Re: Notice of mailing list closure: pkg-multimedia-maintainers

[Reinhard Tartler]

Thanks to both of you for your help. I'll add you as moderators shortly
after the list migration.

Best,
Reinhard

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 5:20 PM Jonas Smedegaard  wrote:

> Excerpts from Reinhard Tartler's message of april 12, 2018 9:44 pm:
> > Hi Dominic,
> >
> > Based on the discussion on this list, please do migrate the
> > pkg-multimedia-maintainers list. Sorry for the short notice. I assume
> that
> > the list of current subscribers, as well as the rest of the mailman
> > configuration, will be retained, is that right?
> >
> > I'm OK to continue to serve as old and new list owner for the new mailing
> > list. I'd appreciate if other's would step up and help with weeding out
> the
> > moderation queue.
>
> Feel free to add me as moderator.
>
>  - Jonas
> --
>  * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
>  * Tlf.: +45 40843136 <+45%2040%2084%2031%2036>  Website:
> http://dr.jones.dk/
>
>  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
>
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Please can I upload to https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team?

[Georges Khaznadar]

Thank you IOhannes!

IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) a écrit :
> ...
> then go to the multimedia-team page [1] and request to become a member.

Done :)

-- 
Georges KHAZNADAR et Jocelyne FOURNIER
22 rue des mouettes, 59240 Dunkerque France.
Téléphone +33 (0)3 28 29 17 70



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Notice of mailing list closure: pkg-multimedia-maintainers

[Jonas Smedegaard]

Excerpts from Reinhard Tartler's message of april 12, 2018 9:44 pm:

Hi Dominic,

Based on the discussion on this list, please do migrate the
pkg-multimedia-maintainers list. Sorry for the short notice. I assume that
the list of current subscribers, as well as the rest of the mailman
configuration, will be retained, is that right?

I'm OK to continue to serve as old and new list owner for the new mailing
list. I'd appreciate if other's would step up and help with weeding out the
moderation queue.


Feel free to add me as moderator.

- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

[x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private


pgpruEKst798O.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Notice of mailing list closure: pkg-multimedia-maintainers

[Dominic Hargreaves]

Hi,

Thanks, this list is marked to be migrated. And yes, the subscribers
and configuration will be migrated.

Dominic.

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 07:44:51PM +, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Hi Dominic,
> 
> Based on the discussion on this list, please do migrate the
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers list. Sorry for the short notice. I assume that
> the list of current subscribers, as well as the rest of the mailman
> configuration, will be retained, is that right?
> 
> I'm OK to continue to serve as old and new list owner for the new mailing
> list. I'd appreciate if other's would step up and help with weeding out the
> moderation queue.
> 
> -rt
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 4:22 PM Dominic Hargreaves  wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:05:41AM +0100, James Cowgill wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 02/04/18 16:21, alioth lists migration team wrote:
> > > > Dear list subscribers,
> > > >
> > > > As per the announcement on debian-devel-announce[1] and as part of
> > > > the shutdown of the alioth service, the migration of
> > > > lists.alioth.debian.org mailing lists to alioth-lists.debian.net is
> > now
> > > > underway.
> > > >
> > > > We tried to contact the designated list owner via
> > > > pkg-multimedia-maintainers-ow...@lists.alioth.debian.org but got
> > either no reply,
> > > > or a bounce message. Accordingly, this list will not be migrated to the
> > > > new system and will stop working on 14th April.
> > >
> > > Given that the vast majority of packages are still on the old
> > > lists.alioth.debian.org maintainer address, I think we will need the
> > > list migrated otherwise the team will be screwed. Have I missed
> > something?
> >
> > Would you like to be the new owner?
> >
> > Dominic.
> >
> > ___
> > pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
> > pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
> >
> > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
> >

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Notice of mailing list closure: pkg-multimedia-maintainers

[Sebastian Ramacher]

Hi

On 2018-04-12 19:44:51, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Hi Dominic,
> 
> Based on the discussion on this list, please do migrate the
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers list. Sorry for the short notice. I assume that
> the list of current subscribers, as well as the rest of the mailman
> configuration, will be retained, is that right?
> 
> I'm OK to continue to serve as old and new list owner for the new mailing
> list. I'd appreciate if other's would step up and help with weeding out the
> moderation queue.

I can help with that.

Cheers

> -rt
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 4:22 PM Dominic Hargreaves  wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:05:41AM +0100, James Cowgill wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 02/04/18 16:21, alioth lists migration team wrote:
> > > > Dear list subscribers,
> > > >
> > > > As per the announcement on debian-devel-announce[1] and as part of
> > > > the shutdown of the alioth service, the migration of
> > > > lists.alioth.debian.org mailing lists to alioth-lists.debian.net is
> > now
> > > > underway.
> > > >
> > > > We tried to contact the designated list owner via
> > > > pkg-multimedia-maintainers-ow...@lists.alioth.debian.org but got
> > either no reply,
> > > > or a bounce message. Accordingly, this list will not be migrated to the
> > > > new system and will stop working on 14th April.
> > >
> > > Given that the vast majority of packages are still on the old
> > > lists.alioth.debian.org maintainer address, I think we will need the
> > > list migrated otherwise the team will be screwed. Have I missed
> > something?
> >
> > Would you like to be the new owner?
> >
> > Dominic.
> >
> > ___
> > pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
> > pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
> >
> > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
> >

> ___
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Notice of mailing list closure: pkg-multimedia-maintainers

[Reinhard Tartler]

Hi Dominic,

Based on the discussion on this list, please do migrate the
pkg-multimedia-maintainers list. Sorry for the short notice. I assume that
the list of current subscribers, as well as the rest of the mailman
configuration, will be retained, is that right?

I'm OK to continue to serve as old and new list owner for the new mailing
list. I'd appreciate if other's would step up and help with weeding out the
moderation queue.

-rt



On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 4:22 PM Dominic Hargreaves  wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:05:41AM +0100, James Cowgill wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 02/04/18 16:21, alioth lists migration team wrote:
> > > Dear list subscribers,
> > >
> > > As per the announcement on debian-devel-announce[1] and as part of
> > > the shutdown of the alioth service, the migration of
> > > lists.alioth.debian.org mailing lists to alioth-lists.debian.net is
> now
> > > underway.
> > >
> > > We tried to contact the designated list owner via
> > > pkg-multimedia-maintainers-ow...@lists.alioth.debian.org but got
> either no reply,
> > > or a bounce message. Accordingly, this list will not be migrated to the
> > > new system and will stop working on 14th April.
> >
> > Given that the vast majority of packages are still on the old
> > lists.alioth.debian.org maintainer address, I think we will need the
> > list migrated otherwise the team will be screwed. Have I missed
> something?
>
> Would you like to be the new owner?
>
> Dominic.
>
> ___
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
>
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
>
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Notice of mailing list closure: pkg-multimedia-maintainers

[Dominic Hargreaves]

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:05:41AM +0100, James Cowgill wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 02/04/18 16:21, alioth lists migration team wrote:
> > Dear list subscribers,
> > 
> > As per the announcement on debian-devel-announce[1] and as part of
> > the shutdown of the alioth service, the migration of
> > lists.alioth.debian.org mailing lists to alioth-lists.debian.net is now
> > underway.
> > 
> > We tried to contact the designated list owner via
> > pkg-multimedia-maintainers-ow...@lists.alioth.debian.org but got either no 
> > reply,
> > or a bounce message. Accordingly, this list will not be migrated to the
> > new system and will stop working on 14th April.
> 
> Given that the vast majority of packages are still on the old
> lists.alioth.debian.org maintainer address, I think we will need the
> list migrated otherwise the team will be screwed. Have I missed something?

Would you like to be the new owner?

Dominic.

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Please can I upload to https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team?

[Debian/GNU]

On 04/10/2018 08:06 PM, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
> Hello, I made an upgrade for the package  supercollider-sc3-plugins:
> version 3.7.1 => version 3.9.1, and I intend to do the same for sonic-pi
> if possible.
> 
> However I have no write access to the new VCS repository. Please can my
> account be subscribed to multimedia-team project in salsa.d.o?

you need to have an account on salsa (and if you already have one, you
should also tell people your username :-)).
then go to the multimedia-team page [1] and request to become a member.
somebody might then add you to the team.

gmdasr
IOhannes

[1] https://salsa.debian.org/groups/multimedia-team/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Notice of mailing list closure: pkg-multimedia-maintainers

[James Cowgill]

Hi,

On 11/04/18 15:19, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Hi Mattia,
> 
> I am around, but am unsure what to do. Reading through the past mails on
> this topic on the pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list, I thought the
> plan was to move all packages to use "debian-multime...@lists.debian.org
> " as maintainer, and we could
> safely let go of the alioth list. I may have misunderstood something.

Yes that is the plan, but unfortunately we only have 3 days to do that
before the alioth list is turned off, so I think it's better to have the
list migrated for the time being and let the list go once enough stuff
has been migrated.

Thanks,
James



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Notice of mailing list closure: pkg-multimedia-maintainers

[Reinhard Tartler]

Hi Mattia,

I am around, but am unsure what to do. Reading through the past mails on
this topic on the pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list, I thought the
plan was to move all packages to use "debian-multime...@lists.debian.org"
as maintainer, and we could safely let go of the alioth list. I may have
misunderstood something.

Best,
Reinhard

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 5:10 AM Mattia Rizzolo  wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:05:41AM +0100, James Cowgill wrote:
> > Given that the vast majority of packages are still on the old
> > lists.alioth.debian.org maintainer address, I think we will need the
> > list migrated otherwise the team will be screwed. Have I missed
> something?
>
> Mhh, yes indeed.
>
> James: do you have time to either get ahold of siretart by tomorrow, or
> get formorer appoint you as an ML admin, so you can then ask the
> alioth-lists team to migrate it?
> Otherwise I can deal with formorer and become myself an admin.
>
> But rather, also that new ML is something temporary that will go away in
> few years, so really, please people remember to switch to the @l.d.o ML…
>
> --
> regards,
> Mattia Rizzolo
>
> GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
> more about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
> Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
> Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-
> ___
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
>
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Notice of mailing list closure: pkg-multimedia-maintainers

[Mattia Rizzolo]

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:05:41AM +0100, James Cowgill wrote:
> Given that the vast majority of packages are still on the old
> lists.alioth.debian.org maintainer address, I think we will need the
> list migrated otherwise the team will be screwed. Have I missed something?

Mhh, yes indeed.

James: do you have time to either get ahold of siretart by tomorrow, or
get formorer appoint you as an ML admin, so you can then ask the
alioth-lists team to migrate it?
Otherwise I can deal with formorer and become myself an admin.

But rather, also that new ML is something temporary that will go away in
few years, so really, please people remember to switch to the @l.d.o ML…

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Notice of mailing list closure: pkg-multimedia-maintainers

[James Cowgill]

Hi,

On 02/04/18 16:21, alioth lists migration team wrote:
> Dear list subscribers,
> 
> As per the announcement on debian-devel-announce[1] and as part of
> the shutdown of the alioth service, the migration of
> lists.alioth.debian.org mailing lists to alioth-lists.debian.net is now
> underway.
> 
> We tried to contact the designated list owner via
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers-ow...@lists.alioth.debian.org but got either no 
> reply,
> or a bounce message. Accordingly, this list will not be migrated to the
> new system and will stop working on 14th April.

Given that the vast majority of packages are still on the old
lists.alioth.debian.org maintainer address, I think we will need the
list migrated otherwise the team will be screwed. Have I missed something?

James



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#895154: ffmpeg: FTBFS - make[2]: write error: stdout

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 pending
Bug #895154 [src:ffmpeg] ffmpeg: FTBFS - make[2]: write error: stdout
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
895154: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=895154
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#895125: Soundconverter mp3 issue

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> reassign -1 gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly 1.14.0-1
Bug #895125 [soundconverter] Soundconverter mp3 issue
Bug reassigned from package 'soundconverter' to 'gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly'.
No longer marked as found in versions soundconverter/3.0.0~beta1-2.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #895125 to the same values 
previously set
Bug #895125 [gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly] Soundconverter mp3 issue
Marked as found in versions gst-plugins-ugly1.0/1.14.0-1.
> retitle -1 gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly: should have breaks 
> gstreamer1.0-plugins-good (<< 1.13.1)
Bug #895125 [gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly] Soundconverter mp3 issue
Changed Bug title to 'gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly: should have breaks 
gstreamer1.0-plugins-good (<< 1.13.1)' from 'Soundconverter mp3 issue'.

