Re: [PLUG] Clinic on Sunday ??

2009-11-14 Thread Keith Lofstrom
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 06:33:05PM -0800, William A Morita wrote:
> Clinic on Sunday ??

I announced it on plug-announce on Thursday.  I got a reply
from Gilbert, so It made it to Guatemala.  Should I repeat
announcements on the plug list, or should people wanting to
see meeting announcements sign up for the plug-announce list?

Keith

-- 
Keith Lofstrom  kei...@keithl.com Voice (503)-520-1993
KLIC --- Keith Lofstrom Integrated Circuits --- "Your Ideas in Silicon"
Design Contracting in Bipolar and CMOS - Analog, Digital, and Scan ICs
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Film scanners

2009-11-14 Thread m0gely
Denis Heidtmann wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Rich Shepard  
> wrote:
> ..
>>Candidly, you'd be much better off (and spend less time and money) by
>> replacing that with a scanner known to work with Xsane. Check
>> http://www.sane-project.org/ for supported scanners; there are dozens of
>> them.
>>
>> Rich
>
> I am getting frustrated by this effort.  The SANE site lists 248
> scanners with a "complete" rating.  Of those I count 97 as USB.  Of
> those, I started searching for Epson, which had 20 meeting the
> criterion.  NONE of those are film scanners on the Epson site.
>
> I tried HP; got similar results. Fujitsu, Genius, Avision the same.
> What am I missing?  Either the model numbers have changed or SANE is
> out of date. (I did find a site that said "Since Microtek, Polaroid,
> Minolta and now Nikon discontinued their film scanners, there is not a
> lot of choice left in affordable, good quality 35mm scanners."
>
> Can anybody recommend a film scanner using USB with a "complete" SANE rating?

Coolscan IV

Several on eBay.

-- 
m0gely
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] i can't believe this hasn't come up before

2009-11-14 Thread Joe Pruett
> Is this realization triggered by the recent Wordpress issue?
>
>  http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2009/Nov/141
>  http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2009/Nov/148
>
>
> The whole concept of placing executable text files in a web root and
> then allowing one to mix them with non-executable content (HTML,
> images, css, etc) is a pretty insane.  Yes, I know, everyone does it
> on nearly every platform, but that doesn't make it good.  Anytime you
> take static content and mix it with executable content, and then
> intentionally blur the line between the two, it's a recipe for
> disaster.  (Examples: MS office macro viruses, PDF+JavaScript,
> HTML+JavaScript, Flash+JavaScript, ...)
>
> Never trust your distro's defaults for Apache httpd.  They're almost
> always not right for you, and many distros continue to enable entirely
> too many "features" that no one ever uses.
>
>
> If you're writing an app for file uploads here are some approaches to
> keep it safe (in order of preference):
>
> A. Don't allow file uploads.  Find a way around it.
>
> B. Allow file uploads, but don't store files on disk.  Instead,
>   capture the uploaded file name an contents and store them in
>   database records.
>
> C. Store the file on disk, but *do not* use the provided file name to
>   store it.  Instead, store a record in the database which includes
>   the name of the file provided by the user, a unique identifier for
>   the file, and any other attributes you care to.  Ensure that you:
>
>1. Do not store the contents of the file under the web root at
>   all.  Use a separate script to download the file based on the
>   unique identifier.
>
>2. Use a file name based on the unique identifier that your code
>   generated during the upload.
>
> In cases B and C, watch out for SQL injection, cross-site scripting,
> and HTTP header injection.  Oh, not to mention, are users uploading
> files that contain viruses or trojans?  Are you becoming an accomplice
> to attacks from one user to another?  (Option A becomes more appealing
> now.)
>
>
> On the topic of badly designed PHP apps that allow file uploads, if
> any of you host osCommerce installations or apps derived from hit, you
> definitely want to take a look at this thread:
>  http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2009/Nov/169

yes, the wordpress alert was what triggered me to look at things more 
closely.  allowing someone to upload a jpg/gif/etc into a web space is a 
pretty standard thing.  and i doubt that most programmers would think that 
foo.php.jpg would be run by the php system.  the methods you list are 
certainly other ways around the issue.  but that isn't going to fix all 
the apps that are out there already.  from what i can tell, using the 
filematch apache method will deal with all of them.  there is a similar 
issue with addhandler being used for .cgi files, but that requires extra 
file permissions as well as other apache setup, so that is far less likely 
to be a problem for foo.cgi.jpg files.
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Clinic on Sunday ??

2009-11-14 Thread John Jason Jordan
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:33:05 -0800
"William A Morita"  dijo:

> Clinic on Sunday ??

