Re: broken pl LC_TIME

2007-10-02 Thread Tomasz Pala
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 10:16:56 +0200, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:

 Intention is clearly explained in bugzilla references.
 IMO I/II/III is better than sty/lut/mar.

For anyone interested:
http://karlik.nonlogic.org/blog/wpisy/ogolne/daty-w-glibc-sonda

this blog entry refers to two more bug references with discussion.
It seems that one of:

[DOW], 16 lip 2007 17:00:10 CEST
[DOW], 16.07.2007 17:00:10 CEST

is going to be used (again). I'd preferred '16.07.2007', as it's
contemporary polish notation, however some broken programs report
'07.16' and so IMO '16 lip 2007' is the best non-confusing compromise.
Fixed-width [DOW] without leading dot is fine either.

So if anyone here is interested, please comment in
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4789
or vote.

-- 
Tomasz Pala [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en


Re: broken pl LC_TIME

2007-10-02 Thread Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
On Tuesday 02 of October 2007, Tomasz Pala wrote:

 So if anyone here is interested, please comment in
 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4789
 or vote.

Voting? Crazy bastards.

-- 
Arkadiusz MiƛkiewiczPLD/Linux Team
arekm / maven.plhttp://ftp.pld-linux.org/
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en