-- 
895125: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=895125
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#886046: marked as done (soundconverter: Depends on gconf)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> reopen -1
Bug #886046 {Done: Sebastian Ramacher <sramac...@debian.org>} 
[src:soundconverter] soundconverter: Depends on gconf
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions soundconverter/3.0.0-1.

-- 
886046: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=886046
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#895016: soundconverter: Soundconverter AssertionError

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #895016 [soundconverter] soundconverter: Soundconverter AssertionError
Added tag(s) moreinfo.

-- 
895016: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=895016
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: MuseScore (and soundfonts) backporting plans

[Thorsten Glaser]

On Thu, 5 Apr 2018, Fabian Greffrath wrote:

> Have you considered to trigger a transition in backports from
> fluidr3mono-gm-soundfont to musescore-general-soundfont by turning the
> former into a dummy package with a dependency on the latter?

No, first and foremost because we don't do this in sid/testing,
but also because fluidr3mono isn't going to go away.

While musescore-general is a fork off it, fluidr3mono will
still have its use cases, especially as the former is expected
to kinda explode in size, so users of systems with less RAM
will need to use the latter.

I was more thinking of "we don't really need to backport this"
but turns out we do, but it's not a problem (more of a consideration
of mirror space and laziness). But thanks anyway.

Anyway, fluidr3mono is now in backports-NEW too.

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
Sometimes they [people] care too much: pretty printers [and syntax highligh-
ting, d.A.] mechanically produce pretty output that accentuates irrelevant
detail in the program, which is as sensible as putting all the prepositions
in English text in bold font.   -- Rob Pike in "Notes on Programming in C"

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: MuseScore (and soundfonts) backporting plans

[Fabian Greffrath]

Hi Thorsten,

thanks for the heads-up!

Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> I had not planned to backport fluidr3mono-gm-soundfont also, but given that
> it already entered stretch-backports by means of src:musescore there might
> be demand for the binary package to not vanish. Perhaps I should just
upload
> it right now so it can enter backports-NEW already…

Have you considered to trigger a transition in backports from
fluidr3mono-gm-soundfont to musescore-general-soundfont by turning the
former into a dummy package with a dependency on the latter?

 - Fabian


___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> severity -1 serious
Bug #893227 [src:libbluray] libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'

-- 
893227: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893227
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> severity -1 important
Bug #893227 [src:libbluray] libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> tags -1 + upstream
Bug #893227 [src:libbluray] libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9
Added tag(s) upstream.

-- 
893227: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893227
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#894662: vlc: nvlc does not play youtube videos after update to v3.0.1-3, vlc and cvlc play the same url normally

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #894662 [src:vlc] vlc: nvlc does not play youtube videos after update to 
v3.0.1-3, vlc and cvlc play the same url normally
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #894662 to the same tags previously set

-- 
894662: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894662
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#894662: vlc: nvlc does not play youtube videos after update to v3.0.1-3, vlc and cvlc play the same url normally

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #894662 [src:vlc] vlc: nvlc does not play youtube videos after update to 
v3.0.1-3, vlc and cvlc play the same url normally
Added tag(s) moreinfo.

-- 
894662: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894662
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Bug#893278: stretch-pu: package showq/0.4.1+git20161215~dfsg0-2+deb9u1

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: tags -1 + pending

On Sat, 2018-03-31 at 22:27 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> 
> On Sat, 2018-03-17 at 19:33 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Fix the program startup.
> 
> I'm not sure how much we're actually helping by fixing a package that
> was apparently not even trivially tested before upload and had been
> entirely broken for nearly a year before anyone even noticed.
> 
> Feel free to upload, but it seems like time would be better spent
> avoiding us getting to such situations to begin with, rather than
> having to spend time on them after the fact.
> 

Uploaded and flagged for acceptance.

Regards,

Adam

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#894373: blender: Assertion Non-finite sum in path_radiance_clamp_and_sum failed

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tag -1 + moreinfo
Bug #894373 [blender] blender: Assertion Non-finite sum in 
path_radiance_clamp_and_sum failed
Added tag(s) moreinfo.

-- 
894373: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894373
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Bug#893278: stretch-pu: package showq/0.4.1+git20161215~dfsg0-2+deb9u1

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: tags -1 + confirmed

On Sat, 2018-03-17 at 19:33 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Fix the program startup.

I'm not sure how much we're actually helping by fixing a package that
was apparently not even trivially tested before upload and had been
entirely broken for nearly a year before anyone even noticed.

Feel free to upload, but it seems like time would be better spent
avoiding us getting to such situations to begin with, rather than
having to spend time on them after the fact.

Regards,

Adam

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Re: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> forwarded 893227 
> https://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/libbluray-devel/2018-March/002890.html
Bug #893227 [src:libbluray] libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/libbluray-devel/2018-March/002890.html'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
893227: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893227
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: jack-keyboard

[Ross Gammon]

Hi Markus,

Thanks for taking an interest in jack-keyboard, and its status in
Debian. I am cc'ing you in case you are not subscribed to the list.

Unfortunately, messages to the list have a habit of being forgotten about.

I would recommend submitting a "wishlist" bug to the Debian Bug Tracker
against the jack-keyboard package, with this information, and requesting
a new version with your features. The reportbug tool will help with
this, but there is more information here:
https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting

Will you be willing to maintain your fork long-term in case any new bugs
arise that need fixing? Answering this question on the bug too is a good
idea.

Regards,

Ross

On 26/03/18 11:08, Markus Schmidt wrote:
> Dear maintainers,
> 
> I needed some features in jack-keyboard but all projects seem to be
> abandoned, so I cloned the most recent one and did a couple of changes:
> 
>  New keyboard widget design utilizing Cairo
>  Display pressed keys
>  Display velocity
>  New controller "modulation"
>  New controller "pitch bend"
>  New panic button
>  New layout
>  New dark GTK style
>  New icon
>  use autoconfig
> 
> https://github.com/boomshop/jack-keyboard
> 
> Probably you're interested in a new version. If so I would update the
> version number to e.g. 2.8.0.
> 
> Best
> Markus
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
> 



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#894240: vlc: Application binaries should be in the main package

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 894240 + wontfix
Bug #894240 [vlc] vlc: Application binaries should be in the main package
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
894240: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894240
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#894191: ffmpeg: silence when copying AAC (LC) from MKV to AVI

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> severity -1 normal
Bug #894191 [ffmpeg] ffmpeg: silence when copying AAC (LC) from MKV to AVI
Severity set to 'normal' from 'minor'

-- 
894191: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894191
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Bug#886272: marked as done (easytag: re-enable ogg support after corruption bug is fixed)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 25 Mar 2018 12:04:40 +
with message-id <e1f04o8-0009ux...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#886272: fixed in easytag 2.4.3-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #886272,
regarding easytag: re-enable ogg support after corruption bug is fixed
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
886272: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=886272
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: easytag
Version: 2.4.3-2
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Forwarded: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=776110

This bug was going to be cloned from #855251 but apparently you can't
clone merged bugs.

In 2.4.3-2, OGG, OPUS and Speex support was disabled due to a corruption
bug described in #855251. This bug is pending an upstream fix. Once the
fix is available, support should be re-enabled.

James



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: easytag
Source-Version: 2.4.3-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
easytag, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 886...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
James Cowgill <jcowg...@debian.org> (supplier of updated easytag package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2018 12:48:14 +0100
Source: easytag
Binary: easytag easytag-nautilus
Architecture: source
Version: 2.4.3-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers 
<pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: James Cowgill <jcowg...@debian.org>
Description:
 easytag- GTK+ editor for audio file tags
 easytag-nautilus - Nautilus extension for easytag
Closes: 886272
Changes:
 easytag (2.4.3-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * debian/control:
 - Revert OGG support removal in package description.
   * debian/patches:
 - Add patch to revert upstream commit which causes OGG corruption.
   (Closes: #886272)
   * debian/rules:
 - Re-enable OGG, OPUS and Speex support.
Checksums-Sha1:
 24b27cee03fbd4dc714df566a9c84467357ab943 2454 easytag_2.4.3-4.dsc
 7072a7326f59c419e551d2f1a44a469fd2789128 14212 easytag_2.4.3-4.debian.tar.xz
 7fbfb0b767c336a3d2b9fb8571948440b979071c 16555 easytag_2.4.3-4_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 fe6a50d7c1e714e0108720e90d7b313f9a5529b00bcd1ecd8701ef2609e706bc 2454 
easytag_2.4.3-4.dsc
 4c4928d7399830a3938bdb5044a88ec19dc8d9f10aa8236212dbb6fdc4428bd7 14212 
easytag_2.4.3-4.debian.tar.xz
 b8bfa5ae70acd92856115a37ca56a7dee0aadfa1e99ccabbd4640bc3d476b954 16555 
easytag_2.4.3-4_source.buildinfo
Files:
 f755815f04ba61c7e8de9c394442eaa4 2454 sound optional easytag_2.4.3-4.dsc
 a8f19ed2ed32d28612ab0d59a12dd4d4 14212 sound optional 
easytag_2.4.3-4.debian.tar.xz
 3949aa9fb66e9e8424d7c1c280c237aa 16555 sound optional 
easytag_2.4.3-4_source.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=lgvp
-END PGP SIGNATURE End Message ---
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Bug#870341: libvorbis: CVE-2017-11333

[Petter Reinholdtsen]

Control: fixed -1 1.3.5-4+deb9u1 1.3.5-4.1

I've tried to figure out the details, as as far sa I can tell,
the patch fixing #876778 (CVE-2017-14633), also fixes this issue,
by limiting the number of channels allowed.  At least that is what
I can read from the upstream bug tracker, where the issues
for the two CVEs are closed with the same commit.

-- 
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Re: simplescreenrecorder: FTBFS with FFmpeg 3.5

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> forwarded -1 https://github.com/MaartenBaert/ssr/issues/640
Bug #888347 [src:simplescreenrecorder] simplescreenrecorder: FTBFS with FFmpeg 
4.0
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://github.com/MaartenBaert/ssr/issues/640'.

-- 
888347: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=888347
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#893284: vlc: VLC segfaults on highlight of Playback>Renderer menu option

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> reassign -1 libmicrodns0 0.0.9-1
Bug #893284 [src:vlc] vlc: VLC segfaults on highlight of Playback>Renderer menu 
option
Bug reassigned from package 'src:vlc' to 'libmicrodns0'.
No longer marked as found in versions vlc/3.0.1-3.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #893284 to the same values 
previously set
Bug #893284 [libmicrodns0] vlc: VLC segfaults on highlight of Playback>Renderer 
menu option
Marked as found in versions libmicrodns/0.0.9-1.
> tags -1 = fixed-upstream upstream
Bug #893284 [libmicrodns0] vlc: VLC segfaults on highlight of Playback>Renderer 
menu option
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream and upstream; removed tag(s) moreinfo.

-- 
893284: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893284
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#893284: vlc: VLC segfaults on highlight of Playback>Renderer menu option

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #893284 [src:vlc] vlc: VLC segfaults on highlight of Playback>Renderer menu 
option
Added tag(s) moreinfo.

