Re: Decent DVD rippers?
Am Freitag, den 11.05.2012, 16:10 -0400 schrieb Andres Mejia: Could it use vo-aacenc as an alternate? I've never considered. It's not like vo-aacenc is a drop-in replacement for faac, their APIs appear quite dissimilar (IIRC vo-aacenc is C++ while libfaac is C). It probably makes more sense to replace use of libmp4v2 with libav instead anyway. mp4v2 upstream doesn't look very active IMO and it may serve the handbrake project better to switch to something else. There is still atomicparsley as an alternative. The gtkpod mainatiners have just turned it into a GPL'ed library, cf. http://old.nabble.com/Finally-pushed-alternative-to-libmp4v2-td33723081.html - Fabian ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Decent DVD rippers?
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote: Am Freitag, den 11.05.2012, 16:10 -0400 schrieb Andres Mejia: Could it use vo-aacenc as an alternate? I've never considered. It's not like vo-aacenc is a drop-in replacement for faac, their APIs appear quite dissimilar (IIRC vo-aacenc is C++ while libfaac is C). Yes it's not a drop-in replacement and I believe faac has some features not available in vo-aacenc. I could be mistaken about the features however. It probably makes more sense to replace use of libmp4v2 with libav instead anyway. mp4v2 upstream doesn't look very active IMO and it may serve the handbrake project better to switch to something else. There is still atomicparsley as an alternative. The gtkpod mainatiners have just turned it into a GPL'ed library, cf. http://old.nabble.com/Finally-pushed-alternative-to-libmp4v2-td33723081.html - Fabian Ok, saving this little information about atomicparsley in the ITP bug for handbrake. -- ~ Andres ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Decent DVD rippers?
Late posting but... On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote: Am 01.02.2012 18:19, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: Feel free to push what you currently have to git.debian.org, I might find some time next week to have a closer look. Maybe we can get it to use opencore-aac instead. What I have at the moment is absolutely unrepresentable. It is based on Marillat's package with some changes to patches and some out-of-patch changes. Maybe I'll try to break out my own changes as a separate patch once I got it to compile and post it here. Some observations: - Just as avidemux (or maybe even worse) handbrake downloads static source snapshots of external libraries, patches them and builds static libraries. - It uses lots of deprecated ffmpeg API and even patches its private copy to export a private header. It's only needed for one declaration, so that's easily patched out. - It uses a private copy of libdca and patches it to use different names for its structs, WTF. However, this is also easily solved with a typedef. - It uses libmkv, which is currently not in Debian. I rebuilt the Marilat package for the time being, but this package should be no problem. - It uses an ancient snapshot of libbluray that has a slightly different API than the version in Debian. - It uses faac which is considered non-free and thus not in Debian. Could it use vo-aacenc as an alternate? - Last but not least, it uses libmp4v2. Apart from the fact that there have also been slight APi changes compared to the version in Debian, this library is licensed under the MPL. AFAICT this and the GPL are incompatible, so the resulting software is unredistributable. It probably makes more sense to replace use of libmp4v2 with libav instead anyway. mp4v2 upstream doesn't look very active IMO and it may serve the handbrake project better to switch to something else. If the latter turns out to be true, I see no change for handbrake to enter Debian and thus no sense in working on it anymore. - Fabian ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers -- ~ Andres ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Decent DVD rippers?
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote: BTW2, there is also a nearly-ready transcode 1.1.3 package prepared in git which just needs review of debian/copyright and Build-Depends. This would also enable uploading of a lot of packages that depend on it, e.g. dvd::rip. Cool! I'll try to find time next week to have a look at it. Oh right. Well, obvious TODOs on the package: - file an ITP - update to 1.1.5 - review and integrate ubuntu package - review licensing - upload to unstable - revive/stimulate upstream Not sure when I get to that. probably not this or next week :-( If someone else wants to volunteer, feel free! -- regards, Reinhard ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Decent DVD rippers?
Am 03.02.2012 17:09, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: I've asked debian-legal (with zero response) and then abandoned faac. I've escalated this question to the ubuntu technical board, and they've decided faac was redistributable but non-free. So that wouldn't help us much. No, we are not going to push nearly all of our multimedia applications in contrib. :/ Maybe we can port/replace the offending parts with code from libavcodec? Currently we have three choices: 1) FAAC has a CLI frontend, non-free code in the library and uses mp4v2 (MPL-1.1) for mp4 muxing. 2) vo-aacenc (Apache-2.0) offers a free library, but does not have a CLI and no mp4 muxing code. 3) ffaac (lavc) is free, probably does not offer the best encoding quality, has no own CLI and uses lavf for mp4 muxing. So the best would be to port the FAAC frontend to the vo-aacenc library and use libavformat for mp4 muxing. ;) Cool! I'll try to find time next week to have a look at it. You actually did the last commit in September yourself. :p ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Decent DVD rippers?
Am 03.02.2012 17:28, schrieb Fabrice Coutadeur: A bit off-topic, but I was planning to try to move dvdstyler from Ubuntu to Debian, under Debian Multimedia umbrella, as all dependencies seems to be there (still have to port it to libav 0.8 though). Cooo, that's highly appreciated, thanks! ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Decent DVD rippers?
And another member of our team, Julien Lavergne, already maintains ogmrip in Ubuntu. Julien, would you mind puting the package under pkg-multimedia team maintenance and upload it to Debian as well? Sorry for putting work onto others (or at least suggesting so), but I really think this is the most reasonable way to maintain these packages and also get them into Debian by the way. Most of the prerequisits for these packages are now met in Debian and if the packages are maintained well (which I assume), ubuntu could still pull them as usual. My long-term goal is to make the d-m.o archive obsolete, at least regarding packages that we can legally distribute. ;) - Fabian Am 02.02.2012 11:00, schrieb Fabian Greffrath: Alessio, Am 01.02.2012 11:00, schrieb Fabian Greffrath: There are also some command line tools like xvidenc, h264enc or lxdvdrip which might be easier to package but only provide limited I have seen that you maintain these for ubuntu. Would you mind uploading them to Debian, too? I think all the requirements are met ni Debian nowadays. - Fabian ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Decent DVD rippers?
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote: And another member of our team, Julien Lavergne, already maintains ogmrip in Ubuntu. Julien, would you mind puting the package under pkg-multimedia team maintenance and upload it to Debian as well? Sorry for putting work onto others (or at least suggesting so), but I really think this is the most reasonable way to maintain these packages and also get them into Debian by the way. Most of the prerequisits for these packages are now met in Debian and if the packages are maintained well (which I assume), ubuntu could still pull them as usual. My long-term goal is to make the d-m.o archive obsolete, at least regarding packages that we can legally distribute. ;) Besides, we already do have a number of (official) Ubuntu Developers in pkg-multimedia. Having said this, I think pkg-multimedia is a great oppurtinity for newcomers to get involved into Debian. Regarding h264enc and xvidenc, I had a brief look at them early last year. AFAIR, they are quite sophisticated shell scripts, but otherwise pretty straight forward to maintain. Count me in as supporter for these packages. -- regards, Reinhard ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Decent DVD rippers?
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote: Regarding h264enc and xvidenc, I had a brief look at them early last year. AFAIR, they are quite sophisticated shell scripts, but otherwise pretty straight forward to maintain. Count me in as supporter for these packages. It was my fault to not having check'd the latest updates on the multimedia-related packages available in Ubuntu since I used to maintain them some time ago. I think we should write a small list of multimedia packages currently available in Ubuntu and missing in Debian (but that can join), e.g. xvidenc and h264enc are part of that such of set, even if they have a dependency on gpac, which could be demoted to Suggests. BTW, what's up with gpac? -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer | quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Decent DVD rippers?
