[Pkg-utopia-maintainers] flatpak 0.99.2-3 MIGRATED to testing

2018-07-08 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the flatpak source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.99.2-2
  Current version:  0.99.2-3

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

___
Pkg-utopia-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-utopia-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-utopia-maintainers

Re: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#895261: RFS: dbus-broker/13-2 [ITP] -- Linux D-Bus Message Broker

2018-07-08 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi Daniele

Am 09.07.2018 um 01:45 schrieb Daniele Nicolodi:
> my attempt to implement user service management in init-system-helpers
> and debhelper unfortunately stalled by lack of review of the
> init-system-helper patches.  Before I loose all interest, how do prefer
> to solve the issue of user units in the dbus-broker package?

I sincerely apologize for that.
I'm a bit tight on time atm, but it should get better in a few weeks.
My perl is a bit rusty, but I'll try to have a look at it then. I hope
you can bare with us for a little longer.
Felipe, would you be able to review the patches?

Regards,
Michael
-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-utopia-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-utopia-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-utopia-maintainers

[Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#896818: Bug#896818: libnma over GI not working

2018-07-08 Thread Eli Schwartz
On 06/26/2018 10:10 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2018 23:07:25 +0200 Michael Biebl  wrote:
>> Thanks for the bug report.
>> Seems we don't have any package in stretch yet, which uses
>> gir1.2-nma-1.0, which is probably why this issue has went unnoticed.
>>
>> But that also means, it's probably not that important to fix this via a
>> stable upload. Or put this differently: Why do you want to have this
>> fixed in stretch, is there any software you use in stretch that requires
>> gir1.2-nma-1.0?
> One possibly good reason to get this fixed is because, Cinnamon will not
> merge this PR until you do: https://github.com/linuxmint/Cinnamon/pull/7486
> 
> And this PR makes Cinnamon work better and support new features, like
> https://github.com/linuxmint/Cinnamon/pull/7118
> 
> Since the current state of things is that the bindings are badly broken,
> and this does nothing other than to make things work the way they were
> always meant to, I think it is reasonable to backport this pretty minor fix.
> 
> 
> End result: peoples' custom scripts no longer crash and burn.
> 
> Also, downstream developers of software that is in fact in stretch, do
> not need to burden themselves by refusing to improve their software on
> the grounds that it will crash and burn on stretch. This affects both
> people who build their own packages for testing, and people who develop
> a respin of stretch, which is supposed to showcase their software.
> 
> Like Linux Mint Debian Edition, which is based on stretch, but includes
> the latest Cinnamon packages.
> 
> Also, if downstream developers are afraid to use non-deprecated
> libraries like libnma because it will break on Debian, it means other
> distros which use more recent networkmanager versions cannot benefit
> from fixes and improvements, which in its own small way drags down the
> entire Linux ecosystem. As an Arch Linux user (and maintainer of the
> Cinnamon desktop on Arch) I'd like to see Cinnamon be improved...
> 
> It's such a simple fix...
> 
> Please note also that the commit has been backported to
> network-manager-applet's *maintenance* 1.4 branch, and is available in
> 1.4.8 (released 3 weeks ago on 01 Jun 2018).
> 
> Upstream-sanctioned maintenance releases which fix bugs resulting in
> completely broken package components, are good candidates for inclusion. :)

You yourself requested that the cinnamon maintainers apply downstream
patches to cinnamon in order to stop using libnm-glib, cf.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=857231

I'm really trying not to feel like this vindicates my extreme pessimism
about Debian as a distribution, but when you pull stunts like this it's
difficult.

On the one hand you keep filing bugs against any packages which dare to
code against libnm-glib/libnm-gtk.

On the other hand, you refuse to fix the things you want developers to
migrate *to*, on the grounds that they're not yet using it!

If you would just *fix a completely broken component of networkmanager*,
then progress in that upstream PR would move forward, and hopefully be
merged into the next cinnamon release. You could then drop those patches
from the cinnamon package.

This would help move Debian away from being a janky distribution that
obsessively patches everything to death. :(

-- 
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User

___
Pkg-utopia-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-utopia-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-utopia-maintainers

[Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Investment opportunity

2018-07-08 Thread Peter Wong
Greetings,
Please find the content of this mail very confidential. my name is Peter
Wong, I work with a Bank here in Hong Kong. I decided to contact you for
an
opportunity to invest in any lucrative business in your country.
We also offer a quick loan at low interest rate, if you are interested
please reply me for more information on my private e-mail:
hsbcpeterw...@gmail.com
Sincerely: Peter Wong



___
Pkg-utopia-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-utopia-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-utopia-maintainers