Bug#795718: marked as done (Don't include libav in stretch)
Your message dated Sat, 29 Aug 2015 13:40:28 + with message-id e1zvgmu-0003qu...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#796272: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #795718, regarding Don't include libav in stretch to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 795718: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=795718 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: libav Severity: serious It was decided to switch to ffmpeg for stretch and it's now in testing. Please remove libav from testing (or rather from unstable unless someone wants to continue to maintain it in unstable/experimental only) Cheers, Moritz ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 6:11.4-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package libav has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/796272 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)---End Message--- ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#769862: marked as done (libav: target option broken - leads to wrong output files)
Your message dated Sat, 29 Aug 2015 13:40:28 + with message-id e1zvgmu-0003qu...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#796272: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #769862, regarding libav: target option broken - leads to wrong output files to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 769862: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=769862 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: libav Version: 11 Severity: normal Tags: upstream This bug was reported upstream by someone else 1.5 year back, with note on how to simply fix it, but the problem persists. This breaks eg DVD production flow, as the encoding profiles produce non-compliant output files. Workaround is to re-enter all associated options, but this is an annoying regression (not seen in FFmpeg). Thanks for taking this into account! -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable'), (50, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 6:11.4-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package libav has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/796272 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)---End Message--- ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#704070: marked as done (ffmpeg: obsolete-conffile as reported by adequate)
Your message dated Sat, 29 Aug 2015 13:40:28 + with message-id e1zvgmu-0003qu...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#796272: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #704070, regarding ffmpeg: obsolete-conffile as reported by adequate to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 704070: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704070 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: ffmpeg Version: 6:0.8.5-1 Severity: important Usertags: conffile Usertags: obsolete-conffile adequate Dear Maintainer, Adequate reported an obsolete-conffile in ffmpeg. Please fix it. $ adequate ffmpeg ffmpeg: obsolete-conffile /etc/ffserver.conf -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (10, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_IN.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_IN.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages ffmpeg depends on: ii libav-tools6:9.4-1 ii libavcodec53 6:0.8.5-1 ii libavdevice53 6:9.4-1 ii libavfilter2 6:0.8.5-1 ii libavformat53 6:0.8.5-1 ii libavutil516:0.8.5-1 ii libc6 2.17-0experimental2 ii libpostproc52 6:0.git20120821-2 ii libswscale26:9.4-1 ffmpeg recommends no packages. ffmpeg suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 6:11.4-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package libav has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/796272 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)---End Message--- ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#774814: marked as done (libav: use build profiles to break circular dependencies)
Your message dated Sat, 29 Aug 2015 13:40:28 + with message-id e1zvgmu-0003qu...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#796272: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #774814, regarding libav: use build profiles to break circular dependencies to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 774814: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=774814 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: libav Version: 6:11~beta1-2 Severity: important Justification: blocker for kde builds X-Debbugs-CC: Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.de When I try building libav in an x32 schroot (without the build dependencies on frei0r, opencv, x264 which have also all failed to build on x32), I get this: ... /tmp/libav/libav-11~beta1/libswscale/x86/swscale_template.c: Assembler messages: /tmp/libav/libav-11~beta1/libswscale/x86/swscale_template.c:798: Error: operand type mismatch for `push' /tmp/libav/libav-11~beta1/libswscale/x86/swscale_template.c:860: Error: operand type mismatch for `push' /tmp/libav/libav-11~beta1/libswscale/x86/swscale_template.c:861: Error: operand type mismatch for `push' ... /tmp/libav/libav-11~beta1/libswscale/x86/swscale_template.c:1380: Error: operand type mismatch for `pop' /tmp/libav/libav-11~beta1/Makefile:44: recipe for target 'libswscale/x86/swscale.o' failed make[1]: *** [libswscale/x86/swscale.