Re: Th builders - don't send request
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 10:04:39PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
Please do not send any upgrade requests to th builders. Only test builds are
allowed until we solve th-i486 issue.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:pld-builder.new/config/acl.conf ?
--
RegardsHavner {jid,mail}:havner(at)pld-linux.org
PLD developerhttp://www.pld-linux.org
PLD LiveCD author http://livecd.pld-linux.org
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: kernel devel provides obsoletes
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 04:52:23PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
why *-module-build conflicts with other *-module-build but doesn't obsolete
each other?
Where do they conflict? They only do if its the same kernel version,
different release, otherwise they go to /usr/src/linux-$version and
everything is fine.
--
RegardsHavner {jid,mail}:havner(at)pld-linux.org
PLD developerhttp://www.pld-linux.org
PLD LiveCD author http://livecd.pld-linux.org
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: kernel devel provides obsoletes
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 05:10:50PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
%package headers
Provides: kernel-i2c-devel
Obsoletes: kernel-i2c-devel
If that worked as it should you wouldn't have conflicts but proper
obsoletes.
They only do if its the same kernel version,
different release, otherwise they go to /usr/src/linux-$version and
everything is fine.
are you suggesting it's poldek bug?
I'm not suggesting anything :-)
I just know i had kernel-build for 2 kernels installed at the same
moment without any conflicts (some recent 2.6). I remember changing
/usr/src/linux symlink for building modules for different kernels and i
dont use nodeps/force. So it seems it was ok.
--
RegardsHavner {jid,mail}:havner(at)pld-linux.org
PLD developerhttp://www.pld-linux.org
PLD LiveCD author http://livecd.pld-linux.org
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: rpm-build-macros.spec - 1.316: added %env_update
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 11:03:25PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
Ok, i see its optional now, just in what way its better? Moving from
separate config files to one, that needs to be updated.
well. hope this explains:
It doesn't :-)
0.013 in worst case, you wont have time to blink during that time ;-P
--
RegardsHavner {jid,mail}:havner(at)pld-linux.org
PLD developerhttp://www.pld-linux.org
PLD LiveCD author http://livecd.pld-linux.org
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
python 2.5
error: python-devel-2.5-0.c1.1: req /usr/bin/python2.5 not found
poldek:/all-avail search -f /usr/bin/python2.5
Searching packages..done.
No package matches '/usr/bin/python2.5'
--
RegardsHavner {jid,mail}:havner(at)pld-linux.org
PLD developerhttp://www.pld-linux.org
PLD LiveCD author http://livecd.pld-linux.org
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [th] apache-base requires /etc/monit
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:00:51PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
Move it to filesystem.spec imo, the same with /etc/logrotate.d (not
everyone might want to have it and some core applications provide
configs for it)
Wouldn't monit-apache subpackage be better? We don't end up with tons of
application specific directories in filesystem.spec.
I'd prefer more or less generic dirs in one package then _tons_ of
single one dir packages.
--
RegardsHavner {jid,mail}:havner(at)pld-linux.org
PLD developerhttp://www.pld-linux.org
PLD LiveCD author http://livecd.pld-linux.org
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [th] apache-base requires /etc/monit
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:31:57PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
The *dir* should be only in monit.spec package while apache config file for
monit in monit-apache subpackage.
True, sorry for misunderstanding.
--
RegardsHavner {jid,mail}:havner(at)pld-linux.org
PLD developerhttp://www.pld-linux.org
PLD LiveCD author http://livecd.pld-linux.org
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [STBR] AC
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 12:05:48AM +0200, Adam Gołębiowski wrote:
php4-eaccelerator.spec:AC-branch (needs rebuilt)
x11vnc.spec:AC-branch (CVE-2006-2450)
vim.spec:AC-branch(bugfixes)
apache-mod_cband.spec:AC-branch (bugfixes)
kcheckgmail.spec:AC-branch(new package)
anyone?
sent
--
RegardsHavner {jid,mail}:havner(at)pld-linux.org
PLD developerhttp://www.pld-linux.org
PLD LiveCD author http://livecd.pld-linux.org
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [STBR] AC
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 01:15:49AM +0200, Paweł Gołaszewski wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Adam Gołębiowski wrote:
php4-eaccelerator.spec:AC-branch(needs rebuilt)
php-eaccelerator.spec (new version - works really better, with full php5
support)
Sent, next time rebranch before requesting.
--
RegardsHavner {jid,mail}:havner(at)pld-linux.org
PLD developerhttp://www.pld-linux.org
PLD LiveCD author http://livecd.pld-linux.org
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SOURCES: rpm-macros.patch - --as-needed by default
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 09:26:27AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On Monday 24 July 2006 05:44, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
does the --as-needed work also for Ac gcc?
anybody can answer this?
Is it gcc option? It should be linker (and is in ld manual). Tho i'm not
sure how is passed to it (maybe through gcc :-))
--
RegardsHavner {jid,mail}:havner(at)pld-linux.org
PLD developerhttp://www.pld-linux.org
PLD LiveCD author http://livecd.pld-linux.org
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
gtkmozembed (mozilla-firefox) i czcionki
Chyba jest jakas nielogicznosc w wybieraniu czcionek przez embed
firefoxa.
X11-fonts-100dpi-6.9.0-1
X11-fonts-100dpi-ISO8859-1-6.9.0-1
X11-fonts-100dpi-ISO8859-2-6.9.0-1
X11-fonts-75dpi-6.9.0-1
X11-fonts-75dpi-ISO8859-1-6.9.0-1
X11-fonts-75dpi-ISO8859-2-6.9.0-1
X11-fonts-ISO8859-1-6.9.0-1
X11-fonts-ISO8859-2-6.9.0-1
fonts-TTF-microsoft-20020525-7wla
Mam zainstalowane i dzialajace Helvetica,Arial,Verdana (zarowno iso1 jak
i iso2). Na potrzeb testow korzystam tylko z domyslnego
/etc/fonts/fonts.conf
Z tego co rozumiem i widze jak dziala jesli aplikacja (korzystajaca z
czcionek przez fontconfig) chce czcionki Sans (sans-serif). Dobierana
jest pierwsza czcionka z listy w fonts.conf
alias
familysans-serif/family
prefer
familyBitstream Vera Sans/family
familyVerdana/family
familyArial/family
familyAlbany AMT/family
(...)
I generalnie dziala to jak powinno dla aplikacji GTK/QT czy wszelkich
innych. Jak zmieniam ta kolejnosc, sans zmienia sie odpowiednio.
Problem napotkalem z gtkmozembed w wykonaniu firefoxa (z mozilla chyba
tego nie byloi). Przyklad yelp:
http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~havner/yelp-helvetica.png
Zamiast Verdany wyswietlil Helvetica. Zadnymi kombinacjami z fonts.conf
nie udalo mi sie tego poprawic. Natomiast kiedy zablokuje w fontconfigu
wszystkie czcionki bitmapowe lub po prostu je odinstaluje wyswietla
poprawnie. Reaguje nawet na zmiany w kolejnosci w fonts.conf.
Od razu mowie nie jest to wina yelpa bo np epiphany czy liferea-mozilla
zachowuja sie identycznie.
Wyglada to tak jakby gtkmozembed mialo na sztywno pobieranie Helvetica
dla serif i Time dla sans (tu jest ten sam problem, z monospace nie
wystepuje) zanim skorzysta z kolenosci w fonts.conf.
Ma ktos jakis pomysl, albo chociaz sugestie gdzie tego szukac?
Workaroundy w stylu blokady czcionek bitmapowych nie wchodza w gre, bo
korzystam z jednej przez fontconfig, zreszta bardziej interesuje mnie co
jest nie tak.
--
RegardsHavner {jid,mail}:havner(at)pld-linux.org
PLD developerhttp://www.pld-linux.org
PLD LiveCD author http://livecd.pld-linux.org
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: gtkmozembed (mozilla-firefox) i czcionki
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 05:42:38AM +0200, havner wrote:
Sorry, this was supposed to go to -pl list.
--
RegardsHavner {jid,mail}:havner(at)pld-linux.org
PLD developerhttp://www.pld-linux.org
PLD LiveCD author http://livecd.pld-linux.org
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: pwdutils.spec - /etc/skel/tmp added - rel 3
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 11:22:21AM +0200, Paweł Gołaszewski wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jul 2006, havner wrote:
- /etc/skel/tmp added
[...]
-install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/{rc.d/init.d,pwdutils,security,skel}
+install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/{rc.d/init.d,pwdutils,security,skel/tmp}
[...]
+%dir /etc/skel/tmp
[...]
filesystem.spec or some setup.spec?
shadow.spec:
Revision 1.99 2004/09/28 12:49:47 blues
- added /etc/skel/tmp
--
RegardsHavner {jid,mail}:havner(at)pld-linux.org
PLD developerhttp://www.pld-linux.org
PLD LiveCD author http://livecd.pld-linux.org
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
udev(cdr/cdrw)
Anyone against such patch?
IMO users should have rw access to CD devices, not only for writing.
F.e. cdaudio or eject requires them as well. Maybe group name is not the
best now, but it doesn't matter that much.
Index: udev.rules
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/SOURCES/udev.rules,v
retrieving revision 1.37
diff -u -r1.37 udev.rules
--- udev.rules 10 May 2006 18:38:30 - 1.37
+++ udev.rules 4 Jul 2006 12:21:16 -
@@ -41,9 +41,9 @@
BUS==scsi, KERNEL==sr[0-9]*, ACTION==add, IMPORT=cdrom_id
--export $tempnode
BUS==scsi, KERNEL==scd[a-z], ACTION==add, IMPORT=cdrom_id
--export $tempnode
-ENV{ID_CDROM}==?*, SYMLINK+=cdrom, GROUP=disk
+ENV{ID_CDROM}==?*, SYMLINK+=cdrom, GROUP=cdwrite
ENV{ID_CDROM_CD_RW}==?*, SYMLINK+=cdrw,GROUP=cdwrite
-ENV{ID_CDROM_DVD}==?*, SYMLINK+=dvd, GROUP=disk
+ENV{ID_CDROM_DVD}==?*, SYMLINK+=dvd, GROUP=cdwrite
ENV{ID_CDROM_DVD_R}==?*, SYMLINK+=dvdrw, GROUP=cdwrite
LABEL=ide_end
--
RegardsHavner {jid,mail}:havner(at)pld-linux.org
PLD developerhttp://www.pld-linux.org
PLD LiveCD author http://livecd.pld-linux.org
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: ANN: Closing AC
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 03:01:01PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dnia Fri, 16 Dec 2005 12:32:06 +0100, Tomasz Pala [EMAIL PROTECTED]
napisał:
Because some people tried to convince me, that it is done and we must
only adapt some scripting to PLD. So if it exists I wanted to know how
it works. It turned out that there's noone here who knows anything more
than 'parallel' and 'dependencies'.
How long will You keep insulting me? Where have I stated, that there
already is a list of requirements? Stop fucking trolling and putting down
something, which You aren't even interested in - would Ya? What is it that
You know about it, which makes You accuse ppl of not knowing of? You
haven't even bothered to look into specs that are already made and still
You keep on jumping to conclusions and giving facts about things, You
haven't even seen?
Ok, thank you, with this mail you just found a nice place in my
.procmailrc called /dev/drzewo. Too long of YOUR trolling on this list you
allmighty, smart aleck.
Or maybe just someone interested will check initNG or other really
existing projects? ;
Or maby You just shut up and stop criticising things You haven't even
bothered to check up would Ya?
would Ya Where do people take from such a language? Slams?
--
RegardsHavner {jid,mail}:havner(at)pld-linux.org
PLD developerhttp://www.pld-linux.org
PLD LiveCD author http://livecd.pld-linux.org
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: poldek / iptables
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 01:50:03PM +0100, havner wrote:
2. iptables
czemu jest:
Release:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
przeciez iptables budowane sa na llh, nie kernel-headers. Nawet w
requires maja:
Requires: kernel(netfilter) = %{_pomng_snap}
(nie konkretny kernel a netfilter, ktore brany jest z llh)
po co ten dodatkowy release z wersja kernela?
A nie, jednak jest budowany na kernel-headers..
BuildRequires: kernel-headers(netfilter) = %{_pomng_snap}
od kiedy tak? przeciez zawsze ztcp trzeba bylo czekac na llh z netfiltrem
zeby iptables zbudowac. cos mnie chyba ominelo.
--
RegardsHavner {jid,mail}:havner(at)pld-linux.org
PLD developerhttp://www.pld-linux.org
PLD LiveCD author http://livecd.pld-linux.org
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: poldek / iptables
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 01:50:03PM +0100, havner wrote:
Dwie sprawy.
Arg, sorry, this was supposed to go to devel-pl.
--
RegardsHavner {jid,mail}:havner(at)pld-linux.org
PLD developerhttp://www.pld-linux.org
PLD LiveCD author http://livecd.pld-linux.org
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: aspell
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:42:50PM +0100, Paweł Gołaszewski wrote:
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
aspell 0.60 to Ac?
what is the reason for 0.50 right now?
We had some problems with aspell 0.60.
aspell 0.60 was in AC some time ago, we decided to downgrade cause there
was not many new features and it was significantly slower.
--
RegardsHavner {jid,mail}:havner(at)pld-linux.org
PLD developerhttp://www.pld-linux.org
PLD LiveCD author http://livecd.pld-linux.org
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS (AC-branch): poldek.spec - also package info file - BTW, why...
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 01:21:10PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On Wednesday 27 July 2005 13:07, havner wrote:
Author: havner Date: Wed Jul 27 10:07:34 2005 GMT
Module: SPECS Tag: AC-branch
Log message:
- also package info file
doesn't adding info files to package require you to call fix-info-dir?
yeah, fixed.
- BTW, why there is rel 1?? poldek 0.19 is not relased yet, there should
be still 0.%snap.1 release
fix it :)
Its not a matter of fixing it, i wanted to know authors intentions in
putting this rel here, cause it suggest that poldek 0.19 has been
release while its not true.
--
RegardsHavner {jid,mail}:havner(at)pld-linux.org
PLD developerhttp://www.pld-linux.org
PLD LiveCD author http://livecd.pld-linux.org
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS (AC-branch): poldek.spec - also package info file - BTW, why...
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 12:35:59PM +0200, havner wrote:
Its not a matter of fixing it, i wanted to know authors intentions in
putting this rel here, cause it suggest that poldek 0.19 has been
release while its not true.
s/suggest/suggests/;s/release/released/
sorry for kloczkish ;-)
--
RegardsHavner {jid,mail}:havner(at)pld-linux.org
PLD developerhttp://www.pld-linux.org
PLD LiveCD author http://livecd.pld-linux.org
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: applnk.spec
Sorry, that was supposed to go on -pl list.
--
RegardsHavner {jid,mail}:havner(at)pld-linux.org
PLD developerhttp://www.pld-linux.org
PLD LiveCD author http://livecd.pld-linux.org
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
