Re: Using C++20 in Plasma
Le 6 août 2021 13:06:27 GMT+02:00, Nicolas Fella a écrit : >Hi, > >I would like to explore whether it would be feasible from a distribution >POV to use C++20 in Plasma (and other non-Frameworks projects). > >In practical terms this would mean something like requiring gcc 10 or >clang 10 (the exact version that supports a given standard is hard to >define precisely, but these versions seem to have a reasonable coverage). Hi Nicolas, Debian 11 / bullseye that we're about to release already has gcc 10 as a default so no objection either. Cheers, -- Aurélien
Re: Using C++20 in Plasma
On 06/08/2021 12:06, Nicolas Fella wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to explore whether it would be feasible from a distribution > POV to use C++20 in Plasma (and other non-Frameworks projects). > > In practical terms this would mean something like requiring gcc 10 or > clang 10 (the exact version that supports a given standard is hard to > define precisely, but these versions seem to have a reasonable coverage). > > Is there any distro planning to ship future Plasma releases that does > not have gcc 10 or clang 10? > > Cheers > > Nico > No problem with this from K/Ubuntu
Re: Using C++20 in Plasma
On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 7:06 AM Nicolas Fella wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like to explore whether it would be feasible from a distribution > POV to use C++20 in Plasma (and other non-Frameworks projects). > > In practical terms this would mean something like requiring gcc 10 or > clang 10 (the exact version that supports a given standard is hard to > define precisely, but these versions seem to have a reasonable coverage). > > Is there any distro planning to ship future Plasma releases that does > not have gcc 10 or clang 10? > >From the Red Hat family side, Fedora 34 uses GCC 11, so we're fine there. Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 uses GCC 8 by default, but GCC 10 is available with the gcc-toolset-10 metapackage. >From the SUSE family side, openSUSE Leap 15 uses GCC 7 by default, but offers GCC 10 as an alternative with the gcc10 package. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
Re: Using C++20 in Plasma
On 06/08/2021 13:06, Nicolas Fella wrote: Hi, I would like to explore whether it would be feasible from a distribution POV to use C++20 in Plasma (and other non-Frameworks projects). In practical terms this would mean something like requiring gcc 10 or clang 10 (the exact version that supports a given standard is hard to define precisely, but these versions seem to have a reasonable coverage). I came across this some time ago: https://clang.llvm.org/cxx_status.html (maybe that's what you meant by 'reasonable' coverage? i.e. not all features, but most of the important/useful ones?). Is there any distro planning to ship future Plasma releases that does not have gcc 10 or clang 10? Cheers Nico -- Ahmad Samir
Re: Using C++20 in Plasma
> On Fri, 6 Aug 2021 at 12:06, Nicolas Fella wrote: > > I would like to explore whether it would be feasible from a distribution > > POV to use C++20 in Plasma (and other non-Frameworks projects). >From the FreeBSD side of things, the "oldest" version of the distribution still supported is 11.4 (released June 23, 2020), which says in the release notes: The clang, llvm, lld, lldb, and compiler-rt utilities as well as libc++ have been updated to upstream version 10.0.0. FreeBSD 11 is on its way out, though; 12 has clang 10.0.1, while 13 -- let's call this the most "relevant" release for current use -- has clang 11.0.1. So there's no practical issue for us. [ade] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Using C++20 in Plasma
By default neon (which uses Ubuntu 20.04 as a base) uses gcc 9. But I see gcc 10 is available in the archive so it's probably not hard to switch the packaging to use that. Jonathan On Fri, 6 Aug 2021 at 12:06, Nicolas Fella wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to explore whether it would be feasible from a distribution > POV to use C++20 in Plasma (and other non-Frameworks projects). > > In practical terms this would mean something like requiring gcc 10 or > clang 10 (the exact version that supports a given standard is hard to > define precisely, but these versions seem to have a reasonable coverage). > > Is there any distro planning to ship future Plasma releases that does > not have gcc 10 or clang 10? > > Cheers > > Nico > >
Using C++20 in Plasma
Hi, I would like to explore whether it would be feasible from a distribution POV to use C++20 in Plasma (and other non-Frameworks projects). In practical terms this would mean something like requiring gcc 10 or clang 10 (the exact version that supports a given standard is hard to define precisely, but these versions seem to have a reasonable coverage). Is there any distro planning to ship future Plasma releases that does not have gcc 10 or clang 10? Cheers Nico
