[DRE-maint] Bug#823397: vagrant-libvirt: backport to jessie
Hi, Antonio Terceiro: > I do not have plans to work on this. > Please go ahead, and feel free to ask on debian-ruby@l.d.o if you have > issues with the backports. Time has passed, we did not act on it, and now Stretch is getting closer, so it's time to clarify that we (Tails) won't be doing this backport. JFTR what we're doing currently is installing vagrant-libvirt and a few dependencies from Stretch (plus a patched ruby-libvirt due to #823395). It's good enough for us until Stretch is released. So, maintainers: feel free to close this bug if you wish :) Cheers, -- intrigeri ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] Bug#823397: vagrant-libvirt: backport to jessie
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 09:43:14AM +, anonym wrote: > Package: vagrant-libvirt > Severity: wishlist > > Dear Maintainer, > > In Tails [0] we are in the process of migrating our Vagrant-based build > system from the VirtualBox provider to the Libvirt one thanks to the > newly uploaded vagrant-livirt package. Since we like Tails to remain > buildable on Jessie, the vagrant-libvirt package would have to be > backported to Jessie. In addition, due to its dependencies, the > following packages would have to be backported to Jessie as well: > > * vagrant > * ruby-excon > * ruby-fog-core > * ruby-fog-libvirt > * ruby-fog-xml > > Luckily I expect all of these backports to be trivial rebuilds -- at the > moment installing these packages from Stretch into Jessie works fine. > > In addition to the above, bug #823395 must also be fixed since > ruby-fog-libvirt requires a ruby-libvirt *with* rubygems integration. An > alternative would be to also backport ruby-libvirt, since Stretch's > version already is fixed (it is not installable in Jessie, though, so > the backporting could be more complicated, YMMV). I do not have plans to work on this. Please go ahead, and feel free to ask on debian-ruby@l.d.o if you have issues with the backports. ruby-libvirt probably just needs to be built on jessie (Depends: libvirt0 (>= 1.2.11~rc1) is not satisfiable in jessie) signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] Bug#823397: vagrant-libvirt: backport to jessie
Package: vagrant-libvirt Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, In Tails [0] we are in the process of migrating our Vagrant-based build system from the VirtualBox provider to the Libvirt one thanks to the newly uploaded vagrant-livirt package. Since we like Tails to remain buildable on Jessie, the vagrant-libvirt package would have to be backported to Jessie. In addition, due to its dependencies, the following packages would have to be backported to Jessie as well: * vagrant * ruby-excon * ruby-fog-core * ruby-fog-libvirt * ruby-fog-xml Luckily I expect all of these backports to be trivial rebuilds -- at the moment installing these packages from Stretch into Jessie works fine. In addition to the above, bug #823395 must also be fixed since ruby-fog-libvirt requires a ruby-libvirt *with* rubygems integration. An alternative would be to also backport ruby-libvirt, since Stretch's version already is fixed (it is not installable in Jessie, though, so the backporting could be more complicated, YMMV). Cheers! [0] https://tails.boum.org/ ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
