Re: Have you donated to hel Haiti?

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Thanks Fritz, that was a snap!



On Jan 14, 6:03 pm, Fritz da Cat  wrote:
> www.redcross.org
>
> Text Haiti to 90999.
>
> The Red Cross will bill your cell phone for a $10 donation.
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Obama

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Opinion noted, but not shared.

Happy New Year to you as well.



On Dec 31 2009, 11:27 pm, Hollywood  wrote:
> Mrs. Rabbit,
>
> Ah, yet another characteristic of the conservative, over-emotionalism
> and lack of self control.
> Happy New years all the same.
>
> On Dec 31, 8:14 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
>
>
> > I just can't help myself...
>
> > One
> > Big
> > Ass
> > Mistake
> > America
>
> > On Dec 31, 5:08 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
> > > O-ne
> > > B-ad
> > > A-ss
> > > M-istake
> > > A-merica- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Obama

[Mrs. Rabbit]

{{{Turtle}}}  Hey buddy!  I've been doing pretty good, busy as heck
with the family unit and work.  With all the new technology, I am
hoping to see the Rosie Robot from the Jetson's soon! ;)

How's the Turtle family?

Oh and 71be afraid, be very afraidthat is one crazy rabbit
hole.  :D



On Dec 31 2009, 9:30 pm, El Tortuga  wrote:
> Mrs wabbit, how you doing
>
> I saw the Mr Hopping around 71 in the midst of a bez meltdown
>
> On Dec 31, 9:14 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
>
>
> > I just can't help myself...
>
> > One
> > Big
> > Ass
> > Mistake
> > America
>
> > On Dec 31, 5:08 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
> > > O-ne
> > > B-ad
> > > A-ss
> > > M-istake
> > > A-merica- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Obama

[Mrs. Rabbit]

I just can't help myself...

One
Big
Ass
Mistake
America



On Dec 31, 5:08 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
> O-ne
> B-ad
> A-ss
> M-istake
> A-merica

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: 10 Awesome Deep Fried Foods

[Mrs. Rabbit]

YUM YUM!  The deep fried snicker bars are beast!  Having deep fried
oreos tonight, just one though.

Gotta save room for the wine!



On Dec 31, 3:37 pm, Travis  wrote:
> http://cavemancircus.com/2009/11/07/10-awesomely-deep-fried-foods/

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Obama

[Mrs. Rabbit]

O-ne
B-ad
A-ss
M-istake
A-merica

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Abortion is Legalized Homicide and should be repealed from our laws based on the Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004

[Mrs. Rabbit]

:o)



On Dec 29, 10:05 am, "M. Johnson"  wrote:
> Dave
>     Pro-Choicer's refuse to answer this question.
>     1. ALL Humans were once a fertilized Human egg.
>     2. Someone kills that fertilized Human egg and that Human dies.
>     Which one do you disagree with?
>
> MJ
> Bob pulls a gun and shoots Pete with whom he has never met.
> Bob has violated Pete's right to life.  Bob has unrighteously killed Pete.
>
> Bob steals Pete's house, food and belongings ... before Bob
> can leave Pete's property ... Pete shoots Bob dead.
> Pete defended his right to life.  Pete has righteously killed Bob.
>
> By the circle of your false dilemma ... Bob was once a fertilized
> egg and may therefore violate Pete's rights with impunity.
>
> Anyone that kills a fertilized Human egg that is NOT the Woman
> whose rights the fertilized egg is violating OR some Party She
> contracts with to assist in defending her life from said violation ...
> *might* (depending upon the circumstances/situation) be
> unrighteously killing that potential Human.
>
> Regard$,
> --MJ
>
> No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights
> of another, and this is all from which the laws ought to restrain
> him.  -- Thomas Jefferson to Francis Gilmer, 1816.

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Abortion is Legalized Homicide and should be repealed from our laws based on the Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004

[Mrs. Rabbit]

I try not to think too hardit will cloud ones judgement.  ;)

Where did you get your numbers?  Are they a TRUE account??  Or is it
ok just to random pull numbers out of the air for convenience?

It matters not to me, but at least be true to yourself!



On Dec 29, 10:24 am, Sage2  wrote:
>             Rabbit,
>
>                  Killing on average 1,000,000 babies per year in the
> U.S. and only 3% to 5% for emergency life threatening procedures or
> rape ; the rest is broad unjustified murder for convenience. That is a
> heavy handed  brush!
> Don't you think Rabbit ?
>
> ***­***­******
>
> On Dec 29, 10:14 am, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
>
>
> > No Sage, there are no corners in my lil white padded room.  :o)
>
> > "murdering for the sake of convenience as 95% to
>
> > > 98% of abortionist women do"  <---broad brush painting at best. ;)
>
> > On Dec 28, 10:29 pm, Sage2  wrote:
>
> > >           Mrs. Rabbit,
>
> > >               If you will read the thread completely you will see that
> > > I have said as much, so it seems you have painted yourself in a corner
> > > with that brush of which you speak. Not I !    " You siwwy wabbit you
> > > " !
>
> > > ***­­­
>
> > > On Dec 28, 9:54 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
> > > > Hum...paint with such a broad brush much?   Not all women who abort do
> > > > it out of selfish convenience geeze...
>
> > > > What about the woman who was raped?  Shouldn't she have the right to
> > > > NOT be a parent against her will?  Talk about force...
>
> > > > On Dec 28, 8:57 pm, Sage2  wrote:
>
> > > > >             Mark,
>
> > > > >         Half right (in a good moral decision where it is a medical
> > > > > NECESSITY) is far from murdering for the sake of convenience as 95% to
> > > > > 98% of abortionist women do.
> > > > > NO!  That is  completely & unequivocally wrong !   It is not a matter
> > > > > of simple " value"  but moral human values to which abortionist women
> > > > > do not adhere to for the sake of  selfish  c o n v e n i e n c e .
> > > > > They  ( abortionist women ) not being cognizant or spirited enough to
> > > > > realize their own mothers allowed THEM to be.
>
> > > > > " To be or not to be ? That is the question ! "
>
> > > > > ***­
>
> > > > > On Dec 28, 7:40 pm, Mark  wrote:
>
> > > > > > so now we add "value" to the mix. You now say the mother is worth 
> > > > > > more
> > > > > > than the possible baby
>
> > > > > > now you have left the realm of ego and are adding the universe of
> > > > > > hypocrisy to your claim. We as humans either do or do not have the
> > > > > > right to leave God (whichever), country (wherever) and our neighbors
> > > > > > opinions as to what is acceptable out of the equation or we do 
> > > > > > not
> > > > > > there are no "half" rights.
>
> > > > > > On 12/28/09, Sage2  wrote:
>
> > > > > > >              Mark,
>
> > > > > > >             Giving the mother a choice for life threatening 
> > > > > > > medical
> > > > > > > reasons or violent rape is one thing but "free choice" for the 
> > > > > > > purpose
> > > > > > > of convenience is another. Most women take advantage of the 
> > > > > > > latter and
> > > > > > > that  sir is beyond egotistical; it is outright shameless / 
> > > > > > > selfish
> > > > > > > murder. The colaborators have simply made it convenient for them, 
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > which; they take full ( gross & morbid )  ADVANTAGE of said 
> > > > > > > murders.
> > > > > > > END
>
> > > > > > > ***­­**
>
> > > > > > > O

Re: Abortion is Legalized Homicide and should be repealed from our laws based on the Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004

[Mrs. Rabbit]

So, now we are talking about when life begins?  Maybe you should start
another thread on that topic alone?  I'm just saying...



ALL Humans were once a fertilized Human eggYES, I agree...but not
all fertilized eggs become a born human  being.

Someone kills that fertilized Human egg and that Human dies...YES, I
agreeif only the fertilized egg has become a Human fetus first.

Check this out:
http://www.advancedfertility.com/blastocystimages.htm




On Dec 28, 10:38 pm, Dave  wrote:
> Pro-Choicer's refuse to answer this question.
>
> 1. ALL Humans were once a fertilized Human egg.
> 2. Someone kills that fertilized Human egg and that Human dies.
>
> Which one do you disagree with?

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Abortion is Legalized Homicide and should be repealed from our laws based on the Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004

[Mrs. Rabbit]

No Sage, there are no corners in my lil white padded room.  :o)

"murdering for the sake of convenience as 95% to
> 98% of abortionist women do"  <---broad brush painting at best. ;)





On Dec 28, 10:29 pm, Sage2  wrote:
>           Mrs. Rabbit,
>
>               If you will read the thread completely you will see that
> I have said as much, so it seems you have painted yourself in a corner
> with that brush of which you speak. Not I !    " You siwwy wabbit you
> " !
>
> ***­********
>
> On Dec 28, 9:54 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hum...paint with such a broad brush much?   Not all women who abort do
> > it out of selfish convenience geeze...
>
> > What about the woman who was raped?  Shouldn't she have the right to
> > NOT be a parent against her will?  Talk about force...
>
> > On Dec 28, 8:57 pm, Sage2  wrote:
>
> > >             Mark,
>
> > >         Half right (in a good moral decision where it is a medical
> > > NECESSITY) is far from murdering for the sake of convenience as 95% to
> > > 98% of abortionist women do.
> > > NO!  That is  completely & unequivocally wrong !   It is not a matter
> > > of simple " value"  but moral human values to which abortionist women
> > > do not adhere to for the sake of  selfish  c o n v e n i e n c e .
> > > They  ( abortionist women ) not being cognizant or spirited enough to
> > > realize their own mothers allowed THEM to be.
>
> > > " To be or not to be ? That is the question ! "
>
> > > ***­­­
>
> > > On Dec 28, 7:40 pm, Mark  wrote:
>
> > > > so now we add "value" to the mix. You now say the mother is worth more
> > > > than the possible baby
>
> > > > now you have left the realm of ego and are adding the universe of
> > > > hypocrisy to your claim. We as humans either do or do not have the
> > > > right to leave God (whichever), country (wherever) and our neighbors
> > > > opinions as to what is acceptable out of the equation or we do not
> > > > there are no "half" rights.
>
> > > > On 12/28/09, Sage2  wrote:
>
> > > > >              Mark,
>
> > > > >             Giving the mother a choice for life threatening medical
> > > > > reasons or violent rape is one thing but "free choice" for the purpose
> > > > > of convenience is another. Most women take advantage of the latter and
> > > > > that  sir is beyond egotistical; it is outright shameless / selfish
> > > > > murder. The colaborators have simply made it convenient for them, to
> > > > > which; they take full ( gross & morbid )  ADVANTAGE of said murders.
> > > > > END
>
> > > > > *****
>
> > > > > On Dec 28, 5:13 pm, Mark  wrote:
> > > > >> so, once again you claim to be PRO abortion but under your rules ONLY
> > > > >>  How egotistical !!
>
> > > > >> On 12/28/09, Sage2  wrote:
>
> > > > >> >           Mark,
>
> > > > >> >            When a heart stops beating one dies. Abortion stops a
> > > > >> > beating heart !  Unlike a natural death abortion is not a natural
> > > > >> > death but unatural and an act of the decider of that death. No one 
> > > > >> > has
> > > > >> > that right, not even an abortionist mother unless it is deemed
> > > > >> > necessary for medical life threatening reasons or rape. END !
>
> > > > >> > ***­*
>
> > > > >> > On Dec 28, 2:16 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE  wrote:
> > > > >> >> """""""UNLESS the mother will die otherwise.""""""
>
> > > > >> >> So you DO favor abortion just as long as YOU get to dictate the
> > > > >> >> reasons.
>
> > > > >> >> On Dec 28, 12:04 pm, Dave  wrote:
>
> > > > >> >> > UNLESS the mother will die otherwise.
>
> > > > >> >> 

Re: Have you noticed...

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Now, now, now.this could apply to the far left also Studio,
especially when Bush was prez.

Anywho, Happy Holidays!  Finally got that new vehicle, just not the
flying machine I want!



On Dec 29, 8:12 am, studio  wrote:
> ...that while everyone else is celebrating the holidays relaxing and
> enjoying, the board has become almost entirely populated by the angry
> conservative far-right neo-cons that have been bitchin', moanin' and
> cryin' the whole time?
> They can't even take one day off unless they can find a feast to
> complain about.
> What spoiled brats.

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Abortion is Legalized Homicide and should be repealed from our laws based on the Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004

[Mrs. Rabbit]

It's nice to finally have some time to post and not just a *drive by*!



On Dec 28, 9:40 pm, Mark  wrote:
> Mrs. R !!
>
> so good to have you step in  I bow to the logic of your post.
>
> On 12/28/09, Mrs. Rabbit  wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Guys,
>
> > Abortion doesn't have to be an option.  Education on prevention and
> > the use of the morning after pill would help eliminate the need for
> > abortions, IMO.
>
> >http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/morning-after-pill/AN00592
>
> > On Dec 28, 1:04 pm, Dave  wrote:
> >> UNLESS the mother will die otherwise.
>
> >> There is already a law on the books to protect unborn babies from
> >> violence.
> >> This should be extended to cover Abortions.
>
> >> Public Law 108-212
> >> UNBORN VICTIMS OF VIOLENCE ACT OF
> >> 2004http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=108_cong_pu...
>
> >> H.R.1997 - To amend title 18, United States Code, and the Uniform Code
> >> of Military Justice to protect unborn children from assault and
> >> murder, and for other purposes.
> >> House of Representatives -
> >> February 26, 2004 1:55 PM
> >>              Yeas Nays  Pres   NoVote
> >> Republican  207  13              7
> >> Democrat     47 149              9
> >> Independent       1
> >> TOTAL          254 163
> >>  16http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2004/roll031.xml
>
> >> Senate -
> >> March 25, 2004 05:39 PM
> >>              Yeas Nays  Pres   NoVote
> >> Republican   48   2              1
> >> Democrat     13  35
> >> Independent       1
> >> TOTAL           61  38
> >> 1http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_...
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> --
> Mark M. Kahle,  ,www.filacoffee.com- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Abortion is Legalized Homicide and should be repealed from our laws based on the Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Hum...paint with such a broad brush much?   Not all women who abort do
it out of selfish convenience geeze...

What about the woman who was raped?  Shouldn't she have the right to
NOT be a parent against her will?  Talk about force...



On Dec 28, 8:57 pm, Sage2  wrote:
>             Mark,
>
>         Half right (in a good moral decision where it is a medical
> NECESSITY) is far from murdering for the sake of convenience as 95% to
> 98% of abortionist women do.
> NO!  That is  completely & unequivocally wrong !   It is not a matter
> of simple " value"  but moral human values to which abortionist women
> do not adhere to for the sake of  selfish  c o n v e n i e n c e .
> They  ( abortionist women ) not being cognizant or spirited enough to
> realize their own mothers allowed THEM to be.
>
> " To be or not to be ? That is the question ! "
>
> ***­
>
> On Dec 28, 7:40 pm, Mark  wrote:
>
>
>
> > so now we add "value" to the mix. You now say the mother is worth more
> > than the possible baby
>
> > now you have left the realm of ego and are adding the universe of
> > hypocrisy to your claim. We as humans either do or do not have the
> > right to leave God (whichever), country (wherever) and our neighbors
> > opinions as to what is acceptable out of the equation or we do not
> > there are no "half" rights.
>
> > On 12/28/09, Sage2  wrote:
>
> > >              Mark,
>
> > >             Giving the mother a choice for life threatening medical
> > > reasons or violent rape is one thing but "free choice" for the purpose
> > > of convenience is another. Most women take advantage of the latter and
> > > that  sir is beyond egotistical; it is outright shameless / selfish
> > > murder. The colaborators have simply made it convenient for them, to
> > > which; they take full ( gross & morbid )  ADVANTAGE of said murders.
> > > END
>
> > > ***­­**
>
> > > On Dec 28, 5:13 pm, Mark  wrote:
> > >> so, once again you claim to be PRO abortion but under your rules ONLY
> > >>  How egotistical !!
>
> > >> On 12/28/09, Sage2  wrote:
>
> > >> >           Mark,
>
> > >> >            When a heart stops beating one dies. Abortion stops a
> > >> > beating heart !  Unlike a natural death abortion is not a natural
> > >> > death but unatural and an act of the decider of that death. No one has
> > >> > that right, not even an abortionist mother unless it is deemed
> > >> > necessary for medical life threatening reasons or rape. END !
>
> > >> > ***­­­*
>
> > >> > On Dec 28, 2:16 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE  wrote:
> > >> >> """UNLESS the mother will die otherwise.""
>
> > >> >> So you DO favor abortion just as long as YOU get to dictate the
> > >> >> reasons.
>
> > >> >> On Dec 28, 12:04 pm, Dave  wrote:
>
> > >> >> > UNLESS the mother will die otherwise.
>
> > >> >> > There is already a law on the books to protect unborn babies from
> > >> >> > violence.
> > >> >> > This should be extended to cover Abortions.
>
> > >> >> > Public Law 108-212
> > >> >> > UNBORN VICTIMS OF VIOLENCE ACT OF
> > >> >> > 2004http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=108_cong_pu...
>
> > >> >> > H.R.1997 - To amend title 18, United States Code, and the Uniform
> > >> >> > Code
> > >> >> > of Military Justice to protect unborn children from assault and
> > >> >> > murder, and for other purposes.
> > >> >> > House of Representatives -
> > >> >> > February 26, 2004 1:55 PM
> > >> >> >              Yeas Nays  Pres   NoVote
> > >> >> > Republican  207  13              7
> > >> >> > Democrat     47 149              9
> > >> >> > Independent       1
> > >> >> > TOTAL          254 163
> > >> >> >  16http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2004/roll031.xml
>
> > >> >> > Senate -
> > >> >> > March 25, 2004 05:39 PM
> > >> >> >              Yeas Nays  Pres   NoVote
> > >> >> > Republican   48   2              1
> > >> >> > Democrat     13  35
> > >> >> > Independent       1
> > >> >> > TOTAL           61  38
> > >> >> > 1http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_...
> > >> >> > Hide quoted text -
>
> > >> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > >> > --
> > >> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > >> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > >> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > >> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > >> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > >> --
> > >> Mark M. Kahle,  ,www.filacoffee.com-Hidequoted text -
>
> > >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > > --
> > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > > * Visit our other community ath

Re: Abortion is Legalized Homicide and should be repealed from our laws based on the Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Guys,

Abortion doesn't have to be an option.  Education on prevention and
the use of the morning after pill would help eliminate the need for
abortions, IMO.


http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/morning-after-pill/AN00592





On Dec 28, 1:04 pm, Dave  wrote:
> UNLESS the mother will die otherwise.
>
> There is already a law on the books to protect unborn babies from
> violence.
> This should be extended to cover Abortions.
>
> Public Law 108-212
> UNBORN VICTIMS OF VIOLENCE ACT OF 
> 2004http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=108_cong_pu...
>
> H.R.1997 - To amend title 18, United States Code, and the Uniform Code
> of Military Justice to protect unborn children from assault and
> murder, and for other purposes.
> House of Representatives -
> February 26, 2004 1:55 PM
>              Yeas Nays  Pres   NoVote
> Republican  207  13              7
> Democrat     47 149              9
> Independent       1
> TOTAL          254 163            
> 16http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2004/roll031.xml
>
> Senate -
> March 25, 2004 05:39 PM
>              Yeas Nays  Pres   NoVote
> Republican   48   2              1
> Democrat     13  35
> Independent       1
> TOTAL           61  38             
> 1http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_...

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Urgent!

[Mrs. Rabbit]

You are such a big animal lover, aren't you?  :D



On Dec 24, 9:00 am, NavyBrat  wrote:
> As Turtle would say "droll" .-)
>
> On Dec 23, 9:05 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
>
>
> > Christmas Restructure
> > Urgent: Famous Reindeer Terminated
> > The recent announcement that Donner and Blitzen have elected to take
> > the early reindeer retirement package has triggered a good deal of
> > concern about whether they will be replaced, and about other
> > restructuring decisions at the North Pole.
>
> > Streamlining is due to the North Pole's loss of dominance of the
> > season's gift distribution business. Home shopping channels and mail
> > order catalogues have diminished Santa's market share. He could not
> > sit idly by and permit further erosion of the profit picture.
>
> > The reindeer downsizing was made possible through the purchase of a
> > late model Japanese sled for the CEO's annual trip. Improved
> > productivity from Dasher and Dancer, who summered at the Harvard
> > Business School, is anticipated. Reduction in reindeer will also
> > lessen airborne environmental emissions for which the North Pole has
> > received unfavorable press.
>
> > I am pleased to inform you that Rudolph's role will not be disturbed.
> > Tradition still counts for something at the North Pole. Management
> > denies, in the strongest possible language, the earlier leak that
> > Rudolph's nose got that way, not from the cold, substance abuse.
> > Calling Rudolph "a lush who was into the sauce and never did pull his
> > share of the load" was an unfortunate context at a time of year when
> > he is known to be under executive stress.
>
> > As a further restructuring, today's global challenges require the
> > North Pole to continue to look for better, more competitive steps.
> > Effective immediately, the following economy measures are to take
> > place in the "Twelve Days of Christmas" subsidiary:
>
> > The partridge will be retained, but the pear tree never turned out to
> > be the cash crop forecasted. It will be replaced by a plastic hanging
> > plant, providing considerable savings in maintenance;
>
> > The two turtle doves represent a redundancy that is simply not cost
> > effective. In addition, their romance during working hours could not
> > be condoned. The positions are therefore eliminated;
>
> > The three French hens will remain intact. After all, everyone loves
> > the French;
>
> > The four calling birds were replaced by an automated voice mail
> > system, with a call waiting option. An analysis is underway to
> > determine who the birds have been calling, how often and how long they
> > talked;
>
> > The five golden rings have been put on hold by the Board of Directors.
> > Maintaining a portfolio based on one commodity could have negative
> > implications for institutional investors. Diversification into other
> > precious metals as well as a mix of T-Bills and high technology stocks
> > appear to be in order;
>
> > The six geese-a-laying constitutes a luxury which can no longer be
> > afforded. It has long been felt that the production rate of one egg
> > per goose per day is an example of the decline in productivity. Three
> > geese will be let go, and an upgrading in the selection procedure by
> > personnel will assure management that from now on every goose it gets
> > will be a good one;
>
> > The seven swans-a-swimming is obviously a number chosen in better
> > times. The function is primarily decorative. Mechanical swans are on
> > order. The current swans will be retrained to learn some new strokes
> > and therefore enhance their outplacement;
>
> > As you know, the eight maids-a-milking concept has been under heavy
> > scrutiny by the EEOC. A male/female balance in the workforce is being
> > sought. The more militant maids consider this a dead-end job with no
> > upward mobility. Automation of the process may permit the maids to try
> > a-mending, a-mentoring or a-mulching;
>
> > Nine ladies dancing has always been an odd number. This function will
> > be phased out as these individuals grow older and can no longer do the
> > steps;
>
> > Ten Lords-a-leaping is overkill. The high cost of Lords plus the
> > expense of international air travel prompted the Compensation
> > Committee to suggest replacing this group with ten out-of-work
> > congressmen. While leaping ability may be somewhat sacrificed, the
> > savings are significant because we expect an oversupply of 

Urgent!

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Christmas Restructure
Urgent: Famous Reindeer Terminated
The recent announcement that Donner and Blitzen have elected to take
the early reindeer retirement package has triggered a good deal of
concern about whether they will be replaced, and about other
restructuring decisions at the North Pole.

Streamlining is due to the North Pole's loss of dominance of the
season's gift distribution business. Home shopping channels and mail
order catalogues have diminished Santa's market share. He could not
sit idly by and permit further erosion of the profit picture.

The reindeer downsizing was made possible through the purchase of a
late model Japanese sled for the CEO's annual trip. Improved
productivity from Dasher and Dancer, who summered at the Harvard
Business School, is anticipated. Reduction in reindeer will also
lessen airborne environmental emissions for which the North Pole has
received unfavorable press.

I am pleased to inform you that Rudolph's role will not be disturbed.
Tradition still counts for something at the North Pole. Management
denies, in the strongest possible language, the earlier leak that
Rudolph's nose got that way, not from the cold, substance abuse.
Calling Rudolph "a lush who was into the sauce and never did pull his
share of the load" was an unfortunate context at a time of year when
he is known to be under executive stress.

As a further restructuring, today's global challenges require the
North Pole to continue to look for better, more competitive steps.
Effective immediately, the following economy measures are to take
place in the "Twelve Days of Christmas" subsidiary:


The partridge will be retained, but the pear tree never turned out to
be the cash crop forecasted. It will be replaced by a plastic hanging
plant, providing considerable savings in maintenance;

The two turtle doves represent a redundancy that is simply not cost
effective. In addition, their romance during working hours could not
be condoned. The positions are therefore eliminated;

The three French hens will remain intact. After all, everyone loves
the French;

The four calling birds were replaced by an automated voice mail
system, with a call waiting option. An analysis is underway to
determine who the birds have been calling, how often and how long they
talked;

The five golden rings have been put on hold by the Board of Directors.
Maintaining a portfolio based on one commodity could have negative
implications for institutional investors. Diversification into other
precious metals as well as a mix of T-Bills and high technology stocks
appear to be in order;

The six geese-a-laying constitutes a luxury which can no longer be
afforded. It has long been felt that the production rate of one egg
per goose per day is an example of the decline in productivity. Three
geese will be let go, and an upgrading in the selection procedure by
personnel will assure management that from now on every goose it gets
will be a good one;

The seven swans-a-swimming is obviously a number chosen in better
times. The function is primarily decorative. Mechanical swans are on
order. The current swans will be retrained to learn some new strokes
and therefore enhance their outplacement;

As you know, the eight maids-a-milking concept has been under heavy
scrutiny by the EEOC. A male/female balance in the workforce is being
sought. The more militant maids consider this a dead-end job with no
upward mobility. Automation of the process may permit the maids to try
a-mending, a-mentoring or a-mulching;

Nine ladies dancing has always been an odd number. This function will
be phased out as these individuals grow older and can no longer do the
steps;

Ten Lords-a-leaping is overkill. The high cost of Lords plus the
expense of international air travel prompted the Compensation
Committee to suggest replacing this group with ten out-of-work
congressmen. While leaping ability may be somewhat sacrificed, the
savings are significant because we expect an oversupply of unemployed
congressmen this year;

Eleven pipers piping and twelve drummers drumming is a simple case of
the band getting too big. A substitution with a string quartet, a
cutback on new music and no uniforms will produce savings which will
drop right down to the bottom line.

We can expect a substantial reduction in assorted people, fowl,
animals and other expenses. Though incomplete, studies indicate that
stretching deliveries over twelve days is inefficient. If we can drop
ship in one day, service levels will be improved.

Regarding the lawsuit filed by the attorney's association seeking
expansion to include the legal profession ("thirteen lawyers-a-suing")
action is pending.

Lastly, it is not beyond consideration that deeper cuts may be
necessary in the future to stay competitive. should that happen, the
Board will request management to scrutinize the Snow White Division to
see if seven dwarfs is the right number.

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For optio

Re: 'Twas the Night Before Christmas, ca. 2009 (aka Grandma's Last)

[Mrs. Rabbit]

LMAO Travis!!!




On Dec 23, 10:44 pm, Travis  wrote:
> http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2009/12/twas-the-night.html

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Just popping in to.....

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Go ahead and call PETA, it won't be the first time!  ;)

Have missed talking with you!!!  I have just too much on my plate for
the boards these days, but with Christmas break here, I hope to catch
up some.

Take care!



On Dec 23, 10:50 pm, NavyBrat  wrote:
> groan! ;-)
>
> On Dec 23, 8:05 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
>
>
> > What does Santa call reindeer who refuse to work?
>
> > wait for it
>
> > wait for it
>
> > DINNER!
>
> > :D
>
> > On Dec 23, 4:26 pm, NavyBrat  wrote:
>
> > > Wish you all a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.
> > > Peace.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Politically Correct

[Mrs. Rabbit]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jEnTSQStGE&feature=related


Peace on Earthis it possible?



On Dec 23, 10:25 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
> Merry Christmas Travis!
>
> On Dec 23, 10:17 pm, Travis  wrote:
>
>
>
> > Wonderful  full speed ahead and damn the aclfu.
>
> > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Mrs. Rabbit 
> > wrote:
>
> > > Politically Correct
>
> > > 'Twas the night before Christmas and Santa's a wreck...
> > > How to live in a world that's politically correct?
> > > His workers no longer would answer to "Elves".
> > > "Vertically Challenged" they were calling themselves.
> > > And labor conditions at the north pole
> > > Were alleged by the union to stifle the soul.
> > > Four reindeer had vanished, without much propriety,
> > > Released to the wilds by the Humane Society.
> > > And equal employment had made it quite clear
> > > That Santa had better not use just reindeer.
> > > So Dancer and Donner, Comet and Cupid,
> > > Were replaced with 4 pigs, and you know that looked stupid!
>
> > > The runners had been removed from his sleigh;
> > > The ruts were termed dangerous by the E.P.A.
> > > And people had started to call for the cops
> > > When they heard sled noises on their roof-tops.
> > > Second-hand smoke from his pipe had his workers quite frightened.
> > > His fur trimmed red suit was called "Unenlightened."
>
> > > And to show you the strangeness of life's ebbs and flows,
> > > Rudolf was suing over unauthorized use of his nose
> > > And had gone on Geraldo, in front of the nation,
> > > Demanding millions in over-due compensation.
>
> > > So, half of the reindeer were gone; and his wife,
> > > Who suddenly said she'd enough of this life,
> > > Joined a self-help group, packed, and left in a whiz,
> > > Demanding from now on her title was Ms.
>
> > > And as for the gifts, why, he'd never had a notion
> > > That making a choice could cause so much commotion.
> > > Nothing of leather, nothing of fur,
> > > Which meant nothing for him. And nothing for her.
> > > Nothing that might be construed to pollute.
> > > Nothing to aim. Nothing to shoot.
> > > Nothing that clamored or made lots of noise.
> > > Nothing for just girls. Or just for the boys.
> > > Nothing that claimed to be gender specific.
> > > Nothing that's warlike or non-pacific.
>
> > > No candy or sweets...they were bad for the tooth.
> > > Nothing that seemed to embellish a truth.
> > > And fairy tales, while not yet forbidden,
> > > Were like Ken and Barbie, better off hidden.
> > > For they raised the hackles of those psychological
> > > Who claimed the only good gift was one ecological.
>
> > > No baseball, no football...someone could get hurt;
> > > Besides, playing sports exposed kids to dirt.
> > > Dolls were said to be sexist, and should be passé;
> > > And Nintendo would rot your entire brain away.
>
> > > So Santa just stood there, disheveled, perplexed;
> > > He just could not figure out what to do next.
> > > He tried to be merry, tried to be gay,
> > > But you've got to be careful with that word today.
> > > His sack was quite empty, limp to the ground;
> > > Nothing fully acceptable was to be found.
> > > Something special was needed, a gift that he might
> > > Give to all without angering the left or the right.
> > > A gift that would satisfy, with no indecision,
> > > Each group of people, every religion;
> > > Every ethnicity, every hue,
> > > Everyone, everywhere...even you.
> > > So here is that gift, it's price beyond worth...
> > > "May you and your loved ones enjoy peace on earth."
>
> > > --
> > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > > * Visit our other community 
> > > athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Politically Correct

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Merry Christmas Travis!



On Dec 23, 10:17 pm, Travis  wrote:
> Wonderful  full speed ahead and damn the aclfu.
>
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Mrs. Rabbit wrote:
>
>
>
> > Politically Correct
>
> > 'Twas the night before Christmas and Santa's a wreck...
> > How to live in a world that's politically correct?
> > His workers no longer would answer to "Elves".
> > "Vertically Challenged" they were calling themselves.
> > And labor conditions at the north pole
> > Were alleged by the union to stifle the soul.
> > Four reindeer had vanished, without much propriety,
> > Released to the wilds by the Humane Society.
> > And equal employment had made it quite clear
> > That Santa had better not use just reindeer.
> > So Dancer and Donner, Comet and Cupid,
> > Were replaced with 4 pigs, and you know that looked stupid!
>
> > The runners had been removed from his sleigh;
> > The ruts were termed dangerous by the E.P.A.
> > And people had started to call for the cops
> > When they heard sled noises on their roof-tops.
> > Second-hand smoke from his pipe had his workers quite frightened.
> > His fur trimmed red suit was called "Unenlightened."
>
> > And to show you the strangeness of life's ebbs and flows,
> > Rudolf was suing over unauthorized use of his nose
> > And had gone on Geraldo, in front of the nation,
> > Demanding millions in over-due compensation.
>
> > So, half of the reindeer were gone; and his wife,
> > Who suddenly said she'd enough of this life,
> > Joined a self-help group, packed, and left in a whiz,
> > Demanding from now on her title was Ms.
>
> > And as for the gifts, why, he'd never had a notion
> > That making a choice could cause so much commotion.
> > Nothing of leather, nothing of fur,
> > Which meant nothing for him. And nothing for her.
> > Nothing that might be construed to pollute.
> > Nothing to aim. Nothing to shoot.
> > Nothing that clamored or made lots of noise.
> > Nothing for just girls. Or just for the boys.
> > Nothing that claimed to be gender specific.
> > Nothing that's warlike or non-pacific.
>
> > No candy or sweets...they were bad for the tooth.
> > Nothing that seemed to embellish a truth.
> > And fairy tales, while not yet forbidden,
> > Were like Ken and Barbie, better off hidden.
> > For they raised the hackles of those psychological
> > Who claimed the only good gift was one ecological.
>
> > No baseball, no football...someone could get hurt;
> > Besides, playing sports exposed kids to dirt.
> > Dolls were said to be sexist, and should be passé;
> > And Nintendo would rot your entire brain away.
>
> > So Santa just stood there, disheveled, perplexed;
> > He just could not figure out what to do next.
> > He tried to be merry, tried to be gay,
> > But you've got to be careful with that word today.
> > His sack was quite empty, limp to the ground;
> > Nothing fully acceptable was to be found.
> > Something special was needed, a gift that he might
> > Give to all without angering the left or the right.
> > A gift that would satisfy, with no indecision,
> > Each group of people, every religion;
> > Every ethnicity, every hue,
> > Everyone, everywhere...even you.
> > So here is that gift, it's price beyond worth...
> > "May you and your loved ones enjoy peace on earth."
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community 
> > athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Politically Correct

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Politically Correct

'Twas the night before Christmas and Santa's a wreck...
How to live in a world that's politically correct?
His workers no longer would answer to "Elves".
"Vertically Challenged" they were calling themselves.
And labor conditions at the north pole
Were alleged by the union to stifle the soul.
Four reindeer had vanished, without much propriety,
Released to the wilds by the Humane Society.
And equal employment had made it quite clear
That Santa had better not use just reindeer.
So Dancer and Donner, Comet and Cupid,
Were replaced with 4 pigs, and you know that looked stupid!

The runners had been removed from his sleigh;
The ruts were termed dangerous by the E.P.A.
And people had started to call for the cops
When they heard sled noises on their roof-tops.
Second-hand smoke from his pipe had his workers quite frightened.
His fur trimmed red suit was called "Unenlightened."

And to show you the strangeness of life's ebbs and flows,
Rudolf was suing over unauthorized use of his nose
And had gone on Geraldo, in front of the nation,
Demanding millions in over-due compensation.

So, half of the reindeer were gone; and his wife,
Who suddenly said she'd enough of this life,
Joined a self-help group, packed, and left in a whiz,
Demanding from now on her title was Ms.

And as for the gifts, why, he'd never had a notion
That making a choice could cause so much commotion.
Nothing of leather, nothing of fur,
Which meant nothing for him. And nothing for her.
Nothing that might be construed to pollute.
Nothing to aim. Nothing to shoot.
Nothing that clamored or made lots of noise.
Nothing for just girls. Or just for the boys.
Nothing that claimed to be gender specific.
Nothing that's warlike or non-pacific.

No candy or sweets...they were bad for the tooth.
Nothing that seemed to embellish a truth.
And fairy tales, while not yet forbidden,
Were like Ken and Barbie, better off hidden.
For they raised the hackles of those psychological
Who claimed the only good gift was one ecological.

No baseball, no football...someone could get hurt;
Besides, playing sports exposed kids to dirt.
Dolls were said to be sexist, and should be passé;
And Nintendo would rot your entire brain away.

So Santa just stood there, disheveled, perplexed;
He just could not figure out what to do next.
He tried to be merry, tried to be gay,
But you've got to be careful with that word today.
His sack was quite empty, limp to the ground;
Nothing fully acceptable was to be found.
Something special was needed, a gift that he might
Give to all without angering the left or the right.
A gift that would satisfy, with no indecision,
Each group of people, every religion;
Every ethnicity, every hue,
Everyone, everywhere...even you.
So here is that gift, it's price beyond worth...
"May you and your loved ones enjoy peace on earth."

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Just popping in to.....

[Mrs. Rabbit]

What does Santa call reindeer who refuse to work?



wait for it




wait for it















DINNER!

:D

On Dec 23, 4:26 pm, NavyBrat  wrote:
> Wish you all a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.
> Peace.

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Just popping in to.....

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Merry Christmas Navy and to all!

Hope Santa brings all of you everything you want!



On Dec 23, 4:26 pm, NavyBrat  wrote:
> Wish you all a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.
> Peace.

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Gotta love the AP and their reporting

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Did you hear the swoosh as it went over your head??  It was
sardonicism Hollywood, nothing more, nothing less.thanks for the
LOL though!

Gotta get to karate class!  My job is never done!

Have a good one!





On Aug 20, 4:33 pm, Hollywood  wrote:
> Mrs, Rabbit,
>
> BTW, "profound" was the word Cold choose to use, I just responding to
> her'him using the same term.
>
> On Aug 20, 2:51 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
>
>
> > LMAO, you need to look up the word *profound*!
>
> > On Aug 18, 3:06 pm, Hollywood  wrote:
>
> > > Cold,
>
> > > Profound things are often quite simple. So why are you working so hard
> > > to over-complicate something so simple?
>
> > > On Aug 18, 1:32 pm, Cold Water  wrote:
>
> > > > Boiled down to the bare bones, you basically stated:  there are black
> > > > criminals and there are white criminals.  What could *I* possibly add to
> > > > your compelling and ever so profound remarks?
>
> > > > CW
>
> > > > - Original Message -
> > > > From: "Hollywood" 
> > > > To: "PoliticalForum" 
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 11:14
> > > > Subject: Re: Gotta love the AP and their reporting
>
> > > > Cold,
>
> > > > Yeah sure. You have something to actually say regarding the thread
> > > > subject or my post or what?
>
> > > > On Aug 18, 10:05 am, Cold Water  wrote:
> > > > > "Just stupid" would be a monumental improvement for Woody. Woody is as
> > > > > thick as a wooden plank (thus my nic for him) and has the mentality 
> > > > > of a
> > > > > junkyard dog. It is all truly amazing to watch...
>
> > > > > The wheels are falling off the wagon for Woody's boy Obama and Woody 
> > > > > don't
> > > > > like 'dat. Of course, Woody's first choice was John Scumbag For 
> > > > > Cheating
> > > > > On
> > > > > His Cancer Stricken Wife Edwards. Like I said, AMAZING!
>
> > > > > Unless you have a great deal of time to dedicate to the always 
> > > > > pointless
> > > > > circular discussion, you may want to avoid Woody (like the plague). 
> > > > > LOL
>
> > > > > CW
> > > > > P.S. My post will distract him (red meat for the junkyard dog) Mrs. 
> > > > > R. We
> > > > > wouldn't want Woody to decide to make some hasen-effin'-pfeffer in
> > > > > response
> > > > > to your post.  :-)))
>
> > > > > - Original Message -
> > > > > From: "Mrs. Rabbit" 
> > > > > To: "PoliticalForum" 
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 07:07
> > > > > Subject: Re: Gotta love the AP and their reporting
>
> > > > > LOL Hollywood, are you blind or just stupid.oh why
> > > > > bother..stupid is as stupid does.your failure to *GET IT*
> > > > > doesn't surprise me!
>
> > > > > Doesn't it make you dizzy to keep spinning like a top?? Soon, you'll
> > > > > fall down and bump your wittle head, be sure to keep your helment on
> > > > > now!
>
> > > > > Have a good day!
> > > > > :o)
>
> > > > > On Aug 17, 11:01 pm, Hollywood  wrote:
> > > > > > Mrs. Rabbit,
>
> > > > > > Don't talk the same insipid nonsense as Plain. Black people are NOT
> > > > > > criminals, SOME black people most certainly are criminals. I'm all 
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > locking up ANYONE of ANY race after a fair and proper trial.
> > > > > > I'd be just fine had the store owner killed all four of the robbers.
> > > > > > I'd be just as happy had all four been fair-skinned lads with blue
> > > > > > eyes and blond hair.
> > > > > > Bull-shit, the boogie-men Al & Jesse are not going to descend on
> > > > > > anyone for merely reporting the robbers were black. And if they did,
> > > > > > screw em', who really cares?
>
> > > > > > On Aug 17, 9:25 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
> > > > > > > The media doesn't want black people to be viewed as criminals 
> > > > > > > despite
> > > > > 

Re: Gotta love the AP and their reporting

[Mrs. Rabbit]

"And my response to you is "so?" as well."

I didn't really expect anything more.


"What's your answer to the
problem?"

Read my last post on the subject, it clearly states what *I* feel
needs to take place before progress can begin.

 "We all just supposed to sit around and chant "we hate black
people", as if that would change anything? "

  What are you trying to insinuate?   Oh nevermind.I
really don't care, you're just another name out there in cyberspace.
Chant on buddy!

"You're either part of the problem or part of the solution."

NO WAY???  Did you think of this all on your own??  Yippie for you!

Just so ya know, these are rhetorical questions!

Hate on bro!

http://dictionary.reference.com/ <-------- Just trying to be
helpful!  :o)






On Aug 19, 9:10 pm, Hollywood  wrote:
> Mrs. Rabbit,
>
> And my response to you is "so?" as well. What's your answer to the
> problem? We all just supposed to sit around and chant "we hate black
> people", as if that would change anything?
> You're either part of the problem or part of the solution.
>
> On Aug 19, 7:17 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Black people are NOT
> > criminals, SOME black people most certainly are criminals."
>
> > Yeah, so?  But statics show that black men are 7 times more likely to
> > commit a crime than a white man.  NO?
>
> > " I'm all for
> > locking up ANYONE of ANY race after a fair and proper trial."
>
> > I concur.
>
> > "I'd be just fine had the store owner killed all four of the robbers.
> > I'd be just as happy had all four been fair-skinned lads with blue
> > eyes and blond hair."
>
> > Same as I would have been with any other race, not just black or
> > white.
>
> > "Bull-shit, the boogie-men Al & Jesse are not going to descend on
> > anyone for merely reporting the robbers were black."
>
> > Your opinion is noted, but not shared.
>
> >  "And if they did,
> > screw em', who really cares?"
>
> > Well, duh, I care!  I would like nothing more than to put all this
> > racisim crap behind us as a country, but it doesn't appear likely in
> > my life though.  To heal, we must first accept the fact we are
> > all equal.   Reporting news shouldn't be limited due to race, but it
> > happens all the time.  Like I said:
>
> > "The media doesn't want black people to be viewed as criminals
> > despite
> > the fact that a black man is 7 times more likely to commit a violent
> > crime than a white person.   They simply do not want to be accused of
> > being racist and have the likes of Al Sharpton and/or Jesse Jackson
> > cast upon them in a rage of fury.  It's called taking the high road
> > in
> > these parts "--I stand by my post.
>
> > Now, if you don't agree, so be it, for there is little I concur with
> > most of your post anyways.  But this foul language you use to reply to
> > me is not acceptable and not warranted.  As for slinking off.you
> > wouldn't be so lucky! ;)
>
> > On Aug 18, 11:11 am, Hollywood  wrote:
>
> > > Mrs,
>
> > > Tell me what was not completely factual about my post.
> > > You fuckin' can't ,and you can't even expalin your own position, so
> > > now you'll slink off muttering how I just "don't get it". LMAO!
>
> > > On Aug 18, 6:07 am, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
> > > > LOL Hollywood, are you blind or just stupid.oh why
> > > > bother..stupid is as stupid does.your failure to *GET IT*
> > > > doesn't surprise me!
>
> > > > Doesn't it make you dizzy to keep spinning like a top??  Soon, you'll
> > > > fall down and bump your wittle head, be sure to keep your helment on
> > > > now!
>
> > > > Have a good day!
> > > > :o)
>
> > > > On Aug 17, 11:01 pm, Hollywood  wrote:
>
> > > > > Mrs. Rabbit,
>
> > > > > Don't talk the same insipid nonsense as Plain. Black people are NOT
> > > > > criminals, SOME black people most certainly are criminals. I'm all for
> > > > > locking up ANYONE of ANY race after a fair and proper trial.
> > > > > I'd be just fine had the store owner killed all four of the robbers.
> > > > > I'd be just as happy had all four been fair-skinned lads with blue
> > > > > eyes and blond hair.
&g

Re: Gotta love the AP and their reporting

[Mrs. Rabbit]

LMAO, you need to look up the word *profound*!



On Aug 18, 3:06 pm, Hollywood  wrote:
> Cold,
>
> Profound things are often quite simple. So why are you working so hard
> to over-complicate something so simple?
>
> On Aug 18, 1:32 pm, Cold Water  wrote:
>
>
>
> > Boiled down to the bare bones, you basically stated:  there are black
> > criminals and there are white criminals.  What could *I* possibly add to
> > your compelling and ever so profound remarks?
>
> > CW
>
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Hollywood" 
> > To: "PoliticalForum" 
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 11:14
> > Subject: Re: Gotta love the AP and their reporting
>
> > Cold,
>
> > Yeah sure. You have something to actually say regarding the thread
> > subject or my post or what?
>
> > On Aug 18, 10:05 am, Cold Water  wrote:
> > > "Just stupid" would be a monumental improvement for Woody. Woody is as
> > > thick as a wooden plank (thus my nic for him) and has the mentality of a
> > > junkyard dog. It is all truly amazing to watch...
>
> > > The wheels are falling off the wagon for Woody's boy Obama and Woody don't
> > > like 'dat. Of course, Woody's first choice was John Scumbag For Cheating
> > > On
> > > His Cancer Stricken Wife Edwards. Like I said, AMAZING!
>
> > > Unless you have a great deal of time to dedicate to the always pointless
> > > circular discussion, you may want to avoid Woody (like the plague). LOL
>
> > > CW
> > > P.S. My post will distract him (red meat for the junkyard dog) Mrs. R. We
> > > wouldn't want Woody to decide to make some hasen-effin'-pfeffer in
> > > response
> > > to your post.  :-)))
>
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Mrs. Rabbit" 
> > > To: "PoliticalForum" 
> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 07:07
> > > Subject: Re: Gotta love the AP and their reporting
>
> > > LOL Hollywood, are you blind or just stupid.oh why
> > > bother..stupid is as stupid does.your failure to *GET IT*
> > > doesn't surprise me!
>
> > > Doesn't it make you dizzy to keep spinning like a top?? Soon, you'll
> > > fall down and bump your wittle head, be sure to keep your helment on
> > > now!
>
> > > Have a good day!
> > > :o)
>
> > > On Aug 17, 11:01 pm, Hollywood  wrote:
> > > > Mrs. Rabbit,
>
> > > > Don't talk the same insipid nonsense as Plain. Black people are NOT
> > > > criminals, SOME black people most certainly are criminals. I'm all for
> > > > locking up ANYONE of ANY race after a fair and proper trial.
> > > > I'd be just fine had the store owner killed all four of the robbers.
> > > > I'd be just as happy had all four been fair-skinned lads with blue
> > > > eyes and blond hair.
> > > > Bull-shit, the boogie-men Al & Jesse are not going to descend on
> > > > anyone for merely reporting the robbers were black. And if they did,
> > > > screw em', who really cares?
>
> > > > On Aug 17, 9:25 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
> > > > > The media doesn't want black people to be viewed as criminals despite
> > > > > the fact that a black man is 7 times more likely to commit a violent
> > > > > crime than a white person. They simply do not want to be accused of
> > > > > being racist and have the likes of Al Sharpton and/or Jesse Jackson
> > > > > cast upon them in a rage of fury. It's called taking the high road in
> > > > > these parts
>
> > > > > Like it or not, it is what it is.
>
> > > > > On Aug 17, 5:27 pm, Hollywood  wrote:
>
> > > > > > Zeb,
>
> > > > > > The minutia here is the race of the suspects. What is the media
> > > > > > "protecting" minorities from?
>
> > > > > > On Aug 17, 2:42 pm, Zebnick  wrote:
>
> > > > > > > You are, again, intentionally missing the point. This obsession
> > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > minutia is hardly a credible retort. The media's intentional
> > > > > > > "protection" of minorities by concealing their identities in news
> > > > > > > articles is a form of racism. Expecting that the minority
> > > > > > >

Re: Gotta love the AP and their reporting

[Mrs. Rabbit]

"Black people are NOT
criminals, SOME black people most certainly are criminals."

Yeah, so?  But statics show that black men are 7 times more likely to
commit a crime than a white man.  NO?


" I'm all for
locking up ANYONE of ANY race after a fair and proper trial."

I concur.

"I'd be just fine had the store owner killed all four of the robbers.
I'd be just as happy had all four been fair-skinned lads with blue
eyes and blond hair."

Same as I would have been with any other race, not just black or
white.


"Bull-shit, the boogie-men Al & Jesse are not going to descend on
anyone for merely reporting the robbers were black."

Your opinion is noted, but not shared.


 "And if they did,
screw em', who really cares?"

Well, duh, I care!  I would like nothing more than to put all this
racisim crap behind us as a country, but it doesn't appear likely in
my life though.  To heal, we must first accept the fact we are
all equal.   Reporting news shouldn't be limited due to race, but it
happens all the time.  Like I said:

"The media doesn't want black people to be viewed as criminals
despite
the fact that a black man is 7 times more likely to commit a violent
crime than a white person.   They simply do not want to be accused of
being racist and have the likes of Al Sharpton and/or Jesse Jackson
cast upon them in a rage of fury.  It's called taking the high road
in
these parts "--I stand by my post.




Now, if you don't agree, so be it, for there is little I concur with
most of your post anyways.  But this foul language you use to reply to
me is not acceptable and not warranted.  As for slinking off.you
wouldn't be so lucky! ;)

















On Aug 18, 11:11 am, Hollywood  wrote:
> Mrs,
>
> Tell me what was not completely factual about my post.
> You fuckin' can't ,and you can't even expalin your own position, so
> now you'll slink off muttering how I just "don't get it". LMAO!
>
> On Aug 18, 6:07 am, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
>
>
> > LOL Hollywood, are you blind or just stupid.oh why
> > bother..stupid is as stupid does.your failure to *GET IT*
> > doesn't surprise me!
>
> > Doesn't it make you dizzy to keep spinning like a top??  Soon, you'll
> > fall down and bump your wittle head, be sure to keep your helment on
> > now!
>
> > Have a good day!
> > :o)
>
> > On Aug 17, 11:01 pm, Hollywood  wrote:
>
> > > Mrs. Rabbit,
>
> > > Don't talk the same insipid nonsense as Plain. Black people are NOT
> > > criminals, SOME black people most certainly are criminals. I'm all for
> > > locking up ANYONE of ANY race after a fair and proper trial.
> > > I'd be just fine had the store owner killed all four of the robbers.
> > > I'd be just as happy had all four been fair-skinned lads with blue
> > > eyes and blond hair.
> > > Bull-shit, the boogie-men Al & Jesse are not going to descend on
> > > anyone for merely reporting the robbers were black. And if they did,
> > > screw em', who really cares?
>
> > > On Aug 17, 9:25 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
> > > > The media doesn't want black people to be viewed as criminals despite
> > > > the fact that a black man is 7 times more likely to commit a violent
> > > > crime than a white person.   They simply do not want to be accused of
> > > > being racist and have the likes of Al Sharpton and/or Jesse Jackson
> > > > cast upon them in a rage of fury.  It's called taking the high road in
> > > > these parts
>
> > > > Like it or not, it is what it is.
>
> > > > On Aug 17, 5:27 pm, Hollywood  wrote:
>
> > > > > Zeb,
>
> > > > > The minutia here is the race of the suspects. What is the media
> > > > > "protecting" minorities from?
>
> > > > > On Aug 17, 2:42 pm, Zebnick  wrote:
>
> > > > > > You are, again, intentionally missing the point. This obsession with
> > > > > > minutia is hardly a credible retort. The media's intentional
> > > > > > "protection" of minorities by concealing their identities in news
> > > > > > articles is a form of racism. Expecting that the minority community
> > > > > > cannot handle the light of day and/or act to solve their own 
> > > > > > problems,
> > > > > > is a lowered expectation of their abilities, otherwise called 
> > > > > > RACISM.
>
> > > &

Re: A Gentle Reminder.....

[Mrs. Rabbit]

People of good character don't require rules.

Words to live by:

Do the right thing because it's the right thing to do.



On Aug 18, 8:04 pm, Keith In Tampa  wrote:
> Good Evening Members!!
>
> Just a friendly, good natured, hospitable, cheerful, "In The Spirit Of
> Diplomacy"; non-partisan  reminder of what our unofficial motto is here in
> PoliticalForum:
>
> "We Are Not Euwetopia"!!
>
> Enough with the mudslinging, nasty personal barbs, and cutting remarks!!
>
> About thirty years ago, as I was leaning out of the passenger side window of
> a 1975 Monte Carlo, shooting off these huge bottle rockets (aptly named,
> "Sky Monkeys Invade The Heaven Palace~~Light Fuse~~Get Away!")  at folks on
> the sidewalk right outside of downtown Tampa, when an old Black man yelled
> out to me:
>
> "Cool It Wid Da Fire Rockets Baby!!"
>
> The same thing applies here in PF.
>
> Stop it!! You know who you are!!
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Keith In Tampa
> The Genteel Co-Moderator
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Gotta love the AP and their reporting

[Mrs. Rabbit]

LOL Hollywood, are you blind or just stupid.oh why
bother..stupid is as stupid does.your failure to *GET IT*
doesn't surprise me!

Doesn't it make you dizzy to keep spinning like a top??  Soon, you'll
fall down and bump your wittle head, be sure to keep your helment on
now!


Have a good day!
:o)






On Aug 17, 11:01 pm, Hollywood  wrote:
> Mrs. Rabbit,
>
> Don't talk the same insipid nonsense as Plain. Black people are NOT
> criminals, SOME black people most certainly are criminals. I'm all for
> locking up ANYONE of ANY race after a fair and proper trial.
> I'd be just fine had the store owner killed all four of the robbers.
> I'd be just as happy had all four been fair-skinned lads with blue
> eyes and blond hair.
> Bull-shit, the boogie-men Al & Jesse are not going to descend on
> anyone for merely reporting the robbers were black. And if they did,
> screw em', who really cares?
>
> On Aug 17, 9:25 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
>
>
> > The media doesn't want black people to be viewed as criminals despite
> > the fact that a black man is 7 times more likely to commit a violent
> > crime than a white person.   They simply do not want to be accused of
> > being racist and have the likes of Al Sharpton and/or Jesse Jackson
> > cast upon them in a rage of fury.  It's called taking the high road in
> > these parts
>
> > Like it or not, it is what it is.
>
> > On Aug 17, 5:27 pm, Hollywood  wrote:
>
> > > Zeb,
>
> > > The minutia here is the race of the suspects. What is the media
> > > "protecting" minorities from?
>
> > > On Aug 17, 2:42 pm, Zebnick  wrote:
>
> > > > You are, again, intentionally missing the point. This obsession with
> > > > minutia is hardly a credible retort. The media's intentional
> > > > "protection" of minorities by concealing their identities in news
> > > > articles is a form of racism. Expecting that the minority community
> > > > cannot handle the light of day and/or act to solve their own problems,
> > > > is a lowered expectation of their abilities, otherwise called RACISM.
>
> > > > On Aug 17, 12:06 pm, Hollywood  wrote:
>
> > > > > Zeb,
>
> > > > > Didn't use the word "should" I used the word "expect". Mean entirely
> > > > > different things. Well hell, I find the subject of what brand and type
> > > > > of shotgun the store owner used more interesting than the race of the
> > > > > robbers. Was it a pump or semi-automatic? What kind of loads did he
> > > > > use? You're always talking about "what if's".
>
> > > > > On Aug 17, 10:43 am, Zebnick  wrote:
>
> > > > > > Where did I say people should be "obsessed with race?" I'm 
> > > > > > addressing
> > > > > > the subject of this thread, which is the media's attempt to white 
> > > > > > wash
> > > > > > race out of certain stories. In the NY papers, even stories where
> > > > > > someone is attacked and the perp is at large, the race of the 
> > > > > > attacker
> > > > > > will be left out. This is starting to change now, but for YEARS, the
> > > > > > most obvious defining attribute in a persons description was
> > > > > > eliminated from stories. Unless the perp was white, of course. I 
> > > > > > don't
> > > > > > think the race of the perps is particularly relevant in this story,
> > > > > > since no one is on the lam. But if  these guys had been white and
> > > > > > pistol whipped employees in a black owned store in a white
> > > > > > neighborhood, you know as well as I do that their race would have 
> > > > > > been
> > > > > > identified and scores of reporters would have be toiling to find out
> > > > > > if they had ANY connection to white supremist groups.
>
> > > > > > On Aug 17, 11:30 am, Hollywood  wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Zeb,
>
> > > > > > > You expect EVERYONE to be obessed with race? Why?
>
> > > > > > > On Aug 17, 9:20 am, Zebnick  wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > The race of the perps is interesting in as much as the media 
> > > > > > > > avoids
> > > > > > > > it. When an innocent black man is shot by 

Re: political email

[Mrs. Rabbit]

WOW!  I'm going to pass this on!

Thanks Plainolyou get an A+!  ;)



On Aug 17, 3:55 pm, plainolamerican  wrote:
> Dear Conservative Friend,
>
> In July 2007, Barack Obama promised a group of his supporters that, if
> elected president, he would sign perhaps the most evil piece of
> legislation in the history of our republic.
>
> It's called the "Freedom of Choice Act," or FOCA -- but don't let the
> Orwellian title fool you. It isn't about "freedom" or "choice" at all.
> It's about forcing each and every American citizen -- regardless of
> his or her view on abortion -- to support abortion-on-demand not just
> as a "fundamental right" but as a taxpayer-funded entitlement.
>
> But the compulsion wouldn't stop there. Because FOCA would also run
> roughshod over the conscience rights of doctors, nurses, and hospitals
> that oppose abortion on religious or moral grounds -- forcing them to
> provide or counsel for abortion or face professional de-certification,
> loss of funding, lawsuits, and even prosecution.
>
> Not only that, FOCA would immediately strike down any and all state
> restrictions on abortion -- even those with wide popular support, such
> as prohibitions on partial-birth abortion and parental notification
> requirements for minors seeking abortions.
>
> Make no mistake: FOCA is the most radical piece of pro-abortion
> legislation ever proposed, one that would go far beyond Roe v. Wade in
> making abortion a government-protected and taxpayer-supported "right,"
> through all nine months of pregnancy.
>
> That's why I'm asking you today to support HUMAN EVENTS in its efforts
> to stop this outrageous piece of legislation before it ever reaches
> President Obama's desk.
>
> Let me explain why this is possible -- and how
> HUMAN EVENTS plans to do it...
> You see, in his 2007 campaign pledge to Planned Parenthood members,
> Obama promised that signing FOCA would be "the first thing I'd do as
> president." The only reason he hasn't followed through on that promise
> is that Democratic-controlled Congress has yet to introduce and pass
> it.
>
> Why the delay? For one thing, they've had bigger fish to fry -- such
> as trillion-dollar "stimulus" packages and a new government-run health
> care system. They learned from Bill Clinton's immediate post-election
> action on gays in the military not to squander a new president's
> honeymoon period on divisive social legislation.
>
> But also, by delaying, they can lull their pro-life opponents into
> thinking that FOCA has been tabled, while quietly building support for
> it in a stealth propaganda campaign that is already underway using
> major media outlets -- such as the Washington Post, which recently ran
> a piece in its "On Faith" section called "Why Fear FOCA?"
>
> But with your help, HUMAN EVENTS will defeat the pro-abortionists'
> "stealth" media campaign with its own media blitzkrieg designed to
> counter pro-FOCA lies and propaganda with the facts.
>
> Here's how it will work...
> The main weapon in HUMAN EVENTS' media blitzkrieg will be an in-depth
> Special Report called, "The Facts About FOCA: Truth vs. Propaganda in
> the Battle Over the Most Radical Pro-Abortion Law in American
> History."
>
> Written in consultation with the finest legal minds of our time, "The
> Facts About FOCA" will reveal how, despite pro-abortionists' attempts
> to soft-pedal its potential impact in order to ensure swift passage,
> the Freedom of Choice Act would:
> Establish abortion as a "fundamental right," elevating it to the same
> status as the right to vote and the right to free speech -- going
> beyond any Supreme Court decision in enshrining unlimited abortion-on-
> demand into American law
>
> Eliminate every restriction on abortion nationwide -- including 44
> states' laws concerning parental involvement, 40 states' laws on
> restricting later-term abortions, 46 states' conscience protection
> laws for individual health care providers, 27 states' conscience
> protection laws for institutions, 38 states' bans on partial-birth
> abortions, 33 states' laws on requiring counseling before an abortion,
> and 16 states' laws concerning ultrasounds before an abortion
>
> Compel taxpayer funding of abortions through state and federal welfare
> programs, federal employee insurance plans, and in military
> hospitals.
>
> Force faith-based hospitals and healthcare facilities to perform
> abortions
>
> Force doctors and nurses to provide counseling and referral for
> abortions
> But creating "The Facts About FOCA" is just the beginning. HUMAN
> EVENTS will then publicize and distribute it on a massive scale, both
> in print versions and online, to provoke a massive outpouring of voter
> outrage that will stop this evil law from being enacted.
>
> Included among the activists, opinion-makers, and other influential
> citizens to whom HUMAN EVENTS will distribute "The Facts About FOCA"
> will be:
> Pro-life, conservative, and/or Republican activist groups on HUMAN
> EVE

Re: Gotta love the AP and their reporting

[Mrs. Rabbit]

The media doesn't want black people to be viewed as criminals despite
the fact that a black man is 7 times more likely to commit a violent
crime than a white person.   They simply do not want to be accused of
being racist and have the likes of Al Sharpton and/or Jesse Jackson
cast upon them in a rage of fury.  It's called taking the high road in
these parts

Like it or not, it is what it is.



On Aug 17, 5:27 pm, Hollywood  wrote:
> Zeb,
>
> The minutia here is the race of the suspects. What is the media
> "protecting" minorities from?
>
> On Aug 17, 2:42 pm, Zebnick  wrote:
>
>
>
> > You are, again, intentionally missing the point. This obsession with
> > minutia is hardly a credible retort. The media's intentional
> > "protection" of minorities by concealing their identities in news
> > articles is a form of racism. Expecting that the minority community
> > cannot handle the light of day and/or act to solve their own problems,
> > is a lowered expectation of their abilities, otherwise called RACISM.
>
> > On Aug 17, 12:06 pm, Hollywood  wrote:
>
> > > Zeb,
>
> > > Didn't use the word "should" I used the word "expect". Mean entirely
> > > different things. Well hell, I find the subject of what brand and type
> > > of shotgun the store owner used more interesting than the race of the
> > > robbers. Was it a pump or semi-automatic? What kind of loads did he
> > > use? You're always talking about "what if's".
>
> > > On Aug 17, 10:43 am, Zebnick  wrote:
>
> > > > Where did I say people should be "obsessed with race?" I'm addressing
> > > > the subject of this thread, which is the media's attempt to white wash
> > > > race out of certain stories. In the NY papers, even stories where
> > > > someone is attacked and the perp is at large, the race of the attacker
> > > > will be left out. This is starting to change now, but for YEARS, the
> > > > most obvious defining attribute in a persons description was
> > > > eliminated from stories. Unless the perp was white, of course. I don't
> > > > think the race of the perps is particularly relevant in this story,
> > > > since no one is on the lam. But if  these guys had been white and
> > > > pistol whipped employees in a black owned store in a white
> > > > neighborhood, you know as well as I do that their race would have been
> > > > identified and scores of reporters would have be toiling to find out
> > > > if they had ANY connection to white supremist groups.
>
> > > > On Aug 17, 11:30 am, Hollywood  wrote:
>
> > > > > Zeb,
>
> > > > > You expect EVERYONE to be obessed with race? Why?
>
> > > > > On Aug 17, 9:20 am, Zebnick  wrote:
>
> > > > > > The race of the perps is interesting in as much as the media avoids
> > > > > > it. When an innocent black man is shot by a white man, by accident 
> > > > > > or
> > > > > > on purpose, you will never see a reference to the shooter that 
> > > > > > doesn't
> > > > > > include the word "white." The avoidance of identifying the race of
> > > > > > minority criminals started about ten or fifteen years ago, at least
> > > > > > around NYC, because minority groups complained that the constant
> > > > > > pictures and references to minority murderers, robbers or rapists
> > > > > > painted their entire race or community or culture as criminal. The
> > > > > > exclusion of the race of a perp in stories about crime seemed 
> > > > > > awkward
> > > > > > and absurd when they started it and it still is.
>
> > > > > > On Aug 17, 9:59 am, Hollywood  wrote:
>
> > > > > > > plain,
>
> > > > > > > Are you fucking stupid or what? Tell me why the race of the 
> > > > > > > suspects
> > > > > > > is important to this story. The suspects are either dead or 
> > > > > > > wounded
> > > > > > > and in custody. It's not as if the posse needs a full description 
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > order the apprehend them.
>
> > > > > > > On Aug 16, 10:08 pm, plainolamerican 
> > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > >  You going to expalin what it is "everyone knows"
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > that the media protects minorities and their crimes
>
> > > > > > > > spit or swallow, fuckhead
> > > > > > > > then esad
>
> > > > > > > > On Aug 16, 9:38 pm, Hollywood  
> > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > plain,
>
> > > > > > > > > #4 buckshot dosen't give a fuck what your race is, why should 
> > > > > > > > > I? What?
> > > > > > > > > You pissed at a missed opportunity to spread more hate and 
> > > > > > > > > fear?
>
> > > > > > > > > That's not an awswer to my question. You going to expalin 
> > > > > > > > > what it is
> > > > > > > > > "everyone knows" or fuckin' NOT? C'mon big mouth, your "some 
> > > > > > > > > don't
> > > > > > > > > forget" dosen't mean jack-shit to me.
>
> > > > > > > > > On Aug 16, 9:19 pm, plainolamerican 
> > > > > > > > >  wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > Personally I don't give a fuck what their race was.
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > of course you don't - liberals try to ignore the

Re: Gotta love the AP and their reporting

[Mrs. Rabbit]

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny_crime/2009/08/14/2009-08-14_harlem_business_owner_charles_gus_augusto_opens_shop_day_after_fatally_shooting_.html



On Aug 16, 10:34 am, plainolamerican 
wrote:
> notice they didn't reveal the race or names of the perps?
> no photos?
> no crying parents?
>
> everyone knows why not
>
> On Aug 15, 2:27 pm, dick thompson  wrote:
>
>
>
> >http://pajamasmedia.com/vodkapundit/2009/08/15/oh-that-biased-media-3/- Hide 
> >quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Gotta love the AP and their reporting

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Gawd dick.the man gave warning shots!  That's just nuts!  Wonder
if it would have even made it on MSNBC if he had been not only robbed,
but murdered?  I understand the need to report all sides, but this is
really over the top to me!



On Aug 15, 3:27 pm, dick thompson  wrote:
> http://pajamasmedia.com/vodkapundit/2009/08/15/oh-that-biased-media-3/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: The Frightened Suicidal MOB.

[Mrs. Rabbit]

This is what came to mind while reading your thread!  LOL.No
kidding!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZW8TlrYhBxk

:o)



On Aug 15, 11:23 pm, VT Sean Lewis  wrote:
> The Frightened Suicidal MOB
>
> Sean Lewis
> August 15, 2009
>
> I have come to the conclusion that there is a group
> of Americans who are ruled by emotions, primarily
> fear and anger, and not by reason or facts.
>
> I can come to no other conclusion to explain the
> behavior of those who vote and act against their own
> self interests.
>
> The MOB, for lack of a better word; seem to be herded
> from one fear based lie to another fear based lie. Lies
> that feed their anger and resentment and the powerlessness
> they feel since the elections.
>
> These individuals had faith in a core of beliefs that have
> been proven to be false in a spectacular fashion, the
> near collapse of the Country in the fall of 2008.
>
> These people who feel betrayed, rather than taking
> the responsible action of reevaluating their beliefs,
> have instead taken the emotional stance of denial
> attacking everything that contradicted their
> reality.
>
> These people need to have their beliefs reaffirmed,
> it is similar to finding out the world is not flat in
> their universe. They are incapable of making the
> adjustment.
>
> This means embracing ideas that are not based on facts
> and reality, but blind ignorant faith, misinformation and
> half truths.
>
> Because of this fear based mentality these individuals
> are easily manipulated.
>
> This can be seen by the Birther movement, the Tea Party
> Movement, the Deathers. All herded to betray Americas
> best hope for recovery. The very people who brought
> the Country to the brink of disaster are now the same
> people who are striving to stop all attempts to fix their
> mistakes by using these disallusioned individuals
>
> This is not about the best interest of the United States,
> but the best interests of the recently unempowered,
> and their need to recover power no matter what the
> cost even if it means the failure of the country. The
> cannon fodder of this rebellion are the Frightened
> Suicidal MOB.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: The Frightened Suicidal MOB.

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Whew, for a minute there, I thought VT had switched sides! (It's not
like that would be a GOOD thing, just different I suppose.)






On Aug 16, 4:30 am, plainolamerican  wrote:
> there is a group
> of Americans who are ruled by emotions, primarily
> fear and anger, and not by reason or facts
> 
> yep - socialist liberals
>
> On Aug 15, 10:23 pm, VT Sean Lewis  wrote:
>
>
>
> > The Frightened Suicidal MOB
>
> > Sean Lewis
> > August 15, 2009
>
> > I have come to the conclusion that there is a group
> > of Americans who are ruled by emotions, primarily
> > fear and anger, and not by reason or facts.
>
> > I can come to no other conclusion to explain the
> > behavior of those who vote and act against their own
> > self interests.
>
> > The MOB, for lack of a better word; seem to be herded
> > from one fear based lie to another fear based lie. Lies
> > that feed their anger and resentment and the powerlessness
> > they feel since the elections.
>
> > These individuals had faith in a core of beliefs that have
> > been proven to be false in a spectacular fashion, the
> > near collapse of the Country in the fall of 2008.
>
> > These people who feel betrayed, rather than taking
> > the responsible action of reevaluating their beliefs,
> > have instead taken the emotional stance of denial
> > attacking everything that contradicted their
> > reality.
>
> > These people need to have their beliefs reaffirmed,
> > it is similar to finding out the world is not flat in
> > their universe. They are incapable of making the
> > adjustment.
>
> > This means embracing ideas that are not based on facts
> > and reality, but blind ignorant faith, misinformation and
> > half truths.
>
> > Because of this fear based mentality these individuals
> > are easily manipulated.
>
> > This can be seen by the Birther movement, the Tea Party
> > Movement, the Deathers. All herded to betray Americas
> > best hope for recovery. The very people who brought
> > the Country to the brink of disaster are now the same
> > people who are striving to stop all attempts to fix their
> > mistakes by using these disallusioned individuals
>
> > This is not about the best interest of the United States,
> > but the best interests of the recently unempowered,
> > and their need to recover power no matter what the
> > cost even if it means the failure of the country. The
> > cannon fodder of this rebellion are the Frightened
> > Suicidal MOB.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Poor little bratty republicans

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Paint with a broad brush often Studio?

Same could be said for the *otherside* as well

“Trust but verify”  regardless of the party!

It's your hard lefts and rights that hang up our progress.at one
point, we really should try to meet in the middle.  It's the only way
I see true change.  Whatever happen to *United We Stand*?  For we
know, to divide, we fall.





On Aug 10, 10:56 pm, studio  wrote:
> They don't have anything to sell except fear and loathing.
>
> What a pathetic little group of brats.
>
> Reminds me of the Andy Gritth Show episode where the little brat
> thought he could get whatever he wanted by throwing a temper tantrum,
> and wanting his father to show Andy how tough he was by going to jail
> in his behalf.
> Then Andy pointed out to the father that he had a nice wood shed out
> back.
>
> Imagine if your business had nothing but fear and rumor mongers like
> them?
> You wouldn't be able to get anything done, and you'd be out of
> business.
>
> They're much like Caligula, and believe in appointing their horse to
> high office.
> They believe in the stupidity of people to buy what they're
> sellingwhich is a
> nice empty bottle that they farted in, but they claim if you sniff it
> deeply enough you'll come to appreciate the smell of their caca.
>
> We have nothing to fear except ferepublicanism itself.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Does anyone on this forum read?

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Will do!

:o)



On Aug 8, 11:35 am, THE ANNOINTED ONE  wrote:
> Mrs. R.,
>
> Try The Arms of Krupp.
>
> On Aug 7, 12:26 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
>
>
> > American History or World History?  Either is fine with meI just
> > love history.
>
> > Have you read "Liberty's Blueprint" by Michael Meyerson?   It's next
> > on my list.  :)
>
> > On Aug 6, 8:53 pm, LadybugsTX  wrote:
>
> > > I am not trying to cause yet another senseless argument between the
> > > sides and the inevitable spew of talking points.  I was just curious.
> > > Does anyone actually read books about our history?  I would love to
> > > start some sort of Oprahesque book club where we read a chosen book
> > > and discuss it at length.  If history repeats itself, wouldn't it
> > > behoove all of us to learn a little bit about it?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Does anyone on this forum read?

[Mrs. Rabbit]

American History or World History?  Either is fine with meI just
love history.

Have you read "Liberty's Blueprint" by Michael Meyerson?   It's next
on my list.  :)



On Aug 6, 8:53 pm, LadybugsTX  wrote:
> I am not trying to cause yet another senseless argument between the
> sides and the inevitable spew of talking points.  I was just curious.
> Does anyone actually read books about our history?  I would love to
> start some sort of Oprahesque book club where we read a chosen book
> and discuss it at length.  If history repeats itself, wouldn't it
> behoove all of us to learn a little bit about it?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Cash for Clunkers...

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Check this out!

http://www.cars.gov/files/noteligible.pdf

What do all these vehicles have in common that would result in not
being eligible for the program?



On Aug 6, 2:55 pm, Travis  wrote:
> My '89 Lincoln towncar qualifies.  I noticed that an '87 does not.  ???
>
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:28 AM, Mrs. Rabbit wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Good idea/bad idea?
>
> > I think I'll wait till it backlashes to get a *real* deal on a car!- Hide 
> > quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: A silly squirrelly animation for a fabulously funny but rude pun filled song by DogHorse and Miss Prism

[Mrs. Rabbit]

hehehethe bull looked stoned!



On Aug 6, 2:32 pm, Travis  wrote:
> http://eclectech.co.uk/pettingzoo.php
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Travis, is there any way you and alter ego Dick can STOP spamming the board????

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Wuzup Mark??? How's the jungle??  :D



On Aug 6, 11:34 am, THE ANNOINTED ONE  wrote:
> Travis,
>
> Please keep on your private mailings list as well. I do read most of
> your posts to the group, I just choose that to which I respond. Ignore
> the people that don't realize that like their TV they do not have to
> watch.
>
> On Aug 6, 1:15 am, Travis  wrote:
>
>
>
> > I have no idea what you mean post with out the first pargraphs.  I am not a
> > puter geek and do well to clean up the unnecessaary garbage off the items I
> > post.
> > I get articls all day and night and merely select what i think is the best
> > to post to the grou(s).
>
> > I do not know how to combine them all into a single post except by hand
> > copying the intro and link and I am not taking that much time for any
> > reason.
>
> > So if the moderators want me to limit the number of my posts, I will do
> > that.  To one single cartoon each day and nothing else.
>
> > So until I get some sort of word from the moderators of all three groups, I
> > am not posting any of the delightful toons or current topic articles.
>
> > I will drop posting to any of the groups if asked.
>
> > This note is sent to all three groups.
>
> > Travis
>
> > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:56 PM, RICHARD BROWN
> > wrote:
>
> > > He is NOT unintelligent by the by.  Koreans eat dogs and Chinese eat
> > > cats and almost everything else, but that does not reflect on their
> > > intelligence.  Many groups eat animals, but they are still intelligent
> > > even if misguided nutritionally.
> > > How about it Travis?  Could you post all of the links with or without
> > > the first paragraph or two?
> > > Richard
>
> > > On Aug 5, 12:49 pm, studio  wrote:
> > > > On Aug 3, 8:52 pm, Zebnick  wrote:
>
> > > > > If we say please? You already post all this stuff on the other board.
> > > > > Do you HAVE TO do it here too?
>
> > > > He doesn't understand netiquette, nor does he want to.
> > > > I mean come on, he eats possums for cryin' out loud.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: HR 3200 Page 58 and Choice is a lie !

[Mrs. Rabbit]

This reminded me of The Heller Amendment 2 which would require the
congress to use this plan themselves and all the democrats on the
committee voted against it. If I remember correctly, all the
republicans on the committee voted for it.Go figure!



On Aug 6, 12:06 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
> If this is such a great HR bill, then why isn't congress jumping on
> the bandwagon?  Gee, you would think if it was good enough for the
> people of America, they would be the first in line!
>
> On Aug 6, 11:48 am, Sage2  wrote:
>
>
>
> >                   Page 58 of the health care bill the government has a
> > mandatory requirement that patients will have no choice but than to
> > let your bank & savings accounts be accessed and moneys be withdrawn
> > at the will of the Feds.
>
> >                    Any and all present insurance plans under private
> > employer benefits will be taxed and all such plans have to convert to
> > government single payer plan after five years! Exempt will be
> > government employees, congress and Obamite unions. They are allowed to
> > keep their present advanced premium insurance plans at taxpayer
> > expense.
>
> >                       The socialist/communist, parasite, " sponge
> > monkeys " hard at work stealing your hard earned money.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: HR 3200 Page 58 and Choice is a lie !

[Mrs. Rabbit]

If this is such a great HR bill, then why isn't congress jumping on
the bandwagon?  Gee, you would think if it was good enough for the
people of America, they would be the first in line!



On Aug 6, 11:48 am, Sage2  wrote:
>                   Page 58 of the health care bill the government has a
> mandatory requirement that patients will have no choice but than to
> let your bank & savings accounts be accessed and moneys be withdrawn
> at the will of the Feds.
>
>                    Any and all present insurance plans under private
> employer benefits will be taxed and all such plans have to convert to
> government single payer plan after five years! Exempt will be
> government employees, congress and Obamite unions. They are allowed to
> keep their present advanced premium insurance plans at taxpayer
> expense.
>
>                       The socialist/communist, parasite, " sponge
> monkeys " hard at work stealing your hard earned money.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Health Care Reform is NEEDED NOW! The Republican party is becoming the party of hatred and the destruction of the American dream.

[Mrs. Rabbit]

I concur with you Sage.  ONLY if you fail to pay your taxes can the
IRS garnish your account.



On Aug 6, 11:26 am, Sage2  wrote:
>                        Holly,
>
>                            Only by legal action and garnishing wages
> for tax purposes, not direct deposit style where they would take
> ( steal ) at will without accountability. You your ilk and the PIMP
> ( president in my pocket ) are going to hit a brick wall on this one.
> Time to wake up before you guys hit that wall!
>
> ***­*
>
> On Aug 6, 11:16 am, Hollywood  wrote:
>
>
>
> > Sage2,
>
> > "The Govt." already HAS direct acess to your bank account and has for
> > years. Ask anyone that has had accounts seized by the IRS. You didn't
> > know this?
>
> > On Aug 6, 1:15 am, Sage2  wrote:
>
> > >                    Holly ,
>
> > >                       When you get to page 58, see how the government
> > > will have direct access to your bank account.  My insurance company
> > > does not have access to my account!
>
> > > ***­­­**
>
> > > On Aug 6, 12:23 am, Hollywood  wrote:
>
> > > > Richard,
>
> > > > Frankly, I'll have to pull up HR 3200 and examine it closer before i
> > > > can make an objective and informed comment on it's contents. To date
> > > > I've only read what others CLAIM it contains.
>
> > > > On Aug 5, 11:14 pm, RichardForbes 
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > I am trying to keep an open mind about this and look for the good
> > > > > ideas imbedded in the proposals.  I am not very excited about HR 3200,
> > > > > but the one idea they have correct is the Health Insurance Exchange.
> > > > > The problem is that they take it too far.  There is no need to do
> > > > > that.  Feel free to challenge me on my ideas, as I can only improve
> > > > > them with input from other people with open minds about the topic.  I
> > > > > am not opposed to good reform, but I really do not think that HR 3200
> > > > > is the answer.
>
> > > > > On Aug 5, 10:55 pm, Hollywood  wrote:
>
> > > > > > Richard,
>
> > > > > > Very good idea.
>
> > > > > > On Aug 5, 10:53 pm, RichardForbes 
> > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > We have attempted to make our pension benefits portable.  The same
> > > > > > > idea is important for healthcare, though the implementation is a 
> > > > > > > bit
> > > > > > > different.  I think that the combination of a government clearing
> > > > > > > house for small employers and individuals along with a federal
> > > > > > > exemption similar to ERISA would provide a bsais for the capacity 
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > create a more portable system.  Any person teminated could gain 
> > > > > > > access
> > > > > > > through the clearing house and any person changing employers would
> > > > > > > have the same capacity.  It would eliminate much of the need for
> > > > > > > insurers to have pre-existing condition clauses because the size 
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > the group would be large enough to limit the risk of adverse
> > > > > > > selection.
>
> > > > > > > On Aug 5, 10:46 pm, Hollywood  wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Richard,
>
> > > > > > > > That you have. Nor was my question to you loaded. I do not 
> > > > > > > > believe we
> > > > > > > > have to copy the system of any one nation, not France or 
> > > > > > > > germany or
> > > > > > > > the Swiss, etc. I feel we should, and should have been doing 
> > > > > > > > this for
> > > > > > > > years, carefully examine the systems or several of the nations 
> > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > seem to have the most effective systems and "borrow" the best 
> > > > > > > > ideas
> > > > > > > > from each of them and adopt them to our own country. There is, I
> > > > > > > > believe, no one  "magic bullet". One thing, and one thing only, 
> > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > would help a great deal is to not link health insurance to one's
> > > > > > > > employer. A working man/woman should be able to retain the same
> > > > > > > > insurance he/she has AT THE SAME PRICE from employer to employer
> > > > > > > > without interuption of coverage or benefits. Let a county, 
> > > > > > > > state,
> > > > > > > > whatever take competitive bids from competing insurance 
> > > > > > > > companies to
> > > > > > > > insure perhaps either all it's citizens or perhaps just those 
> > > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > already covered by Medicare. Let the premium be paid out some 
> > > > > > > > sort of
> > > > > > > > interest bearing fund owned by that entity and have safeguards 
> > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > place that prevent that fund for being used for ANYTHING else. 
> > > > > > > > Fund it
> > > > > > > > by taxes levied on all the citizens of that entity. Sure there 
> > > > > > > > will be
> > > > > > > > administrative expenses. Thik we're NOT pa

Re: Health Care Reform is NEEDED NOW! The Republican party is becoming the party of hatred and the destruction of the American dream.

[Mrs. Rabbit]

The same could be asked of ALL of US!  The real question is WTF is
wrong with our government and HOW we can COME TOGETHER as A UNITED
PEOPLE to REPAIR what is broken??  Left wing, right wing, if you read
ALL sources, even off shore news and reports, you will have a better
understanding of others views, as well as a better understanding of
what is *really* going on with our global situations...but some seem
to WANT to be good lil sheeple and follow the sound of the golden
flutestraight to the slaughter house.

Left wing this, right wing thatthat's bullshit all the way
aroundNO matter which party is elected, it's the same ole
bullshit!  Reform is needed, but with less government, IMO.

:o)





On Aug 5, 12:41 pm, Hollywood  wrote:
> Sage2,
>
> Well no fucking shit genius. You do what you want and I'll do what I
> want. WTF is wrong with you?
>
> On Aug 5, 11:36 am, Sage2  wrote:
>
>
>
> >             Holly,
>
> >                    You won't be able to do shit for either you or your
> > family if the intruder shoots you first!  I can see you risking your
> > worthless life but what about your family. Are you willing to take the
> > gamble? The odds are against you . Think about it!  If you have the
> > mental capacity to do so!  Proportion plays no part when your family
> > is in imminent danger. Intruder should noy be there in the first
> > place.
>
> > ***­­**­*­*­**­**
>
> > On Aug 5, 12:14 pm, Hollywood  wrote:
>
> > > frankg,
>
> > > You are absolutely nuts if you think I'm going to sit here all day and
> > > discuss what is fair or  not, what is stealing and what is not. If
> > > that is NOT the point then don't ask me what I'd do if the govt. came
> > > to steal my house. You do not seem to understand the concept of
> > > proportion, or balance or even the common sense of choosing one fights
> > > carefully.
> > > It's like this, I believe I have a right to defend my life and
> > > property. Ok? Regarding proportional response, am I going to kill a
> > > person if he comes into my home and steals my microwave and TV? NO,
> > > that's just stuff and is insured anyway, a human life is more
> > > valuable. If that same person approaches me with a weapon during the
> > > very same incident? Yep, going to blow his head off with my Mossberg.
> > > I value MY life more than His. proportional response.
> > > Where did you sign up to pay for the invasion of Iraq? Do you not
> > > understand the govt. is pretty much going to spend your money any
> > > fucking way it pleases  and that it has pretty much always been that
> > > way? What is it with you people wanting to pretend the Federal Govt.
> > > and all it's faults was just invented 6 months ago? Are you all crazy?
>
> > > I'll draw MY line where I need to, you draws yours as you see fit.
> > > Don't tell me where to draw MY line.
>
> > > On Aug 5, 10:27 am, frankg  wrote:
>
> > > > Hell yeah, and you know... I'm going to be by your side supporting and
> > > > cheering you on the entire way.
>
> > > > But isn't that the point; the idea of 'stealing' from you that which
> > > > is yours so that it can be given to others without your approval is
> > > > UNacceptable and you will defend it. Sometimes we just can't follow
> > > > our Dad's advice about acceptance.
>
> > > > So why do you feel it's acceptable to defend your property (your home)
> > > > from being unfairly taken yet I must accept my property (my income)
> > > > being taken unfairly?  Where are you drawing the line? You can make a
> > > > case I have a moral obligation to pay taxes that will help the needy
> > > > with food, housing and health care, and I can accept that. But where
> > > > did I ever sign up to start bailing out companies that can't run
> > > > competitively?  Where did I ever sign up to start helping my neighbors
> > > > buy new cars?  In my opinion our Government has crossed WAY over the
> > > > line and I am no longer willing to simply accept it as unfair.
>
> > > > On Aug 5, 10:30 am, Hollywood  wrote:
>
> > > > > frankg,
>
> > > > > Any city, state or federal govt. employee that shows up to take my
> > > > > home from me without due cause is going to get shot right between the
> > > > > eyes.
>
> > > > > Now, is THAT direct and simple enough for you to understand?
>
> > > > > On Aug 5, 12:31 am, frankg  wrote:
>
> > > > > > I have no idea but then, that's not what I said.
>
> > > > > > The point I made was;
>
> > > > > > Government reaches into my pocket to help buy itself a majority 
> > > > > > shares
> > > > > > in GM. I don't benefit from this and I'm sure you'd say "life isn't
> > > > > > fair"
> > > > > > Government reaches into my pocket to help hand out up to $4500 to
> > > > > > people who own 'clunkers'. I don't benef

Re: AMBIGUOUS FUNNIES

[Mrs. Rabbit]

"*Michael Jackson is a terrorist. If you spot this smooth criminal
with scary eyes, run away now. "

LMAO, yep, if he's spotted NOW!  Wouldn't that be something eh??  :D



On Aug 6, 9:40 am, Bruce Majors  wrote:
>   ** *If you have set yourself on fire, do not run.* ** *If you spot
> terrorism, blow your anti-terrorism whistle. If you are Vin Diesel, yell
> really loud. * ** *If you spot a terrorist arrow, pin it against the wall
> with your shoulder.* ** *If you are sprayed with an unknown substance, stand
> and think about it instead of seeing a doctor.* ** *Use your flashlight to
> lift the walls right off of you!* ** *To eliminate smallpox, wash with soap,
> water and at least one(1) armless hand under a faucet with no sink.*
> ** *Michael
> Jackson is a terrorist. If you spot this smooth criminal with scary eyes,
> run away now. * ** *People, animal corpses and the biohazard symbol are all
> at risk of being sucked into the time-tunnel vortex.* ** *Be on the lookout
> for terrorists with pinkeye and leprosy. Also, they tend to rub their hands
> together manically.* ** *If a door is closed, karate chop it open.
> * ** *If your building collapses, climb under your table and practice yoga
> postures.* *
> *
>  ** *After exposure to radiation it is important to consider that you may
> have mutated to gigantic dimensions: watch your head.* ** *If you've
> become a radiation mutant with a deformed hand, remember to close the
> window. No one wants to see that.* *
> *
>  ** *Your respiratory and digestive systems are optional. Cast them aside if
> you feel you no longer need them. * ** *If you are trapped under falling
> debris, conserve oxygen by not farting.* ** *Survive a biohazard attack by
> first standing, then begging on your knees, then rolling over and playing
> dead.* ** *Do not drive a station wagon if a utility pole is protruding from
> the hood.* ** *A one-inch thick piece of plywood should be sufficient
> protection against radiation.* ** *No pyromaniacs admitted.* ** *A quick
> family snapshot in front of the latest scene of a terrorist attack may
> became a treasured family keepsake that will preserve precious memories for
> years to come.* ** *That closet door in your bedroom leads to the gates of
> Hell. Don't go there.* ** *The middle of a terrorist attack is not an
> appropriate time to catch up on your reading or paperwork.* ** *If you see
> colors in the sky, grasp your throat and pretend to choke yourself. Girls go
> for that.* ** *If your intended destination is suddenly vaporized, consider
> pulling over and watching the cool light show.* ** *If the weather is
> overcast with dark skies, look for worms in the grass.* ** *After all life
> is gone, modern appliances will continue to run forever. Think about it.* **
> *Your telephone may be a practicing physician. Look for a phone with no
> numbers on it.*  *"Wash your hands" of traditional long distance telephone
> providers.* *
> * *
> * *
> * *
> * ** *In time of war, real Americans eat red meat only! No wimpy fish or
> poultry, please.* ** *There is a reason you failed chemistry**.* ** *Watch
> out for people who come out of white tents and try to steal the shirt off
> your back.*  *If you are trapped with no hope of being found, amuse yourself
> in your final moments with shadow puppets.* ** *Radioactive materials come
> in 4 convenient sizes:
>    - individual dose
>    - family value size
>    - neighborhood spray pump size
>    - supersize!* *
> * *
> * ** *When the looting begins remember to consider the weight/value ratio.
> Here we have a few examples of high value, low effort.*
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
>
> http://www.safenow.org/
>
> __._,_.___
>
>  Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
> Change settings via the
> Web(Yahoo!
> ID required)
> Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily
> Digest|
> Switch
> to Fully 
> Featured
>  Visit Your Group
> |
> Yahoo!
> Groups Terms of Use  | Unsubscribe
> 
>
> __,_._,___
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Cash for Clunkers...

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Good idea/bad idea?

I think I'll wait till it backlashes to get a *real* deal on a car!


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Who May Harm Whom?

[Mrs. Rabbit]

"That Americans have joyfully given up self-ownership is both tragic
and sad."

So true, so very true!!!  Maybe it's just me, but it seems people are
not responsible for their own behavior, it's always someone else's
fault ! ;)

Too much government is NOT a good thing.






On Aug 5, 1:31 pm, MJ  wrote:
> Who May Harm Whom?Walter E. Williams
> Wednesday, August 05, 2009
> "No one has a right to harm another." Just a little thought, along with a few 
> examples, would demonstrate that blanket statement as pure nonsense. Suppose 
> there is a beautiful lady that both Jim and Bob are pursuing. If Jim wins her 
> hand, Bob is harmed. By the same token, if Bob wins her hand, Jim is harmed. 
> Whose harm is more important and should the beautiful lady be permitted to 
> harm either Bob or Jim are nonsense questions.
> During the 1970s, when Hewlett-Packard and Texas Instruments came out with 
> scientific calculators, great harm was suffered by slide rule manufacturers 
> such as Keuffel & Esser, and Pickett. Slide rulers have since gone the way of 
> the dodo but the question is: Should Hewlett-Packard and Texas Instruments 
> have been permitted to inflict such grievous harm on slide rule 
> manufacturers? In 1927, General Electric successfully began marketing the 
> refrigerator. The ice industry, a major industry and the livelihoods of 
> thousands of workers, was destroyed virtually overnight. Should such harm 
> have been permitted and what should Congress have done to save jobs in the 
> slide rule and ice industries?
> The first thing we should acknowledge is that we live in a world of harms. 
> Harm is reciprocal. For example, if the government stopped Hewlett-Packard 
> and Texas Instruments from harming Keuffel & Esser and Pickett, or stopped 
> General Electric from harming ice producers, by denying them the right to 
> manufacture calculators and refrigerators, they would have been harmed, plus 
> the billions of consumers who benefited from calculators and refrigerators. 
> There is no scientific or intelligent way to determine which person's harm is 
> more important than the other. That means things are more complicated than 
> saying that one person has no rights to harm another. We must ask which harms 
> are to be permitted in a free society and are not to be permitted. For 
> example, it's generally deemed acceptable for me to harm you by momentarily 
> disturbing your peace and quiet by driving a motorcycle past your house. It's 
> deemed unacceptable for me to harm you by tossing a brick through your window.
> In a free society, many conflicting harms are settled through the institution 
> of private property rights. Private property rights have to do with rights 
> belonging to the person deemed owner of property to keep, acquire, use and 
> dispose of property as he deems fit so long as he does not violate similar 
> rights of another. Let's say that you are offended, possibly harmed, by bars 
> that play vulgar rap music and permit smoking. If you could use government to 
> outlaw rap music and smoking in bars, you would be benefited and people who 
> enjoyed rap music and smoking would be harmed. Again, there is no scientific 
> or intelligent way to determine whose harm is more important. In a free 
> society, the question of who has the right to harm whom, by permitting rap 
> music and smoking, is answered by the property rights question: Who owns the 
> bar? In a socialistic society, such conflicting harms are resolved through 
> government intimidation and coercion.
> What about the right to harm oneself, such as the potential harm that can 
> come from not wearing a seatbelt. That, too, is a property rights question. 
> If you own yourself, you have the right to take chances with your own life. 
> Some might argue that if you're not wearing a seatbelt and wind up a 
> vegetable, society has to take care of you; therefore, the fascist threat 
> "click it or ticket." Becoming a burden on society is not a problem of 
> liberty and private property. It's a problem of socialism where one person is 
> forced to take care of someone else. That being the case, the government, in 
> the name of reducing health care costs, assumes part ownership of you and as 
> such assumes a right to control many aspects of your life. That Americans 
> have joyfully given up self-ownership is both tragic and 
> sad.http://townhall.com/columnists/WalterEWilliams/2009/08/05/who_may_harm_whom
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Six months of the Obama administration

[Mrs. Rabbit]

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14483

I found it here Travis.  It's nice when people add links to their
sources.


LMAO, "Change you can believe in".more of the same if you ask me!

But then again, did I *really* believe either of my choices would
bring the change that we needNOT!

Thanks for the cool post Lone Wolf!







On Aug 6, 2:59 am, Travis  wrote:
> Anyone know where this came from or who the author is?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 4:10 PM, "Lone Wolf"  wrote:
>
> > Six months of the Obama administration
> > 21 July 2009
>
> > Six months ago yesterday, Barack Obama was inaugurated as the 44th
> > president of the United States.
>
> > The election of Obama represented a popular repudiation of the Bush
> > administration and its domestic and foreign policies. The principal
> > slogan of Obama—“change you can believe in”—struck a chord with a
> > population fed up with eight years of war and single-minded focus on
> > the interests of the corporate elite.
>
> > Obama’s persona and individual history symbolized, for broad sections
> > of the working class and youth, this desire for change. The fact that
> > Obama would be the first African-American president was seen by many
> > as reason to believe he would instinctively sympathize with the poor
> > and oppressed. In any case, it was thought, he would be very different
> > from what had come before.
>
> > What evaluation can be made in light of six months’ experience? The
> > facts speak for themselves. On every critical issue, Obama—presiding
> > over substantial Democratic majorities in both houses of Congress—has
> > continued the basic policy of his predecessor.
>
> > Military policy
> > The direction of the administration on military policy was signaled
> > early on. On January 23, three days after his inauguration, Obama
> > ordered missile strikes by unmanned Predator drones on a location
> > inside Pakistan, killing 18 people. With this initial blood on his
> > hands, Obama proceeded apace.
>
> > The war in Afghanistan is now definitively “Obama’s war.” Under his
> > watch, the US has set in motion a doubling of its forces, from 32,000
> > to 68,000, and is presently carrying out a major operation to wipe out
> > popular opposition in the south. At least 30 US soldiers and 25 NATO
> > troops have died so far this month, making July the deadliest month to
> > date for occupation forces.
>
> > With Obama, however, the operation has become the “AfPak” war. US
> > missile strikes within Pakistan, often killing dozens of Pakistani
> > civilians, have become a regular occurrence. The administration has
> > pressured Pakistan to carry out its own offensive in its northwestern
> > territories, resulting in hundreds of thousands of refugees and
> > massive causalities.
>
> > The occupation of Iraq continues. The drawback of US forces from the
> > cities does not herald an end to US military involvement in the
> > country. Some 130,000 troops remain in what amounts to permanent
> > military bases outside the cities, and the administration has begun
> > the process of relabeling troops as “advisors.” In the event that the
> > fragile political situation breaks down, the US military will
> > intervene with full force.
>
> > Economic and social policy
> > On domestic policy, Obama’s overriding concern has been to defend the
> > wealth of the most powerful sections of the corporate and financial
> > elite. Through cash injections, subsidies and loan programs, trillions
> > have been handed out to the banks and financial institutions, with no
> > strings attached. The administration has opposed any real constraints
> > on executive pay or bonuses.
>
> > Utilizing the government handouts, the largest banks reported massive
> > profits in the second quarter of 2009, including $3.44 billion for
> > Goldman Sachs and $2.7 billion for JPMorgan Chase. The banks plan on
> > handing out record bonuses this year to their executives and traders.
>
> > The very institutions that precipitated the economic crisis through
> > their speculation and looting operations are doing better than ever.
> > This is not an accident. It is the intended outcome of the policy
> > carried out by the Obama administration.
>
> > Many auto workers looked to Obama for positive change. Instead, the
> > administration has forced through massive cuts in wages and benefits,
> > along with the destruction of tens of thousands of jobs. Obama has
> > shepherded General Motors and Chrysler through bankruptcy court, where
> > the two companies left billions in unwanted liabilities behind,
> > including health care obligations to tens of thousands of retirees.
>
> > The administration is carrying out a similar policy in relation to
> > state and local governments, refusing to give them the type of loans
> > made available to the banks. The largest state in the country,
> > California, is on the verge of economic meltdown, and the state
> > government is seizing on 

Re: Travis, is there any way you and alter ego Dick can STOP spamming the board????

[Mrs. Rabbit]

LOL Travis,

Ignore these loons for trying to censor you!  Kudos to you for
sticking your ground with a cool response!

I read over the rules to make sure things have not change since I
returned as a member to this board.  I would just ignore the whiners
and post away!  Even though I may not reply to many post these days, I
do enjoy reading when I can.  If I find something that interest me, I
usually highlight the little star beside the thread to ease the search
when I do have time to read the boards.

Maybe some need to comply with the home page suggestion of bringing
their sense of humor along??  hehehe


Just saying...



On Aug 6, 3:15 am, Travis  wrote:
> I have no idea what you mean post with out the first pargraphs.  I am not a
> puter geek and do well to clean up the unnecessaary garbage off the items I
> post.
> I get articls all day and night and merely select what i think is the best
> to post to the grou(s).
>
> I do not know how to combine them all into a single post except by hand
> copying the intro and link and I am not taking that much time for any
> reason.
>
> So if the moderators want me to limit the number of my posts, I will do
> that.  To one single cartoon each day and nothing else.
>
> So until I get some sort of word from the moderators of all three groups, I
> am not posting any of the delightful toons or current topic articles.
>
> I will drop posting to any of the groups if asked.
>
> This note is sent to all three groups.
>
> Travis
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:56 PM, RICHARD BROWN
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > He is NOT unintelligent by the by.  Koreans eat dogs and Chinese eat
> > cats and almost everything else, but that does not reflect on their
> > intelligence.  Many groups eat animals, but they are still intelligent
> > even if misguided nutritionally.
> > How about it Travis?  Could you post all of the links with or without
> > the first paragraph or two?
> > Richard
>
> > On Aug 5, 12:49 pm, studio  wrote:
> > > On Aug 3, 8:52 pm, Zebnick  wrote:
>
> > > > If we say please? You already post all this stuff on the other board.
> > > > Do you HAVE TO do it here too?
>
> > > He doesn't understand netiquette, nor does he want to.
> > > I mean come on, he eats possums for cryin' out loud.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Afghanistan at night...

[Mrs. Rabbit]

It worked for me d.b.  The stars are amazing...thanks for sharing!




On Jul 23, 12:10 pm, Philobealo  wrote:
> you need to fix your link
>
> On Jul 23, 9:50 am, "d.b.baker"  wrote:
>
>
>
> > Photo essay by Mil-blogger Michael Yon. I was taken by the late skies,
> > the billion stars that blanket the Afghan 
> > night:http://www.michaelyon-online.com/some-photos-and-captions.htm- Hide 
> > quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Why Should The Poor Have Voting Parity With The Rich?

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Most Stay at home Mom's I know, do a lot of shopping(taxes).  But
without the monthly government welfare check.  :o)  Oh, don't forget
that hubby is paying taxes.  He has to be doing pretty well to support
a family on a single income, which he will be taxed by the IRS.  How
does the welfare mom or hubby contribute anything at all to the
system?  Oh that's right, they don't, they just take.

It's kinda like lice.  It's not a sin (or should be consider shameful)
to get it, but to allow it to continue should be.

Not all stay at home mom's stay home because they are lazy.  The women
I know stay home to home school their kids.  It is a sacrifice to some
to give up a career (which they did pay taxes)to be a Stay at home
Mom.  I deal with welfare mom's a great deal and I'm hear to tell you,
some have made a career of being on welfare.  It's crazy that they do
not understand how this will effect their children.  Some only live
for the day and not plan for the future. Sad isn't it?

Regardless of welfare or not, each and every Amercian citizen should
have a right to vote, poor, rich or somewhere in between.





On Jul 22, 9:08 pm, Mark  wrote:
> And just what does the "housewife" put (in real money) into the nations
> pocketbook ?? nothing...the same amount as the welfare mom
>
> read more »
>
> they both "take" just from different sources.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 7:03 PM, rigsy03  wrote:
>
> > One gives and one takes.
>
> > On Jul 22, 7:49 pm, Mark  wrote:
> > > I forgot nothing. You must have missed the phrase "contribute financially
> > to
> > > the nations pocketbook" contained in my post.
>
> > > As to a link to female family members I may have the above phrase still
> > > counts. there is indeed similarity to a "housewife" and a "welfare mom"
> > as
> > > far as the above phrase is concerned.
>
> > > If there is a difference in that narrow definition please be so kind as
> > to
> > > explain it to me.
>
> >  > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 6:20 PM, rigsy03  wrote:
>
> > > > You are forgetting about men or women who inherit their wealth and
> > > > property and therefore are taxpayers unless you are against
> > > > inheritance, life insurance, wills and trusts, family businesses, etc.
> > > > Motherhood/wifedom are not voluntary- they are the roles most women
> > > > take on as part of their sexual identity. I realize the role of wife
> > > > and mother have been terribly degraded in the years following women's
> > > > liberation but I'm sure your mother, wife and daughter will understand
> > > > your linking them to women "on the dole". I'll try that phrase at the
> > > > next tea party/luncheon and see where it goes. Don't show up if you
> > > > value your hide.
>
> > > > On Jul 22, 1:12 pm, Mark  wrote:
> > > > > YES, but I think Holly's point that the housewife VOLUNTEERS to NOT
> > > > > contribute financially to the nations pocketbook. As a matter of fact
> > she
> > > > > actually COSTS by filing jointly with her taxpaying husband.
>
> > > > > Regardless of her intrinsic value in keeping house, raising kids,
> > keeping
> > > > > the wage earning, tax paying man in her life laid and fed  she
> > > > neither
> > > > > earns or pays and does so voluntarily... the SAME as the welfare
> > > > recieving
> > > > > woman, who may or may not be "on the dole" through some fault of her
> > > > own...
> > > > > trhere are actually people in this position that are not there
> > > > > voluntarily... as opposed to a housewife who is..
>
> > > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Sage2 
> > wrote:
>
> > > > > > Holly,
>
> > > > > > Contributing financially INCLUDES paying taxes !!
>
> > 
>
> > > > > > On Jul 22, 11:28 am, Hollywood 
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > perp,
>
> > > > > > > Thought we were only talking about contributing financially to
> > > > > > > society.
>
> > > > > > > On Jul 22, 10:19 am, Perplexed 
> > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > You miss the point entirely. Raising children in a stable
> > > > household
> > > > > > > > that pays taxes positively contributes to society. You seem to
> > > > think
> > > > > > > > it's no different than a welfare sloth who lives their entire
> > life
> > > > > > > > without a job and births multiple illegitimate kids at the
> > expense
> > > > of
> > > > > > > > others. I clearly distinguished between the two.
>
> > > > > > > > On Jul 20, 11:29 pm, Hollywood 
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > Perp,
>
> > > > > > > > > Why yes, if you are a full time stay-at-home-mom by
> > difinition
> > > > you
> > > > > > > > > would not have a paying job. Isn't that what I said?
>
> > > > > > > > > On Jul 20, 9:01 pm, Perplexed 
> > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > And don't forget the stay-at-home-
> > > > > > > > > > mom.
> > > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > > Millions of "stay at home moms" have multiple kids from
> > > > multiple
> > > > > > > > > > fathers and live in subsidized housing and do

Re: Why Should The Poor Have Voting Parity With The Rich?

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Which level of income do you suppose excerises their right to vote the
most?



On Jul 20, 11:07 am, Hollywood  wrote:
> Mrs. Rabbit,
>
> We are "ruled" by those who most effectively participate in our
> political process.
>
> On Jul 20, 9:55 am, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
>
>
> > Regardless of income, all citizens of age should be allowed to vote,
> > but sadly, a lot of people do not exercise their right as it is.
>
> > In your mind, is the US ruled by the poor or middle class?
>
> > On Jul 20, 10:15 am, Hollywood  wrote:
>
> > > On another forum a certain conservative poster who goes by the nic of
> > > The Supreme Turtle pretty much openly posed that question. I quote his
> > > words" "if you pay 100k in taxes you should have ten times the votes
> > > of someone who pays 10K" End quote.
>
> > > Well , I made my feelings about such a statement pretty clear but am
> > > most curious about what posters here think of that. Fire away folks,
> > > what do you think?
> > > Should the U.S. be ruled by the rich?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Why Should The Poor Have Voting Parity With The Rich?

[Mrs. Rabbit]

http://americanhistory.about.com/od/civilwarmenu/a/cause_civil_war.htm



On Jul 20, 11:09 am, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
> State's rights was the MAIN reason for the Civil War.
>
> On Jul 20, 10:59 am, THE ANNOINTED ONE  wrote:
>
>
>
> > Wasn't the base (real) reason for Mr. Lincolns war the amount of
> > unfair taxation placed on a particular segment of society ?? (For
> > those that are lacking in history the "southern" ports were taxed at a
> > rate MUCH higher than the "northern" ports)
>
> > On Jul 20, 8:15 am, Hollywood  wrote:
>
> > > On another forum a certain conservative poster who goes by the nic of
> > > The Supreme Turtle pretty much openly posed that question. I quote his
> > > words" "if you pay 100k in taxes you should have ten times the votes
> > > of someone who pays 10K" End quote.
>
> > > Well , I made my feelings about such a statement pretty clear but am
> > > most curious about what posters here think of that. Fire away folks,
> > > what do you think?
> > > Should the U.S. be ruled by the rich?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Why Should The Poor Have Voting Parity With The Rich?

[Mrs. Rabbit]

State's rights was the MAIN reason for the Civil War.


On Jul 20, 10:59 am, THE ANNOINTED ONE  wrote:
> Wasn't the base (real) reason for Mr. Lincolns war the amount of
> unfair taxation placed on a particular segment of society ?? (For
> those that are lacking in history the "southern" ports were taxed at a
> rate MUCH higher than the "northern" ports)
>
> On Jul 20, 8:15 am, Hollywood  wrote:
>
>
>
> > On another forum a certain conservative poster who goes by the nic of
> > The Supreme Turtle pretty much openly posed that question. I quote his
> > words" "if you pay 100k in taxes you should have ten times the votes
> > of someone who pays 10K" End quote.
>
> > Well , I made my feelings about such a statement pretty clear but am
> > most curious about what posters here think of that. Fire away folks,
> > what do you think?
> > Should the U.S. be ruled by the rich?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: The Priest and The Vodka

[Mrs. Rabbit]

:o)


A mother was preparing pancakes for her sons, Kevin 5, and Ryan 3.
The boys began to argue over who would get the first pancake.
Their mother saw the opportunity for a moral lesson.
'If Jesus were sitting here, He would say,
'Let my brother have the first pancake, I can wait.'
Kevin turned to his younger brother and said,
' Ryan , you be Jesus !'




On Jul 20, 1:00 am, Frederick The Moderate
 wrote:
> A new priest at his first mass was so nervous he could hardly speak.
> After mass he asked the monsignor how he had done.
>
> The monsignor replied, 'When I am worried about getting nervous on the
> pulpit, I put a glass of vodka next to the water glass. If I start to
> get nervous, I take a sip.'
>
> So next Sunday he took the monsignor's advice. At the beginning of the
> sermon, he got nervous and took a drink. He proceeded to talk up a
> storm..
>
> Upon his return to his office after the mass, he found the following
> note on the door:
>
> 1)   Sip the vodka, don't gulp.
> 2)  There are 10 commandments, not 12..
> 3)  There are 12 disciples, not 10.
> 4)  Jesus was consecrated, not constipated.
> 5)  Jacob wagered his donkey, he did not bet his ass.
> 6)  We do not refer to Jesus Christ as the late J.C.
> 7)  The Father, Son, and Holy Ghost are not referred to as Daddy,
> Junior and the spook.
> 8)  David slew Goliath; he did not kick the shit out of him.
> 9)  When David was hit by a rock and was knocked off his donkey, don't
> say he was stoned off his ass.
> 10) We do not refer to the cross as the 'Big T.'
> 11) When Jesus broke the bread at the last supper he said, 'Take this
> and eat it for this is my body.' He did not say 'Eat Me'.
> 12) The Virgin Mary is not called 'Mary with the Cherry'.
> 13) The recommended grace before a meal is not: Rub-A-Dub-Dub thanks
> for the grub, Yeah God.
> 14) Next Sunday there will be a taffy pulling contest at St.
> Peter's not a peter pulling contest at St. Taffy's.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Why Should The Poor Have Voting Parity With The Rich?

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Regardless of income, all citizens of age should be allowed to vote,
but sadly, a lot of people do not exercise their right as it is.

In your mind, is the US ruled by the poor or middle class?



On Jul 20, 10:15 am, Hollywood  wrote:
> On another forum a certain conservative poster who goes by the nic of
> The Supreme Turtle pretty much openly posed that question. I quote his
> words" "if you pay 100k in taxes you should have ten times the votes
> of someone who pays 10K" End quote.
>
> Well , I made my feelings about such a statement pretty clear but am
> most curious about what posters here think of that. Fire away folks,
> what do you think?
> Should the U.S. be ruled by the rich?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

For Sarge, my favorite Marine!

[Mrs. Rabbit]

The train was quite crowded, and a U. S. Marine walked the entire
length looking for a seat, but the only seat left was taken by a well
dressed, middle-aged, French woman's poodle.

The war-weary Marine asked, 'Ma'am, may I have that seat?' The French
woman just sniffed and said to no one in particular 'Americans are so
rude. My little Fifi is using that seat.'

The Marine walked the entire train again, but the only seat left was
under that dog.

'Please, ma'am. May I sit down? I'm very tired.'

She snorted, 'Not only are you Americans rude, you are also arrogant!'

This time the Marine didn't say a word; he just picked up the little
dog, tossed it out the train window, and sat down.

The woman shrieked, 'Someone must defend my honor! This American
should be put in his place!'

An English gentleman sitting nearby spoke up, 'Sir, you Americans seem
to have a penchant for doing the wrong thing. You hold the fork in the
wrong hand. You drive your cars on the wrong side of the road. And
now, sir, you seem to have thrown the wrong bitch out the window.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Be interesting to see which countries are recommended to this guy as being freer than the one where he is

[Mrs. Rabbit]

.


On Jun 29, 1:40 pm, RICHARD BROWN 
wrote:
> Costa Rica?  With a welfare state the equal of Scandinavian
> countries?  With the fourth highest inflation rate in Latin America?
> With government monopolies of the telecommunications, power, banks and
> insurance industries?  You are joking, yes?
>
> On Jun 29, 10:28 am, RichardForbes 
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Costa Rica
>
> > On Jun 27, 11:26 pm, dick thompson  wrote:
>
> > > ++
> > > | Emigrating To a Freer Country?                                     |
> > > |   from the all-my-recommendations-require-time-machines dept.      |
> > > |   posted by Soulskill on Saturday June 27, @00:09 (Privacy)        |
> > > |  http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/06/27/0152216        |
> > > ++
>
> > > puroresu writes "I currently reside in the UK. In recent years I've seen
> > > [0]privacy, free expression and [1]civil liberties steadily eroded, and I
> > > can't see anything changing for the better any time soon. With people
> > > being [2]banned from the UK for expressing (admittedly reprehensible)
> > > opinions, the continuing efforts to implement [3]mandatory ID cards and
> > > the prospect of a Conservative government in the near future, I'm
> > > seriously considering emigrating to a less restrictive country. Which
> > > countries would you recommend in terms of freedom and privacy? Distance
> > > is not an issue, though a reasonable level of stability and provision of
> > > public services would be a bonus."
>
> > > Discuss this story at:
> > >    http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=09/06/27/0152216
>
> > > Links:
> > >     
> > > 0.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulation_of_Investigatory_Powers_Act_2000
> > >     
> > > 1.http://www.liberty-human-rights.org.uk/issues/6-free-speech/s44-terro...
> > >     2.http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8033060.stm
> > >     3.http://www.no2id.co.uk/- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Bush's Wiretap of Americans: Conservatives?

[Mrs. Rabbit]

btw, my position will always be me and mine first and foremostit's
the mama in me, can't help it.

:o)



On Jun 29, 12:37 pm, Hollywood  wrote:
> Mrs, Rabbit,
>
> Once again, your position is  only  you and your life to be important,
> that principles and legal prededents are not. OK, if that's the way
> you want to play it.
>  Methinks you are pretending to be a lot more dull-witted than you
> actually are.
>
> On Jun 29, 11:15 am, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
>
>
> > OMG Hollywood, here we go chasing tails again.sigh.
>
> > Regardless of what you *hear* or read, as Dick mentioned, they have
> > and will continue to do these acts.  Not that Obama will admit it, but
> > he stays up late at night reading your postyeah, he's on to you.
> > Better get a wireless cards, but then again, they have GPSoh well,
> > looks like your screwed!  j/k
>
> > I understand your point Hollywood, really I do.  But I do not do
> > anything that would warrant me to live such a secrect life.  Like I
> > said, if Obama, yo mama, Bush or even Rush the band wanted to listen
> > to each and every phone call in and out of here, then so be it.  I
> > have nothing to hide, so there is no reason to *protect family
> > members* from ease dropping.  Besides, we only pay for the USE of the
> > lines/airwavesthey do not belong to us, we rent them.  Mama always
> > said to never say anything you would be ashamed of or regret and if
> > any member of my family is using MY service to break the law, then
> > they need to be caught, period.  What do you think Obama would do with
> > the information about my kids latest boyfriend saga?  Or my Dads
> > latest lawn report?  Zip, nodda dang thang!
>
> > Ok, I've humored you, feel better now?  :D
>
> > On Jun 29, 11:13 am, Hollywood  wrote:
>
> > > Mrs. Rabbit,
>
> > > Ok, you asked for it.
>
> > > YOU have nothing to hide? So, your personal little life is the only
> > > consideration here? The Constituion and Bill of Rights is not
> > > important? You don't believe in a basic right of privacy.? All the
> > > govt. has to do is mutter, "well, it's for your own good" and you will
> > > go down on bended knee and submit to anything you're told to submit
> > > to?
> > > Yes, THEY tell you that they are only listening for hints of terrorist
> > > and/or criminal activity. But just who is it that gets to define just
> > > what a "suspected terrorist or criminal is"? How are you going to stop
> > > the govt. from using ANY information they might aquire with such
> > > "taps", in ANY matter they choose?
> > > A "suspected terrorist" is anyone the govt. says is one. You would
> > > hand the govt. the tools to supress any one they want to?
>
> > > "He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy
> > > from oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a
> > > precedent that will reach to himself."   THOMAS PAINE
>
> > > On Jun 28, 11:21 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
> > > > I am not opposed to wire tapping, period.  I have nothing to hide and
> > > > if they want to listen to my father complain about his aches and pains
> > > > or my teens latest boyfriens news or me getting Grandma's recipe, then
> > > > so be it.  If it helps keep me and mine safe, then why would I oppose
> > > > it?
>
> > > > On Jun 29, 12:06 am, Hollywood  wrote:
>
> > > > > Mrs. Rabbit,
>
> > > > > Are you serious? You sure that's the tactic you want to take? MUST I
> > > > > take the time to refute such an obviously flawed arguement? Think
> > > > > about it a bit more.
>
> > > > > On Jun 28, 10:53 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
> > > > > > LOL, name calling is so second grade Fred!
>
> > > > > > So I take it you oppose wiretapping?  What are you afraid of?  If 
> > > > > > you
> > > > > > are doing the right thing, then what does it matter?  As many phones
> > > > > > calls made on a daily basis, there is NO way of being able to listen
> > > > > > to them all anyways.  It's the people who are sending up red flags,
> > > > > > people of interest, whom they seek and monitor.
>
> > > > > > BTW, which branch of the military were you in?
>
> > > > > > On Jun 28, 11:35 pm, Frederi

Marine Recruit Depot To Get New Mascot

[Mrs. Rabbit]

CASTROVILLE, Texas -- An 11-week-old English bulldog from South Texas
is about to replace Cpl. Molly Marine as one of the Marine Corp's
three official bulldog mascots.

The champion-bred bulldog puppy from Castroville doesn't yet have a
name. But she heads out next week for the Marine Corps Recruit Depot
San Diego.

After obedience training, the youngest Marine will head to boot camp.

Read more:
http://www.10news.com/news/19852517/detail.html



Bulldogs have a face only a true animal lover could adore!

If you could name the replacement, what would it be?


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Bush's Wiretap of Americans: Conservatives?

[Mrs. Rabbit]

nanana boostick your head inwell, you get the picture...:D

Seriously Holly, do you want to limit HOW we are protected??  What if
you have your way...and GOD forbid anything else happens on US
soilOBL or some other mad man/woman repeats similar acts as
9/11your family members are victims...you would cry like a stuck
pig because your family wasn't protected... whine whine whine.  Good
lord man, suck it up...

Studio will be posting his 9/11 conspiracy theories again!




On Jun 29, 12:37 pm, Hollywood  wrote:
> Mrs, Rabbit,
>
> Once again, your position is  only  you and your life to be important,
> that principles and legal prededents are not. OK, if that's the way
> you want to play it.
>  Methinks you are pretending to be a lot more dull-witted than you
> actually are.
>
> On Jun 29, 11:15 am, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
>
>
> > OMG Hollywood, here we go chasing tails again.sigh.
>
> > Regardless of what you *hear* or read, as Dick mentioned, they have
> > and will continue to do these acts.  Not that Obama will admit it, but
> > he stays up late at night reading your postyeah, he's on to you.
> > Better get a wireless cards, but then again, they have GPSoh well,
> > looks like your screwed!  j/k
>
> > I understand your point Hollywood, really I do.  But I do not do
> > anything that would warrant me to live such a secrect life.  Like I
> > said, if Obama, yo mama, Bush or even Rush the band wanted to listen
> > to each and every phone call in and out of here, then so be it.  I
> > have nothing to hide, so there is no reason to *protect family
> > members* from ease dropping.  Besides, we only pay for the USE of the
> > lines/airwavesthey do not belong to us, we rent them.  Mama always
> > said to never say anything you would be ashamed of or regret and if
> > any member of my family is using MY service to break the law, then
> > they need to be caught, period.  What do you think Obama would do with
> > the information about my kids latest boyfriend saga?  Or my Dads
> > latest lawn report?  Zip, nodda dang thang!
>
> > Ok, I've humored you, feel better now?  :D
>
> > On Jun 29, 11:13 am, Hollywood  wrote:
>
> > > Mrs. Rabbit,
>
> > > Ok, you asked for it.
>
> > > YOU have nothing to hide? So, your personal little life is the only
> > > consideration here? The Constituion and Bill of Rights is not
> > > important? You don't believe in a basic right of privacy.? All the
> > > govt. has to do is mutter, "well, it's for your own good" and you will
> > > go down on bended knee and submit to anything you're told to submit
> > > to?
> > > Yes, THEY tell you that they are only listening for hints of terrorist
> > > and/or criminal activity. But just who is it that gets to define just
> > > what a "suspected terrorist or criminal is"? How are you going to stop
> > > the govt. from using ANY information they might aquire with such
> > > "taps", in ANY matter they choose?
> > > A "suspected terrorist" is anyone the govt. says is one. You would
> > > hand the govt. the tools to supress any one they want to?
>
> > > "He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy
> > > from oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a
> > > precedent that will reach to himself."   THOMAS PAINE
>
> > > On Jun 28, 11:21 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
> > > > I am not opposed to wire tapping, period.  I have nothing to hide and
> > > > if they want to listen to my father complain about his aches and pains
> > > > or my teens latest boyfriens news or me getting Grandma's recipe, then
> > > > so be it.  If it helps keep me and mine safe, then why would I oppose
> > > > it?
>
> > > > On Jun 29, 12:06 am, Hollywood  wrote:
>
> > > > > Mrs. Rabbit,
>
> > > > > Are you serious? You sure that's the tactic you want to take? MUST I
> > > > > take the time to refute such an obviously flawed arguement? Think
> > > > > about it a bit more.
>
> > > > > On Jun 28, 10:53 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
> > > > > > LOL, name calling is so second grade Fred!
>
> > > > > > So I take it you oppose wiretapping?  What are you afraid of?  If 
> > > > > > you
> > > > > > are doing the right thing, then what does it matter?  As many phones
> > > > > > calls made on a daily bas

Re: What do you think of Islam

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Seems like one who would be so dedicated to becoming a clergy wouldn't
let a little something like NOT agreeing with principles or scripture
come between you and your calling.  Puzzling, really.  Why didn't you
cease the opportunity to correct the questionable teachings??

btw, which branch of the military did you say you were in?



Curious minds want to know.  :D



On Jun 29, 10:56 am, Frederick The Moderate
 wrote:
> On Jun 29, 5:45 am, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
> > Ok, I know I'll be sorry, but please do tell what Jesus *really*
> > thought.  :D
>
> > Seminary?  Really now?
>
> At one time, I thought about becoming a pastor. So I got my degree in
> theology (you need a Masters in Divinity to be ordained by most
> churches). The focus of my studies was ancient Hebrew & Aramaic
> customs and idioms.
>
> So what Jesus really taught? Just my opinion but there is MUCH to back
> it up. And it wasn't everything I believe, just a few points that were
> in direct contrast with most (Western) Christian churches that seem to
> ignore well, a LOT.
> 1. Jesus did not come to start a new religion. He came to open the
> Jewish belief in only one God, up to everyone else.
> 2. The Jews had forgotten God's message and turned religion into
> exactly what Travis and Richard talk about it being nowadays: a venue
> of exclusivity, arrogance and politics. Jesus' message was for the
> Jews to quit being "holier than thou", stop judging others and just do
> their best to live their own lives as spiritually as possible.
> Nowadays, this means that 99.9% of everything God creates, will be
> kept alive forever, for the purpose of crueltym because they are not
> just like "Christians". Swell. Wrong though.
> 3. Jesus did his best to make it clear: Whomever you would be quickest
> to judge (Samaritans, women, gays, Muslims etc) should be the person
> you make it your quest to learn to appreciate and if possible, even
> love. Later that came to mean Hate & Judge eveyone who isn't part of
> the Jesus Club.
> 4. Modern Christians are exactly like the Sadduccess and Pharisees
> (the good ol' folks who crucified him) of Jesus' day. Very political
> and self-righteous. Self-appointed to determine which parts of the
> Bible should be taken literally, which should be interpreted and how,
> and why you are going straight to hell if you disagree with them on
> any of this.
> 5. There is no Satan or Hell.
> 6. Revelation was just another piece of coded Apocrypha describing the
> current events of the times just after the crucifixion.
> 7. Jesus did not want this new brand of Judiasm rammed down people's
> throats but rather, growth similar to that of Buddhism - based solely
> on attraction.
>
> There is much more about Western Christian churches with which I
> dissent. I respect people right to believe as they wish so I won't try
> to tell you or anyone else that you're following the "wrong path"
> because it is simply not for me to judge. Which is another difference
> between me and traditional Christians. They want to tell others all
> about their brand of religion without ever listening with an open mind
> or respecting somenone else's.
> All that being said, The Bible and especially the teachings of Jesus
> are my spiritual guide and way.
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 29, 1:00 am, Frederick The Moderate
>
> >  wrote:
> > > I was almost banned from seminary for my radical beliefs about
> > > Christianity and what Jesus really taught. Didn't matter. By the time
> > > I got my bachelor's, I'd decided that I loved learning the origins and
> > > histories of various religions but no longer subscribed to the
> > > exclusivity most believed in.
> > > I have a poster from my (soon to be published!) book, I made which
> > > kinda parodies those types of beliefs. I'll send it to the group with
> > > the hopes it doesn't offend as many people at "The Right to bear Arms"
> > > did.
>
> > > On Jun 28, 9:49 pm, Perplexed  wrote:
>
> > > > I agree completely Richard.  I'm one of those "spiritual but not
> > > > religious" folks, closer to Buddhism than Christianity in my beliefs.
> > > > But I detest what organized religion has done to religion.
>
> > > > On Jun 28, 8:50 pm, RichardForbes 
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > I am not agnostic, but I sure am agnostic about attending church.  I
> > > > > learned the necessary lessons lon ago and have no use for being
> > > > > preached to or sold a bill of goo

Re: Bush's Wiretap of Americans: Conservatives?

[Mrs. Rabbit]

50 lashes with a wet noodle for you ole boy!  Buchana should have done
his damn jobgo back and read up on the 15 presidentno wonder
he never married!

Freeing the slaves was not Lincolns priority ya know




On Jun 29, 12:02 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE  wrote:
> Any man that would start a civil war to collect inequally applied
> taxes should not be admired. That would be Lincoln.
>
> On Jun 29, 8:01 am, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hey, lay off of Lincoln!  If the JAMES BUCHANAN  had actually done his
> > JOB, then Lincoln wouldn't have had to do it for him!
>
> > Lincoln was of pure mind and heart.
>
> > On Jun 29, 9:18 am, bruce majors  wrote:
>
> > > Obama is the biggest violator of civil liberties since Lincoln:
>
> > >http://www.facebook.com/ext/share.php?sid=94921804062&h=n9REI&u=zhKri...
>
> > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 8:19 AM, bruce majors 
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > Most constitutionalists and conservatives stopped calling themselves
> > > > Republicans about 3 or 4 years ago.
>
> > > > And Obama is now a bigger violator of civil liberties than Bush
>
> > > > On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Frederick The Moderate <
> > > > frederickshel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > >> So what do all those "Constitutionalists" Republicans and
> > > >> Conservatives think about his criminal acts in this regard?
> > > >> Or is the Constitution only important until it interferes with the GOP
> > > >> agenda?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Bush's Wiretap of Americans: Conservatives?

[Mrs. Rabbit]

OMG Hollywood, here we go chasing tails again.sigh.

Regardless of what you *hear* or read, as Dick mentioned, they have
and will continue to do these acts.  Not that Obama will admit it, but
he stays up late at night reading your postyeah, he's on to you.
Better get a wireless cards, but then again, they have GPSoh well,
looks like your screwed!  j/k

I understand your point Hollywood, really I do.  But I do not do
anything that would warrant me to live such a secrect life.  Like I
said, if Obama, yo mama, Bush or even Rush the band wanted to listen
to each and every phone call in and out of here, then so be it.  I
have nothing to hide, so there is no reason to *protect family
members* from ease dropping.  Besides, we only pay for the USE of the
lines/airwavesthey do not belong to us, we rent them.  Mama always
said to never say anything you would be ashamed of or regret and if
any member of my family is using MY service to break the law, then
they need to be caught, period.  What do you think Obama would do with
the information about my kids latest boyfriend saga?  Or my Dads
latest lawn report?  Zip, nodda dang thang!

Ok, I've humored you, feel better now?  :D



On Jun 29, 11:13 am, Hollywood  wrote:
> Mrs. Rabbit,
>
> Ok, you asked for it.
>
> YOU have nothing to hide? So, your personal little life is the only
> consideration here? The Constituion and Bill of Rights is not
> important? You don't believe in a basic right of privacy.? All the
> govt. has to do is mutter, "well, it's for your own good" and you will
> go down on bended knee and submit to anything you're told to submit
> to?
> Yes, THEY tell you that they are only listening for hints of terrorist
> and/or criminal activity. But just who is it that gets to define just
> what a "suspected terrorist or criminal is"? How are you going to stop
> the govt. from using ANY information they might aquire with such
> "taps", in ANY matter they choose?
> A "suspected terrorist" is anyone the govt. says is one. You would
> hand the govt. the tools to supress any one they want to?
>
> "He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy
> from oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a
> precedent that will reach to himself."   THOMAS PAINE
>
> On Jun 28, 11:21 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
>
>
> > I am not opposed to wire tapping, period.  I have nothing to hide and
> > if they want to listen to my father complain about his aches and pains
> > or my teens latest boyfriens news or me getting Grandma's recipe, then
> > so be it.  If it helps keep me and mine safe, then why would I oppose
> > it?
>
> > On Jun 29, 12:06 am, Hollywood  wrote:
>
> > > Mrs. Rabbit,
>
> > > Are you serious? You sure that's the tactic you want to take? MUST I
> > > take the time to refute such an obviously flawed arguement? Think
> > > about it a bit more.
>
> > > On Jun 28, 10:53 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
> > > > LOL, name calling is so second grade Fred!
>
> > > > So I take it you oppose wiretapping?  What are you afraid of?  If you
> > > > are doing the right thing, then what does it matter?  As many phones
> > > > calls made on a daily basis, there is NO way of being able to listen
> > > > to them all anyways.  It's the people who are sending up red flags,
> > > > people of interest, whom they seek and monitor.
>
> > > > BTW, which branch of the military were you in?
>
> > > > On Jun 28, 11:35 pm, Frederick The Moderate
>
> > > >  wrote:
> > > > > So what do all those "Constitutionalists" Republicans and
> > > > > Conservatives think about his criminal acts in this regard?
> > > > > Or is the Constitution only important until it interferes with the GOP
> > > > > agenda?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: What in the Constitution, Do you disagree with

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Oh my, shall we all fear the wrath of the all mighty Studio or is it
Stud-io? ;)



On Jun 29, 10:56 am, studio  wrote:
> On Jun 29, 12:11 am, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
> > OH NO, I thought I smelled trouble! ;) How are you??
>
> > I'm with you on the flag burning.  What they are burning is only a
> > replica anyways!  Like you said, it only makes a tail out of the one
> > doing the torching.
>
> Hi Mrs. Rabbit!
> I'm fine thank you.
>
> You must have smelled my .99 cent made in China plastic flag burning.
> I'm out to bring the U.S. down!
> How could the U.S. possibly survive my onslaught?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Bush's Wiretap of Americans: Conservatives?

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Hey, lay off of Lincoln!  If the JAMES BUCHANAN  had actually done his
JOB, then Lincoln wouldn't have had to do it for him!

Lincoln was of pure mind and heart.



On Jun 29, 9:18 am, bruce majors  wrote:
> Obama is the biggest violator of civil liberties since Lincoln:
>
> http://www.facebook.com/ext/share.php?sid=94921804062&h=n9REI&u=zhKri...
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 8:19 AM, bruce majors wrote:
>
>
>
> > Most constitutionalists and conservatives stopped calling themselves
> > Republicans about 3 or 4 years ago.
>
> > And Obama is now a bigger violator of civil liberties than Bush
>
> > On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Frederick The Moderate <
> > frederickshel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> So what do all those "Constitutionalists" Republicans and
> >> Conservatives think about his criminal acts in this regard?
> >> Or is the Constitution only important until it interferes with the GOP
> >> agenda?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: A truly great and important person has died

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Thanks, knowing you are in the area, I thought you would have more of
the scoop!  My teens loved Pitchmen, which I only viewed once, which
was once too much! ;)

On Jun 29, 8:49 am, Keith In Tampa  wrote:
> Hey Mrs. R!!
>
> The local television stations are really downplaying this aspect of his
> death.
>
> So many variables, but in general, I would say "No".   Supposedly, Mays was
> hit in the head by some kind of luggage that was in the overhead
> compartment.   No one is saying if this was caused by the rough landing at
> TIA or exactly how this was caused.  Moreover, there has been no
> confirmation that this was in any related to his death.
>
> There was a local radio personality on the local news last night who had
> spoken to him the night that he died.  Mays did complain of the rough
> landing, but never mentioned anything about feeling poorly, or getting hit
> in the head with a suitcase!!
>
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Mrs. Rabbit wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > I heard that on overhead compartment wasn't secure and an item fell on
> > his head.  After he got home, went to bed and never woke up.
>
> > Keith, if that's true, will the airline be at fault?
>
> > On Jun 28, 12:42 pm, Travis  wrote:
> > > FOX said he had flown in on a Southwest flight yesterday that blew a tire
> > on
> > > landing but they did not think that had anything to do with his death.
> >  How
> > > stupid a remark is that.
>
> > > On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Keith In Tampa  > >wrote:
>
> > > > Yea, I knew he lived here somewhereI actually learned that by
> > seeing a
> > > > glimpse of the show Richard mentioned."Pitchman"; which I happened
> > to
> > > > see at the airport a couple of weeks ago.
>
> > > > On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Travis  wrote:
>
> > > >> FOX NEWS actually managed to squeeze that in between their MJ shit.
> >  He
> > > >> was found dead in his home in Tampa (i think that is what they said)
> > he was
> > > >> 50.
>
> > > >> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Keith In Tampa <
> > keithinta...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > > >>> Billy Mayes died???
>
> > > >>> Naaah, say it ain't so???
>
> > > >>>   On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Travis 
> > wrote:
>
> > > >>>> From: Travis
> > > >>>> Date: Sun, Jun 28, 2009
> > > >>>> Subject: A truly great and important person has died
>
> > > >>>> In comparison to that worthless piece of pedophile garbage that fox
> > and
> > > >>>> cnn can't get enough of, infomercial star Billy Mays actually
> > provided a
> > > >>>> most useful service to all people.
>
> > > >>>> --
> > > >>>> *~@):~{>
>
> > > >>>> --
> > > >>>> *~@):~{>
>
> > > >>>> --
> > > >>>> *~@):~{>
>
> > > --
> > > *~@):~{>- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: What do you think of Islam

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Ok, I know I'll be sorry, but please do tell what Jesus *really*
thought.  :D

Seminary?  Really now?



On Jun 29, 1:00 am, Frederick The Moderate
 wrote:
> I was almost banned from seminary for my radical beliefs about
> Christianity and what Jesus really taught. Didn't matter. By the time
> I got my bachelor's, I'd decided that I loved learning the origins and
> histories of various religions but no longer subscribed to the
> exclusivity most believed in.
> I have a poster from my (soon to be published!) book, I made which
> kinda parodies those types of beliefs. I'll send it to the group with
> the hopes it doesn't offend as many people at "The Right to bear Arms"
> did.
>
> On Jun 28, 9:49 pm, Perplexed  wrote:
>
>
>
> > I agree completely Richard.  I'm one of those "spiritual but not
> > religious" folks, closer to Buddhism than Christianity in my beliefs.
> > But I detest what organized religion has done to religion.
>
> > On Jun 28, 8:50 pm, RichardForbes 
> > wrote:
>
> > > I am not agnostic, but I sure am agnostic about attending church.  I
> > > learned the necessary lessons lon ago and have no use for being
> > > preached to or sold a bill of goods.  Most religious leaders are on a
> > > level with used car salesmen and politicians.
>
> > > On Jun 28, 2:55 pm, studio  wrote:
>
> > > > On Jun 28, 12:53 am, Frederick The Moderate
>
> > > >  wrote:
> > > > > Someone posted that there is some pretty extreme prejudice and hatred
> > > > > here. True? Not True? What are your thoughts?
>
> > > > You found one of them already.
>
> > > > But to address your question;
> > > > "What do you think of Islam"?
>
> > > > I'm rather neutral in my assessment of Islam, much the way I am with
> > > > any other religion,
> > > > except when they start preaching it to me, or corner me...then I let
> > > > 'em have it.
>
> > > > I had a Muslim Arab girlfriend at one point, and a couple
> > > > acquaintances, so I know the pros and cons.
> > > > There are good people from all walks of life regardless what-where-
> > > > when-how they come
> > > > by it, I don't concentrate on the bad so much unless it actually needs
> > > > redress.
> > > > Of course there are the bad apples also, but Islam has no exclusive
> > > > rights to bad teachings.
>
> > > > Personally, I'm agnostic, but I don't make a point of preaching it.
> > > > Let sleeping dogs lay so to speak.
> > > > If someone believes in a God, fine.
> > > > But don't be laying your God in my lap...as if you could anyway.- Hide 
> > > > quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Sarah Palin At High Noon

[Mrs. Rabbit]

The only honest politician is a dead one, for dead men tell no lies!

Good morning to you too Keith!  I left you a question on one of the
Billy Mays threads, the longer one I believe.  ;)



On Jun 29, 8:34 am, Keith In Tampa  wrote:
> Good Morning Mrs. Rabbit!1
>
> Fred.Whoopsie!!  I meant Jack was going to give us some examples of
> Governor Palin's lies..I'll  wait right here, atwitter with excitement
> and anticipation for some of those examples...
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Mrs. Rabbit wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > LOL, *a measurable level of intellect and HONESTY*, that's asking a
> > bit much!
>
> > Romney couldn't be any worse than Obama, or could he?  Wonder if he
> > has given enough of his money to buy his way into heaven?  LOL!
>
> > Palin wasn't given a fair shake by the media, IMO, she really had them
> > shaking in their boots!  :o)  Given the background she has, mistakes
> > and all, I would vote for her in a skinny minute!  Palin 2012, like it
> > or not! ;)
>
> > On Jun 26, 8:11 pm, ConservativeJack 
> > wrote:
> > > I was extremely impressed with Sarah Palin when I saw her at the GOP
> > > convention. But afterward, I found her to be a prime example of why
> > > Conservatives and the GOP are getting a bad reputation. She seems to
> > > have absolutely no concern about being caught in lies, can't answer
> > > simple questions (blaming it on editing is a specious argument) and
> > > her hypocrisy sickens me. That she, Dick Cheney and Rush Limbaugh are
> > > used as examples of what Conservatism is now supposed to be, is an
> > > abomination and if allowed to continue, will inevitibly lead to the
> > > extinction of our party.
> > > It is my hope that Mitt Romney or someone with a measurable level of
> > > intellect and honesty, will come forward to lead our party.
>
> > > On Jun 26, 6:19 am, Cold Water  wrote:
>
> > > > "Why are Obama and his gang so committed and desperate to destroy
> > Palin? Could it be they recognize her destiny, like that of Moses, to set
> > her people free? And why is she so despised by them? Obama's gang hate Palin
> > for all the reasons we love her. Sheriff Palin is a good, decent and strong,
> > character-drivenconservativeleader. Palin also believes in God. Such
> > humility and virtues are as repulsive to liberals as showing Dracula the
> > cross.
>
> > > > "Something that sticks in the craw of many liberal women is that in
> > their youth, they brought into the feminist rhetoric that women's liberation
> > means no husband and family. Tragically, they find themselves aging and
> > alone. Meanwhile, thisconservativewoman has it all: great career, fine
> > family and a husband who loves and respects her. Adding insult in injury,
> > Sheriff Palin looks mighty fine in her jeans."
>
> > > > Sarah Palin At High Noon
> > > > By Lloyd Marcus
>
> > > > I just watched the classic movie "High Noon" (again). Gary Cooper
> > played a brave sheriff who brought law and order to his town. As one woman
> > said, "He made it safe for a decent woman to walk down the street". A
> > recently released outlaw was coming back to town on the noon train to
> > deliver vengeance against the sheriff who put him away. His gang of three
> > arrived early to help their leader take out the sheriff.
>
> > > > Fully aware of why the bad men were in town, the sheriff could not
> > arrest them because they had not broken any laws. Waiting is not illegal.
>
> > > > Desperate, the sheriff interrupted a church service to solicit help.
> > After much debate, the ungrateful town folks declined. They even suggested
> > the sheriff "get out of town" hoping the trouble would follow him. The
> > sheriff contemplated their recommendation. He began saddling his horse, but
> > something inside would not allow him to run away. Heroically, the sheriff
> > faced the bad guys and won!
>
> > > > I thought of another strong, gutsy, bold, stand-on-principles hero,
> > Sarah Palin, in her own modern day version of High Noon. Sheriff Palin rode
> > into America Town on a white horse withconservativeguns blazing and saved a
> > dead McCain campaign. She brought hope to weary and batteredconservativetown
> > folks and gave them a reason to vote.
>
> > > > Outlaw Obama and his posse, the hate filled liberal media/Democrat
> > gang, came to town a gunnin' to politically eliminate Sheriff Palin. They
> > ambu

Re: Sarah Palin At High Noon

[Mrs. Rabbit]

LOL, *a measurable level of intellect and HONESTY*, that's asking a
bit much!

Romney couldn't be any worse than Obama, or could he?  Wonder if he
has given enough of his money to buy his way into heaven?  LOL!

Palin wasn't given a fair shake by the media, IMO, she really had them
shaking in their boots!  :o)  Given the background she has, mistakes
and all, I would vote for her in a skinny minute!  Palin 2012, like it
or not! ;)



On Jun 26, 8:11 pm, ConservativeJack 
wrote:
> I was extremely impressed with Sarah Palin when I saw her at the GOP
> convention. But afterward, I found her to be a prime example of why
> Conservatives and the GOP are getting a bad reputation. She seems to
> have absolutely no concern about being caught in lies, can't answer
> simple questions (blaming it on editing is a specious argument) and
> her hypocrisy sickens me. That she, Dick Cheney and Rush Limbaugh are
> used as examples of what Conservatism is now supposed to be, is an
> abomination and if allowed to continue, will inevitibly lead to the
> extinction of our party.
> It is my hope that Mitt Romney or someone with a measurable level of
> intellect and honesty, will come forward to lead our party.
>
> On Jun 26, 6:19 am, Cold Water  wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Why are Obama and his gang so committed and desperate to destroy Palin? 
> > Could it be they recognize her destiny, like that of Moses, to set her 
> > people free? And why is she so despised by them? Obama's gang hate Palin 
> > for all the reasons we love her. Sheriff Palin is a good, decent and 
> > strong, character-drivenconservativeleader. Palin also believes in God. 
> > Such humility and virtues are as repulsive to liberals as showing Dracula 
> > the cross.
>
> > "Something that sticks in the craw of many liberal women is that in their 
> > youth, they brought into the feminist rhetoric that women's liberation 
> > means no husband and family. Tragically, they find themselves aging and 
> > alone. Meanwhile, thisconservativewoman has it all: great career, fine 
> > family and a husband who loves and respects her. Adding insult in injury, 
> > Sheriff Palin looks mighty fine in her jeans."
>
> > Sarah Palin At High Noon
> > By Lloyd Marcus
>
> > I just watched the classic movie "High Noon" (again). Gary Cooper played a 
> > brave sheriff who brought law and order to his town. As one woman said, "He 
> > made it safe for a decent woman to walk down the street". A recently 
> > released outlaw was coming back to town on the noon train to deliver 
> > vengeance against the sheriff who put him away. His gang of three arrived 
> > early to help their leader take out the sheriff.
>
> > Fully aware of why the bad men were in town, the sheriff could not arrest 
> > them because they had not broken any laws. Waiting is not illegal.
>
> > Desperate, the sheriff interrupted a church service to solicit help. After 
> > much debate, the ungrateful town folks declined. They even suggested the 
> > sheriff "get out of town" hoping the trouble would follow him. The sheriff 
> > contemplated their recommendation. He began saddling his horse, but 
> > something inside would not allow him to run away. Heroically, the sheriff 
> > faced the bad guys and won!
>
> > I thought of another strong, gutsy, bold, stand-on-principles hero, Sarah 
> > Palin, in her own modern day version of High Noon. Sheriff Palin rode into 
> > America Town on a white horse withconservativeguns blazing and saved a dead 
> > McCain campaign. She brought hope to weary and batteredconservativetown 
> > folks and gave them a reason to vote.
>
> > Outlaw Obama and his posse, the hate filled liberal media/Democrat gang, 
> > came to town a gunnin' to politically eliminate Sheriff Palin. They 
> > ambushed her at Miss Katie Couric's CBS saloon. Though wounded numerous 
> > times, Sheriff Palin survived.
>
> > She bravely stood tall and rode high in the saddle while ungrateful, weak 
> > kneed Republican town folks ran for cover, hid in their homes and peeked 
> > nervously through the curtains.
>
> > Why are Obama and his gang so committed and desperate to destroy Palin? 
> > Could it be they recognize her destiny, like that of Moses, to set her 
> > people free? And why is she so despised by them? Obama's gang hate Palin 
> > for all the reasons we love her. Sheriff Palin is a good, decent and strong 
> > character drivenconservativeleader. Palin also believes in God. Such 
> > humility and virtues are as repulsive to liberals as showing Dracula the 
> > cross.
>
> > Something that sticks in the craw of many liberal women is that in their 
> > youth, they brought into the feminist rhetoric that women's liberation 
> > means no husband and family. Tragically, they find themselves aging and 
> > alone. Meanwhile, thisconservativewoman has it all: great career, fine 
> > family and a husband who loves and respects her. Adding insult in injury, 
> > Sheriff Palin looks mighty fine in her jeans.
>
> > Recently, the l

Re: Bush's Wiretap of Americans: Conservatives?

[Mrs. Rabbit]

I didn't say without cause nor warrant, did I?  Clearly you understand
the need of cooperation between the telecommunications companies and
the government to intercept international phone calls and/or e-mails
of any person suspected of being spies or terrorists.  Like I said,
keep your nose clean and you shouldn't have any worries.  It should
help you rest better at night, really!

BTW, have you met Jack?  He's new here too!  You two seem to have alot
in common! ;)





On Jun 29, 1:24 am, Frederick The Moderate
 wrote:
> So what you're opening up is the ability of a politician to wiretap
> every political adversary and their families and friends, without
> cause. No perhaps none of your friends or family would ever need
> protecting but I wouldn't want any politician to have that kind of
> power and neither did the Founding Fathers.
>
> On Jun 28, 9:21 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
>
>
> > I am not opposed to wire tapping, period.  I have nothing to hide and
> > if they want to listen to my father complain about his aches and pains
> > or my teens latest boyfriens news or me getting Grandma's recipe, then
> > so be it.  If it helps keep me and mine safe, then why would I oppose
> > it?
>
> > On Jun 29, 12:06 am, Hollywood  wrote:
>
> > > Mrs. Rabbit,
>
> > > Are you serious? You sure that's the tactic you want to take? MUST I
> > > take the time to refute such an obviously flawed arguement? Think
> > > about it a bit more.
>
> > > On Jun 28, 10:53 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
> > > > LOL, name calling is so second grade Fred!
>
> > > > So I take it you oppose wiretapping?  What are you afraid of?  If you
> > > > are doing the right thing, then what does it matter?  As many phones
> > > > calls made on a daily basis, there is NO way of being able to listen
> > > > to them all anyways.  It's the people who are sending up red flags,
> > > > people of interest, whom they seek and monitor.
>
> > > > BTW, which branch of the military were you in?
>
> > > > On Jun 28, 11:35 pm, Frederick The Moderate
>
> > > >  wrote:
> > > > > So what do all those "Constitutionalists" Republicans and
> > > > > Conservatives think about his criminal acts in this regard?
> > > > > Or is the Constitution only important until it interferes with the GOP
> > > > > agenda?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: What do you think of Islam

[Mrs. Rabbit]

YOU love the abuse, now go ahead and admit it!  Otherwise, you
wouldn't be here!

Hollywood, you are a nice guy!



On Jun 29, 12:19 am, Hollywood  wrote:
> Richard,
>
> Just trying to be helpful. I'm sure Frederick would not wish to
> accidently give offense.
>
> Jeeez, I TYRY to be a nice guy and what do it get for it? Abuse,
> that's what I get!
>
> On Jun 28, 11:15 pm, RichardForbes 
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Actually, I think I will just keep that between the two of us.  We did
> > quite well without you around.
>
> > On Jun 28, 10:14 pm, Hollywood  wrote:
>
> > > Richard,
>
> > > You better tell him what the secret code words/phrases for "dumb
> > > redneck" are so he can be careful to avoid using them.  :-)
>
> > > On Jun 28, 8:35 pm, RichardForbes 
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > Fred -
>
> > > > Let me say that if Mrs. Rabbit likes you, then you are alright by me.
> > > > I have my own way of finding out about people and I usually do it in
> > > > different ways.  I appreciated many of the points you made, though I
> > > > think you might be well advised to keep some of those "dumb redneck"
> > > > comments (you never used the words, just the code) out of your
> > > > comments.  There are many southerners on this site.  Anyhow, I
> > > > actually enjoyed the sparring and hope we can do more, though I am
> > > > perfectly fine with agreeing with you, if you are right.
>
> > > > Oh yeah, one more thing.  When you get the gumption to climb a 14er,
> > > > let this old porch sitter know and I will take you on a climb and
> > > > leave you with a picture you will never forget.  Cioa, buddy!
>
> > > > On Jun 28, 7:12 pm, Frederick The Moderate
>
> > > >  wrote:
> > > > > Thanks Hollywood, I already find them both rather amusing.
>
> > > > > On Jun 28, 12:31 pm, Hollywood  wrote:
>
> > > > > > Frederick,
>
> > > > > > BTW, see what i mean about ol' Travis? He can actually be rather
> > > > > > amusing in a crude, clownish sort of way but he's not to be taken
> > > > > > seriously.
>
> > > > > > On Jun 28, 2:07 pm, Frederick The Moderate
>
> > > > > >  wrote:
> > > > > > > Hollywood: "Where, in the post you are in theory answering did he 
> > > > > > > make
> > > > > > > fun
>
> > > > > > > > of people from Alabama? Where did he make fun of people that 
> > > > > > > > value
> > > > > > > > individual freedoms and personal responsibility"
>
> > > > > > > Richard seems inclined to tell others what they are thinking - 
> > > > > > > which
> > > > > > > is where the facist remark came from (tongue in cheek). 
> > > > > > > Obviously, I
> > > > > > > did not make fun of people from Alabama or who value liberty or
> > > > > > > freedoms. I think Richard is just you know, sensitive.  ;-)
>
> > > > > > > On Jun 28, 11:54 am, Hollywood  
> > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Richard,
>
> > > > > > > > Why don't you just point out any falsehoods or untruths in 
> > > > > > > > Frederick's
> > > > > > > > post? Where, in the post you are in theory answering did he 
> > > > > > > > make fun
> > > > > > > > of people from Alabama? Where did he make fun of people that 
> > > > > > > > value
> > > > > > > > individual freedoms and personal responsibility? Do you want to 
> > > > > > > > adress
> > > > > > > > what he actully said or do you want to blabber about what you 
> > > > > > > > THINK he
> > > > > > > > means and/or implies? Let's see a little common sense and 
> > > > > > > > rational
> > > > > > > > discourse.
>
> > > > > > > > On Jun 28, 1:16 pm, RichardForbes 
> > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > And, some can't face reality, so they lie about who they are 
> > > > > > > > > and what
> > > > > > > > > t

Re: Bush's Wiretap of Americans: Conservatives?

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Besides, agree or not, they have and will continue to do it, we just
may not be made aware of it!  ;)



On Jun 29, 12:06 am, Hollywood  wrote:
> Mrs. Rabbit,
>
> Are you serious? You sure that's the tactic you want to take? MUST I
> take the time to refute such an obviously flawed arguement? Think
> about it a bit more.
>
> On Jun 28, 10:53 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
>
>
> > LOL, name calling is so second grade Fred!
>
> > So I take it you oppose wiretapping?  What are you afraid of?  If you
> > are doing the right thing, then what does it matter?  As many phones
> > calls made on a daily basis, there is NO way of being able to listen
> > to them all anyways.  It's the people who are sending up red flags,
> > people of interest, whom they seek and monitor.
>
> > BTW, which branch of the military were you in?
>
> > On Jun 28, 11:35 pm, Frederick The Moderate
>
> >  wrote:
> > > So what do all those "Constitutionalists" Republicans and
> > > Conservatives think about his criminal acts in this regard?
> > > Or is the Constitution only important until it interferes with the GOP
> > > agenda?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Bush's Wiretap of Americans: Conservatives?

[Mrs. Rabbit]

I am not opposed to wire tapping, period.  I have nothing to hide and
if they want to listen to my father complain about his aches and pains
or my teens latest boyfriens news or me getting Grandma's recipe, then
so be it.  If it helps keep me and mine safe, then why would I oppose
it?



On Jun 29, 12:06 am, Hollywood  wrote:
> Mrs. Rabbit,
>
> Are you serious? You sure that's the tactic you want to take? MUST I
> take the time to refute such an obviously flawed arguement? Think
> about it a bit more.
>
> On Jun 28, 10:53 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
>
>
> > LOL, name calling is so second grade Fred!
>
> > So I take it you oppose wiretapping?  What are you afraid of?  If you
> > are doing the right thing, then what does it matter?  As many phones
> > calls made on a daily basis, there is NO way of being able to listen
> > to them all anyways.  It's the people who are sending up red flags,
> > people of interest, whom they seek and monitor.
>
> > BTW, which branch of the military were you in?
>
> > On Jun 28, 11:35 pm, Frederick The Moderate
>
> >  wrote:
> > > So what do all those "Constitutionalists" Republicans and
> > > Conservatives think about his criminal acts in this regard?
> > > Or is the Constitution only important until it interferes with the GOP
> > > agenda?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: What in the Constitution, Do you disagree with

[Mrs. Rabbit]

OH NO, I thought I smelled trouble! ;) How are you??

I'm with you on the flag burning.  What they are burning is only a
replica anyways!  Like you said, it only makes a tail out of the one
doing the torching.








On Jun 29, 12:01 am, studio  wrote:
> On Jun 28, 9:45 pm, Frederick The Moderate
>
>  wrote:
> > What in the Constitution do you disagree with?
>
> Off the top of my head;
> the way the original defense intent has been superseded by the
> "interest intent".
> Interests can mean anything to anyone.
>
> I also don't care very much for the way the 13 amendment is summarily
> ignored.
> But I suppose you could make arguments of how any of the articles or
> amendments
> are interpreted or ignored.
>
> > The first thing I would change is the right to burn the American Flag
> > in public. I just don't see it as a freedom of speech / expression or
> > anything else. I don't see a need to protect this particular right.
>
> Flag burning upsets you?
> Fires without permits upsets me.
> If the fire has a permit, I could care less.
> Flag burning usually just shows others what an ass you may be.
>
> If a country can't stand a few flags being burned, it doesn't deserve
> to stand at all.
>
> "I am one who desires to wash the flag, not burn it". -Norman Thomas
>
> > What would you change?
>
> The words.
> ---
> I do find it very strange that Richard Forbes believes in a living
> Constitution though.
> Most conservatives don't, even when they're the ones changing it.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Bush's Wiretap of Americans: Conservatives?

[Mrs. Rabbit]

LOL, name calling is so second grade Fred!


So I take it you oppose wiretapping?  What are you afraid of?  If you
are doing the right thing, then what does it matter?  As many phones
calls made on a daily basis, there is NO way of being able to listen
to them all anyways.  It's the people who are sending up red flags,
people of interest, whom they seek and monitor.

BTW, which branch of the military were you in?





On Jun 28, 11:35 pm, Frederick The Moderate
 wrote:
> So what do all those "Constitutionalists" Republicans and
> Conservatives think about his criminal acts in this regard?
> Or is the Constitution only important until it interferes with the GOP
> agenda?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: 2nd Amendment

[Mrs. Rabbit]

LOL, why would you ever need a tommy gun?  You seriously have me
wondering about you sometimes!  ;)  It's all good!



On Jun 28, 11:14 pm, The Supreme Turtle 
wrote:
> what is wrong with a tommy gun? If cops are issued it for self defense
> why shouldn't other civilians be able to own one?
>
> On Jun 28, 10:55 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
>
>
> > Well, you can't usually go wrong if you agree with Richard!  He's the
> > last of the good ole boys! (note to Richard, I said ole, not OLD!)
>
> > Everyone should have the right to own a gun, not a Tommygun, but a
> > shotgun or handgun.  I have no problems with concealed weapons. I
> > would much rather have mine concealed, than in plain view.  But hey,
> > that's just me!
>
> > On Jun 28, 10:24 pm, Frederick The Moderate
>
> >  wrote:
> > > Here I go agreeing with Richard again!
> > > I don't recall the Constitution saying the right to bear arms means
> > > the right to do so secretly. Why is that a right we need to protect.
> > > And then, if some Blood gets caught with a glock downtown, lock him up
> > > for 10 years!
>
> > > On Jun 28, 6:48 pm, RichardForbes 
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > I hate the gun arguments.  The conservatives act as if the
> > > > constitution bans private organizations or companies from setting
> > > > their own rules.  Hells bells, there is no reason at all that a
> > > > baseball stadium could not ban guns.   On the other hand, liberals
> > > > attempt to disguise efforts at limitation with the use of the word
> > > > registration.  Personally, I think every gun should be registered and
> > > > logged in a central database along with ballistic records.  Those
> > > > steps in no way infringe on the freedom to own a gun and they assist
> > > > the authorities in catching criminals who use guns in their crimes.
> > > > Call me crazy, but I think both sides are wrong.
>
> > > > On Jun 28, 7:10 pm, Frederick The Moderate
>
> > > >  wrote:
> > > > > I like owning a gun. I don't think people should be able to take Uzi's
> > > > > to baseball games or nightclubs. I could say that you have been
> > > > > "brainwashed" by right wing extremists who seem to deny the fact that
> > > > > the Constitution has evolved over time but unlike those on the extreme
> > > > > right, I don't have to insult or demean everyone who disagrees with
> > > > > me. So I'll just assume that like me, you formed your opinion based on
> > > > > personal insights and experiences.
> > > > > Me? I've been stabbed once and shot twice by gang-bangers in high
> > > > > school. So what is the solution? Arm all the kids in high school? How
> > > > > about my friend who was shot in a bar? Arm all the drunks?
> > > > > When the Constitution was written, there was no such thing as a police
> > > > > force in America. We'd just fended off the British. Guns were needed
> > > > > for food every bit as much for protection. "Wild savages" were killing
> > > > > settlers all over the place.
> > > > > Now, for every crime stopped with a gun, over 10,000 are committed
> > > > > with one.
> > > > > So while I respect your opinion, I simply disagree with it. This has
> > > > > nothing to do with liberal left-wing brainwashing or whatever other
> > > > > crap you care to hurl in my direction. It is just my opinion.
>
> > > > > On Jun 28, 1:43 pm, Keith In Tampa  wrote:
>
> > > > > > Fred,
>
> > > > > > I am not sure where you are going with this, and I read your 
> > > > > > message in
> > > > > > another post; something to the effect that the government should 
> > > > > > restrict
> > > > > > folks from bringing firearms (I think you referenced a bazooka) to a
> > > > > > baseball game.Or something or other.
>
> > > > > > You have literally been brainwashed by far left extremists who 
> > > > > > don't like
> > > > > > our Constitution, especially the Clause that allows for Americans 
> > > > > > to defend
> > > > > > themselves.  The Second Amendment has worked just fine throughout 
> > > > > > our
> > > > > > History, and has proven to be one of th

Re: New to This Group

[Mrs. Rabbit]

LMAO!

:o)

On Jun 28, 10:57 pm, Perplexed  wrote:
> Gee, judgmentalism from a
> Republican nowadays? How surprising
> 
>
> The past five elections I've voted for Clinton twice, Gore, Kerry, and
> McCain.
>
> What kind of judgmental moron would think that means I'm a
> republican?  Oh yeah...a liberal pretending to be a new moderate
> poster.
>
> On Jun 28, 1:11 am, Frederick The Moderate
>
>
>
>  wrote:
> > So how's that whole "Party of exclusion" thing workin for ya? Oh yeah
> > that's right. 60 Senate seats. Huge margin. Sorry but although I
> > disagree with much that Obama is currently up to, I don't walk the
> > line of good little GOP sheeple and buy all the bs the Ultra Righties
> > want to sell. Any more than I believe all the crap the Dems are trying
> > to sell either.
> > My choice was between Obama and the possibility of Palin - whom I bet
> > you adore. Like I said, proud of the vote. Gee, judgmentalism from a
> > Republican nowadays? How surprising
> > But as Studio said, if one doesn't agree with ALL the extremist crap
> > and bs of the extreme Right, they are invited to vote elsewhere and
> > you will label and / or attack. Wow. That Studio is really, really
> > accurate about you and RichardForbes! lol
>
> > On Jun 27, 9:57 pm, Perplexed  wrote:
>
> > > How can someone who claims to be "big on the Constitution" be happy
> > > they voted for Obama?
>
> > > He fully supported the DC and Chicago gun bans before they became an
> > > inconvenience in the campaign.
>
> > > And if you know labor unions have been out of control for decades, why
> > > are you happy about voting for a guy who is doing everything in his
> > > power to give them even more power?
>
> > > Lastly, I don't know how anyone could have listened to that POS
> > > Jeremiah Wright (knowing Obama worshiped him for 20 years) and swallow
> > > the "I never heard those things" line of BS.  And I don't know how any
> > > theologian especially would think that church was about religion and
> > > not hating and blaming whites.
>
> > > Richard is right; 99% of those who come to these boards claiming to be
> > > either independents or moderates are flaming liberals.
>
> > > On Jun 27, 11:50 am, Frederick The Moderate
>
> > >  wrote:
> > > > Hi Everyone:
>
> > > > Just thought I'd introduce myself. My first presidential vote was for
> > > > Reagan and my most recent was for Obama. I'm proud of both of those
> > > > votes. I am a Christian family man, business owner and former military
> > > > (Office of Naval Intelligence). My degree is in Theology. So if it
> > > > wasn't for the total disregard of the Constitution by Bush / Cheney
> > > > and the GOP's tolerance and condoning of the abandonment of all the
> > > > things Reagan stood for, I might still be a Republican. As it is, I'm
> > > > an Independent.
> > > > Given the mess he inherited, I think Obama is doing okay so far. I'm
> > > > not happy about the bailouts or the deficit but I don't believe that
> > > > anyone could have avoided spending some money, to get us out of the
> > > > total disaster Bush left behind. I'm impressed by the fact that I've
> > > > seen improvements in the economy over the last few months.
> > > > I find Rush Limbaugh to epitomize everything that's wrong with my
> > > > former party. Complete hypocrite. Party before Country. The belief
> > > > that he should be able to impose morals upon others, while ignoring
> > > > them himself. What happened to the GOP I was a member of? I voted for
> > > > Bush Sr. and thought he was a pretty good president. I thought Clinton
> > > > was lucky at first but his second term convinced me he was a pretty
> > > > good president too. I didn't care about Lewinsky and don't care about
> > > > some Argentine girl either.
> > > > On the other side, I believe labor unions were out of control for
> > > > decades and led to job losses a smuch as anything else. I think it is
> > > > ridiculous that a teacher can be openly gay but not openly Christian
> > > > (I have nothing against gays, I just don't like prejudice in either
> > > > direction).
> > > > I believe in strong military DEFENSE and Intelligence but Iraq was
> > > > total BS and more importantly, UnConstitutional. I'm big on the
> > > > Constitution.
> > > > My in-laws are Persian (Iranian) and I'm both entertained and appalled
> > > > by some of the ignorance I see from Americans regarding recent
> > > > events.
> > > > I don't believe we need Affirmative Action anymore. I think NAFTA was
> > > > poorly negotiated and screws us.
> > > > I could go on but I think this lets you know a bit about me.
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Frederick- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.Po

Re: 2nd Amendment

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Well, you can't usually go wrong if you agree with Richard!  He's the
last of the good ole boys! (note to Richard, I said ole, not OLD!)

Everyone should have the right to own a gun, not a Tommygun, but a
shotgun or handgun.  I have no problems with concealed weapons. I
would much rather have mine concealed, than in plain view.  But hey,
that's just me!



On Jun 28, 10:24 pm, Frederick The Moderate
 wrote:
> Here I go agreeing with Richard again!
> I don't recall the Constitution saying the right to bear arms means
> the right to do so secretly. Why is that a right we need to protect.
> And then, if some Blood gets caught with a glock downtown, lock him up
> for 10 years!
>
> On Jun 28, 6:48 pm, RichardForbes 
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I hate the gun arguments.  The conservatives act as if the
> > constitution bans private organizations or companies from setting
> > their own rules.  Hells bells, there is no reason at all that a
> > baseball stadium could not ban guns.   On the other hand, liberals
> > attempt to disguise efforts at limitation with the use of the word
> > registration.  Personally, I think every gun should be registered and
> > logged in a central database along with ballistic records.  Those
> > steps in no way infringe on the freedom to own a gun and they assist
> > the authorities in catching criminals who use guns in their crimes.
> > Call me crazy, but I think both sides are wrong.
>
> > On Jun 28, 7:10 pm, Frederick The Moderate
>
> >  wrote:
> > > I like owning a gun. I don't think people should be able to take Uzi's
> > > to baseball games or nightclubs. I could say that you have been
> > > "brainwashed" by right wing extremists who seem to deny the fact that
> > > the Constitution has evolved over time but unlike those on the extreme
> > > right, I don't have to insult or demean everyone who disagrees with
> > > me. So I'll just assume that like me, you formed your opinion based on
> > > personal insights and experiences.
> > > Me? I've been stabbed once and shot twice by gang-bangers in high
> > > school. So what is the solution? Arm all the kids in high school? How
> > > about my friend who was shot in a bar? Arm all the drunks?
> > > When the Constitution was written, there was no such thing as a police
> > > force in America. We'd just fended off the British. Guns were needed
> > > for food every bit as much for protection. "Wild savages" were killing
> > > settlers all over the place.
> > > Now, for every crime stopped with a gun, over 10,000 are committed
> > > with one.
> > > So while I respect your opinion, I simply disagree with it. This has
> > > nothing to do with liberal left-wing brainwashing or whatever other
> > > crap you care to hurl in my direction. It is just my opinion.
>
> > > On Jun 28, 1:43 pm, Keith In Tampa  wrote:
>
> > > > Fred,
>
> > > > I am not sure where you are going with this, and I read your message in
> > > > another post; something to the effect that the government should 
> > > > restrict
> > > > folks from bringing firearms (I think you referenced a bazooka) to a
> > > > baseball game.Or something or other.
>
> > > > You have literally been brainwashed by far left extremists who don't 
> > > > like
> > > > our Constitution, especially the Clause that allows for Americans to 
> > > > defend
> > > > themselves.  The Second Amendment has worked just fine throughout our
> > > > History, and has proven to be one of the reasons that we continue to 
> > > > remain
> > > > a vibrant, free Nation-State.
>
> > > > I strongly encourage you to go and read the Federalist, as well as the
> > > > Anti-Federalist Papers, both of which supported the language contained
> > > > within the Second Amendment.
>
> > > > There were three major reasons for placing and documenting this 
> > > > unalienable
> > > > right on paper:
>
> > > > 1.  For Americans to be able to protect their homes and personal affects
> > > > from domestic threats, to include, thieves, rogues, bandits, wildlife, 
> > > > axe
> > > > murderers, etc.;
>
> > > > 2.   For Americans to deter any acts of aggression from foreign 
> > > > invaders;
> > > > but most importantly,
>
> > > > 3.   To insure that our government was kept in check.
>
> > > > This third prong is the part that folks like Chuckie Schumer, DiFi, Babs
> > > > Boxer, Maxine Waters, Bella Pelosi, and a host of other confused
> > > > socialist-elitists who have an Anti-American agenda cannot stand, and 
> > > > wish
> > > > to see done away with.
>
> > > > In other words, if the government has a tank, then I should have the 
> > > > right
> > > > to have a tank.
>
> > > > There should be no restrictions on any law abiding citizen from owning
> > > > whatever firearm he so chooses, it has nothing to do with hunting, it 
> > > > has to
> > > > do with deterrence!!
>
> > > > On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Frederick 
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > [image: Right to Bear Amrs.JPG]
>
> > > >  Right to Bear Amrs.JPG
> > > > 450KViewDownload- H

Re: New to This Group

[Mrs. Rabbit]

LOL, I have one who will graduate HS in two years!  I hope all of my
rabbits will stay home till they graduate college.  That way I can
keep a better eye on them!  I know you enjoy him being there, it's all
the other crap that gets old! :)



On Jun 28, 9:54 pm, RichardForbes 
wrote:
> My evil spawn is outliving his welcome.  It is cramping that second
> childhood my wife and I were looking forward to.
>
> Just kidding (well at least about the evil spawn part).  He is doing
> great and may yet graduate college.
>
> On Jun 28, 7:51 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
>
>
> > {{{Richard}}}  It's good to see you!  We are doing well, thanks! How
> > about you, your beautiful bride and offspring?
>
> > :o)
>
> > On Jun 28, 9:42 pm, RichardForbes 
> > wrote:
>
> > > Well, howdy Mrs. R.  How is the better half of the ever expanding
> > > Rabbit herd?
>
> > > On Jun 28, 7:38 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
> > > > LOL, Christian enough?  As for religion or lack of, to each their
> > > > own.  Each person has a choice, so be it far from me to jugde you or
> > > > any one else.  I don't have the answers, only questions myself.  So,
> > > > if you don't like what they have to say, don't respond is all I can
> > > > suggest.
>
> > > > You will find people from all walks of life on this board, but you
> > > > already know that, don't you?  ;)
>
> > > > On Jun 28, 9:20 pm, Frederick The Moderate
>
> > > >  wrote:
> > > > > Hi Rabbit!
> > > > > Lookat this! All I did was introduce myself and I've gotten over 25
> > > > > replies! Dick is sure I'm not Christian enough and shall be
> > > > > excommincated forthwith and Bruce wet his panties!
> > > > > I'm quite flattered that they think about me so much!
> > > > >  =)
>
> > > > > On Jun 28, 4:25 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
> > > > > > Welcome to the group Fred!  Your style sure looks familiar!  Have we
> > > > > > posted on the same board before?
>
> > > > > > :o)
>
> > > > > > On Jun 28, 11:45 am, Frederick The Moderate
>
> > > > > >  wrote:
> > > > > > > Ahhh, the thing about the use of the word Negro. Dude, are you 
> > > > > > > like a
> > > > > > > hundred years old and a member of the KKK or what? Nevermind.
> > > > > > > "Cry for attention"? lol, okay. Just thought i'd introduce myself 
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > the group. It's called common courtesy. Obviously a foreign 
> > > > > > > concept to
> > > > > > > you so I won't try to explain.
> > > > > > > You "Go after both of them". Well goody for you! So in other 
> > > > > > > words,
> > > > > > > you're one of those old coots on the porch who bitches about
> > > > > > > everything and does nothing about the same. How productive and
> > > > > > > positive of you! Congrats! You're both negative AND useless! 
> > > > > > > Quite an
> > > > > > > achievement.
> > > > > > > So what? You think you're impressive because you're able to point 
> > > > > > > your
> > > > > > > finger at things you don't like? That's exactly what 5th 
> > > > > > > generation
> > > > > > > welfare recipients do. "Oh this is wrong and that's wrong!". Big 
> > > > > > > deal.
> > > > > > > Call me what you like. Criticism is always easiest for those on 
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > sidelines.
>
> > > > > > > On Jun 28, 5:49 am, RichardForbes 
> > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > No, Mr. Moderate.  I actually saw the stupid Alabama comment 
> > > > > > > > you made
> > > > > > > > before I saw your cry for attention.  I happened not to vote 
> > > > > > > > for McCai
> > > > > > > > or Obama.  I have had no more negative things to say about 
> > > > > > > > Obama than
> > > > > > > > I had to say about Bush.  But, I will go after both of them

Re: New to This Group

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Which other board?



On Jun 28, 9:51 pm, Frederick The Moderate
 wrote:
> This is similar to the other board in that liberals generally seem to
> accept my conservative side but conservatives label me and attack any
> time I am not a complete party line sheeple and disagree with them on
> any issue. Typical. ;-)
>
> On Jun 28, 6:38 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
>
>
> > LOL, Christian enough?  As for religion or lack of, to each their
> > own.  Each person has a choice, so be it far from me to jugde you or
> > any one else.  I don't have the answers, only questions myself.  So,
> > if you don't like what they have to say, don't respond is all I can
> > suggest.
>
> > You will find people from all walks of life on this board, but you
> > already know that, don't you?  ;)
>
> > On Jun 28, 9:20 pm, Frederick The Moderate
>
> >  wrote:
> > > Hi Rabbit!
> > > Lookat this! All I did was introduce myself and I've gotten over 25
> > > replies! Dick is sure I'm not Christian enough and shall be
> > > excommincated forthwith and Bruce wet his panties!
> > > I'm quite flattered that they think about me so much!
> > >  =)
>
> > > On Jun 28, 4:25 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
> > > > Welcome to the group Fred!  Your style sure looks familiar!  Have we
> > > > posted on the same board before?
>
> > > > :o)
>
> > > > On Jun 28, 11:45 am, Frederick The Moderate
>
> > > >  wrote:
> > > > > Ahhh, the thing about the use of the word Negro. Dude, are you like a
> > > > > hundred years old and a member of the KKK or what? Nevermind.
> > > > > "Cry for attention"? lol, okay. Just thought i'd introduce myself to
> > > > > the group. It's called common courtesy. Obviously a foreign concept to
> > > > > you so I won't try to explain.
> > > > > You "Go after both of them". Well goody for you! So in other words,
> > > > > you're one of those old coots on the porch who bitches about
> > > > > everything and does nothing about the same. How productive and
> > > > > positive of you! Congrats! You're both negative AND useless! Quite an
> > > > > achievement.
> > > > > So what? You think you're impressive because you're able to point your
> > > > > finger at things you don't like? That's exactly what 5th generation
> > > > > welfare recipients do. "Oh this is wrong and that's wrong!". Big deal.
> > > > > Call me what you like. Criticism is always easiest for those on the
> > > > > sidelines.
>
> > > > > On Jun 28, 5:49 am, RichardForbes 
> > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > No, Mr. Moderate.  I actually saw the stupid Alabama comment you 
> > > > > > made
> > > > > > before I saw your cry for attention.  I happened not to vote for 
> > > > > > McCai
> > > > > > or Obama.  I have had no more negative things to say about Obama 
> > > > > > than
> > > > > > I had to say about Bush.  But, I will go after both of them as they
> > > > > > attempt to expand the scope of the imperial federal government and 
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > roll back my individual freedoms and liberties and to expand the
> > > > > > "social slavery" state that so many politicians desire.  Feel free 
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > let them be your "master", I have no intention of participating.
>
> > > > > > On Jun 27, 10:09 pm, Frederick The Moderate
>
> > > > > >  wrote:
> > > > > > > RichardForbes  wrote:
>
> > > > > > > "My guess is you are full of crap. you managed to hit all the 
> > > > > > > liberal
> > > > > > > talking points."
> > > > > > > You seem to prove Studio correct. Let's see what you define as
> > > > > > > "liberal":
> > > > > > > * I think people should be allowed to be as open about their 
> > > > > > > Christian
> > > > > > > faith as their sexual persuasion.
> > > > > > > * I think labor unions have abused their power and have too much 
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > it.
> >

Re: New to This Group

[Mrs. Rabbit]

{{{Richard}}}  It's good to see you!  We are doing well, thanks! How
about you, your beautiful bride and offspring?

:o)



On Jun 28, 9:42 pm, RichardForbes 
wrote:
> Well, howdy Mrs. R.  How is the better half of the ever expanding
> Rabbit herd?
>
> On Jun 28, 7:38 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
>
>
> > LOL, Christian enough?  As for religion or lack of, to each their
> > own.  Each person has a choice, so be it far from me to jugde you or
> > any one else.  I don't have the answers, only questions myself.  So,
> > if you don't like what they have to say, don't respond is all I can
> > suggest.
>
> > You will find people from all walks of life on this board, but you
> > already know that, don't you?  ;)
>
> > On Jun 28, 9:20 pm, Frederick The Moderate
>
> >  wrote:
> > > Hi Rabbit!
> > > Lookat this! All I did was introduce myself and I've gotten over 25
> > > replies! Dick is sure I'm not Christian enough and shall be
> > > excommincated forthwith and Bruce wet his panties!
> > > I'm quite flattered that they think about me so much!
> > >  =)
>
> > > On Jun 28, 4:25 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
> > > > Welcome to the group Fred!  Your style sure looks familiar!  Have we
> > > > posted on the same board before?
>
> > > > :o)
>
> > > > On Jun 28, 11:45 am, Frederick The Moderate
>
> > > >  wrote:
> > > > > Ahhh, the thing about the use of the word Negro. Dude, are you like a
> > > > > hundred years old and a member of the KKK or what? Nevermind.
> > > > > "Cry for attention"? lol, okay. Just thought i'd introduce myself to
> > > > > the group. It's called common courtesy. Obviously a foreign concept to
> > > > > you so I won't try to explain.
> > > > > You "Go after both of them". Well goody for you! So in other words,
> > > > > you're one of those old coots on the porch who bitches about
> > > > > everything and does nothing about the same. How productive and
> > > > > positive of you! Congrats! You're both negative AND useless! Quite an
> > > > > achievement.
> > > > > So what? You think you're impressive because you're able to point your
> > > > > finger at things you don't like? That's exactly what 5th generation
> > > > > welfare recipients do. "Oh this is wrong and that's wrong!". Big deal.
> > > > > Call me what you like. Criticism is always easiest for those on the
> > > > > sidelines.
>
> > > > > On Jun 28, 5:49 am, RichardForbes 
> > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > No, Mr. Moderate.  I actually saw the stupid Alabama comment you 
> > > > > > made
> > > > > > before I saw your cry for attention.  I happened not to vote for 
> > > > > > McCai
> > > > > > or Obama.  I have had no more negative things to say about Obama 
> > > > > > than
> > > > > > I had to say about Bush.  But, I will go after both of them as they
> > > > > > attempt to expand the scope of the imperial federal government and 
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > roll back my individual freedoms and liberties and to expand the
> > > > > > "social slavery" state that so many politicians desire.  Feel free 
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > let them be your "master", I have no intention of participating.
>
> > > > > > On Jun 27, 10:09 pm, Frederick The Moderate
>
> > > > > >  wrote:
> > > > > > > RichardForbes  wrote:
>
> > > > > > > "My guess is you are full of crap. you managed to hit all the 
> > > > > > > liberal
> > > > > > > talking points."
> > > > > > > You seem to prove Studio correct. Let's see what you define as
> > > > > > > "liberal":
> > > > > > > * I think people should be allowed to be as open about their 
> > > > > > > Christian
> > > > > > > faith as their sexual persuasion.
> > > > > > > * I think labor unions have abused their power and have too much 
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > it.
> > > > > > > * I'm against Affirmative Action.

Re: A truly great and important person has died

[Mrs. Rabbit]

I heard that on overhead compartment wasn't secure and an item fell on
his head.  After he got home, went to bed and never woke up.

Keith, if that's true, will the airline be at fault?



On Jun 28, 12:42 pm, Travis  wrote:
> FOX said he had flown in on a Southwest flight yesterday that blew a tire on
> landing but they did not think that had anything to do with his death.  How
> stupid a remark is that.
>
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Keith In Tampa 
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Yea, I knew he lived here somewhereI actually learned that by seeing a
> > glimpse of the show Richard mentioned."Pitchman"; which I happened to
> > see at the airport a couple of weeks ago.
>
> > On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Travis  wrote:
>
> >> FOX NEWS actually managed to squeeze that in between their MJ shit.  He
> >> was found dead in his home in Tampa (i think that is what they said) he was
> >> 50.
>
> >> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Keith In Tampa 
> >> wrote:
>
> >>> Billy Mayes died???
>
> >>> Naaah, say it ain't so???
>
> >>>   On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Travis  wrote:
>
>  From: Travis
>  Date: Sun, Jun 28, 2009
>  Subject: A truly great and important person has died
>
>  In comparison to that worthless piece of pedophile garbage that fox and
>  cnn can't get enough of, infomercial star Billy Mays actually provided a
>  most useful service to all people.
>
>  --
>  *~@):~{>
>
>  --
>  *~@):~{>
>
>  --
>  *~@):~{>
>
> --
> *~@):~{>- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: New to This Group

[Mrs. Rabbit]

LOL, Christian enough?  As for religion or lack of, to each their
own.  Each person has a choice, so be it far from me to jugde you or
any one else.  I don't have the answers, only questions myself.  So,
if you don't like what they have to say, don't respond is all I can
suggest.

You will find people from all walks of life on this board, but you
already know that, don't you?  ;)



On Jun 28, 9:20 pm, Frederick The Moderate
 wrote:
> Hi Rabbit!
> Lookat this! All I did was introduce myself and I've gotten over 25
> replies! Dick is sure I'm not Christian enough and shall be
> excommincated forthwith and Bruce wet his panties!
> I'm quite flattered that they think about me so much!
>  =)
>
> On Jun 28, 4:25 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
>
>
> > Welcome to the group Fred!  Your style sure looks familiar!  Have we
> > posted on the same board before?
>
> > :o)
>
> > On Jun 28, 11:45 am, Frederick The Moderate
>
> >  wrote:
> > > Ahhh, the thing about the use of the word Negro. Dude, are you like a
> > > hundred years old and a member of the KKK or what? Nevermind.
> > > "Cry for attention"? lol, okay. Just thought i'd introduce myself to
> > > the group. It's called common courtesy. Obviously a foreign concept to
> > > you so I won't try to explain.
> > > You "Go after both of them". Well goody for you! So in other words,
> > > you're one of those old coots on the porch who bitches about
> > > everything and does nothing about the same. How productive and
> > > positive of you! Congrats! You're both negative AND useless! Quite an
> > > achievement.
> > > So what? You think you're impressive because you're able to point your
> > > finger at things you don't like? That's exactly what 5th generation
> > > welfare recipients do. "Oh this is wrong and that's wrong!". Big deal.
> > > Call me what you like. Criticism is always easiest for those on the
> > > sidelines.
>
> > > On Jun 28, 5:49 am, RichardForbes 
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > No, Mr. Moderate.  I actually saw the stupid Alabama comment you made
> > > > before I saw your cry for attention.  I happened not to vote for McCai
> > > > or Obama.  I have had no more negative things to say about Obama than
> > > > I had to say about Bush.  But, I will go after both of them as they
> > > > attempt to expand the scope of the imperial federal government and to
> > > > roll back my individual freedoms and liberties and to expand the
> > > > "social slavery" state that so many politicians desire.  Feel free to
> > > > let them be your "master", I have no intention of participating.
>
> > > > On Jun 27, 10:09 pm, Frederick The Moderate
>
> > > >  wrote:
> > > > > RichardForbes  wrote:
>
> > > > > "My guess is you are full of crap. you managed to hit all the liberal
> > > > > talking points."
> > > > > You seem to prove Studio correct. Let's see what you define as
> > > > > "liberal":
> > > > > * I think people should be allowed to be as open about their Christian
> > > > > faith as their sexual persuasion.
> > > > > * I think labor unions have abused their power and have too much of
> > > > > it.
> > > > > * I'm against Affirmative Action.
> > > > > * I think NAFTA was a bad joke played on us by the Clinton
> > > > > administration.
> > > > > * I was against the original bailouts and am just as against
> > > > > continuing them.
> > > > > * I am former military. I have risked my life for my country. I
> > > > > believe in a strong defense and intel netwrok and I think
> > > > > waterboarding (when done by a pro) is at times, appropriate.
>
> > > > > BUT I don't blindly follow your party line like a good little mindless
> > > > > sheeple so, just as Studio predicted, you have already labeled me as
> > > > > what? "Liberal"? Not "Republican enough"? So how's this attitude of
> > > > > exclusion workin out for your party in the elections recently? Oh
> > > > > yeah, that's right: it was what? 60 senate seats and the largest
> > > > > electoral margin since Reagan? lol no wonder your a little on the
> > > > > bitchy side...
>
> > > > > On Jun 

Re: New to This Group

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Welcome to the group Fred!  Your style sure looks familiar!  Have we
posted on the same board before?

:o)



On Jun 28, 11:45 am, Frederick The Moderate
 wrote:
> Ahhh, the thing about the use of the word Negro. Dude, are you like a
> hundred years old and a member of the KKK or what? Nevermind.
> "Cry for attention"? lol, okay. Just thought i'd introduce myself to
> the group. It's called common courtesy. Obviously a foreign concept to
> you so I won't try to explain.
> You "Go after both of them". Well goody for you! So in other words,
> you're one of those old coots on the porch who bitches about
> everything and does nothing about the same. How productive and
> positive of you! Congrats! You're both negative AND useless! Quite an
> achievement.
> So what? You think you're impressive because you're able to point your
> finger at things you don't like? That's exactly what 5th generation
> welfare recipients do. "Oh this is wrong and that's wrong!". Big deal.
> Call me what you like. Criticism is always easiest for those on the
> sidelines.
>
> On Jun 28, 5:49 am, RichardForbes 
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > No, Mr. Moderate.  I actually saw the stupid Alabama comment you made
> > before I saw your cry for attention.  I happened not to vote for McCai
> > or Obama.  I have had no more negative things to say about Obama than
> > I had to say about Bush.  But, I will go after both of them as they
> > attempt to expand the scope of the imperial federal government and to
> > roll back my individual freedoms and liberties and to expand the
> > "social slavery" state that so many politicians desire.  Feel free to
> > let them be your "master", I have no intention of participating.
>
> > On Jun 27, 10:09 pm, Frederick The Moderate
>
> >  wrote:
> > > RichardForbes  wrote:
>
> > > "My guess is you are full of crap. you managed to hit all the liberal
> > > talking points."
> > > You seem to prove Studio correct. Let's see what you define as
> > > "liberal":
> > > * I think people should be allowed to be as open about their Christian
> > > faith as their sexual persuasion.
> > > * I think labor unions have abused their power and have too much of
> > > it.
> > > * I'm against Affirmative Action.
> > > * I think NAFTA was a bad joke played on us by the Clinton
> > > administration.
> > > * I was against the original bailouts and am just as against
> > > continuing them.
> > > * I am former military. I have risked my life for my country. I
> > > believe in a strong defense and intel netwrok and I think
> > > waterboarding (when done by a pro) is at times, appropriate.
>
> > > BUT I don't blindly follow your party line like a good little mindless
> > > sheeple so, just as Studio predicted, you have already labeled me as
> > > what? "Liberal"? Not "Republican enough"? So how's this attitude of
> > > exclusion workin out for your party in the elections recently? Oh
> > > yeah, that's right: it was what? 60 senate seats and the largest
> > > electoral margin since Reagan? lol no wonder your a little on the
> > > bitchy side...
>
> > > On Jun 27, 7:02 pm,  I have seen many "I am new posts"
>
> > > > and   As time
> > > > passes, we will see if you are what you say and even if you are not,
> > > > your opinion is certainly welcome.
>
> > > > On Jun 27, 9:50 am, Frederick The Moderate
>
> > > >  wrote:
> > > > > Hi Everyone:
>
> > > > > Just thought I'd introduce myself. My first presidential vote was for
> > > > > Reagan and my most recent was for Obama. I'm proud of both of those
> > > > > votes. I am a Christian family man, business owner and former military
> > > > > (Office of Naval Intelligence). My degree is in Theology. So if it
> > > > > wasn't for the total disregard of the Constitution by Bush / Cheney
> > > > > and the GOP's tolerance and condoning of the abandonment of all the
> > > > > things Reagan stood for, I might still be a Republican. As it is, I'm
> > > > > an Independent.
> > > > > Given the mess he inherited, I think Obama is doing okay so far. I'm
> > > > > not happy about the bailouts or the deficit but I don't believe that
> > > > > anyone could have avoided spending some money, to get us out of the
> > > > > total disaster Bush left behind. I'm impressed by the fact that I've
> > > > > seen improvements in the economy over the last few months.
> > > > > I find Rush Limbaugh to epitomize everything that's wrong with my
> > > > > former party. Complete hypocrite. Party before Country. The belief
> > > > > that he should be able to impose morals upon others, while ignoring
> > > > > them himself. What happened to the GOP I was a member of? I voted for
> > > > > Bush Sr. and thought he was a pretty good president. I thought Clinton
> > > > > was lucky at first but his second term convinced me he was a pretty
> > > > > good president too. I didn't care about Lewinsky and don't care about
> > > > > some Argentine girl either.
> > > > > On the other side, I believe labor unions were out of control for
> > > > > dec

Re: Michael Jackson Died

[Mrs. Rabbit]

RIP Michael Jackson and Farrah Fawcett!



On Jun 25, 6:59 pm, Fritz da Cat  wrote:
> He touched so many
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Sanford's South American sojourn taxpayer-funded

[Mrs. Rabbit]

LMAO!

How ya been db??


On Jun 25, 2:48 pm, "d.b.baker"  wrote:
> I'm reserving judgment until I see his paramour. If she's a red-hot
> chili pepper, all is forgiven. If she's an Eleanor, temporary
> insanity, and off to the asylum.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Sanford's South American sojourn taxpayer-funded

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Honestly, I don't care who the hell he sleeps withmakes no
difference to me.  His service and leadership of SC is all I'm
concerned with.  Unlike Clinton, at least he was honest enough to
admit it, once he was caught! ;)



On Jun 25, 10:06 am, RICHARD BROWN 
wrote:
> Americans, infected with the Puritan ethic, are always tittilated and
> outraged with the sexual activities of others.
> For the record, when Eleanor found out that FDR was having an affair
> with Lucy Mercer she stopped sleeping with him, according to their
> children.  Of course her own affair, when she was 45, with 32-year-old
> Earl Miller, the New York State trooper who served as her bodyguard
> during FDR's governorship was not known to her husband. So she could
> pretend to be the "wronged" woman.
> Dik
>
> On Jun 25, 6:33 am, "Mrs. Rabbit"  wrote:
>
>
>
> > Oh yeah, he screwed us!  He hasn't been very "popular" here in SC for
> > a while now.  I have never liked him, especially since he CUT our
> > states education budget to the bone!  I hope they will tar and feather
> > him before they kick his sorry tail out of office!  He's scum, not for
> > his affair(s), but for his lack of leadership in the fine state of
> > South Carolina!
>
> > On Jun 24, 6:05 pm, Fritz da Cat  wrote:
>
> > > Not only was Sanford getting screwed in Argentina he was also screwing
> > > the South Carolina tax payers who unknowingly paid for that trip with
> > > their tax dollars.
>
> > >http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/06/sanfords-south-american-sojourns-tax...- 
> > >Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Sanford's South American sojourn taxpayer-funded

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Oh yeah, he screwed us!  He hasn't been very "popular" here in SC for
a while now.  I have never liked him, especially since he CUT our
states education budget to the bone!  I hope they will tar and feather
him before they kick his sorry tail out of office!  He's scum, not for
his affair(s), but for his lack of leadership in the fine state of
South Carolina!





On Jun 24, 6:05 pm, Fritz da Cat  wrote:
> Not only was Sanford getting screwed in Argentina he was also screwing
> the South Carolina tax payers who unknowingly paid for that trip with
> their tax dollars.
>
> http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/06/sanfords-south-american-sojourns-tax...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Please do this!

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Done!


On Jun 21, 5:20 pm, chirpinginnc  wrote:
> If anyone is on twitter, set your location to Tehran and your time
> zone to GMT +3.30. Security forces are hunting for bloggers using
> location/timezone searches. The more people at this location, the more
> of a logjam it creates for forces trying to shut Iranians' access to
> the internet down. Cut & paste & pass it on. Thanks to YSS for the
> info!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Happy Father's Day

[Mrs. Rabbit]

I second that!  Enjoy your ONE day a year to goof off and not get
yelled at!



On Jun 21, 10:53 am, NavyBrat  wrote:
> To all you Dad's out there. Hope it's a great day for you. :-)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

This day in history......

[Mrs. Rabbit]

George Washington was named Commander In Chief.  June 15, 1775.


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Oh Plainol, Ohio Markie....can we say Revolution?? :o)

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Not just another YouTube, Six Minutes, Thirty Five seconds of a
powerful message.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeYscnFpEyA


Wake up America, it's time to put We The People back in charge!





--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Paul Proctor -- A New Global Currency

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Where are you getting your material from?  Is there a link?



On Mar 26, 9:36 pm, bruce majors  wrote:
> Subject: Re: [Kirsten Andersen Fan Club] oBAMA wANTS bANKS to fAIL
> disaster statism
>
> each failure justifies more government power
>
> see
>
> Ludwig von Mises,"Interventionism"
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:30 PM, raven14002003 
> wrote:
> I saw Morris. he has a point. Why else would Obama pursue this avenue? it
> won't work. it can't work.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Sardar  wrote:
> >    A NEW GLOBAL CURRENCY
>
> > By Paul Proctor
> > March 26, 2009
> > NewsWithViews.com
>
> > It was reported recently that two of the world's superpowers, Russia
> > and China, have called for a new global currency. I believe they're doing
> > this because they know that the U.S. is printing huge amounts of dollars
> > right now to pay on its own massive debts - debts that other countries,
> > like
> > China, have been financing for years by purchasing U.S. Treasury Bonds.
> > They
> > understand something that most Americans do not - that the more paper money
>
> > you print, the less it's worth - and right now, we're printing it as fast
> > as
> > we can.
>
> > We owe China alone over a trillion dollars. And, that's just one of
> > many countries that we owe money to - countries that have also been buying
> > our bonds.
>
> > You see, when you buy a bond, you're loaning money and charging
> > interest to the issuer of that bond to be paid upon maturity. If you buy a
> > U. S. Treasury bond, you're loaning the U.S. government money for them to
> > spend as they see fit.
>
> > When you think of bonds, think of bondage.
>
> > Well, for years now, other countries have been buying our bonds so we
> > could in turn buy all of their made-overseas stuff. They were essentially
> > loaning their biggest customer the money we needed to buy from them.
>
> > That put us in financial bondage to them.
>
> > But, now that we're not buying nearly as much from anyone anymore,
> > resulting in millions of workers being laid off overseas as foreign
> > factories close down, those countries are not buying as many of our
> > Treasury
> > bonds anymore either. In other words, they're not loaning us near as much
> > money as they once did.
>
> > So now, to get America's bills paid, The Federal Reserve is purchasing
> > those U.S. Treasury bonds other countries used to buy - and to do that, a
> > lot more dollars have to be printed to buy them - and I mean a lot more,
> > because, as most everyone knows by now, our debts are quite extraordinary
> > and growing fast.
>
> > Well, who controls the printing of money?
>
> > You guessed it - the same folks who are loaning it to us by purchasing
> > our bonds - a very secret and very private institution called The Federal
> > Reserve. I'll bet you thought they belonged to Uncle Sam, didn't you? Nope,
>
> > Uncle Sam belongs to them because, as the bible teaches, "the borrower is
> > servant to the lender" and the lender here is The Federal Reserve.
>
> > For those who have a hard time understanding how all this affects the
> > average person, let me put it as simply as I know how: It means that the
> > price of everything you and I buy is going to start going up and up as The
> > Federal Reserve has more and more money printed over the coming months and
> > years until even the basic necessities of life here become unaffordable -
> > or
> > until the U.S. government steps in and starts initiating price controls,
> > which frankly, is just more socialism.
>
> > When prices go up, it's called "inflation." And, if prices go up
> > really high and really fast, it's called "hyperinflation." I prefer to call
>
> > it what it really is: the deflation of the dollar. In other words, the
> > goods
> > and services we purchase day-to-day are not really increasing in value as
> > much as the dollars we use to buy them with are decreasing in value.
>
> > Advertisement
>
> > They're decreasing in value because The Federal Reserve has entirely
> > too many of them printed up to loan out. Again, the more there is of
> > something, including money, the less it's worth.
>
> > This sleight-of-hand system, used by The Federal Reserve for decades,
> > makes consumers blame producers, manufacturers, distributors and retailers
> > for rising prices, when they should be blaming those who print all of that
> > paper money for Congress to waste (I mean spend) - money that is not given
> > to the U.S. government by the Federal Reserve, you understand, but is in
> > fact loaned.
>
> > And guess who makes the payments on those loans from The Federal
> > Reserve and pays all of the interest on those piles of paper money created
> > out of nothing?
>
> > That's right - you and I do - in the form of new and higher taxes.
>
> > So, every time a new "stimulus" package is announced, recognize it for
> > what it really is: another huge loan to the American taxpayer to benefit
> > somebody else with payments and int

Re: you are witnessing the totalitarian take over of America

[Mrs. Rabbit]

So true, so true!



On Mar 26, 9:18 pm, OMS-II  wrote:
> Not much left to destroy. The multinationals, with the help of the
> Reps, traded our industrial capacity and infrastructure for a quick
> buckthat just as quickly evaporated. Somebody had to step in. Not
> sure Obama's plan is the greatest, but it can't be any worse than the
> mess GWB got us into.
>
> On Mar 26, 6:33 am, Ohio mark  wrote:
>
>
>
> > government takeover of private companies
> > government takeover of the financial industry
> > government dictating wages and benefits
> > government dictating what cars you can drive
> > government dictating what you may listen to on the radio
> > government confiscation of guns from private citizens
> > government telling you what doctor to see
> > government telling what procedures you can have done
> > government takeover of the print media
>
> > yep you are witnessing the destruction of America, and the creation of
> > amerika.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Damn straight social medicine works

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Hi Bruce, it's apparent you don't know Mark aka TAO!  He lives in the
land of milk and honey, not here in the US.  So, our government won't
be feeding him.   Hey, that means more for us eh?  =D

LOL @ bruce for asking Plainol if he's ready for the
revolution...hehehe, you two are going to get along just fine!  Well,
that's if you don't mind southern rednecks!  ;)









On Mar 26, 7:23 pm, bruce majors  wrote:
> poor moronic puppet...
>
> read more »
>
> is that the best your masters have taught you in defending their schemes
> against exposure
>
> they won't be feeding you during the food rationing
>
> you'll be sent to the processing plant
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:14 PM, THE ANNOINTED ONE 
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Speaking of BLOVIATING>
>
> > On Mar 26, 10:58 am, bruce majors  wrote:
> > > I don't think you tax predators and their flaks are even 50% yet.
>
> > > But no matter.  You were dependent on being able to sell China and others
> > > promissary notes where you promised to parasitize and enslave future
> > > generations of tax slaves to pay back the debt on any money they would
> > loan
> > > you
>
> > > And they aren't buying any more
>
> > > So your system of slavery is going to collapse soon anyway
>
> > > Or are you some little cannon fodder dupe who believes the pseudo class
> > > analysis your Hitlers fed you?
>
> > > No matter
>
> > > you will be starving and in a food riot during the hyper-inflation anyway
>
> > > you don't sound smart enough to survive
>
> > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Ray  wrote:
> > > >    Sure. Go for it, if you think your 5% of the population can take the
> > > > other 95% of us.
>
> > > > Of course, you're probably not in the top 5% anyway, unless you married
> > > > well.
>
> > > >  --
> > > > *From:* thepoliticalspinr...@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
> > > > thepoliticalspinr...@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf Of *bruce majors
> > > > *Sent:* Thursday, March 26, 2009 9:38 AM
> > > > *To:* thepoliticalspinr...@yahoogroups.com
> > > > *Subject:* Re: [The Political Spin Room] Re: Damn straight social
> > medicine
> > > > works
>
> > > > so then there is no reason for we productive people to just have you
> > shot
> > > > then
>
> > > > since you have announced your intentions to rape, mug, and rob
>
> > > > very good then
>
> > > > your name is on the list for the revolution
>
> > > > do you currently live off your mommie?  is she conscious btw?  do you
> > just
> > > > cash her disability checks for her?
>
> > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Ray  wrote:
>
> > > >>   I have no sympathy for the very wealthy and could care less if
> > they're
> > > >> being
> > > >> asked to ante up more money.
>
> > > >> -Original Message-
> > > >> From: thepoliticalspinr...@yahoogroups.com > 40yahoogroups.com>
> > > >> [mailto:thepoliticalspinr...@yahoogroups.com > 40yahoogroups.com>]
> > > >> On Behalf Of gengelhorn
> > > >> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 8:41 AM
> > > >> To: thepoliticalspinr...@yahoogroups.com > 40yahoogroups.com>
> > > >> Subject: [The Political Spin Room] Re: Damn straight social medicine
> > works
>
> > > >> I don't know if you read the part of my post about my uncle, but the
> > > >> ironic
> > > >> thing is that his life was built upon the back of working class
> > people,
> > > >> namely my grandparents. My grandpa retired from schilling spice
> > company in
> > > >> the werehouse department. My grandma owned a beauty salon for 30 some
> > > >> years. My uncle took advantage of this stable working class familly
> > > >> environement to become the success story he is. But now he patronizes
> > my
> > > >> mothers side of the familly, my mother was the black sheep so to
> > speak. We
> > > >> have Christmas dinner with them every year and play act like we like
> > each
> > > >> other. But the atmosphere is so phoney it makes me want to puke
> > sometimes.
> > > >> This is probably a big reason why I have little patience for the very
> > > >> wealthy. I'm every bit as intelligent as my two cousins, but they got
> > the
> > > >> private school educations, bought and paid for by daddy, while I
> > funded my
> > > >> own city college education which I would have finished had I not
> > > >> discovered
> > > >> the stock market. I've been a cl
> > > >> ose observer of both sides of the tracks in my time, and I feel I have
> > a
> > > >> unique perspective.
> > > >>  --- In thepoliticalspinr...@yahoogroups.com > 40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > >> "Ray"  wrote:
>
> > > >> > The insurance companies are just a bad middleman that provide no
> > added
> > > >> > value to the process.
>
> > > >> > -Original Message-
> > > >> > From: thepoliticalspinr...@yahoogroups.com > 40yahoogroups.com>
> > > >> > [mailto:thepoliticalspinr...@yahoogroups.com > 40yahoogroups.com>]
> > > >> On Behalf Of gengelhorn
> > > >> > Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:51 AM
> > > >> > To: thepoliticalspinr...@yahoogroups.com > 40yahoogroups

Re: 50 Facts Each Of You To Know... ( AMAZING INFO MUST READ )

[Mrs. Rabbit]

You beAt me to it Travis!

The Y is the vowel Bruce.  AEIOU and sometimes Y!



On Mar 24, 8:00 am, Travis  wrote:
> #6 is incorrect
>
> read more »
>
>  funlok44_4__3.jpg
> 28KViewDownload
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 5:59 AM, bruce majors wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >    *50 Facts each of you to know...*
>
> > collection of information articles?click to Join 
> > Us
>
> > 1 The word "queue" is the only word in the English language that is still
> > pronounced the same way when the last four letters are removed.
>
> > *
>
> > 2 Beetles taste like apples, wasps like pine nuts, and worms like fried
> > bacon.
>
> > *
>
> > 3 Of all the words in the English language, the word 'set' has the most
> > definitions!
>
> > *
>
> > 5 "Almost" is the longest word in the English language with all the letters
> > in alphabetical order.
>
> > *
>
> > 6 "Rhythm" is the longest English word without a vowel.
>
> > *
>
> > 7 In 1386, a pig in France was executed by public hanging for the murder of
> > a child
>
> > *
>
> > 8 A cockroach can live several weeks with its head cut off!
>
> > *
>
> > 9 Human thigh bones are stronger than concrete.
>
> > *
>
> > 10 You can't kill yourself by holding your breath
>
> > *
>
> > 11 There is a city called Rome on every continent.
>
> > *
>
> > 12 It's against the law to have a pet dog in Iceland!
>
> > *
>
> > 13 Your heart beats over 100,000 times a day!
>
> > *
>
> > 14 Horatio Nelson, one of England's most illustrious admirals was
> > throughout his life, never able to find a cure for his sea-sickness.
>
> > *
>
> > 15 The skeleton of Jeremy Bentham is present at all important meetings of
> > the University of London
>
> > *
>
> > 16 Right handed people live, on average, nine years longer than left-handed
> > people
>
> > *
>
> > 17 Your ribs move about 5 million times a year, everytime you breathe!
>
> > *
>
> > 18 The elephant is the only mammal that can't jump!
>
> > *
>
> > 19 One quarter of the bones in your body, are in your feet!
>
> > *
>
> > 20 Like fingerprints, everyone's tongue print is different!
>
> > *
>
> > 21 The first known transfusion of blood was performed as early as 1667,
> > when Jean-Baptiste, transfused two pints of blood from a sheep to a young
> > man
>
> > *
>
> > 22 Fingernails grow nearly 4 times faster than toenails! Most dust
> > particles in your house are made from dead skin!
>
> > *
>
> > 23 The present population of 5 billion plus people of the world is
> > predicted to become 15 billion by 2080.
>
> > *
>
> > 24 A Women blink nearly twice as much as men.
>
> > *
>
> > 25 Adolf Hitler was a vegetarian, and had only ONE testicle.
>
> > *
>
> > 26 Honey is the only food that does not spoil. Honey found in the tombs of
> > Egyptian pharaohs has been tasted by archaeologists and found edible.
>
> > *
>
> > 27 Months that begin on a Sunday will always have a "Friday the 13th."
>
> > *
>
> > 28 Coca-Cola would be green if colouring weren't added to it.
>
> > *
>
> > 29 On average a hedgehog's heart beats 300 times a minute.
>
> > *
>
> > 30 More people are killed each year from bees than from snakes.
>
> > *
>
> > 31 The average lead pencil will draw a line 35 miles long or write
> > approximately 50,000 English words.
>
> > *
>
> > 32More people are allergic to cow's milk than any other food.
>
> > *
>
> > 33Camels have three eyelids to protect themselves from blowing sand.
>
> > *
>
> > 34 The placement of a donkey's eyes in its' heads enables it to see all
> > four feet at all times!
>
> > *
>
> > 35The six official languages of the United Nations are: English, French,
> > Arabic, Chinese, Russian and Spanish.
>
> > *
>
> > 36 Earth is the only planet not named after a god.
>
> > *
>
> > 37 It's against the law to burp, or sneeze in a church in Nebraska, USA.
>
> > *
>
> > 38 You're born with 300 bones, but by the time you become an adult, you
> > only have 206.
>
> > *
>
> > 39 Some worms will eat themselves if they can't find any food!
>
> > *
>
> > 40 Dolphins sleep with one eye open!
>
> > *
>
> > 41 It is impossible to sneeze with your eyes open
>
> > *
>
> > 42 The worlds oldest piece of chewing gum is 9000 years old!
>
> > *
>
> > 43 The longest recorded flight of a chicken is 13 seconds
>
> > *
>
> > 44 Queen Elizabet

Iran's leader dismisses Obama offer

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Khamenei knows Obama is full of bolonga and that's a scary thought.
OMG, Change we can believe in??  My arse, it's more of the same ole
crap, just a different arse in charge!  



Iran's supreme leader has dismissed overtures from the US president,
saying Tehran does not see any change in US policy under Barack
Obama's administration.

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said in a speech on Saturday that there could
be no change in US-Iran relations unless Obama puts an end to US
hostility towards Iran and brings "real changes" in US foreign policy.

He made the remarks in a televised speech in the city of Mashhad to
mark the Iranian New Year.

Commenting on Obama's videotaped offer of a "new beginning" in
relations between the two countries, Khamenei said Iran has yet to see
any change in Washington's attitude towards it.

"They chant the slogan of change but no change is seen in practice. We
haven't seen any change," he said.

Khamenei criticised US behaviour towards Iran since its 1979 Islamic
revolution, saying that the US was "hated in the world" and should
stop interfering in other countries' internal affairs.

He asked how Obama could congratulate Iranians on the new year while
the US continues to accuse the country of supporting terrorism and
seeking nuclear weapons.

Saying that a change of US words was not enough, Khamenei said:  "We
will watch and we will judge ... You change, our behaviour will
change."

Nuclear disagreement

The US is at odds with Iran over its nuclear programme, which
Washington says is aimed at building atomic weapons, while Tehran
insists it is for the peaceful generation of electricity.

It is also concerned over Iran's missile-development efforts.

The US cut off diplomatic ties with Iran during the 1979-1981 hostage
crisis, in which a group of Iranian students held 52 US diplomats
hostage at the American embassy for 444 days.


Read more:
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/americas/2009/03/200932184033678481.html


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: URGENT! Single mom needs $250 right away to avoid becoming homeless!

[Mrs. Rabbit]

Wow, there to too many questions as to her situation before I would
even think about sending any funds her way.


On Mar 17, 10:40 am, RW  wrote:
> URGENT! Single mom needs $250 right away to avoid becoming homeless!
> URGENT! A woman I've been helping needs $250 right away to pay her
> rent or she will be evicted. She needs it by the end of March. Located
> in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, was recently laid off and needs help to pay
> her rent. She's a single mom who has to pay child support out of her
> unemployment check. She will have a roommate next month to share the
> rent.http://www.squidoo.com/tithes-and-offerings
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---