Re: mail/s-nail - question about updating it

[trondd]

On Thu, July 21, 2016 6:27 pm, J.A. Neitzel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a patch to update this port to the latest version ( v14.8.9
> ) against ports -current for 6.0 & running on -current for 6.0, but
> from the sound of it maybe it's too late.  Anyway, the version in
> the tree now ( v14.8.3 ) is outdated big time.
>
> I don't know where William ( william@ ) is, but I emailed this patch
> his way more than a day or two ago and have yet to receive a response.
>
> In any case, I have attached my patch to this message.
>

I had sent a diff to william@ for an update several weeks ago, as well. 
At the time I missed the PRIVSEP change and was going to follow up after
unlock.  I see you updated it.

Tim.

mail/s-nail - question about updating it

[J . A . Neitzel]

Hello,

I have a patch to update this port to the latest version ( v14.8.9
) against ports -current for 6.0 & running on -current for 6.0, but
from the sound of it maybe it's too late.  Anyway, the version in
the tree now ( v14.8.3 ) is outdated big time.

I don't know where William ( william@ ) is, but I emailed this patch
his way more than a day or two ago and have yet to receive a response.

In any case, I have attached my patch to this message.

Regards & Cheers,
Jeff

-- 
Jeffrey Allen Neitzel
Osh Project (V6Shell) - http://v6shell.org/
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/mail/s-nail/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -p -r1.12 Makefile
--- Makefile	14 Jul 2015 16:42:43 -	1.12
+++ Makefile	19 Jul 2016 01:54:12 -
@@ -2,17 +2,16 @@
 
 COMMENT=		enhanced, MIME capable Berkeley Mail
 
-DISTNAME=		s-nail-14.8.3
-DISTFILES=		${DISTNAME:S/./_/g}.tar.gz
+DISTNAME=		s-nail-14.8.9
 CATEGORIES=		mail
-HOMEPAGE=		http://sdaoden.users.sourceforge.net/code.html#s-nail
+HOMEPAGE=		https://www.sdaoden.eu/code.html
 
 # BSD
 PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM=	Yes
 
 WANTLIB += c crypto edit idn ssl termcap
 
-MASTER_SITES=		${MASTER_SITE_SOURCEFORGE:=s-nail/}
+MASTER_SITES=		https://www.sdaoden.eu/downloads/
 MAINTAINER=		William Yodlowsky 
 
 MODULES=		converters/libiconv
@@ -27,12 +26,12 @@ MAKE_FLAGS=		CC="${CC}" \
 			SYSCONFDIR="${SYSCONFDIR}" \
 			WANT_AUTOCC=0 \
 			WANT_EDITLINE=1 \
-			WANT_PRIVSEP=0
+			WANT_DOTLOCK=1
 MAKE_ENV=		VERBOSE=Yes
 
 LIB_DEPENDS=		devel/libidn
 
-INSTALL_TARGET=		packager-install
+INSTALL_TARGET=		doinstall
 
 post-install:
 	ln -sf ${TRUEPREFIX}/bin/s-nail ${PREFIX}/bin/nail
Index: distinfo
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/mail/s-nail/distinfo,v
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -p -r1.8 distinfo
--- distinfo	14 Jul 2015 16:42:43 -	1.8
+++ distinfo	19 Jul 2016 01:54:12 -
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-SHA256 (s-nail-14_8_3.tar.gz) = +E7dt9cK5D9ivr/Q8Mqe1SCWd53G74tHbGB67BpYDTQ=
-SIZE (s-nail-14_8_3.tar.gz) = 626811
+SHA256 (s-nail-14.8.9.tar.gz) = W3I4qnE686HWjcX5r+Ozu+MB5Am8yArtPvZSWxUP42M=
+SIZE (s-nail-14.8.9.tar.gz) = 590085
Index: patches/patch-nail_rc
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/mail/s-nail/patches/patch-nail_rc,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.4 patch-nail_rc
--- patches/patch-nail_rc	3 Jan 2015 18:00:47 -	1.4
+++ patches/patch-nail_rc	19 Jul 2016 01:54:12 -
@@ -1,8 +1,6 @@
-$OpenBSD: patch-nail_rc,v 1.4 2015/01/03 18:00:47 jca Exp $
-
 nail.rc.orig	Thu Dec 18 14:49:46 2014
-+++ nail.rc	Fri Jan  2 08:33:46 2015
-@@ -41,6 +41,9 @@ set ask
+--- nail.rc.orig	Tue Jun 21 12:24:21 2016
 nail.rc	Mon Jul 11 12:54:03 2016
+@@ -43,6 +43,9 @@
  # *header* on a per-folder basis (it is meaningless unless *header* is set)
  set bsdannounce
  
Index: pkg/PLIST
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/mail/s-nail/pkg/PLIST,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
diff -u -p -r1.1.1.1 PLIST
--- pkg/PLIST	29 Mar 2013 03:54:34 -	1.1.1.1
+++ pkg/PLIST	19 Jul 2016 01:54:12 -
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 @pkgpath mail/nail
 bin/nail
 @bin bin/s-nail
+@bin libexec/s-nail-privsep
 @man man/man1/s-nail.1
 share/examples/s-nail/
 share/examples/s-nail/s-nail.rc

Re: gvfs: re-enable fuse support

[Leo Unglaub]

Hey,

On 07/15/16 16:48, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:

I never said it was unacceptable at all. It's just going to be tricky to 
integrate this with graphical apps is all.
And anyway, it's way too late to come up with something for 6.0 so we have time 
to think about something.


i took a look at it and its not that trivial and very hacky. Maybe its 
not worth putting into this issue and start with a solution that works 
better anyways. Because gvfs-fuse was vey slow and buggy. (Not 
OpenBSD's fault, its simply not written that well)


Greetings
Leo

Munin-node listen only on ipv6 with "host *"

[Solène RAPENNE]

Hello,

On -current munin-node listens only on ipv6 addresses when using "host 
*", I have to use "host 127.0.0.1" to be able to use it from localhost 
on ipv4. I didn't change anything on munin configuration, I had no 
problem on 5.9.


my config file

log_level 4
log_file /var/log/munin/munin-node.log
pid_file /var/run/munin/munin-node.pid
background 1
setsid 1
user root
group wheel
ignore_file [\#~]$
ignore_file DEADJOE$
ignore_file \.bak$
ignore_file %$
ignore_file \.dpkg-(tmp|new|old|dist)$
ignore_file \.rpm(save|new)$
ignore_file \.pod$
allow ^127\.0\.0\.1$
allow ^::1$
host 127.0.0.1
port 4949


With "host *", there is only ipv6

fstat | grep 4949
root perl   552635* internet6 stream tcp 0x811db260 
*:4949


With "host 127.0.0.1"

fstat | grep 4949
root perl   132325* internet stream tcp 0x811db260 
127.0.0.1:4949



Is it something related to my system or somebody else can reproduce it ?

Regards

Re: Update www/chromium to v52

[Henrik Friedrichsen]

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 07:28:08AM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> No.

And if I extracted the diff that fixes this bug?

Re: Update www/chromium to v52

[Christian Weisgerber]

On 2016-07-20, Henrik Friedrichsen  wrote:

> Any chance this still gets in?

No.

-- 
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber  na...@mips.inka.de