Re: packages (rpm-4_5): rpm/rpm.spec - added arm support - TODO added
On 06/10/2010 03:11 PM, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: On Thursday 10 June 2010 13:46:57 tommat wrote: %ifarch sparc64 sparc64-[^-]*-[Ll]inux(-gnu)? -sparcv8-[^-]*-[Ll]inux(-gnu)? -sparcv9-[^-]*-[Ll]inux(-gnu)? %endif -%ifarch sparcv9 -sparcv8-[^-]*-[Ll]inux(-gnu)? +%ifarch sparcv9 sparc64 sparcv9-[^-]*-[Ll]inux(-gnu)? %endif %ifarch sparc sparcv9 sparc64 sparc-[^-]*-[Ll]inux(-gnu)? %endif why did you remove those sparc entries? at least if you intended to remove them, you should say so in commit message too Yes, forgot mentioned about removing sparcv8 which is even nowhere supported as an arch, sorry. BTW. I'm tired trying to do something on sparcs so I have Ultra60 2x450MHz 1,7G RAM, 2x36G plus some spare parts to put in good hands. (I can consider keyboard+mouse+21CRT monitor also :-) ) Best Regards -- T. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: CVSROOT: users - make AIDA Th aliases - sorted
Elan Ruusamäe pisze: On Monday 10 November 2008 23:39, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: Please fix sorting, you broke it. and which collation should be used for sorting? (to tommat) and when sorting leave vim line somewhere as first or as last: vim:encoding=utf-8 Moved manually README and vim :-) but now sorting is reverted, sorry. -- T. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: antargis.spec, archivemail.spec, builder, ekg.spec, gpm.spec, kpogre...
adamg pisze: Author: adamgDate: Sun May 18 16:12:29 2008 GMT Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD Log message: - new Files affected: SPECS: antargis.spec (1.4 - 1.5) , archivemail.spec (1.19 - 1.20) , builder (1.557 - 1.558) , ekg.spec (1.217 - 1.218) , gpm.spec (1.145 - 1.146) , kpogre.spec (1.10 - 1.11) , lyx.spec (1.123 - 1.124) , openttd.spec (1.47 - 1.48) , php-pear-Date_Holidays.spec (1.30 - 1.31) , php-pear-PhpDocumentor.spec (1.33 - 1.34) , php-pear-URI_Template.spec (NONE - 1.1) (NEW), pida.spec (1.18 - 1.19) , python-kiwi.spec (1.6 - 1.7) Oj sie chyba komitło za duzo :-) czy nie? -- T. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
xalan-c @ sparc
wywala sie na: rm -f ../../lib/libxalan-c.so \ ln -fs libxalan-c.so.110.0 ../../lib/libxalan-c.so rm -f ../../lib/libxalan-c.so.110 \ ln -fs libxalan-c.so.110.0 ../../lib/libxalan-c.so.110 sparc-pld-linux-g++ -O2 -DNDEBUG -I/usr/include-Wall -fPIC -DLINUX -D_REENTRANT -DXALAN_ICU_MSG_LOADER -DXALAN_USE_ICU -c -I/home/users/builder/rpm/BUILD/xml-xalan/c/src -I/home/users/builder/rpm/BUILD/xml-xalan/c/include -I../../nls/include -I/src/ -I/include/xercesc -I/include/ -I/usr/include -o ../../obj/process.o /home/users/builder/rpm/BUILD/xml-xalan/c/src/xalanc/TestXSLT/process.cpp sparc-pld-linux-g++ -DLINUX -fPIC -DXALAN_ICU_MSG_LOADER -DXALAN_USE_ICU -Wl,-rpath,/usr/lib \ -L../../lib -L/home/users/builder/rpm/BUILD/xml-xalan/c/lib -lxalan-c -lm -L/usr -L/usr/lib -L/usr/data -lpthread -L/lib -lxerces-c -L../../lib -lxalanMsg -L/usr/lib -licuuc -L/usr/lib -licui18n ../../obj/process.o -o ../../bin/testXSLT ../../lib/libxalanMsg.so: undefined reference to `xalanMsg__nls_icu_xalanMsg_en_US_res' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [../../bin/testXSLT] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/users/builder/rpm/BUILD/xml-xalan/c/src/xalanc' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /home/users/builder/tmp/rpm-tmp.5928 (%build) Tylko zastanawiam sie czy to wina icu czy xalan-a. Sparc64 to samo. Any advises?? -- T. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
[Fwd: Re: [Th] Upgrade apport - jak rozumieć ten błąd?]
Translated: I've tried to check what hurts AC: 1. During the instalation from bootdisk-net, basic instalation, the SysVinit package wasn't installed - result nonbooting system, when manually installed - it works 2. Upgrade AC, it fails when upgrading rpm with the message of missing lzma, when manully install the lzma package it installs but fails on rebuilding rpm database. 3. after reboot: locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory stty: invalid argument `-utf8' Try `stty --help' for more information. 4. By the way who [EMAIL PROTECTED]@^%*(^%$% put kernel-2.6.22 to AC? 5. Not mentioning the fact that not everything in AC is signed and default config demands signed packages AC was intended as STABLE!!! To AC RM (whoever it is) if you wanna sandbox play with HEAD or make another fork like Ti but please leave STABLE pld as stable. This changes are making users which are for years with pld leaving us. Best Regards -- T. ---BeginMessage--- Marcin Krol pisze: Jezeli chodzi o Ac, przykro mi ze wyglada to jak wyglada i ze sie na ta linie oglednie mowiac wypialem. Niektore ze zmian, ktore wprowadzil glen nigdy IMO nie powinny miec miejsca w stabilnej linii, np rpm 4.4.9 ktory dosc skutecznie rozwalil mi jakis czas temu system. Nosz przecież ka mać. Wczoraj z używania PLD zrezygnował kojejny użytkownik ;P Spróbowalem zbadać co boli AC. 1. Przy instalacji z bootdisk-net, instalacja basic, nie zainstalowal sie SysVinit co spowodowalo niezbootowanie sie systemu - reczne doinstalowanie no i dziala. 2. Upgrade AC, wywala sie upgrade rpm-a ze nie ma lzma, po zainstalowaniu lzma, rpm sie instaluje ale wywala na probie przebudowania bazy. 3. po restarcie dostaje: locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory stty: invalid argument `-utf8' Try `stty --help' for more information. 4. Pozatym co za [EMAIL PROTECTED]@^%*(^%$% wrzucil kernel-2.6.22 do AC? 5. Pomijam fakt że nie wszystko w AC jest podpisane a defaultowy konfig wymaga podpisanych pakietów Przecież to miała być STABILNA gałąź dystrybucji. Kto teraz jes RM AC ?? Pozdrawiam. -- T. ___ pld-devel-pl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-pl ---End Message--- ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [Fwd: Re: [Th] Upgrade apport - jak rozumieć t en błąd?]
Elan Ruusamäe pisze: On Wednesday 09 April 2008 20:33, Tomasz Mateja wrote: Translated: I've tried to check what hurts AC: 1. During the instalation from bootdisk-net, basic instalation, the SysVinit package wasn't installed - result nonbooting system, when manually installed - it works recommended way of installing is chroot install, and there it is you who says what to install. the installer might had worked for Ra, it was put to Ac only because there doesn't exist anything else. And that was one of WORKING methods while freezing AC - so while it is stable it should work. and what did it install afterall? as rc-scripts which is needed for quite everything is dependencies: $ ac-requires SysVinit rc-scripts-0.4.1.18-1.i686 Try yourself in vmware or virtualbox 2. Upgrade AC, it fails when upgrading rpm with the message of missing lzma, when manully install the lzma package it installs but fails on rebuilding rpm database. upgrade to ac from what? Upgrade AC to AC+updates with poldek upgrade * (most users do that) 'poldek --upgrade-dist' works fine here (having only ac,ac-updates trees enabled) 3. after reboot: locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory stty: invalid argument `-utf8' Try `stty --help' for more information. missing context. what did issue this message? Dunno, what context do you want?, simply try basic installation from bootdisk-net and upgrade after that (not editing nor configuring anything) 4. By the way who [EMAIL PROTECTED]@^%*(^%$% put kernel-2.6.22 to AC? it is in ac-ready, using ac-test or ac-ready is your own risk, as quite some developers can send pkgs there, so it's contents are not ftp admin decision/control. and instead of living out your feelings, report bugs what is wrong with 2.6.22 kernel (in lists or http://bugs.pld-linux.org/). 2.6.16 is at least three years old kernel. upstream is near 2.6.25 already. and th/ti do have 2.6.22 kernel, do you shout there too? So what? Why not upgrade glibc in ac to 2.7? and XFree to xorg - they are also very old. This is STABLE so minor updates or security updates are welcome. bugs.pld-... is not the place for this request. 5. Not mentioning the fact that not everything in AC is signed and default config demands signed packages don't enable such trees then. signed in ac are 'ac' and 'ac-updates' and 'ac-supported' trees only. Yes I mean only ac and ac-updates AC was intended as STABLE!!! definition of stable can vary. To AC RM (whoever it is) if you wanna sandbox play with HEAD or make another fork like Ti but please leave STABLE pld as stable. This changes are making users which are for years with pld leaving us. reporting bugs early might get them resolved. just whining won't lead you anywhere. and if you definition of stable is old packages, why bother upgrading packages from ac-updates afterall? updates was intended to security, bugfix updates. whats the difference between ac/ti/th when you can update everything?? Maybe let's update RA to kernel 2.6.25 Best regards. -- T. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [Fwd: Re: [Th] Upgrade apport - jak rozumieć t en błąd?]
Elan Ruusamäe pisze: Try yourself in vmware or virtualbox no i won't. if you want something fixed, share 'rpm -qa' (answer to question what was installed afterall) Ok I'll prepare detailed report but I don't like your attitude as a RM. Whats the difference between grey developer and RM?? RM can send build requests? move rpm's in ftp? true. But RM is required to use brain in every move he makes. He is the last QA for everything in distro. Best regards. -- T. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [Fwd: Re: [Th] Upgrade apport - jak rozumieć t en błąd?]
Elan Ruusamäe pisze: On Wednesday 09 April 2008 21:25, Tomasz Mateja wrote: and instead of living out your feelings, report bugs what is wrong with 2.6.22 kernel (in lists or http://bugs.pld-linux.org/). 2.6.16 is at least three years old kernel. upstream is near 2.6.25 already. and th/ti do have 2.6.22 kernel, do you shout there too? So what? Why not upgrade glibc in ac to 2.7? and XFree to xorg - they are also very old. This is STABLE so minor updates or security updates are welcome. bugs.pld-... is not the place for this request. glibc = would break 2.4 kernel compatability (afaik already glibc 2.4 required 2.6.0 kernel), that has been accidentally already broken several times. intentionally broking it would be evil. xorg 7.0 = too much to rebuild with so less gain, and so far there's no binary incompatibility that i've encountered using X11 (aka xorg 6.9). and kernel update is needed to let ac live a little longer. as there's need to support newer hardware. it was considered dead already time it was released. and some major changes like updating glibc or gcc would mean changing the distro, i.e dropping some architectures and 2.4 kernel compatability. What are the super-hiper features with new release of kernel?? Remeber - no xorg - no compiz - no fun - kernel upgrade wont help Old glibc - new kernel - compatibility emulated - what new features? upgrade kernel for desktops in AC - useless upgrade kernel for servers - more useless -- T. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [Fwd: Re: [Th] Upgrade apport - jak rozumieć t en błąd?]
Elan Ruusamäe pisze: On Wednesday 09 April 2008 21:25, Tomasz Mateja wrote: and if you definition of stable is old packages, why bother upgrading packages from ac-updates afterall? updates was intended to security, bugfix updates. whats the difference between ac/ti/th when you can update everything?? Maybe let's update RA to kernel 2.6.25 point me to the document where's written what for was intended purpose of ac-updates. however having just updates or just security won't work as updated packages depend on each other, so you end up needing for package in general a package security tree or vice versa. and easiest way to fix security issues is upgrade software, to catch up the patch from upstream. i haven't noticed active security team to patch and backport changes to old versions in pld. we don't have such developer power (and apparently no interest either) like debian does. I don't think there is such document but in lists I can try to find and translate - for sure it was on polish list. I know we all are doing PLD in our spare time. So maybe do not disperse time and forces to update AC leave this working, maybe old but working. Prepare way to upgrade AC to TH/TI and use force in mainstream. -- T. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [Fwd: Re: [Th] Upgrade apport - jak rozumieć t en błąd?]
Patryk Zawadzki pisze: On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Tomasz Mateja [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Elan Ruusamäe pisze: Try yourself in vmware or virtualbox no i won't. if you want something fixed, share 'rpm -qa' (answer to question what was installed afterall) Ok I'll prepare detailed report but I don't like your attitude as a RM. Whats the difference between grey developer and RM?? RM can send build requests? move rpm's in ftp? true. But RM is required to use brain in every move he makes. He is the last QA for everything in distro. Not everything and especially not some old floppy installation method :) Why not? Is it part of AC or not? If not - please remove this from ftp. -- T. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [Fwd: Re: [Th] Upgrade apport - jak rozumieć t en błąd?]
Jakub Bogusz pisze: What are the super-hiper features with new release of kernel?? Remeber - no xorg - no compiz - no fun - kernel upgrade wont help Old glibc - new kernel - compatibility emulated - what new features? Usability with current hardware. Disk controllers, Ethernet adapters etc. Any volunteers to backport those new drivers/driver updates to 2.6.16? Use Ti?? Or Th if you're brave?? I dont understand why making 3 lines of distro (with all the time and work effort) which almost are identical (or becomes to be) -- T. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [Fwd: Re: [Th] Upgrade apport - jak rozumieć t en błąd?]
Patryk Zawadzki pisze: On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Tomasz Mateja [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Patryk Zawadzki pisze: Not everything and especially not some old floppy installation method :) Why not? Is it part of AC or not? If not - please remove this from ftp. Because debugging it is beyond interest of most developers. I simply see BluRay discs more often than working floppy drives. Current RescueCD is a great way to install the distro. There are also instructions for building a custom live CD and anaconda in our wiki. Not true - all AC's (more than 100) I've installed were installed from network floppy. But the question remains - are the images part of AC or not? While booted they says PLD Linux 2.0 and they are in AC tree in ftp. Another - quite old question is - Is PLD distribution for people or for it's developers - if second is true please move all resources from www/wiki to cvs/svn ;-P Best regards. -- T. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [Fwd: Re: [Th] Upgrade apport - jak rozumieć t en błąd?]
Adam Golebiowski pisze: As above - it's all about new features, like new hardware, powertop, vmsplice exploit support... I do not need powertop on my server, but would like to play a bit with it on my laptop. And no, I do not want (-ENOTIME) to migrate to Ti or Th. I Still dont understand. All of you have ENOTIME for migration but who counted time for developing 3 lines of distro?? I assure you if there was one (or two - stable with sec,bugfixex and devel) you would have a time for migration. -- T. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC installation was (Re: [F wd: Re: [Th] Upgrade apport - jak r ozumieć ten błąd?])
Tomasz Pala pisze: On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 01:01:16 +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: stty: invalid argument `-utf8' Try `stty --help' for more information. [ DONE ] there's no 'locale' command invocation i can find from kbd package. not even matces for 'stty' invocation. This was already reported on -pl. Subject: [Th+Ac] unicode_stop nie współgra z stty - błędy w skryptach startowych From: Łukasz Maśko [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Moved AC-branch tag on stty patch, glen please send kbd to AC (I think there will be need to move AC-branch tag on spec also) Regards -- T. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC installation was (Re: [Fwd: Re: [Th] Upgrade apport - jak rozumiec' ten b?a;d?])
Marcin Krol pisze: hawk did. and the biggest problem was that the data does not fit to disk. AFAIR there was just few KB left on some disk. Also I don't have installer build environment anymore. Pity, but I'll try to make some. upgrading disks, would mean that disks should use also packages from ac-updates, which in turn means the poldek/rpm should be upgraded on disk to ac-updates versions or db issues will arise. No way to do that, poldek 0.2x fails to compile when trying static build. Nobody cared to fix it. Haven't tried to build 0.3x statically. Already on my todo list :) -- T. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
[Th] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I still cannot manage to get rpm at sparc64 working with rpms compressed with lzma (f.ex. noarch from our ftp) those compressed with bzip working without any problems, rpmbuild produces good lzma compressed rpms. So problem is only with extracting. simple gdb log: http://rg4.polsl.pl/pldsparc/rpm.gdb [EMAIL PROTECTED] RPMS]# rpm -ihv autoconf-2.61-9.noarch.rpm Preparing...### [100%] 1:autoconf ### [100%] error: unpacking of archive failed: cpio: Bad magic [EMAIL PROTECTED] RPMS]# [EMAIL PROTECTED] RPMS]# rpm -ihvvv autoconf-2.61-9.noarch.rpm D: == autoconf-2.61-9.noarch.rpm D: Expected size: 827801 = lead(96)+sigs(180)+pad(4)+data(827521) D: Actual size: 827801 D: autoconf-2.61-9.noarch.rpm: Header SHA1 digest: OK (1096335571ff4a49cf8c3b361161254c09a1c0f8) D: added binary package [0] D: found 0 source and 1 binary packages D: opening db environment /var/lib/rpm/Packages cdb:mpool D: opening db index /var/lib/rpm/Packages rdonly mode=0x0 D: locked db index /var/lib/rpm/Packages D: == +++ autoconf-2.61-9 noarch/linux 0x0 D: opening db index /var/lib/rpm/Depends create mode=0x0 D: opening db index /var/lib/rpm/Basenames rdonly mode=0x0 D: read h#1071 Header SHA1 digest: OK (7e960413be7abeba8778d1bab64f1e6cbbeeb88c) D: Requires: /bin/awk YES (db files) D: read h#1115 Header SHA1 digest: OK (5aca719fedbae2220cead65afc13bf9226b6e818) D: Requires: /bin/sh YES (db files) D: Requires: /bin/sh YES (cached) D: Requires: /bin/sh YES (cached) D: read h# 863 Header SHA1 digest: OK (38ce8cea546f83d017e001ff79a9b83710622b0d) D: Requires: /usr/bin/perl YES (db files) D: opening db index /var/lib/rpm/Providename rdonly mode=0x0 D: read h# 975 Header SHA1 digest: OK (034e288283eb299655a8702b26cbe2a685464d0f) D: Requires: diffutils YES (db provides) D: read h#1105 Header SHA1 digest: OK (5d3547d13b0c02de3b3cc81a616a00c29a53b34d) D: Requires: m4 = 3:1.4.10 YES (db provides) D: read h#1102 Header SHA1 digest: OK (e6add778369f676d01257bbfc86f96fa28538059) D: Requires: mktempYES (db provides) D: Requires: perl(Autom4te::C4che) YES (added provide) D: Requires: perl(Autom4te::ChannelDefs) YES (added provide) D: Requires: perl(Autom4te::Channels) YES (added provide) D: Requires: perl(Autom4te::Configure_ac) YES (added provide) D: Requires: perl(Autom4te::FileUtils) YES (added provide) D: Requires: perl(Autom4te::General) YES (added provide) D: Requires: perl(Autom4te::Request) YES (added provide) D: Requires: perl(Autom4te::Struct)YES (added provide) D: Requires: perl(Autom4te::XFile) YES (added provide) D: Requires: perl(Carp)YES (db provides) D: Requires: perl(Cwd) YES (db provides) D: read h# 864 Header SHA1 digest: OK (15fe68908580bc2ec87cf52922a2315a454006c2) D: Requires: perl(Data::Dumper)YES (db provides) D: Requires: perl(DynaLoader) YES (db provides) D: Requires: perl(Errno) YES (db provides) D: Requires: perl(Exporter)YES (db provides) D: Requires: perl(File::Basename) YES (db provides) D: Requires: perl(File::Compare) YES (db provides) D: Requires: perl(File::Copy) YES (db provides) D: Requires: perl(File::Find) YES (db provides) D: Requires: perl(File::Path) YES (db provides) D: Requires: perl(File::stat) YES (db provides) D: Requires: perl(Getopt::Long)YES (db provides) D: Requires: perl(IO::File)YES (db provides) D: Requires: perl(POSIX) YES (db provides) D: Requires: perl(Text::ParseWords)YES (db provides) D: Requires: perl(strict) YES (db provides) D: Requires: perl(vars)YES (db provides) D: Requires: perl-base = 0:5.000 YES (db provides) D: Requires: perl-base = 0:5.005 YES (db provides) D: Requires: perl-base = 0:5.005_03
Re: [Th] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeff Johnson napisał(a): This is likely the -pie linkage and -fpie compilation, new in rpm-4.4.9. Remove PIE compilation/linkage is the easy fix. Upgrading binutils and/or rewriting rpm code may help. 73 de Jeff removed and it's built right now, btw binutils are current. -- T. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: Fwd: [CVS] RPM: rpm/rpmdb/ rpmdb.c
Jeff Johnson napisał(a): Ok with this patch and without pie stuff on sparc64. One issue remaining on my sparc64 - I cannot use %_binary_payloadw9.lzdio. When I build package with lzdio I have: Upgrading... 1:autoconf ### [100%] error: unpacking of archive failed: cpio: Bad magic When using bzdio it's ok. -- T. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: ftp.iso.pld-linux.org]
Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: Piotr Skwarna wrote: Andrzej Krzysztofowicz napisaĹ?(a): Piotr Skwarna wrote: Andrzej Krzysztofowicz napisaÄšďż˝(a): Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?= wrote: ftp.iso.pld-linux.org is not answering is it planned downtime? when it will be up? Probably never. We lost the machine. so, where can I / user find pld install cd ? On the main ftp(s) ? Connected to ftp.atm.pld-linux.org. 220 (vsFTPd 2.0.3) Name (ftp.pld-linux.org:spider): anonymous 331 Please specify the password. Password: 230- 230- 230- ___ _ ___ 230- | _ \ | | \ 230- | _/ |__| |) | Linux Project 230- |_| ||___/ Main FTP Archive 230- 230- Additional access is at http://www.pld-linux.org/distrib/ftp. 230- For questions and other contact mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 230- 230- On This Site: 230- /dists/ PLD Distribution Versions 230- /dists/1.0/ 1.0 Ra stable version 230- /dists/1.0/test/ Test and Experimental RPM packages for 1.0 Ra 230- /dists/1.0/updates/ Updates for PLD 1.0 Ra 230- /dists/2.0/ 2.0 Ac new version 230- /dists/2.0/supported/ Supported RPM packages for 2.0 Ac 230- /dists/2.0/test/ Test and Experimental RPM packages for 2.0 Ac 230- /dists/2.0/updates/ Updates for PLD 2.0 Ac 230- /software/ Various Software Projects 230- /people/ Developers stuff 230- /pool/ Packages Pool 230- 230- PLD ISO images are on ftp://ftp.iso.pld-linux.org/ 230- 230 Login successful. Remote system type is UNIX. Using binary mode to transfer files. [...] ftp pwd 257 /iso ftp ls 200 PORT command successful. Consider using PASV. 150 Here comes the directory listing. -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 544 Feb 12 2005 README.en -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 583 Feb 12 2005 README.pl -rw-rw-r-- 1 0 0 168 May 24 2004 readme.en.txt -rw-rw-r-- 1 0 0 184 May 24 2004 readme.pl.txt Try another mirror. At least ftp1 and ftp2 contain ISOs. And we are waiting for a sponsor... What amount of disk space is required ? I could host it on 10Mbit. Regards. -- tomek ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
env-update and umask
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# chmod 644 /etc/*.env [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ls /etc/*.env -la -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 211 Sep 5 19:43 /etc/csh.env -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 213 Sep 5 19:43 /etc/profile.env [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# env-update [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ls /etc/*.env -la -rw--- 1 root root 211 Sep 5 19:48 /etc/csh.env -rw--- 1 root root 213 Sep 5 19:48 /etc/profile.env [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# umask 0077 I think it's default umask in PLD, anyway it should not be depended on umask. Regards. -- Tomek ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: nocc.spec - don't install apache config to lighttpd
glen wrote: Author: glen Date: Tue Jul 18 16:13:57 2006 GMT Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD Log message: - don't install apache config to lighttpd Files affected: SPECS: nocc.spec (1.33 - 1.34) Such example exists in template-webapp.spec So maybe fix template too. -- Regards T. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: nocc.spec - don't install apache config to lighttpd
Tomasz Mateja wrote: glen wrote: Author: glen Date: Tue Jul 18 16:13:57 2006 GMT Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD Log message: - don't install apache config to lighttpd Files affected: SPECS: nocc.spec (1.33 - 1.34) Such example exists in template-webapp.spec So maybe fix template too. Hehehehe you're too fast for me :) -- T. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
