[NEW] books/tex-by-topic
Hello, from pkg/DESCR: TeX by Topic is a systematic reference manual designed as a companion to tutorial guides on the system. Packed with original, practical ideas, this book provides an invaluable information source that will give the TeX user the essential insight needed to solve TeX problems. Comments ? ok ? Cheers, -- Vincent / dermiste tex-by-topic.tar.gz Description: application/tar-gz
Re: Unbreak lang/seed7 on hppa
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 08:07:47PM +0100, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:32:58PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:51:06AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > Is this instead a target dependency issue? If you do "make a b c" without
> > > Makefile dependencies between them, I don't think there's any guarantee
> > > that they will run in order.
> >
> > There isn't, indeed.
> >
> > make in "traditional non-parallel mode" will tend to run them in order,
> > as lots of people don't know how to use make so that things are a bit
> > friendlier, but I don't know if gmake does the same, and it's certainly
> > not guaranteed.
> >
>
> I've found where is the error. I had "MAKE_JOBS=2" in /etc/mk.conf.
> On my other machines, I have "PARALLEL_BUILD=NO" so I was not seeing the
> same error.
>
> OK to unbreak the package on hppa? All tests pass.
Did a quick test build/check on hppa, OK by me.
>
>
> Index: Makefile
> ===
> RCS file: /usr/cvsync/ports/lang/seed7/Makefile,v
> retrieving revision 1.14
> diff -u -p -r1.14 Makefile
> --- Makefile 19 Jan 2014 20:21:01 - 1.14
> +++ Makefile 21 Feb 2014 19:04:47 -
> @@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
> # $OpenBSD: Makefile,v 1.14 2014/01/19 20:21:01 bcallah Exp $
>
> -BROKEN-hppa =SIGILL compiling prg/s7c
> -
> V = 20140119
> COMMENT =high-level, extensible programming language
> DISTNAME = seed7_05_${V}
>
Re: Unbreak lang/seed7 on hppa
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 09:29:29PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 08:07:47PM +0100, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado > wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:32:58PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:51:06AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > > Is this instead a target dependency issue? If you do "make a b c" > > > > without > > > > Makefile dependencies between them, I don't think there's any guarantee > > > > that they will run in order. > > > > > > There isn't, indeed. > > > > > > make in "traditional non-parallel mode" will tend to run them in order, > > > as lots of people don't know how to use make so that things are a bit > > > friendlier, but I don't know if gmake does the same, and it's certainly > > > not guaranteed. > > > > > > > I've found where is the error. I had "MAKE_JOBS=2" in /etc/mk.conf. > > On my other machines, I have "PARALLEL_BUILD=NO" so I was not seeing the > > same error. > > Don't *ever* put MAKE_JOBS=2 in /etc/mk.conf > you're guaranteed to break things very badly. First error in one year and half :) . I will delete the variable from mk.conf. -- Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info
gnome & gdm auth style
Hi, I'm wondering if there is a way to set a different authentication style when login via GDM or in the screen locking of GNOME. In XDM, I can set it with the : format. In the same way, I can unlock my session with xlock via :. But it doesn't seem to work like that in GDM & GNOME. Any experiences with different authentication styles in GNOME? -- Mattieu Baptiste "/earth is 102% full ... please delete anyone you can."
Re: Unbreak lang/seed7 on hppa
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 08:07:47PM +0100, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:32:58PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:51:06AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > Is this instead a target dependency issue? If you do "make a b c" without > > > Makefile dependencies between them, I don't think there's any guarantee > > > that they will run in order. > > > > There isn't, indeed. > > > > make in "traditional non-parallel mode" will tend to run them in order, > > as lots of people don't know how to use make so that things are a bit > > friendlier, but I don't know if gmake does the same, and it's certainly > > not guaranteed. > > > > I've found where is the error. I had "MAKE_JOBS=2" in /etc/mk.conf. > On my other machines, I have "PARALLEL_BUILD=NO" so I was not seeing the > same error. Don't *ever* put MAKE_JOBS=2 in /etc/mk.conf you're guaranteed to break things very badly.
Re: Unbreak lang/seed7 on hppa
On 2/21/2014 2:07 PM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:32:58PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:51:06AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Is this instead a target dependency issue? If you do "make a b c" without
Makefile dependencies between them, I don't think there's any guarantee
that they will run in order.
There isn't, indeed.
make in "traditional non-parallel mode" will tend to run them in order,
as lots of people don't know how to use make so that things are a bit
friendlier, but I don't know if gmake does the same, and it's certainly
not guaranteed.
I've found where is the error. I had "MAKE_JOBS=2" in /etc/mk.conf.
On my other machines, I have "PARALLEL_BUILD=NO" so I was not seeing the
same error.
OK to unbreak the package on hppa? All tests pass.
It's OK for me, but since we're in lock you should probably get an OK
from someone else too.
~Brian
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /usr/cvsync/ports/lang/seed7/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -p -r1.14 Makefile
--- Makefile19 Jan 2014 20:21:01 - 1.14
+++ Makefile21 Feb 2014 19:04:47 -
@@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
# $OpenBSD: Makefile,v 1.14 2014/01/19 20:21:01 bcallah Exp $
-BROKEN-hppa = SIGILL compiling prg/s7c
-
V = 20140119
COMMENT = high-level, extensible programming language
DISTNAME =seed7_05_${V}
Re: Unbreak lang/seed7 on hppa
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:32:58PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:51:06AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > Is this instead a target dependency issue? If you do "make a b c" without
> > Makefile dependencies between them, I don't think there's any guarantee
> > that they will run in order.
>
> There isn't, indeed.
>
> make in "traditional non-parallel mode" will tend to run them in order,
> as lots of people don't know how to use make so that things are a bit
> friendlier, but I don't know if gmake does the same, and it's certainly
> not guaranteed.
>
I've found where is the error. I had "MAKE_JOBS=2" in /etc/mk.conf.
On my other machines, I have "PARALLEL_BUILD=NO" so I was not seeing the
same error.
OK to unbreak the package on hppa? All tests pass.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /usr/cvsync/ports/lang/seed7/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -p -r1.14 Makefile
--- Makefile19 Jan 2014 20:21:01 - 1.14
+++ Makefile21 Feb 2014 19:04:47 -
@@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
# $OpenBSD: Makefile,v 1.14 2014/01/19 20:21:01 bcallah Exp $
-BROKEN-hppa = SIGILL compiling prg/s7c
-
V =20140119
COMMENT = high-level, extensible programming language
DISTNAME = seed7_05_${V}
Re: Unbreak lang/seed7 on hppa
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:07:01PM -0500, Brian Callahan wrote:
> On 2/20/2014 4:29 PM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
> >Brian asked me to compile and to test the last version of seed7 on hppa.
> >The result is a little weird, so let me know if you have a better fix or
> >just give me the OKs.
> >
>
> So I'm assuming it builds correctly with this fix? But does it work?
Yes, "make package" and "make test" work fine.
>
> >Apparently gmake doesn't honor ALL_TARGET on hppa. I tried also running
> >directly "gmake -f makefile depend s7 s7c" within WRKSRC or removing
> >ALL_TARGET from the port makefile and adding "all: depend s7 s7c" to
> >WRKSRC/makefile". Nothing worked. gmake doesn't run "depend".
> >
>
> Blah. That is pretty crappy. I really hope there's a better fix.
>
> ~Brian
>
> >
> >Index: Makefile
> >===
> >RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/seed7/Makefile,v
> >retrieving revision 1.14
> >diff -u -p -r1.14 Makefile
> >--- Makefile 19 Jan 2014 20:21:01 - 1.14
> >+++ Makefile 20 Feb 2014 21:08:32 -
> >@@ -1,8 +1,7 @@
> > # $OpenBSD: Makefile,v 1.14 2014/01/19 20:21:01 bcallah Exp $
> >
> >-BROKEN-hppa = SIGILL compiling prg/s7c
> >-
> > V =20140119
> >+REVISION = 0
> > COMMENT = high-level, extensible programming language
> > DISTNAME = seed7_05_${V}
> > PKGNAME = seed7-${V}
> >@@ -26,7 +25,8 @@ MAKE_FLAGS = CC="${CC}" LDFLAGS="-Wl,--g
> > MAKE_ENV +=S7_LIB_DIR=${TRUEPREFIX}/lib/seed7/bin \
> > SEED7_LIBRARY=${TRUEPREFIX}/lib/seed7/lib
> > MAKE_FILE =makefile
> >-ALL_TARGET =depend s7 s7c
> >+# Surprisingly, ALL_TARGET doesn't work on HPPA.
> >+#ALL_TARGET = depend s7 s7c
> >
> > CFLAGS += -I${X11BASE}/include
> >
> >@@ -36,6 +36,12 @@ WRKSRC = ${WRKDIST}/src
> > post-patch:
> > perl -pi -e "s,-O2,${CFLAGS},g" ${WRKSRC}/makefile
> > perl -pi -e "s,/usr,${TRUEPREFIX},g" ${WRKDIST}/doc/s7{,c}.1
> >+
> >+do-build:
> >+cd ${WRKSRC} && \
> >+${SETENV} ${MAKE_ENV} ${MAKE_PROGRAM} ${MAKE_FLAGS} -f ${MAKE_FILE}
> >depend && \
> >+${SETENV} ${MAKE_ENV} ${MAKE_PROGRAM} ${MAKE_FLAGS} -f ${MAKE_FILE} s7
> >&& \
> >+${SETENV} ${MAKE_ENV} ${MAKE_PROGRAM} ${MAKE_FLAGS} -f ${MAKE_FILE} s7c
> >
> > do-install:
> > ${INSTALL_PROGRAM} ${WRKDIST}/bin/s7{,c} ${PREFIX}/bin
> >
>
--
Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info
Re: Unbreak lang/seed7 on hppa
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:51:06AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2014/02/20 23:07, Brian Callahan wrote:
> > >Apparently gmake doesn't honor ALL_TARGET on hppa. I tried also running
> > >directly "gmake -f makefile depend s7 s7c" within WRKSRC or removing
> > >ALL_TARGET from the port makefile and adding "all: depend s7 s7c" to
> > >WRKSRC/makefile". Nothing worked. gmake doesn't run "depend".
> > >
> >
> > Blah. That is pretty crappy. I really hope there's a better fix.
>
> ALL_TARGET is just passed on the make command line, I see no reason at
> all why that would fail to be honoured on hppa, I'd expect far more
> failures than just this.
>
> Is this instead a target dependency issue? If you do "make a b c" without
> Makefile dependencies between them, I don't think there's any guarantee
> that they will run in order.
>
> > >+do-build:
> > >+ cd ${WRKSRC} && \
> > >+ ${SETENV} ${MAKE_ENV} ${MAKE_PROGRAM} ${MAKE_FLAGS} -f ${MAKE_FILE}
> > >depend && \
> > >+ ${SETENV} ${MAKE_ENV} ${MAKE_PROGRAM} ${MAKE_FLAGS} -f ${MAKE_FILE} s7
> > >&& \
> > >+ ${SETENV} ${MAKE_ENV} ${MAKE_PROGRAM} ${MAKE_FLAGS} -f ${MAKE_FILE} s7c
>
> Running the depend stage in pre-build and "s7 s7c" in ALL_TARGETS may work
> and might be a bit nicer..
The last target fails:
gmake: ../bin/s7: Command not found
makefile:134: recipe for target '../prg/s7c' failed
gmake: *** [../prg/s7c] Error 127
gmake: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
--
Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info
Re: Unbreak lang/seed7 on hppa
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:51:06AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > Is this instead a target dependency issue? If you do "make a b c" without > Makefile dependencies between them, I don't think there's any guarantee > that they will run in order. There isn't, indeed. make in "traditional non-parallel mode" will tend to run them in order, as lots of people don't know how to use make so that things are a bit friendlier, but I don't know if gmake does the same, and it's certainly not guaranteed.
Re: Failed building uuid while building postgresql-server
On 2014/02/20 18:20, TimH wrote: > I installed local::lib via cpan before this. I always do as > there is no port. I think it's quite likely this is involved in the problem - perhaps cpan has upgraded a module from base. We could certainly have a look at a port for local::lib if you wanted to send one (preferably after unlock). In any event it's often less trouble to install something as a locally maintained port than from cpan, lower risk of it affecting something else in the system.
Re: Unbreak lang/seed7 on hppa
On 2014/02/20 23:07, Brian Callahan wrote:
> >Apparently gmake doesn't honor ALL_TARGET on hppa. I tried also running
> >directly "gmake -f makefile depend s7 s7c" within WRKSRC or removing
> >ALL_TARGET from the port makefile and adding "all: depend s7 s7c" to
> >WRKSRC/makefile". Nothing worked. gmake doesn't run "depend".
> >
>
> Blah. That is pretty crappy. I really hope there's a better fix.
ALL_TARGET is just passed on the make command line, I see no reason at
all why that would fail to be honoured on hppa, I'd expect far more
failures than just this.
Is this instead a target dependency issue? If you do "make a b c" without
Makefile dependencies between them, I don't think there's any guarantee
that they will run in order.
> >+do-build:
> >+cd ${WRKSRC} && \
> >+${SETENV} ${MAKE_ENV} ${MAKE_PROGRAM} ${MAKE_FLAGS} -f ${MAKE_FILE}
> >depend && \
> >+${SETENV} ${MAKE_ENV} ${MAKE_PROGRAM} ${MAKE_FLAGS} -f ${MAKE_FILE} s7
> >&& \
> >+${SETENV} ${MAKE_ENV} ${MAKE_PROGRAM} ${MAKE_FLAGS} -f ${MAKE_FILE} s7c
Running the depend stage in pre-build and "s7 s7c" in ALL_TARGETS may work
and might be a bit nicer..