Indeed, there is a Clinic tomorrow.

I regret the failure to announce earlier. My excuse is that I have been
swamped with a construction project. But I will be there.
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Network failure

2009-11-14 Thread drew wymore
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Denis Heidtmann
wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 11:16 AM, drew wymore 
> wrote:
> ...
> >
> > Denis,
> > What kind of DSL modem is it, who's your ISP?
>
> It is an Actiontec R1524SU.  I use dslnorthwest.
>
> -Denis
> ___
> PLUG mailing list
> PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
> http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
>

Hmm. There might be some system logs on the Actiontec to help determine if
it is indeed the modem failing, it sounds like it's either PPPoE/A or routed
with the 192.x.x.x addresses. If you need a modem to test with, I have an
Actiontec that is known to be good and you can swap it in and see what
happens. The 1524 is the little gray one right? Are you running a switch or
using the built in ethernet?

Drew-
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


[PLUG] Clinic on Sunday

2009-11-14 Thread William A Morita
Bring your 2G USB drive and I can make it bootable into Ubuntu 9.10 with
persistence.

- Bill Morita


-Original Message-
From: plug-boun...@lists.pdxlinux.org
[mailto:plug-boun...@lists.pdxlinux.org] On Behalf Of wes
Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 6:43 PM
To: General Linux/UNIX discussion and help,civil and on-topic
Subject: Re: [PLUG] Clinic on Sunday ??

I'll be there. I'm planning to bring a friend from India :)

-wes

On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 6:33 PM, William A Morita
wrote:

> Clinic on Sunday ??
>
> - Bill
> wamorita At hevanet.com
>
>
>
> ___
> PLUG mailing list
> PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
> http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
>
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug



___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Clinic on Sunday ??

2009-11-14 Thread wes
I'll be there. I'm planning to bring a friend from India :)

-wes

On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 6:33 PM, William A Morita wrote:

> Clinic on Sunday ??
>
> - Bill
> wamorita At hevanet.com
>
>
>
> ___
> PLUG mailing list
> PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
> http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
>
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


[PLUG] Clinic on Sunday ??

2009-11-14 Thread William A Morita
Clinic on Sunday ??

- Bill 
wamorita At hevanet.com



___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] dial-up

2009-11-14 Thread Fred James
linux-yug wrote:
> Hi
>
> Does anyone have experience with USB dial-up modem and Ubuntu
>
>
> Ya..I am on dial-up and I suspect my modem is going bad..  I have
> problems connecting every now and again..
>
>
> TIA
>
>
> linux-yug
>   
linux-yug
No experience with USB modem, but with modems in general ... you say 
"problems connecting every now and again"?
Do you get any error message(s)?
Can you hear the process (dial tone, dialing, ring, connect chat)?
These things could provide a clue.  I have had modems physically fail, 
but rarely - if you don't fry it, or drown it, or take a hammer to it, 
there really isn't much in them to go wrong.
Other than a faulty telco line, the usual suspects are physical 
connections (as in: remove and reseat - and you might include: inspect 
for signs of wear, breakage, corrosion, or misalignment).
Also, if you need it, one can initialize a call from the command line 
and view the chat on screen (redirecting to a file is also possible, of 
course).
Hope this helps
Regards
Fred James

___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


[PLUG] dial-up

2009-11-14 Thread linux-yug
Hi

Does anyone have experience with USB dial-up modem and Ubuntu


Ya..I am on dial-up and I suspect my modem is going bad..  I have
problems connecting every now and again..


TIA


linux-yug



___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] i can't believe this hasn't come up before

2009-11-14 Thread Tim
> if you use the apache addhandler command for things like php, perl, python, 
> etc 
> it can create a huge hole if you allow uploads into your web space (images 
> for 
> example).  the unbelievable behavior is that addhandler (and other friends 
> from 
> mod_mime) look for the extension anywhere in the filename, not just the end. 
> so foo.php.jpg will be run as php if addhandler is used for .php (which is 
> the 
> default for redhat 5 systems).
> 
> a workaround is to use:
> 
> 
>   SetHandler php5-script
>   ForceType text/html
> 
> 
> instead.  wow, this is just scary...

Yup.

Is this realization triggered by the recent Wordpress issue?

  http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2009/Nov/141
  http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2009/Nov/148


The whole concept of placing executable text files in a web root and
then allowing one to mix them with non-executable content (HTML,
images, css, etc) is a pretty insane.  Yes, I know, everyone does it
on nearly every platform, but that doesn't make it good.  Anytime you
take static content and mix it with executable content, and then
intentionally blur the line between the two, it's a recipe for
disaster.  (Examples: MS office macro viruses, PDF+JavaScript,
HTML+JavaScript, Flash+JavaScript, ...)

