[DRE-maint] ruby-gettext-i18n-rails-js_1.3.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, please take care of: E: ruby-gettext-i18n-rails-js source: source-is-missing vendor/assets/javascripts/gettext/jed.js line length is 2360 characters (>512) and mention all licenses/copyright information of vendor/assets/javascripts/gettext/jed.js in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-asciidoctor-plantuml_0.0.7-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, the copyright holder does not seem to match the Author. Is this intentionally? Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-openssl_2.0.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
requested by maintainer .. === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-secure-headers_3.5.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, please add all copyright holders to your debian/copyright, Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-string-direction_1.2.0-1_amd64.changes
Hi, I marked your package for accept, but: License: GPL-3 and the term or (at your option) any later version. in the license text do not really match. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] rubocop_0.47.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Miguel, according to README.md: rubocop-0.47.0/README.md:The logo is licensed under a rubocop-0.47.0/README.md:[Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.en_GB). rubocop-0.47.0/README.md:Copyright (c) 2012-2017 Bozhidar Batsov. See [LICENSE.txt](LICENSE.txt) for which is not compatible with DFSG. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] rubocop_0.46.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
same as other version ... === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] schleuder-cli_0.0.1~beta13-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Georg, as the license of this software is only GPL-3, the term "or (at your option) any later version." should not be present in the corresponding license block of your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] tdiary-style-gfm_0.4.0-2_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, according to tdiary-style-gfm-0.4.0/tdiary-style-gfm.gemspec the license is MIT!? Anyway, the GPL-3+ in your debian/copyright should be better only GPL-3. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] tdiary-style-gfm_0.4.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
same as other version === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-prof_0.15.9+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, please mention the files licensed under the Open Font License in your debian/coypright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-prof_0.15.9+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
as requested by mail ... === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] vagrant-sshfs_1.2.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Hans, can you please explain why you say in your debian/copyright that this software is licensed under GPL-2+? All I found in the source tarball is a reference to GPL-2 only!? Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-sys-filesystem_1.1.7-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, the software is licensed under Artistic 2.0, but in your debian/copyright you refer to the Artistic 1.0 license in /usr/share/common-licenses. I am afraid that does not match, so please add the Artistic 2 license text to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-hamlit_2.5.0+debian-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, sorry, but: ruby-hamlit-2.5.0+debian/ext/hamlit/houdini/buffer.* seem to be licensed under GPL-2 and should be mentioned in your debian/coypright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-hamlit_2.5.0+debian-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, please mention ruby-hamlit-2.5.0+debian/ext/hamlit/houdini/buffer.* in your debian/coypright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-fog-azure_0.0.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, according to the file headers the copyright belongs to Microsoft and not to the authors. Can you please change your debian/copyright accordingly? Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-azure-core_0.1.2-1_amd64.changes
This package has the same Apache license issue .. Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-jquery-datatables-rails_3.3.0.dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Andrew, unfortunately I have to reject your package. The license of jquery-datatables-rails-3.3.0/app/assets/stylesheets/dataTables/extras/dataTables.tableTools.scss should be mentioned in your debian/copyright. Further the metadata of some pictures: jquery-datatables-rails-3.3.0/app/assets/images/dataTables/extras/*.png contain something like: Made on a Mac! Exclusive for Smashing Magazine! Copyright 2009 by Oliver Twardowsk I am afraid those may not be distributed by Debian. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] tdiary-theme_4.2.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, unfortunately I have to reject your package. According to the file headers some files are licensed under Apache-2. Please mention them in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-premailer_1.8.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, some files premailer-1.8.6/test/files/*.css: just contain a copyright but no license information: * Copyright (c) 2009 Dialect Communications Group (dialect.ca) Please check with upstream whether the BSD-3 license is also valid for them. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-foreigner_1.7.4-2_amd64.changes REJECTED
as requested on irc === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] Bug#812103: CVE-2015-7519
Hi Linus,
as others might be interested in the answer as well, I also send it to
debian-lts@.
On irc you wrote:
15:05 < Nirkus> have some old redmine running on squeeze-lts (yeah..) and
since the update yesterday the following redmine code bails out with
"private method `split' called for nil:NilClass" at the following line:
15:06 < Nirkus> @env['QUERY_STRING'].present? ? @env['QUERY_STRING'] :
(@env['REQUEST_URI'].split('?', 2)[1] || '')
15:11 < Nirkus> ah, the code is actually from: libactionpack-ruby1.8:
/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/action_controller/request.rb
15:51 < Nirkus> downgrading to libapache2-mod-passenger=2.2.11debian-2
fixes the above issue...