-- 
893284: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893284
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Bug#870341: libvorbis: CVE-2017-11333

[Petter Reinholdtsen]

According to the upstream developer TD-Linux on #xiph, the
CVE-2017-11333 issue is fixed upstream.  I have not checked
the details but suspect it was fixed in version 1.3.6
released yesterday.
-- 
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#893203: Acknowledgement (src:collada2gltf: FTBFS with rapidjson 1.0.2)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 893203 + upstream
Bug #893203 [src:collada2gltf] src:collada2gltf: FTBFS with rapidjson 1.0.2
Added tag(s) upstream.
> tag 893203 + fixed-upstream
Bug #893203 [src:collada2gltf] src:collada2gltf: FTBFS with rapidjson 1.0.2
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
893203: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893203
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#892582: mixxx: Build-Depend on scour

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tag -1 + pending
Bug #892582 [src:mixxx] mixxx: Build-Depend on scour
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
892582: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=892582
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#890102: openshot: Openshot 2.4.1-2 will not start

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tag -1 unreproducible
Bug #890102 [openshot] openshot: Openshot 2.4.1-2 will not start
Added tag(s) unreproducible.

-- 
890102: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=890102
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#890102: openshot: Openshot 2.4.1-2 will not start

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> severity -1 important
Bug #890102 [openshot] openshot: Openshot 2.4.1-2 will not start
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'

-- 
890102: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=890102
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: CEF in Debian?

[Steinar H. Gunderson]

On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 02:06:39PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> I'm wondering if there's a chance of having CEF (Chromium Embedded Framework)
> in Debian. For those who don't know, CEF is a library that enables easy use
> of Chromium from other applications, either as a UI or for offscreen
> rendering -- my own video mixer Nageru is getting CEF support these days,
> which is why I'm interested.

Ping :-)

I forgot to mention last time, but I assume obs-studio (already in Debian)
would also be interested in CEF, for similar reasons. Cc-ing the maintainer
list.

/* Steinar */
-- 
Homepage: https://www.sesse.net/

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Bug#888288: RFS: libheif/0.0.1+20180124133753+git68fb4fe-1 [ITP: #888278]

[Sebastian Ramacher]

On 2018-03-01 17:45:55, Joachim Bauch wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
> 
> On 13.02.2018 15:45, Joachim Bauch wrote:
> > On 07.02.2018 09:38, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> >> with the package name changed to libheif1, the package looks good from my
> >> perspective. One minor nitpick: please remove the dot at the end of the 
> >> short
> >> description of libheif1 and add something like "- shared library" at the 
> >> end.
> >> Also, in the long description add the customary "This package contains the
> >> shared library." part at the end.
> > 
> > thanks for your additional feedback, I uploaded a new package with your
> > suggestions based on the finally released upstream 1.0.0 to mentors:
> > 
> > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libh/libheif/libheif_1.0.0-1.dsc
> > 
> > Please let me know if there is anything else I should do to get this
> > imported into Debian.
> 
> just checking if there is anything else I need to do to help move this
> forward. If you currently are too busy - no problem, I was just
> wondering if I missed any feedback.

Sorry for the delay. Uploaded.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Re: musescore: Segment violation when Musescore opens with wizard (start center) active

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> retitle 842926 musescore: Segment violation when Musescore opens with wizard 
> (start center) active
Bug #842926 [musescore] [musescore] Segment violation when Musescore opens with 
wizard (start center) active.
Changed Bug title to 'musescore: Segment violation when Musescore opens with 
wizard (start center) active' from '[musescore] Segment violation when 
Musescore opens with wizard (start center) active.'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
842926: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=842926
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: rtkit package dependencies

[James Cowgill]

Hi,

On 01/03/18 21:46, Adam Lambert wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On my debian testing system, I see in the recent change between version
> 0.11-5 and 0.11-6 that the dependencies of rtkit package were changed to
> move policykit-1 from 'recommends' to 'depends'.   Prior to this, I had
> (well, still have,  just with the old version of rtkit) a SystemD free
> environment, and I was really hoping to keep it that way (actually, I will
> keep it that way, even if I have to depart the Debian universe after 20
> years of using it, which would be a shame).
> 
> I am requesting (strongly) that the 'depends' be reverted back to
> 'recommends'.

You realise that rtkit is totally useless without policykit (it will
refuse all operations unless it is running)?

James



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Bug#888288: RFS: libheif/0.0.1+20180124133753+git68fb4fe-1 [ITP: #888278]

[Joachim Bauch]

Hi Sebastian,

On 13.02.2018 15:45, Joachim Bauch wrote:
> On 07.02.2018 09:38, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>> with the package name changed to libheif1, the package looks good from my
>> perspective. One minor nitpick: please remove the dot at the end of the short
>> description of libheif1 and add something like "- shared library" at the end.
>> Also, in the long description add the customary "This package contains the
>> shared library." part at the end.
> 
> thanks for your additional feedback, I uploaded a new package with your
> suggestions based on the finally released upstream 1.0.0 to mentors:
> 
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libh/libheif/libheif_1.0.0-1.dsc
> 
> Please let me know if there is anything else I should do to get this
> imported into Debian.

just checking if there is anything else I need to do to help move this
forward. If you currently are too busy - no problem, I was just
wondering if I missed any feedback.

Thanks and best regards,
  Joachim



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Proposed multimedia team migration to salsa.d.o

[Ondrej Novy]

Hi,

2018-02-26 10:36 GMT+01:00 Mattia Rizzolo :
>
> > having said that, i'm all for abandoning the
> > pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.d.o list in favour of
> > debian-multimedia@l.d.o
>

If we agree on this, I can mass-change this in Git. Already have nice
script for this, you know :).

So should I change
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.d.o -> debian-multimedia@l.d.o
in Git?

Btw: Why not use tracker email for team?

-- 
Best regards
 Ondřej Nový

Email: n...@ondrej.org
PGP: 3D98 3C52 EB85 980C 46A5  6090 3573 1255 9D1E 064B
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Proposed multimedia team migration to salsa.d.o

[James Cowgill]

Hi,

On 26/02/18 08:50, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:22:35AM +, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> I just got an email as one of the "list owners" of
>> pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org - the basic question is
>> whether we want to continue using the list (on the new migration host) or
>> whether we abandon it in favor of debian-multime...@lists.debian.org
>>
>> In the past, we used both lists with different emphasis. From the
>> discussion of this thread, I believe the answer the latter, but I wanted to
>> check for other opinions and thoughts on this.
> 
> yes, please confirm them that they should leave it behind.

I think we should ask for the pkg-multimedia-maintainers list to be kept
until we have finished changing the Maintainer field on all the
packages. Otherwise the unmigrated packages will all become instantly RC
buggy when alioth is turned off.

James



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Proposed multimedia team migration to salsa.d.o

[Mattia Rizzolo]

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:12:08AM +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:
> On 02/26/2018 09:50 AM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > yes, please confirm them that they should leave it behind.
> 
> 
> just so i understand it (being a non-native, i sometimes screw up with
> phrases to mean the exact opposite): with "leave it behind" you mean
> that they should abandon it so that in the mid future there will be no
> more  list?

I mean, let pkg-multimedia-maintainers@ die with alioth.

> having said that, i'm all for abandoning the
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.d.o list in favour of
> debian-multimedia@l.d.o

BTW:

udd=> select count(distinct source) from sources where distribution = 'debian' 
and release = 'sid' and maintainer_email = 'debian-multime...@lists.debian.org';
 count
---
87
(1 row)

udd=> select count(distinct source) from sources where distribution = 'debian' 
and release = 'sid' and maintainer_email = 
'pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org';
 count
---
   458
(1 row)


I believe we've been forgetting to move the packages while uploading
them recently…

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Proposed multimedia team migration to salsa.d.o

[Debian/GNU]

On 02/26/2018 09:50 AM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:22:35AM +, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> I just got an email as one of the "list owners" of
>> pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org - the basic question is
>> whether we want to continue using the list (on the new migration host) or
>> whether we abandon it in favor of debian-multime...@lists.debian.org
>>
>> In the past, we used both lists with different emphasis. From the
>> discussion of this thread, I believe the answer the latter, but I wanted to
>> check for other opinions and thoughts on this.
> 
> yes, please confirm them that they should leave it behind.


just so i understand it (being a non-native, i sometimes screw up with
phrases to mean the exact opposite): with "leave it behind" you mean
that they should abandon it so that in the mid future there will be no
more  list?

i'm merely asking, because it could also be read (after all, i'm not the
only non-native) to mean "leave as is", that is to keep the list.

having said that, i'm all for abandoning the
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.d.o list in favour of
debian-multimedia@l.d.o

gadsmt
IOhannes



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Proposed multimedia team migration to salsa.d.o

[Mattia Rizzolo]

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:22:35AM +, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> I just got an email as one of the "list owners" of
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org - the basic question is
> whether we want to continue using the list (on the new migration host) or
> whether we abandon it in favor of debian-multime...@lists.debian.org
> 
> In the past, we used both lists with different emphasis. From the
> discussion of this thread, I believe the answer the latter, but I wanted to
> check for other opinions and thoughts on this.

yes, please confirm them that they should leave it behind.

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Proposed multimedia team migration to salsa.d.o

[Reinhard Tartler]

On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 8:53 AM James Cowgill  wrote:

>
> > listmasters mentioned multiple times that they don't want something on
> > l.d.o to appear in the Maintainers field.
>
> I don't think they said that. They said that they don't want lots of
> mailing lists on lists.debian.org for purely for bugs/packaging things.
> My interpretation of the original announcement is that
> debian-multimedia@l.d.o qualifies because it is formally a list for all
> multimedia discussion as opposed to just packaging.
>
>
I just got an email as one of the "list owners" of
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org - the basic question is
whether we want to continue using the list (on the new migration host) or
whether we abandon it in favor of debian-multime...@lists.debian.org

In the past, we used both lists with different emphasis. From the
discussion of this thread, I believe the answer the latter, but I wanted to
check for other opinions and thoughts on this.

Best,
Reinhard
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Re: audacity: FTBFS with FFmpeg 3.5

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 fixed-upstream
Bug #888332 [src:audacity] audacity: FTBFS with FFmpeg 4.0
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/audacity/audacity/pull/249
Bug #888332 [src:audacity] audacity: FTBFS with FFmpeg 4.0
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/audacity/audacity/pull/249'.

-- 
888332: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=888332
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Re: taopm: Taopm instruments fail to compile

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + patch
Bug #789129 [taopm] taopm: Taopm instruments fail to compile
Added tag(s) patch.

-- 
789129: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=789129
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#890292: vlc: convert / save file selection unable to clear list / select multiple files from list

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + upstream
Bug #890292 [src:vlc] vlc: convert / save file selection unable to clear list / 
select multiple files from list
Added tag(s) upstream.

-- 
890292: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=890292
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Regarding openshot-qt

[Debian/GNU]

On 02/17/2018 02:17 AM, Prafulla Giri wrote:
> First and foremost, I'd like to thank you for the fact that you have taken
> the newer version of OpenShot (the 2.x series) under your wings:
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openshot-qt

just for the record:
because you actually contacted te Debian packaging team (and it seems
that the Ubuntu packages just take the Debian package as is; so you
contacted the right entity), the URL should read:

  https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/openshot-qt


also if you are having stability issues, please file bugs (if they
haven't been filed already).

gdamrs
IOhannes



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#888501 closed by Sebastian Ramacher <sramac...@debian.org> (Re: Bug#888501: gstreamer1.0-vaapi: Latests versions does not work at all)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> severity -1 important
Bug #888501 [libva2] gstreamer1.0-vaapi: Latests versions does not work at all
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'

-- 
888501: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=888501
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Bug#888501: closed by Sebastian Ramacher <sramac...@debian.org> (Re: Bug#888501: gstreamer1.0-vaapi: Latests versions does not work at all)

[Sebastian Ramacher]

Control: severity -1 important

On 2018-02-15 11:56:19, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Control: reopen -1
> Control: reassign -1 libva2
> 
> >...
> > > On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 10:40:36 -0200 Junior Polegato 
> > >  wrote:
> > > 
> > > > libva info: VA-API version 0.40.0
> > > > libva info: va_getDriverName() returns 0
> > > > libva info: Trying to open /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/dri/i965_drv_video.so
> > > > libva error: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/dri/i965_drv_video.so has no 
> > > > function
> > > > __vaDriverInit_0_32
> > > > libva info: va_openDriver() returns -1
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > this looks like a version mismatch between your Intel driver and
> > > libva, nothing related to gstreamer-vaapi.
> > 
> > Yes, so people need to update their drivers at the same time. We could add
> > Breaks for the old driver packges, but that woul just ensure that we make 
> > the
> > upgrade path from stretch to buster more complicated.
> 
> It would actually make the upgrade path easier by ensuring that people 
> and distributions have versions that work together.
> 
> stretch -> buster upgrade scenarios are one case.
> 
> Backports are another, where a new libva might be pulled in without
> matching new driver packages (proper package dependencies might help
> to make it clear that backporting libva can be problematic).

libva is currently not backportable. You'd need to rebuild all consumers in
backports. And unless somebody does the work to support that, this isn't any
sensible scenario.

