Bug#724958: gmusicbrowser: New upstream version
On 09/29/2013 07:07 PM, Jonathan McCrohan wrote: Package: gmusicbrowser Version: 1.1.9-2 Severity: wishlist Hi, gmusicbrowser 1.1.10 has been available for a couple of months now. I see that initial work on this release is in the VCS. It would be great if this work could be finished and a new package uploaded to Debian. Thanks, Jon I actually have the fixes for this in Ubuntu, I just need to commit them to the VCS and request uploading. I'll try to get to that soon. Thanks, Micah ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#717779: npapi-vlc: Missing build dependency
Package: npapi-vlc Version: 2.0.6-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu saucy ubuntu-patch libx11-xcb-dev is needed to build for x11-xcb.pc, in Debian this is pulled in through other dependencies, but it isn't in Ubuntu. As it's currently not FTBFS due to an implementation detail in Debian, I've marked this as important. Thanks! *** /tmp/tmpz7djGa/bug_body In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following: * Add libx11-xcb-dev to build dependencies to fix FTBFS - update debian/control Thanks for considering the patch. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers precise-updates APT policy: (500, 'precise-updates'), (500, 'precise-security'), (500, 'precise-proposed'), (500, 'precise'), (100, 'precise-backports') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-39-generic (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash diff -Nru npapi-vlc-2.0.6/debian/changelog npapi-vlc-2.0.6/debian/changelog diff -Nru npapi-vlc-2.0.6/debian/control npapi-vlc-2.0.6/debian/control --- npapi-vlc-2.0.6/debian/control 2013-06-24 16:42:25.0 -0500 +++ npapi-vlc-2.0.6/debian/control 2013-07-24 21:04:55.0 -0500 @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ dh-autoreconf, libgtk2.0-dev, libvlc-dev (= 1.1.0), + libx11-xcb-dev, xulrunner-dev (= 1.9.1) | firefox-dev (= 4.0) Standards-Version: 3.9.4 Homepage: http://www.videolan.org/vlc/ ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#698750: morituri: Has a binary dependency on python-musicbrainzngs not in the Debian archive
Package: morituri Version: 0.1.3-2 Severity: important 0.1.3-2 introduced a binary dependency on python-musicbrainzngs (= 0.2-1.1~) which isn't in sid or experimental -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers precise-updates APT policy: (500, 'precise-updates'), (500, 'precise-security'), (500, 'precise-proposed'), (500, 'precise'), (100, 'precise-backports') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-35-generic (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#682948: Incorrect versioning scheme disturbs upgrading
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 severity 682948 wishlist thanks On 07/27/2012 09:12 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On 12-07-27 at 10:02pm, IRIE Shinsuke wrote: I forgot to say that actually there were official deb packages using +cvs suffix in the past (ex. 2.25b+cvs.2003.02.17-1). So, +svn suffix might be used for the future versions of the official packages. I mean the versioning scheme like 2.63.1 is generally necessary, not only for my PPA's packages. I do not find it necessary for Debian to follow a naming scheme used in Ubuntu, just as upstream should not worry about Debian when they choose a naming scheme. Ubuntu developers are strongly encouraged to help maintain packages in Debian as a better alternative to try second-guess future naming of Debian packages. When Ubuntu introduces packages in their repos that does not exist in Debian, there is a real risk of diverging from Debian. It only makes sense to me to treat Debian as upstream to Ubuntu - not the opposite. This is not an Ubuntu issue, but a PPA issue. Ubuntu at the moment syncs blender unchanged from Debian. So, I'm reducing this to severity wishlist as it doesn't affect an official archive. I'll leave it to Jonas to mark wontfix if he feels it's appropriate as I don't actively work on this. I'd suggest using the next release with a ~vcs suffix, so if there's a 2.63, do a 2.63a~svn upload. Also, this is only an issue for the release without a letter. AIUI, the version scheme has always been to follow upstream except in the case where upgrades would break. Since the +dfsg suffix is not needed anymore, the official packages no longer have an issue. I'd suggest you adjust your scripts to handle the upstream versioning appropriately. Thanks, MIcah -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlASrH8ACgkQTniv4aqX/VkWSQCghtfIZG8XfYV413xbZfRLpPRe yH0AoIj1ZHF05PfBHw/UhhLLZWsZFehF =Y1B4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#674177: advene: recommends firefox
On 05/23/2012 10:47 AM, A. N. Other wrote: advene currently recommends firefox; shouldn't this be iceweasel? Could we do iceweasel | firefox please? ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#658084: libav-extra: Really necessary?
On 03/21/2012 06:40 AM, Andres Mejia wrote: On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote: Do you volunteer to do at least the first uploads for libav and libav-extra for ubuntu as well? Yes, I'll volunteer, but the first thing I would do for ubuntu is a) request libav to be demoted back to universe or b) request all of libav's build dependencies to be promoted to main. You think any of these requests would succeed? libav can be demoted next cycle when KDE gets demoted to universe. Micah ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#658084: libav-extra: Really necessary?
On 03/21/2012 05:58 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: Could anyone from the team please upload 0.8.1 to precise for me before the freeze? Thanks in advance! I think with the changes made to the version in 4:0.8.1-1, a merge would need an FFe if we're going to keep everything that Debian has enabled. Micah ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#658084: libav-extra: Really necessary?
On 03/21/2012 06:34 PM, Andres Mejia wrote: On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com wrote: On Mar 21, 2012 4:40 PM, Micah Gersten mic...@ubuntu.com wrote: On 03/21/2012 06:40 AM, Andres Mejia wrote: On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote: Do you volunteer to do at least the first uploads for libav and libav-extra for ubuntu as well? Yes, I'll volunteer, but the first thing I would do for ubuntu is a) request libav to be demoted back to universe or b) request all of libav's build dependencies to be promoted to main. You think any of these requests would succeed? libav can be demoted next cycle when KDE gets demoted to universe. Micah Great thanks. Reinhard, did you wanted 0.8.1 in precise? Betafreeze is tomorrow. Thanks for the notice, yes I did, and unfortunately, I'm travelling and won't be at home before friday. Could anyone from the team please upload 0.8.1 to precise for me before the freeze? Thanks in advance! -- regards, Reinhard I'm not an Ubuntu developer I'm afraid. At best I could have something ready for someone to review and sponsor for an upload to Ubuntu. We could always ask for a freeze exception. After all, this new release brings a lot of security fixes. Would anyone mind if I just used the new upstream version without merging? Does precise need any of the other changes made recently? ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Audacity 2.0 and Ubuntu 11.10
On 03/16/2012 08:09 AM, Janne Jokitalo wrote: On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:17:19PM -0500, Micah Gersten wrote: On 03/15/2012 12:01 PM, lopez3...@safe-mail.net wrote: Hello I am using Audacity on an Ubuntu 11.10 system. Presently, the latest version available through the software repositories is 1.3.14. Now that Audacity 2.0 has been released, could you ensure it is available through the repositories as well? This will make installation of the latest stable version *much* easier for people like me who find compiling from source difficult. My thanks to the entire debian/ubuntu multimedia team. :-) (http://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Release_Notes_2.0.0) Sure, I can do this through oneiric-backports if you or someone else is willing to install/run the test packages to make sure they work. Hi all, Micah, I'd be interested in running the test packages on oneiric. Thanks, Jaska (aka astraljava @ irc.[freenode|oftc].net) I'll file the bug, upload test packages, and subscribe you then. Thanks, Micah ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Audacity 2.0 and Ubuntu 11.10
On 03/15/2012 12:01 PM, lopez3...@safe-mail.net wrote: Hello I am using Audacity on an Ubuntu 11.10 system. Presently, the latest version available through the software repositories is 1.3.14. Now that Audacity 2.0 has been released, could you ensure it is available through the repositories as well? This will make installation of the latest stable version *much* easier for people like me who find compiling from source difficult. My thanks to the entire debian/ubuntu multimedia team. :-) (http://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Release_Notes_2.0.0) Sure, I can do this through oneiric-backports if you or someone else is willing to install/run the test packages to make sure they work. Thanks, Micah ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#656850: MPlayer recommends libbluray1 which in turn recommends libbluray-bdj which requires JRE so the default mplayer install brings java bloat to the system
retitle 656850 libbluray1 recommends libbluray-bdj which requires JRE and brings java bloat to the system stop This is also bringing in java for vlc installs. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#652822: lives: Please add build dependency on libxv-dev
Package: lives Version: 1.4.8-1 Severity: normal Tags: patch User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu precise ubuntu-patch This is required to build, but not necessarily pulled in. *** /tmp/tmpgTgTcW/bug_body In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following: * Add libxv-dev to Build-depends; Seems to be missing in the Ubuntu dependency chain - update debian/control Thanks for considering the patch. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers oneiric-updates APT policy: (500, 'oneiric-updates'), (500, 'oneiric-security'), (500, 'oneiric-proposed'), (500, 'oneiric'), (100, 'oneiric-backports') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-13-generic (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash diff -Nru lives-1.4.8/debian/changelog lives-1.4.8/debian/changelog diff -Nru lives-1.4.8/debian/control lives-1.4.8/debian/control --- lives-1.4.8/debian/control 2011-12-03 06:40:07.0 -0600 +++ lives-1.4.8/debian/control 2011-12-20 02:45:09.0 -0600 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ Source: lives Section: video Priority: optional Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Uploaders: Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org, Harry Rickards hricka...@l33tmyst.com @@ -34,6 +35,7 @@ libunicap2-dev [linux-any], libv4l-dev [linux-any], libvorbis-dev, + libxv-dev, python-all (= 2.6.6-3~), xutils-dev DM-Upload-Allowed: yes ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: src:ecasound / src:ecasound2.2
On 09/14/2011 05:35 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: What's the difference? Should ecasound2.2 be RMed? From the Ubuntu side this would be great as with the 2.8 upload, ecasound2.2 retook the ecasound source package. This is causing the ecasound2.2 binaries to fail to upload since they're superseded. Thanks, Micah ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Fwd: mplayer2 is a very poor fork name used to confuse users.
For the benefit of those not on debian-devel Original Message Subject:mplayer2 is a very poor fork name used to confuse users. Resent-Date:Fri, 19 Aug 2011 04:12:08 + (UTC) Resent-From:debian-de...@lists.debian.org Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:56:41 -0400 From: compn te...@twmi.rr.com To: mplayer-dev-...@mplayerhq.hu CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org mplayer2 is a very poor fork name used to confuse users. it doesnt help that debian is using that name as a package: http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mplayer/news/20110817T173341Z.html debian and uoti are setting themselves (and us) up for explaining to users which version is better. why each version is better. which version they are using when reporting bugs. why 'we dont have mencoder anymore?' 'why isnt gmplayer installed with mplayer2?' etc maybe i'll just go create the debian2 operating system or the google2 search engine. brilliant! -compn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110818235641.e2951c46.te...@twmi.rr.com ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] csound/master: Add missing #include cstddef to prevent FTBFS with GCC4.6 (Closes: #624982, LP: #771134).
On 08/05/2011 11:57 AM, Alessio Treglia wrote: csound still fails to build in Ubuntu Oneiric anyway: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/76090124/buildlog_ubuntu-oneiric-amd64.csound_1%3A5.13.0~dfsg-4_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz I just uploaded a fix for this. Ubuntu hasn't transitioned to swig 2.0, so I changed the build-dep from swig to swig2.0 and it built fine. This change can be dropped when P opens. No need to change anything in Debian AFAIK. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu//+source/csound/1:5.13.0~dfsg-4ubuntu1 Thanks, Micah ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] csound/master: Add missing #include cstddef to prevent FTBFS with GCC4.6 (Closes: #624982, LP: #771134).
On 08/05/2011 01:23 PM, Micah Gersten wrote: On 08/05/2011 11:57 AM, Alessio Treglia wrote: csound still fails to build in Ubuntu Oneiric anyway: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/76090124/buildlog_ubuntu-oneiric-amd64.csound_1%3A5.13.0~dfsg-4_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz I just uploaded a fix for this. Ubuntu hasn't transitioned to swig 2.0, so I changed the build-dep from swig to swig2.0 and it built fine. This change can be dropped when P opens. No need to change anything in Debian AFAIK. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu//+source/csound/1:5.13.0~dfsg-4ubuntu1 Thanks, Micah Actually, armel failed, but that's due to something else: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/76674462/buildlog_ubuntu-oneiric-armel.csound_1%3A5.13.0~dfsg-4ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz Micah ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Debian's mediatomb package is in bad shape
On 07/10/2011 06:15 AM, Arnout Engelen wrote: On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:29:03AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: I notice that the mediatomb package in debian is in a rather bad shape. [1] currently lists 3 RC and 5 important bugs. Moreover, there hasn't been a new upstream release for over a year. I know that I did the last upload of the package, but since I don't really use it, getting the package in shape is not really my priority. For the team, I ask you what to do about it. Do we have volunteers to get it in shape or shall we rather orphan/remove it from Debian? Afaics mediatomb is currently the only UPnP/DLNA server in Debian with transcoding capabilities. I think we should either try to keep mediatomb or package another similar piece of software - I don't know which are any good though :). I have an interest in this kind of software (as I recently got a TV with DLNA capabilities ;) ), so I might be able to help out here and there, but I don't have much experience with it yet. Kind regards, Arnout Arnout, since you have an interest, would you be willing to maintain this with me under the banner of pkg-multimedia? (AFAIK, the requirement is that 2 members of the team agree to maintain it, are named as Uploaders in debian/control, and the package relates to multimedia). Unfortunately, I don't use the package, but have an interest in it as far as there appear to be quite a few users in Ubuntu using it. Thanks, Micah ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Debian's mediatomb package is in bad shape
On 06/24/2011 09:29 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: Hi, I've CC'ed both Sven and Leonard explicitly, because both do not seem to be subscribed to pkg-multimedia. Sven, Leonard, are you (still?) interested in participating in pkg-multimedia [2]? I notice that the mediatomb package in debian is in a rather bad shape. [1] currently lists 3 RC and 5 important bugs. Moreover, there hasn't been a new upstream release for over a year. I know that I did the last upload of the package, but since I don't really use it, getting the package in shape is not really my priority. For the team, I ask you what to do about it. Do we have volunteers to get it in shape or shall we rather orphan/remove it from Debian? [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=mediatomb;dist=unstable [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/Join I have an interest as far as there seem to be users in Ubuntu for the package. I'm still catching up on various tasks, but I can try to take this over (would still like to keep it under pkg-multimedia if that's ok). The problem is that I don't personally use it. Micah ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] gmusicbrowser packaging annotated tag, upstream/1.1.7, created. upstream/1.1.7
Apologies for accidentally sending this to the commits ML. On 03/20/2011 03:39 AM, ales...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: The annotated tag, upstream/1.1.7 has been created at 119fdb2c621b325e573db79f76c0100f04b2c609 (tag) tagging 551d436ea62d306130a6f13d2fa89e4a33101a9c (commit) replaces upstream/1.1.6 tagged by Alessio Treglia on Sun Mar 20 09:35:52 2011 +0100 - Shortlog Upstream version 1.1.7 Alessio Treglia (1): Imported Upstream version 1.1.7 --- Would it be possible to get 1.1.7 uploaded? I'd like to sync this to Ubuntu with some Xubuntu specific patches (I'll add back the ones I think are appropriate for Debian) before Beta Freeze on Thursday. Thanks, Micah ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] gmusicbrowser packaging annotated tag, upstream/1.1.7, created. upstream/1.1.7
On 03/21/2011 05:28 AM, Alessio Treglia wrote: On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Micah Gersten mic...@ubuntu.com wrote: Would it be possible to get 1.1.7 uploaded? Done. Regards, Thanks! ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Csound on Ubuntu
On 03/06/2011 05:10 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 17:12, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote: On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 18:39, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 03:52:15PM +, Felipe Sateler wrote: OK, the problem seems to be -as-needed. Compiling with -no-as-needed results in a correct binary (only in Ubuntu, Debian binaries are OK even with -as-needed). Why does this fail in Ubuntu but not in Debian? Any ideas? Ubuntu set aggressive default compile flags, whereas Debian set conservative ones. I know that, I wanted to know if somebody had more detail. OK, I found the problem. In Ubuntu, scons is for some reason inserting -fvisibility=hidden to the gcc/g++ lines, thus crippling the CsoundAC library. The scons in debian shows no such problem. The ubuntu people here, how can I get Ubuntu to pick the latest version from debian, and then rebuild csound using that? There are 61 build-depends on scons in Ubuntu and we're past feature freeze. Aside from that, are you sure it's scons and not the toolchain that's diifferent? Micah ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Bug#615033: ITP: gnome-web-photo -- Create snapshot images of and print web pages from the command line
On 02/25/2011 10:55 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 10:29:49AM -0600, Micah Gersten wrote: On 02/24/2011 09:42 PM, Micah Gersten wrote: Description : Create snapshot images of and print web pages from the command line GNOME Web Photographer is a tool to generate full-size image files and thumbnails from HTML files and web pages. It can also be used to print those. Is anyone willing to be an uploader with me on this package? I fail to see how it relates to Multimedia. - Jonas I was thinking since it has image manipulation that it might fall under multimedia, is there another team better suited for this? Thanks, Micah ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Bug#615033: ITP: gnome-web-photo -- Create snapshot images of and print web pages from the command line
On 02/24/2011 09:42 PM, Micah Gersten wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Micah Gersten mic...@ubuntu.com * Package name: gnome-web-photo Version : 0.10 Upstream Author : Christian Persch c...@gnome.org, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org * URL : http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-web-photo * License : LGPL 2.1 or later Programming Lang: (C) Description : Create snapshot images of and print web pages from the command line GNOME Web Photographer is a tool to generate full-size image files and thumbnails from HTML files and web pages. It can also be used to print those. Is anyone willing to be an uploader with me on this package? Thanks, Micah ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Request for review/sponsorship for gmusicbrowser
On 02/23/2011 12:02 AM, Micah Gersten wrote: On 02/22/2011 11:36 PM, Alessio Treglia wrote: On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Micah Gersten mic...@ubuntu.com wrote: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/gmusicbrowser.git Update to 1.1.6 I'd like to get this sync'd to Ubuntu in the next 24 hours. Please don't, the 1.1.6 release is a development version which needs testing. Cheers, Xubuntu wants this as the default music player and are happy with the current version. I have been assured by people working with it that the release is fairly stable. There are additional polish patches coming in the next few weeks, but I wanted to at least get the feature complete version in before Feature Freeze. Micah Could you at least put this in experimental? Thanks, Micah ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Request for review/sponsorship for gmusicbrowser
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/gmusicbrowser.git Update to 1.1.6 I'd like to get this sync'd to Ubuntu in the next 24 hours. Thanks, Micah ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Request for review/sponsorship for gmusicbrowser
On 02/22/2011 11:36 PM, Alessio Treglia wrote: On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Micah Gersten mic...@ubuntu.com wrote: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/gmusicbrowser.git Update to 1.1.6 I'd like to get this sync'd to Ubuntu in the next 24 hours. Please don't, the 1.1.6 release is a development version which needs testing. Cheers, Xubuntu wants this as the default music player and are happy with the current version. I have been assured by people working with it that the release is fairly stable. There are additional polish patches coming in the next few weeks, but I wanted to at least get the feature complete version in before Feature Freeze. Micah ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] milkytracker/master: Add remove-bundled-zziplib-and-zlib patch
