Re: AC-branch usage suggestion

2006-04-13 Thread wrobell
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 00:13 +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
 On Wednesday 12 April 2006 21:07, Michal Kochanowicz wrote:
  Because it against natural reading order.
  Why?
  Topposting.
  What is most annoying in the Internet?
 i post to top when i don't have anything to quote, but reply to whole message.

and you are so brave to claim that no other person
will answer to yours? :)

cheers,

  wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en


sending build requests for th, a proposal of rules

2006-04-13 Thread wrobell
hello,

th is quite usable for some of us now, so what about
such two rules?

1. if you send something to th builders, then it should
   build on all archs. this means that if package building
   fails on one of the builders, then it is sender responsibility
   to fix this before sending another request. 

   if you are not able to fix something, then tell about it on the list,
   so we can work together to fix the problem.
   
2. if you want to send a package to builders, then _build_ and _run_ it
   on your machine first. this means, that if soname changes then
   it is sender responsibility to rebuild or other dependant packages.

   if you have no time for soname play, then don't send a request to
   builders. if you are in middle of the process and your cat needs
   you, then ask other developer to finish the job.

   if it involves a lot of time (i.e. openssl), then tell people on
   the list about it.


of course, this is only a proposal. i think that such rules could
improve stability of system for testers. then, maybe we could
gain more people to test pld th.

regards,

  wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en


Re: pld-builder.new (WORKING): client/make-request.sh - add $default_b...

2006-04-13 Thread Mariusz Mazur
On Wednesday 12 April 2006 16:07, glen wrote:
 Author: glen Date: Wed Apr 12 14:07:29 2006 GMT
 Module: pld-builder.new   Tag: WORKING
  Log message:
 - add $default_branch support

Ac isn't using the WORKING branch version of pld-builder afaik.


-- 
Judge others by their intentions and yourself by your results.
 Guy Kawasaki
Education is an admirable thing, but it is well to remember from
time to time that nothing that is worth knowing can be taught.
  Oscar Wilde
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en


Re: AC-branch usage suggestion

2006-04-13 Thread Michal Kochanowicz
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 12:13:07AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
 i post to top when i don't have anything to quote, but reply to whole
 ^^

If you don't have anything to quote why quote EVERYTHING?? If you
don't have anything to quote - don't quote anything. And everybody can
go to message you are replayng to, if he/she want's to read it.

-- 
--= Michal Kochanowicz =--==--==BOFH==--==--= [EMAIL PROTECTED] =--
--= finger me for PGP public key or visit http://michal.waw.pl/PGP =--
--==--==--==--==--==-- Vodka. Connecting people.--==--==--==--==--==--
A chodzenie po górach SSIE!!!
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en


Re: pld-builder.new (WORKING): client/make-request.sh - add $default_b...

2006-04-13 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Thursday 13 April 2006 14:54, Mariusz Mazur wrote:
 On Wednesday 12 April 2006 16:07, glen wrote:
  Author: glen Date: Wed Apr 12 14:07:29 2006 GMT
  Module: pld-builder.new   Tag: WORKING
   Log message:
  - add $default_branch support

 Ac isn't using the WORKING branch version of pld-builder afaik.
dunno. i use it. works ok.
feel free to propagate the change to all neccessary branches ;)

-- 
glen
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en


Re: sending build requests for th, a proposal of rules

2006-04-13 Thread Fryderyk Dziarmagowski
--- wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 hello,

hi,

 th is quite usable for some of us now, so what about
 such two rules?
 
 1. if you send something to th builders, then it should
build on all archs. this means that if package building
fails on one of the builders, then it is sender responsibility
to fix this before sending another request. 
 
if you are not able to fix something, then tell about it on the list,
so we can work together to fix the problem.

 2. if you want to send a package to builders, then _build_ and _run_ it
on your machine first. this means, that if soname changes then
it is sender responsibility to rebuild or other dependant packages.
 
if you have no time for soname play, then don't send a request to
builders. if you are in middle of the process and your cat needs
you, then ask other developer to finish the job.
 
if it involves a lot of time (i.e. openssl), then tell people on
the list about it.
 
 
 of course, this is only a proposal. i think that such rules could
 improve stability of system for testers. then, maybe we could
 gain more people to test pld th.

simple and clear rules. Th is not a trash, it's very usable (thx to
pluto's work) and should stay so. So, dear developer, don't forget to
check wrobell's words before sending a builder request.

-- 
Fryderyk Dziarmagowski
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en


qt 3.3.6 [was Re: th and macromedia flash under any browser]

2006-04-13 Thread Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
On Sunday 09 April 2006 23:01, Aredridel wrote:
 On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 22:58 +0200, Adam Gorzkiewicz wrote:
  Dnia sobota 08 kwietnia 2006 12:01, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz napisał:
   Hi,
  
   Is macromedia flash working for you under Th (i686 here)?
  
   What I'm getting is white boxes identified as flash but nothing is
   displayed on these (no text, no graphics).
  
   Example url: http://www.miniclip.com/motherload/index.htm
 
  SOA
 
  Anyway - i have no contents in flash contdekst menu, under the right
  mouse click.

 Works for me -- flash 7.0.61, with composite extension enabled and
 render, with and without xcompmgr.

Composite - that was it. After disabling composite I'm seeing flash animations 
properly!

Now new problem appeared. qt 3.3.6-1 from Th. When upgrading to it my fonts 
became very, very small. Downgrading qt back to 3.3.5 snapshot fixed font 
problem.

Anyone?

 Aria

-- 
Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczPLD/Linux Team
arekm / maven.plhttp://ftp.pld-linux.org/
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en