Re: Force NO_CCACHE for gcc4.port.mk and clang.port.mk
2013/11/28 Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado i...@juanfra.info:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:00:29PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/11/27 23:56, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 07:38:32PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/11/27 22:53, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
Why not add support for ports-gcc/clang?. The symlinks only works
with
base-gcc but ccache can work with any compiler using
CCACHE_CC=mycompiler. I think a script in ${WRKDIR}/bin with
CCACHE_CC=mycompiler ccache $@ inside or something similar should
be
enough.
Won't work for more than one language: either C or C++, but not both.
something like (untested)
.if !empty(_MODGCC4_LINKS)
. for _src _dest in ${_MODGCC4_LINKS}
.if ${USE_CCACHE:L} == yes
printf '#!/bin/sh\nexec CCACHE_CC=${_src} ccache $@\n'
${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest}
chmod +x ${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest}
.else
MODGCC4_post-patch += ln -sf ${LOCALBASE}/bin/${_src}
${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest};
.endif
. endfor
.endif
*** Parse error in /usr/ports/www/webkit: Need an operator in '''
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:81)
*** Parse error: Need an operator in '/bin/gcc'
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:82)
*** Parse error: Need an operator in '''
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:81)
*** Parse error: Need an operator in '/bin/cc'
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:82)
*** Parse error: Need an operator in '''
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:81)
*** Parse error: Need an operator in '/bin/g++'
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:82)
*** Parse error: Need an operator in '''
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:81)
*** Parse error: Need an operator in '/bin/c++'
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:82)
Line 81 is the printf.
--
Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info
Oh yes, that needs some MODGCC4_post-patch +=
MODGCC4_post-patch += printf '#!/bin/sh\nexec CCACHE_CC=${_src} ccache
$@\n' ${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest}
MODGCC4_post-patch += chmod +x ${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest}
or
MODGCC4_post-patch += printf '#!/bin/sh\nexec CCACHE_CC=${_src} ccache
$@\n' ${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest}; chmod +x ${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest}
These lines don't work. Webkit uses ccache with system-gcc.
I had success with x11/vlc, Clang and the following patch.
If the idea is welcome, I can do and run more changes/tests.
--
WBR,
Vadim Zhukov
Index: lang/clang/clang.port.mk
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/clang/clang.port.mk,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.6 clang.port.mk
--- lang/clang/clang.port.mk27 Nov 2013 20:42:08 - 1.6
+++ lang/clang/clang.port.mk28 Nov 2013 17:46:11 -
@@ -29,21 +29,29 @@ _MODCLANG_ARCH_USES = Yes
_MODCLANG_LINKS =
.if ${_MODCLANG_ARCH_USES:L} == yes
-# not supported for all languages Clang supports
-NO_CCACHE =Yes
BUILD_DEPENDS += devel/llvm=${MODCLANG_VERSION}
_MODCLANG_LINKS = clang gcc clang cc
-.if ${MODCLANG_LANGS:L:Mc++}
+. if ${MODCLANG_LANGS:L:Mc++}
_MODCLANG_LINKS += clang++ g++ clang++ c++
-.endif
+. endif
.endif
.if !empty(_MODCLANG_LINKS)
-. for _src _dest in ${_MODCLANG_LINKS}
+. if ${USE_CCACHE:L} == yes ${NO_CCACHE:L} != yes
+.for _src _dest in ${_MODCLANG_LINKS}
+MODCLANG_post-patch += rm -f ${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest};
+MODCLANG_post-patch += echo '\#!/bin/sh' ${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest};
+MODCLANG_post-patch += echo exec ccache ${LOCALBASE}/bin/${_src} \\$$@\
+MODCLANG_post-patch += ${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest};
+MODCLANG_post-patch += chmod +x ${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest};
+.endfor
+. else
+.for _src _dest in ${_MODCLANG_LINKS}
MODCLANG_post-patch += ln -sf ${LOCALBASE}/bin/${_src} ${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest};
-. endfor
+.endfor
+. endif
.endif
SUBST_VARS+= MODCLANG_VERSION
Re: Force NO_CCACHE for gcc4.port.mk and clang.port.mk
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 09:48:59PM +0400, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
2013/11/28 Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado i...@juanfra.info:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:00:29PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/11/27 23:56, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 07:38:32PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/11/27 22:53, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
Why not add support for ports-gcc/clang?. The symlinks only works
with
base-gcc but ccache can work with any compiler using
CCACHE_CC=mycompiler. I think a script in ${WRKDIR}/bin with
CCACHE_CC=mycompiler ccache $@ inside or something similar
should be
enough.
Won't work for more than one language: either C or C++, but not both.
something like (untested)
.if !empty(_MODGCC4_LINKS)
. for _src _dest in ${_MODGCC4_LINKS}
.if ${USE_CCACHE:L} == yes
printf '#!/bin/sh\nexec CCACHE_CC=${_src} ccache $@\n'
${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest}
chmod +x ${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest}
.else
MODGCC4_post-patch += ln -sf ${LOCALBASE}/bin/${_src}
${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest};
.endif
. endfor
.endif
*** Parse error in /usr/ports/www/webkit: Need an operator in '''
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:81)
*** Parse error: Need an operator in '/bin/gcc'
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:82)
*** Parse error: Need an operator in '''
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:81)
*** Parse error: Need an operator in '/bin/cc'
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:82)
*** Parse error: Need an operator in '''
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:81)
*** Parse error: Need an operator in '/bin/g++'
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:82)
*** Parse error: Need an operator in '''
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:81)
*** Parse error: Need an operator in '/bin/c++'
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:82)
Line 81 is the printf.
--
Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info
Oh yes, that needs some MODGCC4_post-patch +=
MODGCC4_post-patch += printf '#!/bin/sh\nexec CCACHE_CC=${_src} ccache
$@\n' ${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest}
MODGCC4_post-patch += chmod +x ${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest}
or
MODGCC4_post-patch += printf '#!/bin/sh\nexec CCACHE_CC=${_src} ccache
$@\n' ${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest}; chmod +x ${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest}
These lines don't work. Webkit uses ccache with system-gcc.
I had success with x11/vlc, Clang and the following patch.
If the idea is welcome, I can do and run more changes/tests.
OK to the patch. Works for me.
The same changes within gcc4.port.mk doesn't work. I can't find where is
the problem :(
--
WBR,
Vadim Zhukov
Index: lang/clang/clang.port.mk
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/clang/clang.port.mk,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.6 clang.port.mk
--- lang/clang/clang.port.mk 27 Nov 2013 20:42:08 - 1.6
+++ lang/clang/clang.port.mk 28 Nov 2013 17:46:11 -
@@ -29,21 +29,29 @@ _MODCLANG_ARCH_USES = Yes
_MODCLANG_LINKS =
.if ${_MODCLANG_ARCH_USES:L} == yes
-# not supported for all languages Clang supports
-NO_CCACHE = Yes
BUILD_DEPENDS += devel/llvm=${MODCLANG_VERSION}
_MODCLANG_LINKS = clang gcc clang cc
-.if ${MODCLANG_LANGS:L:Mc++}
+. if ${MODCLANG_LANGS:L:Mc++}
_MODCLANG_LINKS += clang++ g++ clang++ c++
-.endif
+. endif
.endif
.if !empty(_MODCLANG_LINKS)
-. for _src _dest in ${_MODCLANG_LINKS}
+. if ${USE_CCACHE:L} == yes ${NO_CCACHE:L} != yes
+.for _src _dest in ${_MODCLANG_LINKS}
+MODCLANG_post-patch += rm -f ${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest};
+MODCLANG_post-patch += echo '\#!/bin/sh' ${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest};
+MODCLANG_post-patch += echo exec ccache ${LOCALBASE}/bin/${_src}
\\$$@\
+MODCLANG_post-patch += ${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest};
+MODCLANG_post-patch += chmod +x ${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest};
+.endfor
+. else
+.for _src _dest in ${_MODCLANG_LINKS}
MODCLANG_post-patch += ln -sf ${LOCALBASE}/bin/${_src}
${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest};
-. endfor
+.endfor
+. endif
.endif
SUBST_VARS+= MODCLANG_VERSION
--
Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info
Re: Force NO_CCACHE for gcc4.port.mk and clang.port.mk
CCache won't work for non-base C/C++ compilers, so don't even try
to do it. Okays, objections?