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/libav/libav-11~beta1/debian-static' debian/rules:81: recipe for target 'build-stamp-static' failed make: *** [build-stamp-static] Error 2 rm configure-stamp-static dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 I'm attaching the debdiff I'm using for an upload to debian-ports/unreleased. You can ignore the debian/control part, and as the debian/rules changes could be considered a horrible hack, I'm not tagging this as patch. -- Daniel Schepler diff -Nru libav-11~beta1/debian/changelog libav-11~beta1/debian/changelog --- libav-11~beta1/debian/changelog 2014-08-30 08:02:45.0 -0700 +++ libav-11~beta1/debian/changelog 2014-09-03 20:32:53.0 -0700 @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +libav (6:11~beta1-2+x32) unreleased; urgency=low + + * Bootstrap for x32 without cyclic dependencies on frei0r, opencv, +x264 (all of which have previously failed to build on x32, anyway). + * Set --arch='x32' instead of --arch='amd64' for x32 builds as the +inline assembly fails to build. + + -- Daniel Schepler schep...@debian.org Wed, 03 Sep 2014 20:32:47 -0700 + libav (6:11~beta1-2) unstable; urgency=medium [ Reinhard Tartler ] diff -Nru libav-11~beta1/debian/confflags libav-11~beta1/debian/confflags --- libav-11~beta1/debian/confflags 2014-08-10 10:17:38.0 -0700 +++ libav-11~beta1/debian/confflags 2014-09-03 20:31:38.0 -0700 @@ -95,7 +95,11 @@ endef # Common configuration flags +ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),x32) +confflags += --arch='x32' +else confflags += --arch='$(DEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU)' +endif confflags += --enable-pthreads confflags += --enable-runtime-cpudetect confflags += --extra-version='$(DEB_VERSION)' @@ -114,6 +118,10 @@ confflags += --enable-pic endif +ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),x32) +confflags += --enable-pic +endif + # Additional features confflags += $(call cond_enable,/usr/include/bzlib.h,bzlib) confflags += $(call cond_enable,/usr/include/dc1394/dc1394.h,libdc1394) diff -Nru libav-11~beta1/debian/control libav-11~beta1/debian/control --- libav-11~beta1/debian/control 2014-08-30 08:01:33.0 -0700 +++ libav-11~beta1/debian/control 2014-09-03 20:30:01.0 -0700 @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ doxygen Build-Depends: debhelper (= 9), - frei0r-plugins-dev, + frei0r-plugins-dev [!x32], libasound2-dev [linux-any], libbz2-dev, libcdio-cdda-dev, @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ libmp3lame-dev, libopencore-amrnb-dev, libopencore-amrwb-dev, - libopencv-dev, + libopencv-dev [!x32], libopenjpeg-dev, libopus-dev (= 1.0.1), libpulse-dev, @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ libvorbis-dev, libvpx-dev, libx11-dev, - libx264-dev, + libx264-dev [!x32], libxext-dev, libxfixes-dev, libxvidcore-dev, ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 6:11.4-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package libav has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/796272 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was
Bug#760433: marked as done (libav: FTBFS on x32: Invalid inline assembly)
Your message dated Sat, 29 Aug 2015 13:40:28 + with message-id e1zvgmu-0003qu...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#796272: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #760433, regarding libav: FTBFS on x32: Invalid inline assembly to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 760433: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=760433 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: libav Version: 6:11~beta1-2 Severity: important Justification: blocker for kde builds X-Debbugs-CC: Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.de When I try building libav in an x32 schroot (without the build dependencies on frei0r, opencv, x264 which have also all failed to build on x32), I get this: ... /tmp/libav/libav-11~beta1/libswscale/x86/swscale_template.c: Assembler messages: /tmp/libav/libav-11~beta1/libswscale/x86/swscale_template.c:798: Error: operand type mismatch for `push' /tmp/libav/libav-11~beta1/libswscale/x86/swscale_template.c:860: Error: operand type mismatch for `push' /tmp/libav/libav-11~beta1/libswscale/x86/swscale_template.c:861: Error: operand type mismatch for `push' ... /tmp/libav/libav-11~beta1/libswscale/x86/swscale_template.c:1380: Error: operand type mismatch for `pop' /tmp/libav/libav-11~beta1/Makefile:44: recipe for target 'libswscale/x86/swscale.o' failed make[1]: *** [libswscale/x86/swscale.