SoC 2006
Djurban said it has been different last year but it seems (according to the FAQ) that the mentor of a SoC 2006 project can be a company or even private person. Maybe we should consider applying? Long story short: $4500 for the participating student + $500 for the mentor organization (or for the mentor himself) for a OpenSource project finished by 1st September 2006. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
th, ruby blocks koffice
Hi, New ruby contains fix for eaccess() duplication which is needed to build new koffice. Unfortunately ruby build fails on th-ppc: ppc-pld-linux-gcc -O2 -fsigned-char -ggdb -fPIC -DRUBY_EXPORT -I. -I. -c version.c ppc-pld-linux-gcc -O2 -fsigned-char -ggdb -fPIC -DRUBY_EXPORT -I. -I. -c dmyext.c ar rcu libruby-static.a array.o bignum.o class.o compar.o dir.o dln.o enum.o error.o eval.o file.o gc.o hash.o inits.o io.o marshal.o math.o numeric.o object.o pack.o parse.o process.o prec.o random.o range.o re.o regex.o ruby.o signal.o sprintf.o st.o string.o struct.o time.o util.o variable.o version.o dmyext.o ppc-pld-linux-gcc -O2 -fsigned-char -ggdb -fPIC -DRUBY_EXPORT -I. -I. -c main.c ppc-pld-linux-gcc main.o libruby-static.a -lpthread -ldl -lcrypt -lm -o miniruby -O2 -fsigned-char -ggdb -fPIC -DRUBY_EXPORT -rdynamic -Wl,-export-dynamic rbconfig.rb updated ppc-pld-linux-gcc -shared -Wl,-soname,libruby.so.1.8 array.o bignum.o class.o compar.o dir.o dln.o enum.o error.o eval.o file.o gc.o hash.o inits.o io.o marshal.o math.o numeric.o object.o pack.o parse.o process.o prec.o random.o range.o re.o regex.o ruby.o signal.o sprintf.o st.o string.o struct.o time.o util.o variable.o version.o dmyext.o -lpthread -ldl -lcrypt -lm -o libruby.so.1.8.4 compiling Win32API /home/users/builder/rpm/BUILD/ruby-1.8.4/lib/mkmf.rb:804: [BUG] Segmentation fault ruby 1.8.4 (2005-12-24) [powerpc-linux] Unfortunately I no longer have linux-ppc machine and I have no access to th ppc builder. wrobell? -- Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczPLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.plhttp://ftp.pld-linux.org/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: sending build requests for th, a proposal of rules
On Thursday 13 April 2006 10:02, wrobell wrote: > hello, > > th is quite usable for some of us now, so what about > such two rules? > > 1. if you send something to th builders, then it should >build on all archs. this means that if package building >fails on one of the builders, then it is sender responsibility >to fix this before sending another request. > >if you are not able to fix something, then tell about it on the list, >so we can work together to fix the problem. But we do not have something like ac-test in Th :( There is some hidden test without poldek indexes (which makes the think much less useable). > > 2. if you want to send a package to builders, then _build_ and _run_ it >on your machine first. this means, that if soname changes then >it is sender responsibility to rebuild or other dependant packages. > >if you have no time for soname play, then don't send a request to >builders. if you are in middle of the process and your cat needs >you, then ask other developer to finish the job. > >if it involves a lot of time (i.e. openssl), then tell people on >the list about it. There are two packages currently with soname changes. expat and openssl. expat case isn't yet clear and rebuilding stuff for openssl and then again for expat would be stupid. So openssl has to wait. It didn't upgrade on builders so what the problem? > of course, this is only a proposal. i think that such rules could > improve stability of system for testers. then, maybe we could > gain more people to test pld th. Proposal is fine for th-main and th-ready and would be fine for all th* if we had ac-test like thing. Current th-test is afaik something different. I don't know how packages flow is done in th right now. > regards, > > wrobell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczPLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.plhttp://ftp.pld-linux.org/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: qt 3.3.6 [was Re: th and macromedia flash under any browser]
On Friday 14 April 2006 10:12, Paweł Sikora wrote: > Dnia piątek, 14 kwietnia 2006 09:36, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz napisał: > > On Thursday 13 April 2006 23:38, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > > Now new problem appeared. qt 3.3.6-1 from Th. When upgrading to it my > > > fonts became very, very small. Downgrading qt back to 3.3.5 snapshot > > > fixed font problem. > > > > > > Anyone? > > > > 3.3.6-1.1 from Th doesn't have that problem (in it two font related > > patches were commented out). > > qt-3.3.6-1 from th works for me, And do you have wsxga? I think that's the problem with bigger resolutions on DisplaySize much lower than default in X. > so $(cvs diff -u -r1.355 -r1.356 qt.spec) is not quite correct. It was also dropped on qt-copy branch for some reason (not mentioned in changelog unfortunately). Do we really know what these patches are for? -- Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczPLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.plhttp://ftp.pld-linux.org/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: qt 3.3.6 [was Re: th and macromedia flash under any browser]
Dnia piątek, 14 kwietnia 2006 09:36, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz napisał: > On Thursday 13 April 2006 23:38, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > Now new problem appeared. qt 3.3.6-1 from Th. When upgrading to it my > > fonts became very, very small. Downgrading qt back to 3.3.5 snapshot > > fixed font problem. > > > > Anyone? > > 3.3.6-1.1 from Th doesn't have that problem (in it two font related patches > were commented out). qt-3.3.6-1 from th works for me, so $(cvs diff -u -r1.355 -r1.356 qt.spec) is not quite correct. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: qt 3.3.6 [was Re: th and macromedia flash under any browser]
On Thursday 13 April 2006 23:38, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > Now new problem appeared. qt 3.3.6-1 from Th. When upgrading to it my fonts > became very, very small. Downgrading qt back to 3.3.5 snapshot fixed font > problem. > > Anyone? 3.3.6-1.1 from Th doesn't have that problem (in it two font related patches were commented out). > > > Aria -- Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczPLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.plhttp://ftp.pld-linux.org/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
