Re: chromium comes to town

2008-09-05 Thread Matthew Dempsky
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Rajneesh N. Shetty
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I coud'nt install Google's Chrome browser on my machine

Chrome only works on Windows.  Source code builds some framework stuff
on some other platforms, but nothing useful yet.

Give it a few months.



Re: chromium comes to town

2008-09-05 Thread Rajneesh N. Shetty


tel :  +61431 823 603

Peter,
I coud'nt install Google's Chrome browser on my machine;value returned=not 
32bit app.find that hard to believe, any ideas?Rajneesh
'Worry looks around, sorry looks back, faith looks up'.

--- On Wed, 3/9/08, Peter Hessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Peter Hessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: chromium comes to town
To: ports@openbsd.org
Received: Wednesday, 3 September, 2008, 6:03 PM

they only released pre-built binaries for windows.  the link below shows
how to fetch and build from source.


On 2008 Sep 02 (Tue) at 18:32:16 -0500 (-0500), Marco Peereboom wrote:
:It might be interested when they are not a windows only thing...
:
:On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 01:11:28AM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
:> hi there,
:> 
:> is anybody looking at this?
:> http://dev.chromium.org/developers/how-tos/build-instructions-linux
:> 
:> perhaps it's not too linux oriented
:> if they chose the bsd license :]
:> 
:> -f
:> -- 
:> if practice makes perfect, and nobody's perfect, why practice?
:> 
:

-- 
Bore, n.:
A guy who wraps up a two-minute idea in a two-hour vocabulary.
-- Walter Winchell




  Win a MacBook Air or iPod touch with Yahoo!7. 
http://au.docs.yahoo.com/homepageset

Re: chromium comes to town

2008-09-05 Thread Marc Espie
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 08:03:19PM -0400, Brad wrote:
> Their codebase does not even work on 64-bit systems yet! IMO this is
> beyond ridiculous.

On the other hand, they have a lot of manpower, so wait and see...
I predict that, in 3 months time, it will be much better.



Re: chromium comes to town

2008-09-04 Thread Brad
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 16:55:39 +0100
Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On 2008/09/04 09:25, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
> > > If you have read the comic, you might remember that their JavaScript
> > > engine compiles to native machine code.  Guess how many of our CPU
> > > architectures will be supported?
> > 
> > I think the CPU specific part is independent of OS.  So, once it's
> > ported to the CPU you want (by someone(tm)), it's OK. :)
> 
> that's probably ok for i386 and arm then. maybe amd64. but what's
> the chance of seeing hppa, sparc (!64-bit), superh, even powerpc...

Their codebase does not even work on 64-bit systems yet! IMO this is
beyond ridiculous.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



Re: chromium comes to town

2008-09-04 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2008/09/04 09:25, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
> > If you have read the comic, you might remember that their JavaScript
> > engine compiles to native machine code.  Guess how many of our CPU
> > architectures will be supported?
> 
> I think the CPU specific part is independent of OS.  So, once it's
> ported to the CPU you want (by someone(tm)), it's OK. :)

that's probably ok for i386 and arm then. maybe amd64. but what's
the chance of seeing hppa, sparc (!64-bit), superh, even powerpc...



Re: chromium comes to town

2008-09-04 Thread Masao Uebayashi
> If you have read the comic, you might remember that their JavaScript
> engine compiles to native machine code.  Guess how many of our CPU
> architectures will be supported?

I think the CPU specific part is independent of OS.  So, once it's
ported to the CPU you want (by someone(tm)), it's OK. :)

Masao



Re: chromium comes to town

2008-09-04 Thread Brandon Mercer
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 12:21 AM, patrick keshishian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 20:50:27 -0700
> > "patrick keshishian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Christian Weisgerber <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > If you have read the comic, you might remember that their JavaScript
> >> > engine compiles to native machine code.  Guess how many of our CPU
> >> > architectures will be supported?
> >>
> >> http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/
> >>
> >> :-)
> >
> > And your point is?
>
> Simply providing a link to the "comic" Christian Weisgerber
> was referring to.


I guess I failed to see some of the nasty dependencies that are required for
this browser.  While the project itself is licensed BSD, all the stuff it
depends on isn't.  It also seems they've done some crazy things like keeping
all the sources for all the deps in their source tree... could make for
quite the mess But the comic looks cool!
==fanboi out==


Re: chromium comes to town

2008-09-03 Thread patrick keshishian
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 20:50:27 -0700
> "patrick keshishian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Christian Weisgerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>> wrote:
>> > If you have read the comic, you might remember that their JavaScript
>> > engine compiles to native machine code.  Guess how many of our CPU
>> > architectures will be supported?
>>
>> http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/
>>
>> :-)
>
> And your point is?

Simply providing a link to the "comic" Christian Weisgerber
was referring to.

--patrick



Re: chromium comes to town

2008-09-03 Thread Brad
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 20:50:27 -0700
"patrick keshishian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Christian Weisgerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
> > If you have read the comic, you might remember that their JavaScript
> > engine compiles to native machine code.  Guess how many of our CPU
> > architectures will be supported?
> 
> http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/
> 
> :-)

And your point is?

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



Re: chromium comes to town

2008-09-03 Thread patrick keshishian
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Christian Weisgerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> frantisek holop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> is anybody looking at this?
>> http://dev.chromium.org/developers/how-tos/build-instructions-linux
>
> I at least would wait for the Google guys to finish a port to some
> Unix/X11 platform (Linux/i386, in other words).
>
> If you have read the comic, you might remember that their JavaScript
> engine compiles to native machine code.  Guess how many of our CPU
> architectures will be supported?

http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/

:-)


>
> "V8 [...] runs on Windows XP and Vista, Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard),
>  and Linux systems that use IA-32 or ARM processors."
>
> Chromium is going to be more difficult to port than Mozilla.
>
> --
> Christian "naddy" Weisgerber  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: chromium comes to town

2008-09-03 Thread Brandon Mercer
Yes, but most of us on going to be using the web on those archs.  I think
this is a step in the right direction.  And now that they've fixed their
license it's time to take a closer look.  Brandon

On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Christian Weisgerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> frantisek holop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > is anybody looking at this?
> > http://dev.chromium.org/developers/how-tos/build-instructions-linux
>
> I at least would wait for the Google guys to finish a port to some
> Unix/X11 platform (Linux/i386, in other words).
>
> If you have read the comic, you might remember that their JavaScript
> engine compiles to native machine code.  Guess how many of our CPU
> architectures will be supported?
>
> "V8 [...] runs on Windows XP and Vista, Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard),
>  and Linux systems that use IA-32 or ARM processors."
>
> Chromium is going to be more difficult to port than Mozilla.
>
> --
> Christian "naddy" Weisgerber  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


Re: chromium comes to town

2008-09-03 Thread Christian Weisgerber
frantisek holop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> is anybody looking at this?
> http://dev.chromium.org/developers/how-tos/build-instructions-linux

I at least would wait for the Google guys to finish a port to some
Unix/X11 platform (Linux/i386, in other words).

If you have read the comic, you might remember that their JavaScript
engine compiles to native machine code.  Guess how many of our CPU
architectures will be supported?

"V8 [...] runs on Windows XP and Vista, Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard),
 and Linux systems that use IA-32 or ARM processors."

Chromium is going to be more difficult to port than Mozilla.

-- 
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: chromium comes to town

2008-09-03 Thread Peter Hessler
they only released pre-built binaries for windows.  the link below shows
how to fetch and build from source.


On 2008 Sep 02 (Tue) at 18:32:16 -0500 (-0500), Marco Peereboom wrote:
:It might be interested when they are not a windows only thing...
:
:On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 01:11:28AM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
:> hi there,
:> 
:> is anybody looking at this?
:> http://dev.chromium.org/developers/how-tos/build-instructions-linux
:> 
:> perhaps it's not too linux oriented
:> if they chose the bsd license :]
:> 
:> -f
:> -- 
:> if practice makes perfect, and nobody's perfect, why practice?
:> 
:

-- 
Bore, n.:
A guy who wraps up a two-minute idea in a two-hour vocabulary.
-- Walter Winchell



Re: chromium comes to town

2008-09-02 Thread Marco Peereboom
It might be interested when they are not a windows only thing...

On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 01:11:28AM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
> hi there,
> 
> is anybody looking at this?
> http://dev.chromium.org/developers/how-tos/build-instructions-linux
> 
> perhaps it's not too linux oriented
> if they chose the bsd license :]
> 
> -f
> -- 
> if practice makes perfect, and nobody's perfect, why practice?
> 



chromium comes to town

2008-09-02 Thread frantisek holop
hi there,

is anybody looking at this?
http://dev.chromium.org/developers/how-tos/build-instructions-linux

perhaps it's not too linux oriented
if they chose the bsd license :]

-f
-- 
if practice makes perfect, and nobody's perfect, why practice?