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org wrote: I think we should write a small list of multimedia packages currently available in Ubuntu and missing in Debian (but that can join), e.g. xvidenc and h264enc are part of that such of set, even if they have a dependency on gpac, which could be demoted to Suggests. That's a great idea, BTW, what's up with gpac? IIRC, Andres was working on it last. The last problem I remember was that it contained code from the reference mpeg2 encoder, which required license/copyright clarification or having those parts dropped from the package. IIRC, A number of missing packages require gpac. -- regards, Reinhard ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Decent DVD rippers?
Am 03.02.2012 16:16, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: IIRC, Andres was working on it last. The last problem I remember was that it contained code from the reference mpeg2 encoder, which required license/copyright clarification or having those parts dropped from the package. IIRC, A number of missing packages require gpac. Damn, that stupid mpeg license text is nearly the same as in faac. There it turned the whole library non-free and even non-distributable - whereas, that's our interpretation, I am not sure what ftp-masters think about it (did we ever try to upload faac yet?). BTW, I am sorry I started this madness, but let's plase just answer to the list again. BTW2, there is also a nearly-ready transcode 1.1.3 package prepared in git which just needs review of debian/copyright and Build-Depends. This would also enable uploading of a lot of packages that depend on it, e.g. dvd::rip. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Decent DVD rippers?
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote: Am 03.02.2012 16:16, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: IIRC, Andres was working on it last. The last problem I remember was that it contained code from the reference mpeg2 encoder, which required license/copyright clarification or having those parts dropped from the package. IIRC, A number of missing packages require gpac. Damn, that stupid mpeg license text is nearly the same as in faac. There it turned the whole library non-free and even non-distributable - whereas, that's our interpretation, I am not sure what ftp-masters think about it (did we ever try to upload faac yet?). I've asked debian-legal (with zero response) and then abandoned faac. I've escalated this question to the ubuntu technical board, and they've decided faac was redistributable but non-free. So that wouldn't help us much. Maybe we can port/replace the offending parts with code from libavcodec? BTW, I am sorry I started this madness, but let's plase just answer to the list again. No worries. BTW2, there is also a nearly-ready transcode 1.1.3 package prepared in git which just needs review of debian/copyright and Build-Depends. This would also enable uploading of a lot of packages that depend on it, e.g. dvd::rip. Cool! I'll try to find time next week to have a look at it. -- regards, Reinhard ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Decent DVD rippers?
Hi, A bit off-topic, but I was planning to try to move dvdstyler from Ubuntu to Debian, under Debian Multimedia umbrella, as all dependencies seems to be there (still have to port it to libav 0.8 though). I'll try as soon as I end the update of dvbcut qt4 patch (I have a working version, but lost the icons :-): I hope to end it this week end). Fabrice 2012/2/3 Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com: On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote: Am 03.02.2012 16:16, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: IIRC, Andres was working on it last. The last problem I remember was that it contained code from the reference mpeg2 encoder, which required license/copyright clarification or having those parts dropped from the package. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Decent DVD rippers?
Am 01.02.2012 18:19, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: Feel free to push what you currently have to git.debian.org, I might find some time next week to have a closer look. Maybe we can get it to use opencore-aac instead. What I have at the moment is absolutely unrepresentable. It is based on Marillat's package with some changes to patches and some out-of-patch changes. Maybe I'll try to break out my own changes as a separate patch once I got it to compile and post it here. Some observations: - Just as avidemux (or maybe even worse) handbrake downloads static source snapshots of external libraries, patches them and builds static libraries. - It uses lots of deprecated ffmpeg API and even patches its private copy to export a private header. It's only needed for one declaration, so that's easily patched out. - It uses a private copy of libdca and patches it to use different names for its structs, WTF. However, this is also easily solved with a typedef. - It uses libmkv, which is currently not in Debian. I rebuilt the Marilat package for the time being, but this package should be no problem. - It uses an ancient snapshot of libbluray that has a slightly different API than the version in Debian. - It uses faac which is considered non-free and thus not in Debian. - Last but not least, it uses libmp4v2. Apart from the fact that there have also been slight APi changes compared to the version in Debian, this library is licensed under the MPL. AFAICT this and the GPL are incompatible, so the resulting software is unredistributable. If the latter turns out to be true, I see no change for handbrake to enter Debian and thus no sense in working on it anymore. - Fabian ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Decent DVD rippers?