Oops, better version for GCC 4.8.
--
zhuk@
Index: clang/clang.port.mk
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/clang/clang.port.mk,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -p -r1.5 clang.port.mk
--- clang/clang.port.mk 21 Jun 2013 23:00:30 - 1.5
+++ clang/clang.port.mk 27 Nov 2013 09:06:25 -
@@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ _MODCLANG_ARCH_USES = Yes
_MODCLANG_LINKS =
.if ${_MODCLANG_ARCH_USES:L} == yes
+# not supported for all languages Clang supports
+NO_CCACHE =Yes
BUILD_DEPENDS += devel/llvm=${MODCLANG_VERSION}
_MODCLANG_LINKS = clang gcc clang cc
Index: gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk,v
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -p -r1.9 gcc4.port.mk
--- gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk18 Apr 2012 18:41:22 - 1.9
+++ gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk27 Nov 2013 09:06:25 -
@@ -35,6 +35,9 @@ _MODGCC4_LINKS =
. if ${MODGCC4_LANGS:L:Mc}
BUILD_DEPENDS += lang/gcc/4.6=4.6,4.7
_MODGCC4_LINKS += egcc gcc egcc cc
+
+# not supported
+NO_CCACHE =Yes
. endif
. if ${MODGCC4_LANGS:L:Mc++}
@@ -45,6 +48,9 @@ LIB_DEPENDS += ${MODGCC4_CPPLIBDEP}
MODGCC4_CPPWANTLIB = estdc++=14
WANTLIB += ${MODGCC4_CPPWANTLIB}
_MODGCC4_LINKS += eg++ g++ eg++ c++
+
+# not supported
+NO_CCACHE =Yes
. endif
. if ${MODGCC4_LANGS:L:Mfortran}
Index: gcc/4.8/gcc4.port.mk
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/gcc/4.8/gcc4.port.mk,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
diff -u -p -r1.1.1.1 gcc4.port.mk
--- gcc/4.8/gcc4.port.mk8 Apr 2013 08:20:19 - 1.1.1.1
+++ gcc/4.8/gcc4.port.mk27 Nov 2013 09:06:25 -
@@ -35,6 +35,9 @@ _MODGCC4_LINKS =
. if ${MODGCC4_LANGS:L:Mc}
BUILD_DEPENDS += lang/gcc/4.8=4.8,4.9
_MODGCC4_LINKS += egcc gcc egcc cc
+
+# not supported
+NO_CCACHE =Yes
. endif
. if ${MODGCC4_LANGS:L:Mc++}
@@ -45,6 +48,9 @@ LIB_DEPENDS += ${MODGCC4_CPPLIBDEP}
MODGCC4_CPPWANTLIB = estdc++=16
WANTLIB += ${MODGCC4_CPPWANTLIB}
_MODGCC4_LINKS += eg++ g++ eg++ c++
+
+# not supported
+NO_CCACHE =Yes
. endif
. if ${MODGCC4_LANGS:L:Mfortran}
Re: Force NO_CCACHE for gcc4.port.mk and clang.port.mk
On 2013/11/27 13:05, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
CCache won't work for non-base C/C++ compilers, so don't even try
to do it. Okays, objections?
--
zhuk@
Ok for now, though in those cases you might want to investigate setting
CC/CXX to ccache egcc, etc. I didn't use that method for the general
case as I was worried about quoting issues e.g. MAKE_FLAGS= CC=${CC}
but this might be manageable if it's just for ports using non-base
compilers.
Re: Force NO_CCACHE for gcc4.port.mk and clang.port.mk
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 09:24:33AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/11/27 13:05, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
CCache won't work for non-base C/C++ compilers, so don't even try
to do it. Okays, objections?
The ports framework only uses ccache with base gcc. I don't know why you
need add NO_CCACHE to ports-gcc/clang. Look bsd.port.mk line 2453:
.if ${USE_CCACHE:L} == yes ${NO_CCACHE:L} == no
@${ECHO_MSG} === Enabling ccache for
${FULLPKGNAME}${_MASTER}
@ln -s ${LOCALBASE}/bin/ccache ${WRKDIR}/bin/gcc
@ln -s ${LOCALBASE}/bin/ccache ${WRKDIR}/bin/g++
@ln -s ${LOCALBASE}/bin/ccache ${WRKDIR}/bin/cc
@ln -s ${LOCALBASE}/bin/ccache ${WRKDIR}/bin/c++
.endif
ccache is pretty intelligent, ignores unknown languages or compiler
options.
Ok for now, though in those cases you might want to investigate setting
CC/CXX to ccache egcc, etc. I didn't use that method for the general
case as I was worried about quoting issues e.g. MAKE_FLAGS= CC=${CC}
but this might be manageable if it's just for ports using non-base
compilers.
Why not add support for ports-gcc/clang?. The symlinks only works with
base-gcc but ccache can work with any compiler using
CCACHE_CC=mycompiler. I think a script in ${WRKDIR}/bin with
CCACHE_CC=mycompiler ccache $@ inside or something similar should be
enough.
MAKE_FLAGS= CC=${CC} uses cc from PATH=${WRKDIR}/bin. Don't worry.
--
Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info
Re: Force NO_CCACHE for gcc4.port.mk and clang.port.mk
On 2013/11/27 18:28, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 09:24:33AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/11/27 13:05, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
CCache won't work for non-base C/C++ compilers, so don't even try
to do it. Okays, objections?
The ports framework only uses ccache with base gcc. I don't know why you
need add NO_CCACHE to ports-gcc/clang. Look bsd.port.mk line 2453:
.if ${USE_CCACHE:L} == yes ${NO_CCACHE:L} == no
@${ECHO_MSG} === Enabling ccache for
${FULLPKGNAME}${_MASTER}
@ln -s ${LOCALBASE}/bin/ccache ${WRKDIR}/bin/gcc
@ln -s ${LOCALBASE}/bin/ccache ${WRKDIR}/bin/g++
@ln -s ${LOCALBASE}/bin/ccache ${WRKDIR}/bin/cc
@ln -s ${LOCALBASE}/bin/ccache ${WRKDIR}/bin/c++
.endif
ccache is pretty intelligent, ignores unknown languages or compiler
options.
Ok for now, though in those cases you might want to investigate setting
CC/CXX to ccache egcc, etc. I didn't use that method for the general
case as I was worried about quoting issues e.g. MAKE_FLAGS= CC=${CC}
but this might be manageable if it's just for ports using non-base
compilers.
Why not add support for ports-gcc/clang?. The symlinks only works with
base-gcc but ccache can work with any compiler using
CCACHE_CC=mycompiler. I think a script in ${WRKDIR}/bin with
CCACHE_CC=mycompiler ccache $@ inside or something similar should be
enough.
Hmm yes, a script could work. Needs to use exec though.
MAKE_FLAGS= CC=${CC} uses cc from PATH=${WRKDIR}/bin. Don't worry.
The problem I was referring to with quoting issues is like this,
CC= ccache $somecompiler
MAKE_FLAGS= CC=${CC}
or with similar cases in 3rd party makefiles inside ports.
Re: Force NO_CCACHE for gcc4.port.mk and clang.port.mk
2013/11/27 Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado i...@juanfra.info:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 09:24:33AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/11/27 13:05, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
CCache won't work for non-base C/C++ compilers, so don't even try
to do it. Okays, objections?
The ports framework only uses ccache with base gcc. I don't know why you
need add NO_CCACHE to ports-gcc/clang. Look bsd.port.mk line 2453:
.if ${USE_CCACHE:L} == yes ${NO_CCACHE:L} == no
@${ECHO_MSG} === Enabling ccache for
${FULLPKGNAME}${_MASTER}
@ln -s ${LOCALBASE}/bin/ccache ${WRKDIR}/bin/gcc
@ln -s ${LOCALBASE}/bin/ccache ${WRKDIR}/bin/g++
@ln -s ${LOCALBASE}/bin/ccache ${WRKDIR}/bin/cc
@ln -s ${LOCALBASE}/bin/ccache ${WRKDIR}/bin/c++
.endif
ccache is pretty intelligent, ignores unknown languages or compiler
options.
Yes. gcc4.port.mk and clang.port.mk overwrite
${WRKDIR}/bin/{cc,c++,...} that are written by bsd.port.mk when
USE_CCACHE is enabled. But this gives you false sense that ccache
works, while it does not. This is bad.
Ok for now, though in those cases you might want to investigate setting
CC/CXX to ccache egcc, etc. I didn't use that method for the general
case as I was worried about quoting issues e.g. MAKE_FLAGS= CC=${CC}
but this might be manageable if it's just for ports using non-base
compilers.
Why not add support for ports-gcc/clang?. The symlinks only works with
base-gcc but ccache can work with any compiler using
CCACHE_CC=mycompiler. I think a script in ${WRKDIR}/bin with
CCACHE_CC=mycompiler ccache $@ inside or something similar should be
enough.
Won't work for more than one language: either C or C++, but not both.
And there are ports that have both C and C++ sources to be built.
MAKE_FLAGS= CC=${CC} uses cc from PATH=${WRKDIR}/bin. Don't worry.
Yes, I know that.
--
WBR,
Vadim Zhukov
Re: Force NO_CCACHE for gcc4.port.mk and clang.port.mk
2013/11/27 Vadim Zhukov persg...@gmail.com:
2013/11/27 Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado i...@juanfra.info:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 09:24:33AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/11/27 13:05, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
CCache won't work for non-base C/C++ compilers, so don't even try
to do it. Okays, objections?
The ports framework only uses ccache with base gcc. I don't know why you
need add NO_CCACHE to ports-gcc/clang. Look bsd.port.mk line 2453:
.if ${USE_CCACHE:L} == yes ${NO_CCACHE:L} == no
@${ECHO_MSG} === Enabling ccache for
${FULLPKGNAME}${_MASTER}
@ln -s ${LOCALBASE}/bin/ccache ${WRKDIR}/bin/gcc
@ln -s ${LOCALBASE}/bin/ccache ${WRKDIR}/bin/g++
@ln -s ${LOCALBASE}/bin/ccache ${WRKDIR}/bin/cc
@ln -s ${LOCALBASE}/bin/ccache ${WRKDIR}/bin/c++
.endif
ccache is pretty intelligent, ignores unknown languages or compiler
options.
Yes. gcc4.port.mk and clang.port.mk overwrite
${WRKDIR}/bin/{cc,c++,...} that are written by bsd.port.mk when
USE_CCACHE is enabled. But this gives you false sense that ccache
works, while it does not. This is bad.
Ok for now, though in those cases you might want to investigate setting
CC/CXX to ccache egcc, etc. I didn't use that method for the general
case as I was worried about quoting issues e.g. MAKE_FLAGS= CC=${CC}
but this might be manageable if it's just for ports using non-base
compilers.
Why not add support for ports-gcc/clang?. The symlinks only works with
base-gcc but ccache can work with any compiler using
CCACHE_CC=mycompiler. I think a script in ${WRKDIR}/bin with
CCACHE_CC=mycompiler ccache $@ inside or something similar should be
enough.
Won't work for more than one language: either C or C++, but not both.
And there are ports that have both C and C++ sources to be built.
Missed the script part, sorry. Yes, this could work but, as sthen@
pointed out, it'll require additional exec(2). Still thinking about
it...
Re: Force NO_CCACHE for gcc4.port.mk and clang.port.mk
On 2013/11/27 22:53, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
Why not add support for ports-gcc/clang?. The symlinks only works with
base-gcc but ccache can work with any compiler using
CCACHE_CC=mycompiler. I think a script in ${WRKDIR}/bin with
CCACHE_CC=mycompiler ccache $@ inside or something similar should be
enough.
Won't work for more than one language: either C or C++, but not both.
something like (untested)
.if !empty(_MODGCC4_LINKS)
. for _src _dest in ${_MODGCC4_LINKS}
.if ${USE_CCACHE:L} == yes
printf '#!/bin/sh\nexec CCACHE_CC=${_src} ccache $@\n'
${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest}
chmod +x ${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest}
.else
MODGCC4_post-patch += ln -sf ${LOCALBASE}/bin/${_src} ${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest};
.endif
. endfor
.endif
Re: Force NO_CCACHE for gcc4.port.mk and clang.port.mk
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:53:29PM +0400, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
2013/11/27 Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado i...@juanfra.info:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 09:24:33AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/11/27 13:05, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
CCache won't work for non-base C/C++ compilers, so don't even try
to do it. Okays, objections?
The ports framework only uses ccache with base gcc. I don't know why you
need add NO_CCACHE to ports-gcc/clang. Look bsd.port.mk line 2453:
.if ${USE_CCACHE:L} == yes ${NO_CCACHE:L} == no
@${ECHO_MSG} === Enabling ccache for
${FULLPKGNAME}${_MASTER}
@ln -s ${LOCALBASE}/bin/ccache ${WRKDIR}/bin/gcc
@ln -s ${LOCALBASE}/bin/ccache ${WRKDIR}/bin/g++
@ln -s ${LOCALBASE}/bin/ccache ${WRKDIR}/bin/cc
@ln -s ${LOCALBASE}/bin/ccache ${WRKDIR}/bin/c++
.endif
ccache is pretty intelligent, ignores unknown languages or compiler
options.
Yes. gcc4.port.mk and clang.port.mk overwrite
${WRKDIR}/bin/{cc,c++,...} that are written by bsd.port.mk when
USE_CCACHE is enabled. But this gives you false sense that ccache
works, while it does not. This is bad.
Now I understand the patches. OK for me.
Ok for now, though in those cases you might want to investigate setting
CC/CXX to ccache egcc, etc. I didn't use that method for the general
case as I was worried about quoting issues e.g. MAKE_FLAGS= CC=${CC}
but this might be manageable if it's just for ports using non-base
compilers.
Why not add support for ports-gcc/clang?. The symlinks only works with
base-gcc but ccache can work with any compiler using
CCACHE_CC=mycompiler. I think a script in ${WRKDIR}/bin with
CCACHE_CC=mycompiler ccache $@ inside or something similar should be
enough.
Won't work for more than one language: either C or C++, but not both.
And there are ports that have both C and C++ sources to be built.
MAKE_FLAGS= CC=${CC} uses cc from PATH=${WRKDIR}/bin. Don't worry.
Yes, I know that.
--
WBR,
Vadim Zhukov
--
Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info
Re: Force NO_CCACHE for gcc4.port.mk and clang.port.mk
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 07:38:32PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/11/27 22:53, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
Why not add support for ports-gcc/clang?. The symlinks only works with
base-gcc but ccache can work with any compiler using
CCACHE_CC=mycompiler. I think a script in ${WRKDIR}/bin with
CCACHE_CC=mycompiler ccache $@ inside or something similar should be
enough.
Won't work for more than one language: either C or C++, but not both.
something like (untested)
.if !empty(_MODGCC4_LINKS)
. for _src _dest in ${_MODGCC4_LINKS}
.if ${USE_CCACHE:L} == yes
printf '#!/bin/sh\nexec CCACHE_CC=${_src} ccache $@\n'
${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest}
chmod +x ${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest}
.else
MODGCC4_post-patch += ln -sf ${LOCALBASE}/bin/${_src} ${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest};
.endif
. endfor
.endif
*** Parse error in /usr/ports/www/webkit: Need an operator in '''
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:81)
*** Parse error: Need an operator in '/bin/gcc'
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:82)
*** Parse error: Need an operator in '''
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:81)
*** Parse error: Need an operator in '/bin/cc'
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:82)
*** Parse error: Need an operator in '''
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:81)
*** Parse error: Need an operator in '/bin/g++'
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:82)
*** Parse error: Need an operator in '''
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:81)
*** Parse error: Need an operator in '/bin/c++'
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:82)
Line 81 is the printf.
--
Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info
Re: Force NO_CCACHE for gcc4.port.mk and clang.port.mk
On 2013/11/27 23:56, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 07:38:32PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/11/27 22:53, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
Why not add support for ports-gcc/clang?. The symlinks only works with
base-gcc but ccache can work with any compiler using
CCACHE_CC=mycompiler. I think a script in ${WRKDIR}/bin with
CCACHE_CC=mycompiler ccache $@ inside or something similar should be
enough.
Won't work for more than one language: either C or C++, but not both.
something like (untested)
.if !empty(_MODGCC4_LINKS)
. for _src _dest in ${_MODGCC4_LINKS}
.if ${USE_CCACHE:L} == yes
printf '#!/bin/sh\nexec CCACHE_CC=${_src} ccache $@\n'
${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest}
chmod +x ${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest}
.else
MODGCC4_post-patch += ln -sf ${LOCALBASE}/bin/${_src}
${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest};
.endif
. endfor
.endif
*** Parse error in /usr/ports/www/webkit: Need an operator in '''
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:81)
*** Parse error: Need an operator in '/bin/gcc'
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:82)
*** Parse error: Need an operator in '''
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:81)
*** Parse error: Need an operator in '/bin/cc'
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:82)
*** Parse error: Need an operator in '''
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:81)
*** Parse error: Need an operator in '/bin/g++'
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:82)
*** Parse error: Need an operator in '''
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:81)
*** Parse error: Need an operator in '/bin/c++'
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:82)
Line 81 is the printf.
--
Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info
Oh yes, that needs some MODGCC4_post-patch +=
Re: Force NO_CCACHE for gcc4.port.mk and clang.port.mk
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:00:29PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/11/27 23:56, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 07:38:32PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/11/27 22:53, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
Why not add support for ports-gcc/clang?. The symlinks only works with
base-gcc but ccache can work with any compiler using
CCACHE_CC=mycompiler. I think a script in ${WRKDIR}/bin with
CCACHE_CC=mycompiler ccache $@ inside or something similar should be
enough.
Won't work for more than one language: either C or C++, but not both.
something like (untested)
.if !empty(_MODGCC4_LINKS)
. for _src _dest in ${_MODGCC4_LINKS}
.if ${USE_CCACHE:L} == yes
printf '#!/bin/sh\nexec CCACHE_CC=${_src} ccache $@\n'
${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest}
chmod +x ${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest}
.else
MODGCC4_post-patch += ln -sf ${LOCALBASE}/bin/${_src}
${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest};
.endif
. endfor
.endif
*** Parse error in /usr/ports/www/webkit: Need an operator in '''
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:81)
*** Parse error: Need an operator in '/bin/gcc'
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:82)
*** Parse error: Need an operator in '''
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:81)
*** Parse error: Need an operator in '/bin/cc'
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:82)
*** Parse error: Need an operator in '''
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:81)
*** Parse error: Need an operator in '/bin/g++'
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:82)
*** Parse error: Need an operator in '''
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:81)
*** Parse error: Need an operator in '/bin/c++'
(/usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.6/gcc4.port.mk:82)
Line 81 is the printf.
--
Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info
Oh yes, that needs some MODGCC4_post-patch +=
MODGCC4_post-patch += printf '#!/bin/sh\nexec CCACHE_CC=${_src} ccache $@\n'
${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest}
MODGCC4_post-patch += chmod +x ${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest}
or
MODGCC4_post-patch += printf '#!/bin/sh\nexec CCACHE_CC=${_src} ccache $@\n'
${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest}; chmod +x ${WRKDIR}/bin/${_dest}
These lines don't work. Webkit uses ccache with system-gcc.
--
Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info