In CVE-2015-7519[1] it was detected, that it is possible to obtain
unauthorized access if you send http variables with "_" instead of "-".
More information can be found here[2]. As a solution it was proposed to
simply filter out all variables containing an "_". This was already done
in mod_cgi of apache[3] and now I applied a similar patch to
libapache2-mod-passenger as well.
Unfortunately there seems to be software that relies on underscores in
variable names. So if you need such variables you might want to use the
workaround for apache, described in[2].
Thorsten
[1] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-7519
[2] https://blog.phusion.nl/2015/12/07/cve-2015-7519/
[3]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/201010.mbox/<201010121630.19406@apache.org>
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-rbpdf_1.19.0-1_amd64.changes
Hi Antonio, I marked the package for accept, but please add rbpdf-1.19.0/rbpdf-font/lib/fonts/ttf2ufm/* to the LGPL license block in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-sentry-raven_0.15.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, raven-ruby-0.15.3/lib/raven/okjson.rb is not licensed under Apache-2 Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-reek_3.8.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Andrew, please mention the license of reek-3.8.2/spec/samples/redcloth.rb in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-minitar_0.5.4-1_amd64.changes
Hi Markus, I marked the package for accept, but according to README the software is dual licensed, so please mention the Ruby-license in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-thinking-sphinx_3.1.4-2_amd64.changes
Hi Andrew, your package depends on 'builder'. Can you please tell me where I can find this? Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-codemirror-rails_5.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Andrew, please take care of these lintian errors: E: ruby-codemirror-rails source: source-is-missing vendor/assets/javascripts/codemirror/modes/clojure.js E: ruby-codemirror-rails source: source-is-missing vendor/assets/javascripts/codemirror/modes/cypher.js E: ruby-codemirror-rails source: source-is-missing vendor/assets/javascripts/codemirror/modes/ecl.js E: ruby-codemirror-rails source: source-is-missing vendor/assets/javascripts/codemirror/modes/gherkin.js E: ruby-codemirror-rails source: source-is-missing vendor/assets/javascripts/codemirror/modes/mumps.js E: ruby-codemirror-rails source: source-is-missing vendor/assets/javascripts/codemirror/modes/nginx.js E: ruby-codemirror-rails source: source-is-missing vendor/assets/javascripts/codemirror/modes/php.js E: ruby-codemirror-rails source: source-is-missing vendor/assets/javascripts/codemirror/modes/q.js E: ruby-codemirror-rails source: source-is-missing vendor/assets/javascripts/codemirror/modes/scheme.js E: ruby-codemirror-rails source: source-is-missing vendor/assets/javascripts/codemirror/modes/sql.js E: ruby-codemirror-rails source: source-is-missing vendor/assets/javascripts/codemirror/modes/stylus.js E: ruby-codemirror-rails source: source-is-missing vendor/assets/javascripts/codemirror/modes/swift.js E: ruby-codemirror-rails source: source-is-missing vendor/assets/javascripts/codemirror/addons/hint/html-hint.js You should also mention all copyright holders in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] diff for passenger in Squeeze
Hi everybody,
can someone please have a look at the diff for passenger=2.2.11debian-2 in
Squeeze that should solve CVE-2015-7519[1] and nod?
Thanks!
Thorsten
[1] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-7519
diff -Nru passenger-2.2.11debian/ext/apache2/Hooks.cpp
passenger-2.2.11debian/ext/apache2/Hooks.cpp
--- passenger-2.2.11debian/ext/apache2/Hooks.cpp2010-03-05
10:35:16.0 +0100
+++ passenger-2.2.11debian/ext/apache2/Hooks.cpp2015-12-28
20:04:14.0 +0100
@@ -779,9 +779,33 @@
char *lookupEnv(request_rec *r, const char *name) {
return lookupName(r->subprocess_env, name);
}
+
+ static bool
+ isAlphaNum(char ch) {
+ return (ch >= '0' && ch <= '9') || (ch >= 'a' && ch <= 'z') || (ch >= 'A'
&& ch <= 'Z');
+ }
+
+ /**
+* For CGI, alphanum headers with optional dashes are mapped to
UPP3R_CAS3. This
+* function can be used to reject non-alphanum/dash headers that would
end up with
+* the same mapping (e.g. upp3r_cas3 and upp3r-cas3 would end up the
same, and
+* potentially collide each other in the receiving application). This is
+* used to fix CVE-2015-7519.
