[th] apache-base requires /etc/monit
apache-base requires the /etc/monit directory thanks to our new favorite rpm feature. What's the correct way to fix this? R: monit is a no-no, of course. -- Radosław Zieliński [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpdeldtRyX3W.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [th] apache-base requires /etc/monit
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 20:51, havner wrote: On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 07:15:22PM +0100, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote: apache-base requires the /etc/monit directory thanks to our new favorite rpm feature. What's the correct way to fix this? R: monit is a no-no, of course. Move it to filesystem.spec imo, the same with /etc/logrotate.d (not everyone might want to have it and some core applications provide configs for it) Wouldn't monit-apache subpackage be better? We don't end up with tons of application specific directories in filesystem.spec. -- Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczPLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.plhttp://ftp.pld-linux.org/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [th] apache-base requires /etc/monit
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:00:51PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
Move it to filesystem.spec imo, the same with /etc/logrotate.d (not
everyone might want to have it and some core applications provide
configs for it)
Wouldn't monit-apache subpackage be better? We don't end up with tons of
application specific directories in filesystem.spec.
I'd prefer more or less generic dirs in one package then _tons_ of
single one dir packages.
--
RegardsHavner {jid,mail}:havner(at)pld-linux.org
PLD developerhttp://www.pld-linux.org
PLD LiveCD author http://livecd.pld-linux.org
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [th] apache-base requires /etc/monit
havner wrote: On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:00:51PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: Move it to filesystem.spec imo, the same with /etc/logrotate.d (not everyone might want to have it and some core applications provide configs for it) Wouldn't monit-apache subpackage be better? We don't end up with tons of application specific directories in filesystem.spec. I'd prefer more or less generic dirs in one package then _tons_ of single one dir packages. The dir should still belong to monit. The apache files that are located in this dir should go to a subpackage. -- === Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone (48)(58) 347 14 61 Faculty of Applied Phys. Math., Gdansk University of Technology ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [th] apache-base requires /etc/monit
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 21:24, havner wrote: On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:00:51PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: Move it to filesystem.spec imo, the same with /etc/logrotate.d (not everyone might want to have it and some core applications provide configs for it) Wouldn't monit-apache subpackage be better? We don't end up with tons of application specific directories in filesystem.spec. I'd prefer more or less generic dirs in one package then _tons_ of single one dir packages. ? The *dir* should be only in monit.spec package while apache config file for monit in monit-apache subpackage. -- Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczPLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.plhttp://ftp.pld-linux.org/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [th] apache-base requires /etc/monit
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 21:51, havner wrote: On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 07:15:22PM +0100, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote: apache-base requires the /etc/monit directory thanks to our new favorite rpm feature. What's the correct way to fix this? R: monit is a no-no, of course. Move it to filesystem.spec imo, the same with /etc/logrotate.d (not everyone might want to have it and some core applications provide configs for it) but mostly they already require logrotate (i'm speaking of packages providing logrotate config). not that i always want logrotate (f.e inside vserver). otherwise on my average system i have installed: # rpm -qf /etc/monit/* apache1-1.3.37-1 apache-base-2.2.3-1 mysql-5.0.24-2 -- glen ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [th] apache-base requires /etc/monit
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:31:57PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
The *dir* should be only in monit.spec package while apache config file for
monit in monit-apache subpackage.
True, sorry for misunderstanding.
--
RegardsHavner {jid,mail}:havner(at)pld-linux.org
PLD developerhttp://www.pld-linux.org
PLD LiveCD author http://livecd.pld-linux.org
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [th] apache-base requires /etc/monit
Andrzej Krzysztofowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [23-08-2006 20:28]: havner wrote: On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:00:51PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: Wouldn't monit-apache subpackage be better? We don't end up with tons of application specific directories in filesystem.spec. I'd prefer more or less generic dirs in one package then _tons_ of single one dir packages. The dir should still belong to monit. The apache files that are located in this dir should go to a subpackage. Or maybe put the file in monit as well? It's monit configuration after all. -- Radosław Zieliński [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpyoBJL4pS3C.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
