Re: Collision between libgfortran and gcc-libs

[Zé Loff]

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 08:55:24PM +1200, m...@extensibl.com wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 08:59:49 +0100
> Zé Loff  wrote:
> 
> > Not true, I just installed it without having lang/gfortran installed.
> 
> While spatstat does not depend directly on gfortran, its dependency,
> deldir, does. Did you compile deldir with g77? I think gfortran could
> be removed then.

Incidentally it was with g95 (I needed GCC 4.9 to compile some other
R packages) but yes, deldir was also installed as a dependency without
lang/gfortran.

Cheers
Zé

-- 

Re: Collision between libgfortran and gcc-libs

[ml]

On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 08:59:49 +0100
Zé Loff  wrote:

> Not true, I just installed it without having lang/gfortran installed.

While spatstat does not depend directly on gfortran, its dependency,
deldir, does. Did you compile deldir with g77? I think gfortran could
be removed then.

Re: Collision between libgfortran and gcc-libs

[Zé Loff]

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:26:46AM +1200, m...@extensibl.com wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 07:37:52PM +0200, David Coppa wrote:
> > 
> > +1 for nuking it from me too.
> > 
> > Ciao!
> > David
> > 
> > 
> I believe that spatstat module in R requires lang/gfortran to compile. Some 
> other useful modules depend on spatstat, e.g. radiomics.
>
> Please do not delete lang/gfortran, I am interested to fix it, if possible.

Not true, I just installed it without having lang/gfortran installed.

> Thanks,
> Alex
> 

-- 

Re: Collision between libgfortran and gcc-libs

[ml]

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 07:37:52PM +0200, David Coppa wrote:
> 
> +1 for nuking it from me too.
> 
> Ciao!
> David
> 
> 
I believe that spatstat module in R requires lang/gfortran to compile. Some 
other useful modules depend on spatstat, e.g. radiomics.

Please do not delete lang/gfortran, I am interested to fix it, if possible.

Thanks,
Alex

Re: Collision between libgfortran and gcc-libs

[David Coppa]

Il 12 luglio 2016 19:21:33 CEST, j...@wxcvbn.org ha scritto:

>Just like Qingshan I thought that lang/gfortran was the real deal.
>I should have looked closer.  Let's forget about the conflict.  sthen
>and you proposed to delete lang/gfortran: I think that's a good idea.

+1 for nuking it from me too.

Ciao!
David

Re: Collision between libgfortran and gcc-libs

[Jeremie Courreges-Anglas]

Tobias Ulmer  writes:

> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 01:16:48PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>> Qingshan Chen  writes:
>> 
>> > Sorry for the double posting here. The message was originally posted on
>> > m...@openbsd.org, and is being re-posted here, in the hope of reaching
>> > the right people.
>> >
>> >
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > It seems that gcc-libs-4.9.3p3 collides with libgfortran-4.3.1p16, which
>> > is required by gfortran-4.2.1p15. I have run into this issue a couple of
>> > times, when I tried to install various packages. The following message
>> > appeared when I tried to install gnucash, which requires
>> > webkit-2.4.9p4v1, which in turn requires gcc-libs-4.9.3p3:
>> >
>> > Collision in gcc-libs-4.9.3p3: the following files already exist
>> > /usr/local/lib/libgfortran.la (libgfortran-4.2.1p16 and
>> > gcc-libs-4.9.3p3)
>> > Can't install webkit-2.4.9p4v1: can't resolve gcc-libs-4.9.3p3
>> >
>> > I installed OpenBSD recently, on this Toshiba Satellite L505 laptop, and
>> > I have applied all the published security patches. Beyond that, I have
>> > no idea how to resolve this collision issue. I do need to keep this
>> > gfortran package on my system for my scientific research. Any
>> > suggestions will be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > Qingshan
>> 
>> gcc-libs is almost a requirement these days.  I hope that we can just
>> remove the .la from the gfortran package.  This should go in a bulk
>> build to ensure that nothing breaks.
>> 
>
> That solves the collision, but now you have libgfortran 2.0 and 6.0
> installed. gfortran will presumably pick up the newer library belonging
> to g95. That cant be a good thing.
>
> Qingshan: Anything stopping you from using the g95 package instead of
> gfortran?