> And without proper package dependencies, it might happen that testing
> contains versions that don't work together.
> This would create problems for people running testing,
> and for derivative distributions that are based on testing.

The drivers already have strict dependencies on the correct libva version they
support. And if the drivers for the correct version are missing, players will
fallback to software decoding in the worst case (if they don't, it's a bug in
the player / decoder).

Closing and lowering the severity. Please do not reopen again.

Cheers

> 
> > Cheers
> 
> cu
> Adrian
> 
> -- 
> 
>"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
> of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
>"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
>Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
> 

-- 
Sebastian Ramacher


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Bug#888501: closed by Sebastian Ramacher <sramac...@debian.org> (Re: Bug#888501: gstreamer1.0-vaapi: Latests versions does not work at all)

[Adrian Bunk]

Control: reopen -1
Control: reassign -1 libva2

>...
> > On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 10:40:36 -0200 Junior Polegato 
> >  wrote:
> > 
> > > libva info: VA-API version 0.40.0
> > > libva info: va_getDriverName() returns 0
> > > libva info: Trying to open /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/dri/i965_drv_video.so
> > > libva error: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/dri/i965_drv_video.so has no function
> > > __vaDriverInit_0_32
> > > libva info: va_openDriver() returns -1
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > this looks like a version mismatch between your Intel driver and
> > libva, nothing related to gstreamer-vaapi.
> 
> Yes, so people need to update their drivers at the same time. We could add
> Breaks for the old driver packges, but that woul just ensure that we make the
> upgrade path from stretch to buster more complicated.

It would actually make the upgrade path easier by ensuring that people 
and distributions have versions that work together.

stretch -> buster upgrade scenarios are one case.

Backports are another, where a new libva might be pulled in without
matching new driver packages (proper package dependencies might help
to make it clear that backporting libva can be problematic).

And without proper package dependencies, it might happen that testing
contains versions that don't work together.
This would create problems for people running testing,
and for derivative distributions that are based on testing.

> Cheers

cu
Adrian

-- 

   "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
   "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
   Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#888501 closed by Sebastian Ramacher <sramac...@debian.org> (Re: Bug#888501: gstreamer1.0-vaapi: Latests versions does not work at all)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> reopen -1
Bug #888501 {Done: Sebastian Ramacher } [libva] 
gstreamer1.0-vaapi: Latests versions does not work at all
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #888501 to the same values 
previously set
> reassign -1 libva2
Bug #888501 [libva] gstreamer1.0-vaapi: Latests versions does not work at all
Bug reassigned from package 'libva' to 'libva2'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #888501 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #888501 to the same values 
previously set

-- 
888501: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=888501
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Re: gstreamer1.0-vaapi: Latests versions does not work at all

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 888501 libva
Bug #888501 [gstreamer1.0-vaapi] gstreamer1.0-vaapi: Latests versions does not 
work at all
Bug reassigned from package 'gstreamer1.0-vaapi' to 'libva'.
No longer marked as found in versions gstreamer-vaapi/1.12.4-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #888501 to the same values 
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
888501: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=888501
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Bug#888288: RFS: libheif/0.0.1+20180124133753+git68fb4fe-1 [ITP: #888278]

[Joachim Bauch]

Hi Sebastian,

On 07.02.2018 09:38, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> with the package name changed to libheif1, the package looks good from my
> perspective. One minor nitpick: please remove the dot at the end of the short
> description of libheif1 and add something like "- shared library" at the end.
> Also, in the long description add the customary "This package contains the
> shared library." part at the end.

thanks for your additional feedback, I uploaded a new package with your
suggestions based on the finally released upstream 1.0.0 to mentors:

https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libh/libheif/libheif_1.0.0-1.dsc

Please let me know if there is anything else I should do to get this
imported into Debian.

Thanks and best regards,
  Joachim



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#884956: vlc: icons are too big

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> reassign -1 libqt5core5a 5.9.2+dfsg-6
Bug #884956 [src:vlc] vlc: icons are too big
Bug reassigned from package 'src:vlc' to 'libqt5core5a'.
No longer marked as found in versions vlc/3.0.0~rc2-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #884956 to the same values 
previously set
Bug #884956 [libqt5core5a] vlc: icons are too big
Marked as found in versions qtbase-opensource-src/5.9.2+dfsg-6.
> forwarded -1 https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-53022
Bug #884956 [libqt5core5a] vlc: icons are too big
Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-53022' from 
'https://trac.videolan.org/vlc/ticket/19385'.
> severity -1 normal
Bug #884956 [libqt5core5a] vlc: icons are too big
Severity set to 'normal' from 'minor'
> tags -1 = upstream
Bug #884956 [libqt5core5a] vlc: icons are too big
Added tag(s) upstream.

-- 
884956: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=884956
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#888348: lives: FTBFS with FFmpeg 3.5

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 fixed-upstream
Bug #888348 [src:lives] lives: FTBFS with FFmpeg 3.5
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.

-- 
888348: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=888348
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: future of collada2gltf/o3dgc?

[Sebastian Ramacher]

Hi

On 2018-02-05 22:20:14, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I once pushed packaging of OpenCOLLADA and collada2gltf (and for that
> one o3dgc and rapidjson) for LibreOffice being able to "import"/render
> COLLADA.
> 
> This feature has been removed with LibreOffice 6.0, and that one is now
> in testing. The TDF library for glTF is already orphaned: #889677)
> 
> Now, OpenCOLLADA is supposedly needed for blender so it probably should
> stay, but what about collada2gltf? Is there anybody of Debian Multimedia
> (where it was added to, same as o3dgc) interested in it? Or should we
> just remove it?

If there are now reverse-dependencies, let's just remove it.

Cheers

> 
> (Note: keeping collada2gltf blocks updating rapidjson to 1.1.0 which
> ttbomk blocks other stuff. In any case we should go from 0.12 to 1.1.0
> anyways.)
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Rene
> 
> ___
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

-- 
Sebastian Ramacher


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#889915: libfaad2 in Wheezy contains patches for some security bugs. They were not backported to Jessie.

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 889915 +security +jessie
Bug #889915 [libfaad2] libfaad2 in Wheezy contains patches for some security 
bugs. They were not backported to Jessie.
Added tag(s) security.
Bug #889915 [libfaad2] libfaad2 in Wheezy contains patches for some security 
bugs. They were not backported to Jessie.
Added tag(s) jessie.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
889915: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=889915
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#889815: chromaprint FTBFS on big endian: test failures

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> forwarded -1 https://github.com/acoustid/chromaprint/issues/46
Bug #889815 [src:chromaprint] chromaprint FTBFS on big endian: test failures
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://github.com/acoustid/chromaprint/issues/46'.
> tags -1 + upstream
Bug #889815 [src:chromaprint] chromaprint FTBFS on big endian: test failures
Added tag(s) upstream.
> severity -1 important
Bug #889815 [src:chromaprint] chromaprint FTBFS on big endian: test failures
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'

-- 
889815: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=889815
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Bug#888288: RFS: libheif/0.0.1+20180124133753+git68fb4fe-1 [ITP: #888278]

[Joachim Bauch]

Hi Sebastian,

On 06.02.2018 10:21, Joachim Bauch wrote:
> thanks for your feedback, I uploaded a new version to mentors:
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libh/libheif/libheif_0.0.1+20180206084258+git9d8f256-1.dsc

a new version based on feedback from IOhannes is available at
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libh/libheif/libheif_0.0.1+20180206084258+git9d8f256-2.dsc

Changes:
- renamed library package to "libheif1".

Thanks and best regards,
  Joachim


> Additional comments see below.
> 
> On 03.02.2018 14:47, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>> That fails to build:
>>
>> | g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..   -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -I../src -g 
>> -O2 
>> -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>/libheif-0.0.1+20180124133753+git68fb4fe=. 
>> -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wall -Werror 
>> -Wsign-compare -Wconversion -Wno-sign-conversion -Wno-error=conversion -c -o 
>> heif_info-heif_info.o `test -f 'heif_info.cc' || echo './'`heif_info.cc
>> | encoder_png.cc: In member function 'virtual bool PngEncoder::Encode(const 
>> heif_image_handle*, const heif_image*, const string&)':
>> | encoder_png.cc:56:62: error: 'strerror' was not declared in this scope
>> |  fprintf(stderr, "Can't open %s: %s\n", filename.c_str(), 
>> strerror(errno));
>> |   ^~~~
>> | encoder_png.cc:56:62: note: suggested alternative: 'perror'
>> |  fprintf(stderr, "Can't open %s: %s\n", filename.c_str(), 
>> strerror(errno));
>> |   ^~~~
>> |   perror
>> | Makefile:553: recipe for target 'heif_convert-encoder_png.o' failed
> 
> Interesting, on Ubuntu the "string.h" seems to get pulled in by some
> other header and it compiles fine. Anyway, this is fixed upstream and
> I verified by building the package on sid.
> 
>> Some other issues:
>>
>> * The library package should be named based on the SONAME, so that would be
>>   libheif1.
> 
> Changed to "libheif-1", or should the name be without the dash?
> 
>> * Current Standards-Version is 4.1.3.
> 
> Changed, however the lintian on mentors now complains that the version
> is too new: "newer-standards-version 4.1.3 (current is 3.9.8)"
> 
>> * If you bump debhelper compatibility to 10 or 11, you can drop the explicit
>>   --with autreconf and --parallel in d/rules. You could also drop 
>> dh-autoreconf
>>   from Build-Depends.
> 
> Nice, I bumped the compatibility to 10 in the updated package.
> 
> If everything looks good from a packaging side now, we will release
> 1.0.0 shortly and I will update the package with the release.
> 
> Thanks again and best regards,
>   Joachim
> 



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Bug#888288: RFS: libheif/0.0.1+20180124133753+git68fb4fe-1 [ITP: #888278]

[Sebastian Ramacher]

Hi Joachim

with the package name changed to libheif1, the package looks good from my
perspective. One minor nitpick: please remove the dot at the end of the short
description of libheif1 and add something like "- shared library" at the end.
Also, in the long description add the customary "This package contains the
shared library." part at the end.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Bug#888288: RFS: libheif/0.0.1+20180124133753+git68fb4fe-1 [ITP: #888278]

[Joachim Bauch]

Hi IOhannes,

On 06.02.2018 23:21, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:
> On 02/06/2018 10:21 AM, Joachim Bauch wrote:
>> Hi Sebastian,
>>
>> thanks for your feedback, I uploaded a new version to mentors:
>> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libh/libheif/libheif_0.0.1+20180206084258+git9d8f256-1.dsc
>>
>> Additional comments see below.
>>
>> On 03.02.2018 14:47, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>>> That fails to build:
> [...]
>>
>> Interesting, on Ubuntu the "string.h" seems to get pulled in by some
>> other header and it compiles fine. 
> 
> well, in general "you" should explicitely include headers for the
> functions you need, rather than relying on "some other" header to do
> that for you - that other header might have required 
> internally but a newer version might have a different private
> implementation that allowed them to drop the include...

yeah, I'm aware of that and in other places  was explicitly
included. It was probably missed in this location due to insufficient
testing - anway, it's already fixed.

>>> Some other issues:
>>>
>>> * The library package should be named based on the SONAME, so that would be
>>>   libheif1.
>>
>> Changed to "libheif-1", or should the name be without the dash?
> 
> the name should be "libheif1", without the dash.
> (the dash is usually used if you want multiple major versions of a
> library to be coinstallable, e.g. libheif1.0-2 and libheif3-1; urgh)

I don't think this should be necessary and will update the name to
"libheif1".

>>> * Current Standards-Version is 4.1.3.
>>
>> Changed, however the lintian on mentors now complains that the version
>> is too new: "newer-standards-version 4.1.3 (current is 3.9.8)"
> 
> seems like you have an old lintian on your system.
> (e.g. because you are building on a Debian/stretch machine in a
> sid-chroot; and/or because your machine hasn't been updated in a while)

The package is building / linting fine locally, it's the lintian on
"mentors.debian.net" that reports the newer version.

Thanks for your feedback and best regards,
  Joachim



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Bug#888288: RFS: libheif/0.0.1+20180124133753+git68fb4fe-1 [ITP: #888278]

[Debian/GNU]

On 02/06/2018 10:21 AM, Joachim Bauch wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
> 
> thanks for your feedback, I uploaded a new version to mentors:
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libh/libheif/libheif_0.0.1+20180206084258+git9d8f256-1.dsc
> 
> Additional comments see below.
> 
> On 03.02.2018 14:47, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>> That fails to build:
[...]
> 
> Interesting, on Ubuntu the "string.h" seems to get pulled in by some
> other header and it compiles fine. 

well, in general "you" should explicitely include headers for the
functions you need, rather than relying on "some other" header to do
that for you - that other header might have required 
internally but a newer version might have a different private
implementation that allowed them to drop the include...

> 
>> Some other issues:
>>
>> * The library package should be named based on the SONAME, so that would be
>>   libheif1.
> 
> Changed to "libheif-1", or should the name be without the dash?

the name should be "libheif1", without the dash.
(the dash is usually used if you want multiple major versions of a
library to be coinstallable, e.g. libheif1.0-2 and libheif3-1; urgh)

> 
>> * Current Standards-Version is 4.1.3.
> 
> Changed, however the lintian on mentors now complains that the version
> is too new: "newer-standards-version 4.1.3 (current is 3.9.8)"

seems like you have an old lintian on your system.
(e.g. because you are building on a Debian/stretch machine in a
sid-chroot; and/or because your machine hasn't been updated in a while)



gfmdsr
IOhannes



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Bug#888288: RFS: libheif/0.0.1+20180124133753+git68fb4fe-1 [ITP: #888278]

[Joachim Bauch]

Hi Sebastian,

thanks for your feedback, I uploaded a new version to mentors:
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libh/libheif/libheif_0.0.1+20180206084258+git9d8f256-1.dsc

Additional comments see below.

On 03.02.2018 14:47, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> That fails to build:
> 
> | g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..   -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -I../src -g 
> -O2 
> -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>/libheif-0.0.1+20180124133753+git68fb4fe=. 
> -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wall -Werror 
> -Wsign-compare -Wconversion -Wno-sign-conversion -Wno-error=conversion -c -o 
> heif_info-heif_info.o `test -f 'heif_info.cc' || echo './'`heif_info.cc
> | encoder_png.cc: In member function 'virtual bool PngEncoder::Encode(const 
> heif_image_handle*, const heif_image*, const string&)':
> | encoder_png.cc:56:62: error: 'strerror' was not declared in this scope
> |  fprintf(stderr, "Can't open %s: %s\n", filename.c_str(), 
> strerror(errno));
> |   ^~~~
> | encoder_png.cc:56:62: note: suggested alternative: 'perror'
> |  fprintf(stderr, "Can't open %s: %s\n", filename.c_str(), 
> strerror(errno));
> |   ^~~~
> |   perror
> | Makefile:553: recipe for target 'heif_convert-encoder_png.o' failed

Interesting, on Ubuntu the "string.h" seems to get pulled in by some
other header and it compiles fine. Anyway, this is fixed upstream and
I verified by building the package on sid.

> Some other issues:
> 
> * The library package should be named based on the SONAME, so that would be
>   libheif1.

Changed to "libheif-1", or should the name be without the dash?

> * Current Standards-Version is 4.1.3.

Changed, however the lintian on mentors now complains that the version
is too new: "newer-standards-version 4.1.3 (current is 3.9.8)"

> * If you bump debhelper compatibility to 10 or 11, you can drop the explicit
>   --with autreconf and --parallel in d/rules. You could also drop 
> dh-autoreconf
>   from Build-Depends.

Nice, I bumped the compatibility to 10 in the updated package.

If everything looks good from a packaging side now, we will release
1.0.0 shortly and I will update the package with the release.

Thanks again and best regards,
  Joachim



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#889528: mpv: Reading bluray using mpv fails

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 - confirmed
Bug #889528 [mpv] mpv: Reading bluray using mpv fails
Removed tag(s) confirmed.
> reassign -1 libbluray-dev 1:1.0.2-1
Bug #889528 [mpv] mpv: Reading bluray using mpv fails
Bug reassigned from package 'mpv' to 'libbluray-dev'.
No longer marked as found in versions mpv/0.27.0-3.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #889528 to the same values 
previously set
Bug #889528 [libbluray-dev] mpv: Reading bluray using mpv fails
Marked as found in versions libbluray/1:1.0.2-1.
> retitle -1 libbluray-dev: missing dependencies on libxml, freetype, and 
> fontconfig
Bug #889528 [libbluray-dev] mpv: Reading bluray using mpv fails
Changed Bug title to 'libbluray-dev: missing dependencies on libxml, freetype, 
and fontconfig' from 'mpv: Reading bluray using mpv fails'.
> severity -1 serious
Bug #889528 [libbluray-dev] libbluray-dev: missing dependencies on libxml, 
freetype, and fontconfig
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> affects -1 src:mpv
Bug #889528 [libbluray-dev] libbluray-dev: missing dependencies on libxml, 
freetype, and fontconfig
Added indication that 889528 affects src:mpv

-- 
889528: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=889528
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#889528: mpv: Reading bluray using mpv fails

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #889528 [mpv] mpv: Reading bluray using mpv fails
Added tag(s) confirmed.

-- 
889528: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=889528
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#889545: libopenmpt0: possible out-of-bounds memory read with malformed STP files

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> retitle -1 libopenmpt0: CVE-2018-6611
Bug #889545 [libopenmpt0] libopenmpt0: possible out-of-bounds memory read with 
malformed STP files
Changed Bug title to 'libopenmpt0: CVE-2018-6611' from 'libopenmpt0: possible 
out-of-bounds memory read with malformed STP files'.

-- 
889545: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=889545
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: salsa commits ML

[Mattia Rizzolo]

On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 09:14:13PM +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> > Are you subscribed to the 'vcs' keywords?  Check out your subscriptions
> > default.
> 
> It looks like this was the point ;) Now I got some commits messages ...
> 
> Thank you Mattia ... I think we should also update our wiki pages

Rather than the debian-multimedia pages, I believe $somebody should
rather invest some not-small amount of time in some serious tracker.d.o
user documentation.

There is https://tracker.debian.org/docs/ but that's mostly targeted to
distro-tracker devs and anyway it's also quite lacking in some areas, or
not totally up to date.

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: salsa commits ML

[Jaromír Mikeš]

2018-02-02 9:06 GMT+01:00 Mattia Rizzolo :

> On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 07:29:11PM +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> > 2018-01-31 12:16 GMT+01:00 James Cowgill :
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 31/01/18 11:02, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 09:32:09AM +, James Cowgill wrote:
> > > >> pkg-multimedia-commits is dead now that things have been migrated to
> > > salsa.
> > > >>
> > > >> For salsa you can:
> > > >> - Join #debian-multimedia - all commits are sent there.
> > > >> - Subscribe to a package on tracker.d.o and enable the "vcs"
> keyword.
> > > >   - join the multimedia team on tracker: https://tracker.debian.org/
> > > teams/debian-multimedia/
> > > >
> > > > Then you won't need subscribe to single packages.
> > >
> > > I remember trying this before, but tracker won't let me join the team
> > > (or any teams at all it seems).
>
> So there was also a bug that prevented joining a team if you had
> multiple emails registered in tracker.  That's now fixed!
> (this also means I couldn't test it myself up until now, although I was
> part of a couple of teams I created and it works there).
>
> > Hmm I have "join multimedia team" but I didn't received single commit
> > message yet :(
> > Also subscribe to all packages one by one is not what I like :( 
> > I want to see all commits as I am learning from other's work.
>
> Are you subscribed to the 'vcs' keywords?  Check out your subscriptions
> default.
>

​It looks like this was the point ;) Now I got some commits messages ...

Thank you Mattia ... I think we should also update our wiki pages

https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/DevelopPackaging
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/Join

best regards

mira​
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: salsa commits ML

[Mattia Rizzolo]

On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 07:29:11PM +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> 2018-01-31 12:16 GMT+01:00 James Cowgill :
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 31/01/18 11:02, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 09:32:09AM +, James Cowgill wrote:
> > >> pkg-multimedia-commits is dead now that things have been migrated to
> > salsa.
> > >>
> > >> For salsa you can:
> > >> - Join #debian-multimedia - all commits are sent there.
> > >> - Subscribe to a package on tracker.d.o and enable the "vcs" keyword.
> > >   - join the multimedia team on tracker: https://tracker.debian.org/
> > teams/debian-multimedia/
> > >
> > > Then you won't need subscribe to single packages.
> >
> > I remember trying this before, but tracker won't let me join the team
> > (or any teams at all it seems).

So there was also a bug that prevented joining a team if you had
multiple emails registered in tracker.  That's now fixed!
(this also means I couldn't test it myself up until now, although I was
part of a couple of teams I created and it works there).

> Hmm I have "join multimedia team" but I didn't received single commit
> message yet :(
> Also subscribe to all packages one by one is not what I like :( 
> I want to see all commits as I am learning from other's work.

Are you subscribed to the 'vcs' keywords?  Check out your subscriptions
default.

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: salsa commits ML

[James Cowgill]

Hi,

On 31/01/18 11:02, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 09:32:09AM +, James Cowgill wrote:
>> pkg-multimedia-commits is dead now that things have been migrated to salsa.
>>
>> For salsa you can:
>> - Join #debian-multimedia - all commits are sent there.
>> - Subscribe to a package on tracker.d.o and enable the "vcs" keyword.
>   - join the multimedia team on tracker: 
> https://tracker.debian.org/teams/debian-multimedia/
> 
> Then you won't need subscribe to single packages.

I remember trying this before, but tracker won't let me join the team
(or any teams at all it seems).

James



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: salsa commits ML

[Mattia Rizzolo]

On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 09:32:09AM +, James Cowgill wrote:
> pkg-multimedia-commits is dead now that things have been migrated to salsa.
> 
> For salsa you can:
> - Join #debian-multimedia - all commits are sent there.
> - Subscribe to a package on tracker.d.o and enable the "vcs" keyword.
  - join the multimedia team on tracker: 
https://tracker.debian.org/teams/debian-multimedia/

Then you won't need subscribe to single packages.

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: salsa git push problem

[Jaromír Mikeš]

2018-01-29 23:23 GMT+01:00 Mattia Rizzolo :

> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 11:14:26PM +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> > $ git push https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/lv2  master
> > --follow-tags
> > Username for 'https://salsa.debian.org': mira-guest
> > Password for 'https://mira-gu...@salsa.debian.org':
> > remote: You are not allowed to push code to this project.
> > fatal: unable to access 'https://salsa.debian.org/
> multimedia-team/lv2.git/':
> > The requested URL returned error: 403
> >
> > any idea what might be wrong?
>
> Of course, you weren't part of the team…
>
> Members have not been migrated, so you need to request access.
> I've now added you, so you should be able to push.
>
>
​Ohh ... this was real reason ... thank you Mattia

mira​
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: salsa git push problem

[Jaromír Mikeš]

2018-01-29 23:14 GMT+01:00 Jaromír Mikeš :

> Hi,
>
> I have problem to push commits to salsa repo ...
>
> $ git push https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/lv2  master
> --follow-tags
> Username for 'https://salsa.debian.org': mira-guest
> Password for 'https://mira-gu...@salsa.debian.org':
> remote: You are not allowed to push code to this project.
> fatal: unable to access 'https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/lv2.git/':
> The requested URL returned error: 403
>
> any idea what might be wrong?
> ​
>

​Aha ... i took couple of minutes to ssh key has been accepted ... now it
seems to ok ...

regards

mira​
​
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: salsa git push problem

[Mattia Rizzolo]

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 11:14:26PM +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> $ git push https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/lv2  master
> --follow-tags
> Username for 'https://salsa.debian.org': mira-guest
> Password for 'https://mira-gu...@salsa.debian.org':
> remote: You are not allowed to push code to this project.
> fatal: unable to access 'https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/lv2.git/':
> The requested URL returned error: 403
> 
> any idea what might be wrong?