+*/
+ static bool
+ containsNonAlphaNumDash(const char *s) {
+ size_t len = strlen(s);
+ for (size_t i = 0; i < len; i++) {
+ const char start = s[i];
+ if (start != '-' && !isAlphaNum(start)) {
+ return true;
+ }
+ }
+ return false;
+ }
void inline addHeader(apr_table_t *table, const char *name, const char
*value) {
- if (name != NULL && value != NULL) {
+ if ((name != NULL && value != NULL) ||
containsNonAlphaNumDash(name)) {
apr_table_addn(table, name, value);
}
}
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
Re: [DRE-maint] ruby-email-reply-parser_0.5.8-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015, Pirate Praveen wrote: Upstream has responded "They're both correct." Great, thanks alot for taking care of this. Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-state-machines-activerecord_0.3.0-1_amd64.changes
Hi, I marked your package for accept, but it would be great to add the correct copyright-years to your debian/coypright. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-paranoia_2.1.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, please use the license text from the LICENSE file in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-email-reply-parser_0.5.8-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, please check with upstream whether the copyright holder from the LICENSE file or from metadata.yml is the correct one. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-totoridipjp_0.1.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
as requested by email === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-json-schema_2.5.1-1_amd64.changes
Hi, I marked your package for accept, but please add the copyright holders of lib/json-schema/util/uuid.rb to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-minitest-utils_0.2.4+debian-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Neither in the source tarball, nor on the homepage I could find any license information for that package. So how do you know that it is licensed under Expat? Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-rails-assets-colorbox_1.6.3-1_amd64.changes
Hi, libjs-jquery-colorbox is already in the archive. So why don't you use that and maybe update it? Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-ridley_4.2.0-1_amd64.changes
Hi Miguel, I marked your package for accept, but please add Opscode Inc as a copyright holder for some files to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-saml_0.9.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, unfortunately you forgot some licenses in your debian/copyright. Please add: ruby-saml-0.9.2/lib/schemas/xmldsig-core-schema.xsd ruby-saml-0.9.2/lib/xml_security.rb Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-binding-of-caller_0.7.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, I found files that are licensed under BSD-2. Other files are written by different authors but have no license information. Please clarify this with upstream. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-debug-inspector_0.0.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, please clarify the license of ext\debug_inspector\debug_inspector.c At least Yukihiro Matsumoto should appear in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-diaspora-federation_0.0.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Sorry, but policy says full text in debian/coypright. Pointers are only allowed to common-licenses. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-diaspora-federation-rails_0.0.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Sorry, but policy says full text in debian/coypright. Pointers are only allowed to common-licenses. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-diaspora-federation_0.0.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, unfortunately the AGPL does not belong to the licenses in /usr/share/common-licenses. So please add the full license text to your debian/copyright Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-ace-rails-ap_3.0.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, please add the missing license of ace-rails-ap-3.0.3/vendor/assets/javascripts/ace/ace.js to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-diaspora-federation-rails_0.0.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Sorry, same AGPL-reason as the other package ... Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-open-graph-reader_0.5.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
same reason as other version === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-open-graph-reader_0.6.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi I would say that something containing this line: div class=copyrightCopyright 2014 a href=http://anticlown.com/;Anticlown Media/a. All rights reserved./div is not really suitable for main. So, please remove open_graph_reader-0.6.1/spec/fixtures/real_world/missing_title.html Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
Re: [DRE-maint] ruby-rails-assets-highlightjs_8.6.0~dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015, Pirate Praveen wrote: added and uploaded. But I don't think giving full code is required. hmm, but it did not arrive here!? So as per the license requirement, giving a hyperlink to full text was enough. That is true, but policy 12.5 wants to have the verbatim version. Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-rails-assets-highlightjs_8.6.0~dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, almost done, but the license of rails-assets-highlightjs-8.6.0~dfsg/app/assets/stylesheets/highlightjs/kimbie.* still seems to be missing. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-rails-assets-highlightjs_8.6.0~dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the missing licenses of app/assets/stylesheets/highlightjs/* to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-rqrcode-rails3_0.1.5-1_amd64.changes
Hi, I marked your package for accept, but you should add all copyright holders to your debian/copyright. Especially those from files in test/* are missing ... Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] squeeze update of rails?
Hello dear maintainer(s), the Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are currently open in the Squeeze version of rails: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-3226 https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-3227 Would you like to take care of this yourself? We are still understaffed so any help is always highly appreciated. If yes, please follow the workflow we have defined here: http://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Development If that workflow is a burden to you, feel free to just prepare an updated source package and send it to debian-...@lists.debian.org (via a debdiff, or with an URL pointing to the the source package, or even with a pointer to your packaging repository), and the members of the LTS team will take care of the rest. Indicate clearly whether you have tested the updated package or not. If you don't want to take care of this update, it's not a problem, we will do our best with your package. Just let us know whether you would like to review and/or test the updated package before it gets released. Thank you very much. Thorsten Alteholz, on behalf of the Debian LTS team. PS: A member of the LTS team might start working on this update at any point in time. You can verify whether someone is registered on this update in this file: https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/secure-testing/data/dla-needed.txt?view=markup ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
Re: [DRE-maint] squeeze update of rails?
On Sun, 5 Jul 2015, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: That doesn't make sense, rails is EOLed in squeeze... Oh, sorry for the noise, it seems to be too hot over here ... Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-backbone-on-rails_1.1.2.0-1_amd64.changes
Hi, I marked the package for accept, but you forgot to mention the copyright holders of vendor/assets/javascripts/* Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-backbone-on-rails_1.1.2.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, as there is no progress here, I assume a typo in the Depends:-line. So please reupload a corrected version. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-cleanroom_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes
Hi Hleb, I marked your package for accept, but why did you do that lintian override? As you didn't close an ITP bug, the lintian warning is rather correct. Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] vagrant-lxc_1.1.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Antonio, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please mention the missing license of scripts/lxc-template in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] Comments regarding rexical_1.0.5-1_amd64.changes
Hi, I marked your package for accept, but please add the LGPL-2+ license of lib\rexical\generator.rb to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-simple-captcha2_0.3.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Neither on the website nor in the metadata I could find any license information. So this software does not seem to be distributable. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
Re: [DRE-maint] ruby-backbone-on-rails_1.1.2.0-1_amd64.changes is NEW
On Wed, 27 May 2015, Pirate Praveen wrote: This package has been in NEW for 6 months. Can you review this? Sure, I am waiting for two dependencies: ruby-jquety-rails and ruby-eco Can you please tell me where I can find them? (and the icing on the cake would be to mention the copyright holders of vendor/assets/javascripts/*) Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-rails-assets-diaspora-jsxc_0.0.9~dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please mention the dual license of jquery.slimscroll.js in your debian/copyright. strophe.disco.js just mentions a new copyright holder but no license. This needs to be clarified. Your package also depends on libjs-jsxc. Can you please tell me where I can find this? Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-fog-terremark_0.0.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
please reupload to experimental === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-fog-profitbricks_0.0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
please reupload to experimental === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] diaspora-installer needs to go to contrib
Hi, as your package diaspora-installer downloads other stuff in postinst, it needs to go to contrib. Sorry, for overlooking this. Can you please reupload your package? Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-rails-assets-jquery-idletimer_1.0.1-1_amd64.changes
Dear Maintainer, I marked your package for accept, but some files are dual licensed under GPL as well. Please add those to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-rails-assets-jquery.slimscroll_1.3.3~dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the missing license of: app\assets~.slimscroll\examples\libs\prettify\prettify.js to your debian/coypright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-rails-assets-jquery-fullscreen_1.1.4~dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the missing license of: app\assets~avascripts\jquery-fullscreen\externs\jquery.js to your debian/copyight. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-mini-exiftool_2.5.0-1_amd64.changes
Dear Maintainer, I marked your package for accept, but as the license is pure LGPL2.1, the text or (at your option) any later version. in your debian/copyright is not correct. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-rails-admin_0.6.3~dfsg-1_amd64.changes
Hi, I marked your package for accept, but app/assets/stylesheets/rails_admin/bootstrap/responsive.scss app/assets/stylesheets/rails_admin/bootstrap/bootstrap.scss should be also added to your Apache license block. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
Re: [DRE-maint] Comments regarding origami_1.2.7-1_amd64.changes
Hi Antonio On Thu, 13 Nov 2014, Antonio Terceiro wrote: Well, I was not super happy with the wordingm, but those _are_ the licensing statements that exist in the upstream sources. Do you have any suggestion on how the text could be improved? I am good at detecting but not at rewording. Maybe the best would be to talk to upstream ... Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-d3-rails_3.4.13+dfsg-1_amd64.changes
Dear Maintainer, this package seems to be rather empty. Would it be possible to add the contents to another package? Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-patron_0.4.18-2_i386.changes REJECTED
as requested by zeha === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-uuid_2.3.7-1_amd64.changes