Just like Qingshan I thought that lang/gfortran was the real deal.
I should have looked closer.  Let's forget about the conflict.  sthen
and you proposed to delete lang/gfortran: I think that's a good idea.

-- 
jca | PGP: 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF  DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE

Re: Collision between libgfortran and gcc-libs

[Qingshan Chen]

On 07/10/16 14:10, Qingshan Chen wrote:



On 07/10/16 01:00, Stuart Henderson wrote:

On 2016/07/09 15:47, Thomas Frohwein wrote:
On Friday, July 8, 2016 1:10 PM, Stuart Henderson 
 wrote:
Could we just get rid of gfortran? It seems that nothing in ports 
is using it..
Some R packages require gfortran to be built. I managed to install 
gfortran a few weeks ago by manually removing the gcc file that was 
colliding. However, the R package (I think it was knitr) required a 
newer version of gfortran, so I had to make do without that package.
The newer version of gfortran is in the g95 package, the executable 
is called egfortran.




This is interesting. I was confused at first. There is a G95 project, 
which is not part of GNU GCC project, but aims to produce a modern 
high quality Fortran compiler. G95 has quite some followers. See 
www.g95.org


As you mentioned, the executable of the g95 package is egfortran. The 
output of 'egfortran -v' does suggest that it is a newer version of 
the GCC Fortran compiler. In this case, I am not against removing the 
older gfortran package, though I am a little worried that the mismatch 
between the versions of gcc and gfortran might cause problems in some 
situations.


I take back my last sentence. A newer version of gcc, matching 
egfortran, is also available, and it is called egcc.

Re: Collision between libgfortran and gcc-libs

[Qingshan Chen]

On 07/10/16 01:00, Stuart Henderson wrote:

On 2016/07/09 15:47, Thomas Frohwein wrote:

On Friday, July 8, 2016 1:10 PM, Stuart Henderson  wrote:

Could we just get rid of gfortran? It seems that nothing in ports is using it..

Some R packages require gfortran to be built. I managed to install gfortran a 
few weeks ago by manually removing the gcc file that was colliding. However, 
the R package (I think it was knitr) required a newer version of gfortran, so I 
had to make do without that package.

The newer version of gfortran is in the g95 package, the executable is called 
egfortran.



This is interesting. I was confused at first. There is a G95 project, 
which is not part of GNU GCC project, but aims to produce a modern high 
quality Fortran compiler. G95 has quite some followers. See www.g95.org


As you mentioned, the executable of the g95 package is egfortran. The 
output of 'egfortran -v' does suggest that it is a newer version of the 
GCC Fortran compiler. In this case, I am not against removing the older 
gfortran package, though I am a little worried that the mismatch between 
the versions of gcc and gfortran might cause problems in some situations.

Re: Collision between libgfortran and gcc-libs

[Stuart Henderson]

On 2016/07/09 15:47, Thomas Frohwein wrote:
> > On Friday, July 8, 2016 1:10 PM, Stuart Henderson  
> > wrote:
> 
> > > Could we just get rid of gfortran? It seems that nothing in ports is 
> > > using it..
> > 
> 
> Some R packages require gfortran to be built. I managed to install gfortran a 
> few weeks ago by manually removing the gcc file that was colliding. However, 
> the R package (I think it was knitr) required a newer version of gfortran, so 
> I had to make do without that package.

The newer version of gfortran is in the g95 package, the executable is called 
egfortran.

Re: Collision between libgfortran and gcc-libs

[Thomas Frohwein]

> On Friday, July 8, 2016 1:10 PM, Stuart Henderson  
> wrote:

> > Could we just get rid of gfortran? It seems that nothing in ports is using 
> > it..
> 

Some R packages require gfortran to be built. I managed to install gfortran a 
few weeks ago by manually removing the gcc file that was colliding. However, 
the R package (I think it was knitr) required a newer version of gfortran, so I 
had to make do without that package.

> 
> 
> On 2016/07/07 13:16, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>>  Qingshan Chen  writes:
>> 
>>  > Sorry for the double posting here. The message was originally posted 
> on
>>  > m...@openbsd.org, and is being re-posted here, in the hope of reaching
>>  > the right people.
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > Hi All,
>>  >
>>  > It seems that gcc-libs-4.9.3p3 collides with libgfortran-4.3.1p16, 
> which
>>  > is required by gfortran-4.2.1p15. I have run into this issue a couple 
> of
>>  > times, when I tried to install various packages. The following message
>>  > appeared when I tried to install gnucash, which requires
>>  > webkit-2.4.9p4v1, which in turn requires gcc-libs-4.9.3p3:
>>  >
>>  > Collision in gcc-libs-4.9.3p3: the following files already exist
>>  > /usr/local/lib/libgfortran.la (libgfortran-4.2.1p16 and
>>  > gcc-libs-4.9.3p3)
>>  > Can't install webkit-2.4.9p4v1: can't resolve gcc-libs-4.9.3p3
>>  >
>>  > I installed OpenBSD recently, on this Toshiba Satellite L505 laptop, 
> and
>>  > I have applied all the published security patches. Beyond that, I have
>>  > no idea how to resolve this collision issue. I do need to keep this
>>  > gfortran package on my system for my scientific research. Any
>>  > suggestions will be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
>>  >
>>  > Best,
>>  > Qingshan
>> 
>>  gcc-libs is almost a requirement these days.  I hope that we can just
>>  remove the .la from the gfortran package.  This should go in a bulk
>>  build to ensure that nothing breaks.
>> 
>>  (Diff not tested)
>> 
>>  Index: Makefile
>>  ===
>>  RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/gfortran/Makefile,v
>>  retrieving revision 1.35
>>  diff -u -p -r1.35 Makefile
>>  --- Makefile12 May 2016 01:17:13 -1.35
>>  +++ Makefile7 Jul 2016 11:10:00 -
>>  @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ PKGNAME-lib =libgfortran-$V
>>   SHARED_LIBS =gfortran2.0
>>   
>>   REVISION = 16
>>  -REVISION-lib = 18
>>  +REVISION-lib = 19
>>   
>>   CATEGORIES =lang math
>>   
>>  @@ -108,5 +108,6 @@ post-install:
>>   ln -sf /usr/lib/gcc-lib/${CONFIG}/${SYSV}/libgcc.a 
> ${PREFIX}/lib/gcc/${CONFIG}/$V/libgcc.a
>>   ln -sf /usr/lib/gcc-lib/${CONFIG}/${SYSV}/cc1 
> ${PREFIX}/libexec/gcc/${CONFIG}/$V/cc1
>>   ${INSTALL_MAN} ${WRKBUILD}/gcc/doc/gfortran.1 
> ${PREFIX}/man/man1/gfortran.1
>>  +rm ${PREFIX}/lib/libgfortran.la
>>   
>>   .include 
>>  Index: pkg/PLIST-lib
>>  ===
>>  RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/gfortran/pkg/PLIST-lib,v
>>  retrieving revision 1.3
>>  diff -u -p -r1.3 PLIST-lib
>>  --- pkg/PLIST-lib19 Mar 2015 20:25:26 -1.3
>>  +++ pkg/PLIST-lib7 Jul 2016 11:09:10 -
>>  @@ -6,6 +6,5 @@ lib/gcc/${CONFIG}/${V}/
>>   lib/gcc/${CONFIG}/${V}/libgfortranbegin.a
>>   lib/gcc/${CONFIG}/${V}/libgfortranbegin.la
>>   lib/libgfortran.a
>>  -lib/libgfortran.la
>>   @lib lib/libgfortran.so.${LIBgfortran_VERSION}
>>   %%PIC%%
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  -- 
>>  jca | PGP: 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF  DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
>> 
> 

