Re: sysutils/nomad: remove BROKEN-aarch64 marker
Fine with me. — Antoine > On 16 Apr 2024, at 13:01, Caspar Schutijser wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 11:15:18AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: >>> On 2024/04/12 17:57, Caspar Schutijser wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> This port builds successfully on arm64. I did not test this >>> at runtime. It's possible it builds on armv7 too these days >>> since the BROKEN message is the same but I can't test it on >>> armv7. >> >> I suggest removing BROKEN-armv7 as well, the root cause was the same so >> if it still fails it should now be for a different reason. > > Okay, I'll do that in a bit. I'll do the same for > sysutils/terragrunt since the same applies there. > > Caspar >
Re: sysutils/nomad: remove BROKEN-aarch64 marker
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 11:15:18AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2024/04/12 17:57, Caspar Schutijser wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This port builds successfully on arm64. I did not test this > > at runtime. It's possible it builds on armv7 too these days > > since the BROKEN message is the same but I can't test it on > > armv7. > > I suggest removing BROKEN-armv7 as well, the root cause was the same so > if it still fails it should now be for a different reason. Okay, I'll do that in a bit. I'll do the same for sysutils/terragrunt since the same applies there. Caspar
Re: sysutils/nomad: remove BROKEN-aarch64 marker
On 2024/04/12 17:57, Caspar Schutijser wrote: > Hi, > > This port builds successfully on arm64. I did not test this > at runtime. It's possible it builds on armv7 too these days > since the BROKEN message is the same but I can't test it on > armv7. I suggest removing BROKEN-armv7 as well, the root cause was the same so if it still fails it should now be for a different reason.
Re: sysutils/nomad: remove BROKEN-aarch64 marker
Sure. — Antoine > On 12 Apr 2024, at 17:57, Caspar Schutijser wrote: > > Hi, > > This port builds successfully on arm64. I did not test this > at runtime. It's possible it builds on armv7 too these days > since the BROKEN message is the same but I can't test it on > armv7. > > Comments or OKs? > > Caspar > > > Index: Makefile > === > RCS file: /cvs/ports/sysutils/nomad/Makefile,v > retrieving revision 1.81 > diff -u -p -r1.81 Makefile > --- Makefile23 Mar 2024 13:27:36 -1.81 > +++ Makefile12 Apr 2024 15:54:59 - > @@ -1,4 +1,3 @@ > -BROKEN-aarch64=old kr/pty doesn't support OpenBSD arm arches; needs > creack/pty@v1.1.11 > BROKEN-armv7=old kr/pty doesn't support OpenBSD arm arches; needs > creack/pty@v1.1.11 > > # bunch of undefined things in crypto/blake2b, shirou/gopsutil/disk, > shirou/gopsutil/mem >
sysutils/nomad: remove BROKEN-aarch64 marker
Hi, This port builds successfully on arm64. I did not test this at runtime. It's possible it builds on armv7 too these days since the BROKEN message is the same but I can't test it on armv7. Comments or OKs? Caspar Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/sysutils/nomad/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.81 diff -u -p -r1.81 Makefile --- Makefile23 Mar 2024 13:27:36 - 1.81 +++ Makefile12 Apr 2024 15:54:59 - @@ -1,4 +1,3 @@ -BROKEN-aarch64=old kr/pty doesn't support OpenBSD arm arches; needs creack/pty@v1.1.11 BROKEN-armv7= old kr/pty doesn't support OpenBSD arm arches; needs creack/pty@v1.1.11 # bunch of undefined things in crypto/blake2b, shirou/gopsutil/disk, shirou/gopsutil/mem