Hi, all files *.rb say in their header: License:: MIT and/or Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike which looks rather strange. Can you please ask upstream what is meant by this and or or? Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-rails-admin_0.6.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the missing licenses of files in spec/* to your debian/copyright. I found at least SIL OFL 1.1, Apache, Expat or GPL in it. Or maybe you can just remove the directory from the source tarball. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-ftw_0.0.39-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
as requested by sponsor === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-sidekiq_3.2.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package again. The files ./web/assets/javascripts/application.js ./web/assets/javascripts/dashboard.js are still only available in the minified version, which is not the preferred form for modification. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] Comments regarding rhc_1.30.2-1_amd64.changes
Dear Maintainer, I marked your package for accept, but please mention all copyright holders in your debian/coypright, for example James Miller from lib/rhc/vendor/sshkey.rb. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-request-store_1.1.0-1_amd64.changes
Dear Maintainer, this is a rather small package. The size of the Expat license information is greater than the code size. Wouldn't it be possible to group this stuff with something else? Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-sidekiq_3.2.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. There are several minified files without source in directory web (e.g. bootstrap.css). Further the licenses of these minified files are not mentioned in debian/copyright. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-rails-admin_0.6.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Dear Maintainer, please update your debian/copyright. I found files under an Apache license and Dual licensed under the MIT and GPL licenses, which are not mentioned. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
Re: [DRE-maint] ruby-entypo-rails_2.2.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
On Wed, 23 Apr 2014, Pirate Praveen wrote: In debian/copyright you mention CC BY 3.0 and SIL Open Font License but you did not add the license text itself. I have added a link to OFL license, I hope that is enough (source itself doesn't contain the full text). No, I am afraid this is not enough. Please add the complete license text to debian/copyright. Please also tell upstream that he needs to add something (for CC BY 3.0 the link is sufficient, OFL requires to add the complete text). All *.svg files contain a line: Copyright (C) 2012 by original authors @ fontello.com Can you please explain why this line shall result in above mentioned licenses (and add the explanation as comment to debian/copyright)? It is mentioned in README.md and I have added it as a comment. My version of README.md does not contain fontello.com. So why can the copyright move from fontello.com to entypo.com? Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-entypo-rails_2.2.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
explained in other email === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-font-awesome-rails_4.0.3.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Dear Maintainer, please add the complete text of OFL to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-celluloid-io_0.15.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the missing license of lib/celluloid/io/stream.rb to debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-semverse_1.1.0-1_amd64.changes
Dear Maintainer, can you please explain why LICENSE.txt says the license is Expat but metadata.yml and semverse.gemspec tell something about Apache 2. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-kramdown-rfc2629_1.0.13-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please mention the licenses of lib/kramdown-rfc2629.rb in debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-semverse_1.1.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
old version with wrong license information === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-nested-form_0.3.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the missing license of nested-form-0.3.2\spec\dummy\app\assets\javascripts\jquery.js to debian/copyright. Are you sure that you want to distribute nested-form-0.3.2\spec\dummy\tmp\cache\* in the source tarball? Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-client-side-validations_3.2.6+gh-1_amd64.changes
Hi Praveen, I marked your package for accept but please add the dual license of client_side_validations-3.2.6\test\javascript\public\vendor\jquery.metadata.js client_side_validations-3.2.6\test\javascript\public\vendor\qunit.js to debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-source-map_3.0.1+git.20120229.bda06a3f-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the missing BSD license of ruby-source_map-master\lib\source_map\vlq.rb to debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-minitest-stub-const_0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Your debian/copyright needs some rework. In addition can you please tell me why this package is needed in Debian. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-entypo-rails_2.2.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. In debian/copyright you mention CC BY 3.0 and SIL Open Font License but you did not add the license text itself. All *.svg files contain a line: Copyright (C) 2012 by original authors @ fontello.com Can you please explain why this line shall result in above mentioned licenses (and add the explanation as comment to debian/copyright)? Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-sinon-rails_1.4.2.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. The license information of: ruby-sinon-rails-1.4.2.1\vendor\assets\javascripts\sinon.js is missing in debian/coypright. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-em-mongo_0.5.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. According to debian/copyright the license is Expat. According to some file headers is Apache-2.0. Can you please clarify the license status? Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-http_0.5.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the license of ruby-http-0.5.0\lib\http\uri_backport.rb to debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] ruby-re2_0.5.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject you package. The text in LICENSE.TXT does not correspond with the text in debian/copyright. Please adjust debian/copyright accordingly. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