Re: Collision between libgfortran and gcc-libs

[Tobias Ulmer]

On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 01:16:48PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> Qingshan Chen  writes:
> 
> > Sorry for the double posting here. The message was originally posted on
> > m...@openbsd.org, and is being re-posted here, in the hope of reaching
> > the right people.
> >
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > It seems that gcc-libs-4.9.3p3 collides with libgfortran-4.3.1p16, which
> > is required by gfortran-4.2.1p15. I have run into this issue a couple of
> > times, when I tried to install various packages. The following message
> > appeared when I tried to install gnucash, which requires
> > webkit-2.4.9p4v1, which in turn requires gcc-libs-4.9.3p3:
> >
> > Collision in gcc-libs-4.9.3p3: the following files already exist
> > /usr/local/lib/libgfortran.la (libgfortran-4.2.1p16 and
> > gcc-libs-4.9.3p3)
> > Can't install webkit-2.4.9p4v1: can't resolve gcc-libs-4.9.3p3
> >
> > I installed OpenBSD recently, on this Toshiba Satellite L505 laptop, and
> > I have applied all the published security patches. Beyond that, I have
> > no idea how to resolve this collision issue. I do need to keep this
> > gfortran package on my system for my scientific research. Any
> > suggestions will be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
> >
> > Best,
> > Qingshan
> 
> gcc-libs is almost a requirement these days.  I hope that we can just
> remove the .la from the gfortran package.  This should go in a bulk
> build to ensure that nothing breaks.
> 

That solves the collision, but now you have libgfortran 2.0 and 6.0
installed. gfortran will presumably pick up the newer library belonging
to g95. That cant be a good thing.

Qingshan: Anything stopping you from using the g95 package instead of
gfortran?

Re: Collision between libgfortran and gcc-libs

[Jeremie Courreges-Anglas]

Stuart Henderson  writes:

> Could we just get rid of gfortran? It seems that nothing in ports is using 
> it..

I understand your point, but except for PLIST changes for releases,
gfortran doesn't seem to add much maintenance overhead.  And, as
mentioned by the OP, there are still people using it.  Given the number
of files in patches/, it doesn't look like something that could be
easily installed locally. :(

I still propose that we try to resolve that conflict, diff (tested since
first submission) below for convenience.  Since you mention that nothing
in ports uses it (I should have checked earlier), ok?

Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/gfortran/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.35
diff -u -p -r1.35 Makefile
--- Makefile12 May 2016 01:17:13 -  1.35
+++ Makefile7 Jul 2016 11:10:00 -
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ PKGNAME-lib = libgfortran-$V
 SHARED_LIBS =  gfortran2.0
 
 REVISION = 16
-REVISION-lib = 18
+REVISION-lib = 19
 
 CATEGORIES =   lang math
 
@@ -108,5 +108,6 @@ post-install:
ln -sf /usr/lib/gcc-lib/${CONFIG}/${SYSV}/libgcc.a 
${PREFIX}/lib/gcc/${CONFIG}/$V/libgcc.a
ln -sf /usr/lib/gcc-lib/${CONFIG}/${SYSV}/cc1 
${PREFIX}/libexec/gcc/${CONFIG}/$V/cc1
${INSTALL_MAN} ${WRKBUILD}/gcc/doc/gfortran.1 
${PREFIX}/man/man1/gfortran.1
+   rm ${PREFIX}/lib/libgfortran.la
 
 .include 
Index: pkg/PLIST-lib
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/gfortran/pkg/PLIST-lib,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -p -r1.3 PLIST-lib
--- pkg/PLIST-lib   19 Mar 2015 20:25:26 -  1.3
+++ pkg/PLIST-lib   7 Jul 2016 11:09:10 -
@@ -6,6 +6,5 @@ lib/gcc/${CONFIG}/${V}/
 lib/gcc/${CONFIG}/${V}/libgfortranbegin.a
 lib/gcc/${CONFIG}/${V}/libgfortranbegin.la
 lib/libgfortran.a
-lib/libgfortran.la
 @lib lib/libgfortran.so.${LIBgfortran_VERSION}
 %%PIC%%


