Re: new: sysutils/cfengine3

2010-12-06 Thread Okan Demirmen
On Thu 2010.12.02 at 16:21 -0800, Chris Kuethe wrote:
 i'm starting to mess with cfengine3, it's not backwards compatible
 with cfengine, so I did up a separate port

Hi,

A note: if --with-berkeleydb is spelled correctly in CONFIGURE_ARGS, I
believe the LIB_DEPENDS for databases/db/v4 will come back.

I am not opposed to simply replacing the v2 port with v3 (I know
incompatible), but there maybe some who never responded to your first
probe about this idea a few months back, so I guess a separate
port...but then again, how many people are we talking need this?
Anyone?  Current and/or previous maintainers opinion?

Cheers,
Okan



new: sysutils/cfengine3

2010-12-02 Thread Chris Kuethe
i'm starting to mess with cfengine3, it's not backwards compatible
with cfengine, so I did up a separate port

http://www.cfengine.org/

-- 
GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?


cfengine3.tgz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data