Of course, you weren't part of the team…

Members have not been migrated, so you need to request access.
I've now added you, so you should be able to push.


BTW, ssh is consider nicer than https :P

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Bug#820901: Subject: Re: cantata: "Mark episodes as listened" in Podcasts doesn't work anymore [SOLVED]

[Volker Linke]

Package: cantata
Followup-For: Bug #820901

Dear Maintainer,

this bug is solved from the new upstream version in Sid.
Thanks.


-- 

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#888739: dbg package for kodi

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #888739 {Done: James Cowgill } [src:kodi] dbg package 
for kodi
Added tag(s) moreinfo.

-- 
888739: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=888739
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Proposed multimedia team migration to salsa.d.o

[Debian/GNU]

On 01/28/2018 06:17 PM, James Cowgill wrote:
>>> # Incorrect Package Naming
>>> My script requires repo name = source package name at the moment so
>>> these will be omitted. The pd-* repositories are special because they
>>> need to be put in a separate group. Should they intentionally not have
>>> the correct name - ie should "pd-lua" become "pd/lua" or "pd/pd-lua"?
>> Please, let's keep repo name = source package name.  So the package
>> 'pd-lua' should have a repo 'pd-lua', wherever group it is in.
> I think so, but I'll wait to see what umlaeute says because he pretty
> much owns all the pd-* packages.

oh totally: the repository should always match the package name, so that
would be https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/pd/pd-lua

gfsamrd
IOhannes



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Proposed multimedia team migration to salsa.d.o

[Ross Gammon]

Hi James,

Thanks for doing this.

multimedia-blends could do with a refresh, and it is a bit of a special case as 
the blends task (web) pages (https://blends.debian.org/multimedia/tasks/index) 
are generated from it. Lots would probably break if it was renamed. I will take 
care of it manually in the next few days.

Cheers,

Ross

On 01/28/2018 05:37 PM, James Cowgill wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 01/01/18 17:43, James Cowgill wrote:
>> Migration
>> ===
>> Migration of the maintainer email address can start immediately. New
>> packages can also immediately start hosting their VCS on salsa.debian.org.
>>
>> For existing packages, I propose:
>> - Wait until salsa.debian.org is declared stable (expected at the end of
>> January)
>> - Announce to the lists before migration starts
>> - Set all repositories on alioth read-only (eg using a git pre-receive hook)
>> - Migrate everything to salsa using Christoph Berg's import script:
>> http://www.df7cb.de/blog/2017/Salsa_batch_import.html
> Now that salsa is stable, I am going to start migrating things over. I
> wrote a separate script which also handles various integrations which I
> am going to use instead of the one above:
> https://salsa.debian.org/jcowgill/multimedia-cli
>
> One other change from the proposed plan is the addition of the
> "tagpending" webhook described here:
> https://wiki.debian.org/Salsa/Doc#Dealing_with_Debian_BTS_from_commit_messages
>
> I am also taking this opportunity to trim the repositories on alioth.
> The repositories below will be omitted from the initial import (but will
> still all be made read only). If I have screwed up and omitted a
> repository incorrectly, I can import them on a case-by-case basis or you
> can import them yourself.
>
> I have attached the final list of repositories I will attempt to import
> now (should be everything except the repos below).
>
> # Incorrect Package Naming
> My script requires repo name = source package name at the moment so
> these will be omitted. The pd-* repositories are special because they
> need to be put in a separate group. Should they intentionally not have
> the correct name - ie should "pd-lua" become "pd/lua" or "pd/pd-lua"?
>
> pd-*
>
> ffado
> invada-ladspa
> invada-lv2
> jconv
> libdvdcss-pkg
> libmusicbrainz
> lv2-tools
> multimedia-blends
> pd-iem_ambi
> qutecsound
> synfig-etl
> synfig-synfig
> synfig-synfigstudio
>
> # Dead repositories
> These repositories are not referenced in the Vcs-* fields of any
> package. I have tried to go through the list and remove some which
> simply omitted the Vcs- fields.
>
> 2mandvd
> adplug
> aften
> avidemux
> avldrums.lv2
> baka-mplayer
> bdsup2sub++
> beast
> bombono-dvd
> cadence
> cinelerra-cv
> clam-chordata
> clam-networkeditor
> collada2gltf
> creox
> deadbeef
> debimedia-archive-keyring
> divxenc
> dmedia
> dvbcut
> dvd95
> dvdrip
> dvdstyler
> dvdwizard
> earcandy
> ezstream
> ffmpegthumbnailer
> ffprobe
> flam3
> flumotion
> freecycle
> fst
> goattracker
> h264enc
> jack-rack
> jcgui
> jokosher
> kodi-addon-webinterface-chorus2
> kodiplatform
> lash
> libav-extra
> libcmrt
> libdvb
> libdvbpsi5
> libdvdcss
> libdvdcss-installer
> libfreebob
> libmkv
> libtunepimp
> libvisual
> libvisual-plugins
> linuxband
> linuxsampler
> lv2-extensions-good
> lv2fil
> madfuload
> morituri
> ntk
> ocp
> oomidi
> openmovieeditor
> openni-sensor-avin2-sensorkinect
> osceleton
> pd-extended
> pd-jmmmp
> permafrost
> phat
> plotmm
> portaudio
> portmidi
> redlandmm
> sayonara
> scenic
> specimen
> toonloop
> vgmstream
> vmpk
> whysynth
> xvidenc
> yafaray
> yafaray-exporter
> zita-dpl1
> zynjacku
>
> # Orphaned packages no longer maintained by multimedia team
> aj-snapshot
> gscanbus
> ino-headers
> libdv
> m2vrequantiser
> meterec
> mididings
> naspro-core
> pugl
> silan
> volti
>
> # Packages not maintained by multimedia team
> libcmrt
> # - Timo Aaltonen 
> libmediainfo
> # - Chow Loong Jin 
> libzen
> # - Chow Loong Jin 
> madfuload
> # - Free Ekanayaka 
> mediaconch
> # - Chow Loong Jin 
> mediainfo
> # - Chow Loong Jin 
>
> # Packages already existing on salsa
> collada2gltf
> ffmpeg
> gsequencer
> libplacebo
> rem
> smplayer
> vlc
>
> James
>
>
> ___
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Proposed multimedia team migration to salsa.d.o

[James Cowgill]

Hi,

On 28/01/18 16:56, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 04:37:36PM +, James Cowgill wrote:
>> Now that salsa is stable, I am going to start migrating things over. I
> 
> Thank you for doing the work!
> 
>> One other change from the proposed plan is the addition of the
>> "tagpending" webhook described here:
>> https://wiki.debian.org/Salsa/Doc#Dealing_with_Debian_BTS_from_commit_messages
> 
> Yes please.
> Thank you for adding that.  (btw, you didn't push that change into the
> git repo of your script)

Should be pushed now (along with some other stuff).

>> I am also taking this opportunity to trim the repositories on alioth.
>> The repositories below will be omitted from the initial import (but will
>> still all be made read only).
> 
> Can you please *move* the repositories that have been moved, instead of
> just making them read-only?  moving them to a MOVED_TO_SALSA directory
> should make the situation pretty clear.  I'm assuming we are going to
> remove them at some point (if nothing because I'd like to help avoid
> forcing the alioth admins to keep a huge snapshot once the host goes
> down).
> Of course, I'm assuming you are also going to open a MR to add http
> redirects from anonscm to salsa.

That seems reasonable. I'll move the repositories after the redirector
MR is merged.

>> # Incorrect Package Naming
>> My script requires repo name = source package name at the moment so
>> these will be omitted. The pd-* repositories are special because they
>> need to be put in a separate group. Should they intentionally not have
>> the correct name - ie should "pd-lua" become "pd/lua" or "pd/pd-lua"?
> 
> Please, let's keep repo name = source package name.  So the package
> 'pd-lua' should have a repo 'pd-lua', wherever group it is in.

I think so, but I'll wait to see what umlaeute says because he pretty
much owns all the pd-* packages.

Thanks,
James



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Proposed multimedia team migration to salsa.d.o

[Mattia Rizzolo]

On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 04:37:36PM +, James Cowgill wrote:
> Now that salsa is stable, I am going to start migrating things over. I

Thank you for doing the work!

> One other change from the proposed plan is the addition of the
> "tagpending" webhook described here:
> https://wiki.debian.org/Salsa/Doc#Dealing_with_Debian_BTS_from_commit_messages

Yes please.
Thank you for adding that.  (btw, you didn't push that change into the
git repo of your script)

> I am also taking this opportunity to trim the repositories on alioth.
> The repositories below will be omitted from the initial import (but will
> still all be made read only).

Can you please *move* the repositories that have been moved, instead of
just making them read-only?  moving them to a MOVED_TO_SALSA directory
should make the situation pretty clear.  I'm assuming we are going to
remove them at some point (if nothing because I'd like to help avoid
forcing the alioth admins to keep a huge snapshot once the host goes
down).
Of course, I'm assuming you are also going to open a MR to add http
redirects from anonscm to salsa.

> # Incorrect Package Naming
> My script requires repo name = source package name at the moment so
> these will be omitted. The pd-* repositories are special because they
> need to be put in a separate group. Should they intentionally not have
> the correct name - ie should "pd-lua" become "pd/lua" or "pd/pd-lua"?

Please, let's keep repo name = source package name.  So the package
'pd-lua' should have a repo 'pd-lua', wherever group it is in.

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Proposed multimedia team migration to salsa.d.o

[James Cowgill]

Hi,

On 01/01/18 17:43, James Cowgill wrote:
> Migration
> ===
> Migration of the maintainer email address can start immediately. New
> packages can also immediately start hosting their VCS on salsa.debian.org.
> 
> For existing packages, I propose:
> - Wait until salsa.debian.org is declared stable (expected at the end of
> January)
> - Announce to the lists before migration starts
> - Set all repositories on alioth read-only (eg using a git pre-receive hook)
> - Migrate everything to salsa using Christoph Berg's import script:
> http://www.df7cb.de/blog/2017/Salsa_batch_import.html

Now that salsa is stable, I am going to start migrating things over. I
wrote a separate script which also handles various integrations which I
am going to use instead of the one above:
https://salsa.debian.org/jcowgill/multimedia-cli

One other change from the proposed plan is the addition of the
"tagpending" webhook described here:
https://wiki.debian.org/Salsa/Doc#Dealing_with_Debian_BTS_from_commit_messages

I am also taking this opportunity to trim the repositories on alioth.
The repositories below will be omitted from the initial import (but will
still all be made read only). If I have screwed up and omitted a
repository incorrectly, I can import them on a case-by-case basis or you
can import them yourself.

I have attached the final list of repositories I will attempt to import
now (should be everything except the repos below).

# Incorrect Package Naming
My script requires repo name = source package name at the moment so
these will be omitted. The pd-* repositories are special because they
need to be put in a separate group. Should they intentionally not have
the correct name - ie should "pd-lua" become "pd/lua" or "pd/pd-lua"?

pd-*

ffado
invada-ladspa
invada-lv2
jconv
libdvdcss-pkg
libmusicbrainz
lv2-tools
multimedia-blends
pd-iem_ambi
qutecsound
synfig-etl
synfig-synfig
synfig-synfigstudio

# Dead repositories
These repositories are not referenced in the Vcs-* fields of any
package. I have tried to go through the list and remove some which
simply omitted the Vcs- fields.

