../elf/dl-sysdep.c:249
#4 0xf8015630 in _dl_start_final (arg=0x7fefdc0) at rtld.c:331
#5 _dl_start (arg=0x7fefdc0) at rtld.c:557
#6 0xf80116ec in _start () from /lib64/ld-linux.so.2
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
I'm not sure what the cause for this crash is, so I'm filing this bug
against both packages. Please reassign as appropriate.
Best regards,
Andreas
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processing of blender_2.74+dfsg0-4_sourceupload.changes
blender_2.74+dfsg0-4_sourceupload.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: blender_2.74+dfsg0-4.dsc blender_2.74+dfsg0-4.debian.tar.xz blender-data_2.74+dfsg0-4_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
blender_2.74+dfsg0-4_sourceupload.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 08:39:33 +0200 Source: blender Binary: blender blender-data blender-dbg Architecture: all source Version: 2.74+dfsg0-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: Matteo F. Vescovi m...@debian.org Description: blender- Very fast and versatile 3D modeller/renderer blender-data - Very fast and versatile 3D modeller/renderer - data package blender-dbg - Very fast and versatile 3D modeller/renderer - debug package Closes: 790970 Changes: blender (2.74+dfsg0-4) unstable; urgency=medium . * debian/patches/: patchset updated (Closes: #790970) - 0003-filter_docs_to_install.patch dropped - #0004 renamed to #0003 - #0005 renamed to #0004 - #0006 renamed to #0005 - #0008 renamed to #0006 - 0007-look_for_droid_ttf_with_fontconfig.patch improved * debian/control: libjemalloc-dev b-dep added * debian/copyright: license names fixed * debian/rules: useless license text files dropped * debian/TODO: obsolete file dropped Checksums-Sha1: def57834ba52851449e8916f2b85cf936b1a45fd 2904 blender_2.74+dfsg0-4.dsc 7b6f10cd4d608b9cde932c951ac616734537f097 42980 blender_2.74+dfsg0-4.debian.tar.xz 770d1bf5d8d719ae8251021b4523f0ef4a21bc4b 8225700 blender-data_2.74+dfsg0-4_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 73d47786722ace153f77e70a585813abaa4ff393e3dc296f867449c73bd5593d 2904 blender_2.74+dfsg0-4.dsc aef472f4a56e2f19c9acf313c144ef4dcdd2c8a1ef35741b8e902d01546516f1 42980 blender_2.74+dfsg0-4.debian.tar.xz 1ae008f752350e0e53e31615db7e683c08882c9ffaee8a088e8111bc664aa4c3 8225700 blender-data_2.74+dfsg0-4_all.deb Files: f398dbac8e84fd32d41f5ae8bf99a51f 2904 graphics optional blender_2.74+dfsg0-4.dsc e7d2125cceeef38eeffdf3f397442298 42980 graphics optional blender_2.74+dfsg0-4.debian.tar.xz 8015b075f377d146a59fe713870f1ff9 8225700 graphics optional blender-data_2.74+dfsg0-4_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: Debian powered! iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVrLAnXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRGM0REMDlGOERBODdEMURGNTA0NkM5OUIw NjEyRjQ5NDRFQ0RDRDVBAAoJEAYS9JROzc1a1+YP/juWQ6rhnUtbn7ERCwqgPTIo MEFlSF976mwAxqf+ZjMrX0DJi4a7Rz+Juw8Sa2SJNh7E4MvT0S2f2o3p/P+A/6RP zrtE/2BF3wCw1B4OQpbPQw8xemG1g+qIiE9ChcBpw4jSeNJBJWUkFJxhp358Qpn3 lmheIf40fHbOhYvHGU8sVOqsEor5TFXK2lLKZYTlbW26VxyWFAMh7mDrANA0uLAv OcGXdeTDqAO325cPtQ+oSWeJKjb3QpkCzoBN+3OLEYMzUHhCXAsRLsjkxkvXSftH 68ePUpQZ/RkJr0pTowMy+gGTif2aDzwKzXIXqnUYtw/2RsXGiWV/OVB/EaI8fWFJ yUiNLUTTDbsOyno2a8cpisQz6Trf26eekj3mK5YXMKH5lTAx6cb9VXdhFrJcVjrQ 9QitDXWkLehVVvuaPdB92AtRIxuQXpQ6qQBSlpwkGL3P+JMLfZynRQMqR79K1oZo iL0D8QX7X3SCYZkhZDlAAXHnoZ2KVlLdoQ1LSqAPIJff/qldLpFRMx8/O1xldYys oGrmfRgLUkDRNhFgfRadAMVd2X6zKe0LKPzsNwK2kid0ouK4fFYSKGEFzP3MiiLd uUcRFicH12BThiLOaeTPAwM+BeKWFupG0lAEnwtkT88zhw6vkSdwXoUH3usm/bs4 qJ9hFAiprEcp6W4kKXHQ =tFLZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#790970: marked as done (international fonts are missing (regression))
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jul 2015 09:20:00 + with message-id e1zh7eu-0003rt...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#790970: fixed in blender 2.74+dfsg0-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #790970, regarding international fonts are missing (regression) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 790970: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790970 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: blender Version: 2.74+dfsg0-2~bpo8+1 Severity: normal The blender version in stable (2.72.b) supports international fonts, see File - User Preferences... - System - International Fonts (checkbox on the lower right hand side) In the backported version the list of supported languages is, unfortunately, completely empty. -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.1 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-586 Locale: LANG=de_CH.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_CH.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages blender depends on: ii blender-data 2.74+dfsg0-2~bpo8+1 ii fonts-droid 1:4.4.4r2-6 ii libavcodec56 6:11.4-1~deb8u1 ii libavdevice55 6:11.4-1~deb8u1 ii libavformat56 6:11.4-1~deb8u1 ii libavutil54 6:11.4-1~deb8u1 ii libboost-date-time1.55.0 1.55.0+dfsg-3 ii libboost-filesystem1.55.0 1.55.0+dfsg-3 ii libboost-locale1.55.0 1.55.0+dfsg-3 ii libboost-regex1.55.0 1.55.0+dfsg-3 ii libboost-system1.55.0 1.55.0+dfsg-3 ii libboost-thread1.55.0 1.55.0+dfsg-3 ii libc6 2.19-18 ii libfftw3-double3 3.3.4-2 ii libfreetype6 2.5.2-3 ii libgcc1 1:4.9.2-10 ii libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1] 10.3.2-1 ii libglew1.10 1.10.0-3 ii libglu1-mesa [libglu1]9.0.0-2 ii libgomp1 4.9.2-10 ii libilmbase6 1.0.1-6.1 ii libjack-jackd2-0 [libjack-0.116] 1.9.10+20140719git3eb0ae6a~dfsg-2 ii libjpeg62-turbo 1:1.3.1-12 ii libjs-jquery 1.7.2+dfsg-3.2 ii libjs-jquery-ui 1.10.1+dfsg-1 ii libopenal11:1.15.1-5 ii libopencolorio1 1.0.9~dfsg0-3 ii libopenexr6 1.6.1-8 ii libopenimageio1.4 1.4.14~dfsg0-1 ii libopenjpeg5 1:1.5.2-3 ii libpng12-01.2.50-2+b2 ii libpython3.4 3.4.2-1 ii libsndfile1 1.0.25-9.1 ii libstdc++64.9.2-10 ii libswscale3 6:11.4-1~deb8u1 ii libtiff5 4.0.3-12.3 ii libx11-6 2:1.6.2-3 ii libxi62:1.7.4-1+b2 ii libxxf86vm1 1:1.1.3-1+b1 ii zlib1g1:1.2.8.dfsg-2+b1 blender recommends no packages. blender suggests no packages. -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: blender Source-Version: 2.74+dfsg0-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of blender, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 790...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matteo F. Vescovi m...@debian.org (supplier of updated blender package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 08:39:33 +0200 Source: blender Binary: blender blender-data blender-dbg Architecture: all source Version: 2.74+dfsg0-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: Matteo F. Vescovi m...@debian.org Description: blender- Very fast and versatile 3D modeller/renderer blender-data - Very fast and versatile 3D modeller/renderer - data
Re: Uploading ffmpeg 2.7.2-1
Hi, On 20.07.2015 13:48, Reinhard Tartler wrote: did you already coordinate this transition with the release team? Yes. What is the transition tracking bug? #792619 [1], see also the transition tracker [2]. We must not start a transition of this size without coordination, in particular given that we are aware of a couple of FTBFS. This all needs the be documented first before we can proceed with uploads to unstable. Balint, please don't upload this to unstable, experimental would be fine though. Jonathan Wiltshire from the release team asked me to go ahead [3], so an upload to unstable is correct. Best regards, Andreas 1: https://bugs.debian.org/792619 2: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ffmpeg-libav.html 3: https://bugs.debian.org/792619#34 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Uploading ffmpeg 2.7.2-1
did you already coordinate this transition with the release team? What is the transition tracking bug? We must not start a transition of this size without coordination, in particular given that we are aware of a couple of FTBFS. This all needs the be documented first before we can proceed with uploads to unstable. Balint, please don't upload this to unstable, experimental would be fine though. Best, Reinhard On Mon, Jul 20, 2015, 4:36 AM Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Bálint and Reinhard, I merged the experimental branch into the master branch and imported FFmpeg 2.7.2. It would be great if one of you would upload this for the transition. Best regards, Andreas ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#792997: python-pyo: ship pd-pyo
Package: python-pyo Version: 0.7.5-2 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, python-pyo upstream includes a Pd-external for using pyo from within Pure Data. it would be nice if this external could be shipped in a separate package pd-pyo. caveats: python-pyo currently includes a local copy of m_pd.h, which is very outdated (taken from Pd-0.41-4). Instead any external should be build against the headers provided by the puredata-dev package (the easiest way would probably be to patch pyo~.c to include pd/m_pd.h instead of m_pd.h) -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers oldoldstable APT policy: (500, 'oldoldstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'oldstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 4.0.0-2-686-pae (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_AT.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_AT.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages python-pyo depends on: ii libc6 2.19-19 ii liblo7 0.28-5 ii libportaudio2 19+svn20140130-1 ii libportmidi0 1:184-2.2 ii libsndfile11.0.25-9.1 ii python 2.7.9-1 Versions of packages python-pyo recommends: ii jackd2 1.9.10+20140719git3eb0ae6a~dfsg-2 ii python-pil.imagetk [python-imaging-tk] 2.8.1-1 ii python-tk 2.7.9-1 ii python-wxgtk3.0 3.0.2.0+dfsg-1 python-pyo suggests no packages. -- no debconf information ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: return of the mpalyer package?!
Hi, I think it was a little rude to assume this. You could have asked him on IRC or on the ITP bug, so as to avoid duplicate work. The delay in uploading was actually largely my fault for being slow in sponsoring. I disagree with this assessment. Is usually the responsibility of any new maintainer to contact the old maintainer for any package they want to salvage/hijack. In this case I made the initial contact as a way to show that work was actually being done in the package and asked him to join the Team since help is always appreciated. Since the other party knew the package was being worked on. It's rude to upload anything. My understanding was that Robbie attempted to go through the procedure to join the team but that there was some miscommunication so no progress happened. He did ask, http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/2015-March/043292.html Hopefully someone with admin right in the group can help to add him if he is still interested and there are no objections. I'm CC Reinhard to see if he can help. Cheers, Miguel ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Uploading ffmpeg 2.7.2-1
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote: did you already coordinate this transition with the release team? What is the transition tracking bug? The release team is awake and reactive on this: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=792619 AFAICS only the upload remains. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Uploading ffmpeg 2.7.2-1
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 7:59 AM Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, On 20.07.2015 13:48, Reinhard Tartler wrote: did you already coordinate this transition with the release team? Yes. What is the transition tracking bug? #792619 [1], see also the transition tracker [2]. We must not start a transition of this size without coordination, in particular given that we are aware of a couple of FTBFS. This all needs the be documented first before we can proceed with uploads to unstable. Balint, please don't upload this to unstable, experimental would be fine though. Jonathan Wiltshire from the release team asked me to go ahead [3], so an upload to unstable is correct. Thanks, I missed that email. I've just built and uploaded the package to unstable. Thanks for your work on it! Reinhard ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#780344: marked as done (ffmpeg: encoding broken source is a success)
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jul 2015 12:49:55 + with message-id e1zhaw3-8w...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#780344: fixed in ffmpeg 7:2.7.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #780344, regarding ffmpeg: encoding broken source is a success to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 780344: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=780344 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: ffmpeg Version: 7:2.5.4-1 Severity: normal Hello, I noticed that a video is broken (truncated). I tried to detect the breakage with ffmpeg in order to be able to detect possible breakage of other video files but while ffmpeg prints a frame error it returns success on finishing encode: $ ffmpeg -v warning -i /scratch/dwhelper/Mill_CPU_for_Humans_-_Part_2.mp4 -f null /dev/null ; echo $? [null @ 0x1554880] Encoder did not produce proper pts, making some up. [h264 @ 0x1645bc0] AVC: nal size 5421 Last message repeated 1 times [h264 @ 0x1645bc0] no frame! 