On 12/28/2010 03:13 PM, ghedo-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit dcd13ad891c1299bc49e7718c1f49a6a876391ea Author: Alessandro Ghedini al3x...@gmail.com Date: Tue Dec 28 21:01:11 2010 +0100 Add remove-bundled-zziplib-and-zlib patch diff --git a/debian/patches/0002-remove-bundled-zziplib-and-zlib.patch b/debian/patches/0002-remove-bundled-zziplib-and-zlib.patch new file mode 100644 index 000..b068ac2 --- /dev/null +++ b/debian/patches/0002-remove-bundled-zziplib-and-zlib.patch @@ -0,0 +1,16755 @@ +From: Alessandro Ghedini al3x...@gmail.com +Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 19:08:16 +0100 +Subject: [PATCH] remove bundled zziplib and zlib + +Remove the sources of zziplib and zlib, and update sources to use libzzip +from Debian +--- + src/compression/Makefile.am | 6 +- + src/compression/Makefile.in | 314 + + src/compression/ZipExtractor.cpp | 2 +- + src/compression/zlib/generic/adler32.cpp | 143 -- + src/compression/zlib/generic/compress.cpp | 69 - + src/compression/zlib/generic/crc32.cpp | 407 - + src/compression/zlib/generic/crc32.h | 441 -- + src/compression/zlib/generic/deflate.cpp | 1729 -- + src/compression/zlib/generic/deflate.h | 331 - + src/compression/zlib/generic/infback.cpp | 621 + src/compression/zlib/generic/inffast.cpp | 317 + src/compression/zlib/generic/inffast.h | 11 - + src/compression/zlib/generic/inffixed.h | 94 -- + src/compression/zlib/generic/inflate.cpp | 1363 - + src/compression/zlib/generic/inflate.h | 115 -- + src/compression/zlib/generic/inftrees.cpp | 329 + src/compression/zlib/generic/inftrees.h | 55 - + src/compression/zlib/generic/trees.cpp | 1212 --- + src/compression/zlib/generic/trees.h | 128 -- + src/compression/zlib/generic/uncompr.cpp | 61 - + src/compression/zlib/generic/zconf.h | 332 - + src/compression/zlib/generic/zlib.h | 1357 - + src/compression/zlib/generic/zutil.cpp | 317 + src/compression/zlib/generic/zutil.h | 269 + src/compression/zziplib/MyIO.h | 4 +- + src/compression/zziplib/generic/dir.cpp | 296 + src/compression/zziplib/generic/err.cpp | 156 -- + src/compression/zziplib/generic/fetch.cpp | 117 -- + src/compression/zziplib/generic/file.cpp | 1029 - + src/compression/zziplib/generic/fseeko.cpp | 584 + src/compression/zziplib/generic/info.cpp | 161 -- + src/compression/zziplib/generic/plugin.cpp | 86 -- + src/compression/zziplib/generic/stat.cpp | 119 -- + src/compression/zziplib/generic/zip.cpp | 759 -- + src/compression/zziplib/generic/zzip.h | 323 + src/compression/zziplib/generic/zzip___debug.h | 89 -- + src/compression/zziplib/generic/zzip___dirent.h | 393 - + src/compression/zziplib/generic/zzip___fnmatch.h | 28 - + src/compression/zziplib/generic/zzip___hints.h | 189 --- + src/compression/zziplib/generic/zzip___mmap.h | 107 -- + src/compression/zziplib/generic/zzip__config.h | 238 --- + src/compression/zziplib/generic/zzip__msvc.h | 211 --- + src/compression/zziplib/generic/zzip_autoconf.h | 45 - + src/compression/zziplib/generic/zzip_conf.h | 276 + src/compression/zziplib/generic/zzip_fetch.h | 325 + src/compression/zziplib/generic/zzip_file.h | 81 - + src/compression/zziplib/generic/zzip_format.h | 233 --- + src/compression/zziplib/generic/zzip_fseeko.h | 116 -- + src/compression/zziplib/generic/zzip_info.h | 25 - + src/compression/zziplib/generic/zzip_lib.h | 83 - + src/compression/zziplib/generic/zzip_plugin.h | 96 -- + src/compression/zziplib/generic/zzip_stdint.h | 45 - + src/compression/zziplib/generic/zzip_types.h | 51 - Would it be better to remove these files in the get-orig-source rule? It's already modifying the tarball for DFSG compliance. Micah ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
request to join
Hi! I'm one of the Mozilla maintainers in Ubuntu and also help maintain the xulrunner rdepends of which 2 are part of this team (mediatomb and vlc). I would like to join so that I can help with the packaging work for these products so that both distros benefit from any updates that I do. I have: Created an alioth account Subscribed to both lists I'm familiar with the bts to some extent and would like to help where I can. I can't commit to a lot at this point and I see the vlc is pretty well taken care of, but would like to get mediatomb updated. Thank you, Micah Gersten ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