Am 02.02.2012 10:03, schrieb Fabian Greffrath:
What I have at the moment is absolutely unrepresentable. It is based
on Marillat's package with some changes to patches and some
out-of-patch changes. Maybe I'll try to break out my own changes as a
separate patch once I got it to compile and post it here.
Well, I've got the libhb library to compile, but it fails when linking
in the test phase with unresolved symbols in libdvdnav (and who knows
where else). This missing additional API is patched into the
downloaded copy! However, libdvdnav is only the first library in the
linking chain which fails, but I expect others to follow and thus stop
my work here.
Please find attached a patch with the steps I have so far taken to get
it to compile and take the following as an inspiration about what is
going on here:
$ find contrib/ -name \*.patch
contrib/a52dec/A00-dpl2.patch
contrib/libass/A00-configure.patch
contrib/fontconfig/A00-mingw-disableShared.patch
contrib/faac/P00-cygwin.patch
contrib/faac/A00-bitrates.patch
contrib/mp4v2/A00-nero-vobsub.patch
contrib/mp4v2/P00-mingw-dllimport.patch
contrib/pthreadw32/P00-mingw-w64.patch
contrib/x264/P01-solaris.patch
contrib/lame/P00-darwin-xmmintrin.patch
contrib/libmkv/P00-mingw-large-file.patch
contrib/libdvdread/A02-msc_ver-defs.patch
contrib/libdvdread/A03-m4-uid0.patch
contrib/libdvdread/P00-mingw-dlfcn.patch
contrib/libdvdread/P06-darwin.patch
contrib/libdvdread/A04-dup-lut-pgc.patch
contrib/libdvdread/P05-mingw-large-file.patch
contrib/libdvdread/A00-volume-name.patch
contrib/faad2/P00-solaris.patch
contrib/faad2/P00-mingw-types.patch
contrib/ffmpeg/A03-png-sequences.patch
contrib/ffmpeg/A05-avi-seek.patch
contrib/ffmpeg/A01-mpegleak.patch
contrib/ffmpeg/P02-darwin-pic.patch
contrib/ffmpeg/P03-mingw-gnu99.patch
contrib/ffmpeg/A02-audioconvert.patch
contrib/ffmpeg/P01-solaris.patch
contrib/ffmpeg/A06-kfreebsd.patch
contrib/libdvdnav/A01-program-info.patch
contrib/libdvdnav/A03-quiet.patch
contrib/libdvdnav/A02-mult-pgc.patch
contrib/libdvdnav/A06-reset-mutex.patch
contrib/libdvdnav/A04-m4-uid0.patch
contrib/libdvdnav/A05-forward-seek.patch
contrib/libdvdnav/A07-missing-menu.patch
contrib/libdvdnav/A00-log-stderr.patch
contrib/libdvdnav/P00-mingw-no-examples.patch
contrib/libdvdnav/A08-dvdnav-dup.patch
contrib/libdca/A00-general.patch
contrib/mpeg2dec/A00-tags.patch
contrib/mpeg2dec/A01-gcc4.6.patch
contrib/libvorbis/A00-disable-examples.patch
contrib/libvorbis/A01-docs.patch
- Fabian
--- handbrake-0.9.5.orig/libhb/stream.c
+++ handbrake-0.9.5/libhb/stream.c
@@ -2956,7 +2956,7 @@
int i;
for (i = 0; i ic-nb_streams; ++i )
{
-if ( ic-streams[i]-codec-codec_type == CODEC_TYPE_VIDEO )
+if ( ic-streams[i]-codec-codec_type == AVMEDIA_TYPE_VIDEO )
{
break;
}
@@ -3285,7 +3285,7 @@
int i;
for (i = 0; i ic-nb_streams; ++i )
{
-if ( ic-streams[i]-codec-codec_type == CODEC_TYPE_VIDEO
+if ( ic-streams[i]-codec-codec_type == AVMEDIA_TYPE_VIDEO
avcodec_find_decoder( ic-streams[i]-codec-codec_id )
title-video_codec == 0 )
{
@@ -3306,16 +3306,16 @@
title-video_codec = WORK_DECAVCODECVI;
title-video_codec_param = ffmpeg_codec_param( stream, i );