Never trust your distro's defaults for Apache httpd.  They're almost
always not right for you, and many distros continue to enable entirely
too many "features" that no one ever uses.


If you're writing an app for file uploads here are some approaches to
keep it safe (in order of preference):

A. Don't allow file uploads.  Find a way around it.

B. Allow file uploads, but don't store files on disk.  Instead,
   capture the uploaded file name an contents and store them in
   database records.

C. Store the file on disk, but *do not* use the provided file name to
   store it.  Instead, store a record in the database which includes
   the name of the file provided by the user, a unique identifier for
   the file, and any other attributes you care to.  Ensure that you:

1. Do not store the contents of the file under the web root at
   all.  Use a separate script to download the file based on the
   unique identifier.

2. Use a file name based on the unique identifier that your code
   generated during the upload.

In cases B and C, watch out for SQL injection, cross-site scripting,
and HTTP header injection.  Oh, not to mention, are users uploading
files that contain viruses or trojans?  Are you becoming an accomplice
to attacks from one user to another?  (Option A becomes more appealing
now.)


On the topic of badly designed PHP apps that allow file uploads, if
any of you host osCommerce installations or apps derived from hit, you
definitely want to take a look at this thread:
  http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2009/Nov/169


Ok, I've rambled long enough.
tim
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Network failure

2009-11-14 Thread Denis Heidtmann
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 11:16 AM, drew wymore  wrote:
...
>
> Denis,
> What kind of DSL modem is it, who's your ISP?

It is an Actiontec R1524SU.  I use dslnorthwest.

-Denis
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Network failure

2009-11-14 Thread linux-yug
On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 14:13 -0800, Larry Brigman wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 12:30 PM, linux-yug  wrote:
> >
> >
> >  169.254.xx.xx  is NOt a good  IP address..
> >
> 
> Actually it is but not for getting out to the Internet.  It is the
> zero-conf networking address.
> It is valid for local area networks but is (should be) dropped at the router.


Thank You

That was what I meant to say..

I always  use it in trouble shooting..Tells me the  Computer is not
getting to DHCP

TIA
Linux-yug

___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Network failure

2009-11-14 Thread Larry Brigman
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 12:30 PM, linux-yug  wrote:
>
>
>  169.254.xx.xx  is NOt a good  IP address..
>

Actually it is but not for getting out to the Internet.  It is the
zero-conf networking address.
It is valid for local area networks but is (should be) dropped at the router.
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Network failure - 169.254.xx.xx

2009-11-14 Thread Michael Rasmussen
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 12:30:38PM -0800, linux-yug wrote:
>   169.254.xx.xx  is NOt a good  IP address..
 
RFC 3330 begs to differ.

http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3330.html

169.254.0.0/16 - This is the "link local" block.  It is allocated for
communication between hosts on a single link.  Hosts obtain these
addresses by auto-configuration, such as when a DHCP server may not
be found.


-- 
  Michael Rasmussen, Portland Oregon  
Be appropriate && Follow your curiosity
  http://www.jamhome.us/
  The fortune cookie says:
To be or not to be.
-- Shakespeare
To do is to be.
-- Nietzsche
To be is to do.
-- Sartre
Do be do be do.
-- Sinatra

___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Network failure

2009-11-14 Thread linux-yug
On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 11:13 -0800, Denis Heidtmann wrote:
> Trying to understand what happened to my network on Sep 21, 2009, and
> actions to take if it happens again.
> 
> Background: Running Ubuntu 9.04 with NetworkManager
> (http://projects.gnome.org/NetworkManager/)
> DSL modem.  No wireless.
> 
> On 9/21/09 all network communication failed.  I power cycled the modem
> to no effect.  My son changed /etc/network/interfaces from:
> auto lo
> 
> iface lo inet loopback
> 
> 
> to:
> auto lo
> 
> iface lo inet loopback
> 
> 
> 
> auto eth0
> 
> iface eth0 inet dhcp
> 
> 
> After restarting the network was restored, but the NetworkManager
> applet which displays the network status on the task bar shows the
> network as not functional.
> 
> Since this occurrence I have had two more times that the network
> failed.  In both cases after shutting down for an hour or so then
> restarting the network came back up functional.  During one of these
> most recent failures, I looked at a GUI which displays, among other
> things, Netstat outputs.
> 
>  When it had failed:
> 
> 
> 
>   Destination GatewayNetmask  Interface
> 
>   169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0   255.255.0.0 eth0
> 
>   0.0.0.0 0.0.0.00.0.0.0 eth0
> 
>   fe80::  ::64eth0
> 
>   ...snip...
> 
> When it was functional:
> 
> 
> 
>   Destination Gateway  Netmask Interface
> 
>   192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0  255.255.255.0   eth0
> 
>   169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0  255.255.0.0 eth0
> 
>   0.0.0.0   192.168.0.1   0.0.0.0 eth0
> 
>   fe80::   ::64eth0
> 
>   ...snip...
> 
> 
> The spontaneous fixes since the first occurrence leads me to consider
> the possibility that Evan's edit of /etc/network/interfaces did not
> fix the issue, but only served to break the NetworkManager applet.
> 
> I am interested in having a bag of diagnostic tricks at the ready when
> it happens again.  High on my list of suspects is the DSL modem.  I am
> also interested in restoring the NetworkManager applet to function.
> 
> Suggestions?
> 
> -Denis



  169.254.xx.xx  is NOt a good  IP address..

HTH

Linux-yug

___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] how-to on precinct mapping

2009-11-14 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009, Randy Stapilus wrote:

> I do a fair amount of political voter precinct analysis, and a way of
> easily mapping the results would be very helpful.

> Question - might there be some better way to automate this? If there is, a
> lot of people in the political world would be extremely interested.

   Wander over to http://grass.osgeo.org/ and grab a copy of grass-6.4RC5;
actually, get the latest from the svn server or yesterday's weekly snapshot.

   You can get map data from the Oregon Geospatial Enterprise Office (OR GEO)
at http://www.oregon.gov/DAS/EISPD/GEO/sdlibrary.shtml. You can find
congressional districts, county boundaries, cities, census data, etc.

   You can even color the resulting maps red and blue!

Rich

___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


[PLUG] how-to on precinct mapping

2009-11-14 Thread Randy Stapilus
I do a fair amount of political voter precinct analysis, and a way of  
easily mapping the results would be very helpful. So I was interested  
in a piece in the Boise Weekly (the Idaho alternative paper) wherein  
one of the reporters, Nathaniel Hoffman, tried to develop an approach  
for doing that, using mostly (though not entirely) open source  
options, including OpenOffice Calc and Qgis (I believe it's open  
source).

The process he used was pretty involved and time-consuming, though,  
and used a bunch of conversions - it's certainly not simple. He  
writes about it at http://www.boiseweekly.com/boise/mapping-city- 
council-races/Content?oid=1297504

Question - might there be some better way to automate this? If there  
is, a lot of people in the political world would be extremely  
interested.

Randy Stapilus
www.ridenbaugh.com
Northwest politics and public affairs
WA, OR, ID Public Affairs Digests




___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Network failure

2009-11-14 Thread drew wymore
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Denis Heidtmann  wrote:

> Trying to understand what happened to my network on Sep 21, 2009, and
> actions to take if it happens again.
>
> Background: Running Ubuntu 9.04 with NetworkManager
> (http://projects.gnome.org/NetworkManager/)
> DSL modem.  No wireless.
>
> On 9/21/09 all network communication failed.  I power cycled the modem
> to no effect.  My son changed /etc/network/interfaces from:
> auto lo
>
> iface lo inet loopback
>
>
> to:
> auto lo
>
> iface lo inet loopback
>
>
>
> auto eth0
>
> iface eth0 inet dhcp
>
>
> After restarting the network was restored, but the NetworkManager
> applet which displays the network status on the task bar shows the
> network as not functional.
>
> Since this occurrence I have had two more times that the network
> failed.  In both cases after shutting down for an hour or so then
> restarting the network came back up functional.  During one of these
> most recent failures, I looked at a GUI which displays, among other
> things, Netstat outputs.
>
>  When it had failed:
>
>
>
>  Destination GatewayNetmask  Interface
>
>  169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0   255.255.0.0 eth0
>
>  0.0.0.0 0.0.0.00.0.0.0 eth0
>
>  fe80::  ::64eth0
>
>  ...snip...
>
> When it was functional:
>
>
>
>  Destination Gateway  Netmask Interface
>
>  192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0  255.255.255.0   eth0
>
>  169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0  255.255.0.0 eth0
>
>  0.0.0.0   192.168.0.1   0.0.0.0 eth0
>
>  fe80::   ::64eth0
>
>  ...snip...
>
>
> The spontaneous fixes since the first occurrence leads me to consider
> the possibility that Evan's edit of /etc/network/interfaces did not
> fix the issue, but only served to break the NetworkManager applet.
>
> I am interested in having a bag of diagnostic tricks at the ready when
> it happens again.  High on my list of suspects is the DSL modem.  I am
> also interested in restoring the NetworkManager applet to function.
>
> Suggestions?
>
> -Denis
> ___
> PLUG mailing list
> PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
> http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
>

Denis,
What kind of DSL modem is it, who's your ISP?
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


[PLUG] Network failure

2009-11-14 Thread Denis Heidtmann
Trying to understand what happened to my network on Sep 21, 2009, and
actions to take if it happens again.

Background: Running Ubuntu 9.04 with NetworkManager
(http://projects.gnome.org/NetworkManager/)
DSL modem.  No wireless.

On 9/21/09 all network communication failed.  I power cycled the modem
to no effect.  My son changed /etc/network/interfaces from:
auto lo

iface lo inet loopback


to:
auto lo

iface lo inet loopback



auto eth0

iface eth0 inet dhcp


After restarting the network was restored, but the NetworkManager
applet which displays the network status on the task bar shows the
network as not functional.

Since this occurrence I have had two more times that the network
failed.  In both cases after shutting down for an hour or so then
restarting the network came back up functional.  During one of these
most recent failures, I looked at a GUI which displays, among other
things, Netstat outputs.

 When it had failed:



  Destination GatewayNetmask  Interface

  169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0   255.255.0.0 eth0

  0.0.0.0 0.0.0.00.0.0.0 eth0

  fe80::  ::64eth0

  ...snip...

When it was functional:



  Destination Gateway  Netmask Interface

  192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0  255.255.255.0   eth0

  169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0  255.255.0.0 eth0

  0.0.0.0   192.168.0.1   0.0.0.0 eth0

  fe80::   ::64eth0

  ...snip...


The spontaneous fixes since the first occurrence leads me to consider
the possibility that Evan's edit of /etc/network/interfaces did not
fix the issue, but only served to break the NetworkManager applet.

I am interested in having a bag of diagnostic tricks at the ready when
it happens again.  High on my list of suspects is the DSL modem.  I am
also interested in restoring the NetworkManager applet to function.

Suggestions?

-Denis
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Dell Zino

2009-11-14 Thread Tom Sharples
Along the same line, we need to prototype something that's capable of 
playing streaming video from up to four IP cameras in a Firefox browser 
window, using the downloadable java players that each cam manufacturer 
provides to support playback of mjpeg or mpeg4 video streams. In the example 
of your proposed hardware, would these players typically be able to use the 
Nvidia chipset or would they have to use the Atom processor, or is there any 
way to know without trying it?

Thanks,

Tom S.

- Original Message - 
From: "Galen Seitz" 
To: "General Linux/UNIX discussion and help;civil and on-topic" 

Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 9:37 PM
Subject: Re: [PLUG] Dell Zino


> VY wrote:
>> Hi:
>>
>> Does anyone has any experience running Linux on the new Dell Zino line of
>> PCs?
>> I want to use it as a media center kind of box.  It seems low
>> cost and even has an HDMI out.
>>
>> http://www.dell.com/us/en/home/desktops/inspiron-zino-hd/pd.aspx?refid=inspiron-zino-hd&s=dhs&cs=19&ref=dthp
>
> My first concern would be the state of driver support for video
> features.  It seems to be taking forever for ATI and Intel to get this
> stuff nailed down.
>
> I'm considering a motherboard with an Nvidia ION chipset for a MythTV
> front end client.
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=nvidia_ion_linux&num=1
>
> These boards use an Atom processor, but with all the heavy lifting
> offloaded to the Nvidia graphics processor, they have no problem
> handling HD video.  The one downfall that is frequently mentioned is
> flash.  Since there currently is no way to offload flash video to the
> graphics processor, the Atom has to do the rendering.  As you can
> imagine, this does not work very well for anything high-res.
>
> Both Zotac and Asrock make suitable ION motherboards.  Here's one that
> looks promising for my purposes:
> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813500027&cm_re=zotac_ion-_-13-500-027-_-Product
>
> I can't believe I'm suggesting something that requires a proprietary
> driver, but unfortunately the Nvidia ION is currently the best fit for
> what I want to do.
>
> -- 
> Galen Seitz
> gal...@seitzassoc.com
> ___
> PLUG mailing list
> PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
> http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug






No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.425 / Virus Database: 270.14.64/2501 - Release Date: 11/13/09 
18:22:00

___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug