Re: Remove: databases/luma

2020-02-03 Thread Landry Breuil
On Sat, Feb 01, 2020 at 05:18:19PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2020/02/01 18:01, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > Last news: "Wed Feb 27 22:01:37 CET 2008 -Luma 3.0 - QT4 migration Luma
> > 3.0 ..." - http://luma.sourceforge.net/
> > 
> > Can we delete this, please?
> > 
> 
> OK with me. Seems dead upstream, it isn't hugely useful (who needs more
> than ldapvi? :-) and I can't find replies from when I asked for tests of
> luma (and a few others) with a py-ldap update (aug 2018).

there's also https://sourceforge.net/projects/gqclient/ which is more or
less dead upstream to, and shelldap - i only use shelldap those days,
and imo luma can go to the attic :)

Landry



Re: Remove: databases/luma

2020-02-01 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020/02/01 18:01, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> Last news: "Wed Feb 27 22:01:37 CET 2008 -Luma 3.0 - QT4 migration Luma
> 3.0 ..." - http://luma.sourceforge.net/
> 
> Can we delete this, please?
> 

OK with me. Seems dead upstream, it isn't hugely useful (who needs more
than ldapvi? :-) and I can't find replies from when I asked for tests of
luma (and a few others) with a py-ldap update (aug 2018).



Remove: databases/luma

2020-02-01 Thread Rafael Sadowski
Last news: "Wed Feb 27 22:01:37 CET 2008 -Luma 3.0 - QT4 migration Luma
3.0 ..." - http://luma.sourceforge.net/

Can we delete this, please?