}
-else if ( ic-streams[i]-codec-codec_type == CODEC_TYPE_AUDIO
+else if ( ic-streams[i]-codec-codec_type == AVMEDIA_TYPE_AUDIO
avcodec_find_decoder( ic-streams[i]-codec-codec_id ) )
{
add_ffmpeg_audio( title, stream, i );
}
-else if ( ic-streams[i]-codec-codec_type == CODEC_TYPE_SUBTITLE )
+else if ( ic-streams[i]-codec-codec_type == AVMEDIA_TYPE_SUBTITLE )
{
add_ffmpeg_subtitle( title, stream, i );
}
-else if ( ic-streams[i]-codec-codec_type == CODEC_TYPE_ATTACHMENT )
+else if ( ic-streams[i]-codec-codec_type == AVMEDIA_TYPE_ATTACHMENT )
{
add_ffmpeg_attachment( title, stream, i );
}
@@ -3423,7 +3423,7 @@
default:
break;
}
-return ( stream-ffmpeg_pkt-flags PKT_FLAG_KEY );
+return ( stream-ffmpeg_pkt-flags AV_PKT_FLAG_KEY );
}
static int ffmpeg_read( hb_stream_t *stream, hb_buffer_t *buf )
@@ -3441,7 +3441,7 @@
// XXX the following conditional is to handle avi files that
// use M$ 'packed b-frames' and occasionally have negative
// sizes for the null frames these require.
-if ( err != AVERROR_NOMEM || stream-ffmpeg_pkt-size = 0 )
+if ( err != AVERROR(ENOMEM) || stream-ffmpeg_pkt-size = 0 )
// eof
return 0;
}
--- handbrake-0.9.5.orig/libhb/decdca.c
+++ handbrake-0.9.5/libhb/decdca.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
#include hb.h
#include dca.h
+typedef sample_t dca_sample_t;
struct hb_work_private_s
{
--- handbrake-0.9.5.orig/libhb/muxmp4.c
+++
Re: Decent DVD rippers?
Alessio, Am 01.02.2012 11:00, schrieb Fabian Greffrath: There are also some command line tools like xvidenc, h264enc or lxdvdrip which might be easier to package but only provide limited I have seen that you maintain these for ubuntu. Would you mind uploading them to Debian, too? I think all the requirements are met ni Debian nowadays. - Fabian ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Decent DVD rippers?
Dear team, what DVD rippers do we currently have in Debian? Apart from avconv, mencoder and VLC - which all somehow allow to transcode a DVD into a file - I only know of thoggen. While I like the latter very much for its straight interface, it seems dead upstream and does currently only allow to transcode to Theora/Ogg, so no xvid, x264, schroedinger, VP8 and whatever codecs are supported by gstreamer nowadays. I have seen that dmo has: - dvd::rip, which is a frontend for transcode, which in turn is not in Debian (I know we have once discussed this in the past, but what were the reasons this is not in Debian?) - handbrake, which seems to be exactly what I am looking for. Does anyone know reasons not to include this in Debian? - ogmrip, which also seems to come close to my expectations. Again, are there reasons for not having this in Debian? There are also some command line tools like xvidenc, h264enc or lxdvdrip which might be easier to package but only provide limited use. What di you think of the packages I mentioned above? Did I miss one importand DVD ripper? Do you consider them candidates for Debian in general and exspecially for pkg-multimedia? Who is with me? ;) - Fabian ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Decent DVD rippers?
