Re: X11 monolitic 6.9.0 for AC
On Friday 23 December 2005 00:21, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 08:03:54PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > On Thursday 22 December 2005 16:04, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > > X11 6.9.0 (monolitic) for AC is arriving to ac-test right now. > > > > > > Please test. > > > > ... and we have a problem. Building fails on ac-alpha with gcc segfault > > (double tested): > > > > alpha-pld-linux-gcc -O2 -mieee > > -I/home/users/builder/rpm/BUILD/X11-6.9.0/xc > > -I/home/users/builder/rpm/BUILD/X11-6.9.0/xc/exports/include -Dlinux > > -D__alpha__ > > -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L -D_POSIX_SOURCE > > -D_XOPEN_SOURCE -D_BSD_SOURCE > > -D_SVID_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE > > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE > > -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO -DHAS_VFORK -DXORG_RELEASE="\"Release > > `echo 6 9 | sed > > 's/ /./g'`\"" -DXVENDORNAME='"The X.Org Foundation"' > > -DXVENDORNAMESHORT='"X.Org"' -c -o util.o util.c > > util.c: In function `GetHeight': > > util.c:365: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault > > Please submit a full bug report, > > with preprocessed source if appropriate. > > See http://bugs.pld-linux.org/> for instructions. > > make[4]: *** [util.o] Error 1 > > make[4]: Leaving directory > > `/home/users/builder/rpm/BUILD/X11-6.9.0/xc/programs/xmh' > > Eh... did both segfaults occur on the same file? Uh, seems not, random. alpha-pld-linux-gcc -c -O2 -mieee -I/home/users/builder/rpm/BUILD/X11-6.9.0/xc -I/home/users/builder/rpm/BUILD/X11-6.9.0/xc/exports/include -Dlinux -D__alpha__ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO -I/home/users/builder/rpm/BUILD/X11-6.9.0/xc/lib/xtrans -DUNIXCONN -DTCPCONN -DHAS_STICKY_DIR_BIT -DHAS_FCHOWN -DIPv6 -DICE_t -DTRANS_CLIENT -DTRANS_SERVER -DFAIL_HARD transport.c -o unshared/transport.o In file included from transport.c:85: /home/users/builder/rpm/BUILD/X11-6.9.0/xc/lib/xtrans/Xtrans.c: In function `_IceTransMakeAllCLTSServerListeners': /home/users/builder/rpm/BUILD/X11-6.9.0/xc/lib/xtrans/Xtrans.c:1257: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See http://bugs.pld-linux.org/> for instructions. make[4]: *** [transport.o] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/users/builder/rpm/BUILD/X11-6.9.0/xc/lib/ICE' -- Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczPLD/Linux Team http://www.t17.ds.pwr.wroc.pl/~misiek/ http://ftp.pld-linux.org/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: X11 monolitic 6.9.0 for AC
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 08:03:54PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > On Thursday 22 December 2005 16:04, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > X11 6.9.0 (monolitic) for AC is arriving to ac-test right now. > > > > Please test. > > ... and we have a problem. Building fails on ac-alpha with gcc segfault > (double tested): > > alpha-pld-linux-gcc -O2 -mieee > -I/home/users/builder/rpm/BUILD/X11-6.9.0/xc > -I/home/users/builder/rpm/BUILD/X11-6.9.0/xc/exports/include -Dlinux > -D__alpha__ > -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L -D_POSIX_SOURCE > -D_XOPEN_SOURCE -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE > > -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 > -D_GNU_SOURCE -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO > -DHAS_VFORK -DXORG_RELEASE="\"Release `echo 6 9 | sed > 's/ /./g'`\"" -DXVENDORNAME='"The X.Org Foundation"' > -DXVENDORNAMESHORT='"X.Org"' -c -o util.o util.c > util.c: In function `GetHeight': > util.c:365: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault > Please submit a full bug report, > with preprocessed source if appropriate. > See http://bugs.pld-linux.org/> for instructions. > make[4]: *** [util.o] Error 1 > make[4]: Leaving directory > `/home/users/builder/rpm/BUILD/X11-6.9.0/xc/programs/xmh' Eh... did both segfaults occur on the same file? I can't see that as buildlogs are not archived on lists.pld-linux.org and buildlogs.pld-linux.org preserves only one FAIL buildlog. I'm currently test-building X11 on ac-alpha and xmh did build successfully this time. The machine has been (physically) cleaned up yesterday. What to test next? Maybe I'll try to disable some RAM chips... -- Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.cs.net.pl/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: X11 monolitic 6.9.0 for AC
Dnia czwartek, 22 grudnia 2005 16:04, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz napisał: > X11 6.9.0 (monolitic) for AC is arriving to ac-test right now. > > Please test. i686, Intel 855GM - works fine here and at last I have the same cursor theme in Firefox (binary, mozilla.org) like in KDE, connecting via XDMCP from a machine with 6.8.2 also works fine here... -- Łukasz [DeeJay1] Jernaś http://www.actus.org.pl/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: X11 monolitic 6.9.0 for AC
On Thursday 22 December 2005 20:43, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > PS. sparc build failed too, but seems easier to fix. It's failing because doesn't know what ,,Bool'' is. Some include with correct typedef is missing or something like that. -- Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczPLD/Linux Team http://www.t17.ds.pwr.wroc.pl/~misiek/ http://ftp.pld-linux.org/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: X11 monolitic 6.9.0 for AC
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 08:03:54PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > On Thursday 22 December 2005 16:04, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > X11 6.9.0 (monolitic) for AC is arriving to ac-test right now. > > > > Please test. > > ... and we have a problem. Building fails on ac-alpha with gcc segfault > (double tested): > > alpha-pld-linux-gcc -O2 -mieee > -I/home/users/builder/rpm/BUILD/X11-6.9.0/xc > -I/home/users/builder/rpm/BUILD/X11-6.9.0/xc/exports/include -Dlinux > -D__alpha__ > -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L -D_POSIX_SOURCE > -D_XOPEN_SOURCE -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE > > -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 > -D_GNU_SOURCE -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO > -DHAS_VFORK -DXORG_RELEASE="\"Release `echo 6 9 | sed > 's/ /./g'`\"" -DXVENDORNAME='"The X.Org Foundation"' > -DXVENDORNAMESHORT='"X.Org"' -c -o util.o util.c > util.c: In function `GetHeight': > util.c:365: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault > Please submit a full bug report, > with preprocessed source if appropriate. > See http://bugs.pld-linux.org/> for instructions. > make[4]: *** [util.o] Error 1 > make[4]: Leaving directory > `/home/users/builder/rpm/BUILD/X11-6.9.0/xc/programs/xmh' > > I love alpha. So who is going to workaround this one? Testing in progress... PS. sparc build failed too, but seems easier to fix. -- Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.cs.net.pl/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ERRORS: pnetlib.spec pnetC.spec ml-pnet.spec OK: pnet.spec]
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 10:02:34PM +0100, Andrzej 'The Undefined' Dopierała wrote: > so - it is for compability with pnet(dotGNU) i think(?). Is it anywhere > used? ./nant.spec:BuildRequires: mono-compat-links >= 1.1.4 ./mono-tools.spec:BuildRequires:mono-compat-links wolf -- Bartek . - Skarbie, kawy ci zrobić? Taudul : .: w o l f @ p l d - l i n u x . o r g.:. http://wolf.valkyrie.one.pl/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: X11 monolitic 6.9.0 for AC
On Thursday 22 December 2005 16:04, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > X11 6.9.0 (monolitic) for AC is arriving to ac-test right now. > > Please test. ... and we have a problem. Building fails on ac-alpha with gcc segfault (double tested): alpha-pld-linux-gcc -O2 -mieee -I/home/users/builder/rpm/BUILD/X11-6.9.0/xc -I/home/users/builder/rpm/BUILD/X11-6.9.0/xc/exports/include -Dlinux -D__alpha__ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO -DHAS_VFORK -DXORG_RELEASE="\"Release `echo 6 9 | sed 's/ /./g'`\"" -DXVENDORNAME='"The X.Org Foundation"' -DXVENDORNAMESHORT='"X.Org"' -c -o util.o util.c util.c: In function `GetHeight': util.c:365: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See http://bugs.pld-linux.org/> for instructions. make[4]: *** [util.o] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/users/builder/rpm/BUILD/X11-6.9.0/xc/programs/xmh' I love alpha. So who is going to workaround this one? -- Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczPLD/Linux Team http://www.t17.ds.pwr.wroc.pl/~misiek/ http://ftp.pld-linux.org/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
X11 monolitic 6.9.0 for AC
X11 6.9.0 (monolitic) for AC is arriving to ac-test right now. Please test. There was one bug in X11 which affects building X11-fonts.spec but it's already fixed in cvs and you don't need new X11-fonts to test X11 :) -- Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczPLD/Linux Team http://www.t17.ds.pwr.wroc.pl/~misiek/ http://ftp.pld-linux.org/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ERRORS: pnetlib.spec pnetC.spec ml-pnet.spec OK: pnet.spec]
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 06:18:24PM +0100, Bartosz Taudul wrote: > > why not use resgen from pnet, which is available on all platforms? > It's only asking for trouble IMHO. I don't want to debug some weird > errors introduced by using not-from-mono-unlike-rest-of-toolchain > utility. so.. how resolve this conflict? mono doesn't exist on architecture, so we can't remove reskit from pnet-compiler-common... other way: poldek:/all-avail> desc mono-compat-links-1.1.9.2-1 Package:mono-compat-links-1.1.9.2-1 Summary:Dowiązania dla kompatybilności Group: Development/Languages License:GPL/LGPL/MIT Arch/OS:amd64/linux URL:http://www.mono-project.com/ Built: 2005/10/11 12:48 at localhost Size: 0.0 KB (63 B) Package size: 5.0 KB (5597 B) Path: ftp://ftp.ac.pld-linux.org/dists/ac/PLD/amd64/PLD/RPMS File: mono-compat-links-1.1.9.2-1.amd64.rpm Description: Pakiet ten zawiera dowiązania do programów o nazwach używanych w .NET oraz dotGNU. so - it is for compability with pnet(dotGNU) i think(?). Is it anywhere used? -- Andrzej 'The Undefined' Dopierała UNIX && Linux administrator, Adam Mickiewicz University WMiI PLD Linux Developer HomePage: http://andrzej.dopierala.name/ JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