2mandvd
adplug
aften
avidemux
avldrums.lv2
baka-mplayer
bdsup2sub++
beast
bombono-dvd
cadence
cinelerra-cv
clam-chordata
clam-networkeditor
collada2gltf
creox
deadbeef
debimedia-archive-keyring
divxenc
dmedia
dvbcut
dvd95
dvdrip
dvdstyler
dvdwizard
earcandy
ezstream
ffmpegthumbnailer
ffprobe
flam3
flumotion
freecycle
fst
goattracker
h264enc
jack-rack
jcgui
jokosher
kodi-addon-webinterface-chorus2
kodiplatform
lash
libav-extra
libcmrt
libdvb
libdvbpsi5
libdvdcss
libdvdcss-installer
libfreebob
libmkv
libtunepimp
libvisual
libvisual-plugins
linuxband
linuxsampler
lv2-extensions-good
lv2fil
madfuload
morituri
ntk
ocp
oomidi
openmovieeditor
openni-sensor-avin2-sensorkinect
osceleton
pd-extended
pd-jmmmp
permafrost
phat
plotmm
portaudio
portmidi
redlandmm
sayonara
scenic
specimen
toonloop
vgmstream
vmpk
whysynth
xvidenc
yafaray
yafaray-exporter
zita-dpl1
zynjacku

# Orphaned packages no longer maintained by multimedia team
aj-snapshot
gscanbus
ino-headers
libdv
m2vrequantiser
meterec
mididings
naspro-core
pugl
silan
volti

# Packages not maintained by multimedia team
libcmrt
# - Timo Aaltonen 
libmediainfo
# - Chow Loong Jin 
libzen
# - Chow Loong Jin 
madfuload
# - Free Ekanayaka 
mediaconch
# - Chow Loong Jin 
mediainfo
# - Chow Loong Jin 

# Packages already existing on salsa
collada2gltf
ffmpeg
gsequencer
libplacebo
rem
smplayer
vlc

James
a2jmidid
a52dec
abgate
ableton-link
advene
aeolus
aliki
alsaequal
amb-plugins
ambdec
ams
amsynth
ardour
ardour3
aribb24
atomicparsley
audacious
audacious-plugins
audacity
audiofile
autotalent
avw.lv2
azr3-jack
bitmeter
bitstream
blender
blepvco
bristol
brp-pacu
brutefir
bs1770gain
calf
camorama
cantata
caps
cecilia
chromaprint
clalsadrv
clam
clthreads
clxclient
cmt
cmus
composite
create-resources
crtmpserver
crystalhd
csound
csound-manual
csoundqt
das-watchdog
dataquay
deken
devede
dgedit
din
dino
dirac
directfb
drc
drumgizmo
drumkv1
dssi
dvblast
dvd-slideshow
easytag
ebumeter
ecasound
eq10q
faac
faad2
faust
faustworks
fdk-aac
ffdiaporama
ffmpeg2theora
ffms2
fil-plugins
flac
flactag
flake
flowblade
fluidsynth
fluidsynth-dssi
fomp
foo-yc20
forked-daapd
freetuxtv
frei0r
gavl
gecko-mediaplayer
gerbera
ghostess
giada
gigedit
gjacktransport
glyr
gmerlin
gmerlin-avdecoder
gmerlin-encoders
gmidimonitor
gmtk
gmusicbrowser
gnome-mplayer
gnome-mpv
gpac
groovebasin
gtklick
guayadeque
guitarix
gwc
gxtuner
handbrake
harvid
hexter
horgand
hydrogen
hydrogen-drumkits
iannix
icecast2
ices2
idjc
iem-plugin-suite
inkscape
intel-vaapi-driver
intel-vaapi-driver-shaders
ir.lv2
isrcsubmit
jaaa
jack-audio-connection-kit
jack-capture
jack-delay
jack-keyboard
jack-midi-clock
jack-mixer
jack-stdio
jack-tools
jackd-defaults
jackd2
jackeq
jackmeter
jacktrip
jalv
jamin
japa
jkmeter
jmeters
jnoise
jnoisemeter
jsusfx
juce

Processed: Re: Bug#888664: collada2gltf: missing Vcs-* fields

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 888664 + pending
Bug #888664 [src:collada2gltf] collada2gltf: missing Vcs-* fields
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #888664 to the same tags previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
888664: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=888664
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: [Audacity-devel] Bug#888332: audacity: FTBFS with FFmpeg 3.5

[James Cowgill]

Hi,

On 27/01/18 18:30, Paul Licameli wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 1:18 PM, Jaromír Mikeš  wrote:
>> 2018-01-26 21:00 GMT+01:00 Paul Licameli :
>>> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 2:51 PM, Darrell Walisser <
>>> darrell.walis...@gmail.com> wrote:
 On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 1:19 AM, Jaromír Mikeš 
 wrote:
> Hello audacity developers,
>
> current audacity release doesn't build with upcoming ffmpeg 3.5.
> As we in debian build audacity against system-wide ffmpeg it can be
> serious problem in near future
> and audacity might be removed from debian archive.
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=888332
>
> best regards
>
> mira
>
 ​I have a fix for this in progress. Hope this note avoids any
 duplication of effort.​
>>>
>>> That will be most welcome.
>>>
>>> Our intention is to release 2.2.2 beta very soon.  I hope Debian will
>>> allow us one more release to include Darrell's fixes.
>>>
>>> PRL
>>
>> ​Hi James,
>>
>> audacity devs already are working on ffmpep 3.5 support ​... but it will
>> not probably go to upcoming release.
>> When do you plan ffmpeg transition ?

It will definitely not happen before 3.5 is released upstream. After
that I would like to get the majority of the FTBFS bugs fixed before
starting the transition. My current guess is sometime in March or April.

> James, let me update that:
> 
> One of our contributors has already offered fixes for this, which was much
> less code than I feared.  It has not yet been merged into our master
> branch, but it is probable that it will be for version 2.2.2.  It should be
> compilable either with FFmpeg version 3.5 header files or earlier.  Please
> fetch this commit from his fork and see if it's good enough for your
> purposes.
> 
> https://github.com/audacity/audacity/pull/249/commits/3d173ccef08fe353d9c73ecdf897e7634803a2b4

Thanks. I made one comment on the pull request about handling older
FFmpeg versions correctly. Apart from that I think the PR is fine.

James



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: [Audacity-devel] Bug#888332: audacity: FTBFS with FFmpeg 3.5

[Paul Licameli]

On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 1:18 PM, Jaromír Mikeš  wrote:

>
>
> 2018-01-26 21:00 GMT+01:00 Paul Licameli :
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 2:51 PM, Darrell Walisser <
>> darrell.walis...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 1:19 AM, Jaromír Mikeš 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Hello audacity developers,

 current audacity release doesn't build with upcoming ffmpeg 3.5.
 As we in debian build audacity against system-wide ffmpeg it can be
 serious problem in near future
 and audacity might be removed from debian archive.

 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=888332

 best regards

 mira



>>> ​I have a fix for this in progress. Hope this note avoids any
>>> duplication of effort.​
>>>
>>
>> That will be most welcome.
>>
>> Our intention is to release 2.2.2 beta very soon.  I hope Debian will
>> allow us one more release to include Darrell's fixes.
>>
>> PRL
>>
>
> ​Hi James,
>
> audacity devs already are working on ffmpep 3.5 support ​... but it will
> not probably go to upcoming release.
> When do you plan ffmpeg transition ?
>
> best regards
>
> mira
>

James, let me update that:

One of our contributors has already offered fixes for this, which was much
less code than I feared.  It has not yet been merged into our master
branch, but it is probable that it will be for version 2.2.2.  It should be
compilable either with FFmpeg version 3.5 header files or earlier.  Please
fetch this commit from his fork and see if it's good enough for your
purposes.

https://github.com/audacity/audacity/pull/249/commits/3d173ccef08fe353d9c73ecdf897e7634803a2b4

PRL



>
>
> 
> --
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> ___
> audacity-devel mailing list
> audacity-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-devel
>
>
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: [Audacity-devel] Bug#888332: audacity: FTBFS with FFmpeg 3.5

[Jaromír Mikeš]

2018-01-26 21:00 GMT+01:00 Paul Licameli :

>
>
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 2:51 PM, Darrell Walisser <
> darrell.walis...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 1:19 AM, Jaromír Mikeš 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello audacity developers,
>>>
>>> current audacity release doesn't build with upcoming ffmpeg 3.5.
>>> As we in debian build audacity against system-wide ffmpeg it can be
>>> serious problem in near future
>>> and audacity might be removed from debian archive.
>>>
>>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=888332
>>>
>>> best regards
>>>
>>> mira
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ​I have a fix for this in progress. Hope this note avoids any duplication
>> of effort.​
>>
>
> That will be most welcome.
>
> Our intention is to release 2.2.2 beta very soon.  I hope Debian will
> allow us one more release to include Darrell's fixes.
>
> PRL
>

​Hi James,

audacity devs already are working on ffmpep 3.5 support ​... but it will
not probably go to upcoming release.
When do you plan ffmpeg transition ?

best regards

mira
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: ffmpeg 3.2.10 update

[James Cowgill]

Hi,

On 27/01/18 12:09, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 10:19:19AM +, James Cowgill wrote:
>> On 26/01/18 17:53, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 05:13:54PM +, James Cowgill wrote:
 I've pushed ffmpeg 3.2.10 here:
 https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/ffmpeg/tree/debian/stretch

 Since I've not been doing these updates before, what is the correct
 procedure. Do I just upload it to security-master, or should I contact
 the security team first?
>>>
>>> For ffmpeg (since it's following the 3.2.x series) uploading to
>>> security-master is fine (unless some update happens to provide
>>> changes in debian/ beyond the changelog, then please send us a
>>> debdiff).
>>
>> I've uploaded it and attached the debdiff. There are some minor
>> modifications to debian/ outside the changelog, but I don't think
>> they'll be controversial.
> 
> Something whent wrong, presumably the upload interupted?
> 
> The upload is missing the orig.tar.xz:
> 
> [...]
> Jan 27 10:20:39 processing /ffmpeg_3.2.10-1~deb9u1_source.changes
> Jan 27 10:20:39 ffmpeg_3.2.10.orig.tar.xz doesn't exist (ignored for now)
> Jan 27 10:25:39 processing /ffmpeg_3.2.10-1~deb9u1_source.changes
> Jan 27 10:25:39 ffmpeg_3.2.10.orig.tar.xz doesn't exist (ignored for now)
> [...]
> 
> You should be able to just push ffmpeg_3.2.10.orig.tar.xz in the next
> few hours, and the upload beeing processed.

Yeah I tried to do a manual upload because I was on a crap internet
connection and screwed it up, but I see everything is sorted now.

Thanks!
James



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: ffmpeg 3.2.10 update

[Salvatore Bonaccorso]

Hi James,

On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 10:19:19AM +, James Cowgill wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 26/01/18 17:53, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 05:13:54PM +, James Cowgill wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I've pushed ffmpeg 3.2.10 here:
> >> https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/ffmpeg/tree/debian/stretch
> >>
> >> Since I've not been doing these updates before, what is the correct
> >> procedure. Do I just upload it to security-master, or should I contact
> >> the security team first?
> > 
> > For ffmpeg (since it's following the 3.2.x series) uploading to
> > security-master is fine (unless some update happens to provide
> > changes in debian/ beyond the changelog, then please send us a
> > debdiff).
> 
> I've uploaded it and attached the debdiff. There are some minor
> modifications to debian/ outside the changelog, but I don't think
> they'll be controversial.

Something whent wrong, presumably the upload interupted?

The upload is missing the orig.tar.xz:

[...]
Jan 27 10:20:39 processing /ffmpeg_3.2.10-1~deb9u1_source.changes
Jan 27 10:20:39 ffmpeg_3.2.10.orig.tar.xz doesn't exist (ignored for now)
Jan 27 10:25:39 processing /ffmpeg_3.2.10-1~deb9u1_source.changes
Jan 27 10:25:39 ffmpeg_3.2.10.orig.tar.xz doesn't exist (ignored for now)
[...]