0 Can the error reporting be fixed for programmatic error detection? Thanks Michal -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (910, 'testing'), (900, 'stable'), (410, 'unstable'), (400, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.18.0-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages ffmpeg depends on: ii libavcodec-ffmpeg567:2.5.4-1 ii libavdevice-ffmpeg56 7:2.5.4-1 ii libavfilter-ffmpeg57:2.5.4-1 ii libavformat-ffmpeg56 7:2.5.4-1 ii libavresample-ffmpeg2 7:2.5.4-1 ii libavutil-ffmpeg54 7:2.5.4-1 ii libc6 2.19-13 ii libpostproc-ffmpeg53 7:2.5.4-1 ii libsdl1.2debian1.2.15-10+b1 ii libswresample-ffmpeg1 7:2.5.4-1 ii libswscale-ffmpeg3 7:2.5.4-1 ii libvdpau1 0.8-3 ii libx11-6 2:1.6.2-3 Versions of packages ffmpeg recommends: ii qt-faststart 7:2.5.4-1 ffmpeg suggests no packages. -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: ffmpeg Source-Version: 7:2.7.2-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ffmpeg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 780...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com (supplier of updated ffmpeg package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 10:23:49 +0200 Source: ffmpeg Binary: ffmpeg ffmpeg-dbg ffmpeg-doc libavcodec-ffmpeg56 libavcodec-ffmpeg-extra56 libavcodec-extra libavcodec-dev libavdevice-ffmpeg56 libavdevice-dev libavfilter-ffmpeg5 libavfilter-dev libavformat-ffmpeg56 libavformat-dev libavresample-ffmpeg2 libavresample-dev libavutil-ffmpeg54 libavutil-dev libpostproc-ffmpeg53 libpostproc-dev libswresample-ffmpeg1 libswresample-dev libswscale-ffmpeg3 libswscale-dev libav-tools-links libavcodec-ffmpeg-dev libavdevice-ffmpeg-dev libavfilter-ffmpeg-dev libavformat-ffmpeg-dev libavresample-ffmpeg-dev libavutil-ffmpeg-dev libpostproc-ffmpeg-dev libswresample-ffmpeg-dev libswscale-ffmpeg-dev Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 7:2.7.2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Reinhard Tartler siret...@debian.org Changed-By: Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com Description: ffmpeg - Tools for transcoding, streaming and playing of multimedia files ffmpeg-dbg - Debug symbols for the FFmpeg multimedia framework ffmpeg-doc - Documentation of the FFmpeg multimedia framework libav-tools-links - Compatibility links for libav-tools (transitional package) libavcodec-dev - FFmpeg library with de/encoders for audio/video codecs - developm libavcodec-extra - FFmpeg library with extra codecs (metapackage) libavcodec-ffmpeg-dev - FFmpeg library with de/encoders - development files (transitional libavcodec-ffmpeg-extra56 - FFmpeg library with additional de/encoders for
Re: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing
On 07/09/15 11:41, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: FYI: The status of the ardour3 source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 4.0~dfsg1-1 Current version: 4.1~dfsg-1 Ardour3 version 4.1 Seriously? http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/2015-April/043650.html This exactly. It may not be a big deal (new versions of ardour an load old sessions), but for a bit-exact re-export of older sessions, some users may want to keep old Ardour2 and Ardour3 versions around. i don't think we should cater for such an edge case. if a user insists on using ardour2 on (say) Debian/buster, they can download the source from the archives and build it themselves. (probably a better solution would be to have a virtual machine running Debian/wheezy, as the ecosystem is changing as well). Agreed. I'm pretty swamped with work. I might have time on August 8 to work on it, but no guarantees. Mira, are you really out for seven weeks or was this a typo and you meant to write days instead? :) Feel free to move things around whenever you find time. Cheers ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Bug#792619: transition: ffmpeg
Hi Jonathan, On 18.07.2015 12:50, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Control: tag -1 confirmed On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 10:08:10PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: A ben file can be found at the end of the mail. Please set up a transition tracker and let me know, when the upload to unstable can happen. (The command line tools transition is not required to happen in lock step, because the transitional package libav-tools-links can satisfy the dependencies, until the packages are updated.) Please go ahead. It has been uploaded and built on most architectures (still Needs-Build on mips and s390x). When you schedule the binNMUs, please also include bs1770gain, kodi and mlt, even though they are already built against ffmpeg. The new version has gained a libavcodec-extra flavor, so they should pick up the alternative dependency on libavcodec-ffmpeg-extra56. As the transition is now ongoing, I've changed the severity of #790356 (gst-libav1.0) to serious and filed #793015 for taoframework. Best regards, Andreas ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
A VOTRE ATTENTION
Bonjour bien aimé Mon nom est Mr Williams Vanderbilt , j'ai 81 ans,Je suis désoler de vous contactez de cette manière mais le temps ne me laisse pas le choix car j'ai pas longtemps à vivre. Je sais que mon message va vous paraître quelque peu insolite, mais ayez confiance car je suis une personne honnête. Je voudrais que vous y prêtiez une attention particulière car le grand Humaniste Raoul Follereau nous a enseigné que « nul n’a le droit d’être Heureux tout seul » Je suis de nationalité Canadienne. J’ai résidé il y a quelques Temps en Afrique comme en (Ghana, Sénégal ) suite à des affaires florissantes que j’ai des entreprises dans le domaine agricole et dans le textile et J'ai même une société de fabrications de caoutchouc. Ce qui m’a permis de bénéficier d’importants fonds évalués à ce jour à la somme de (800 Milles euros). Je suis actuellement en observation dans une clinique au Canada (BAS Saint-Laurent) d’où je vous écris ce message. Je souffre malheureusement d’un terrible cancer à la Gorge qui est en Phase terminale, c'est à dire que je suis condamné à une mort sûre et Certaine. les médecins traitants m'ont informés que mes jours sont comptés du fait de mon état de santé dégradé. Or ma situation est telle que je suis veuf ni de femme et ni d'enfant et aussi même pas de parent auprès de moi car les est tous perdus. C’est pour cela que je recherche un ami(e) qui voudrais de façon gracieuse et dans le souci d’aider les démunis, vous léguer ces fonds afin et vous permettre d’édifier une Fondation qui portera mon nom. Je vous prie de bien vouloir accepter cette offre pour ne pas que mes Avoirs Deviennent systématiquement la propriété du gouvernement de certains pays africains comme (Ghana,Sénégal ) . Dès réception du message, je vous prie de bien vouloir me répondre à cette adresse Email de toute urgence avec vos coordonnés pour me permettre de vous mettre en contact avec le Notaire qui s’occupera de la procédure de cette œuvre lucrative et du transfert des fonds auprès de vous. Je compte dès lors sur votre promptitude et surtout je vous demande de faire un bon usage de ces fonds quand ils vous seront transférés et mis à votre Disposition. Que Dieu Vous Bénisse et qu'il vous donne longue vie sur cette terre des hommes. je suis en attente de votre message de ma part merci de bien vouloir me répondre à mon émail que je vous est remis pour plus d'information sur ma vie. Cordialement Williams Vanderbilt___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
ffms2 2.21-4 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the ffms2 source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2.21-2 Current version: 2.21-4 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processed: [bts-link] source package mpv
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # # bts-link upstream status pull for source package mpv # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org (was bts-link-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org). # remote status report for #779789 (http://bugs.debian.org/779789) # Bug title: mpv: free(): invalid pointer: 0xedf28020 *** # * https://github.com/mpv-player/mpv/issues/1698 # * remote status changed: open - closed # * closed upstream tags 779789 + fixed-upstream Bug #779789 [mpv] mpv: free(): invalid pointer: 0xedf28020 *** Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. usertags 779789 - status-open Usertags were: status-open. Usertags are now: . usertags 779789 + status-closed There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: status-closed. # remote status report for #790446 (http://bugs.debian.org/790446) # Bug title: mpv: Warning about mismatch between build and run-time ffmpeg libraries # * https://github.com/mpv-player/mpv/issues/2110 # * remote status changed: open - closed usertags 790446 - status-open Usertags were: status-open. Usertags are now: . usertags 790446 + status-closed There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: status-closed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 779789: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=779789 790446: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790446 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processed: [bts-link] source package src:kodi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:kodi # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org (was bts-link-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org). # remote status report for #792299 (http://bugs.debian.org/792299) # Bug title: kodi: CVE-2015-3885 # * https://github.com/xbmc/xbmc/pull/7141 # * remote status changed: (?) - closed # * closed upstream tags 792299 + fixed-upstream Bug #792299 [src:kodi] kodi: CVE-2015-3885 Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. usertags 792299 + status-closed There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: status-closed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 792299: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=792299 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: return of the mpalyer package?!
My understanding was that Robbie attempted to go through the procedure to join the team but that there was some miscommunication so no progress happened. He did ask, http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/2015-March/043292.html Hopefully someone with admin right in the group can help to add him if he is still interested and there are no objections. As a followup to this. Robbie please tell me if you are still interested in joining the team so you can be added in Alioth. Cheers, Miguel ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: return of the mpalyer package?!
Miguel A. Colón Vélez debian.mic...@gmail.com writes: My understanding was that Robbie attempted to go through the procedure to join the team but that there was some miscommunication so no progress happened. He did ask, http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/2015-March/043292.html Hopefully someone with admin right in the group can help to add him if he is still interested and there are no objections. As a followup to this. Robbie please tell me if you are still interested in joining the team so you can be added in Alioth. Hi. Apologies for the delay; I needed some time so that I could be sure my reply was levelheaded. As frustrating as I'm sure this has been for you, it has been no less for me. Yes, I'm still interested in joining the team. The most important thing to me here is that mplayer be available in debian and that there be support behind it. Toward that end, I believe I can contribute. Regarding process, I have a couple grievances I want to air. 1. I did *not* know that anything was being worked on, and I apologize for the duplicate effort. I tried (several times, actually) to contact you, and I received no reply either on IRC (which is how you contacted me) or to my mail to the list (which is what your wiki says I'm supposed to do to join the team). Therefore, I assumed that there was no work being done, since you had offered cooperation. It saddens me that the default response is to declare me hostile rather than out of the loop. 2. Further, there has been an RFE/ITP bug open for mplayer+mencoder since date -d 'Fri, 03 Oct 2014 01:08:23 +0200'. It is number 763826. This is my first attempt at maintaining a package and I am not overly familiar with the process, but my understanding is that the workflow goes RFE-ITP-package upload, in rough terms. I announced intent to package (and set bug status as such) on date -d 'Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:58:51 -0500'. It has not changed since. Again, I am new, but it is VERY surprising to me that one could expect to upload a package without owning the ITP. It is especially irritating for this to be dubbed a hijack, as to me it feels the opposite. All that being said: yes, I'm still interested in seeing this through. --Robbie signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