> On 2016/07/07 13:16, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>> Qingshan Chen  writes:
>> 
>> > Sorry for the double posting here. The message was originally posted on
>> > m...@openbsd.org, and is being re-posted here, in the hope of reaching
>> > the right people.
>> >
>> >
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > It seems that gcc-libs-4.9.3p3 collides with libgfortran-4.3.1p16, which
>> > is required by gfortran-4.2.1p15. I have run into this issue a couple of
>> > times, when I tried to install various packages. The following message
>> > appeared when I tried to install gnucash, which requires
>> > webkit-2.4.9p4v1, which in turn requires gcc-libs-4.9.3p3:
>> >
>> > Collision in gcc-libs-4.9.3p3: the following files already exist
>> > /usr/local/lib/libgfortran.la (libgfortran-4.2.1p16 and
>> > gcc-libs-4.9.3p3)
>> > Can't install webkit-2.4.9p4v1: can't resolve gcc-libs-4.9.3p3
>> >
>> > I installed OpenBSD recently, on this Toshiba Satellite L505 laptop, and
>> > I have applied all the published security patches. Beyond that, I have
>> > no idea how to resolve this collision issue. I do need to keep this
>> > gfortran package on my system for my scientific research. Any
>> > suggestions will be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > Qingshan
>> 
>> gcc-libs is almost a requirement these days.  I hope that we can just
>> remove the .la from the gfortran package.  This should go in a bulk
>> build to ensure that nothing breaks.
>> 
>> (Diff not tested)
>> 
>> Index: Makefile
>> ===
>> RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/gfortran/Makefile,v
>> retrieving revision 1.35
>> diff -u -p -r1.35 Makefile
>> --- Makefile 12 May 2016 01:17:13 -  1.35
>> +++ Makefile 7 Jul 2016 11:10:00 -
>> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ PKGNAME-lib =  libgfortran-$V
>>  SHARED_LIBS =   gfortran2.0
>>  
>>  REVISION = 16
>> -REVISION-lib = 18
>> +REVISION-lib = 19
>>  
>>  CATEGORIES =lang math
>>  
>> @@ -108,5 +108,6 @@ post-install:
>>  ln -sf /usr/lib/gcc-lib/${CONFIG}/${SYSV}/libgcc.a 
>> ${PREFIX}/lib/gcc/${CONFIG}/$V/libgcc.a
>>  ln -sf /usr/lib/gcc-lib/${CONFIG}/${SYSV}/cc1 
>> ${PREFIX}/libexec/gcc/${CONFIG}/$V/cc1
>>  ${INSTALL_MAN} ${WRKBUILD}/gcc/doc/gfortran.1 
>> ${PREFIX}/man/man1/gfortran.1
>> +rm ${PREFIX}/lib/libgfortran.la
>>  
>>  .include 
>> Index: pkg/PLIST-lib
>> ===
>> RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/gfortran/pkg/PLIST-lib,v
>> retrieving revision 1.3
>> diff -u -p -r1.3 PLIST-lib
>> --- pkg/PLIST-lib19 Mar 2015 20:25:26 -  1.3
>> +++ pkg/PLIST-lib7 Jul 2016 11:09:10 -
>> @@ -6,6 +6,5 @@ lib/gcc/${CONFIG}/${V}/
>>  lib/gcc/${CONFIG}/${V}/libgfortranbegin.a
>>  lib/gcc/${CONFIG}/${V}/libgfortranbegin.la
>>  lib/libgfortran.a
>> -lib/libgfortran.la
>>  @lib lib/libgfortran.so.${LIBgfortran_VERSION}
>>  %%PIC%%
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> jca | PGP: 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF  

Re: Collision between libgfortran and gcc-libs

[Stuart Henderson]

Could we just get rid of gfortran? It seems that nothing in ports is using it..


On 2016/07/07 13:16, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> Qingshan Chen  writes:
> 
> > Sorry for the double posting here. The message was originally posted on
> > m...@openbsd.org, and is being re-posted here, in the hope of reaching
> > the right people.
> >
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > It seems that gcc-libs-4.9.3p3 collides with libgfortran-4.3.1p16, which
> > is required by gfortran-4.2.1p15. I have run into this issue a couple of
> > times, when I tried to install various packages. The following message
> > appeared when I tried to install gnucash, which requires
> > webkit-2.4.9p4v1, which in turn requires gcc-libs-4.9.3p3:
> >
> > Collision in gcc-libs-4.9.3p3: the following files already exist
> > /usr/local/lib/libgfortran.la (libgfortran-4.2.1p16 and
> > gcc-libs-4.9.3p3)
> > Can't install webkit-2.4.9p4v1: can't resolve gcc-libs-4.9.3p3
> >
> > I installed OpenBSD recently, on this Toshiba Satellite L505 laptop, and
> > I have applied all the published security patches. Beyond that, I have
> > no idea how to resolve this collision issue. I do need to keep this
> > gfortran package on my system for my scientific research. Any
> > suggestions will be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
> >
> > Best,
> > Qingshan
> 
> gcc-libs is almost a requirement these days.  I hope that we can just
> remove the .la from the gfortran package.  This should go in a bulk
> build to ensure that nothing breaks.
> 
> (Diff not tested)
> 
> Index: Makefile
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/gfortran/Makefile,v
> retrieving revision 1.35
> diff -u -p -r1.35 Makefile
> --- Makefile  12 May 2016 01:17:13 -  1.35
> +++ Makefile  7 Jul 2016 11:10:00 -
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ PKGNAME-lib =   libgfortran-$V
>  SHARED_LIBS =gfortran2.0
>  
>  REVISION = 16
> -REVISION-lib = 18
> +REVISION-lib = 19
>  
>  CATEGORIES = lang math
>  
> @@ -108,5 +108,6 @@ post-install:
>   ln -sf /usr/lib/gcc-lib/${CONFIG}/${SYSV}/libgcc.a 
> ${PREFIX}/lib/gcc/${CONFIG}/$V/libgcc.a
>   ln -sf /usr/lib/gcc-lib/${CONFIG}/${SYSV}/cc1 
> ${PREFIX}/libexec/gcc/${CONFIG}/$V/cc1
>   ${INSTALL_MAN} ${WRKBUILD}/gcc/doc/gfortran.1 
> ${PREFIX}/man/man1/gfortran.1
> + rm ${PREFIX}/lib/libgfortran.la
>  
>  .include 
> Index: pkg/PLIST-lib
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/gfortran/pkg/PLIST-lib,v
> retrieving revision 1.3
> diff -u -p -r1.3 PLIST-lib
> --- pkg/PLIST-lib 19 Mar 2015 20:25:26 -  1.3
> +++ pkg/PLIST-lib 7 Jul 2016 11:09:10 -
> @@ -6,6 +6,5 @@ lib/gcc/${CONFIG}/${V}/
>  lib/gcc/${CONFIG}/${V}/libgfortranbegin.a
>  lib/gcc/${CONFIG}/${V}/libgfortranbegin.la
>  lib/libgfortran.a
> -lib/libgfortran.la
>  @lib lib/libgfortran.so.${LIBgfortran_VERSION}
>  %%PIC%%
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> jca | PGP: 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF  DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
> 

Re: Collision between libgfortran and gcc-libs

[Jeremie Courreges-Anglas]

Qingshan Chen  writes:

> Sorry for the double posting here. The message was originally posted on
> m...@openbsd.org, and is being re-posted here, in the hope of reaching
> the right people.
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> It seems that gcc-libs-4.9.3p3 collides with libgfortran-4.3.1p16, which
> is required by gfortran-4.2.1p15. I have run into this issue a couple of
> times, when I tried to install various packages. The following message
> appeared when I tried to install gnucash, which requires
> webkit-2.4.9p4v1, which in turn requires gcc-libs-4.9.3p3:
>
> Collision in gcc-libs-4.9.3p3: the following files already exist
> /usr/local/lib/libgfortran.la (libgfortran-4.2.1p16 and
> gcc-libs-4.9.3p3)
> Can't install webkit-2.4.9p4v1: can't resolve gcc-libs-4.9.3p3
>
> I installed OpenBSD recently, on this Toshiba Satellite L505 laptop, and
> I have applied all the published security patches. Beyond that, I have
> no idea how to resolve this collision issue. I do need to keep this
> gfortran package on my system for my scientific research. Any
> suggestions will be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
>
> Best,
> Qingshan

gcc-libs is almost a requirement these days.  I hope that we can just
remove the .la from the gfortran package.  This should go in a bulk
build to ensure that nothing breaks.

(Diff not tested)

Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/gfortran/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.35
diff -u -p -r1.35 Makefile
--- Makefile12 May 2016 01:17:13 -  1.35
+++ Makefile7 Jul 2016 11:10:00 -
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ PKGNAME-lib = libgfortran-$V
 SHARED_LIBS =  gfortran2.0
 
 REVISION = 16
-REVISION-lib = 18
+REVISION-lib = 19
 
 CATEGORIES =   lang math
 
@@ -108,5 +108,6 @@ post-install:
ln -sf /usr/lib/gcc-lib/${CONFIG}/${SYSV}/libgcc.a 
${PREFIX}/lib/gcc/${CONFIG}/$V/libgcc.a
ln -sf /usr/lib/gcc-lib/${CONFIG}/${SYSV}/cc1 
${PREFIX}/libexec/gcc/${CONFIG}/$V/cc1
${INSTALL_MAN} ${WRKBUILD}/gcc/doc/gfortran.1 
${PREFIX}/man/man1/gfortran.1
+   rm ${PREFIX}/lib/libgfortran.la
 
 .include 
Index: pkg/PLIST-lib
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/gfortran/pkg/PLIST-lib,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -p -r1.3 PLIST-lib
--- pkg/PLIST-lib   19 Mar 2015 20:25:26 -  1.3
+++ pkg/PLIST-lib   7 Jul 2016 11:09:10 -
@@ -6,6 +6,5 @@ lib/gcc/${CONFIG}/${V}/
 lib/gcc/${CONFIG}/${V}/libgfortranbegin.a
 lib/gcc/${CONFIG}/${V}/libgfortranbegin.la
 lib/libgfortran.a
-lib/libgfortran.la
 @lib lib/libgfortran.so.${LIBgfortran_VERSION}
 %%PIC%%



-- 
jca | PGP: 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF  DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE

Collision between libgfortran and gcc-libs

[Qingshan Chen]

Sorry for the double posting here. The message was originally posted on 
m...@openbsd.org, and is being re-posted here, in the hope of reaching 
the right people.



Hi All,

It seems that gcc-libs-4.9.3p3 collides with libgfortran-4.3.1p16, which 
is required by gfortran-4.2.1p15. I have run into this issue a couple of 
times, when I tried to install various packages. The following message 
appeared when I tried to install gnucash, which requires 
webkit-2.4.9p4v1, which in turn requires gcc-libs-4.9.3p3:


Collision in gcc-libs-4.9.3p3: the following files already exist
/usr/local/lib/libgfortran.la (libgfortran-4.2.1p16 and 
gcc-libs-4.9.3p3)

Can't install webkit-2.4.9p4v1: can't resolve gcc-libs-4.9.3p3

I installed OpenBSD recently, on this Toshiba Satellite L505 laptop, and 
I have applied all the published security patches. Beyond that, I have 
no idea how to resolve this collision issue. I do need to keep this 
gfortran package on my system for my scientific research. Any 
suggestions will be greatly appreciated. Thanks!


Best,
Qingshan