Am Mittwoch, den 01.02.2012, 11:00 +0100 schrieb Fabian Greffrath: Dear team, what DVD rippers do we currently have in Debian? Apart from avconv, mencoder and VLC - which all somehow allow to transcode a DVD into a file - I only know of thoggen. While I like the latter very much for its straight interface, it seems dead upstream and does currently only allow to transcode to Theora/Ogg, so no xvid, x264, schroedinger, VP8 and whatever codecs are supported by gstreamer nowadays. I have seen that dmo has: - dvd::rip, which is a frontend for transcode, which in turn is not in Debian (I know we have once discussed this in the past, but what were the reasons this is not in Debian?) - handbrake, which seems to be exactly what I am looking for. Does anyone know reasons not to include this in Debian? - ogmrip, which also seems to come close to my expectations. Again, are there reasons for not having this in Debian? There are also some command line tools like xvidenc, h264enc or lxdvdrip which might be easier to package but only provide limited use. What di you think of the packages I mentioned above? Did I miss one importand DVD ripper? Maybe not important, but you missed dvdbackup. It's in the Debian archive, but not under the hood of pkg-multimedia (yet). -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Decent DVD rippers?
Am 01.02.2012 10:59, schrieb Benjamin Drung: Maybe not important, but you missed dvdbackup. It's in the Debian archive, but not under the hood of pkg-multimedia (yet). Thanks for the addition, but I prefer rippers that output (transcoded) files that are instantly watchable. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Decent DVD rippers?
2012/2/1 Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com: Did I miss one importand DVD ripper? Do you consider them candidates for Debian in general and exspecially for pkg-multimedia? Who is with me? ;) To have Handbrake in debian would be awesome! mira ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Decent DVD rippers?
On Mi, Feb 01, 2012 at 13:58:44 (CET), Jaromír Mikeš wrote: 2012/2/1 Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com: Did I miss one importand DVD ripper? Do you consider them candidates for Debian in general and exspecially for pkg-multimedia? Who is with me? ;) To have Handbrake in debian would be awesome! I agree that handbrake would be great to have in Debian. Unfortunately, it bundles a lot of libraries that are already in Debian, and IIRC, it contains a considerable number of patches to libavcodec. So AFAIUI, it is in a similar situation as xbmc: Requires a considerable amount of work in order to get it suitable of inclusion into Debian. :-( Cheers, Reinhard -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Decent DVD rippers?
Am 01.02.2012 16:14, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: I agree that handbrake would be great to have in Debian. Unfortunately, it bundles a lot of libraries that are already in Debian, and IIRC, it contains a considerable number of patches to libavcodec. So AFAIUI, it is in a similar situation as xbmc: Requires a considerable amount of work in order to get it suitable of inclusion into Debian. :-( I am working on it, i.e. getting it to (at least) compile without any bundled libraries and so far it only took a few mostly trivial changes. I have, however, not yet figured out how to compile the beast without FAAC. That's where I am stuck at the moment... ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Decent DVD rippers?
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote: Am 01.02.2012 16:14, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: I agree that handbrake would be great to have in Debian. Unfortunately, it bundles a lot of libraries that are already in Debian, and IIRC, it contains a considerable number of patches to libavcodec. So AFAIUI, it is in a similar situation as xbmc: Requires a considerable amount of work in order to get it suitable of inclusion into Debian. :-( I am working on it, i.e. getting it to (at least) compile without any bundled libraries and so far it only took a few mostly trivial changes. I have, however, not yet figured out how to compile the beast without FAAC. That's where I am stuck at the moment... Feel free to push what you currently have to git.debian.org, I might find some time next week to have a closer look. Maybe we can get it to use opencore-aac instead. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
