Re: rtkit diff in Ubuntu
On 22 October 2015 at 09:56, Felipe Satelerwrote: > On 21 October 2015 at 11:28, Martin Pitt wrote: >> Hey Felipe, >> >> Felipe Sateler [2015-10-18 12:52 -0300]: >>> It took me a while to do this, but I've finally uploaded a rtkit that >>> can be (I think) synced back to ubuntu. I also had to apply the rt >>> linkage fix. If anything remains, please let me know! >> >> Thanks for this! The only remaining delta is now that >> debian/patches/ubuntu.series still has old patch names >> (01-no_ptrace_cap.patch and configure.patch) which don't actually >> exist, and is missing some patches. >> >> But in fact, the Debian and Ubuntu patches are now exactly the same, >> so if you could just completely kill debian/patches/ubuntu.series, we >> would be in perfect sync again. > > Huh, I thought I did. I guess since my build just ignored it, I didn't notice. > > I don't think I can do this in the next few days, but I've added this > to my TODO. NMUs or team uploads welcome! OK, I uploaded a new version nuking the ubuntu.series file. We should be able to sync now. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: rtkit diff in Ubuntu
Hello Felipe, Felipe Sateler [2015-10-25 18:27 -0300]: > OK, I uploaded a new version nuking the ubuntu.series file. We should > be able to sync now. Great, many thanks! Martin -- Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: rtkit diff in Ubuntu
On 21 October 2015 at 11:28, Martin Pittwrote: > Hey Felipe, > > Felipe Sateler [2015-10-18 12:52 -0300]: >> It took me a while to do this, but I've finally uploaded a rtkit that >> can be (I think) synced back to ubuntu. I also had to apply the rt >> linkage fix. If anything remains, please let me know! > > Thanks for this! The only remaining delta is now that > debian/patches/ubuntu.series still has old patch names > (01-no_ptrace_cap.patch and configure.patch) which don't actually > exist, and is missing some patches. > > But in fact, the Debian and Ubuntu patches are now exactly the same, > so if you could just completely kill debian/patches/ubuntu.series, we > would be in perfect sync again. Huh, I thought I did. I guess since my build just ignored it, I didn't notice. I don't think I can do this in the next few days, but I've added this to my TODO. NMUs or team uploads welcome! -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: rtkit diff in Ubuntu
Hey Felipe, Felipe Sateler [2015-10-18 12:52 -0300]: > It took me a while to do this, but I've finally uploaded a rtkit that > can be (I think) synced back to ubuntu. I also had to apply the rt > linkage fix. If anything remains, please let me know! Thanks for this! The only remaining delta is now that debian/patches/ubuntu.series still has old patch names (01-no_ptrace_cap.patch and configure.patch) which don't actually exist, and is missing some patches. But in fact, the Debian and Ubuntu patches are now exactly the same, so if you could just completely kill debian/patches/ubuntu.series, we would be in perfect sync again. Thank you! Martin -- Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org) signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: rtkit diff in Ubuntu
Hi again, On 3 May 2015 at 20:10, Luke Yelavichwrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:01:47PM AEST, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> On 28 April 2015 at 11:07, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> > On 28 April 2015 at 10:32, Martin Pitt wrote: >> >> Hey Felipe, >> >> >> >> Felipe Sateler [2015-04-24 18:25 -0300]: >> >>> I see that rtkit has diverged in Ubuntu. Should debian incorporate the >> >>> patch added to check for mq_getattr? Why is it necessary? >> >> >> >> TBH I don't know; I figure back then it failed to build with >> >> -Wl,--as-needed (as we have in Ubuntu by default) because it forgot to >> >> link against -lrt, but this doesn't happen on current 15.04. So I >> >> figure we can drop this patch. >> >> >> >> So if you could also apply the unfuzzing of 01-no_ptrace_cap.patch in >> >> Debian, I think we would be back in sync. >> > >> > Ok, I will do that for the next upload. I will request a sync when I >> > do so pointing to this discussion. >> >> Hmm, so 01-no_ptrace_cap.patch is not applied by debian. Maybe we >> should apply it as well? If so we should also probably drop the >> CAP_SYS_PTRACE from the systemd unit. >> >> Luke, why did you add this patch? The ubuntu changelog does not give >> hints as to why it is there... > > As per the Ubuntu main inclusion request bug, > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396396 the Ubuntu security team requested it > be removed. > > I also believe it was originally in the changelog when the Ubuntu package was > created, but that changelog entry was lost when Debian took the diff, and the > package was synced. It took me a while to do this, but I've finally uploaded a rtkit that can be (I think) synced back to ubuntu. I also had to apply the rt linkage fix. If anything remains, please let me know! -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: rtkit diff in Ubuntu
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:01:47PM AEST, Felipe Sateler wrote: On 28 April 2015 at 11:07, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote: On 28 April 2015 at 10:32, Martin Pitt mp...@debian.org wrote: Hey Felipe, Felipe Sateler [2015-04-24 18:25 -0300]: I see that rtkit has diverged in Ubuntu. Should debian incorporate the patch added to check for mq_getattr? Why is it necessary? TBH I don't know; I figure back then it failed to build with -Wl,--as-needed (as we have in Ubuntu by default) because it forgot to link against -lrt, but this doesn't happen on current 15.04. So I figure we can drop this patch. So if you could also apply the unfuzzing of 01-no_ptrace_cap.patch in Debian, I think we would be back in sync. Ok, I will do that for the next upload. I will request a sync when I do so pointing to this discussion. Hmm, so 01-no_ptrace_cap.patch is not applied by debian. Maybe we should apply it as well? If so we should also probably drop the CAP_SYS_PTRACE from the systemd unit. Luke, why did you add this patch? The ubuntu changelog does not give hints as to why it is there... As per the Ubuntu main inclusion request bug, https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396396 the Ubuntu security team requested it be removed. I also believe it was originally in the changelog when the Ubuntu package was created, but that changelog entry was lost when Debian took the diff, and the package was synced. Luke ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: rtkit diff in Ubuntu
On 28 April 2015 at 11:07, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote: On 28 April 2015 at 10:32, Martin Pitt mp...@debian.org wrote: Hey Felipe, Felipe Sateler [2015-04-24 18:25 -0300]: I see that rtkit has diverged in Ubuntu. Should debian incorporate the patch added to check for mq_getattr? Why is it necessary? TBH I don't know; I figure back then it failed to build with -Wl,--as-needed (as we have in Ubuntu by default) because it forgot to link against -lrt, but this doesn't happen on current 15.04. So I figure we can drop this patch. So if you could also apply the unfuzzing of 01-no_ptrace_cap.patch in Debian, I think we would be back in sync. Ok, I will do that for the next upload. I will request a sync when I do so pointing to this discussion. Hmm, so 01-no_ptrace_cap.patch is not applied by debian. Maybe we should apply it as well? If so we should also probably drop the CAP_SYS_PTRACE from the systemd unit. Luke, why did you add this patch? The ubuntu changelog does not give hints as to why it is there... -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: rtkit diff in Ubuntu
Hey Felipe, Felipe Sateler [2015-04-24 18:25 -0300]: I see that rtkit has diverged in Ubuntu. Should debian incorporate the patch added to check for mq_getattr? Why is it necessary? TBH I don't know; I figure back then it failed to build with -Wl,--as-needed (as we have in Ubuntu by default) because it forgot to link against -lrt, but this doesn't happen on current 15.04. So I figure we can drop this patch. So if you could also apply the unfuzzing of 01-no_ptrace_cap.patch in Debian, I think we would be back in sync. Thank you! Martin -- Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
rtkit diff in Ubuntu
Hi Martin, I see that rtkit has diverged in Ubuntu. Should debian incorporate the patch added to check for mq_getattr? Why is it necessary? -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers