Re: qxgedit review
2015-09-29 14:59 GMT+02:00 Felipe Sateler: > On 29 September 2015 at 03:12, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >> 2015-06-15 16:30 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš : >>> 2015-05-14 1:50 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš : Hello, qxgedit is almost ready. I'm having this two warnings which I am not able currently fix ;( I would be happy if somebody would find a time to review a package and possibly upload. >>> >>> Nobody? :( >> >> Hi, >> >> qxgedit is updated to latest upstream version now. >> Can some DD upload it to NEW please? > > I can probably take a look during the weekend (hopefully earlier). > Please ping me again on friday or so if I haven't uploaded, so that I > don't forget. Ping ;) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: qxgedit review
On 2 October 2015 at 03:49, Jaromír Mikešwrote: > > 2015-09-29 14:59 GMT+02:00 Felipe Sateler : > > On 29 September 2015 at 03:12, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > >> 2015-06-15 16:30 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš : > >>> 2015-05-14 1:50 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš : > Hello, > > qxgedit is almost ready. > I'm having this two warnings which I am not able currently fix ;( > > I would be happy if somebody would find a time to review a package and > possibly upload. > >>> > >>> Nobody? :( > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> qxgedit is updated to latest upstream version now. > >> Can some DD upload it to NEW please? > > > > I can probably take a look during the weekend (hopefully earlier). > > Please ping me again on friday or so if I haven't uploaded, so that I > > don't forget. > > Ping ;) Uploaded! OT, I recently found out about the --follow-tags git push option, which helps not forgetting to push the tags :) -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: qxgedit review
Quoting Jaromír Mikeš (2015-10-02 18:04:15) > 2015-10-02 15:03 GMT+02:00 Felipe Sateler: >> OT, I recently found out about the --follow-tags git push option, >> which helps not forgetting to push the tags :) Ohh, cool! I wasn't aware of that one. > Hmm ... not sure if I am understanding advantage against --tags option :( > Can you explain pls? Problem with --tags is it pushes _all_ tags, also ones irrelevant for the the work being pushed (e.g. ones tied to upstream branches). -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: qxgedit review
On 2 October 2015 at 15:17, Jaromír Mikešwrote: > 2015-10-02 18:26 GMT+02:00 Jonas Smedegaard : >> Quoting Jaromír Mikeš (2015-10-02 18:04:15) >>> 2015-10-02 15:03 GMT+02:00 Felipe Sateler : OT, I recently found out about the --follow-tags git push option, which helps not forgetting to push the tags :) >> >> Ohh, cool! I wasn't aware of that one. >> >>> Hmm ... not sure if I am understanding advantage against --tags option :( >>> Can you explain pls? >> >> Problem with --tags is it pushes _all_ tags, also ones irrelevant for >> the the work being pushed (e.g. ones tied to upstream branches). > > Got it ;) > Than we should maybe use it rather than --tags option and edit our > wiki pages [1] > Should we change it in all cases? I think so. I don't see any reason why we should prefer using --tags rather than --follow-tags. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: qxgedit review
2015-10-02 20:23 GMT+02:00 Felipe Sateler: > On 2 October 2015 at 15:17, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >> 2015-10-02 18:26 GMT+02:00 Jonas Smedegaard : >>> Quoting Jaromír Mikeš (2015-10-02 18:04:15) 2015-10-02 15:03 GMT+02:00 Felipe Sateler : > OT, I recently found out about the --follow-tags git push option, > which helps not forgetting to push the tags :) >>> >>> Ohh, cool! I wasn't aware of that one. >>> Hmm ... not sure if I am understanding advantage against --tags option :( Can you explain pls? >>> >>> Problem with --tags is it pushes _all_ tags, also ones irrelevant for >>> the the work being pushed (e.g. ones tied to upstream branches). >> >> Got it ;) >> Than we should maybe use it rather than --tags option and edit our >> wiki pages [1] >> Should we change it in all cases? > > I think so. I don't see any reason why we should prefer using --tags > rather than --follow-tags. Felipe can you please suggest this change in separate mail in our ML? So the topic wouldn't be missed by others and we can see if there will be some objections. regards mira ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: qxgedit review
2015-10-02 18:26 GMT+02:00 Jonas Smedegaard: > Quoting Jaromír Mikeš (2015-10-02 18:04:15) >> 2015-10-02 15:03 GMT+02:00 Felipe Sateler : >>> OT, I recently found out about the --follow-tags git push option, >>> which helps not forgetting to push the tags :) > > Ohh, cool! I wasn't aware of that one. > >> Hmm ... not sure if I am understanding advantage against --tags option :( >> Can you explain pls? > > Problem with --tags is it pushes _all_ tags, also ones irrelevant for > the the work being pushed (e.g. ones tied to upstream branches). Got it ;) Than we should maybe use it rather than --tags option and edit our wiki pages [1] Should we change it in all cases? mira [1]https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/DevelopPackaging ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: qxgedit review
2015-06-15 16:30 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš: > 2015-05-14 1:50 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš : >> Hello, >> >> qxgedit is almost ready. >> I'm having this two warnings which I am not able currently fix ;( >> >> I would be happy if somebody would find a time to review a package and >> possibly upload. > > Nobody? :( Hi, qxgedit is updated to latest upstream version now. Can some DD upload it to NEW please? best regards mira ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: qxgedit review
2015-09-29 14:59 GMT+02:00 Felipe Sateler: > On 29 September 2015 at 03:12, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >> 2015-06-15 16:30 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš : >>> 2015-05-14 1:50 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš : Hello, qxgedit is almost ready. I'm having this two warnings which I am not able currently fix ;( I would be happy if somebody would find a time to review a package and possibly upload. >>> >>> Nobody? :( >> >> Hi, >> >> qxgedit is updated to latest upstream version now. >> Can some DD upload it to NEW please? > > I can probably take a look during the weekend (hopefully earlier). > Please ping me again on friday or so if I haven't uploaded, so that I > don't forget. I will remind you in that case ;) Thank you Felipe. mira ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: qxgedit review
On 29 September 2015 at 03:12, Jaromír Mikešwrote: > 2015-06-15 16:30 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš : >> 2015-05-14 1:50 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš : >>> Hello, >>> >>> qxgedit is almost ready. >>> I'm having this two warnings which I am not able currently fix ;( >>> >>> I would be happy if somebody would find a time to review a package and >>> possibly upload. >> >> Nobody? :( > > Hi, > > qxgedit is updated to latest upstream version now. > Can some DD upload it to NEW please? I can probably take a look during the weekend (hopefully earlier). Please ping me again on friday or so if I haven't uploaded, so that I don't forget. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: qxgedit review
2015-05-14 1:50 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com: Hello, qxgedit is almost ready. I'm having this two warnings which I am not able currently fix ;( I would be happy if somebody would find a time to review a package and possibly upload. Nobody? :( mira ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: qxgedit review
2015-05-31 19:55 GMT+02:00 Ross Gammon r...@the-gammons.net: On 05/14/2015 01:50 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: Hello, qxgedit is almost ready. I'm having this two warnings which I am not able currently fix ;( I: qxgedit: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/bin/qxgedit W: qxgedit: hardening-no-relro usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt4/plugins/styles/libskulpturestyle.so I would be happy if somebody would find a time to review a package and possibly upload. Sorry - I have been a little busy over the last week. No problem ;) I had done a review a while back, and made a couple of tweaks which I just pushed. Awesome. I tried a few tricks, but couldn't solve the hardening issue either. I need a little bit more time to study the upstream build system. Yes hardening can be sometimes tricky ;) Thank you for trying! regards mira ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: qxgedit review
On 05/14/2015 01:50 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: Hello, qxgedit is almost ready. I'm having this two warnings which I am not able currently fix ;( I: qxgedit: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/bin/qxgedit W: qxgedit: hardening-no-relro usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt4/plugins/styles/libskulpturestyle.so I would be happy if somebody would find a time to review a package and possibly upload. Hi mira, Sorry - I have been a little busy over the last week. I had done a review a while back, and made a couple of tweaks which I just pushed. I tried a few tricks, but couldn't solve the hardening issue either. I need a little bit more time to study the upstream build system. Cheers, Ross signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: qxgedit review
2015-05-31 21:39 GMT+02:00 James Cowgill james...@cowgill.org.uk: On Sun, 2015-05-31 at 19:55 +0200, Ross Gammon wrote: On 05/14/2015 01:50 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: Hello, qxgedit is almost ready. I'm having this two warnings which I am not able currently fix ;( I: qxgedit: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/bin/qxgedit Hi James, configure.ac messes the flags up a bit (uses CFLAGS for C++ files, modifies CPPFLAGS but never uses it). Adding this to debian/rules will fix it, but upstream should sort their configure script out: export DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND := $(shell dpkg-buildflags --get CPPFLAGS) W: qxgedit: hardening-no-relro usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt4/plugins/styles/libskulpturestyle.so Add this to skulpture/skulpture.pri.in (copied from src/src.pri.in). # Extra optimization flags QMAKE_CXXFLAGS += @ac_cflags@ QMAKE_LFLAGS += @ac_ldflags@ thank you for help! best regards mira ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: qxgedit review
Hi, On Sun, 2015-05-31 at 19:55 +0200, Ross Gammon wrote: On 05/14/2015 01:50 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: Hello, qxgedit is almost ready. I'm having this two warnings which I am not able currently fix ;( I: qxgedit: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/bin/qxgedit configure.ac messes the flags up a bit (uses CFLAGS for C++ files, modifies CPPFLAGS but never uses it). Adding this to debian/rules will fix it, but upstream should sort their configure script out: export DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND := $(shell dpkg-buildflags --get CPPFLAGS) W: qxgedit: hardening-no-relro usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt4/plugins/styles/libskulpturestyle.so Add this to skulpture/skulpture.pri.in (copied from src/src.pri.in). # Extra optimization flags QMAKE_CXXFLAGS += @ac_cflags@ QMAKE_LFLAGS += @ac_ldflags@ James signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: qxgedit review
So if anybody is interested ... I think package is ready for review and upload. best regards mira 2015-05-31 23:21 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com: 2015-05-31 21:39 GMT+02:00 James Cowgill james...@cowgill.org.uk: On Sun, 2015-05-31 at 19:55 +0200, Ross Gammon wrote: On 05/14/2015 01:50 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: Hello, qxgedit is almost ready. I'm having this two warnings which I am not able currently fix ;( I: qxgedit: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/bin/qxgedit Hi James, configure.ac messes the flags up a bit (uses CFLAGS for C++ files, modifies CPPFLAGS but never uses it). Adding this to debian/rules will fix it, but upstream should sort their configure script out: export DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND := $(shell dpkg-buildflags --get CPPFLAGS) W: qxgedit: hardening-no-relro usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt4/plugins/styles/libskulpturestyle.so Add this to skulpture/skulpture.pri.in (copied from src/src.pri.in). # Extra optimization flags QMAKE_CXXFLAGS += @ac_cflags@ QMAKE_LFLAGS += @ac_ldflags@ thank you for help! best regards mira ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers