mailing lists software ?
Hello We are moving our old LISTSERV server after 15 years of very good services :-) Lsoft prices have grown up amazingly so I plan to use open source software to replace it ... I would like to have feedbacks from lists managers that use Postfix we have approx 100 lists most of them are internals. Thank you
Re: mailing lists software ?
On 16/09/2011 08:18, Frank Bonnet wrote: Hello We are moving our old LISTSERV server after 15 years of very good services :-) Lsoft prices have grown up amazingly so I plan to use open source software to replace it ... I would like to have feedbacks from lists managers that use Postfix we have approx 100 lists most of them are internals. Mailman. It just plain works. Mark -- Sent from my Babbage Difference Engine http://mark.goodge.co.uk http://www.ratemysupermarket.com
SV: mailing lists software ?
Hi, We use mailman along with postfix and that is truly a stable and good solution and then it's free :-) regards Peter Fra: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] P#229; vegne af Frank Bonnet [f.bon...@esiee.fr] Sendt: 16. september 2011 09:18 Til: Postfix users Emne: mailing lists software ? Hello We are moving our old LISTSERV server after 15 years of very good services :-) Lsoft prices have grown up amazingly so I plan to use open source software to replace it ... I would like to have feedbacks from lists managers that use Postfix we have approx 100 lists most of them are internals. Thank you
Re: mailing lists software ?
Hello We are moving our old LISTSERV server after 15 years of very good services :-) Lsoft prices have grown up amazingly so I plan to use open source software to replace it ... I would like to have feedbacks from lists managers that use Postfix we have approx 100 lists most of them are internals. Thank you I have been using postfix with mailman without any problems.
Re: mailing lists software ?
Throwing one more in for Mailman. -Dennis Carr -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. Frank Bonnet f.bon...@esiee.fr wrote: Hello We are moving our old LISTSERV server after 15 years of very good services :-) Lsoft prices have grown up amazingly so I plan to use open source software to replace it ... I would like to have feedbacks from lists managers that use Postfix we have approx 100 lists most of them are internals. Thank you
Re: mailing lists software ?
Il 16/09/2011 9.18, Frank Bonnet ha scritto: Hello We are moving our old LISTSERV server after 15 years of very good services :-) Lsoft prices have grown up amazingly so I plan to use open source software to replace it ... I would like to have feedbacks from lists managers that use Postfix we have approx 100 lists most of them are internals. Thank you I use mlmmj (http://mlmmj.org/) without any problem. I like his semplicity and low requirements. Bye, Claudio. -- Claudio Prono OPST System Developer Gsm: +39-349-54.33.258 @PSS Srl Tel: +39-011-32.72.100 Via San Bernardino, 17Fax: +39-011-32.46.497 10141 Torino - ITALY http://atpss.net/disclaimer PGP Key - http://keys.atpss.net/c_prono.asc
Re: problem telnet 25 with ipv6
Le vendredi 16 septembre 2011 00:12, mouss a écrit : Le 15/09/2011 03:34, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu a écrit : hello list hello guru of postfix I think I have correctly configure bind for IPv6. but I still can not connect with telnet on my server all testimonials are welcome well, it is hard or us to see what bind have to do with can not connect. bind is about names. connection is about IP. different beasts. you need to tell us more. what can not connect exactly means? show transcripts and logs. mouss thank you. I precise I did not fit ipv6 in my apartment I see you in my ipv6 traffic logs (logwatch, xtail) my ns secondary servers are not connected with ipv6 but one that has serious problems with the serial refresh of the zone ie it is always late for several days or weeks I have yet properly declare a reverse zone ipv6 and in my area so I do not know if traceroute -6 ping6 and runs on my server so [*@localhost ~]$ host -t fakessh.eu fakessh.eu has IPv6 address 2002::5762:bae8 [**@localhost ~]$ host -t fakessh.eu 8.8.8.8 Using domain server: Name: 8.8.8.8 Address: 8.8.8.8#53 Aliases: fakessh.eu has IPv6 address 2002::5762:bae8 since my command line r13151 telnet down with no trace in maillog and trace in message Sep 16 16:42:02 r13151 kernel: Shorewall:fw2net:ACCEPT:IN= OUT=eth0 SRC=94.23.60.214 DST=94.23.60.251 LEN=194 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=0 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=57165 DPT=6184 LEN=174 Sep 16 16:42:18 r13151 kernel: Shorewall:net2fw:ACCEPT:IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:1c:c0:c4:d9:8a:00:24:c3:84:04:00:08:00 SRC=217.119.181.42 DST=87.98.186.232 LEN=67 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=56 ID=28172 PROTO=UDP SPT=18611 DPT=53 LEN=47 Sep 16 16:42:49 r13151 kernel: Shorewall:net2fw:ACCEPT:IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:1c:c0:c4:d9:8a:00:24:c3:84:04:00:08:00 SRC=86.201.250.73 DST=87.98.186.232 LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=54 ID=65252 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=48400 DPT=443 WINDOW=5840 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 Sep 16 16:42:49 r13151 kernel: Shorewall:fw2net:ACCEPT:IN= OUT=lo SRC=127.0.0.1 DST=127.0.0.1 LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=22497 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=41141 DPT=993 WINDOW=32792 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 Sep 16 16:42:49 r13151 kernel: Shorewall:net2fw:ACCEPT:IN=lo OUT= MAC=00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:08:00 SRC=127.0.0.1 DST=127.0.0.1 LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=22497 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=41141 DPT=993 WINDOW=32792 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 Sep 16 16:42:58 r13151 kernel: Shorewall:fw2net:ACCEPT:IN= OUT=eth0 SRC=94.23.60.214 DST=213.186.33.99 LEN=76 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=0 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=123 DPT=123 LEN=56 Sep 16 16:43:01 r13151 kernel: Shorewall:fw2net:ACCEPT:IN= OUT=eth0 SRC=94.23.60.214 DST=94.23.60.251 LEN=211 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=0 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=57131 DPT=6154 LEN=191 Sep 16 16:43:01 r13151 kernel: Shorewall:fw2net:ACCEPT:IN= OUT=eth0 SRC=94.23.60.214 DST=94.23.60.251 LEN=217 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=0 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=34630 DPT=6183 LEN=197 Sep 16 16:43:01 r13151 kernel: Shorewall:fw2net:ACCEPT:IN= OUT=eth0 SRC=94.23.60.214 DST=94.23.60.251 LEN=223 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=0 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=39287 DPT=6113 LEN=203 Sep 16 16:43:01 r13151 kernel: Shorewall:fw2net:ACCEPT:IN= OUT=eth0 SRC=94.23.60.214 DST=94.23.60.251 LEN=194 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=0 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=45924 DPT=6109 LEN=174 Sep 16 16:43:27 r13151 kernel: Shorewall:fw2net:ACCEPT:IN= OUT=eth0 SRC=94.23.60.214 DST=213.186.33.99 LEN=118 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=62932 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=38974 DPT=53 LEN=98 Sep 16 16:43:27 r13151 kernel: Shorewall:fw2net:ACCEPT:IN= OUT=eth0 SRC=2001:41d0:0002:3dd6:::: DST=2002::::::5762:bae8 LEN=80 TC=0 HOPLIMIT=64 FLOWLBL=0 PROTO=TCP SPT=60020 DPT=25 WINDOW=5760 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 Sep 16 16:43:30 r13151 kernel: Shorewall:fw2net:ACCEPT:IN= OUT=eth0 SRC=2001:41d0:0002:3dd6:::: DST=2002::::::5762:bae8 LEN=80 TC=0 HOPLIMIT=64 FLOWLBL=0 PROTO=TCP SPT=60020 DPT=25 WINDOW=5760 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 Sep 16 16:43:31 r13151 kernel: Shorewall:net2fw:ACCEPT:IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:1c:c0:c4:d9:8a:00:24:c3:84:04:00:08:00 SRC=119.63.196.123 DST=87.98.186.232 LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=50 ID=29933 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=39910 DPT=80 WINDOW=5840 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 Sep 16 16:43:35 r13151 kernel: Shorewall:fw2net:ACCEPT:IN= OUT=eth0 SRC=94.23.60.214 DST=213.186.33.99 LEN=63 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=64809 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=58939 DPT=53 LEN=43 Sep 16 16:43:35 r13151 kernel: Shorewall:fw2net:ACCEPT:IN= OUT=eth0 SRC=94.23.60.214 DST=213.186.33.99 LEN=71 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=64810 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=41413 DPT=53 LEN=51 Sep 16 16:43:35 r13151 kernel: Shorewall:fw2net:ACCEPT:IN= OUT=eth0 SRC=94.23.60.214 DST=213.186.33.99 LEN=63 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=64810 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=54001 DPT=53 LEN=43 Sep 16 16:43:35 r13151 kernel: Shorewall:fw2net:ACCEPT:IN= OUT=eth0 SRC=94.23.60.214 DST=94.23.155.96 LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=53808 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=39342 DPT=80
Re: mailing lists software ?
Frank Bonnet wrote: We are moving our old LISTSERV server after 15 years of very good services :-) Lsoft prices have grown up amazingly so I plan to use open source software to replace it ... I would like to have feedbacks from lists managers that use Postfix we have approx 100 lists most of them are internals. I'm in a similar context (40 lists, not 100, but mostly internal/closed - varying from very small to a couple of 1000 subscribers). I've had pretty good luck with Sympa (www.sympa.org). Open source, developed and well supported by a consortium of French universities. Too many years back, when I migrated from majordomo, the choices were basically Mailman and Sympa - and at the time Mailman seemed aimed mostly at people running small numbers of lists, while Sympa was designed specifically for university-scale enterprises with lots of lists. For example, as I recall, Mailman used to treat each list completely separately - while Sympa runs off a consolidated subscriber database. It looks like Mailman has evolved considerably since then, though. Sympa has all the right functionality for an enterprise-scale operation, and has lots of hooks for customization of message formats, subscription approval processes, moderation, etc., etc. But.. it's also just a bit cumbersome to administer (too many tabs to wade through for some things). It's also just a bit tricky to get set up - particularly when wiring the pieces together (mail server, database, antivirus, antispam) - but not that much more than getting, say, postfix+amavisd+spamassassin+clam all wired up. I would recommend installing from source (perl, I think), rather than relying on packaged versions (at least on Debian, a few years back, the packages were always a couple of revs behind, never quite worked right, and were harder to wire together since they tend to put stuff in different places than the standard distribution). Miles Fidelman -- In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. Infnord practice, there is. Yogi Berra
smtpd_restriction_classes access restrictions
Hello All! I have a question about Postfix SMTP server access restrictions, does Postfix support smtpd_restriction_classes in smtpd_sender_restrictions? For a different FROM domains I need to define different rules: from which IP-addresses and to which TO domains each of them can send a message. Do anybody know how it can be configured? Thanks! Sergiy Dryga [http://www.life.com.ua/i/signature/banner1.png] http://www.life.com.ua/life.html ?! ??? ?? -??? ??? ? ? ?? ?? ?? ? ??? ?? ??? , ???. ?? ?? ? ? ? ?, ?, ? ?? ??, ?? -??? ??, ???, ?? ??? ??, ?? ? ? ?, ?? ??, ? ??? ??? . life:) ?? ??? ??? - ?? ? ? . ? ? life:) ?? - ?? ??, ?? ? ? ? ?, ? ? ?? ?? , ?, ?? ??? - ?. ?, ? ? ? , ???, ? life:) ?? ?? . ??? ??? ??? ??? ?? ??? ??? '??? ???. Attention! This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, forwarding, copying or use of any of the information is strictly prohibited, and the e-mail should immediately be deleted. life:) makes no warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of any information contained in this message and hereby excludes any liability of any kind for the information contained therein or for the information transmission, reception, storage or use of such in any way whatsoever. The opinions expressed in this message belong to sender alone and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of life:). This e-mail has been scanned for all known computer viruses.
Re: mailing lists software ?
On 2011-09-16 10:47 AM, Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote: For example, as I recall, Mailman used to treat each list completely separately - while Sympa runs off a consolidated subscriber database. It looks like Mailman has evolved considerably since then, though. Mailman 3, which is not too far away, will fix pretty much all of the issues anyone ever had with mailman - it will support real database backends for subscribers, and will fully support virtual domains natively. One of it's major drawbacks with virtual domains was you couldn't (easily) have two lists with the same name for multiple domains. -- Best regards, Charles
Re: smtpd_restriction_classes access restrictions
On 9/16/2011 10:01 AM, Sergiy Dryga wrote: I have a question about Postfix SMTP server access restrictions, does Postfix support “smtpd_restriction_classes” in “smtpd_sender_restrictions”? Restriction classes are documented here: http://www.postfix.org/RESTRICTION_CLASS_README.html For a different “FROM” domains I need to define different rules: from which IP-addresses and to which “TO” domains each of themcan send a message. Do anybody know how it can be configured? Examples are included in the documentation. -- Noel Jones
Re: Issue integrating with Cyrus-SASL
Crazedfred crazedf...@yahoo.com: What is the result of:find / -name smtpd.conf sudo find / -name smtpd.conf /usr/lib/sasl2/smtpd.conf read the debian documentation! Could you elaborate? Am I looking for the wrong file? That search above was ran at the behest of another user on this list. The Debian Wiki (http://wiki.debian.org/Postfix) mentions /etc/postfix/main.cf and /etc/postfix/master.cf, both of which I've been editing.
Re: Issue integrating with Cyrus-SASL
Crazedfred: ? Crazedfred crazedf...@yahoo.com: What is the result of:find / -name smtpd.conf sudo find / -name smtpd.conf /usr/lib/sasl2/smtpd.conf read the debian documentation! Could you elaborate? Am I looking for the wrong file? I have seen several hints on this mailing list that Debian Postfix wants to read /etc/postfix/sasl/smtpd.conf. Wietse
Re: Issue integrating with Cyrus-SASL
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:17:13 -0400 (EDT) Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: Crazedfred: ? Crazedfred crazedf...@yahoo.com: What is the result of:find / -name smtpd.conf sudo find / -name smtpd.conf /usr/lib/sasl2/smtpd.conf read the debian documentation! Could you elaborate? Am I looking for the wrong file? I have seen several hints on this mailing list that Debian Postfix wants to read /etc/postfix/sasl/smtpd.conf. That's exactly where it is on mine.
Re: moving entire postfix queue between machines
Em 15/09/11 19:16, mouss escreveu: in that scenario, is it OK to backup the /var/spool/postfix folder on the old machine and simply drop it on the new machine ? please stay with us. you said I do nt have a spare machine then ... on the nwe machine?? do you mean the new disk? sorry ... as 'new machine' i meant to say on the 'new OS installed on the new disk on the same machine'. Will that keep the messages that were on the queue ? Of course, i'll completly remove the var/spool/postfix on the new machine before doing that, im not thinking on merging queues in anyway, i just want to get the queue from the old machine and drop on the new one. will that work as expected, or it wont ? you need to to stop postfix first, then you can copy the queue. Nice to hear that ... i was already aware that the procedure would require postfix to be stopped, no problem on that. thanks for the advices mouss ! -- Atenciosamente / Sincerily, Leonardo Rodrigues Solutti Tecnologia http://www.solutti.com.br Minha armadilha de SPAM, NÃO mandem email gertru...@solutti.com.br My SPAMTRAP, do not email it
Re: Issue integrating with Cyrus-SASL
* Crazedfred crazedf...@yahoo.com: Crazedfred crazedf...@yahoo.com: What is the result of:find / -name smtpd.conf sudo find / -name smtpd.conf /usr/lib/sasl2/smtpd.conf read the debian documentation! Could you elaborate? Am I looking for the wrong file? That search above was ran at the behest of another user on this list. The Debian Wiki (http://wiki.debian.org/Postfix) mentions /etc/postfix/main.cf and /etc/postfix/master.cf, both of which I've been editing. Download and unpack http://www.state-of-mind.de/download/saslauthd_script.tar.gz. Then run: $ scriptreplay saslauthd.timing saslauthd.session It will replay a session where I install and configure Cyrus SASL for Postfix using saslauthd on squeeze. p@rick -- All technical questions asked privately will be automatically answered on the list and archived for public access unless privacy is explicitely required and justified. saslfinger (debugging SMTP AUTH): http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patrick.koetter/saslfinger/
Re: bcc send map issue - duplication when mail sent from other host
On 2011-09-16 04:08, Michael Ribbons wrote: Hi, I am using bcc_send_maps No such option exists. You may be referring to sender_bcc_maps. so all mail sent by POP Ugh. Re-check your basics - POP is not a mail SENDING protocol. is BCC to a particular address. So all mail from @example.com is BCCd to crm_sys...@example.com This works fine. However when we send mail from our webshop, the mail gets BCC'd as well, eg mail from webs...@example.com, mail to: sa...@example.com I think this is because the first address matches the send map spec of @example.com However I don't want this behaviour - We are also using bcc_recipient_maps so everything coming in to @example.com already gets copied to crm_sys...@example.com Again, the option is called recipient_bcc_maps. And why use both for the same domain ? That sounds suspicously like a broken configuration attempt. Is there any way to tell postfix not to use bcc_send_maps for mail sent by other sendmails? Exclude it. Map formats and examples are documented clearly. http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#recipient_bcc_maps http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#sender_bcc_maps http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_REWRITING_README.html#overview -- J.