You should be able to just push ffmpeg_3.2.10.orig.tar.xz in the next
few hours, and the upload beeing processed.

Regards,
Salvatore

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: ffmpeg 3.2.10 update

[Moritz Mühlenhoff]

On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 05:13:54PM +, James Cowgill wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I've pushed ffmpeg 3.2.10 here:
> https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/ffmpeg/tree/debian/stretch
> 
> Since I've not been doing these updates before, what is the correct
> procedure. Do I just upload it to security-master, or should I contact
> the security team first?

For ffmpeg (since it's following the 3.2.x series) uploading to
security-master is fine (unless some update happens to provide
changes in debian/ beyond the changelog, then please send us a
debdiff).

Cheers,
Moritz



___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Proposed multimedia team migration to salsa.d.o

[Debian/GNU]

On 01/26/2018 11:22 AM, James Cowgill wrote:
>> has somebody started to work on that already?
> 
> I've had a go at writing a script in python which does some of this.
> I've put it here:
>  https://salsa.debian.org/jcowgill/multimedia-cli
> 

cool, thanks for sharing.

it still uses the "p-m-m@l.alioth.d.o" address address though.

fgarsm
IOhannes



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: ffmpeg 3.2.10 update

[James Cowgill]

dst[x] = av_clip_pixel(((EPEL_FILTER(src, srcstride) >> (BIT_DEPTH 
- 8)) * wx1 + src2[x] * wx0 +
-((ox0 + ox1 + 1) << log2Wd)) >> (log2Wd + 
1));
+((ox0 + ox1 + 1) * (1 << log2Wd))) >> 
(log2Wd + 1));
 src  += srcstride;
 dst  += dststride;
 src2 += MAX_PB_SIZE;
diff -Nru ffmpeg-3.2.9/libavcodec/j2kenc.c ffmpeg-3.2.10/libavcodec/j2kenc.c
--- ffmpeg-3.2.9/libavcodec/j2kenc.c2017-09-12 01:51:33.0 +0100
+++ ffmpeg-3.2.10/libavcodec/j2kenc.c   2018-01-13 02:33:15.0 +
@@ -688,7 +688,8 @@
 cblk->npasses = passno;
 cblk->ninclpasses = passno;
 
-cblk->passes[passno-1].rate = ff_mqc_flush_to(>mqc, 
cblk->passes[passno-1].flushed, >passes[passno-1].flushed_len);
+if (passno)
+cblk->passes[passno-1].rate = ff_mqc_flush_to(>mqc, 
cblk->passes[passno-1].flushed, >passes[passno-1].flushed_len);
 }
 
 /* tier-2 routines: */
diff -Nru ffmpeg-3.2.9/libavcodec/jpeg2000dsp.c 
ffmpeg-3.2.10/libavcodec/jpeg2000dsp.c
--- ffmpeg-3.2.9/libavcodec/jpeg2000dsp.c   2017-09-25 18:21:49.0 
+0100
+++ ffmpeg-3.2.10/libavcodec/jpeg2000dsp.c  2018-01-13 02:33:15.0 
+
@@ -64,9 +64,9 @@
 int i;
 
 for (i = 0; i < csize; i++) {
-i0 = *src0 + *src2 + (((26345 * *src2) + (1 << 15)) >> 16);
+i0 = *src0 + *src2 + ((int)((26345U * *src2) + (1 << 15)) >> 16);
 i1 = *src0 - ((int)(((unsigned)i_ict_params[1] * *src1) + (1 << 15)) 
>> 16)
-   - (((i_ict_params[2] * *src2) + (1 << 15)) >> 16);
+   - ((int)(((unsigned)i_ict_params[2] * *src2) + (1 << 15)) 
>> 16);
 i2 = *src0 + (2 * *src1) + ((int)((-14942U * *src1) + (1 << 15)) >> 
16);
 *src0++ = i0;
 *src1++ = i1;
diff -Nru ffmpeg-3.2.9/libavcodec/jpeglsdec.c 
ffmpeg-3.2.10/libavcodec/jpeglsdec.c
--- ffmpeg-3.2.9/libavcodec/jpeglsdec.c 2017-10-26 21:48:18.0 +0100
+++ ffmpeg-3.2.10/libavcodec/jpeglsdec.c2018-01-13 02:33:15.0 
+
@@ -233,6 +233,9 @@
 while (x < w) {
 int err, pred;
 
+if (get_bits_left(>gb) <= 0)
+return;
+
 /* compute gradients */
 Ra = x ? R(dst, x - stride) : R(last, x);
 Rb = R(last, x);
@@ -438,6 +441,10 @@
 avpriv_report_missing_feature(s->avctx, "Sample interleaved images");
 ret = AVERROR_PATCHWELCOME;
 goto end;
+} else { /* unknown interleaving */
+avpriv_report_missing_feature(s->avctx, "Unknown interleaved images");
+ret = AVERROR_PATCHWELCOME;
+goto end;
 }
 
 if (s->xfrm && s->nb_components == 3) {
diff -Nru ffmpeg-3.2.9/libavcodec/kgv1dec.c ffmpeg-3.2.10/libavcodec/kgv1dec.c
--- ffmpeg-3.2.9/libavcodec/kgv1dec.c   2016-06-27 00:54:29.0 +0100
+++ ffmpeg-3.2.10/libavcodec/kgv1dec.c  2018-01-13 02:33:15.0 +
@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@
 h = (buf[1] + 1) * 8;
 buf += 2;
 
+if (avpkt->size < 2 + w*h / 513)
+return AVERROR_INVALIDDATA;
+
 if (w != avctx->width || h != avctx->height) {
 av_freep(>frame_buffer);
 av_freep(>last_frame_buffer);
diff -Nru ffmpeg-3.2.9/libavcodec/libx264.c ffmpeg-3.2.10/libavcodec/libx264.c
--- ffmpeg-3.2.9/libavcodec/libx264.c   2017-10-26 21:48:18.0 +0100
+++ ffmpeg-3.2.10/libavcodec/libx264.c  2018-01-13 02:33:15.0 +
@@ -279,7 +279,11 @@
 
 x264_picture_init( >pic );
 x4->pic.img.i_csp   = x4->params.i_csp;
+#if X264_BUILD >= 153
+if (x4->params.i_bitdepth > 8)
+#else
 if (x264_bit_depth > 8)
+#endif
 x4->pic.img.i_csp |= X264_CSP_HIGH_DEPTH;
 x4->pic.img.i_plane = avfmt2_num_planes(ctx->pix_fmt);
 
@@ -490,6 +494,9 @@
 x4->params.p_log_private= avctx;
 x4->params.i_log_level  = X264_LOG_DEBUG;
 x4->params.i_csp= convert_pix_fmt(avctx->pix_fmt);
+#if X264_BUILD >= 153
+x4->params.i_bitdepth   = 
av_pix_fmt_desc_get(avctx->pix_fmt)->comp[0].depth;
+#endif
 
 PARSE_X264_OPT("weightp", wpredp);
 
@@ -878,6 +885,24 @@
 AV_PIX_FMT_NV20,
 AV_PIX_FMT_NONE
 };
+static const enum AVPixelFormat pix_fmts_all[] = {
+AV_PIX_FMT_YUV420P,
+AV_PIX_FMT_YUVJ420P,
+AV_PIX_FMT_YUV422P,
+AV_PIX_FMT_YUVJ422P,
+AV_PIX_FMT_YUV444P,
+AV_PIX_FMT_YUVJ444P,
+AV_PIX_FMT_NV12,
+    AV_PIX_FMT_NV16,
+#ifdef X264_CSP_NV21
+AV_PIX_FMT_NV21,
+#endif
+AV_PIX_FMT_YUV420P10,
+AV_PIX_FMT_YUV422P10,
+AV_PIX_FMT_YUV444P10,
+    AV_PIX_FMT_NV20,
+AV_PIX_FMT_NONE
+};
 #if CONFIG_LIBX264RGB_ENCODER
 static const enum AVPixelFormat pix_fmts_8bit_rgb[] = {
 AV_PIX_FMT_BGR0,
@@ -889,12 +914,16 @@
 
 static av_cold

Re: Proposed multimedia team migration to salsa.d.o

[James Cowgill]

Hi,

On 26/01/18 09:25, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:
> On 01/01/2018 06:43 PM, James Cowgill wrote:
>> we need to migrate things over to salsa
> 
> thanks for taking the initiative!
>>
>> New Vcs-* URLs:
>>
> 
> formorer has setup a redirection system, which would allow us to keep
> the old anonscm URLs, which i think should be preferred over re-setting
> the Vcs-* stanzas again.
> 
>https://salsa.debian.org/salsa/AliothRewriter

From the README of that project:
> The existance of this list should not mean that VCS control fields shouldn't 
> get updated with the next upload. This map is just a workaround - after your 
> upload please create another pull request that deletes the unneeded entries.

So it looks like it's just a workaround which may not exist forever. I
think we should change the VCS URLs (yet again). If we're going to
change the maintainer address anyway, I don't think it will be a huge
burden.
>> New maintainer address
>> ===
>> There is not going to be a replacement for alioth mailing lists, so we
>> are going to switch back to using "debian-multime...@lists.debian.org"
> 
> i haven't followed the discussion why d-m@l.d.o was deprecated in the
> first place.
> so for me, this sounds like a very good idea.
> 
>>
>> Commit notifications
>> ===
> 
> 
> there's also a webhook for closing/pending bugs which we probably want
> to enable.
> 
>   https://webhook.salsa.debian.org/tagpending/${pkgname}

Thanks I did not know about this..

>> Automation
>> ---
>> Enabling these should probably be automated and checked using the GitLab
>> API because inevitably someone will forget to enable it in a repository.
> 
> +1
> 
> has somebody started to work on that already?

I've had a go at writing a script in python which does some of this.
I've put it here:
 https://salsa.debian.org/jcowgill/multimedia-cli

I'll see if I can add the pending bugs webhook to it.

>> Migration
>> ===
>> - Migrate everything to salsa using Christoph Berg's import script:
>> http://www.df7cb.de/blog/2017/Salsa_batch_import.html
> 
> sounds good.
> the import script is quite rough though, has anybody worked on cleaning
> it up?

The above tool has an import script as well.

James



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Proposed multimedia team migration to salsa.d.o

[Debian/GNU]

On 01/01/2018 06:43 PM, James Cowgill wrote:
> we need to migrate things over to salsa

thanks for taking the initiative!
> 
> New Vcs-* URLs:
> 

formorer has setup a redirection system, which would allow us to keep
the old anonscm URLs, which i think should be preferred over re-setting
the Vcs-* stanzas again.

   https://salsa.debian.org/salsa/AliothRewriter



> New maintainer address
> ===
> There is not going to be a replacement for alioth mailing lists, so we
> are going to switch back to using "debian-multime...@lists.debian.org"

i haven't followed the discussion why d-m@l.d.o was deprecated in the
first place.
so for me, this sounds like a very good idea.

> 
> Commit notifications
> ===


there's also a webhook for closing/pending bugs which we probably want
to enable.

  https://webhook.salsa.debian.org/tagpending/${pkgname}



> 
> Automation
> ---
> Enabling these should probably be automated and checked using the GitLab
> API because inevitably someone will forget to enable it in a repository.

+1

has somebody started to work on that already?


> Migration
> ===
> - Migrate everything to salsa using Christoph Berg's import script:
> http://www.df7cb.de/blog/2017/Salsa_batch_import.html

sounds good.
the import script is quite rough though, has anybody worked on cleaning
it up?


fgmdsar
IOhannes



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#888315: blender: segfault on start

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> severity -1 important
Bug #888315 [blender] blender: segfault on start
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> tag -1 + moreinfo unreproducible
Bug #888315 [blender] blender: segfault on start
Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo.

-- 
888315: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=888315
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers