Re: Building GCC-4.8.1 without ports
On 09/11/13 05:21, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2013/09/11 12:06, niXman wrote: 2013/9/11 Stuart Henderson The error message gives quite a good clue: relocation R_X86_64_32 can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC Maybe, but it doesn't speak to me about anything. Can you help me? "recompile with -fPIC" seems clear to me. If this doesn't mean anything to you, I don't think you should be trying to port GCC by yourself. As Marc said, use the port. I think you have something of a learning curve here, and starting with something like the port is a great idea. Marc et al have put in hordes of time on GCC. You want to really learn it--fine! But start upon the work of others, so you can see how it integrates into OpenBSD, and how it is built. The port is a great example (probably the best there is) as to how to do this. I think you need to over what Makefiles are, and the whole GNU build system. You have a complex thing to study, but if you take it apart you'll see how something that works was created. Lastly, you might look at a more simple port first, to see how that works. I daresay GCC is in the top 5% of ports, in terms of complexity. --STeve Andre'
Re: small www/apache-httpd fixes: rc script and readme
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:38:54PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2013/09/11 22:26, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:50:14PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > This fixes two small issues with www/apache-httpd: > > > > > > - The rc script doesn't work out of the box because it doesn't pass > > >the -k option needed for 'start|stop|...' arguments. I hope my > > >way of fixing it is appropriate, and welcome other suggestions. > > > > Hmm... it works fine for me. What error are you running into exactly? > > It works for me as-is too, though I think -k is more correct (the usage > text implies that you have to use it) Sure but in this case, specific rc_ functions must be written. > > > - The readme implies that chroot is not available, while it has > > >been available since 2.2.10 and does indeed work as advertised. > > >http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mpm_common.html#chrootdir > > How about removing MESSAGE? We're trying to get rid of base httpd.. +1 -- Antoine
small www/apache-httpd fixes: rc script and readme
This fixes two small issues with www/apache-httpd:
- The rc script doesn't work out of the box because it doesn't pass
the -k option needed for 'start|stop|...' arguments. I hope my
way of fixing it is appropriate, and welcome other suggestions.
- The readme implies that chroot is not available, while it has
been available since 2.2.10 and does indeed work as advertised.
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mpm_common.html#chrootdir
ok?
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/apache-httpd/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.38
diff -u -p -r1.38 Makefile
--- Makefile12 Jul 2013 13:21:25 - 1.38
+++ Makefile11 Sep 2013 19:39:40 -
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
COMMENT= apache HTTP server
V= 2.2.25
+REVISION= 1
PKGNAME= apache-httpd-${V}
DISTNAME= httpd-${V}
Index: pkg/MESSAGE
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/apache-httpd/pkg/MESSAGE,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
diff -u -p -r1.1.1.1 MESSAGE
--- pkg/MESSAGE 14 Dec 2006 07:14:21 - 1.1.1.1
+++ pkg/MESSAGE 11 Sep 2013 19:40:48 -
@@ -3,6 +3,5 @@ provided as a port for those who, for va
version 2.
OpenBSD provides a custom Apache server, httpd(8), in the base system
-which has been audited for security and may run in a chroot(2)
-environment. Users are STRONGLY encouraged to use the system httpd
-rather than this port.
+which has been audited for security. Users are STRONGLY encouraged to
+use the system httpd rather than this port.
Index: pkg/httpd2.rc
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/apache-httpd/pkg/httpd2.rc,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -p -r1.1 httpd2.rc
--- pkg/httpd2.rc 18 Jul 2012 08:45:42 - 1.1
+++ pkg/httpd2.rc 11 Sep 2013 19:40:21 -
@@ -10,4 +10,6 @@ rc_pre() {
rm -f /var/apache2/logs/{ssl_mutex,httpd.lock,accept.lock}.*
}
+daemon_flags="${daemon_flags} -k"
+
rc_cmd $1
Re: small www/apache-httpd fixes: rc script and readme
On 2013/09/11 22:26, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:50:14PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > This fixes two small issues with www/apache-httpd: > > > > - The rc script doesn't work out of the box because it doesn't pass > >the -k option needed for 'start|stop|...' arguments. I hope my > >way of fixing it is appropriate, and welcome other suggestions. > > Hmm... it works fine for me. What error are you running into exactly? It works for me as-is too, though I think -k is more correct (the usage text implies that you have to use it) > > - The readme implies that chroot is not available, while it has > >been available since 2.2.10 and does indeed work as advertised. > >http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mpm_common.html#chrootdir How about removing MESSAGE? We're trying to get rid of base httpd..
Re: small www/apache-httpd fixes: rc script and readme
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:50:14PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> This fixes two small issues with www/apache-httpd:
>
> - The rc script doesn't work out of the box because it doesn't pass
>the -k option needed for 'start|stop|...' arguments. I hope my
>way of fixing it is appropriate, and welcome other suggestions.
Hmm... it works fine for me. What error are you running into exactly?
>
> - The readme implies that chroot is not available, while it has
>been available since 2.2.10 and does indeed work as advertised.
>http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mpm_common.html#chrootdir
>
> ok?
>
> Index: Makefile
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/apache-httpd/Makefile,v
> retrieving revision 1.38
> diff -u -p -r1.38 Makefile
> --- Makefile 12 Jul 2013 13:21:25 - 1.38
> +++ Makefile 11 Sep 2013 19:39:40 -
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> COMMENT= apache HTTP server
>
> V= 2.2.25
> +REVISION=1
> PKGNAME= apache-httpd-${V}
> DISTNAME=httpd-${V}
>
> Index: pkg/MESSAGE
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/apache-httpd/pkg/MESSAGE,v
> retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
> diff -u -p -r1.1.1.1 MESSAGE
> --- pkg/MESSAGE 14 Dec 2006 07:14:21 - 1.1.1.1
> +++ pkg/MESSAGE 11 Sep 2013 19:40:48 -
> @@ -3,6 +3,5 @@ provided as a port for those who, for va
> version 2.
>
> OpenBSD provides a custom Apache server, httpd(8), in the base system
> -which has been audited for security and may run in a chroot(2)
> -environment. Users are STRONGLY encouraged to use the system httpd
> -rather than this port.
> +which has been audited for security. Users are STRONGLY encouraged to
> +use the system httpd rather than this port.
> Index: pkg/httpd2.rc
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/apache-httpd/pkg/httpd2.rc,v
> retrieving revision 1.1
> diff -u -p -r1.1 httpd2.rc
> --- pkg/httpd2.rc 18 Jul 2012 08:45:42 - 1.1
> +++ pkg/httpd2.rc 11 Sep 2013 19:40:21 -
> @@ -10,4 +10,6 @@ rc_pre() {
> rm -f /var/apache2/logs/{ssl_mutex,httpd.lock,accept.lock}.*
> }
>
> +daemon_flags="${daemon_flags} -k"
> +
> rc_cmd $1
>
--
Antoine
Re: UPDATE: cairo 1.12.16
On 27/08/13 4:17 AM, Brad Smith wrote: An update to cairo 1.12.16. OK? ping. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/graphics/cairo/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.51 diff -u -p -r1.51 Makefile --- Makefile1 Jun 2013 12:11:52 - 1.51 +++ Makefile27 Aug 2013 05:20:21 - @@ -2,14 +2,13 @@ COMMENT= vector graphics library -DISTNAME= cairo-1.12.14 +DISTNAME= cairo-1.12.16 SHARED_LIBS+= cairo 12.2 SHARED_LIBS+= cairo-gobject 1.0 SHARED_LIBS+= cairo-script-interpreter 1.1 CATEGORIES= graphics DPB_PROPERTIES= parallel EXTRACT_SUFX= .tar.xz -REVISION= 0 HOMEPAGE= http://cairographics.org/ Index: distinfo === RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/graphics/cairo/distinfo,v retrieving revision 1.21 diff -u -p -r1.21 distinfo --- distinfo4 Mar 2013 20:40:18 - 1.21 +++ distinfo27 Aug 2013 05:06:35 - @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -SHA256 (cairo-1.12.14.tar.xz) = ltDR4/m3TSyjRp/xh8Xl8lZJsa01zwb086g4R9/0rBM= -SIZE (cairo-1.12.14.tar.xz) = 42132464 +SHA256 (cairo-1.12.16.tar.xz) = JQWVnrPx3j4YQQI7YVhb/TVoS5czx7ajZD9PTL3m2EY= +SIZE (cairo-1.12.16.tar.xz) = 35889824 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: Building GCC-4.8.1 without ports
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 04:14:23PM +0400, niXman wrote: > 2013/9/11 Tobias Ulmer: > > This is only the first of many many errors. There is no support for > > OpenBSD in vanilla gcc. > > Why not send patches to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org ? Because it's work. Do you volunteer? > > > -- > Regards, > niXman > ___ > Dual-target(32 & 64-bit) MinGW compilers for 32 and 64-bit Windows: > http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingwbuilds/ > ___ > Another online IDE: http://liveworkspace.org/ >
Re: [NEW] Terminology-0.3.0
Thanks for looking ! I join to this mail a corrected version of port. 2013/9/9 Stuart Henderson > On 2013/09/09 13:04, Brian Callahan wrote: > > On 9/9/2013 12:51 PM, Azwaw OUSADOU wrote: > > >Hi ! > > > > > >I ported terminology, the terminal emulator supported by e17. > > > > > >Tested with an amd64 > > > > > >Please test it ! > > >Thanks > > > > > > > Really quick untested eyeball: > > * You only need PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM=Yes > > * Missing PLIST goo > > To be more specific this needs the update-desktop-database markers that > you'll see in many other ports. Add them in the same place in PLIST as > is normally done. > Corrected. > > > * That DESCR is huge. You definitely don't need "Extract from > > website" and probably a lot of that other stuff too. > > Suggested alternative: > > Terminology is an X11 terminal, emulating a slightly extended vt100 > supporting most xterm/rxvt additions. It was written for Enlightenment, > but can be used with other desktop environments. Features include > address detection, transparency, backgrounds, themes, multiple tabs, > and support for inline display of various media by using helper apps. > > I like your description. Used in place of description copied from terminology website. > Other things: > > - inconsistent spacing styles in Makefile, some lines are 'FOO+=' > others are 'FOO += ...' > > - trailing whitespace in CONFIGURE_ENV > > - typo in directory name, s/terminolgy/terminology/ > > Corrected. > - does it actually need separate copies of the fonts or can it > use the ones from X / other packages? if it needs separate ones for > some reason, then you are missing license markers for fonts e.g. > terminus should be OFL. > > You right ! Port use now package terminus-font. Others polices are XFont copies, except nexus font. I have not informations for this police. https://github.com/kakaroto/e17/tree/master/terminology/data/fonts terminology.tar.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Re: Building GCC-4.8.1 without ports
2013/9/11 Tobias Ulmer: > Because it's work. Do you volunteer? Yes, I will, if someone will coordinate me. First of all, I need a description of what exactly problem is solved by each patch. -- Regards, niXman ___ Dual-target(32 & 64-bit) MinGW compilers for 32 and 64-bit Windows: http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingwbuilds/ ___ Another online IDE: http://liveworkspace.org/
Re: Building GCC-4.8.1 without ports
2013/9/11 Gregor Best : > If you understood what -fPIC meant, and if you understood the message, > it should be clear what you have to do. Let's say you know that I need to rebuild with '-fPIC'... Then tell me please, why gcc and libgcc are configured and built successfully, but libgomp is not? -- Regards, niXman
Re: Building GCC-4.8.1 without ports
2013/9/11 Tobias Ulmer: > This is only the first of many many errors. There is no support for > OpenBSD in vanilla gcc. Why not send patches to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org ? -- Regards, niXman ___ Dual-target(32 & 64-bit) MinGW compilers for 32 and 64-bit Windows: http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingwbuilds/ ___ Another online IDE: http://liveworkspace.org/
Re: Building GCC-4.8.1 without ports
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 02:01:23PM +0400, niXman wrote: > 2013/9/11 Stuart Henderson > > "recompile with -fPIC" seems clear to me. If this doesn't mean anything > > to you, I don't think you should be trying to port GCC by yourself. > > I understand that. I do not understand what I have to rebuild with '-fPIC'? > GCC? > /tmp/ccgLXgHL.o? > Or something else? This is only the first of many many errors. There is no support for OpenBSD in vanilla gcc. > > > -- > Regards, > niXman >
Re: Building GCC-4.8.1 without ports
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 02:01:23PM +0400, niXman wrote: > [...] > I understand that. I do not understand what I have to rebuild with '-fPIC'? > GCC? > [...] If you understood what -fPIC meant, and if you understood the message, it should be clear what you have to do. Might I ask why you are trying to redo the effort of porting GCC-4.8 without using the ports infrastructure, the existing port or the existing pre-compiled package? -- Gregor Best
Re: Building GCC-4.8.1 without ports
2013/9/11 Stuart Henderson > "recompile with -fPIC" seems clear to me. If this doesn't mean anything > to you, I don't think you should be trying to port GCC by yourself. I understand that. I do not understand what I have to rebuild with '-fPIC'? GCC? /tmp/ccgLXgHL.o? Or something else? -- Regards, niXman
Re: Building GCC-4.8.1 without ports
On 2013/09/11 12:06, niXman wrote: > 2013/9/11 Stuart Henderson > > The error message gives quite a good clue: > > > > relocation R_X86_64_32 can not be used when making a shared object; > > recompile with -fPIC > > Maybe, but it doesn't speak to me about anything. Can you help me? "recompile with -fPIC" seems clear to me. If this doesn't mean anything to you, I don't think you should be trying to port GCC by yourself.
Re: UPDATE: databases/py-sqlite
On 2013/09/11 10:47, Giovanni Bechis wrote: > On 09/11/13 00:45, Giovanni Bechis wrote: > > Major update to latest version, now it links with sqlite3 instead of > > sqlite2. > > Comments ? Ok ? > > Cheers > >Giovanni > > > As spotted by ajacoutot@, security/yubiserve needs this patch to work, I do > not have a yubikey to test it with, any testers ? > Cheers > Giovanni > > My yubiserve box is running 5.4, I'll try and get something else setup to test this with..
Re: UPDATE: databases/py-sqlite
On 09/11/13 00:45, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> Major update to latest version, now it links with sqlite3 instead of sqlite2.
> Comments ? Ok ?
> Cheers
>Giovanni
>
As spotted by ajacoutot@, security/yubiserve needs this patch to work, I do not
have a yubikey to test it with, any testers ?
Cheers
Giovanni
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/security/yubiserve/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.3 Makefile
--- Makefile 7 Aug 2013 21:32:35 - 1.3
+++ Makefile 11 Sep 2013 08:44:28 -
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
COMMENT= standalone Yubikey and OATH/HOTP validation server
DISTNAME= yubico-yubiserve-3.1
-REVISION= 0
+REVISION= 1
EXTRACT_SUFX= .zip
UNZIP= unzip -a
PKGNAME= ${DISTNAME:S/yubico-//}
Index: patches/patch-dbconf_py
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/security/yubiserve/patches/patch-dbconf_py,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.1.1.1 patch-dbconf_py
--- patches/patch-dbconf_py 18 Jul 2012 08:25:07 - 1.1.1.1
+++ patches/patch-dbconf_py 11 Sep 2013 08:44:28 -
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ $OpenBSD: patch-dbconf_py,v 1.1.1.1 2012
sqlite3 support from http://code.google.com/p/yubico-yubiserve/source/list r39
dbconf.py.orig Wed Jul 18 01:16:24 2012
-+++ dbconf.py Wed Jul 18 01:04:51 2012
+--- dbconf.py.orig Wed Sep 11 10:39:49 2013
dbconf.py Wed Sep 11 10:40:18 2013
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-#!/usr/bin/python
+#!${MODPY_BIN}
@@ -28,7 +28,19 @@ sqlite3 support from http://code.google.
keys = {}
for line in config:
match = re.search('(.*?)=(.*);', line)
-@@ -54,14 +58,15 @@ if config['yubiDB'] == 'mysql' and (config['yubiMySQLH
+@@ -47,6 +51,11 @@ try:
+ isThereSqlite = True
+ except NameError:
+ isThereSqlite = False
++try:
++ if sqlite3 != None:
++ isThereSqlite = True
++except NameError:
++ isThereSqlite = False
+ if isThereMysql == isThereSqlite == False:
+ print "Cannot continue without any database support.\nPlease read README.\n\n"
+ quit()
+@@ -54,14 +63,15 @@ if config['yubiDB'] == 'mysql' and (config['yubiMySQLH
print "Cannot continue without any MySQL configuration.\nPlease read README.\n\n"
quit()
try:
@@ -47,7 +59,7 @@ sqlite3 support from http://code.google.
if (len(argv)<2):
print ' == YubiServe Key Management Tool 2.0 ==\n'
print ' -ya\tAdd a new Yubikey'
-@@ -84,13 +89,15 @@ else:
+@@ -84,13 +94,15 @@ else:
if argv[1][0:2] == '-y': # Yubico Yubikey
if (argv[1][2] == 'd') and (len(argv)>2):
nickname = re.escape(argv[2])
@@ -68,7 +80,7 @@ sqlite3 support from http://code.google.
print "Key '" + nickname + "' disabled."
con.commit()
else:
-@@ -98,12 +105,14 @@ else:
+@@ -98,12 +110,14 @@ else:
elif (argv[1][2] == 'e') and (len(argv)>2):
nickname = re.escape(argv[2])
@@ -87,7 +99,7 @@ sqlite3 support from http://code.google.
cur.execute("UPDATE yubikeys SET active = '1' WHERE nickname = '" + nickname + "'")
print "Key '" + nickname + "' enabled."
con.commit()
-@@ -111,8 +120,9 @@ else:
+@@ -111,8 +125,9 @@ else:
print 'Key is already enabled.'
elif (argv[1][2] == 'k') and (len(argv)>2):
nickname = re.escape(argv[2])
@@ -99,7 +111,7 @@ sqlite3 support from http://code.google.
print 'Key not found.'
else:
cur.execute("DELETE FROM yubikeys WHERE nickname = '" + nickname + "'")
-@@ -121,8 +131,9 @@ else:
+@@ -121,8 +136,9 @@ else:
elif (argv[1][2] == 'a') and (len(argv)>4):
nickname = re.escape(argv[2])
if ((len(argv[2])<=16) and (len(argv[3]) <= 16) and (len(argv[4]) <= 12) and (len(argv[5])<=32)):
@@ -111,7 +123,7 @@ sqlite3 support from http://code.google.
cur.execute("INSERT INTO yubikeys VALUES ('" + argv[2] + "', '" + argv[3] + "', '" + time.strftime("%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ", time.gmtime()) + "', '" + argv[4] + "', '" + argv[5] + "', 1, 1, 1)")
con.commit()
print "Key '" + argv[2] + "' added to database."
-@@ -133,13 +144,14 @@ else:
+@@ -133,13 +149,14 @@ else:
print 'Secretid must be 12 characters max, aeskey must be 32 characters max.\n'
quit()
elif (argv[1][2] == 'l'):
@@ -132,7 +144,7 @@ sqlite3 support from http://code.google.
print ''
else:
print 'No keys in database\n'
-@@ -148,12 +160,14 @@ else:
+@@ -148,12 +165,14 @@ else:
elif argv[1][0:2] == '-h':
if (argv[1][2] == 'd') and (len(argv)>2):
nickname = re.escape(argv[2])
@@ -151,7 +163,7 @@ sqlite3 support from http://code.google.
cur.execute("UPDATE oathtokens SET active = '1' WHERE nickname = '" + nickname + "'")
print "Key '" + nickname + "' disabled."
con.commit()
-@@ -162,12 +176,14 @@ else:
+@@ -162,12 +181,14 @@ else:
elif (argv[1][2] == 'e') and (len(argv)>2):
nickname = re.escape(argv[2])
@@ -170,7 +182,7 @@ sqlite3 support from http://code.google.
cur.execute("UPDATE oathtokens SET active = '1' WHERE nicknam
Re: Building GCC-4.8.1 without ports
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 12:06:20PM +0400, niXman wrote: > 2013/9/11 Stuart Henderson > > The error message gives quite a good clue: > > > > relocation R_X86_64_32 can not be used when making a shared object; > > recompile with -fPIC > > Maybe, but it doesn't speak to me about anything. Can you help me? Yes, USE THE FUCKING PORT.
Re: Building GCC-4.8.1 without ports
2013/9/11 Stuart Henderson > The error message gives quite a good clue: > > relocation R_X86_64_32 can not be used when making a shared object; recompile > with -fPIC Maybe, but it doesn't speak to me about anything. Can you help me? -- Regards, niXman
Re: llvm and libc++
On 2013/09/11 09:05, niXman wrote: > Hi, > > Tell me please, why LLVM is built without clang-libc++[1] support? > > > [1] http://libcxx.llvm.org/ > > -- > Regards, > niXman > Not yet ported.
Re: Building GCC-4.8.1 without ports
On 2013/09/11 10:07, niXman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I try to build GCC-4.8.1 on pre 5.4 without ports and faced with the
> following error when libgomp is configured:
> configure:3664: checking for C compiler default output file name
> configure:3686: /home/nixman/build/./gcc/xgcc
> -B/home/nixman/build/./gcc/
> -B/home/nixman/prefix/x86_64-unknown-openbsd5.4/bin/
> -B/home/nixman/prefix/x86_64-unknown-openbsd5.4/lib/ -isystem
> /home/nixman/prefix/x86_64-unknown-openbsd5.4/include -isystem
> /home/nixman/prefix/x86_64-unknown-openbsd5.4/sys-include-g -O2
> conftest.c >&5
> /usr/bin/ld: /tmp//ccgLXgHL.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 can not be used
> when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
> /tmp//ccgLXgHL.o: could not read symbols: Bad value
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> configure:3690: $? = 1
> configure:3727: result:
> configure: failed program was:
> ...
> ...
> configure:3733: error: in
> `/home/nixman/build/x86_64-unknown-openbsd5.4/libgomp':
> configure:3736: error: C compiler cannot create executables
>
>
> GCC configured with:
> --prefix=/home/nixman/prefix \
> --disable-shared \
> --with-{gmp,mpfr,mpc}=/home/nixman/prefix \
> --disable-nls \
> --disable-miltilib \
> --with-gnu-as \
> --with-gnu-ld \
> --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,go \
> --host=x86_64-unknown-openbsd5.4 \
> --build=x86_64-unknown-openbsd5.4 \
> --target=x86_64-unknown-openbsd5.4
>
> gmp,mpfr,mpc configured witg --disable-shared
>
> Ideas?
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Regards,
> niXman
>
The error message gives quite a good clue:
relocation R_X86_64_32 can not be used when making a shared object; recompile
with -fPIC
Re: Building GCC-4.8.1 without ports
On Wed, September 11, 2013 10:07, niXman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I try to build GCC-4.8.1 on pre 5.4 without ports and faced with the
> following error when libgomp is configured:
Any reason for building it outside ports-tree?
> configure:3664: checking for C compiler default output file name
> configure:3686: /home/nixman/build/./gcc/xgcc
> -B/home/nixman/build/./gcc/
> -B/home/nixman/prefix/x86_64-unknown-openbsd5.4/bin/
> -B/home/nixman/prefix/x86_64-unknown-openbsd5.4/lib/ -isystem
> /home/nixman/prefix/x86_64-unknown-openbsd5.4/include -isystem
> /home/nixman/prefix/x86_64-unknown-openbsd5.4/sys-include-g -O2
> conftest.c >&5
> /usr/bin/ld: /tmp//ccgLXgHL.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 can not be used
> when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
> /tmp//ccgLXgHL.o: could not read symbols: Bad value
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> configure:3690: $? = 1
> configure:3727: result:
> configure: failed program was:
> ...
> ...
> configure:3733: error: in
> `/home/nixman/build/x86_64-unknown-openbsd5.4/libgomp':
> configure:3736: error: C compiler cannot create executables
>
>
> GCC configured with:
> --prefix=/home/nixman/prefix \
> --disable-shared \
> --with-{gmp,mpfr,mpc}=/home/nixman/prefix \
> --disable-nls \
> --disable-miltilib \
> --with-gnu-as \
> --with-gnu-ld \
> --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,go \
> --host=x86_64-unknown-openbsd5.4 \
> --build=x86_64-unknown-openbsd5.4 \
> --target=x86_64-unknown-openbsd5.4
>
> gmp,mpfr,mpc configured witg --disable-shared
>
> Ideas?
May be ls /usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.8/patches/ |wc -l
102
>
> Thanks!
>