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/libav/libav-11~beta1/debian-static' debian/rules:81: recipe for target 'build-stamp-static' failed make: *** [build-stamp-static] Error 2 rm configure-stamp-static dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 I'm attaching the debdiff I'm using for an upload to debian-ports/unreleased. You can ignore the debian/control part, and as the debian/rules changes could be considered a horrible hack, I'm not tagging this as patch. -- Daniel Schepler diff -Nru libav-11~beta1/debian/changelog libav-11~beta1/debian/changelog --- libav-11~beta1/debian/changelog 2014-08-30 08:02:45.0 -0700 +++ libav-11~beta1/debian/changelog 2014-09-03 20:32:53.0 -0700 @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +libav (6:11~beta1-2+x32) unreleased; urgency=low + + * Bootstrap for x32 without cyclic dependencies on frei0r, opencv, +x264 (all of which have previously failed to build on x32, anyway). + * Set --arch='x32' instead of --arch='amd64' for x32 builds as the +inline assembly fails to build. + + -- Daniel Schepler schep...@debian.org Wed, 03 Sep 2014 20:32:47 -0700 + libav (6:11~beta1-2) unstable; urgency=medium [ Reinhard Tartler ] diff -Nru libav-11~beta1/debian/confflags libav-11~beta1/debian/confflags --- libav-11~beta1/debian/confflags 2014-08-10 10:17:38.0 -0700 +++ libav-11~beta1/debian/confflags 2014-09-03 20:31:38.0 -0700 @@ -95,7 +95,11 @@ endef # Common configuration flags +ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),x32) +confflags += --arch='x32' +else confflags += --arch='$(DEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU)' +endif confflags += --enable-pthreads confflags += --enable-runtime-cpudetect confflags += --extra-version='$(DEB_VERSION)' @@ -114,6 +118,10 @@ confflags += --enable-pic endif +ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),x32) +confflags += --enable-pic +endif + # Additional features confflags += $(call cond_enable,/usr/include/bzlib.h,bzlib) confflags += $(call cond_enable,/usr/include/dc1394/dc1394.h,libdc1394) diff -Nru libav-11~beta1/debian/control libav-11~beta1/debian/control --- libav-11~beta1/debian/control 2014-08-30 08:01:33.0 -0700 +++ libav-11~beta1/debian/control 2014-09-03 20:30:01.0 -0700 @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ doxygen Build-Depends: debhelper (= 9), - frei0r-plugins-dev, + frei0r-plugins-dev [!x32], libasound2-dev [linux-any], libbz2-dev, libcdio-cdda-dev, @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ libmp3lame-dev, libopencore-amrnb-dev, libopencore-amrwb-dev, - libopencv-dev, + libopencv-dev [!x32], libopenjpeg-dev, libopus-dev (= 1.0.1), libpulse-dev, @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ libvorbis-dev, libvpx-dev, libx11-dev, - libx264-dev, + libx264-dev [!x32], libxext-dev, libxfixes-dev, libxvidcore-dev, ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 6:11.4-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package libav has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/796272 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated
Bug#738760: marked as done (libav: Add proper raspberry pi CPU detection)
Your message dated Sat, 29 Aug 2015 13:40:28 + with message-id e1zvgmu-0003qu...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#796272: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #738760, regarding libav: Add proper raspberry pi CPU detection to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 738760: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=738760 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: libav Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, Current libav debian build script don't detect raspberry pi CPU properly and detect CPU with ARM NEON future Raspbian maintainer patch it with simply comment line with NEON But I think you can do it much better and raspbian distro will be able to use your build packages as it is Thx -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.2 Architecture: armhf (armv6l) Kernel: Linux 3.10.25+ (PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 6:11.4-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package libav has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/796272 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)---End Message--- ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#787834: marked as done (libavcodec56: segfault when using vlc to view a long video (a film))
Your message dated Sat, 29 Aug 2015 13:40:28 + with message-id e1zvgmu-0003qu...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#796272: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #787834, regarding libavcodec56: segfault when using vlc to view a long video (a film) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 787834: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=787834 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: libavcodec56 Version: 6:11.4-1 Severity: normal Hi, I'm using VLC from testing to view a long video (a film). At some random point during the playback VLC crash and the only thing I can see is this: vlc[23301]: segfault at 7fcab13f5000 ip 7fcabcff7967 sp 7fcad707e818 error 4 in libavcodec.so.56.1.0[7fcabcae8000+735000] My vlc version: 2.2.1-1+b3 -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=es_ES.utf8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages libavcodec56 depends on: ii libavresample2 6:11.4-1 ii libavutil546:11.4-1 ii libc6 2.19-18 ii libgsm11.0.13-4 ii libmp3lame03.99.5+repack1-7 ii libopenjpeg5 1:1.5.2-3.1 ii libopus0 1.1-2 ii libschroedinger-1.0-0 1.0.11-2.1 ii libspeex1 1.2~rc1.2-1 ii libtheora0 1.1.1+dfsg.1-6 ii libva1 1.5.1-2 ii libvorbis0a1.3.4-2 ii libvorbisenc2 1.3.4-2 ii libvpx21.4.0-3 ii libx264-1462:0.146.2538+git121396c-2 ii libx265-59 1.7-2 ii libxvidcore4 2:1.3.3-1 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.8.dfsg-2+b1 libavcodec56 recommends no packages. libavcodec56 suggests no packages. -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 6:11.4-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package libav has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/796272 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)---End Message--- ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#781812: marked as done (Set AV_DISPOSITION_ATTACHED_PIC for MKV Cover Art)
Your message dated Sat, 29 Aug 2015 13:40:28 + with message-id e1zvgmu-0003qu...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#796272: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #781812, regarding Set AV_DISPOSITION_ATTACHED_PIC for MKV Cover Art to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 781812: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=781812 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: minidlna Version: 1.1.4+dfsg-2 minidlna does not support Cover Art as stored in Matroska file. Steps: Go to: http://matroska.org/technical/cover_art/index.html Download sample: $ wget https://sourceforge.net/projects/matroska/files/test_files/cover_art.mkv ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 6:11.4-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package libav has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/796272 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)---End Message--- ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#788609: marked as done (libavutils: Please add channel support to AVFrame)
Your message dated Sat, 29 Aug 2015 13:40:28 + with message-id e1zvgmu-0003qu...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#796272: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #788609, regarding libavutils: Please add channel support to AVFrame to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 788609: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788609 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: libavutil-dev Version: 6:11.3-1 File: /usr/include/libavutil/frame.h Severity: wishlist Hi. I am working on getting the bs1770gain program into Debian, and in the process I discovered an incompatibility between libavutil-dev and libavutil-ffmpeg-dev. The latter provide information about the auto channels in an audio file, using AVFrame struct member channel_layout and channels. These make it possible to handle surround audio. There are also the new functions av_frame_set_channel_layout() av_frame_get_channel_layout() av_frame_set_channels() and av_frame_get_channels() needed for this. Please consider porting this new API to libav from the ffmpeg library. -- Happy hacking Petter Reinholdtsen ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 6:11.4-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package libav has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/796272 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)---End Message--- ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#773993: marked as done (avprobe loops endlessly on certain FLAC files)
Your message dated Sat, 29 Aug 2015 13:40:28 + with message-id e1zvgmu-0003qu...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#796272: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #773993, regarding avprobe loops endlessly on certain FLAC files to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 773993: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773993 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: libavcodec56 Version: 6:11-2 Severity: important Download the following file: http://farragut.drunkensailor.org:5/track2.flac Then run avprobe on it. libavcodec will loop endlessly. This library bug is important because you can use it for a denial-of-service attack against remotly accessible services like MPD. Upstream bug report on MPD: http://bugs.musicpd.org/view.php?id=3384 ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 6:11.4-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package libav has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/796272 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)---End Message--- ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#796272: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libav | 6:11.4-2 | source libav-dbg | 6:11.4-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x libav-doc | 6:11.4-2 | all libavcodec-extra | 6:11.4-2 | all libavcodec-extra-56 | 6:11.4-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x libavcodec56 | 6:11.4-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x libavdevice55 | 6:11.4-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x libavfilter5 | 6:11.4-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x libavformat56 | 6:11.4-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x libavresample2 | 6:11.4-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x libavutil54 | 6:11.4-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x libswscale3 | 6:11.4-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x --- Reason --- ROM; outdated, replaced by ffmpeg -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 796...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/796272 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#796272: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 6:11.4-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package libav has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/796272 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
gmtk REMOVED from testing
FYI: The status of the gmtk source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.0.9-2 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: Package not in unstable The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals. -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
gecko-mediaplayer REMOVED from testing
FYI: The status of the gecko-mediaplayer source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.0.9-2 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: Package not in unstable The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals. -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processing of cecilia_5.2.0-1_amd64.changes
cecilia_5.2.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: cecilia_5.2.0-1.dsc cecilia_5.2.0.orig.tar.gz cecilia_5.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz cecilia_5.2.0-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processing of cecilia_5.2.0-1_amd64.changes
cecilia_5.2.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: cecilia_5.2.0-1.dsc cecilia_5.2.0.orig.tar.gz cecilia_5.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz cecilia_5.2.0-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#779690: marked as done (cecilia: can't open anymore)
Your message dated Sat, 29 Aug 2015 18:05:30 + with message-id e1zvkvo-00072n...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#779690: fixed in cecilia 5.2.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #779690, regarding cecilia: can't open anymore to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 779690: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=779690 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: cecilia Version: 5.0.9-1.1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, i can not open cecilia it throws error, here is the traceback Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/wx-3.0-gtk2/wx/_misc.py, line 1367, in Notify self.notify() File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/wx-3.0-gtk2/wx/_core.py, line 16866, in Notify self.result = self.callable(*self.args, **self.kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/cecilia/Resources/splash.py, line 75, in OnClose self.callback() File /usr/bin/cecilia, line 68, in onStart ceciliaMainFrame.onOpen(os.path.join(MODULES_PATH, category, file), True) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/cecilia/Resources/CeciliaMainFrame.py, line 236, in onOpen CeciliaLib.openCeciliaFile(self, event, builtin) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/cecilia/Resources/CeciliaLib.py, line 584, in openCeciliaFile getVar(audioServer).openCecFile(cecFilePath) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/cecilia/Resources/audio.py, line 1660, in openCecFile CeciliaLib.getVar(mainFrame).onUpdateInterface(None) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/cecilia/Resources/CeciliaMainFrame.py, line 326, in onUpdateInterface
gnome-mplayer REMOVED from testing
FYI: The status of the gnome-mplayer source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.0.9-3 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: Package not in unstable The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals. -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
libdvdread 5.0.3-1 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the libdvdread source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 5.0.0-1 Current version: 5.0.3-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
cecilia_5.2.0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2015 09:14:30 -0400 Source: cecilia Binary: cecilia Architecture: source all Version: 5.2.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: Tiago Bortoletto Vaz ti...@debian.org Description: cecilia- Sound synthesis and audio signal processing environment Closes: 779690 Changes: cecilia (5.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release. * Fix wx3 compatibility issues. (Closes: #779690) * Add dh-python to Build-depends. * Fix patches. * Update Standards-Version. Checksums-Sha1: f0997dd2ebc97d4dfea27fd78a002f1f9c1b5fd1 1999 cecilia_5.2.0-1.dsc 4c59ecd742aebadbdbcfb3bcedcbd13e2ad8a40d 2739732 cecilia_5.2.0.orig.tar.gz d0f81ed9a926d2b1b08614e5adbad6ed957fa729 8640 cecilia_5.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz 7d6f9a64031cc2b56ee862691d78e835458271d4 1107718 cecilia_5.2.0-1_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: c706362452a6cc94d404993feeae15306f4bf97bde050d2e4453170c24eae41d 1999 cecilia_5.2.0-1.dsc 335f7224faa835390c9148ba7e8048ec6fcb6bb4a08a3c77b7b749fa1957e6fc 2739732 cecilia_5.2.0.orig.tar.gz 1fba04d4f6eaf4674c54d2efd09b347e2afbca570846951bf18ed47ae391dded 8640 cecilia_5.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz 3de0779702d9a6a52b9b75351468c42221f22e18bce4f0f2381f2139361d62cd 1107718 cecilia_5.2.0-1_all.deb Files: 921663005fc0ddbdc22681e5d96716be 1999 sound optional cecilia_5.2.0-1.dsc a5899764d285f5955266ed3ec5023415 2739732 sound optional cecilia_5.2.0.orig.tar.gz 94f1d896f181aeb054f109756aad4c33 8640 sound optional cecilia_5.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz 52deffd2e9ccbc4aaef94b7931a22760 1107718 sound optional cecilia_5.2.0-1_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJV4e+pAAoJENhHR6zktoE9slIQAJCxlHT3wItHEJFpi/L8NRGB BI9J36G7iDIfvuS42ISs9UvKVV6/LQIo/ll8i02+x780VBZEC+aHOdCCD/QHfwxo 8Xc1UjsETe/GztpmDRbou1ibg+jV8cGLpZRVR0mMiMxX4vv/6lvJUjHgz9zlXaQv +v9KcUIeZQSaN8Fw0mgUg8WXVL0DTCwcxRikculMEgoVJQJpAw/R2gb5uTU3quJ1 Jh5LOR2wUI6JQdfqlbcnOcx8tfbx3f0owwYRFBtxt2nMwhSm2joaoNpDLoIThMD3 bjzWbbjJYy7gQ4MRLaGu94I/52J3fwgDK12lfEbEDtzx75qNiLtc7rptlDpOO+4c 6mBVJYqjiUdYQl0IeYIpkMNhTYw0q4zNcLZ2pyEcK/gKRTxqqVwLj3ErLnu5wUWV szs2EykkQelgHzbI8c/WqWG1w4QX4FGYF82PnIlNC7eb/bDHBs2CsbTL2NtFpoq8 Dx+MyCd74bM7ezEyD3gsQIH+2WUyUKwbatxnLPgHkFgGGKCMLIbnT+YEyVG4ELRS ksIcXD2K+iF56qveb0+XB7b24EeF24fTKJlJ8PYCIFp8dcZtr60ioOzPrp9Dhmya axC/Wkii1Gb68QkkWv1VjST9j9owUu00iMl+NlnIiT1lXtf7YdhMWe6S0EhLZ6ks YOr4LoiSC0GyMlaytjoJ =SRUr -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Potential removal - python-irc
Hi, I've been taking a look through the QA team's packages and I found the version of python-irc in unstable to be considerably behind the upstream version. I understand that the reason this cannot be updated is a new dependency has been introduced that will require packaging an additional Python library. Only three packages in Debian appear to depend on python-irc: Dependent maintainers for python-irc: Ben Armstrong sy...@sanctuary.nslug.ns.ca (xpilot-ng-common) Debian Python Modules Team python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org (python-cobe) Debian Multimedia Maintainers pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org (idjc) I'm not familiar with these packages that are depending on python-irc, but if you would like to continue to have them depend on python-irc, please update bug #730084. As this package is now almost 2 years behind upstream and has been orphaned for a considerable time, I may request removal of this package unless I hear otherwise from you. Thanks, Iain. -- e: i...@fsfe.orgw: iain.learmonth.me x: i...@jabber.fsfe.org t: EPVPN 2105 c: 2M0STB g: IO87we p: 1F72 607C 5FF2 CCD5 3F01 600D 56FF 9EA4 E984 6C49 pgp9iPn1XFYYg.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: The blender Package
Hello again, After reading many documents, I think I'd like to start gaining practical experience. So, naturally, I began trying to upgrade the blender package to the newest upstream version, 2.75a. It's proving a bit of a challenge, however; If you don't mind taking a moment, I have some questions regarding this package specifically: - 'git tag' shows me that the various versions (upstream/version and debian/version) are maintained by tag, as opposed to by branch (as the git-buildpackage docs seem to be teaching me). 'gbp import-orig uscan' seems to read debian/watch fine, but demands an 'upstream' branch, which should obviously be an upstream/version tag as per the structure at the moment. *So my question is this*: What tools do I use/how do I maintain the current package structure, with tagged upstream/debian versions, ideally while still utilizing time-savers like debian/watch? - I did manage to update using uscan normally (do I, perhaps, simply tag this?), and ran 'while dquilt push; do dquilt refresh; done' (dquilt is an alias to quilt, except it points to ./debian/patches); all the patches seem to have (I don't *actually* know) applied correctly from what I can see with 'dquilt diff'. Then, using a tar'ed version of blender's upstream git repository (with v2.75a checked out), named 'blender_2.75a.orig.tar.gz', I tried to run 'dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc'. It ran fine, right until the patches. The error is below: patching file blender.thumbnailer patching file release/bin/blender-thumbnailer.py patching file source/creator/CMakeLists.txt Hunk #1 FAILED at 484. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED dpkg-source: info: the patch has fuzz which is not allowed, or is malformed dpkg-source: info: if patch '0001-blender_thumbnailer.patch' is correctly applied by quilt, use 'quilt refresh' to update it dpkg-source: error: LC_ALL=C patch -t -F 0 -N -p1 -u -V never -E -b -B .pc/0001-blender_thumbnailer.patch/ --reject-file=- blender.orig.HjNuiS/debian/patches/0001-blender_thumbnailer.patch gave error exit status 1 dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b blender gave error exit status 2 - ...Which is strange, considering the dquilt refresh I ran on all the packages. I have searched, and I have no idea what is going on. *So my question is this*: What is going on, and how do I fix it? - I noticed that a diff between CMakeLists.txt of the 'uscan' updated Debian version (before patches) and the original source was quite long... My question holds! - Finally, a bit of an etiquette question (which I couldn't locate in the Debian Policy manual): Say I wanted to add a Danish (my second language) translation to the package description in blender.desktop, which is part of the '0006-blender_desktop.patch' patch. How do I handle the patch header? Do I treat it like a changelog, putting my changes over, or do I make an entirely new header, inputting my changes? Most importantly, is there a tool that takes care of it for me (I noticed that there's a list of changes, insertions, and deletions in each header)? Thanks for your time! Sofus Rose www.sofusrose.com On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Sofus Rose so...@sofusrose.com wrote: Hello, All right, so it seems like my task is to lean how everything works with those three documents (a bit of light reading... :) ), along with picking apart the git repository. I'll get back to you in a few days, once I get a better grip on things! Thanks for the assistance, Sofus Rose PS. His name is Kristoffer Rose. I think he only recently became active again. On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Matteo F. Vescovi m...@debian.org wrote: Hi! On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Sofus Rose so...@sofusrose.com wrote: Hello, I am an avid user of Debian, but more importantly a frequent user of the blender package that you maintain. I am, however, looking to start contributing to the Debian project. In short, I am interested in helping to keep the blender package up to date with regards to upstream. Though I have no prior experience with Debian packaging, I build Blender frequently from source. For my own development, I code mainly in Python and C++. For general packaging, I have an in-house Debian Developer that can assist me. For the specifics of Blender packaging, I hope you'll consider taking the time to explain them to me! I'm very glad to see that there is someone interested in helping the Team (and me in particular) with the packaging of Blender. It's not particularly difficult, once you've learnt how it works. So, at this point, the better advice I could give you is to take some time and read the main packaging documents that are available on the Debian Developers' Corner, that is the Debian Policy, Developer Reference and New Maintainer's Guide. At the same time, you can clone the git repository of Blender in Debian and see if it makes
