Re: [pmwiki-users] Page save performance issue
Hello Jean-Daniel, thank you for your reply! Oh yes, not only defragmented. I have re-formatted that data partitions for the web server and placed the htdocs including the PmWiki directory in the fresh-formatted partition - with no performance improvement. Actually I have no idea where to increase the page-save-performance. But I also want to have a look to my Apache 2.2. I have the apprehension that here something's not ok. I will inform community if I find out something. Have a nice day and best regards, yours Erek jdd-gmane wrote: Laatz, Erek a écrit : On both systems the page save performance is nearly the same. did you defragment the hard drive? jdd -- +---++ I Erek LaatzII I Senior Consultant I Tel.: +49.(0)431.3993-556 I I Professionals Projects I FAX: +49.(0)431.3993-999 I I --II I Consist Software Solutions GmbH II I A Consist World Group Company I Mobile: +49.(0)160.90627851 I I Falklandstr. 1-3, 24159 Kiel I E-Mail: la...@consist.de I I Postfach 93 28, 24152 Kiel II +---++ I HRB Kiel Nr. 3983, UST-ID: DE811697637 I I Geschäftsführer: Dipl.-Kfm. Daniel RiesI I Dipl.-Math. Martin Lochte-Holtgreven I I Ines von Jagemann I ++ I Pushing IT forward!I I Ihr IT-Spezialist für Integrations- und Individuallösungen I I Your IT specialist for integration and tailor-made solutions I ++ Finalist beim Großen Preis des Mittelstandes !-- Nichts auf der Welt ist so mächtig wie eine Idee, deren Zeit gekommen ist! Victor Hugo ! ___ pmwiki-users mailing list pmwiki-users@pmichaud.com http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
Re: [pmwiki-users] Page save performance issue
Laatz, Erek wrote: Here some basic informations about the Wiki and the systems: Wiki: 348 sites / 353 files in ./wiki.d What do you mean here by sites here? Do you have 348 farms? And each farm has 353 files in wiki.d? ___ pmwiki-users mailing list pmwiki-users@pmichaud.com http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
[pmwiki-users] Getting a random page name inside a cookbook recipe
Within a cookbook recipe I want to select a page at random from a
particular group. The solution I came up with is:
$pagename = trim(strip_tags(MarkupToHTML('', '(:pagelist fmt=#simple
list=normal group=Sprites order=random count=1:)')));
This has the advantage of not needing any dedicated pagelist format.
However, I'm a little worried that it's doing more than is necessary.
Is there a nicer way?
Maxim
___
pmwiki-users mailing list
pmwiki-users@pmichaud.com
http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
[pmwiki-users] Just starting out....
Hello all, I have a dumb newbie question - I have installed pmwiki, everything seems to be fine. However, any changes I make to local/config.php do not show up when I load pmwiki.php in my browser. latest change was to install a skin and reference it in config.php - again no show. My logo - no show. My background color change - no show. What stupid thing am I doing wrong :-| Thanks so much, ___ pmwiki-users mailing list pmwiki-users@pmichaud.com http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
Re: [pmwiki-users] Just starting out....
~Jami wrote: Hello all, I have a dumb newbie question - I have installed pmwiki, everything seems to be fine. However, any changes I make to local/config.php do not show up when I load pmwiki.php in my browser. latest change was to install a skin and reference it in config.php - again no show. My logo - no show. My background color change - no show. Make sure there are execute privs on config.php (I have 0644), and on the local/ directory (I have 0755). You might also quickly check that config.php is being executed. Add a basic print statement: echo In config; If you see In config when you reload your browser (and possibly some errors, just ignore those), then you may have an error how you're including the skin. If so let us know what statements you're using. If you don't see the In config then check that you have the installations setup right, with the directories in the right place. ~ ~ Dave ___ pmwiki-users mailing list pmwiki-users@pmichaud.com http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
Re: [pmwiki-users] Page save performance issue
Forward response to list. Laatz, Erek wrote: Hi Dave, sorry for my bad description: 2 independent hosts (where one is backup) with same content. Both will have 353 files in wiki.d directory. DaveG schrieb: Laatz, Erek wrote: Here some basic informations about the Wiki and the systems: Wiki: 348 sites / 353 files in ./wiki.d What do you mean here by sites here? Do you have 348 farms? And each farm has 353 files in wiki.d? No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.686 / Virus Database: 270.14.23/2448 - Release Date: 10/20/09 06:43:00 ___ pmwiki-users mailing list pmwiki-users@pmichaud.com http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
Re: [pmwiki-users] Just starting out....
Thank you Dave. I did change permissions and found a caching problem. It's fixed now DaveG wrote: ~Jami wrote: Hello all, I have a dumb newbie question - I have installed pmwiki, everything seems to be fine. However, any changes I make to local/config.php do not show up when I load pmwiki.php in my browser. latest change was to install a skin and reference it in config.php - again no show. My logo - no show. My background color change - no show. Make sure there are execute privs on config.php (I have 0644), and on the local/ directory (I have 0755). You might also quickly check that config.php is being executed. Add a basic print statement: echo "In config"; If you see "In config" when you reload your browser (and possibly some errors, just ignore those), then you may have an error how you're including the skin. If so let us know what statements you're using. If you don't see the "In config" then check that you have the installations setup right, with the directories in the right place. ~ ~ Dave ___ pmwiki-users mailing list pmwiki-users@pmichaud.com http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
[pmwiki-users] Cookbook/Flash - splitting the page into two?
hi there i'm about to upload a major update to the swf-sites.php recipe hosted at http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/Cookbook/Flash, plus i plan to majorly overhaul the page, as it's cluttered with comments, and it's can be confusing to navigate. before i do so, i would like to ask if there are any objections to splitting this page into two? Perhaps: - Cookbook/Flash - to host swf.php and flash.php - and something like Cookbook/FlashVideos (any better ideas?) - to host the recipes for youtube, vimeo, and the variety of other plugins that have been added, either in swf-sites.php or individually. what do you think? otherwise, i'll just clean up the page and try to make it as navigable as possible, perhaps a table-of-contents, some anchors, etc. also - it appears that swf.php has been overwritten with flash.php. does anybody have a copy of swf.php that could be re-uploaded? i looked in my cookbook and it's merely a duplicate... thanks, adam ___ pmwiki-users mailing list pmwiki-users@pmichaud.com http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
Re: [pmwiki-users] Cookbook/Flash - splitting the page into two?
adam overton wrote: hi there i'm about to upload a major update to the swf-sites.php recipe hosted at http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/Cookbook/Flash, plus i plan to majorly overhaul the page, as it's cluttered with comments, and it's can be confusing to navigate. Just a little :) before i do so, i would like to ask if there are any objections to splitting this page into two? Perhaps: - Cookbook/Flash - to host swf.php and flash.php - and something like Cookbook/FlashVideos (any better ideas?) - to host the recipes for youtube, vimeo, and the variety of other plugins that have been added, either in swf-sites.php or individually. Did you find a reason why they inherently need to be different plugins even? I remember when I looked at this, I wondered why we even had so many scripts. I didn't delve into it deeply, but I wonder why we don't simply have a single plugin for flash content. They all output the same basic html. The only difference might be the way a url is parsed based on domain name if a particular service requires a unique url format or params. ~ ~ Dave ___ pmwiki-users mailing list pmwiki-users@pmichaud.com http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
Re: [pmwiki-users] Cookbook/Flash - splitting the page into two?
hi dave i haven't personally worked with the flash.php or swf.php code, so i'm not sure how easy or hard it would be to integrate that with the videosharing sites code. and i'm not sure if i'm the guy to delve any deeper than i have (at thie point at least). for now i just have a big update to the 2nd portion (youtube,vimeo,etc), which has a slightly different function for each vendor due to the slight differences in the parameters they each offer, and how they apply them. there may be a way to consolidate these at some point, but i'm not there yet. as folks will see, i've complicated jon haupt's original solution now that parameters and ROEPatterns are involved. I didn't delve into it deeply, but I wonder why we don't simply have a single plugin for flash content. it seems so far the separate plugins serve two different functions based on their source rather than their output: a. flash.php swf.php are primarily used for embedding your own flash content (likely stored on your own server) b. swf-sites.php ( and the other packages) are embedding from external videosharing sites, all of which seem to have slightly different api-formats and embed code. i think combining the recipes at this point would create a mega-recipe that might be more hefty than someone might like if they only want to enable a. without enabling b., or vice versa one consolidation that could happen would be to add all the extra sprawling recipes (teachertube, audioo, godtube, slidehare) to the youtube/vimeo/googlevideo/flickr recipe, adding new players as they come along. one argument against that would be to keep the more obscure players away from the more common ones. (is that mean?) but maybe you're right - maybe there's a way to combine them more simply. for now, however my question remains - shall i split'em up, or shall all the recipes gather and be merry at the flash-party on the same page : ) a adam overton wrote: hi there i'm about to upload a major update to the swf-sites.php recipe hosted at http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/Cookbook/Flash, plus i plan to majorly overhaul the page, as it's cluttered with comments, and it's can be confusing to navigate. Just a little :) before i do so, i would like to ask if there are any objections to splitting this page into two? Perhaps: - Cookbook/Flash - to host swf.php and flash.php - and something like Cookbook/FlashVideos (any better ideas?) - to host the recipes for youtube, vimeo, and the variety of other plugins that have been added, either in swf-sites.php or individually. Did you find a reason why they inherently need to be different plugins even? I remember when I looked at this, I wondered why we even had so many scripts. I didn't delve into it deeply, but I wonder why we don't simply have a single plugin for flash content. They all output the same basic html. The only difference might be the way a url is parsed based on domain name if a particular service requires a unique url format or params. ~ ~ Dave ___ pmwiki-users mailing list pmwiki-users@pmichaud.com http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
Re: [pmwiki-users] Cookbook/Flash - splitting the page into two?
adam overton wrote: one consolidation that could happen would be to add all the extra sprawling recipes (teachertube, audioo, godtube, slidehare) to the youtube/vimeo/googlevideo/flickr recipe, adding new players as they come along. one argument against that would be to keep the more obscure players away from the more common ones. (is that mean?) I'll take a look at this then once you post your changes. but maybe you're right - maybe there's a way to combine them more simply. for now, however my question remains - shall i split'em up, or shall all the recipes gather and be merry at the flash-party on the same page : ) I reckon if we remove the comments and other cruft from the page, having one page should be okay. ~ ~ Dave ___ pmwiki-users mailing list pmwiki-users@pmichaud.com http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
Re: [pmwiki-users] Cookbook/Flash - splitting the page into two?
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 14:16 -0700, adam overton wrote: hi there i'm about to upload a major update to the swf-sites.php recipe hosted at http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/Cookbook/Flash, plus i plan to majorly overhaul the page, as it's cluttered with comments, and it's can be confusing to navigate. before i do so, i would like to ask if there are any objections to splitting this page into two? Perhaps: - Cookbook/Flash - to host swf.php and flash.php - and something like Cookbook/FlashVideos (any better ideas?) - to host the recipes for youtube, vimeo, and the variety of other plugins that have been added, either in swf-sites.php or individually. what do you think? IMHO, it's a wiki. Go for it. If somebody doesn't like it, they'll change it back... ___ pmwiki-users mailing list pmwiki-users@pmichaud.com http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
Re: [pmwiki-users] Cookbook/Flash - splitting the page into two?
so, i went ahead and added everything to Cookbook/Flash. holler if it looks like it be broken up into 2 separate pages. i guess i'll take this opportunity to announce that i've updated the swf-sites recipe located at http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/Cookbook/Flash the main changes are: * YouTube, Vimeo, GoogleVideo, and FlickrVid markup all now permit the entry of parameters, ex: (:youtube scale=1.5 playlist=1 autoplay=1:) * These four recipes now also have their own $ROEPattern so that pasting the embed code directly into the edit window will result in its conversion to clean pmwiki markup * various defaults can now be setup in config.php for more on this and other more minor changes, visit the recipe page. feedback, bug reports, etc are more than welcome. best, adam adam overton wrote: one consolidation that could happen would be to add all the extra sprawling recipes (teachertube, audioo, godtube, slidehare) to the youtube/vimeo/googlevideo/flickr recipe, adding new players as they come along. one argument against that would be to keep the more obscure players away from the more common ones. (is that mean?) I'll take a look at this then once you post your changes. but maybe you're right - maybe there's a way to combine them more simply. for now, however my question remains - shall i split'em up, or shall all the recipes gather and be merry at the flash-party on the same page : ) I reckon if we remove the comments and other cruft from the page, having one page should be okay. ~ ~ Dave ___ pmwiki-users mailing list pmwiki-users@pmichaud.com http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
