Greetings,

We have already discussed this point (see e.g. [1]), but recently the QT4 subsystem got completely broken (at least, qucs-s GUI is now totally unusable: menus are messed up, no correspondence b/w component's symbols and names, empty pop-ups, ...)

Just to prove that it wasn't an issue of my system(s), I installed it in a brand new VM, seeing the same behavior.

In my opinion, keeping it into the tree doesn't make any sense (except if someone steps up to review what is going wrong, but that's not me: QT libraries are definitely beyond my skills...); and, considering that this port is the last surviving consumer for QT4, remaining pieces can be safely removed too.

All major Linux distributions and FreeBSD already removed both qucs (the parent project of this port) and QT4 since months; on the other hand, last commit in the official qucs-s tree is from Feb 2020, so it seems that there is low interest in evolving towards QT5, at least in the short run (qucs has a development branch almost compatible w/ QT5, so once ready, maybe qucs-s developers will find reasons to reconsider the transition).

Alternatives exist, too (xschem and kicad/eeschema come to mind, as I mentioned in my previous e-mail).

OK from maintainer if anyone wants to remove this port.

Cheers

[1]: https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=161168750901727&w=2

--
Alessandro De Laurenzis
[mailto:jus...@atlantide.mooo.com]
Web: http://www.atlantide.mooo.com
LinkedIn: http://it.linkedin.com/in/delaurenzis

Reply via email to